An Overview of the Efficacy and Tolerability of New Antiepileptic Drugs

Summary: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of recently developed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), a systematic review of placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the AEDs as add-on therapy in refractory partial epilepsy was conducted. Two or more RCTs meeting our inclusion criteria were found for gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM), vigabatrin (VGB), and zonisamide (ZNS). The outcome selected for estimation of efficacy was the proportion of patients experiencing a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline. Tolerability was estimated on the basis of rates of patient withdrawal from study for any reason. Efficacy and tolerability odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for each measure were generated for each trial included in the analysis, and overall efficacy and tolerability ORs were calculated for each AED across all trials and drug dosages evaluated. Because 95% CIs for both efficacy and tolerability overlapped for the six drugs, conclusive evidence of between-drug differences in effectiveness or safety were not obtained from the analysis. However, the data suggest that the drug with the highest OR for efficacy (TPM) may be approximately twice as effective as the AED with the lowest OR for efficacy (GBP), and that the treatment that appears to most frequently cause withdrawal (ZNS) may be about four times more likely to do so that the AED with the lowest withdrawal rate (LTG). RCTs comparing newer AEDs with the older standard drugs and with each other are needed to further evaluate their relative utility.     

Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Established and New Antiepileptic Drugs*

Summary: Antiepileptic drug (AED) selection is based primarily on efficacy for specific seizure types and epileptic syndromes. However, efficacy is often similar for the different AEDs, and other properties such as adverse effects, pharmacokinetic properties, and cost may also be of importance. For idiopathic generalized epilepsies with absence, tonic-clonic, and myoclonic seizures, the AED of choice is valproate (VPA). Secondarily generalized epilepsies with tonic, atonic, and other seizure types are difficult to treat with any single AED or combination of AEds. The AEDs of choice for absence seizures are ethosuximide (ESM) and VPA. For control of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures, any of the other major AEDs can be effective. If VPA cannot be prescribed, carbamazepine (CBZ), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), or primidone (PRM) may be effective, but ESM or a benzodiazepine (BZD) must be added to control associated absence or myoclonic seizures. The AEDs of first choice for partial epilepsies with partial and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures are CBZ and PHT. Increasing evidence suggests that VPA is a good alternative when CBZ and PHT fail. PB and PRM are second-choice selections because of adverse effects. A combination of two of the five standard AEDs may be necessary to treat intractable seizures, but no studies have been done to indicate an optimal combination. Other epilepsy syndromes such as neonatal and infantile epilepsies, febrile epilepsy, alcoholic epilepsy, and status epilepticus require specific AED treatment. Ultimately, AED selection must be individualized. No “drug of choice” can be named for all patients. The expected efficacy for the seizure type, the importance of the expected adverse effects, the pharmacokinetics, and the cost of the AEDs all must be weighed and discussed with the patient before a choice is made. A number of new AEDs with unique mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic properties, and fewer adverse effects hold important promise of improved epilepsy treatment.     

Pharmacokinetics of New Antiepileptic Drugs

Summary: This article surveys the pharmacokinetic parameters for the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs): felba-mate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, and vigabatrin. Compared to the pharmaco kinetics of standard AEDs, these new AEDs have progressed in terms of (a) longer half-lives, permitting once-or twice-daily dosing, (b) greatly reduced potential for drug interactions, thus increasing ease of treatment, and (c) general lack of hepatic enzyme induction, which facilitates polytherapy as well as other aspects of treatment.     

New Antiepileptic Drugs Already Registered

Summary: Vigabatrin, lamotrigine, and oxcarbazepine are three of the many new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) already registered in several countries that highlight some of the typical problems and prejudices of new AEDs. Both the therapeutic action and the side-effect profiles of new AEDs are only basically known with marketing. For all three of these new AEDs, antiepileptic effects have been demonstrated beyond doubt, but they still must withstand the test of clinical usefulness in substantial patient numbers. All three have some effect on focal seizures, but their clinical spectrum probably will turn out to be by no means uniform. These three AEDs are, in general, well tolerated, but it would be premature to compare their safety with traditional AEDs as one must be prepared for rare or delayed untoward effects that may be discovered later, as occurred with some older AEDs.     

