De Novo Everolimus-Based Therapy in Renal Transplant Recipients: Effect on Proteinuria and Renal Prognosis

Background

In large-scale clinical trials, the proliferation signal inhibitor (PSI) everolimus (EVL) combined with cyclosporine (CsA) and steroids, has been shown to be efficacious among de novo renal transplant recipients. Development of proteinuria has been shown to be an important predictor of renal dysfunction after conversion from CsA to a PSI-based regimen, and a key marker of allograft disease progression. Whether EVL de novo treatment is associated with a similar proteinuric effect is still under investigation.

Methods

We compared the development of proteinuria among a cohort of 24 renal transplant recipients who were prescribed EVL (3 mg/d; n = 12; high-dose group) or 1.5 mg/d (n = 12; standard-dose group), in association with CsA, versus third control cohort of 12 patients who received mycophenolate mofetil (control group). EVL doses were adjusted to achieve trough blood levels of 3-8 ng/mL and 8-12 ng/mL among the standard and high-dose groups, respectively. We assessed renal function and protein excretion over a 2-year observation.

Results

The high-dose group showed a trend toward greater proteinuria than the standard-dose on control groups. They showed significantly greater proteinuria from 9 months until 2 years; 0.86 ± 0.5, 0.5 ± 0.3, 0.47 ± 0.2 g/24 h (P = .03 and P = .02, respectively, at 24 months). Mean proteinuria significantly correlated with mean EVL doses (n = .73; P = .0001). Concomitantly, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly lower among patients treated with EVL 3.0 versus 1.5 mg/d (53.7 ± 24 vs 73.04 ± 17.6 mL/min; P = .037). Among patients in the standard-dose, the eGFR was consistently higher than the control group (62.6 ± 29 mL/min).

Conclusion

EVL/CsA therapy is a safe alternative regimen for de novo renal transplant recipients. Higher EVL doses are correlated with greater increases in proteinuria. The standard EVL dose seems to be useful treatment strategy to prevent acute rejection episodes, with a better renal prognosis in the long term.     

Long-Term Follow-Up of Renal Transplant Recipients Treated With IVIG for De Novo Donor-Specific Antibodies

BackgroundRenal allograft survival is negatively affected by the development of de novo posttransplant donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA). We sought to determine whether treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) could remove or reduce the intensity of dnDSA.MethodsA single-center study of 12 recipients with dnDSA and stable function who received IVIG 1 g/kg monthly for 6 months were compared with a contemporaneous cohort of 24 recipients with dnDSA who did not receive IVIG.ResultsThe median time to first dnDSA was 6 months (interquartile range [IQR], 1-12), and follow-up was 83 months (IQR, 58-94) posttransplant. Resolution of dnDSA occurred in 27% of IVIG vs 46% of control recipients (P = .48). Fifty-eight percent of recipients in both cohorts demonstrated a reduction in the intensity of the dominant DSA at last follow-up (P =1.0). A reduction in the number of dnDSAs occurred in 58% vs 62% of the IVIG and control cohorts, respectively (P = .81). Post-dnDSA, acute rejection occurred in 8% of the IVIG vs 42% in the control group (P = .06). Forty-two percent of IVIG-treated vs 49% of control recipients had a deterioration in function from first dnDSA until most recent follow-up (P = .81). Actuarial graft survivals were equivalent between groups.ConclusionsIVIG treatment of dnDSA in recipients with stable graft function had no impact on DSA clearance or MFI reduction, but this outcome may also be owing to sample size. Larger studies or alternate dosing regimens may be required to determine if there is any role for the use of IVIG as a treatment for dnDSA.     

