Effects of muscle damage induced by eccentric exercise on muscle fatigue

PURPOSE: The present study was designed to determine to what extent muscle damage induced by repetitive eccentric exercise with maximal voluntary effort (ECC) affects the time course of central and peripheral fatigue during sustained maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). METHODS: Ten healthy male volunteers were asked to perform brief (control MVC) and sustained MVC (fatigue test of 60 s in duration) with elbow flexion before and 2 and 4 d after ECC. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the motor cortex to determine changes in voluntary activation (VA), the size of the motor evoked potential (MEP), and length of electromyographic (EMG) silencing. The ratio of the root mean square value for the surface EMG of the biceps brachii and exerted force within 50 ms before TMS was also calculated (RMS/F). RESULTS: In two subjects, no significant changes in MVC and muscle soreness were seen after ECC so that their data was excluded from further analysis. Control MVC and muscle soreness was significantly decreased and increased, respectively, 2 and 4 d after ECC compared with that before ECC (P < 0.001). During the fatigue test, VA, which was determined by a phasic increase in the twitch force after TMS, significantly decreased 2 and 4 d after ECC compared with that beforehand (P < 0.01). In addition, the RMS/F was significantly increased 2 and 4 d after ECC (P < 0.001). Although the degree of facilitation of the MEP was significantly increased (P < 0.05), the length of EMG silencing was less affected by ECC. CONCLUSIONS: Muscle damage and/or muscle soreness induced by repetitive eccentric exercise with maximal effort may be a strong modifier of central and peripheral fatigue during sustained MVC.     

The effects of a repeated bout of eccentric exercise on indices of muscle damage and delayed onset muscle soreness

This study examined markers of muscle damage following a repeated bout of maximal isokinetic eccentric exercise performed prior to full recovery from a previous bout. Twenty non-resistance trained volunteers were randomly assigned to a control (CON, n=10) or experimental (EXP, n=10) group. Both groups performed 36 maximal isokinetic eccentric contractions of the elbow flexors of the non-dominant arm (ECC1). The EXP group repeated the same eccentric exercise bout two days later (ECC2). Total work and peak eccentric torque were recorded during each set of ECC1 and ECC2. Isometric torque, delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS), flexed elbow angle and plasma creatine kinase (CK) activity were measured prior to and immediately following ECC1 and ECC2. at 24h intervals for 7 days following ECC1 and finally on day 11. In both groups, all dependent variables changed significantly during the 2 days following ECC1. A further acute post-exercise impairment in isometric torque (30 +/- 5%) and flexed elbow angle (20 +/- 4%) was observed following ECC2 (p<0.05), despite EXP subjects producing uniformly lower work and peak eccentric torque values during ECC2 (p<0.05). No other significant differences between the CON and EXP groups were observed throughout the study (p>0.05). These findings suggest that when maximal isokinetic eccentric exercise is repeated two days after experiencing of contraction-induced muscle damage, the recovery time course is not significantly altered.     

The effects of muscle damage following eccentric exercise on gait biomechanics

To examine the effects of knee extensors muscle damage on walking and running biomechanics in healthy males. Muscle damage was caused by 60 (6x10) maximal eccentric knee flexions of both legs, selected in a random order, at an angular velocity of 1.05rad/s in 10 volunteers (mean age 20+/-1.0 years). Muscle damage indicators (creatine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS), eccentric and isometric (110 degrees knee flexion) peak torque), pelvic three dimensional (3D) orientation, as well as hip, knee and ankle-joint flexion/extension angles during gait (walking at 1.2m/s and running at 2.8m/s) were assessed pre- and 48h post-eccentric exercise. All muscle damage indicators revealed significant changes post- compared to pre-exercise data (P<0.05) confirming that muscle damage did occur. Kinematic analysis revealed that muscle damage significantly decreased the knee-joint angle range of movement at the stance and swing phases during walking (P<0.05) and running (P<0.05), respectively. These changes were accompanied by corresponding increases of pelvic rotation (P<0.05) and decrease of pelvic tilt (P<0.05). The present data demonstrate that damage of knee extensors result in changes of treadmill walking and running kinematics at both knee joint and pelvis. The fact that these alterations occur at different gait phases could be attributed to the speed of movement and to a self-protection mechanism to prevent further damage.     