Monotherapy Trials of New Antiepileptic Drugs

Summary: A number of clinical trials that test the efficacy and safety of the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have recently been concluded. Two dose-response trials in inpatients with refractory partial seizures and outpatients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy established the efficacy of gabapentin as monotherapy. Lamotrigine was found to have efficacy similar to that of phenytoin and carbamazepine (CBZ) and to be better tolerated than CBZ in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. It was also shown to have efficacy as monotherapy in partial seizures, based on the results of an active controlled trial, and in the treatment of absence seizures, based on the results of a responder-enriched study. Topiramate as monotherapy was found to be efficacious for treatment of partial-onset seizures, based on the results of a single-center dose-response trial. A dose-response trial that tested the efficacy of tiagabine monotherapy in patients with refractory partial epilepsy was uninformative. Oxcarbazepine was found to be safe and efficacious in four comparative trials in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy as well as in one placebo-controlled inpatient trial in patients with refractory partial seizures.     

Clinical Administration of New Antiepileptic Drugs: An Overview of Safety and Efficacy

Summary: Gabapentin, lamotrigine, tiagabine, topira-mate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide are all administered as add-on therapy for treatment of patients with refractory epilepsy. To date, no comparative randomized trials have been performed that could potentially allow an evidence-based choice to be made between these antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). We report a series of meta-analyses of placebo-controlled, randomized add-on trials in patients with partial epilepsy. Results of these meta-analyses are compared, thus giving broad estimates of the comparative efficacy and tolerability of these AEDs. The efficacy out come is the odds ratio for the number of patients with a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency. Reported side ef fects are also used as tolerability outcomes, and study withdrawal is used as a global outcome measure. Results are summarized as odds ratios with 95% confidence in tervals (CIs). When each outcome is compared among drugs, the 95% CIS overlap. Therefore, no conclusive ev idence of a difference in efficacy or tolerability between these AEDs was derived, even though the apparently most effective agent (topiramate) may be twice as effec tive as the apparently least effective agent (lamotrigine). Comparative randomized studies are needed to further evaluate these drugs.     

The New Antiepileptic Drugs: A Systematic Review of Their Efficacy and Tolerability

: Purpose: Gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM), vigabatrin (VGB), and zonisamide (ZNS) are all in use as “add-on” treatment for patients with refractory epilepsy. There have been no comparative randomized controlled trials allowing an evidence-based choice between these drugs. We report a series of meta-analyses of randomized placebo-controlled add-on trials in which these drugs have been tested in patients with partial epilepsy. This work provides an estimate of each drug's efficacy and tolerability compared with placebo. These estimates are compared across drugs to give broad estimates of comparative efficacy and tolerability. Methods: Trial reports were found by searching Medline, by searching through journals by hand, and by contacting the pharmaceutical industry. The outcomes chosen were the proportion of patients who (a) have a 350% reduction in seizure frequency (50% responders); (b) withdrew from the study (any reason); or (c) reported the following side effects: ataxia, dizziness, fatigue, nausea, or somnolence. Overall odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIS; 50% responders) or 99% CIS; side effects) were calculated. Results: Twenty-nine trials were included, representing 4,091 randomized patients. The ORs for 50% response (95% CI) were GBP, 2.29 (1.53–3.43); LTG, 2.32 (1.47–3.68); TGB, 3.03 (2.01–4.58); TPM, 4.07 (2.87–5.78); VGB, 3.67 (2.44–5.51); and ZNS, 2.7 (1.36–4.47). ORs for discontinuation were GBP, 1.36 (0.75–2.49); LTG, 1.19 (0.79–1.79); TGB, 1.81 (1.21–2.70); TPM, 2.56 (1.64–4.00); VGB, 2.58 (126–5.27); and ZNS, 4.23 (1.71–10.49). Conclusions: We have clear evidence that each of these drugs is better than placebo at preventing seizures. When results are compared across drugs, the confidence intervals overlap, and we have no conclusive evidence of differences in efficacy or tolerability. Despite this, the agent that appears most effective may be twice as effective as the agent that appears least effective, and the agent that appears most likely to cause discontinuation may be 4 times more likely to do so than the treatment that appears least likely to do so. Comparative randomized studies are needed further to evaluate these drugs.     

