Preemptive Strategy for Ganciclovir Administration Against Cytomegalovirus in Liver Transplantation Recipients

In utilizing a preemptive strategy to minimize the occurrence of symptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection following liver transplant, only patients with proven CMV activity by direct detection are treated. We applied the following preemptive strategy for CMV infection to 49 sequential liver transplant recipients between 1998 and 2001. Patients were monitored for CMV activity using CMV p65 antigen assay for the first 10 months of the study. Thereafter, we changed the detection method to a quantitative PCR for plasma CMV-DNA. All patients were monitored post transplant, weekly for the first 3 months and then monthly. Only patients with detected CMV activity were treated with ganciclovir. Patients were divided into four groups, based on donor (D) and recipient (R) CMV status. In seven out of 49 patients (14.3%) CMV activity was detected: four in group D+/R-, and three in group D-/R-. Five out of these seven patients had asymptomatic CMV infection. Symptomatic CMV infection developed only in two of these seven patients, to give total rate of 4.1% (2/49). All seven patients developed CMV IgG antibody. 'Transient' CMV replication detected by PCR in five patients in group D+/R+ was not defined as infection. No patients developed organ-invasive CMV disease. The cost of anti-CMV treatment using the preemptive strategy was $1000/patient/1st year. Using preemptive strategy, early detection of CMV infection was achieved, allowing timely treatment. The use of ganciclovir for CMV infection in only 4.3% of the patients should have a positive impact on minimizing the risk of ganciclovir-resistant virus, and should reduce the cost of CMV prevention strategies.     

Prophylaxis versus preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus disease in high-risk liver transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an opportunistic infection frequently found after solid organ transplantation, and it contributes significantly to mortality and morbidity. CMV-seronegative recipients of grafts from CMV-seropositive donors have the highest risk of CMV disease. The most appropriate strategy for preventing CMV disease in this population is a matter of active debate. In this study, we compared prophylaxis and preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV disease in donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative (D(+) /R(-) ) liver recipients. To this end, we selected a retrospective cohort of liver recipients (1992-2009) for analysis. D(+) /R(-) patients were identified from the liver transplant program database. Eighty of 878 consecutive liver recipients (9%) were D(+) /R(-) . Six of these patients died within 30 days of transplantation and were excluded. Thirty-five of the remaining D(+) /R(-) patients (47%) received prophylaxis, and 39 patients (53%) followed a preemptive strategy based on CMV antigenemia surveillance. Fifty-four (73%) were men, the median age was 49 years (range = 15-68 years), and the mean follow-up was 68 months (range = 8-214 months). The baseline characteristics and the initial immunosuppressive regimens were similar for the 2 groups. Ganciclovir or valganciclovir was the antiviral drug used initially in both strategy groups. CMV disease occurred more frequently among D(+) /R(-) liver recipients receiving preemptive therapy (33.3% versus 8.6% for the prophylaxis group, P = 0.01), whereas late-onset CMV disease was found only in patients receiving prophylaxis (5.7% versus 0% for the preemptive therapy group, P = 0.22). No significant differences in acute allograft rejection, other opportunistic infections, or case fatality rates were observed. According to our data, prophylaxis was more effective than preemptive therapy in preventing CMV disease in high-risk liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl, 2012. ? 2012 AASLD.     

Who among cytomegalovirus-seropositive liver transplant recipients is at risk for cytomegalovirus infection?

A vast majority of the transplant recipients are cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive (R+). We sought to assess variables predictive of CMV infection, specifically in R+ liver transplant recipients. Study patients comprised 182 consecutive liver transplant recipients who survived at least 14 days after transplantation. Surveillance testing was used to detect CMV infection. Pre-emptive therapy was employed for the prevention of CMV disease, however, no antiviral prophylaxis was used for CMV infection. CMV infection developed in 32.5% (38 of 117) of R+ patients, 84.6% (33 of 39) of R-/D+, and 3.8% (1 of 26) of R-/D- patients. In R+ patients, Hispanic race (21.6% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.06), donor CMV seropositivity (73.7% vs. 45.6%, P = 0.005), and hepatocellular carcinoma (23.7% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.05) correlated with a higher risk of CMV infection. In a multivariate model, Hispanic race (OR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.03-11.6, P = 0.045), donor CMV serostatus (OR: 4.0, 95% CI: 1.6-10.2, P = 0.003) and hepatocellular carcinoma (OR: 5.8, 95% CI: 1.6-20.5, P = 0.006) were all significant independent predictors of CMV infection. The aforementioned variables did not portend a higher risk of CMV infection in R-/D+ patients; donor CMV seropositivity overwhelmed all other risk factors in R- patients (P < 0.00001). In conclusion, CMV-seropositive liver transplant recipients at risk for CMV infection can be identified based on readily assessable variables. Preventive strategies may be selectively targeted toward these patients.     