Transitional Cell Carcinoma in Renal Transplant Recipients

Renal transplantation (RTx) recipients have a high incidence of cancer, including transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). Posttransplantation urologic malignancies still present a challenge for transplant surgeons. Using the Dialysis and Transplant Registry of Taichung Veterans General Hospital, a total of 55 cancers were diagnosed in 52 RTx recipients between May 1983 and September 2001. Of these, 24 RTx recipients developing TCC were identified and presented the distinctly high percentage (43.6%) of TCC that were malignancies after RTx in Taiwan. The mean time between transplantation and initial diagnosis was 46 months in our series. Painless hematuria with pyuria is the most common mode of presentation. Transitional cell carcinoma of RTx recipients had multiple foci. Moreover, synchronous TCC in bilateral upper urinary tracts were confirmed in 9 (41%) recipients. The pathologic status of disease is invasive at diagnosis (pTa: 2, pT1: 7, pT2: 4, pT3: 6, pT4: 2, graft metastasis: 1 and distant metastasis: 2). Disseminated metastasis occurred in 6 recipients, all of whom died of their disease within 16 months. Five recipients received adjuvant chemotherapy and retained stable renal function. We conclude that RTx recipients have a markedly increased incidence of TCC in Taiwan, and that prophylactic bilateral nephroureterectomy of native kidneys with bladder cuff excision can be performed simultaneously in RTx recipients with TCC.     

Everolimus With Reduced Tacrolimus Improves Renal Function in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

In a prospective, multicenter, open‐label study, de novo liver transplant patients were randomized at day 30±5 to (i) everolimus initiation with tacrolimus elimination (TAC Elimination) (ii) everolimus initiation with reduced‐exposure tacrolimus (EVR+Reduced TAC) or (iii) standard‐exposure tacrolimus (TAC Control). Randomization to TAC Elimination was terminated prematurely due to a higher rate of treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection (tBPAR). EVR+Reduced TAC was noninferior to TAC Control for the primary efficacy endpoint (tBPAR, graft loss or death at 12 months posttransplantation): 6.7% versus 9.7% (?3.0%; 95% CI ?8.7, 2.6%; p<0.001 for noninferiority [12% margin]). tBPAR occurred in 2.9% of EVR+Reduced TAC patients versus 7.0% of TAC Controls (p = 0.035). The change in adjusted estimated GFR from randomization to month 12 was superior with EVR+Reduced TAC versus TAC Control (difference 8.50 mL/min/1.73 m², 97.5% CI 3.74, 13.27 mL/min/1.73 m², p<0.001 for superiority). Drug discontinuation for adverse events occurred in 25.7% of EVR+Reduced TAC and 14.1% of TAC Controls (relative risk 1.82, 95% CI 1.25, 2.66). Relative risk of serious infections between the EVR+Reduced TAC group versus TAC Controls was 1.76 (95% CI 1.03, 3.00). Everolimus facilitates early tacrolimus minimization with comparable efficacy and superior renal function, compared to a standard tacrolimus exposure regimen 12 months after liver transplantation.     

Extensive Surveillance Promotes Early Diagnosis and Improved Survival of De Novo Malignancies in Liver Transplant Recipients

The aim of our study was to examine whether an extensive surveillance protocol will promote early diagnosis and improved survival in patients with de novo cancer following liver transplantation (LT). Of 779 consecutive LT recipients, 96 (12.3%) developed 105 malignancies. The cumulative risk for the development of de novo cancer was 10%, 24%, 32% and 42% at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years after LT, respectively. The most frequent tumor types were skin (17%), lung (16%), oropharyngeal (11%) and prostate cancer (11%). The overall standard incidence ratio as compared to that of the general population was 1.9 (95% CI: 1.5–2.3). The median survival of patients with de novo non-skin cancers was 3.1 years after diagnosis. Only patients with skin cancers and solid tumors, diagnosed at early stages, showed an excellent outcome. After introducing an intensified surveillance protocol, the detection rate of de novo cancers increased from 4.9% to 13% and more de novo malignancies were diagnosed in earlier stages. For non-skin cancers, the median tumor-related survival significantly improved from 1.2 to 3.3 years as well as the median overall survival post-LT. This study indicates that an extensive tumor surveillance program is highly recommendable in LT recipients.     

