Comparison of integrated whole-body [11C]choline PET/MR with PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the performance of conventional [¹¹C]choline PET/CT in comparison to that of simultaneous whole-body PET/MR.

Methods

The study population comprised 32 patients with prostate cancer who underwent a single-injection dual-imaging protocol with PET/CT and subsequent PET/MR. PET/CT scans were performed applying standard clinical protocols (5 min after injection of 793?±?69 MBq [¹¹C]choline, 3 min per bed position, intravenous contrast agent). Subsequently (52?±?15 min after injection) PET/MR was performed (4 min per bed position). PET images were reconstructed iteratively (OSEM 3D), scatter and attenuation correction of emission data and regional allocation of [¹¹C]choline foci were performed using CT data for PET/CT and segmented Dixon MR, T1 and T2 sequences for PET/MR. Image quality of the respective PET scans and PET alignment with the respective morphological imaging modality were compared using a four point scale (0–3). Furthermore, number, location and conspicuity of the detected lesions were evaluated. SUVs for suspicious lesions, lung, liver, spleen, vertebral bone and muscle were compared.

Results

Overall 80 lesions were scored visually in 29 of the 32 patients. There was no significant difference between the two PET scans concerning number or conspicuity of the detected lesions (p not significant). PET/MR with T1 and T2 sequences performed better than PET/CT in anatomical allocation of lesions (2.87?±?0.3 vs. 2.72?±?0.5; p?=?0.005). The quality of PET/CT images (2.97?±?0.2) was better than that of the respective PET scan of the PET/MR (2.69?±?0.5; p?=?0.007). Overall the maximum and mean lesional SUVs exhibited high correlations between PET/CT and PET/MR (ρ?=?0.87 and ρ?=?0.86, respectively; both p?<?0.001).

Conclusion

Despite a substantially later imaging time-point, the performance of simultaneous PET/MR was comparable to that of PET/CT in detecting lesions with increased [¹¹C]choline uptake in patients with prostate cancer. Anatomical allocation of lesions was better with simultaneous PET/MR than with PET/CT, especially in the bone and pelvis. These promising findings suggest that [¹¹C]choline PET/MR might have a diagnostic benefit compared to PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer, and now needs to be further evaluated in prospective trials.     

Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) compared to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging

Purpose

The aim of the study was to prospectively compare the diagnostic value of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and FDG PET/CT for breast cancer (BC) staging.

Methods

Twenty BC patients underwent whole-body FDG PET/CT and 1.5-T DWI. Lesions with qualitatively elevated signal intensity on DW images (b?=?800 s/mm²) were rated as suspicious for tumour and mapped to individual lesions and different compartments (overall 552 lesions). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value was determined for quantitative evaluation. Histopathology, MRI findings, bone scan findings, concordant findings between FDG PET/CT and DWI, CT follow-up scans and plausibility served as the standards of reference defining malignancy.

Results

According to the standards of reference, breasts harboured malignancy in 11, regional lymph nodes in 4, M1 lymph nodes in 3, bone in 7, lung in 2, liver in 3 and other tissues in 3 patients. On a compartment basis, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the detection of malignancies were 94, 99, 98, 97 and 98% for FDG PET/CT and 91, 72, 76, 50 and 96% for DWI, respectively. Of the lesions seen on DWI only, 348 (82%) turned out to be false-positive compared to 23 (11%) on FDG PET/CT. The average lesion ADC was 820?±?300 with true-positive lesions having 929?±?252 vs 713?±?305 in false-positive lesions (p?<?0.0001).

Conclusion

Based on these initial data DWI seems to be a sensitive but unspecific modality for the detection of locoregional or metastatic BC disease. There was no possibility to quantitatively distinguish lesions using ADC. DWI alone may not be recommended as a whole-body staging alternative to FDG PET(/CT). Further studies are necessary addressing the question of whether full-body MRI including DWI may become an alternative to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging.     

Diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorothymidine PET/CT for primary colorectal cancer and its lymph node metastasis: comparison with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT

Purpose

To examine the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET/CT in primary and metastatic lymph node colorectal cancer foci in comparison with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT.

Methods

The study population comprised 28 patients with 30 newly diagnosed colorectal cancers who underwent surgical resection of the primary lesion and regional lymph nodes after both FLT and FDG PET/CT. The associations between SUVmax levels and pathological factors were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis test. Differences in diagnostic indexes for detecting nodal metastasis between the two tracers were estimated using the McNemar exact or χ ² test.