The association between cytomegalovirus infection and atherosclerotic events in renal transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a risk factor for arteriosclerosis in renal transplant recipients. We sought to investigate the effects of CMV infection on atherosclerotic events (AE) in renal transplant recipients. This retrospective analysis included 200 patients: 52 women and 148 men of overall mean age of 36.18 +/- 10.23 years who were transplanted at our center between 1998 and 2001. We analyzed demographic features, dialysis duration, diabetes, blood pressure level, body mass index (BMI), medications, and lipid parameters. CMV infection was diagnosed in 23.5% of patients in the first 2 years after transplantation; these patients were followed for 4 years. All patients had been assessed for AE, including previous myocardial infarction, angina, revascularization procedures, intermittent claudication, stroke, or transient ischemic attack. AE occurred in 13% during the follow-up period. CMV infection was more frequent among these patients compared to those without AE, namely 42.3% versus 20.6%, respectively. Although the gender, dialysis duration, serum cholesterol level, presence of acute rejection, and BMI were not associated with AE, age, hypertension, and CMV infection did show a relation. A multivariate analysis by logistic regression revealed mean age and CMV infection to be independent risk factors for AE: odds ratio (OR)=5.6, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.3 to 24.6 (P=0.02) and OR=4, 95% CI = 1.3 to 12.3 (P=.01). This study suggested that the presence of CMV infection may be a triggering factor for AE in renal transplant recipients.     

Reduced risk of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients treated with sirolimus: a pooled analysis of clinical trials

INTRODUCTION: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an opportunistic infection that causes substantial morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. This pooled analysis of Wyeth clinical trials explored the incidence of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients treated with sirolimus versus comparator immunosuppressant drugs. METHODS: Wyeth-conducted, multicenter, randomized, comparative trials with at least one non-sirolimus-containing arm and at least 6 months' complete data were included. Cases of CMV were investigator-identified. The occurrence of CMV in sirolimus-treated patients was assessed versus all other comparator agents, versus antimetabolite agents, and versus calcineurin inhibitors. RESULTS: Nine trials in recipients of renal, liver, and cardiac transplants met the inclusion criteria; eight enrolled de novo allograft recipients, and one was a conversion trial. The primary pooled analysis revealed an odd ratio for CMV infection of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42 to 1.0, P = .047) on sirolimus versus comparator immunosuppressant drugs. The subanalysis of sirolimus versus antimetabolites showed an odds ratio for CMV of 0.39 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.81, P = .012), and for sirolimus versus calcineurin inhibitors the odds ratio was 0.58 (95% CI 0.34 to 1.01, P = .054). CONCLUSION: This pooled analysis demonstrated a reduced risk of CMV infection among sirolimus-treated patients as compared to those receiving alternative forms of immunosuppression in Wyeth-sponsored clinical trials in solid organ transplantation. This risk reduction persisted in subgroup analyses stratified by class of comparator treatment.     

Relationship of cytomegalovirus viral load in blood to pneumonitis in lung transplant recipients.

