A randomized phase II study of standard‐dose versus high‐dose rituximab with BEAM in autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed aggressive B‐cell non‐hodgkin lymphomas: long term results

High‐dose rituximab (HD‐R) combined with carmustine, cytarabine, etoposide and melphalan (BEAM) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was effective and tolerable in a single‐arm prospective study of relapsed aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (R‐NHL). We performed a randomized phase 2 study comparing HD‐R versus standard‐dose rituximab (SD‐R) in R‐NHL. Ninety‐three patients were randomized to HD‐R (1000 mg/m²) (n = 42) or SD‐R (375 mg/m²) (n = 51) administered on post‐transplant days +1 and +8, using a Bayesian adaptive algorithm. The 2 treatment arms were balanced in regards to patient demographic and clinical characteristics. At a median follow‐up of 7·92 years, the 5‐year disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 40% and 48%, respectively. We found no statistically significant differences between HD‐R and SD‐R in 5‐year DFS (36% vs. 43%; P = 0·205) and OS (43% vs. 52%; P = 0·392). In multivariate analyses, only disease status before ASCT [residual disease versus complete remission (CR)] (hazard ratio [HR] 1·79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1·08–2·95) and number of prior treatments received (>2 vs. ≤2 lines of treatment) (HR 1·89, 95% CI: 1·13–3·18) were associated with worse DFS and OS. Patients who had SCT while in CR or who received ≤2 lines of treatment prior to SCT had better 5‐year OS (57% vs. 35%; P = 0·02 and 54% vs. 30%, P = 0·001, respectively) in both arms. No differences in engraftments or adverse events were noted in the 2 arms. When combined with BEAM and ASCT in relapsed aggressive B‐cell NHL, HD‐R provided no DFS or OS advantage over SD‐R. In patients who have been exposed to rituximab in the frontline or salvage setting, the addition of rituximab in the peri‐transplant setting remains controversial.     

Long term follow-up of CEOP in the treatment of HIV related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)

Background: The development of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in AIDS conveys a poor prognosis with less than 10% of patients surviving beyond two years. These tumours are generally aggressive and often require systemic chemotherapy to bring about effective palliation. Aims: To report on the long term follow-up of patients with HIV related NHL treated with CEOP chemotherapy. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a group of 18 patients treated at two institutions between October 1990 and 1992 with modified CEOP chemotherapy. Doses were calculated using cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m², epirubicin 50 mg/m², vincristine 2 mg and prednisone 75–100 mg Xfive days, however initial doses of cyclophosphamide and epirubicin were modified to 50–75% of calculated dose. Results: Seventeen of the 18 patients were male, one female; age range 26–79 (median 36 years); seven with immunoblastic, three Burkitt's, one Ki-1 (anaplastic), six diffuse large cell, and one mixed large and small cell. Eight patients (44%) achieved a complete remission, with seven patients (39%) achieving a partial remission, for an overall response rate of 83% (95% CI=59–96%). Survival ranged from three-35 months (median nine months). Interestingly, four patients (22%) survived more than two years (median 31 months), three remaining in complete remission at the time of death. Generally therapy was well tolerated and toxicity was manageable. Conclusions: CEOP is an effective, tolerable and safe regimen and our long term follow-up suggests that there is a small sub-population of patients with HrV and lymphoma who may have a better prognosis and as such would clearly benefit from systemic chemotherapy as a means of prolonging survival and not simply palliation.     

Monotherapy with pixantrone in histologically confirmed relapsed or refractory aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma: post‐hoc analyses from a phase III trial