Results

All 30 primary cancers (43.0?±?20.0 mm, range 14 – 85 mm) were visualized by both tracers, but none of the FLT SUVmax values exceeded the FDG SUVmax values in any of the primary cancers (6.6?±?2.4 vs. 13.6?±?5.8, p?<?0.001). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for detecting nodal metastasis were 41 % (15/37), 98.8 % (493/499) and 94.8 % (508/536) for FDG PET/CT, and 32 % (12/37), 98.8 % (493/499) and 94.2 % (505/536) for FLT PET/CT, respectively. The sensitivity (p?=?0.45), specificity (p?=?0.68) and accuracy (p?=?0.58) were not different between the tracers. Nodal uptake of FLT and FDG was discordant in 7 (19 %) of 37 metastatic nodes. There were ten concordant true-positive nodes of which six showed higher FDG SUVmax and four showed higher FLT SUVmax, but the difference between FDG and FLT SUVmax was not significant (5.56?±?3.55 and 3.62?±?1.45, respectively; p?=?0.22).

Conclusion

FLT has the same potential as FDG in PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and nodal foci of colorectal cancer despite significantly lower FLT uptake in primary foci.     

18F-FDG PET/CT imaging versus dynamic contrast-enhanced CT for staging and prognosis of inflammatory breast cancer

Purpose

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive type of breast cancer with a poor prognosis. Locoregional staging is based on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) CT or MRI. The aim of this study was to compare the performances of FDG PET/CT and DCE CT in locoregional staging of IBC and to assess their respective prognostic values.

Methods

The study group comprised 50 women (median age: 51?±?11 years) followed in our institution for IBC who underwent FDG PET/CT and DCE CT scans (median interval 5?±?9 days). CT enhancement parameters were net maximal enhancement, net early enhancement and perfusion.

Results

The PET/CT scans showed intense FDG uptake in all primary tumours. Concordance rate between PET/CT and DCE CT for breast tumour localization was 92 %. No significant correlation was found between SUVmax and CT enhancement parameters in primary tumours (p?>?0.6). PET/CT and DCE CT results were poorly correlated for skin infiltration (kappa?=?0.19). Ipsilateral foci of increased axillary FDG uptake were found in 47 patients (median SUV: 7.9?±?5.4), whereas enlarged axillary lymph nodes were observed on DCE CT in 43 patients. Results for axillary node involvement were fairly well correlated (kappa?=?0.55). Nineteen patients (38 %) were found to be metastatic on PET/CT scan with a significant shorter progression-free survival than patients without distant lesions (p?=?0.01). In the primary tumour, no statistically significant difference was observed between high and moderate tumour FDG uptake on survival, using an SUVmax cut-off of 5 (p?=?0.7 and 0.9), or between high and low tumour enhancement on DCE CT (p?>?0.8).

Conclusion

FDG PET/CT imaging provided additional information concerning locoregional involvement to that provided by DCE CT on and allowed detection of distant metastases in the same whole-body procedure. Tumour FDG uptake or CT enhancement parameters were not correlated and were not found to have any prognostic value.     

Clinical value of 11C-methionine PET/CT in patients with plasma cell malignancy: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT

Purpose

PET/CT using FDG has been widely used for the imaging of various malignant tumours, including plasma cell malignancy (PCM), but ¹¹C-methionine (MET), as a radiolabelled amino acid tracer, may also be useful because PCM is able to activate protein synthesis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of PET/CT imaging using MET in PCM, including multiple myeloma, compared with that of FDG PET/CT.

Methods

The study group comprised 20 patients with histologically proven PCM who underwent FDG PET/CT and MET PET/CT scans before (n?=?6) or after (n?=?14) treatment. Semiquantitative analysis was performed on a lesion basis. We also visually evaluated the scans qualitatively using a five-point scale (0, negative; 1, probably negative; 2, equivocal; 3, probably positive; 4, positive) on a lesion and a patient basis. The results were compared between the two scans.

Results

Active PCM was confirmed in 15 patients, including two patients with extramedullary lesions. Uptake of MET tended to be higher (maximum standardized uptake value 10.3 ± 5.6, mean ± SD) than that of FDG (3.4 ± 2.7, p?<?0.001), and more lesions of grade 3 or 4 were depicted by MET (MET 156 lesions vs. FDG 58 lesions). On a patient basis, two patients were accurately diagnosed only by MET. In the remaining 18 patients, consistent results were obtained, but potential upgrade of staging or restaging was necessary in 6 of 11 positive patients because more abnormal lesions were demonstrated by MET. The patient-based sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MET for restaging were 89 %, 100 % and 93 %, respectively, while those of FDG were 78 %, 100 % and 86 %, respectively.