De Novo Membranous Nephropathy Associated With Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BackgroundMembranous nephropathy (MN) is a rare autoimmune disease that can develop a persistent nephrotic syndrome and end-stage kidney disease, with a recurrence rate of 30% to 40% after kidney transplant.MethodsRetrospective case series of membranous nephropathy observed in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients with donor-specific anti–human leukocyte antigen antibodies and biopsy-proven antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).ResultsWe report 4 cases of membranous nephropathy associated with AMR. MN was diagnosed 10 to 92 months posttransplant, associated with de novo donor-specific antibodies, specific to class I in 2 cases, and class II in another 2. All cases presented typical morphology of membranous nephropathy, with subepithelial deposits with spikes at electron microscopy. Immunostaining for immunoglobulin G4 was negative in all cases, and podocyte-expressed M-type phospholipase A2 receptor was detected in glomerular basement membrane of 3 cases. Biopsy specimens from patients with longer follow-up showed more intense microvascular inflammation and chronic injury markers, possibly because of subclinical immunologic injury. AMR therapy included immunoglobulin 2g/kg in 3 patients, isolated or associated with plasmapheresis. One patient was not treated because of an active disseminated infection. Two patients remain with functioning grafts and under antiproteinuric therapy. Two grafts were lost, 1 because of chronic failure and the other because of death secondary to infection. Despite treatment, donor-specific antibodies remain detectable in a 6-month follow-up.ConclusionsDe novo MN is a rare manifestation associated with AMR in kidney transplant recipients. The occurrence of podocyte-expressed M-type phospholipase A2 receptor in de novo MN suggests antibody-mediated activation, despite the use of maintenance immunosuppression.     

Generic Formulation of Mycophenolate Mofetil (Myfenax) in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: Results of 12-Month Observation

Background

The aim of this study was to show the preliminary outcomes of transplantation in patients treated with the generic formulation of mycophenolate mofetil (Myfenax, Teva).

Materials and Methods

Over the past 4 years, 60 patients received generic mycophenolate mofetil (Myfenax) after renal transplantation at the Gdansk Transplantology Center. During the same time period, another 273 kidney transplantations were performed in our department, and these patients were treated with other formulations of mycophenolate (CellCept [Roche], Myfortic, or mycophenolate mofetil–Apotex) as a part of the immunosuppressive plan. Thirty of the Myfenax patients received a pair of kidneys from the same donor and received original mycophenolate mofetil CellCept with observation for at least 12 months.

Results

The outcomes of the renal transplantations in both groups (Myfenax vs pair) were good, with satisfactory function of grafts. One case of graft loss was reported in the Myfenax group (renal vein thrombosis, graftectomy 5 days after transplantation). There was no difference in the incidence of acute renal graft rejection in either group. Moderate adverse reactions to immunosuppression were observed in both groups. On the other hand, a comparison between the 60 patients with Myfenax and the 273 other patients with other formulations of mycophenolate revealed no differences in the incidence of acute renal graft rejection, delayed graft function, graft loss, and death.

Conclusions

There were no differences in the incidence of acute renal graft rejection, delayed graft function, graft loss, and death in patients with Myfenax vs original CellCept and other formulations of mycophenolate. To confirm its complete biological and pharmacokinetic equivalence with the reference medicine, long-term, randomized observations carried out on larger renal transplant patients groups are needed.     

Once Daily Everolimus Is Safe and Effective in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: Six-Month Results of a Pilot Study

Introduction

The half-life of everolimus is approximately 28 hours, but everolimus is normally administered twice a day. The aim of this prospective, single-center, exploratory study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a once a day (OD) everolimus regimen versus the standard twice a day regimen (BID) for immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation.

Methods

Forty de novo renal transplant recipients prospectively assigned to OD (n = 21) or BID (n = 19) were followed for 6 months. In the OD group, everolimus was given orally once a day to target a trough blood level of 2-6 ng/mL. In the BID, group everolimus was given twice a day to target a trough blood level of 3-12 ng/mL. All patients also received induction treatment with basiliximab and low-dose calcineurin inhibitors.

Results

At 6 months follow-up, patient and graft survivals were 100%; renal function and acute rejection rates were similar between the 2 regimens. Patients in the OD group showed significantly lower cholesterol and triglyceride levels compared with those in the BID group, namely, total cholesterol level, OD 212 ± 54 versus BID 249 ± 59 mg/dL (P < .05), and serum triglycerides, OD 162 ± 72 versus BID 245 ± 133 mg/dL (P < .02).