This post hoc analysis of a phase 3 trial explored the effect of pixantrone in patients (50 pixantrone, 47 comparator) with relapsed or refractory aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) confirmed by centralized histological review. Patients received 28‐d cycles of 85 mg/m² pixantrone dimaleate (equivalent to 50 mg/m² in the approved formulation) on days 1, 8 and 15, or comparator. The population was subdivided according to previous rituximab use and whether they received the study treatment as 3rd or 4th line. Median number of cycles was 4 (range, 2–6) with pixantrone and 3 (2–6) with comparator. In 3rd or 4th line, pixantrone was associated with higher complete response (CR) (23·1% vs. 5·1% comparator, P = 0·047) and overall response rate (ORR, 43·6% vs. 12·8%, P = 0·005). In 3rd or 4th line with previous rituximab (20 pixantrone, 18 comparator), pixantrone produced better ORR (45·0% vs. 11·1%, P = 0·033), CR (30·0% vs. 5·6%, P = 0·093) and progression‐free survival (median 5·4 vs. 2·8 months, hazard ratio 0·52, 95% confidence interval 0·26–1·04) than the comparator. Similar results were found in patients without previous rituximab. There were no unexpected safety issues. Pixantrone monotherapy is more effective than comparator in relapsed or refractory aggressive B‐cell NHL in the 3rd or 4th line setting, independently of previous rituximab.     

CD4+ Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are prognostic and independent of R‐IPI in patients with DLBCL receiving R‐CHOP chemo‐immunotherapy

Despite the Revised International Prognostic Index's (R‐IPI) undoubted utility in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL), significant clinical heterogeneity within R‐IPI categories persists. Emerging evidence indicates that circulating host immunity is a robust and R‐IPI independent prognosticator, most likely reflecting the immune status of the intratumoral microenvironment. We hypothesized that direct quantification of immunity within lymphomatous tissue would better permit stratification within R‐IPI categories. We analyzed 122 newly diagnosed consecutive DLBCL patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R‐CHOP) chemo‐immunotherapy. Median follow‐up was 4 years. As expected, the R‐IPI was a significant predictor of outcome with 5‐year overall survival (OS) 87% for very good, 87% for good, and 51% for poor‐risk R‐IPI scores (P < 0.001). Consistent with previous reports, systemic immunity also predicted outcome (86% OS for high lymphocyte to monocyte ratio [LMR], versus 63% with low LMR, P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed LMR as independently prognostic. Flow cytometry on fresh diagnostic lymphoma tissue, identified CD4⁺ T‐cell infiltration as the most significant predictor of outcome with ≥23% infiltration dividing the cohort into high and low risk groups with regard to event‐free survival (EFS, P = 0.007) and OS (P = 0.003). EFS and OS were independent of the R‐IPI and LMR. Importantly, within very good/good R‐IPI patients, CD4⁺ T‐cells still distinguished patients with different 5 year OS (high 96% versus low 63%, P = 0.02). These results illustrate the importance of circulating and local intratumoral immunity in DLBCL treated with R‐CHOP. Am. J. Hematol. 88:273–276, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Phase I trial of low dose decitabine targeting DNA hypermethylation in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and non‐Hodgkin lymphoma: dose‐limiting myelosuppression without evidence of DNA hypomethylation

Targeting aberrant DNA hypermethylation in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with decitabine may reverse epigenetic silencing in B‐cell malignancies. Twenty patients were enrolled in two phase I trials to determine the minimum effective pharmacological dose of decitabine in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL (n = 16) and NHL (n = 4). Patients received 1–3 cycles of decitabine. Dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed in 2 of 4 CLL and 2 of 2 NHL patients receiving decitabine at 15 mg/m² per d days 1–10, consisting of grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia and hyperbilirubinaemia. Six patients with CLL received decitabine at 10 mg/m² per d days 1–10 without DLT; however, re‐expression of methylated genes or changes in global DNA methylation were not observed. Therefore, a 5‐day decitabine schedule was examined. With 15 mg/m² per d decitabine days 1–5, DLT occurred in 2 of 6 CLL and 2 of 2 NHL patients, consisting of grade 3–4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia. Eight patients had stable disease. In 17 patients, there were no significant changes in genome‐wide methylation or in target gene re‐expression. In conclusion, dose‐limiting myelosuppression and infectious complications prevented dose escalation of decitabine to levels associated with changes in global methylation or gene re‐expression in CLL and NHL.     