Conclusion

MET revealed an equal or greater number of lesions in PCM than FDG. MET may be especially useful when negative or inconclusive findings are obtained by FDG despite highly suspicious indications of recurrence.     

Detection and quantification of focal uptake in head and neck tumours: 18F-FDG PET/MR versus PET/CT

Purpose

Our objectives were to assess the quality of PET images and coregistered anatomic images obtained with PET/MR, to evaluate the detection of focal uptake and SUV, and to compare these findings with those of PET/CT in patients with head and neck tumours.

Methods

The study group comprised 32 consecutive patients with malignant head and neck tumours who underwent whole-body ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR and PET/CT. PET images were reconstructed using the attenuation correction sequence for PET/MR and CT for PET/CT. Two experienced observers evaluated the anonymized data. They evaluated image and fusion quality, lesion conspicuity, anatomic location, number and size of categorized (benign versus assumed malignant) lesions with focal uptake. Region of interest (ROI) analysis was performed to determine SUVs of lesions and organs for both modalities. Statistical analysis considered data clustering due to multiple lesions per patient.

Results

PET/MR coregistration and image fusion was feasible in all patients. The analysis included 66 malignant lesions (tumours, metastatic lymph nodes and distant metastases), 136 benign lesions and 470 organ ROIs. There was no statistically significant difference between PET/MR and PET/CT regarding rating scores for image quality, fusion quality, lesion conspicuity or anatomic location, number of detected lesions and number of patients with and without malignant lesions. A high correlation was observed for SUV_mean and SUV_max measured on PET/MR and PET/CT for malignant lesions, benign lesions and organs (ρ?=?0.787 to 0.877, p?<?0.001). SUV_mean and SUV_max measured on PET/MR were significantly lower than on PET/CT for malignant tumours, metastatic neck nodes, benign lesions, bone marrow, and liver (p?<?0.05). The main factor affecting the difference between SUVs in malignant lesions was tumour size (p?<?0.01).

Conclusion

In patients with head and neck tumours, PET/MR showed equivalent performance to PET/CT in terms of qualitative results. Comparison of SUVs revealed an excellent correlation for measurements on both modalities, but underestimation of SUVs measured on PET/MR as compared to PET/CT.     

Discrimination and anatomical mapping of PET-positive lesions: comparison of CT attenuation-corrected PET images with coregistered MR and CT images in the abdomen

Purpose

PET/MR has the potential to become a powerful tool in clinical oncological imaging. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the performance of a single T1-weighted (T1w) fat-suppressed unenhanced MR pulse sequence of the abdomen in comparison with unenhanced low-dose CT images to characterize PET-positive lesions.

Methods

A total of 100 oncological patients underwent sequential whole-body ¹⁸F-FDG PET with CT-based attenuation correction (AC), 40?mAs low-dose CT and two-point Dixon-based T1w 3D MRI of the abdomen in a trimodality PET/CT-MR system. PET-positive lesions were assessed by CT and MRI with regard to their anatomical location, conspicuity and additional relevant information for characterization.

Results

From among 66 patients with at least one PET-positive lesion, 147 lesions were evaluated. No significant difference between MRI and CT was found regarding anatomical lesion localization. The MR pulse sequence used performed significantly better than CT regarding conspicuity of liver lesions (p?<?0.001, Wilcoxon signed ranks test), whereas no difference was noted for extrahepatic lesions. For overall lesion characterization, MRI was considered superior to CT in 40?% of lesions, equal to CT in 49?%, and inferior to CT in 11?%.

Conclusion

Fast Dixon-based T1w MRI outperformed low-dose CT in terms of conspicuity and characterization of PET-positive liver lesions and performed similarly in extrahepatic tumour manifestations. Hence, under the assumption that the technical issue of MR AC for whole-body PET examinations is solved, in abdominal PET/MR imaging the replacement of low-dose CT by a single Dixon-based MR pulse sequence for anatomical lesion correlation appears to be valid and robust.     

Value of a Dixon-based MR/PET attenuation correction sequence for the localization and evaluation of PET-positive lesions

Purpose

In this study, the potential contribution of Dixon-based MR imaging with a rapid low-resolution breath-hold sequence, which is a technique used for MR-based attenuation correction (AC) for MR/positron emission tomography (PET), was evaluated for anatomical correlation of PET-positive lesions on a 3T clinical scanner compared to low-dose CT. This technique is also used in a recently installed fully integrated whole-body MR/PET system.