Discussion

This study showed that OD administration of everolimus provided excellent patient and graft survivals and good renal function without an increased incidence of acute rejection episodes. The lipid profile was significantly better among patients receiving everolimus OD. These findings suggested that everolimus can be safely administered once a day.     

MeltDose Technology vs Once-Daily Prolonged Release Tacrolimus in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients

BackgroundAn extended-release formulation of tacrolimus designed for once-daily administration (LCP-TAC) is a new prolonged-release tacrolimus (TAC-PR) formulation using a drug delivery technology designed to enhance the bioavailability of drugs compared with TAC-PR. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare de novo administration of LCP-TAC and TAC-PR for therapeutic trough levels and daily dosage during the first 30 days after first liver transplant (LT).MethodsA total of 35 patients submitted to first LT between 2016 and 2018 were retrospectively enrolled: 16 received LCP-TAC, while 19 received TAC-PR as de novo immunosuppression. Patients were analyzed for daily dosage and trough levels at postoperative days (PODs) 3, 7, 15, and 30.ResultsThe initial dose of tacrolimus did not differ between LCP-TAC and TAC-PR (mean, 5.19 [SD, 1.72] mg/d vs mean, 5.26 [SD, 1.91] mg/d, P = .90). On PODs 7, 15, and 30 the daily dosage was statistically lower for LCP-TAC compared with TAC-PR (mean, 5.44 [SD, 2.06] mg/d vs mean, 7.68 [SD, 2.91] mg/d, P = .01; mean, 5.33 [SD, 2.23] mg/d vs mean, 8.82 [SD, 2.35] mg/d, P < .001; and mean, 5.38 [SD, 2.50] mg/d vs mean, 9.81 [SD, 3.78] mg/d, P < .001, respectively). The therapeutic trough levels were significantly higher for LCP-TAC on POD 3 (mean, 5.05 [SD, 3.58] ng/mL vs mean, 2.42 [SD, 2.75] ng/mL, P = .03) and POD 5 (mean, 7.35 [SD, 5.12] ng/mL vs mean, 4.17 [SD, 2.05] ng/mL, P = .04), while no differences were found on PODs 7, 15, and 30.The percentage of patients on POD 3 achieving a trough level higher than 6 ng/mL was higher for LCP-TAC than TAC-PR (40% vs 13%, P = .05).ConclusionsLCP-TAC after LT is safe and might enhance bioavailability, reducing the amount of drug necessary to achieve therapeutic trough levels compared with TAC-PR.     

Superior Efficacy of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate vs Mycophenolate Mofetil in De Novo Transplant Recipients: Pooled Analysis

Dose reduction and discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy because of gastrointestinal complications has been associated with increased risk of acute rejection episodes and graft loss. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) delays release of mycophenolic acid (MPA), and was designed to reduce MPA-related gastrointestinal adverse events. Data comparing the efficacy of EC-MPS vs MMF in de novo renal transplant (RTx) recipients from large prospective studies are limited. Therefore, a pooled data analysis was performed based on 1891 de novo RTx recipients receiving EC-MPS (n = 1289) or MMF (n = 602) plus cyclosporine and steroid therapy in 4 prospective multicenter studies with similar entry criteria. In all trials, the initial dose of EC-MPS was 1440 mg/d, and of MMF was 2000 mg/d; both dosages deliver equimolar amounts of MPA. Induction therapy was permitted in 2 studies per center practice. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, adjusting other potential explanatory variables including recipient age, sex, and race/ethnicity; induction therapy; and diabetes mellitus at baseline. In addition, propensity scores were used to explain potential bias. Mean (SD) MPA dose (EC-MPS dosage was converted to MMF equivalent) during months 0 to 12 was similar: EC-MPS, 1820 (370) mg/d, vs MMF, 1860 (290) mg/d. However, at univariate and multivariate analyses, the rates of treatment failure, biopsy-proved acute rejection episodes, and graft loss were significantly lower with EC-MPS compared with MMF at month 12. In conclusion, this pooled analysis documents a substantial improvement in efficacy in de novo RTx recipients receiving EC-MPS vs MMF with concomitant cyclosporine and steroid therapy.     