Comparable outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) patients treated with reduced‐dose ibrutinib: results from a multi‐centre study

Richter Syndrome, an aggressive lymphoma occurring in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), has a generally poor prognosis and anthracycline‐based chemoimmunotherapy regimens designed to treat de novo diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma achieve modest clinical benefit. R‐EPOCH (rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin) has demonstrated greater activity against aggressive B‐cell histologies but has not been studied in Richter Syndrome. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 46 Richter Syndrome patients treated with first‐line R‐EPOCH at our institution between 1 January 2006 and 31 May 2014. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 3·5 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2·0–7·6] and median overall survival (OS) was 5·9 months (95% CI: 3·2–10·3). Toxicity was high and 30% of patients died without progression or response. Patients with a complex CLL karyotype had significantly shorter PFS and OS (P = 0·005 and P = 0·002, respectively). Multivariable analysis identified complex CLL karyotype as the most significant predictor of decreased survival [Hazard ratio (HR) 2·72, 95% CI: 1·14–6·52, P = 0·025], adjusting for number of prior CLL treatments (P = 0·036). Richter Syndrome patients with complex CLL karyotype experience poor survival with R‐EPOCH treatment and novel approaches are needed for these patients. In contrast, survival of patients without a complex CLL karyotype was similar to patients with de novo diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma.     

Prognostic value of complete remission status at end‐of‐treatment FDG‐PET in R‐CHOP‐treated diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: systematic review and meta‐analysis

This study systematically reviewed and meta‐analysed the prognostic value of complete remission status at end‐of‐treatment ¹⁸F‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐d ‐glucose positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET) in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R‐CHOP). The systematic PubMed/MEDLINE search yielded seven suitable studies comprising a total of 737 R‐CHOP‐treated DLBCL patients who were in complete remission at end‐of‐treatment FDG‐PET. Overall, the methodological quality of included studies was reasonable. The disease relapse rate among all patients with complete remission status according to end‐of‐treatment FDG‐PET ranged from 7·0% to 20·0%, with a weighted summary proportion of 13·7%. Five of seven studies reported progression‐free survival (PFS) of these patients at various specific time points, i.e., 2‐year PFS (n = 1), estimated 3‐year PFS (n = 3) and 5‐year PFS (n = 1), which was 83%, 85–86·4% and 75%, respectively. Three of seven studies reported overall survival (OS) of these patients at various specific time points, i.e., estimated 3‐year OS (n = 2) and estimated 5‐year OS (n = 1), which were 90%, 93·6% and 83%, respectively. In conclusion, a non‐negligible proportion of R‐CHOP‐treated DLBCL patients who achieve complete remission according to end‐of‐treatment FDG‐PET experiences disease relapse during follow‐up.     

Genetic polymorphisms in oxidative stress‐related genes are associated with outcomes following treatment for aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma

Variable survival outcomes are seen following treatment for aggressive non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). This study examined whether outcomes for aggressive B‐cell NHL are associated with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in oxidative stress‐related genes, which can alter drug metabolism and immune responses. Genotypes for 53 SNPs in 29 genes were determined for 337 patients given anthracycline‐based therapies. Their associations with progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Cox proportional hazard regression; associations with hematologic toxicity were estimated by logistic regression. To validate the findings, the top three SNPs were tested in an independent cohort of 572 DLBCL patients. The top SNPs associated with PFS in the discovery cohort were the rare homozygotes for MPO rs2243828 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14–3.06, P = 0.013), AKR1C3 rs10508293 (HR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.28–3.41, P = 0.0032) and NCF4 rs1883112 (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.43–1.02, P = 0.06). The association of the NCF4 SNP with PFS was replicated in the validation dataset (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.44–1.01, P = 0.05) and the meta‐analysis was significant (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.49–0.89, P < 0.01). The association of the MPO SNP was attenuated in the validation dataset, while the meta‐analysis remained significant (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.12–2.41). These two SNPs showed similar trends with OS in the meta‐analysis (for NCF4, HR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.51–1.02, P = 0.07 and for MPO, HR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.36–3.12, P < 0.01). In addition, patients with the rare homozygote of the NCF4 SNP had an increased risk of hematologic toxicity. We concluded that genetic variations in NCF4 may contribute to treatment outcomes for patients with aggressive NHL. Am. J. Hematol. 89:639–645, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Rituximab with high‐dose methotrexate in primary central nervous system lymphoma