Greater muscle damage induced by fast versus slow velocity eccentric exercise

Debate exists concerning the effect of contraction velocity on muscle damage, and few human studies have yet to address this issue. This study examined whether the velocity of eccentric exercise affected the magnitude of muscle damage. Twelve untrained subjects performed a series of slow velocity isokinetic eccentric elbow flexions (SV: 30 degrees . s (-1)) of one arm and a fast velocity exercise (FV: 210 degrees . s (-1)) of the other arm, separated by 14 days. In order to standardise the time under tension (120 s) for the two conditions, the number of muscle actions for SV was 30 and 210 for FV. Criterion measures consisted of maximal voluntary torque for isometric, concentric (4 velocities) and eccentric contractions (2 velocities), range of motion (ROM) and relaxed elbow joint angle (RANG), upper arm circumference, muscle soreness and plasma creatine kinase (CK) activity. Measures were taken before, immediately after, 0.5 hour and 24 - 168 hours (240 hours for CK) after each eccentric exercise protocol, and changes in the measures over time were compared between FV and SV by two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Both protocols resulted in significant decrements in isometric and dynamic torque (p < 0.01), but FV showed significantly (p < 0.05) greater reductions over time ( approximately 55 %) and a slower recovery compared to SV ( approximately 30 %). Significantly (p < 0.05) larger decreases in, and delayed recovery of, ROM and RANG were evident after FV compared to SV. FV had significantly (p < 0.05) larger increases in upper arm circumference and soreness compared to SV, and peak plasma CK activity was 4.5-fold greater (p < 0.05) following FV than SV. These results suggest that, for the same time under tension, fast velocity eccentric exercise causes greater muscle damage than slow velocity exercise in untrained subjects.     

Effects of prior concentric training on eccentric exercise induced muscle damage

BACKGROUND: Exercise induced muscle damage (EIMD) from strenuous unaccustomed eccentric exercise is well documented. So too is the observation that a prior bout of eccentric exercise reduces the severity of symptoms of EIMD. This has been attributed to an increase in sarcomeres in series. Recent studies have suggested that prior concentric training increases the susceptibility of muscle to EIMD following eccentric exercise. This has been attributed to a reduction of sarcomeres in series, which decreases muscle compliance and changes the length-tension relation of muscle contraction. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of prior concentric training on the severity of EIMD. METHODS: Four men and four women (mean (SD) age 21.1 (0.8) years) followed a four week concentric training programme. The elbow flexor musculature of the non-dominant arm was trained at 60% of one repetition maximum dynamic concentric strength performance, three times a week, increasing to 70% by week 3. After three days of rest, participants performed 50 maximal isokinetic eccentric contractions on both arms. All participants gave written informed consent before taking part in this study, which was approved by the school ethics committee. Strength, relaxed arm angle (RAA), arm circumference, and soreness on active extension and flexion were recorded immediately before eccentric exercise, one hour after, and at 24 hour intervals for three days. Data were analysed with fully repeated measures analyses of variance. RESULTS: Strength retention was significantly (p<0.01) greater in the control arm than the trained arm (84.0 (13.7)%, 90.4 (14.7)%, 95.2 (10.5)%, 103.5 (7.6)% v 75.5 (11.3)%, 77.6 (15.3)%, 80.1 (13.9)%, 80.9 (12.5)%) at one, 24, 48, and 72 hours respectively. Similarly, soreness was greater in the trained arm (0.7 (0.6), 3.1 (1.4), 3.0 (1.5), 1.9 (2.3)) than in the untrained arm (0 (0.2), 1.6 (1.3), 1.4 (0.6), 0.6 (0.4)) at one, 24, 48, and 72 hours respectively (p<0.05). Concentric training induced a significant reduction in RAA (165.2 (6.7) degrees v 157.3 (4.9) degrees ) before the eccentric exercise bout (p<0.01). This was further reduced and remained lower in the trained arm at all time points after the eccentric exercise (p<0.01). The arm circumference of the concentrically trained arm was significantly greater than baseline (p<0.05) at 72 hours (30.3 (2.9) v 29.8 (3.3) cm). CONCLUSIONS: These findings extend the understanding of the effects of prior concentric training in increasing the severity of EIMD to an upper limb exercise model. The inclusion of concentric conditioning in rehabilitation programmes tends to exacerbate the severity of EIMD in subsequent unaccustomed exercise. However, where concentric conditioning is indicated clinically, the net effect of conditioning outcome and EIMD may still confer enhanced strength performance and capability to dynamically stabilise a joint system.     

