Lack of benefit with omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in HIV patients: A randomized pilot study

Objective: To assess the effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA) supplementation on bone metabolism in HIV-infected patients presenting with hypertriglyceridemia.

Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 2?g of n-3 PUFA or fenofibrate (FF). The primary endpoint was % change in bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline to month 24 in lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN). Secondary endpoints were changes in Z-score, calcitriol, calcitonin, parathyroid hormone, osteocalcin, and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) at 12 and 24?months. Differences in continuous variables were evaluated using the t test or Mann-Whitney U-test for independent samples and differences in means of intra- and inter-subject continuous variables using a general linear model. Categorical variables were compared by the chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test.

Results: 30 patients were included in each arm; 23 in the n-3 PUFA arm and 22 in the FF arm completed follow-up. No significant differences between arms were observed after 24?months in either region (FN: ?12.51% ± 7.89 in the n-3 PUFA arm and -8.18% ± 7.72 in the FF arm, p?=?.07; LS: 2.94% ± 6.63 in the n-3 PUFA arm, ?3.07% ± 16.85 in the FF arm, p?=?.07), although the BMD reduction in the FN region after 24?months was noticeable in both arms (n-3 PUFA: ?12.51% ± 7.89%, p?=<?.001; FF: ?8.183% ± 7.72%, p?=<?.001). There was a significant difference in calcitriol changes between arms after 96?weeks. No differences in Z-score or bone turnover markers were observed between the two arms.

Conclusions: Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation resulted in no beneficial changes in BMD or bone turnover markers. n-3 PUFA supplementation achieved similar reductions in triglyceride levels as FF.     

Lipoprotein(a) particle concentration and lipoprotein(a) cholesterol assays yield discordant classification of patients into four physiologically discrete groups

There is little known about the relative predictive value of different lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] assays in clinical use, although each has been shown to predict similar incremental risk over conventional clinical and lipid risk factors. Thus, we examined the classification behavior of two commonly used Lp(a) assays and their associations with other lipid parameters. Serum lipid and Lp(a) concentrations were measured in 144 primary and secondary prevention patients. Lp(a) cholesterol [Lp(a)-C] was measured with the Vertical Auto Profile (upper limit of normal, 10 mg/dL). Lp(a) particle concentrations [Lp(a)-P] were measured with an isoform-independent molar assay (upper limit of normal, 70 nmol/L). The subjects were divided into the following four groups on the basis of their Lp(a)-C and Lp(a)-P levels: normal Lp(a)-P and Lp(a)-C; high Lp(a)-P and normal Lp(a)-C; normal Lp(a)-P and high Lp(a)-C; and high Lp(a)-P and Lp(a)-C. The proportion of subjects with values above the upper limit of normal was similar with both assays (P = .15). However, the Lp(a)-C and Lp(a)-P assays discordantly classified 23% of the study's subjects. In addition, the four Lp(a)-defined groups displayed differences in their relationships with other lipoproteins. The two groups with elevated Lp(a)-C showed significant associations with higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein AI, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol/apolipoprotein AI ratios. Triglycerides were also noted to be above normal in discordant and normal within concordant Lp(a) groups. Finally, the amount of cholesterol per Lp(a) particle [Lp(a)-C/Lp(a)-P] varied widely across the four groups. These findings suggest that the four Lp(a)-defined groups are physiologically discrete. Further investigation is warranted to assess which parameters among Lp(a)-P, Lp(a)-C, and Lp(a)-C/Lp(a)-P can be used to more accurately characterize Lp(a)-associated cardiovascular risk.     

Relationship between lipoprotein(a) levels, oxidative stress, and blood pressure levels in patients with essential hypertension

High plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are considered a risk factor for the development of coronary artery disease. In vitro experiments have shown that oxidized Lp(a) is able to impair the arterial endothelium-dependent dilation, thus suggesting a possible role of Lp(a) in the genesis of essential hypertension. The aim of our work was to investigate the correlation of blood pressure levels with plasma Lp(a) concentration, apo(a) isoform size, and peroxidative stress in patients with essential hypertension. The study was performed in 54 untreated hypertensive patients whose blood pressure was monitored for 24 h by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Lp(a) concentration was measured by a double monoclonal antibody-based enzyme immunoassay demonstrated to be insensitive to apo(a) size heterogeneity. Apo(a) isoforms were determined by a high-resolution SDS-agarose gel electrophoresis followed by immunoblotting. A significant correlation was found between Lp(a) levels and the night-time systolic and diastolic pressures (r=0.32, P<0.05, and r=0.30, P<0.05, respectively), as well as with the mean night-time fall in systolic and diastolic blood pressures (r=0.28, P<0.05 and r=0.29, P<0.05, respectively). These relationships were further potentiated when peroxidative stress data were taken into consideration (r=0.37 and r=0.40, P<0.01 for the night-time systolic and diastolic pressures, respectively and r=0.34 and r=0.38, P<0.01 for the night-time fall in systolic and distolic blood pressures, respectively). Apo(a) isoform size did not affect these relationships. Our data suggest that Lp(a) and peroxidative stress may be involved as cofactors in essential hypertension, with a mechanism that remains to be elucidated. Received: 16 July 2001 / Accepted: 15 September 2001     