Osteonecrosis in Renal Transplant Recipients: Early Radiological Detection and Course

Early radiologic signs and the radiologic course were examined retrospectively in 20 renal transplant patients who developed osteonecrosis after transplantation. Osteonecrosis appeared in 25 hips, 8 knees, 9 shoulders and 1 elbow. In most patients who developed osteonecrosis of the hip the early radiologic signs of osteonecrosis, with areas of lucencies and increased densities, were preceded by a thin fracture line in the immediate subchondral bone, parallel to the articular surface, appearing within a mean of 14 months after renal transplantation. This change seems to be a specific and very early finding in patients who subsequently develop osteonecrosis after renal transplantation. The initiation of collapsing phenomena of the articular surface was preceded by architectural changes near the articular surface with areas of lucencies and sclerosis. At the time of this investigation 26 per cent of the bones showed signs of regression of the changes with rebuilding of the former shape; 32 per cent showed progression and in 42 per cent the condition was stationary.     

Prostate Cancer in Renal Transplant Recipients: Diagnosis and Treatment

Background

We currently know that prostate cancer (Pca) risk is reduced in patients undergoing kidney transplantation. However, its impact and treatment are not widely studied.

Comparison of De Novo Cancer Incidence in Australian Liver,Heart and Lung Transplant Recipients

Population‐based evidence on the relative risk of de novo cancer in liver and cardiothoracic transplant recipients is limited. A cohort study was conducted in Australia using population‐based liver (n = 1926) and cardiothoracic (n = 2718) registries (1984–2006). Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were computed by cancer type, transplanted organ and recipient age. Cox regression models were used to compare cancer incidence by transplanted organ. During a median 5‐year follow‐up, the risk of any cancer in liver and cardiothoracic recipients was significantly elevated compared to the general population (n = 499; SIR = 2.62, 95%CI 2.40–2.86). An excess risk was observed for 16 cancer types, predominantly cancers with a viral etiology. The pattern of risk by cancer type was broadly similar for heart, lung and liver recipients, except for Merkel cell carcinoma (cardiothoracic only). Seventeen cancers (10 non‐Hodgkin lymphomas), were observed in 415 pediatric recipients (SIR = 23.8, 95%CI 13.8–38.0). The adjusted hazard ratio for any cancer in all recipients was higher in heart compared to liver (1.29, 95%CI 1.03–1.63) and lung compared to liver (1.65, 95%CI 1.26–2.16). Understanding the factors responsible for the higher cancer incidence in cardiothoracic compared to liver recipients has the potential to lead to targeted cancer prevention strategies in this high‐risk population.     

Wound Healing Complications with De Novo Sirolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil-Based Regimen in Cardiac Transplant Recipients

Sirolimus was introduced in de novo immunosuppression at Stanford University in view of its favorable effects on reduced rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. After an apparent increase in the incidence of post-surgical wound complications as well as symptomatic pleural and pericardial effusions, we reverted to a mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based regimen. This retrospective study compared the outcome in heart transplant recipients on sirolimus (48 patients) with those on MMF (46 patients) in de novo immunosuppressive regimen. The incidence of any post-surgical wound complication (52% vs. 28%, p = 0.019) and deep surgical wound complication (35% vs. 13%, p = 0.012) was significantly higher in patients on sirolimus than on MMF. More patients on sirolimus also had symptomatic pleural (p = 0.035) and large pericardial effusions (p = 0.033) requiring intervention. Logistic regression analysis showed sirolimus (p = 0.027) and longer cardiac bypass time (OR = 1.011; p = 0.048) as risk factors for any wound complication. Sirolimus in de novo immunosuppression after cardiac transplantation was associated with a significant increase in the incidence of post-surgical wound healing complications as well as symptomatic pleural and pericardial effusions.     