Comparison of changes in markers of muscle damage induced by eccentric exercise and ischemia/reperfusion

To examine the effects of eccentric exercise (EE) and ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) on the markers of muscle damage, 72 rats were randomly assigned to the EE group, I/R group and control group (C), respectively. The rats in EE ran downhill on a treadmill with a 16° inclination at a constant speed for 90 min, and the rats in the I/R group underwent 90 min of four‐limb ischemia, followed by 24, 48 and 72 h of reperfusion. Blood and tissue samples were collected immediately, 24, 48 and 72 h after exercise or reperfusion. Quantitative analyses showed that the I/R group had a significantly larger mitochondrial volume at 24 h after reperfusion compared with the C, and there were more disrupted Z‐lines in the EE group and more disrupted mitochondria in the I/R group at 24 h after exercise or reperfusion. When compared with the C, a significantly lower total antioxidant capacity and higher interleukin‐6 value were observed after exercise or reperfusion. Our data suggest that although EE and I/R result in some similar changes in the muscle damage markers, there are still some differences. The EE‐ and I/R‐induced muscle damage may be due to different mechanisms.     

Low-intensity elbow flexion eccentric contractions attenuate maximal eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage of the contralateral arm

Objectives

The magnitude of muscle damage induced by maximal eccentric contractions (MaxEC) of the elbow flexors (EF) is reduced when it is preceded by low-intensity (10% of maximal voluntary isometric contraction strength) eccentric contractions (10%EC) of the same muscle, or by MaxEC of the opposite EF. This study investigated whether 10%EC would reduce the magnitude of muscle damage after MaxEC performed by the opposite arm.

Effects of warm-up before eccentric exercise on indirect markers of muscle damage

PURPOSE: To test whether active and passive warm-up conducted before eccentric exercise attenuates clinical markers of muscle damage. METHODS: Untrained subjects were exposed to one of five conditions: low-heat passive warm-up (N = 10), high-heat passive warm-up (N = 4), or active warm-up (N = 9), preceding eccentric exercise; eccentric exercise without warm-up (N = 10); or high-heat passive warm-up without eccentric exercise (N = 10). Passive warm-up of the elbow flexors was achieved using pulsed short-wave diathermy, and active warm-up was achieved by concentric contraction. Creatine kinase (CK) activity, strength, range of motion, swelling, and muscle soreness were observed before treatment (baseline) and 24, 48, 72, and 168 h after treatment. RESULTS: High-heat passive warm-up without eccentric exercise did not affect any marker of muscle damage and was used as our control group. Markers of muscle damage were not different between groups that did or did not conduct warm-up before eccentric exercise. The active warm-up and eccentric groups exhibited a greater circumferential increase than controls (P < 0.0002), however, that was not observed after passive warm-up. Additionally, the active warm-up group exhibited a greater CK response than controls at 72 h (P < 0.05). The high-heat passive warm-up before eccentric exercise group exhibited significant change from controls at the least number of time points, but due to a small sample size (N = 4), these data should be viewed as preliminary. CONCLUSION: Our observations suggest that passive warm-up performed before eccentric exercise may be more beneficial than active warm-up or no warm-up in attenuating swelling but does not prevent, attenuate, or resolve more quickly the other clinical symptoms of eccentric muscle damage as produced in this study.     