Methods

Thirty-five patients routinely scheduled for oncological staging underwent ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and a 2-point Dixon 3-D volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) T1-weighted MR sequence on the same day. Two PET data sets reconstructed using attenuation maps from low-dose CT (PET_{AC_CT}) or simulated MR-based segmentation (PET_{AC_MR}) were evaluated for focal PET-positive lesions. The certainty for the correlation with anatomical structures was judged in the low-dose CT and Dixon-based MRI on a 4-point scale (0?C3). In addition, the standardized uptake values (SUVs) for PET_{AC_CT} and PET_{AC_MR} were compared.

Results

Statistically, no significant difference could be found concerning anatomical localization for all 81 PET-positive lesions in low-dose CT compared to Dixon-based MR (mean 2.51?±?0.85 and 2.37?±?0.87, respectively; p?=?0.1909). CT tended to be superior for small lymph nodes, bone metastases and pulmonary nodules, while Dixon-based MR proved advantageous for soft tissue pathologies like head/neck tumours and liver metastases. For the PET_{AC_CT}- and PET_{AC_MR}-based SUVs (mean 6.36?±?4.47 and 6.31?±?4.52, respectively) a nearly complete concordance with a highly significant correlation was found (r?=?0.9975, p?Conclusion Dixon-based MR imaging for MR AC allows for anatomical allocation of PET-positive lesions similar to low-dose CT in conventional PET/CT. Thus, this approach appears to be useful for future MR/PET for body regions not fully covered by diagnostic MRI due to potential time constraints.     

18F-FDG PET as a single imaging modality in pediatric neuroblastoma: comparison with abdomen CT and bone scintigraphy

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) as a single imaging agent in neuroblastoma in comparison with other imaging modalities.

Methods

A total of 30 patients with pathologically proven neuroblastoma who underwent FDG PET for staging were enrolled. Diagnostic performance of FDG PET and abdomen CT was compared in detecting soft tissue lesions. FDG PET and bone scintigraphy (BS) were compared in bone metastases. Maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of primary or recurrent lesions was calculated for quantitative analysis.

Results

Tumor FDG uptake was detected in 29 of 30 patients with primary neuroblastoma. On initial FDG PET, SUVmax of primary lesions were lower in early stage (I–II) than in late stage (III–IV) (3.03 vs. 5.45, respectively, p = 0.019). FDG PET was superior to CT scan in detecting distant lymph nodes (23 vs. 18 from 23 lymph nodes). FDG PET showed higher accuracy to identify bone metastases than BS both on patient-based analyses (100 vs. 94.4 % in sensitivity, 100 vs. 77.8 % in specificity), and on lesion-based analyses (FDG PET: 203 lesions, BS: 86 lesions). Sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET to detect recurrence were 87.5 % and 93.8, respectively.

Conclusion

FDG PET was superior to CT in detecting distant LN metastasis and to BS in detecting skeletal metastasis in neuroblastoma. BS might be eliminated in the evaluation of neuroblastoma when FDG PET is performed.     

Whole-body FDG PET/CT is more accurate than conventional imaging for staging primary breast cancer patients

Purpose

This retrospective study aimed (1) to compare the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body FDG PET/CT for initial breast cancer staging with the accuracy of a conventional, multimodal imaging algorithm, and (2) to assess potential alteration in patient management based on the FDG PET/CT findings.

Methods

Patients with primary breast cancer (106 women, mean age 57?±?13?years) underwent whole-body FDG PET/CT and conventional imaging (X-ray mammography, MR mammography, chest plain radiography, bone scintigraphy and breast, axillary and liver ultrasonography). The diagnostic accuracies of FDG PET/CT and a conventional algorithm were compared. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed in terms of primary tumour detection rate, correct assessment of primary lesion focality, T stage and the detection rates for lymph node and distant metastases. Histopathology, imaging or clinical follow-up served as the standards of reference.

Results

FDG PET/CT was significantly more accurate for detecting axillary lymph node and distant metastases (p?=?0.0125 and p?Conclusion Full-dose, intravenous contrast-enhanced FDG PET/CT was more accurate than conventional imaging for initial breast cancer staging due to the higher detection rate of metastases and synchronous tumours, although the study had several limitations including a retrospective design, a possible selection bias and a relevant false-positive rate for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases. FDG PET/CT resulted in a change of treatment in a substantial proportion of patients.     