Renal Function in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving Different Prolonged‐Release Tacrolimus Regimens—The DIAMOND Study

DIAMOND: multicenter, 24‐week, randomized trial investigating the effect of different once‐daily, prolonged‐release tacrolimus dosing regimens on renal function after de novo liver transplantation. Arm 1: prolonged‐release tacrolimus (initial dose 0.2mg/kg/day); Arm 2: prolonged‐release tacrolimus (0.15–0.175mg/kg/day) plus basiliximab; Arm 3: prolonged‐release tacrolimus (0.2mg/kg/day delayed until Day 5) plus basiliximab. All patients received MMF plus a bolus of corticosteroid (no maintenance steroids). Primary endpoint: eGFR (MDRD4) at Week 24. Secondary endpoints: composite efficacy failure, BCAR and AEs. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Tacrolimus trough levels were readily achieved posttransplant; initially lower in Arm 2 versus 1 with delayed initiation in Arm 3. eGFR (MDRD4) was higher in Arms 2 and 3 versus 1 (p = 0.001, p = 0.047). Kaplan–Meier estimates of composite efficacy failure‐free survival were 72.0%, 77.6%, 73.9% in Arms 1–3. BCAR incidence was significantly lower in Arm 2 versus 1 and 3 (p = 0.016, p = 0.039). AEs were comparable. Prolonged‐release tacrolimus (0.15–0.175mg/kg/day) immediately posttransplant plus basiliximab and MMF (without maintenance corticosteroids) was associated with lower tacrolimus exposure, and significantly reduced renal function impairment and BCAR incidence versus prolonged‐release tacrolimus (0.2mg/kg/day) administered immediately posttransplant. Delayed higher‐dose prolonged‐release tacrolimus initiation significantly reduced renal function impairment compared with immediate posttransplant administration, but BCAR incidence was comparable.     

Early Assessment of Renal Resistance Index and Long-Term Renal Function in Renal Transplant Recipients

Background. The effect of the intrarenal arterial resistance index (RI) on long-term renal functions is not well known. We examined the predictive value of intrarenal RI on long-term allograft outcomes. Methods. We retrospectively investigated 121 stable renal transplant recipients, followed for a mean of 63.21?±?19.9 months after renal transplant. Patients with complications during the first six months after transplant were not included. Color Doppler ultrasonography was done to calculate the intrarenal RI within the first four weeks after transplant. Results. Older recipient age, high pulse pressure, active smoking, and proteinuria were associated with a higher intrarenal RI. Multivariate analyses revealed that renal RI and donor age were independent predictors of allograft outcome. Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative graft survival were significantly worse in patients who had an RI of 0.7 or more than they were in patients who had an RI of less than 0.7 (p?=?.005). Development of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) was significantly higher in patients who had an RI of 0.7 or more (p?=?.02). Conclusions. Renal RI determined within the first month after renal transplant predicts long-term allograft function and development of CAN in renal transplant recipients.     

Protein Kinase C Inhibitor Sotrastaurin in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Phase II Trial

Efficacy and safety of protein kinase C inhibitor sotrastaurin (STN) with tacrolimus (TAC) was assessed in a 24‐month, multicenter, phase II study in de novo liver transplant recipients. A total of 204 patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to STN 200 mg b.i.d. + standard‐exposure TAC (n = 50) or reduced‐exposure TAC (n = 52), STN 300 mg b.i.d. + reduced‐exposure TAC (n = 50), or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 1 g b.i.d. + standard‐exposure TAC (control, n = 52); all with steroids. Owing to premature study termination, treatment comparisons were only conducted for Month 6. At Month 6, composite efficacy failure rates (treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection episodes of Banff grade ≥1, graft loss, or death) were 25.0%, 16.5%, 20.9% and 15.9% for STN 200 mg + standard TAC, STN 200 mg + reduced TAC, STN 300 mg + reduced TAC and control groups, respectively. Median estimated glomerular filtration rates were 84.0, 83.3, 81.1 and 75.3 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively. Gastrointestinal events (constipation, diarrhea, and nausea), infection, and tachycardia were more frequent in STN groups. More patients in STN groups experienced serious adverse events compared with the control group (62.3–70.8% vs. 51.9%). STN‐based regimens were associated with a higher efficacy failure rate and higher incidence of adverse events with no significant difference in renal function between the groups.