Localization of muscle damage within the quadriceps femoris induced by different types of eccentric exercises

This study examined localization of muscle damage within the quadriceps femoris induced by different types of eccentric exercises by using transverse relaxation time (T ₂)‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI ). Thirty‐three young males performed either of the following three exercises: single‐joint eccentric contraction of the knee extensors (KE ), eccentric squat (S), or downhill walking (DW ) (n=11/exercise). KE and S consisted of 5‐set×10‐lowering of 90% one‐repetition maximum load. DW was performed for 60 minutes with −10% slope, 6 km/h velocity, and 20% body mass load carried. At pre‐ and 24‐, 48‐, and 72‐hours post‐exercise, T ₂‐MRI was scanned and T ₂ values for the rectus femoris (RF ), vastus intermedius (VI ), vastus lateralis (VL ), and vastus medialis (VM ) at proximal, middle, and distal sites were calculated. Additionally, soreness felt when static pressure was applied to these sites and maximal isometric knee extension torque were measured. Maximal torque significantly (P <.05) decreased (7%‐15%) at 24‐48 hours after all exercises. T ₂ significantly increased (3%‐9%) at 24‐72 hours after all exercises, with heterogeneities within the muscles found in each exercise. Effect size and peak change of T ₂, as well as soreness, overall indicated that the proximal RF after KE and middle VM after S and DW were most affected by these exercises. The VL did not show any significant T ₂ increase after all exercises. These results suggest that muscle damage specifically localizes at the proximal RF by KE and at the middle VM by S and DW , while the VL is least damaged regardless of the exercises.     

Muscle damage protective effect by two maximal isometric contractions on maximal eccentric exercise of the elbow flexors of the contralateral arm

Muscle damage after 30 maximal eccentric contractions of the elbow flexors (30MVEC ) is reduced when the same exercise is performed by the opposite arm, and when two maximal voluntary isometric contractions at a long muscle length (2MVIC ) are performed prior to 30MVEC by the same arm. This study investigated the hypothesis that 2MVIC would attenuate muscle damage after 30MVEC performed by the opposite arm. Untrained young (20‐25 years) men were placed into 1 of 4 experimental groups that performed 2MVIC at 1 (1d), 2 (2d), 4 (4d), or 7 days (7d) before 30MVEC by the opposite arm, or one control group that performed 30MVEC only (n = 13/group). Changes in indirect muscle damage markers after 30MVEC were compared among the groups by mixed‐design two‐way ANOVA . Maximal voluntary concentric contraction torque, range of motion, plasma creatine kinase activity, and muscle soreness did not change significantly after 2MVIC . Changes in these variables after 30MVEC were smaller (P  < .05) for 1d (eg, peak soreness: 45 ± 21 mm) and 2d groups (46 ± 20 mm) than control group (66 ± 18 mm), without significant differences between 1d and 2d groups. No significant differences in the changes were found among 4d, 7d, and control groups, except for soreness showing smaller (P  < .05) increases for 4d group (54 ± 19 mm) than 7d (62 ± 17 mm) and control groups. These results supported the hypothesis and showed that muscle damage induced by 30MVEC was reduced by 2MVIC performed 1‐2 days prior to 30MVIC by the contralateral arm.     

Concentric or eccentric training effect on eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare changes in muscle damage indicators following 24 maximal eccentric actions of the elbow flexors (Max-ECC) between the arms that had been previously trained either eccentrically or concentrically for 8 wk. METHODS: Fifteen subjects performed three sets of 10 repetitions of eccentric training (ECC-T) with one arm and concentric training (CON-T) with the other arm once a week for 8 wk using a dumbbell representing 50% of maximal isometric force of the elbow flexors (MIF) determined at the elbow joint of 90 degrees (1.57 rad). The dumbbell was lowered from a flexed (50 degrees, 0.87 rad) to an extended elbow position (180 degrees, 3.14 rad) in 3 s for ECC-T, and lifted from the extended to the flexed position in 3 s for CON-T. Max-ECC was performed 4 wk after CON-T and 6 wk after ECC-T. Changes in MIF, range of motion (ROM), upper arm circumference (CIR), muscle soreness (SOR), and plasma creatine kinase (CK) activity were compared between the ECC-T and CON-T arms. RESULTS: The first ECC-T session produced larger decreases in MIF and ROM, and larger increases in CIR and SOR compared with CON-T. CK increased significantly (P < 0.01) and peaked 4 d after the first training session, but did not increase in the following sessions. All measures changed significantly (P < 0.01) following Max-ECC; however, the changes were not significantly different between ECC-T and CON-T arms. CONCLUSION: These results showed that ECC-T did not mitigate the magnitude of muscle damage more than CON-T, and CON-T did not exacerbate muscle damage.     