The role of 18F-fluoride PET-CT in the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast, lung and prostate carcinoma: a comparison with FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan

Objectives

We aimed to compare the role of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT, FDG PET/CT and ^99mTc-MDP bone scans in the detection of bone metastases in patients with lung, breast and prostate carcinoma.

Methods

This was a prospective study including patients for staging (S) and restaging (R). Seventy-two patients (23S, 49R) with infiltrating ductal breast carcinoma, 49 patients (25S, 24R) with prostate adenocarcinoma and 30 patients (17S, 13R) with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), without known bone metastases but with high risk/clinical suspicion for the same, underwent a ^99mTc-MDP bone scan, FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT within 2 weeks. All scans were reviewed by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians, and the findings were correlated with MRI/thin-slice CT/skeletal survey. Histological verification was done wherever feasible.

Results

Sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT was 100 % in all three malignancies, while that of FDG PET/CT was 79 % and 73 % in NSCLC, 73 % and 80 % in breast cancer and 72 and 65 % in prostate cancer. Specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of FDG PET/CT were 100 % in NSCLC and prostate and 97 % and 96 % in breast cancer. As compared to the ^99mTc-MDP bone scan, all parameters were superior for ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT in prostate and breast cancer, but sensitivity and NPV were equal in NSCLC. The MDP bone scan had superior sensitivity and NPV compared to FDG PET/CT but had low specificity and PPV.

Conclusion

To rule out bone metastases in cases where there is a high index of suspicion, ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT is the most reliable investigation. ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT has the potential to replace the ^99mTc-MDP bone scan for the detection of bone metastases.     

Quantitative assessment of atherosclerotic plaques on <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET/MRI: comparison with a PET/CT hybrid system

Purpose

PET with ¹⁸F-FDG has the potential to assess vascular macrophage metabolism. ¹⁸F-FDG is most often used in combination with contrast-enhanced CT to localize increased metabolism to specific arterial lesions. Novel ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI hybrid imaging shows high potential for the combined evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques, due to the superior morphological conspicuity of plaque lesions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI uptake quantification compared to PET/CT as a reference standard in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaques.

Methods

The study group comprised 34 consecutive oncological patients with carotid plaques who underwent both PET/CT and PET/MRI with ¹⁸F-FDG on the same day. The presence of atherosclerotic plaques was confirmed by 3 T MRI scans. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUV_max) for carotid plaque lesions and the average SUV of the blood pool within the adjacent internal jugular vein were determined and target-to-blood ratios (TBRs, plaque to blood pool) were calculated.

Results

Atherosclerotic lesions with maximum colocalized focal FDG uptake were assessed in each patient. SUV_max values of carotid plaque lesions were significantly lower on PET/MRI than on PET/CT (2.3?±?0.6 vs. 3.1?±?0.6; P?<?0.01), but were significantly correlated between PET/CT and PET/MRI (Spearman’s r?=?0.67, P?<?0.01). In contrast, TBR_max values of plaque lesions were similar on PET/MRI and on PET/CT (2.2?±?0.3 vs. 2.2?±?0.3; P?=?0.4), and again were significantly correlated between PET/MRI and PET/CT (Spearman’s r?=?0.73, P?<?0.01). Considering the increasing trend in SUV_max and TBR_max values from early to delayed imaging time-points on PET/CT and PET/MRI, respectively, with continuous clearance of radioactivity from the blood, a slight underestimation of TBR_max values may also be expected with PET/MRI compared with PET/CT.

Conclusion

SUV_max and TBR_max values are widely accepted reference parameters for estimation of the radioactivity of atherosclerotic plaques on PET/CT. However, due to a systematic underestimation of SUV_max and TBR_max with PET/MRI, the optimal cut-off values indicating the presence of inflamed plaque tissue need to be newly defined for PET/MRI.

     

Evaluation of <Superscript>68</Superscript>Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI for whole-body staging of neuroendocrine tumours in comparison with <Superscript>68</Superscript>Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT

Objectives

To compare the diagnostic performance of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in the whole-body staging of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NET).

Methods

Thirty patients with histopathologically confirmed NET underwent PET/CT and PET/MRI in a single-injection protocol. PET/CT and PET/MRI scans were prospectively evaluated with regard to lesion count, localization, nature (NET/non-NET), and conspicuity (four-point scale). Histopathology and follow-up imaging served as the reference standards. The proportions of NET and non-NET lesions rated correctly were compared using McNemar’s chi-squared test. The Wilcoxon test was used to assess differences in SUVmax and lesion conspicuity. The correlation between the SUVmax for the same lesions from each modality was analysed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r).