The addition of rituximab (R) to chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with systemic B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphomas, but the impact in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) receiving high‐dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is unknown. Patients diagnosed with PCNSL at the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) between 2000 and 2013 were treated with ≥1 cycle of HDMTX 8 g/m² every 2 weeks, to best response or 10 cycles. After 2006, rituximab 375 mg/m² was given every 2 weeks with HDMTX for a total of 4 doses. 49 (66%) patients received HDMTX alone and 25 (34%) HDMTX+R, with a median of 5 (range 1–10) HDMTX cycles, and no difference between groups. The median follow‐up was 5 years: 8.8 years (range 3.15–13.5 years) HDMTX and 1.9 years (range 0.5–7 years) HDMTX+R. The 5‐year PFS was 17%, with no difference between groups (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.41–1.35; P = 0.33). The 5‐year OS was 38%, with no difference between the groups OS (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.35–1.52; P = 0.39). In this retrospective study comparing two subgroups of patients treated in different eras, the addition of R to HDMTX did not appear to improve outcomes in PCNSL, possibly consistent with its known poor CNS penetration. It is possible that with a larger sample size, longer follow‐up, or different rituximab dosing/schedule, the addition of rituximab may lead to a statistically significant improvement in outcomes. Prospective randomized trials currently in progress will more definitively estimate the impact of the addition of rituximab to HDMTX‐based chemotherapy for PCNSL. Am. J. Hematol. 90:1149–1154, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Favourable outcomes of poor prognosis diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patients treated with dose‐dense Rituximab,high‐dose Methotrexate and six cycles of CHOP‐14 compared to first‐line autologous transplantation

The optimal therapeutic approach for young diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with high‐intermediate and high‐risk age‐adjusted international prognostic index (aaIPI) remains unknown. Hereby we report a 10‐year single‐centre study of 63 consecutively treated patients. To optimize outcome, two approaches were carried out: Cohort 1 patients received four cycles R‐CHOP‐21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, daunorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone over 21 days) followed by first‐line high‐dose chemotherapy with autologous stem‐cell support (HDCT‐ASCT), resulting in 2‐year progression‐free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 60·6% and 67·9%. 39·4% of those patients were not transplanted upfront, mainly due to early progressive disease (24·2%). Cohort 2 patients received an early intensified protocol of six cycles of CHOP‐14 (cyclophosphamide, daunorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone over 14 days) with dose‐dense rituximab and high‐dose methotrexate resulting in promising overall response‐ (93·3%) and complete remission (90%) rates and sustained survival (2‐year PFS and OS: 93·3%). In an intention‐to‐treat analysis, 2‐year PFS (60·6% vs. 93·3%, hazard ratio [HR] 7·2, P = 0·009) and OS (69·7% vs. 93·3%, HR 4·95, P = 0·038) differed significantly, in favour of the early intensified protocol (Cohort 2). In a multivariate Cox‐regression model, PFS (HR 8·12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1·83–35·9, P = 0·006) and OS (HR 5·86, 95% CI 1·28–26·8, P = 0·02) remained superior for Cohort 2 when adjusted for aaIPI3 as the most important prognostic factor. Survival of young poor‐prognosis DLBCL patients appears superior after early therapy intensification.     

Long term follow‐up of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes using busulfan,cytosine arabinoside,and cyclophosphamide

We report here the 10‐year follow‐up of 86 patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). All patients received the busulfan, cytosine arabinoside, and cyclophosphamide (BAC) preparative regimen which consisted of busulfan 16 mg/kg, cytosine arabinoside 8 g/m² IV, and cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg IV. Fifty‐nine patients (69%) had de novo MDS; 26 (30%) had secondary MDS (treatment related), and one had a preceding aplastic anemia which progressed to MDS before transplant. Cytogenetics (80 patients) was classified as good (34%), intermediate (17%), or poor (42%). With a median follow‐up for survivors of 124 months, the 10‐year Kaplan‐Meier estimates for overall survival (OS) was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 31–53%). Cumulative nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and relapse was 43% (95% CI: 32–54%) and 19% (95% CI: 11–27%), respectively. No patient relapsed after 2 years. In patients with RAEB‐T/AML, 10‐year relapse‐free survival (RFS), relapse, and NRM was 36%, 36%, and 27%, respectively. Younger age (P = 0.05), human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match (P = 0.002), good risk cytogenetics (P = 0.008), and having a related donor (P = 0.03) significantly improved overall and RFS in the multivariable analysis. The long‐term follow‐up of patients receiving the BAC regimen with ASCT in this study indicated durable relapse‐free and OS with acceptable toxicity in this group of patients with high‐risk features. Am. J. Hematol., 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