We developed a multiplex, quantitative, real-time, polymerase chain reaction assay for cytomegalovirus (CMV) and used it to measure the CMV viral load in weekly blood specimens from 43 lung transplant recipients. The median viral load in blood samples immediately preceding bronchoscopy was 1150 copies/microg human DNA for 12 subjects with pneumonitis compared to 91 copies for 31 subjects without (P=0.02, Mann-Whitney U test). Each log10 increase in CMV viral load resulted in an increase of 1.92 in the odds ratio for CMV pneumonitis (95% confidence interval 1.03-3.56). CMV viral load was elevated (>100 copies/microg human DNA) for a median of 21 days before bronchoscopy in those subjects with pneumonitis versus 0 days in those without (P=0.004). We conclude that the risk of CMV pneumonitis after lung transplantation is related to the level of CMV DNA in blood. Quantitative PCR should be evaluated prospectively for the preemptive management of CMV in lung transplant recipients.     

Preemptive treatment for cytomegalovirus viremia to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Preemptive treatment with antiviral agents of patients with CMV viremia has been widely adopted as an alternative to routine prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive treatment in preventing symptomatic CMV disease. METHODS: The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists were searched for randomized trials of preemptive treatment in solid organ transplant recipients. Two authors extracted all data; analysis was with a random effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Ten eligible trials (476 patients) were identified, six of preemptive treatment versus placebo or standard care (treatment of CMV when disease occurred), three of preemptive treatment versus antiviral prophylaxis and one of oral versus intravenous preemptive treatment. Compared with placebo or standard care, preemptive treatment significantly reduced the risk of CMV disease (6 trials, 288 patients, RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.80) but not acute rejection (3 trials, 185 patients, RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.76) or all-cause mortality (2 trials, 176 patients, RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.30). Comparative trials of preemptive therapy versus prophylaxis showed no significant difference in the risks of CMV disease (2 trials, 151 patients, RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.07 to 2.65), acute rejection (1 trial, 70 patients, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.42 to 2.09) or all-cause mortality (3 trials, 151 patients, RR 1.86, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.72). CONCLUSIONS: Few randomized trials have evaluated the effects of preemptive therapy to prevent CMV disease. Preemptive therapy is effective compared with placebo or standard care, but additional head-to-head trials are required to determine the relative benefits and harms of preemptive therapy and prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in solid organ transplant recipients.     

Prophylactic CMV therapy does not improve three‐yr patient and graft survival compared to preemptive therapy

Despite increasing evidence in favor of prophylactic valganciclovir treatment in kidney transplant recipients for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, the impact of preemptive vs. prophylactic treatment on long‐term clinical outcomes is unclear. In this retrospective study, 187 kidney transplant recipients with serologic intermediate‐risk constellation (recipient CMV IgG positive) received either preemptive or prophylactic treatment with valganciclovir. Patient survival (primary endpoint), graft survival, viremia rates, and other CMV‐related outcomes were analyzed. Prophylactic therapy reduced the rates for CMV viremia during the first year (hazard ratio: 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30–0.75; p < 0.001). There was a trend for higher three‐yr patient mortality in the prophylactic group (hazard ratio: 5.08, 95% CI 0.62–41.3; p = 0.091), and the rate of graft loss was not reduced (hazard ratio: 0.93, 95% CI 0.32–2.68; p = 0.894). Estimated glomerular filtration rate over three yr was on average 6.8 mL/min/1.73 m² lower in the prophylactic group (95% CI −11.68 to −1.81; p = 0.007) using a multivariate random effects model but showed more improvement over time. Prophylactic valganciclovir treatment reduced the rate of CMV infections during the first year post‐transplant but no effects of prophylactic treatment on patient and graft survival or kidney function over three yr were observed.     

Clinical utility of quantitative cytomegalovirus viral load determination for predicting cytomegalovirus disease in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: The early detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) after liver transplantation may form the basis of a preemptive strategy for prevention of active CMV disease. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed the clinical use of weekly quantitative polymerase chain reaction-(PCR) based plasma viral load determinations and the antigenemia assay for predicting the development of active CMV disease in 97 consecutive liver transplant recipients. RESULTS: CMV disease occurred in 21/97 patients. Using a positive cut-off of >400 copies/ml plasma, PCR had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity 47.4%, positive predictive value 34.4% and negative predictive value 100% for prediction of CMV disease. Respective values for a positive antigenemia (>0 positive cells/slide) were 95.2, 55.3, 37.0, and 97.7%. Different cut-off points for a positive test were analyzed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The optimal cut-off for viral load was in the range of 2000-5000 copies/ml (sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 86.8%, PPV 64.3%, NPV 95.7% for >5000 copies/ml). The optimal cut-off for antigenemia was in the range of four to six positive cells/slide. Mean peak viral load in symptomatic patients was 73,715 copies per/ml versus 3615 copies/ml in patients with asymptomatic CMV reactivation (P<0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for CMV disease (CMV serostatus, acute rejection, and induction immunosuppression), peak viral load and peak antigenemia emerged as the only significant independent predictors of CMV disease (for PCR, odds ratio=1.40/1000 copy/ml increase in viral load, P=0.0001; for antigenemia odds ratio=1.17/1 positive cell/slide). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma viral load by quantitative PCR is useful for predicting CMV disease and could be used in a preemptive strategy.     