Results

According to the reference standard, there were 197 lesions (142 NET, 55 non-NET). Lesion-based analysis showed a higher proportion of correctly rated NET lesions on PET/MRI than on PET/CT (90.8% vs. 86.7%, p?=?0.031), whereas on PET/CT there was a higher proportion of correctly rated non-NET lesions (94.5% vs. 83.6%, p?=?0.031). SUVmax was strongly correlated (r?=?0.86; p?<?0.001) and did not differ significantly (p?=?0.35) between the modalities. Overall conspicuity and NET lesion conspicuity were higher on PET/MRI (both p?<?0.01).

Conclusions

Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI yielded a higher proportion of correctly rated NET lesions and should be regarded as a valuable alternative to ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in whole-body staging of NET patients.

Key Points

? ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI correctly identified more NET lesions than ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. ? ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI provides better NET lesion conspicuity than ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. ? SUVmax values from the two modalities are strongly correlated and do not differ significantly.

     

Complementary roles of tumour specific PET tracer 18F-FAMT to 18F-FDG PET/CT for the assessment of bone metastasis

Purpose

The usefulness of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for bone metastasis evaluation has already been established. The amino acid PET tracer [¹⁸F]-3-fluoro-alpha-methyl tyrosine (¹⁸F-FAMT) has been reported to be highly specific for malignancy. We evaluated the additional value of ¹⁸F-FAMT PET/CT to complement ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastasis.

Methods

This retrospective study included 21 patients with bone metastases of various cancers who had undergone both ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-FAMT PET/CT within 1 month of each other. ¹⁸F-FDG-avid bone lesions suspicious for malignancy were carefully selected based on the cut-off value for malignancy, and the SUVmax of the ¹⁸F-FAMT in the corresponding lesions were evaluated.

Results

A total of 72 ¹⁸F-FDG-positive bone lesions suspected to be metastases in the 21 patients were used as the reference standard. ¹⁸F-FAMT uptake was found in 87.5 % of the lesions. In the lesions of lung cancer origin, the uptake of the two tracers showed a good correlation (40 lesions, r?=?0.68, P?<?0.01). Bone metastatic lesions of oesophageal cancer showed the highest average of ¹⁸F-FAMT uptake. Bone metastatic lesions of squamous cell carcinoma showed higher ¹⁸F-FAMT uptake than those of adenocarcinoma. No significant difference in ¹⁸F-FAMT uptake was seen between osteoblastic and osteolytic bone metastatic lesions.

Conclusion

The usefulness of ¹⁸F-FAMT PET/CT for bone metastasis detection regardless of the lesion phenotype was demonstrated. The fact that ¹⁸F-FAMT uptake was confirmed by ¹⁸F-FDG uptake suggests that ¹⁸F-FAMT PET/CT has the potential to complement ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases.     

Direct comparison of [18F]FDG PET/CT with PET alone and with side-by-side PET and CT in patients with malignant melanoma

Purpose

The purpose of this retrospective, blinded study was to evaluate the additional value of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in comparison with PET alone and with side-by-side PET and CT in patients with malignant melanoma (MM).

Methods

A total of 127 consecutive studies of patients with known MM referred for a whole-body PET/CT examination were included in this study. PET alone, side-by-side PET and CT and integrated PET/CT study were independently and separately interpreted without awareness of the clinical information. One score each was applied for certainty of lesion localisation and for certainty of lesion characterisation. Verification of the findings was subsequently performed using all available clinical, pathological (n?=?30) and follow-up information.

Results

The number of lesions with an uncertain localisation was significantly (p?p?p?=?0.057) compared versus PET alone. Respectively, PET, side-by-side PET and CT and PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 86%, 89% and 91%, a specificity of 94%, 94% and 94%, a positive predictive value of 96%, 96% and 96% and a negative predictive value of 80%, 83% and 87%.

Conclusion

Integrated PET/CT offers a significant benefit in lesion localisation and an improvement in lesion characterisation compared with PET alone or with side-by-side PET and CT. The benefit is not as great as that reported for other tumour entities, which may be due to the high avidity of MM for [¹⁸F]FDG.     

Protocol requirements and diagnostic value of PET/MR imaging for liver metastasis detection

Purpose

To compare the accuracy of PET/MR imaging with that of FDG PET/CT and to determine the MR sequences necessary for the detection of liver metastasis using a trimodality PET/CT/MR set-up.