A phase 2 study of lenalidomide,rituximab, cyclophosphamide,and dexamethasone (LR‐CD) for untreated low‐grade non‐Hodgkin lymphoma requiring therapy

Patients with indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) have multiple treatment options yet there is no consensus as to the best initial therapy. Lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory agent, has single agent activity in relapsed lymphoma. This trial was conducted to assess feasibility, efficacy, and safety of adding lenalidomide to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (LR‐CD) in untreated indolent NHL patients requiring therapy. This was a single institution phase II trial. Treatment consisted of IV rituximab 375 mg/m² day 1; oral lenalidomide 20 mg days 1–21; cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m² days 1, 8, and 15; and dexamethasone 40 mg days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28‐day cycle. Treatment continued 2 cycles beyond best response for a maximum of 12 cycles without rituximab maintenance. Thirty‐three patients were treated. Median age was 68 (43–83 years). 39% had stage IV disease. Histologic subtypes included 8 follicular lymphoma (FL), 7 marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) (1 splenic, 2 extranodal, and 4 nodal), 15 Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM), 1 lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, 1 small lymphocytic lymphoma, and 1 low‐grade B‐cell lymphoma with plasmacytic differentiation (unable to be classified better as MZL or LPL). Hematologic toxicity was the most common adverse event. Median time of follow‐up was 23.4 months (range 1.8–50.9). The overall response rate was 87.9%, with 30.3% complete response. The median duration of response was 38.7 months. The median progression free survival was 39.7 months, while median overall survival (OS) has not yet been reached. Lenalidomide can be safely added to a simple regimen of rituximab, oral cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone and is an effective combination as initial therapy for low‐grade B‐cell NHL.     

Randomized open label phase III trial of CEOP/IMVP-Dexa alternating chemotherapy and filgrastim versus CEOP/IMVP-Dexa alternating chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). A multi- center trial by the Austrian Working Group For Medical Tumor Therapy

 Primary end point of this trial was to reduce neutropenic infections during the treatment of aggressive NHL with CEOP/IMVP-Dexa (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine, prednisolone ifosfamide, methotrexate, VP-16, and dexamethasone). Further, we studied the influence of filgrastim on dose intensity of CEOP/IMVP-Dexa, on the rate of complete remissions, on the time to relapse, and on survival. Eighty-five patients with untreated large-cell NHL were randomized to one of two treatment arms; 74 patients were eligible. Thirty-eight patients in arm 1 were treated with CEOP/IMVP-Dexa chemotherapy and filgrastim, 36 in arm 2 with CEOP/IMVP-Dexa chemotherapy alone. In arm 1 filgrastim was self-injected by the patients at 5 μg/kg body wt. s.c. daily, except on the days when cytotoxic drugs were given. During treatment we did weekly complete blood counts. Median leukocyte counts were 10.91×10⁹/l and 5.46×10⁹/l in arm 1 and 2, respectively (p=10^–6). Median neutrophil counts were 7.7×10⁹/l in arm 1 and 2.72×10⁹/l in arm 2 (p<10^–6). Median neutrophil nadirs were 0.199×10⁹/l and 0.213×10⁹/l in arm 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.09). Mean platelet nadirs were 95 and 152×10⁹/l (p=0.000004) and mean hemoglobin nadirs 83.95 g/l and 92.78 g/l (p=0.00558) in arm 1 and 2, respectively. Dose intensity of CEOP/IMVP-Dexa was 82.3% and 76.2% in arm 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.041). Forty-two percent and 58% of patients experienced a febrile neutropenia in arm 1 and 2, respectively (not significant, NS). Median time to first neutropenic infection was in treatment week 11 and 6 in arm 1 and 2, respectively (NS). There was no significant difference in rate, duration, and kind of infection, duration of hospitalization, or antibiotic treatment. Seven toxic deaths occurred, all due to neutropenic infection, 6 and 1 in arm 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.0732). Four of the six patients, who died of infection in arm 1 were older than 60 years. Complete remission rate was 83% and 66.7% in arm 1 and 2, respectively (NS). After a median observation time of 3 years there was no difference in time to relapse or survival. Filgrastim increases leukocyte and neutrophil counts and dose intensity, if used with CEOP/IMVP-Dexa chemotherapy in high-grade lymphomas. There was no significant effect on febrile neutropenia or infections. The more frequent fatal neutropenic infection rate in the filgrastim arm was not statistically significant. It is most appropriate to explain it by the patient's age in combination with the high dose intensity. The small increase in dose intensity had no effect on survival but probably decreased hemoglobin levels and platelet counts in arm 1. We were unable to show a benefit for filgrastim in combination with CEOP/IMVP-Dexa. Received: 20 May 1997 / Accepted: 14 August 1997     