Easier Control of Late‐Onset Cytomegalovirus Disease Following Universal Prophylaxis Through an Early Antiviral Immune Response in Donor‐Positive,Recipient‐Negative Kidney Transplants

Universal prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention is viable but, compared with a preemptive strategy, leads to higher incidence of late‐onset disease (LOD) associated with poor patient and graft survival. The purpose of this study was to compare LOD with early onset disease (EOD), with a focus on the highest risk kidney transplant recipients (KTRs): CMV seronegative recipients transplanted from seropositive donors (D+R?). Since CMV control depends on both antiviral treatment and specific immune response, we also compared Vδ2‐negative (Vδ2^neg) γδ T cell expansion involved in CMV infection resolution. EOD was defined as occurring <3 mo and LOD as occurring >3 mo after transplantation. Depending on the period, universal prophylaxis or preemptive treatment was used. Overall, 168 D+R? KTRs were included between 2003 and 2011. LOD was associated with a lower peak DNAemia (p = 0.04), fewer recurrences (odds ratio 0.16; 95% confidence interval 0.05–0.55; p = 0.01) and shorter anti‐CMV curative treatment (40 vs. 60 days, p < 0.0001). As a corollary, we found that Vδ2^neg γδ T cell expansion was faster in LOD than in EOD (31 vs. 168 days after the beginning of CMV disease, p < 0.0001). In D+R? KTRs, universal prophylaxis is associated with more LOD, which had better infection management and a faster immune response. These results support the use of universal prophylaxis over a preemptive strategy and reappraise outcomes of LOD.     

Incidence and Risk Factors for Cytomegalovirus Disease in a Colombian Cohort of Kidney Transplant Recipients

Incidence and risk factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in a Colombian cohort of kidney transplant recipients. CMV infection and disease are important causes of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients, and its prevalence varies with economic, geographic, and ethnic factors. Among 1620 records from a Colombian reference center, CMV immunoglobulin (Ig)G seroprevalence was found to be 90.9% among recipients and 90.2% among donors. In 86% (n = 264) of the cases, CMV disease occurred during the first 6 months after the transplantation, and the most frequent clinical presentation was CMV syndrome, followed by gastrointestinal disease. The following parameters were independent predictors of CMV disease: serological status of D+/R+ (hazard ratio [HR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03–2.63) and D+/R− (HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.49–4.93), age of the recipient (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.03), and receiving more than 30 mg of prednisolone by the end of the first month after transplantation (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.22–2.07). Acyclovir prophylaxis or other antiviral agents significantly decreased the risk of disease (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.29–0.58 and HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.20–0.58, respectively). In conclusion, we found a high prevalence of CMV infection in a cohort of Latin American transplant recipients. In accord with findings from other regions, serological status is the main risk factor, prophylaxis with acyclovir is effective, and induction with alemtuzumab does not increase the risk of CMV disease.     