The effects of magnesium supplementation on exercise performance

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of magnesium (Mg2+) supplementation on performance and recovery in physically active women using the sensitive and recently advanced measure of ionic Mg2+ (iMg). METHODS: Participants (N = 121) were screened for [iMg] in plasma, with 44 (36.4%) exhibiting [iMg] below the normal range of 0.53-0.67 mmol.L-1 (4). Thirty-two subjects (21 +/- 3 yr) representing a broad range of [iMg] (0.54 +/- 0.04 mmol.L-1) completed the main 14-wk study. At baseline, participants submitted to a resting blood pressure measurement, and they completed both an anaerobic treadmill test and an incremental (aerobic) treadmill test. For the latter, values for workload, oxygen uptake, and heart rate were obtained at both anaerobic threshold and maximal effort. Blood samples for iMg, total serum Mg2+ (TMg), erythrocyte Mg2+ (EMg), Ca2+, K+, Na+, hemoglobin, hematocrit, lactate, and glucose were also collected pretest, and 4, 10, 30 min, and 24 h posttest. Subjects received 212 mg.d-1 Mg oxide or placebo in a double-blind fashion and were retested after 4 wk. After a 6-wk washout period, the testing was repeated with a treatment crossover. RESULTS: Ionic Mg2+ increased with Mg2+ treatment versus placebo (P < 0.05); however, performance and recovery indices were not significantly affected. CONCLUSION: Four weeks of 212 mg.d-1 Mg oxide supplementation improves resting [iMg] levels but not performance or recovery in physically active women.     

Contralateral effects of eccentric resistance training on immobilized arm

This study compared the effects of contralateral eccentric‐only (ECC) and concentric‐/eccentric‐coupled resistance training (CON‐ECC) of the elbow flexors on immobilized arm. Thirty healthy participants (18‐34 y) were randomly allocated to immobilization only (CTRL; n = 10), immobilization and ECC (n = 10), or immobilization and CON‐ECC group (n = 10). The non‐dominant arms of all participants were immobilized (8 h·day^?1) for 4 weeks, during which ECC and CON‐ECC were performed by the dominant (non‐immobilized) arm 3 times a week (3‐6 sets of 10 repetitions per session) with an 80%‐120% and 60%‐90% of one concentric repetition maximum (1‐RM) load, respectively, matching the total training volume. Arm circumference, 1‐RM and maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) strength, biceps brachii surface electromyogram amplitude (sEMG_RMS), rate of force development (RFD), and joint position sense (JPS) were measured for both arms before and after immobilization. CTRL showed decreases (P < .05) in MVIC (?21.7%), sEMG_RMS (?35.2%), RFD (?26.0%), 1‐RM (?14.4%), JPS (?87.4%), and arm circumference (?5.1%) of the immobilized arm. These deficits were attenuated or eliminated by ECC and CON‐ECC, with greater effect sizes for ECC than CON‐ECC in MVIC (0.29: +12.1%, vs ?0.18: ?0.1%) and sEMG_RMS (0.31:17.5% vs ?0.15: ?5.9%). For the trained arm, ECC showed greater effect size for MVIC than CON‐ECC (0.47 vs 0.29), and increased arm circumference (+2.9%), sEMG_RMS (+77.9%), and RDF (+31.8%) greater (P < .05) than CON‐ECC (+0.6%, +15.1%, and + 15.8%, respectively). The eccentric‐only resistance training of the contralateral arm was more effective to counteract the negative immobilization effects than the concentric‐eccentric training.     