High‐dose cyclophosphamide without stem cell transplantation in systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective

High‐dose chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is increasingly being studied as a treatment for severe autoimmune disorders, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). High‐dose cyclophosphamide, the foundation of virtually all conditioning regimens for stem cell transplantation, is not myeloablative; therefore, when high‐dose cyclophosphamide is used alone, autografting, with its potential for reinfusing autoreactive effector cells, is not required. We undertook this study to investigate the safety and efficacy of high‐dose cyclophosphamide without stem cell transplantation in refractory SLE.

Methods

We treated 14 patients with moderate‐to‐severe SLE that had been refractory to corticosteroids and one or more additional immunosuppressive drugs. All patients received 50 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide for 4 consecutive days followed by 5 μg/kg granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor until the neutrophil count was 1 × 10⁹/liter for 2 consecutive days. Patients were followed up monthly for disease activity using the physician's global assessment, SLE Disease Activity Index, and assessment of functioning of involved organs. The Responder Index for Lupus Erythematosus was used to define partial or complete response.

Results

The median time to achieve a neutrophil count of 0.5 × 10⁹/liter was 14 days (range 11–22 days) after the last dose of cyclophosphamide. Patients required a median of 2 units (range 2–5) of packed red blood cells, and a median of 16 days (range 0–23 days) elapsed from the last dose of cyclophosphamide to the last platelet transfusion. There were no deaths or fungal infections. Significant improvements in physician's global assessment (mean difference 1.4; P < 0.0001), SLE Disease Activity Index (mean difference 4.1; P = 0.0039), and prednisone dosage (mean difference 14.9 mg/day; P = 0.002) were observed. Responses, including 5 durable complete responses, were observed in all organ systems (renal, central nervous system, and skin) with involvement that had led to patient enrollment.

Conclusion

High‐dose cyclophosphamide without stem cell transplantation leads to rapid hematopoietic reconstitution and has significant clinical benefit in patients with refractory SLE. Therefore, this approach deserves further study.

     

Clarithromycin (Biaxin)‐lenalidomide‐low‐dose dexamethasone (BiRd) versus lenalidomide‐low‐dose dexamethasone (Rd) for newly diagnosed myeloma

The objective of this case‐matched study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of the addition of clarithromycin (Biaxin) to lenalidomide/low‐dose dexamethasone (BiRd) vs. lenalidomide/low‐dose dexamethasone (Rd) for newly diagnosed myeloma. Data from 72 patients treated at the New York Presbyterian Hospital‐Cornell Medical Center were retrospectively compared with an equal number of matched pair mates selected among patients seen at the Mayo Clinic who received Rd. Case matching was blinded and was performed according to age, gender, and transplant status. On intention‐to‐treat analysis, complete response (45.8% vs. 13.9%, P < 0.001) and very‐good‐partial‐response or better (73.6% vs. 33.3%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher with BiRd. Time‐to‐progression (median 48.3 vs. 27.5 months, P = 0.071), and progression‐free survival (median 48.3 vs. 27.5 months, P = 0.044) were higher with BiRd. There was a trend toward better OS with BiRd (3‐year OS: 89.7% vs. 73.0%, P = 0.170). Main grade 3–4 toxicities of BiRd were hematological, in particular thrombocytopenia (23.6% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.012). Infections (16.7% vs. 9.7%, P = 0.218) and dermatological toxicity (12.5% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.129) were higher with Rd. Results of this case‐matchedanalysis suggest that there is significant additive value when clarithromycin is added to Rd. Randomized phase III trials are needed to confirm these results. Am. J. Hematol., 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Prechemotherapy neutrophil : lymphocyte ratio is superior to the platelet : lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic indicator for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