Real-time PCR assay compared with antigenemia assay for detecting cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant recipients

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among kidney transplant recipients. The CMVpp65 antigenemia assay has been used for preemptive therapy. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology for CMV DNA quantification in blood has demonstrated a good correlation with the currently employed CMV antigenemia assay. In this study, 90 renal transplant recipients were prospectively enrolled from July 2004 and May 2005. Monitoring of CMV infection was routinely performed with CMV antigenemia and real-time PCR assays. Real-time plasma PCR and CMV antigenemia assays were assessed on 797 samples. CMV antigenemia correlated with a positive CMV PCR (chi(2) = 78.05; P < .0001). Not only the positive rate but also the number of positive cells correlated with the number of PCR DNA copies (F = 26.07, r(2) = .25, P < .0001). To define an optimal cutoff value of CMV DNA load to initiate treatment in kidney transplant patients, we considered a CMV antigenemia titer of >50 positive cells per 400,000 leukocytes as the gold standard in our previous study. The optimal cutoff value for the quantitative real-time PCR assay was predicted to be 86 copies/microL. Thus, we observed that CMV real-time PCR assay would not completely replace antigenemia assay in kidney transplant recipients, but can be used complementarily to screen antigenemia and monitor preemptive therapy.     

Cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation: viral load as a guide to treating clinical infection

BACKGROUND: Quantitative commercial assays for early and accurate detection of active cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after liver transplantation are widely available. However, meaningful interpretation of viral load measurements is hampered by the lack of definitive cutoff points that correlate with clinically significant disease. METHODS: One hundred fifty liver allograft recipients were prospectively monitored for the presence of CMV DNA for the first 12 weeks after orthotopic liver transplantation using the Murex hybrid capture system. The first CMV DNA value after liver transplantation, a weekly rise in CMV DNA (gradient value), and the CMV DNA value on clinical detection of active infection (critical value) were analyzed as risk factors for CMV infection. RESULTS: Forty-four (29.3%) of 150 patients had detectable CMV DNA within 12 weeks of transplantation, and 20 (13.3%) experienced symptomatic CMV infection. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that baseline CMV DNA level above 10 pg/mL, positive weekly increase in CMV DNA level, and critical CMV DNA level above 13 pg/mL were independent risk factors for clinically significant infection. Using Cox's multiple regression model, the hazard ratio was 13.9 for baseline CMV DNA above 10 (P =0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 3.5-54) and 13 for a weekly increase in the gradient (P =0.0003; 95% confidence interval, 3.5-50). Critical CMV DNA level above 13 correlated with active infection (100% sensitivity, 98% specificity, 90% positive predictive value, 100% negative predictive value). CONCLUSION: Baseline and gradient CMV DNA viral load levels correlate with active CMV infection in liver allograft recipients. These data indicate that CMV viral load detection by hybridization methodology is useful in predicting active CMV infection and could be used in a preemptive strategy in liver allograft recipients.     

Cytomegalovirus PP65 antigenemia monitoring as a guide for preemptive therapy: a cost effective strategy for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in adult liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in adult liver transplant recipients, using routine preemptive therapy guided by the pp65 antigenemia test. METHODS: Antigenemia was monitored weekly after liver transplantation (OLTX) for the first 3 months, and once a month for another 3 months. CMV seronegative recipients were treated preemptively for the first positive antigenemia. Seropositive recipients were treated only when their antigenemia count reached a threshold of > or =100 positive cells per 200,000 leukocytes. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were included between June 1994 and April 1995, of which 137 (95%) were primary OLTX. The percentage of positive antigenemia and CMV disease was 55 and 8%, respectively. Seventy-eight (54%) patients were protocol-monitored for the entire follow-up (group 1) and received appropriate preemptive therapy, although 66 (46%) patients had protocol violation by having missed blood samples or blood drawn at unscheduled times (group 2). Using Cox's proportional hazards model, patients with a first antigenemia count of >11 leukocytes had a significantly higher rate of CMV disease compared to patients with an antigenemia count < or =11 leukocytes (RR = 7.3, 95% confidence interval = 2.2 to 24.5). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, adjustments were made to control for: group 1 versus group 2, use of OKT3, and serology risk categories. This analysis showed that the relative rate of CMV disease was still significantly higher among patients with antigenemia count >11 leukocytes (adjusted RR = 4.9, 95% confidence interval = 1.3 to 18.1). The estimated cost of preemptive therapy was less than that of prophylaxis with i.v. (14-day course) or oral (90-day course) ganciclovir. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive therapy guided by pp65 antigenemia is a useful and cost effective strategy for prevention of CMV disease.     