Acute effects of stretching on muscle stiffness after a bout of exhaustive eccentric exercise

With the aim to analyze the influence of stretching on muscle stiffness after eccentric exercise, 30 young men (18 - 32 years old), were divided into three groups: STR, undergoing a stretching program (SP) of the dominant quadriceps muscle, ECC, undergoing exhaustive eccentric exercise, and ECC/STR, undergoing eccentric exercise, followed by SP. Muscle stiffness (MS) was assessed immediately before the respective programs, and 1 and 24 hours after, measuring the following parameters during Wartenberg pendulum test: angle and angular velocity of first knee flexion (FKF) and following oscillating extension, time of oscillating movements and final resting knee angle (FRKA). Despite the slight (2%) but significant increase of FRKA, all further parameters did not change over time in STR. MS in ECC was documented by the reduced range of motion (ROM) and the slower angular velocity. Reduction in FRKA (10%) was still present after 24 hours, while other variables tended to recover eventually. Similar reduction in FKF was observed for ECC/STR, but with significantly less impairment in the range of pendulum movement one hour after the exercise and in tendency still remained less impaired 24 hours after. The results suggest that SP conducted after exhaustive eccentric exercise alleviated reductions in ROM induced by exercise.     

Changes in muscle architecture of biceps femoris induced by eccentric strength training with nordic hamstring exercise

Eccentric strength training alters muscle architecture, but it is also an important factor for the prevention of hamstring injuries. The purpose was to determine the architectural adaptations of the biceps femoris long head (BFlh) after eccentric strength training with nordic hamstring exercise (NHE), followed by a subsequent detraining period. The participants in this intervention (n=23) completed a period of 13 weeks consisting of a first week of control and prior training, followed by 8 weeks of eccentric strength training with NHE, and concluding with a 4‐week period of detraining. The architectural characteristics of the BFlh were measured at rest using two‐dimensional ultrasound before (M1—week 1) and after (M2—week 9) the eccentric strength training, and at the end of the detraining period (M3—week 13). The muscle fascicle length significantly increased (t =−7.73, d =2.28, P <.001) in M2 compared to M1, as well as the muscle thickness (t =−5.23, d =1.54, P <.001), while the pennation angle presented a significant decrease (t =7.81, d =2.3, P <.001). The muscle fascicle length decreased significantly (t =6.07, d =1.79, P <.001) in M3 compared to M2, while the pennation angle showed a significant increase (t =−4.63, d =1.36, P <.001). The results provide evidence that NHE may cause alterations in the architectural conditions of the BFlh and may have practical implications for injury prevention and rehabilitation programs.     

Partial protection against muscle damage by eccentric actions at short muscle lengths

PURPOSE: This study investigated the hypothesis that maximal eccentric actions at a short muscle length would fail to confer a protective effect against muscle damage induced by maximal eccentric exercise at a long muscle length. METHODS: Eleven males performed 24 maximal eccentric actions of the nondominant elbow flexors over a short extension range from an elbow joint angle of 0.87-1.74 rad (S-ECC) followed 4 wk later by eccentric actions at a long range of 2.27-3.14 rad (L-ECC). A second group of 11 males performed L-ECC on two occasions using the nondominant arm separated by 4 wk. Changes in maximal isometric strength, range of motion, upper arm circumference, muscle soreness, plasma creatine kinase and aspartate aminotransferase activities, and B-mode ultrasound images were compared between bouts and between groups by two-way repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: All measures changed significantly (P < 0.01) after the first bout; however, the effects were significantly (P < 0.01) smaller after S-ECC compared with L-ECC. The second bout resulted in significantly (P < 0.01) reduced changes in all measures compared with the first bout in the subjects who performed L-ECC on both occasions. The subjects who performed S-ECC in the first bout displayed significantly smaller changes after L-ECC than those seen after L-ECC alone, with the degree of attenuation being around 50-70%. CONCLUSION: Contrary to the hypothesis, S-ECC provided partial but effective protection against L-ECC. This result suggests adaptations associated with the repeated bout effect were also produced after S-ECC, but the degree of adaptations was not as strong as that by L-ECC. Eccentric exercise at a short extension range can be used as a strategy to present severe muscle damage.