Human dendritic cell activities are modulated by the omega-3 fatty acid, docosahexaenoic acid, mainly through PPAR(gamma):RXR heterodimers: comparison with other polyunsaturated fatty acids

There is accumulating evidence that omega-3 fatty acids may modulate immune responses. When monocytes were differentiated to dendritic cells (DCs) in the presence of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), the expression of costimulatory and antigen presentation markers was altered in a concentration-dependent way, positively or negatively, depending on the markers tested and the maturation stage of the DCs. Changes induced by eicosapentaenoic acid and linoleic acid were similar but less intense than those of DHA, whereas oleic acid had almost no effect. DHA-treated, mature DCs showed inhibition of IL-6 expression and IL-10 and IL-12 secretion, and their lymphoproliferative stimulation capacity was impaired. The phenotypic alterations of DCs induced by DHA were similar to those already reported for Rosiglitazone (Rosi), a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma) activator, and the retinoid 9-cis-retinoic acid (9cRA), a retinoid X receptor (RXR) activator. Moreover, DHA induced the expression of PPAR gamma target genes pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase-4 and aP-2 in immature DCs. The combination of DHA with Rosi or 9cRA produced additive effects. Furthermore, when DCs were cultured in the presence of a specific PPAR gamma inhibitor, all of the changes induced by DHA were blocked. Together, these results strongly suggest that the PPAR gamma:RXR heterodimer is the pathway component activated by DHA to induce its immunomodulatory effect on DCs.     

Effect of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on resolvin (RvE1)-mediated suppression of inflammation in a mouse model of asthma

Objective: ResolvinE1 (RvE1), an endogenous lipid mediator derived from omega 3 fatty acids contributes to resolution of allergic inflammatory responses. We investigated effects of RvE1 (R) and omega 3 fatty acids (O) on airway reactivity and inflammation using allergic mice.

Methods: Mice were divided into control (nonasthmatic; CON) and allergen sensitized-challenged (asthmatic; SEN) groups, and were sensitized i.p. on days 1, 6 with 0.2?μg ovalbumin (OVA) followed by 5% OVA aerosol challenges on days 11–13. RvE1 was administered i.p. postallergen challenge, while omega 3 fatty acids (fish oil) were administered via oral gavage once daily (days 1–13). Whole body plethysmography and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) studies were performed on day 14.

Results: RvE1 attenuated airway responsiveness to methacholine (48?mg/ml) in treated asthmatic mice vs. nontreated (150?±?27.88% in SEN vs. 54?±?7.52% in SEN?+?R, p?<?.05). No difference was observed with omega-3 supplementation (115?±?19.28% in SEN?+?O) or treatment with both RvE1 and omega 3 fatty acids (39?±?12.37% in SEN?+?R?+?O vs. 54?±?7.52% in SEN?+?R). Differential BAL cell analysis showed that RvE1 decreased eosinophils and neutrophils in SEN mice (p?<?.005) while no difference was observed with omega-3 fatty acids. SEN?+?R?+?O group had similar results as RvE1 treated mice, suggesting that only RvE1 attenuated inflammation.

Conclusions: RvE1 attenuated airway responsiveness and inflammation in asthmatic mice. Omega-3 fatty acids, although a precursor for RvE1 formation, had no additive effects on RvE1 decreases in airway inflammation and airway reactivity. Our data suggests that omega-3 supplementation has little effect on airway inflammation and reactivity in our model of asthma.     