Methods

Included in this single-centre IRB-approved study were 55 patients (22 women, age 61?±?11 years) with suspected liver metastases from gastrointestinal cancer. Imaging using a trimodality PET/CT/MR set-up (time-of-flight PET/CT and 3-T whole-body MR imager) comprised PET, low-dose CT, contrast-enhanced (CE) CT of the abdomen, and MR with T1-W/T2-W, diffusion-weighted (DWI), and dynamic CE imaging. Two readers evaluated the following image sets for liver metastasis: PET/CT (set A), PET/CECT (B), PET/MR including T1-W/T2-W (C), T1-W/T2-W with either DWI (D) or CE imaging (E), and a combination (F). The accuracy of each image set was determined by receiver-operating characteristic analysis using image set B as the standard of reference.

Results

Of 120 liver lesions in 21/55 patients (38 %), 79 (66 %) were considered malignant, and 63/79 (80 %) showed abnormal FDG uptake. Accuracies were 0.937 (95 % CI 89.5 – 97.9 %) for image set A, 1.00 (95 % CI 99.9 – 100.0 %) for set C, 0.998 (95 % CI 99.4 – 100.0 %) for set D, 0.997 (95 % CI 99.3 – 100.0 %) for set E, and 0.995 (95 % CI 99.0 – 100.0 %) for set F. Differences were significant for image sets D – F (P?<?0.05) when including lesions without abnormal FDG uptake. As shown by follow-up imaging after 50 – 177 days, the use of image sets D and both sets E and F led to the detection of metastases in one and three patients, respectively, and further metastases in the contralateral lobe in two patients negative on PET/CECT (P?=?0.06).

Conclusion

PET/MR imaging with T1-W/T2-W sequences results in similar diagnostic accuracy for the detection of liver metastases to PET/CECT. To significantly improve the characterization of liver lesions, we recommend the use of dynamic CE imaging sequences. PET/MR imaging has a diagnostic impact on clinical decision making.     

Incidental pituitary uptake on whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT: a multicentre study

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of incidental pituitary uptake on whole-body ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and to investigate its clinical significance.

Methods

The files of 40,967 patients who underwent whole-body FDG PET/CT were retrospectively reviewed. Quantification of pituitary metabolic activity was obtained by using the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max). Hormone assays and pituitary MRIs were performed to assess pituitary lesions.

Results

Focally increased pituitary FDG uptake on PET/CT was found in 30 of 40,967 patients, accounting for an incidence of 0.073%. The mean SUV_max of 30 patients was 8.9?±?6.6 (range: 3.2–32.6). Histological diagnosis was obtained in three patients and included two growth hormone-secreting adenomas and one non-functioning adenoma. Hormone assays were performed on serum samples from 11 patients, 2 of whom were shown to have hypersecretion of pituitary hormone. MRI was performed on 19 patients. Abnormal MRI findings suggesting a pituitary mass were found in 18 of 19 cases (94.7%). The mean SUV_max calculated without correction for partial volume effect for macroadenomas was significantly higher than the SUV_max for microadenomas (11.5?±?8.4 vs 4.8?±?1.3; p?<?0.05). There were no cases diagnosed with metastasis to the pituitary gland during clinical follow-up.

Conclusion

Incidental pituitary FDG uptake was a very rare finding. Cases with incidental pituitary FDG uptake were diagnosed primarily with clinically non-functioning adenomas, and there were also a few functioning adenomas. Further evaluations, including hormone assays and pituitary MRI, are warranted when pituitary uptake is found on FDG PET/CT.     

Usefulness of 18F-fluoride PET/CT in Breast Cancer Patients with Osteosclerotic Bone Metastases

Purpose

Bone metastasis is an important factor for the treatment and prognosis of breast cancer patients. Whole-body bone scintigraphy (WBBS) can evaluate skeletal metastases, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT seems to exhibit high specificity and accuracy in detecting bone metastases. However, there is a limitation of ¹⁸F-FDG PET in assessing sclerotic bone metastases because some lesions may be undetectable. Recent studies showed that ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT is more sensitive than WBBS in detecting bone metastases. This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT by comparing it with WBBS and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients with osteosclerotic skeletal metastases.

Materials and Methods

Nine breast cancer patients with suspected bone metastases (9 females; mean age ± SD, 55.6 ± 10.0 years) underwent ^99mTc-MDP WBBS, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT. Lesion-based analysis of five regions of the skeletons (skull, vertebral column, thoracic cage, pelvic bones and long bones of extremities) and patient-based analysis were performed.