Impact of Antiviral Preventive Strategies on the Incidence and Outcomes of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

We assessed the impact of antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy on the incidence and outcomes of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in a nationwide prospective cohort of solid organ transplant recipients. Risk factors associated with CMV disease and graft failure‐free survival were analyzed using Cox regression models. One thousand two hundred thirty‐nine patients transplanted from May 2008 until March 2011 were included; 466 (38%) patients received CMV prophylaxis and 522 (42%) patients were managed preemptively. Overall incidence of CMV disease was 6.05% and was linked to CMV serostatus (D+/R? vs. R+, hazard ratio [HR] 5.36 [95% CI 3.14–9.14], p < 0.001). No difference in the incidence of CMV disease was observed in patients receiving antiviral prophylaxis as compared to the preemptive approach (HR 1.16 [95% CI 0.63–2.17], p = 0.63). CMV disease was not associated with a lower graft failure‐free survival (HR 1.27 [95% CI 0.64–2.53], p = 0.50). Nevertheless, patients followed by the preemptive approach had an inferior graft failure‐free survival after a median of 1.05 years of follow‐up (HR 1.63 [95% CI 1.01–2.64], p = 0.044). The incidence of CMV disease in this cohort was low and not influenced by the preventive strategy used. However, patients on CMV prophylaxis were more likely to be free from graft failure.

     

Cytomegalovirus prevention strategies in seropositive kidney transplant recipients: an insight into current clinical practice

There is notable heterogeneity in the implementation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention practices among CMV‐seropositive (R+) kidney transplant (KT) recipients. In this prospective observational study, we included 387 CMV R+ KT recipients from 25 Spanish centers. Prevention strategies (antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy) were applied according to institutional protocols at each site. The impact on the 12‐month incidence of CMV disease was assessed by Cox regression. Asymptomatic CMV infection, acute rejection, graft function, non‐CMV infection, graft loss, and all‐cause mortality were also analyzed (secondary outcomes). Models were adjusted for a propensity score (PS) analysis for receiving antiviral prophylaxis. Overall, 190 patients (49.1%) received preemptive therapy, 185 (47.8%) antiviral prophylaxis, and 12 (3.1%) no specific intervention. Twelve‐month cumulative incidences of CMV disease and asymptomatic infection were 3.6% and 39.3%, respectively. Patients on prophylaxis had lower incidence of CMV disease [PS‐adjusted HR (aHR): 0.10; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01–0.79] and asymptomatic infection (aHR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.29–0.72) than those managed preemptively, with no significant differences according to the duration of prophylaxis. All cases of CMV disease in the prophylaxis group occurred after prophylaxis discontinuation. There were no differences in any of the secondary outcomes. In conclusion, antiviral prophylaxis was associated with a lower occurrence of CMV disease in CMV R+ KT recipients, although such benefit should be balanced with the risk of late‐onset disease.     

Nebulized amphotericin B prophylaxis for Aspergillus infection in lung transplantation: study of risk factors

BACKGROUND: Aspergillus infection remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Therefore, some strategies have been attempted, one of which is nebulized amphotericin B (nAB); however, the efficacy of this prophylaxis has not been shown clearly. The aim is to study whether nAB can protect against Aspergillus infection in lung transplant recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A study of risk factors was conducted in 55 consecutive lung allograft recipients. Twenty-three potential risk factors were analyzed. In 44 (80%) patients, nAB was indicated as prophylaxis. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: Eighteen of the 55 patients (33%) developed infection due to Aspergillus spp. Multivariate analysis showed nAB to be a preventive factor (odds ratio: 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.69; p < 0.05) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease was an independent risk factor for developing Aspergillus infection (odds ratio: 5.1; 95% CI 1.35-19.17; p < 0.05). Only 1 patient required withdrawal of the prophylaxis owing to bronchospasm. nAB was well-tolerated in the remaining patients with only a few, mild, easily controlled side effects. CONCLUSIONS: The present results show that nAB prophylaxis may be efficient and safe in preventing Aspergillus infection in lung-transplanted patients, and CMV disease increases the probability of Aspergillus infection.     