Mechanisms of Action of New Antiepileptic Drugs

Summary: Our understanding of how new antiepileptic drugs work mirrors what we know about how currently marketed antiepileptic compounds exert their action–that information is scarce and elusive. The mechanism of action of antiepileptic drugs is nevertheless inextricably linked to epileptogenesis itself, and investigations of several promising new compounds are underway to establish the levels at which these drugs act. Compounds act on synapses and membranes as well as affecting receptors, neurotransmitters, and peptides. The most extensive data are available on drugs that inhibit the action of GABA or its receptors, including new benzodiazepine-like agents and barbituric-acid derivatives. The few drugs that act by inhibiting the effects of excitatory amino acids are reviewed. Finally, the maximal electroshock test is an empirical method to determine the antiepileptic properties of a drug; several agents under development have been effective in this screening technique.     

Utilization of New Antiepileptic Drugs in Children

Summary: Studies of the newer antiepileptic drugs suggest that they are exciting additions with improved efficacy and a perhaps decreased toxicity in certain types of refractory childhood epilepsy. In some very rare syndromes only anecdotal reports exist and further study is needed. Issues of tolerability, long-term safety in very young children, and effects on learning, behavior and other cognitive functions must be balanced with the possibility of improved efficacy. Additional well-controlled studies taking into account both seizure types and epilepsy syndromes are very much needed in neonates, infants, school aged children and adolescents.     

新型抗癫(痫)药物研究进展

癫(痫)是一种常见的中枢神经系统综合征,严重影响患者生活质量.癫(痫)的治疗目前仍以药物为主,约30％患者为难治性癫(痫).随着对癫(痫)发生发展机制研究深入,以及传统药物升级,许多新型抗癫(痫)药物或具有抗癫(痫)作用的药物不断面市.文中将按照不同的作用机制对新上市的抗癫(痫)药物以及新发现的有抗癫(痫)作用的药物靶点进行介绍.     

The Clinical Pharmacokinetics of the New Antiepileptic Drugs

Summary: Because pharmacokinetics is a major determinant of the magnitude and duration of pharmacologic response, understanding the kinetic properties of the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is essential for the correct use of these compounds in clinical practice. After oral administration, absorption is rapid and relatively efficient for the new AEDs, the most notable exception being gabapentin, whose bioavailability decreases with increasing dosage. None of the new AEDs is extensively bound to plasma proteins except for tiagabine, which is over 95% protein-bound. The route of elimination differs to an important extent from one compound to another, and elimination half-lives range from over 30 h for zonisamide to 5–7 h for gabapentin. For all drugs that are metabolized, half-life is shortened and clearance is increased when patients receive concomitant enzyme-inducing agents such as barbiturates, phenytoin, and carbamazepine. Lamotrigine metabolism is markedly inhibited by valproic acid, and felbamate may increase the serum levels of most other AEDs. Felbamate, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine may also reduce the efficacy of the contraceptive pill by stimulating its metabolism.     

Clinical Efficacy of New Antiepileptic Drugs in Refractory Partial Epilepsy: Experience in the United States With Three Novel Drugs

Summary: A number of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), including topiramate (TPM), felbamate (FBM), and gabapentin (GBP), are approved or believed to be close to approval for marketing in the United States. Key efficacy findings for these AEDs in refractory partial epilepsy were reviewed. Large and significant drug-placebo differences were observed with TPM in two large dose-finding trials conducted in the United States. The minimal effective dose of TPM in the population studied was determined to be approximately 200 mg/day, and doses above 600 mg/day produced good efficacy but little incremental benefit versus the lower dosages for the overall study population. FBM is active in partial epilepsy, although seizure reduction is less marked and drug interactions complicate the findings. GBP is also active in this population, but only the 1,800 mg/day dosage was significantly better than placebo with respect to percent re-sponders. It may be useful to explore higher dosage ranges for both FBM and GBP if they can be well tolerated.