The study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of prechemotherapy neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio, and preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer. We analyzed retrospectively locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before undergoing a radical esophagectomy between 2009 and 2012. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio before chemotherapy and before the surgery were calculated. Univariate analyses showed that prechemotherapy neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >5 (P = 0.048, hazard ratio = 2.86; 95% confidence interval: 1.01–8.12) and prechemotherapy platelet to lymphocyte ratio >130 (P = 0.025, hazard ratio = 5.50; 95% confidence interval: 1.23–24.55) were associated significantly with overall survival (OS), and prechemotherapy platelet to lymphocyte ratio >130 (P = 0.026, hazard ratio = 3.18; 95% confidence interval: 1.15–8.85) was associated significantly with progression‐free survival. However, only prechemotherapy neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >5 (P = 0.024, hazard ratio = 3.50; 95% confidence interval: 1.18–10.40) remained significantly associated with OS in multivariate analyses. Neither preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio nor platelet to lymphocyte ratio was associated with OS or progression‐free survival. The prechemotherapy neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >5 to preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio ≤5 group showed significantly worse OS than the prechemotherapy neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio ≤5 to preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio ≤5 group (P = 0.050). The prechemotherapy platelet to lymphocyte ratio >130 to preoperative platelet to lymphocyte ratio ≤130 group (P = 0.016) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio >130 to preoperative platelet to lymphocyte ratio >130 group (P = 0.042) showed significantly worse OS than the prechemotherapy platelet to lymphocyte ratio ≤30 to preoperative platelet to lymphocyte ratio ≤130 group. In conclusions, prechemotherapy neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and, as an adverse prognostic predictor, increased prechemotherapy neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is superior to platelet to lymphocyte ratio. Maintaining a low neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio throughout treatment is a predictor of better OS.     

Analysis of very elderly (≥80 years) non-hodgkin lymphoma: impact of functional status and co-morbidities on outcome

Data on outcome, prognostic factors, and treatment for very elderly non‐Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) is sparse. We conducted a multicentre retrospective analysis of NHL patients ≥80 years (at diagnosis) treated between 1999 and 2009. Detailed characteristics were obtained including geriatric syndromes, activities of daily living (ADLs), and co‐morbidities using the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale‐Geriatrics (CIRS‐G). We identified 303 patients: 170 aggressive NHL (84% B cell/16% T cell) and 133 indolent NHL (82% B cell/18% T cell). Median age was 84 years (80–95). A geriatric syndrome was present in 26% of patients, 18% had ≥1 grade 4 CIRS‐G, and 14% had loss of ADLs. At 49‐month median follow‐up, 4‐year progression‐free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for aggressive NHLs were 31% and 44% respectively (stage I/II: PFS 53% and OS 66%; stage III/IV: PFS 20% and OS 32%; P < 0·0001 and 0·0002, respectively). Four‐year PFS and OS for indolent NHL were 44% and 66% respectively, regardless of stage. Multivariate regression analysis identified two key factors that predicted inferior PFS and OS for both NHL groups: lack of CR and loss of ADLs. Prospective studies for very elderly NHL that incorporate geriatric tools, especially ADLs, are warranted.     