The effects of 90-day supplementation with the omega-3 essential fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) on cognitive function and visual acuity in a healthy aging population

The omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is essential for nervous system and retinal development and there is evidence to suggest that DHA deficiencies increase with normal aging. A triple-blind placebo-controlled randomized repeated-measures trial was conducted with 74 healthy participants, aged 45-77 years. Cognitive and visual acuity measures and plasma levels of DHA were determined at baseline and after 90 days of administration of either HiDHA(?) (Clover Corp., Sydney, NSW, Australia: 1000 mg of tuna oil; comprising 252 mg DHA, 60 mg EPA and 10 mg vitamin E) or placebo (1000 mg soybean oil). Ninety days of DHA supplementation was found to significantly raise both plasma DHA and total ω-3 plasma levels in the treatment group, as well as significantly lower total ω-6 levels. However, no significant effects of DHA supplementation on cognitive functioning were found. For participants with corrected vision, the group receiving DHA were found to have significantly better right eye visual acuity posttreatment in comparison with the placebo group (F(1,22) = 7.651; p = 0.011; partial η(2) = 0.258).     

Efficacy and safety of self-emulsifying formulation of highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester (MND-2119) versus highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester in patients with hypertriglyceridemia: Results from a 12-week randomized,double-blind,active-controlled,phase 3 study

BackgroundIn Japan, eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester (EPA-E) is administered twice-daily or three-times-daily for dyslipidemia. We have developed MND-2119, a novel self-emulsifying formulation of highly purified EPA-E, which can be administered once-daily.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to assess non-inferiority in the efficacy of MND-2119 in patients with hypertriglyceridemia compared with highly purified EPA-E.MethodsIn this multicenter, 12-week, double-blind study, patients with high triglyceride (TG levels between ≥ 150 and < 500 mg/dL) undergoing lifestyle modification were randomized to MND-2119 2 g/day (n=145), MND-2119 4 g/day (n=145), EPA-E 1.8 g/day (n=145) or EPA-E 2.7 g/day (n=145). The primary endpoint was percentage change in TG levels from baseline to end of treatment.ResultsMND-2119 2, 4 g/day and EPA-E 1.8, 2.7 g/day reduced TG levels from baseline by ?10.09%, ?15.51%, ?9.30%, and ?8.80%, respectively. The TG reduction rate of MND-2119 2 g/day was non-inferior to that of EPA-E 1.8 g/day (LS mean difference: -0.42, 95%CI: -5.76 to 4.91). Moreover, the TG reduction rate of MND-2119 4 g/day was superior to that of MND-2119 2 g/day (LS mean difference: -5.74, 95%CI: -10.59 to -0.89). There were no remarkable safety differences between MND-2119 2 g/day and EPA-E 1.8 g/day and between MND-2119 4 g/day and EPA-E 2.7 g/day.ConclusionNon-inferiority of MND-2119 2 g/day to EPA-E 1.8 g/day for efficacy, and superiority of MND-2119 4 g/day over MND-2119 2 g/day for efficacy were verified. MND-2119 was safe and well tolerated.     

Reduction in triglyceride level with N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in HIV-infected patients taking potent antiretroviral therapy: a randomized prospective study

To assess the evolution of triglyceride (TG) levels in HIV-infected patients receiving stable potent antiretroviral therapy treated with N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), a prospective double-blind randomized design for a reliable assessment of TG evolution was performed. One hundred twenty-two patients with TG levels >2 g/L and < or =10 g/L after a 4-week diet (baseline TG: 4.5 +/- 1.9 g/L) were randomized for 8 weeks to N-3 PUFAs (2 capsules containing 1 g of fish oil 3 times daily, n = 60), or placebo (1 g of paraffin oil capsules, n = 62). An 8-week open-label phase of N-3 PUFAs followed. Evaluation criteria were TG percent change at week 8, percentage of responders (normalization or > or =20% TG decrease), and safety issues. Ten patients with baseline TG levels >10 g/L were not randomized and received N-3 PUFAs as open treatment. The difference (PUFA - placebo) in TG percent change at week 8 was -24.6% (range: -40.9% to -8.4%; P = 0.0033), the median was -25.5% in the PUFA group versus 1% in the placebo group, and mean TG levels at week 8 were 3.4 +/- 1.8 g/L and 4.8 +/- 3.1 g/L, respectively. TG levels were normalized in 22.4% (PUFA) versus 6.5% (placebo) of patients (P = 0.013) with a > or =20% reduction in 58.6% (PUFA) versus 33.9% (placebo) of patients (P = 0.007). Under the open-label phase of N-3 PUFAs, the decrease in TG levels was sustained at week 16 for patients in the PUFA group (mean TG: 3.4 +/- 1.7 g/L), whereas a 21.2% decrease in TG levels occurred for patients in the placebo group (mean TG: 3.3 +/- 1.4 g/L). No significant differences were observed between groups in the occurrence of adverse events. The median TG change at week 8 was -43.6% (range: Q1-Q3; 95% CI: -66.5% to -4.6%) for patients with baseline TG levels >10 g/L. The difference in mean total cholesterol between groups (PUFA - placebo) at week 8 was -8.5% (P = 0.0117). This study demonstrated the efficacy of PUFAs to lower elevated TG levels in treated HIV-infected hypertriglyceridemic patients. N-3 PUFAs have a good safety profile.     