Results

¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and WBBS detected 49, 20 and 25 true metastases, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT were 94.2 %, 46.3 %, 57.7 % and 91.2 %, respectively. Most true metastatic lesions on ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT had osteosclerotic change (45/49, 91.8 %), and only four lesions showed osteolytic change. Most lesions on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT also demonstrated osteosclerotic change (17/20, 85.0 %) with three osteolytic lesions. All true metastatic lesions detected on WBBS and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were identified on ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT.

Conclusion

¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT is superior to WBBS or ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in detecting osteosclerotic metastatic lesions. ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT might be useful in evaluating osteosclerotic metastases in breast cancer patients.     

Malignancy rate of biopsied suspicious bone lesions identified on FDG PET/CT

Purpose

To determine the malignancy rate of bone lesions identified on FDG PET/CT in patients who have undergone CT-guided biopsy because of the suspicion of malignancy.

Methods

This single-centre retrospective study spanned eight consecutive years and included all patients who underwent both FDG PET/CT and CT-guided bone biopsy because of the suspicion of malignancy. The positive predictive value (PPV) for malignancy was calculated, and different patient and imaging characteristics were compared between malignant and benign bone lesions.

Results

Of 102 included patients with bone lesions that all showed FDG uptake exceeding mediastinal uptake, bone biopsy showed a malignant lesion in 91 patients, yielding a PPV for malignancy of 89.2 % (95 % CI 81.7 – 93.9 %). In the 94 patients with bone lesions that showed FDG uptake exceeding liver uptake, bone biopsy showed a malignant lesion in 83 patients, yielding a PPV for malignancy of 88.3 % (95 % CI 80.1 – 93.5 %). Higher age, bone marrow replacement of the lesion seen on CT, expansion of the lesion seen on CT, and presence of multifocal lesions on FDG PET/CT were significantly more frequent in patients with malignant lesions than in those with benign bone lesions (P?=?0.044, P?=?0.009, P?=?0.015, and P?=?0.019, respectively). Furthermore, there was a trend towards a higher incidence of cortical destruction (P?=?0.056) and surrounding soft tissue mass (P?=?0.063) in patients with malignant bone lesions.

Conclusion

The PPV for malignancy of suspicious bone lesions identified on FDG PET/CT is not sufficiently high to justify changes in patient management without histopathological confirmation. Nevertheless, ancillary patient and imaging characteristics may increase the likelihood of a malignant bone lesion.

     

11C-Acetate as a new biomarker for PET/CT in patients with multiple myeloma: initial staging and postinduction response assessment

Purpose

We investigated the potential value of ¹¹C-acetate (ACT) PET/CT in characterizing multiple myeloma (MM) compared with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Bone marrow histological and whole-body (WB) MRI findings served as the reference standards.

Methods

In this prospective study, 15 untreated MM patients (10 men and 5 women, age range 48?69 years) underwent dual-tracer ¹¹C-ACT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and WB MRI for pretreatment staging, and 13 of them had repeated examinations after induction therapy. Diffuse and focal bone marrow uptake was assessed by visual and quantitative analyses, including measurement of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max). Between-group differences and correlations were assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test and the Pearson test.

Results

At staging, all 15 patients had diffuse myeloma involvement upon bone marrow examination with 30–90 % of plasma cell infiltrates. Diffuse infiltration was detected in all of them (100 %) using ¹¹C-ACT with a positive correlation between bone marrow uptake values and percentages of plasma cell infiltrates (r = +0.63, p?=?0.01). In contrast, a diagnosis of diffuse infiltration could be established using ¹⁸F-FDG in only six patients (40 %). Focal lesions were shown in 13 patients on both ¹¹C-ACT PET/CT and WB MRI, and in 10 patients on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Focal lesions demonstrated ¹¹C-ACT uptake with a mean SUV_max of 11.4 ± 3.3 (range 4.6?19.6, n?=?59), which was significantly higher than the ¹⁸F-FDG uptake (mean SUV_max 6.6 ± 3.1, range 2.3?13.7, n?=?29; p?<?0.0001). After treatment, the diffuse bone marrow ¹¹C-ACT uptake showed a mean SUV_max reduction of 66 % in patients with at least a very good partial response versus 34 % in those with at most a partial response only (p?=?0.01).

Conclusion

PET/CT using ¹¹C-ACT as a biomarker showed a higher detection rate for both diffuse and focal myeloma lesions at diagnosis than using ¹⁸F-FDG, and may be valuable for response assessment.