Abstension from treatment of low-level pp65 cytomegalovirus antigenemia after liver transplantation: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: Ganciclovir is a highly effective and relatively safe drug to treat cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in liver transplant patients; CMV resistance to ganciclovir is progressively emerging due to the extensive use of the drug in transplant and AIDS patients; CMV pp65 antigenemia allows early diagnosis of CMV infection and quantitation of the viral load; preemptive antigenemia-guided therapy of CMV infection can prevent CMV disease but the threshold of antigenemia value above which treatment has to be instituted is unclear. METHODS: To demonstrate the safety of abstention from preemptive treatment in the presence of low levels of antigenemia 77 consecutive liver transplant recipients were prospectively evaluated. Antigenemia was tested twice a week from transplantation until discharge, then once a week until the third postoperative month. In absence of risk factors for CMV disease, namely donor positive/recipient negative CMV serology, treatment with antibodies to lymphocytes and retransplantation, only patients with antigenemia of more than 50 or symptoms possibly related to CMV infection had preemptive treatment. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients had at least one positive antigenemia test with a value less than 50; 22 (68.7%) spontaneously cleared the virus, 3 were treated with i.v. ganciclovir for the presence of fever, and the other 7 (21,8%) progressed to values of antigenemia of more than 50 and were treated even if asymptomatic. No CMV disease was observed in these patients. CONCLUSION: CMV antigenemia less than 50 in liver transplant recipients with low and intermediate risk for CMV disease does not mandate preemptive ganciclovir treatment. Close surveillance with repeated determination of antigenemia until its negativization and careful clinical and laboratory monitoring is advisable.     

Increased Incidence of Colorectal Malignancies in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Case Control Study

This study was to evaluate the frequency of colorectal neoplasia in renal transplant recipients and to investigate the association with Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. We compared the frequency of colorectal neoplasia among renal transplant recipients with that of the healthy subjects. Specimens of colorectal neoplasia were examined for EBV and CMV using in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Of 796 renal transplantation cohorts, 315 were enrolled. The frequency of colorectal neoplasia among the patients was 22.9%. Compared with the healthy subjects, the odds ratio (OR) for advanced adenoma was 3.32 (95% CI, 1.81–6.10). The frequency of cancer among the patients was 1.9% (OR, 12.0; 95% CI, 1.45–99.7). A long interval between transplantation and colonoscopy was a significant factor in the development of advanced colorectal neoplasia. EBV positivity was detected in 30.6% of colorectal neoplasia specimens from renal transplant recipients, which was higher than that for the controls (p = 0.002). CMV was not detected in any lesions of patients or controls. In conclusion, renal transplant recipients have a significantly increased risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia. EBV was more frequently found in specimens of advanced colorectal neoplasm obtained from the renal transplant recipients.     

Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease Following Renal Transplantation: Preliminary Report of Incidence and Potential Risk Factors

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease are major causes of morbidity and mortality after renal transplantation. However, the incidence and potential risk factors are different in developing countries. We sought to determine the incidence and potential risk factors for CMV infection and disease in our center. We also sought to identify groups of recipients who may benefit from preemptive therapy.

Materials and methods

Forty renal transplant recipients were monitored regularly for CMV infection within 6 months after transplantation using CMV immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG titers, pp65 antigenemia, and CMV DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Thorough laboratory and physical examinations were performed to detect CMV disease. We evaluated the role of various factors in CMV infection and disease development using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier statistical models.

Results

CMV infection and disease were detected in 33 (82.5%) and 10 (25%) subjects, respectively. Average time to infection and disease development was 4.7 and 11 weeks, respectively. PCR was the most accurate method of diagnosis in 22 (67%) cases. By comparison to other recipients, patients who received antithymocyte globulin (ATG) showed a significant decrease in time to disease development (P = .009). Upon multivariate survival analysis, ATG therapy remained an independent risk factor for CMV disease (odds ratio: 6.8; P = .02).

Conclusion

Due to the low rate of progression from CMV infection to disease, it does not seem reasonable to perform preemptive therapy in all infected cases. ATG therapy was an independent risk factor for CMV disease. Recipients of this treatment would be proper candidates to receive preemptive therapy.