Epirubicin,Cisplatin,5-FU combination chemotherapy in sorafenib-refractory metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM:To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of epirubicin,cisplatin,and 5-FU combination chemotherapy for the sorafenib-refractory metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).METHODS:From April 2009 to June 2012,31 patients who were diagnosed with metastatic and progressive HCC after sorafenib treatment were retrospectively reviewed.Patients were treated with the combination of epirubicin(50 mg/m2Ⅳ;day 1),cisplatin(60 mg/m2Ⅳ;day 1),and 5-FU(1000 mg/m2Ⅳ;day 1-3)[Epirubicin,cisplatin,5-FU combination(ECF)],repeated every 4 wk.RESULTS:The overall response rate was 12.9%.Patients who responded to ECF chemotherapy showed a longer overall survival(OS)and time to progression(TTP)relative to those in the non-responder group(OS:20.4 mo vs 4.9 mo,P<0.001,TTP:9.4 mo vs 2.2 mo,P<0.001).Patients with a stable primary liver mass also exhibited a longer OS and TTP relative to those with progressive disease(OS:13.4 mo vs 5.3 mo,P=0.003;TTP:9.4 mo vs 2.3 mo,P=0.003).The most common hematologic toxicity was thrombocytopenia(87.2%),and the incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was 53.9%.Age older than 60,a stable primary mass,and a good response to chemotherapy were prognostic factors for OS and TTP.CONCLUSION:This combination cytotoxic chemotherapy can serve as another treatment option after sorafenib failure for the subset of patients with advanced metastatic HCC.     

Dasatinib in imatinib‐resistant or ‐intolerant chronic‐phase,chronic myeloid leukemia patients: 7‐year follow‐up of study CA180‐034

Dasatinib was approved at 100 mg once daily for imatinib‐resistant or ‐intolerant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase, based on results of the phase 3 CA180‐034 (NCT00123474) study. Here we present the final 7‐year analysis of this pivotal study, the longest follow‐up to date of any second‐generation BCR–ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Patients (n = 670) with imatinib‐resistant or ‐intolerant CML in chronic phase received dasatinib. Nineteen percent of patients continued on study treatment, with a greater proportion in the 100 mg once daily arm remaining on therapy. Seven‐year rates for major molecular response (MMR), progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were similar across doses; MMR, PFS, and OS results were 46, 42, and 65% at 100 mg once daily, respectively. Improved PFS and OS rates were reported in patients who achieved BCR–ABL1 ≤10% at 3 and 6 months. No new safety signals were identified. The incidence of drug‐related pleural effusion was 28% at 100 mg once daily and 35% at the other three dose groups. Incidence of drug‐related pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary arterial hypertension remained low (≤3% across all doses). Arterial ischemic events occurred in ≤4% of patients across all doses. These data support the long‐term efficacy and well‐established safety profile of dasatinib for patients with imatinib‐resistant or ‐intolerant CML in chronic phase. Am. J. Hematol. 91:869–874, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Single versus tandem high‐dose melphalan followed by autologous blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: long‐term results from the phase III GMMG‐HD2 trial

The prospective, randomized phase III trial GMMG‐HD2 aimed at demonstrating non‐inferiority of single (Arm A) versus tandem (Arm B) high‐dose melphalan followed by autologous transplantation (HDM/ASCT) with regard to 2‐year event‐free survival (EFS) in newly‐diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) and included 358 evaluable patients [Intention‐to‐treat population, (ITT), single/tandem HDM/ASCT: n = 177/181]. After a median follow‐up of more than 11 years, non‐inferiority of single versus tandem HDM/ASCT was demonstrated using the planned non‐inferiority threshold of 15% of the 2‐year EFS rate. Neither EFS (P = 0·53) nor overall survival (OS) (P = 0·33) differences were observed in the ITT population. In the tandem arm, 26% (n = 47/181) of patients refused a second HDM/ASCT due to non‐medical reasons. A per‐protocol (PP) analysis, including patients who received the intervention (single/tandem HDM/ASCT: n = 156/93) and patients who did not receive a second HDM/ASCT due to medical reasons (12%, n = 22/181), did not yield differences in EFS (P = 0·61) or OS (P = 0·16). In the ITT and PP set of the tandem arm, the rates of complete responses increased from first to second HDM/ASCT (both P = 0·04). Ten‐year OS for the entire ITT was 34% (95% confidence interval: 29–40%). OS after first relapse was significantly shortened in the tandem arm (P = 0·04). In this study single HDM/ASCT was non‐inferior to tandem HDM/ASCT in MM.