Relation of serum lipoprotein(a) concentration and apolipoprotein(a) phenotype to coronary heart disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

Familial hypercholesterolemia carries a marked increase in the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), but there is considerable variation between individuals in susceptibility to CHD. To investigate the possible role of lipoprotein(a) as a risk factor for CHD, we studied the association between serum lipoprotein(a) levels, genetic types of apolipoprotein(a) (which influence lipoprotein(a) levels), and CHD in 115 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. The median lipoprotein(a) level in the 54 patients with CHD was 57 mg per deciliter, which is significantly higher than the corresponding value of 18 mg per deciliter in the 61 patients without CHD. According to discriminant-function analysis, the lipoprotein(a) level was the best discriminator between the two groups (as compared with all other lipid and lipoprotein levels, age, sex, and smoking status). Phenotyping for apolipoprotein(a) was performed in 109 patients. The frequencies of the apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes and alleles differed significantly between the patients with and those without CHD. The allele LpS2, which is associated with high lipoprotein(a) levels, was found more frequently among the patients with CHD (0.33 vs. 0.12). In contrast, the LpS4 allele, which is associated with low lipoprotein(a) levels, was more frequent among those without CHD (0.27 vs. 0.15). We conclude that an elevated level of lipoprotein(a) is a strong risk factor for CHD in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, and the increase in risk is independent of age, sex, smoking status, and serum levels of total cholesterol, triglyceride, or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The higher level of lipoprotein(a) observed in the patients with CHD is the result of genetic influence.     

Elevated lipoprotein(a) levels in patients with acute myeloblastic leukaemia decrease after successful chemotherapeutic treatment

Summary Twenty-two patients with acute myeloblastic leukaemia (AML) were studied to investigate disease-associated changes in lipid metabolism. Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels were found to be elevated at the time of diagnosis (median 23 mg/dl; 41% of patient group had levels greater than 25 mg/dl) and diminished after successful chemotherapeutic treatment in 9 of 10 cases, with a maximum decrease from 56 to 10 mg/dl. In contrast, reduced levels of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) (medians 137, 87 and 20 mg/dl, respectively) were observed at the time of diagnosis. Cholesterol and HDL levels increased in all 10 and LDL in 9 cases in which complete remission was achieved. These data suggest that the catabolism of LDL-cholesterol might be even more enhanced than assumed to date. Furthermore, it indicates that the Lp(a) level in acute myeloblastic leukaemia is influenced either directly or indirectly by the leukaemic blasts.Abbreviations AML acute myeloblastic leukaemia - Lp(a) lipoprotein (a) - LDL low density lipoprotein - HDL high density lipoprotein - FAB French-American-British - CALGB cancer and leukaemia group B - CR complete remission - TG triglycerides - VLDL very low density lipoprotein - RIA radioimmunoassay - apo(a) apoprotein (a) - HMG-CoA reductase 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase Supported by the Volkswagen Stiftung with a grant to A.N.     

Serum lipoprotein (a) levels in chronic renal failure and liver cirrhosis patients. Relationship with atherosclerosis

This study was carried out to investigate the relationship between lipoprotein (a) levels and the development of atherosclerosis in chronic renal failure (CRF) patients with the possible role of the liver. Serum Lp (a) levels were measured in samples from 20 CRF patients on hemodialysis (HD), 20 liver cirrhosis (LC) patients, 20 patients having both CRF and LC and undergoing HD, and 20 normal control subjects. Renal function (blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine), hepatic function (transaminases (ALT and AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and total bilirubin) investigations and serum cholesterol were carried out for all the subjects enrolled in this study. Serum Lp (a) concentration in CRF patients without LC was 87.25 +/- 6.17 mg/dl, which was significantly higher than all the investigated groups (P < 0.001). Lp (a) concentration in patients with both CRF and LC was 24.65 +/- 1.98 mg/dl, which was not significantly different from the controls, but was significantly higher than that in the subjects with LC only (P < 0.001) where the latter group had significantly low Lp (a) values (11.1 +/- 0.99) relative to all the other groups (P < 0.001). Lp (a) correlated positively with cholesterol in all groups except the LC subjects, but did not correlate with age, or renal function in both CRF groups.