Phase I study of carfilzomib,lenalidomide, vorinostat,and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma

Research has shown that proteasome inhibitors (e.g., carfilzomib), immunomodulatory agents (e.g., lenalidomide), histone deacetylase inhibitors (e.g., vorinostat) and corticosteroids (e.g., dexamethasone) have synergistic anti‐multiple myeloma (MM) activity. This phase I dose‐escalation study evaluated a regimen combining carfilzomib, lenalidomide, vorinostat and dexamethasone (QUAD) in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. Seventeen patients received carfilzomib (15, 20, or 20/27 mg/m²; 30‐min infusion; days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16), lenalidomide (15 or 25 mg; days 1–21), vorinostat (300 or 400 mg; days 1–7, 15–21), and dexamethasone (40 mg; days 1, 8, 15, 22) in 28‐d cycles. No dose‐limiting toxicities were observed; the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The maximum administered dose was carfilzomib 20/27 mg/m², lenalidomide 25 mg, vorinostat 400 mg, and dexamethasone 40 mg. Common grade ≥3 adverse events included neutropenia (53%), thrombocytopenia (53%) and anaemia (41%). The overall response rate was 53%: 12% of patients achieved a very good partial response (PR) and 41% of patients achieved a PR. At a median follow‐up of 10 months, median progression‐free survival was 12 months and median overall survival was not reached. Treatment with QUAD was feasible and had encouraging activity in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM.     

A phase IIb trial of vorinostat in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma refractory to previous lenalidomide‐containing regimens

Clinical trials of vorinostat, a Class I/II histone deacetylase inhibitor, in combination with proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents have shown activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. This phase IIb, open‐label, single‐institution study evaluated the efficacy of vorinostat in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in lenalidomide‐refractory patients. Patients were considered lenalidomide‐refractory if they had no clinical response (<minimal response) on a previous lenalidomide‐containing regimen (lenalidomide non‐responsive) or if they had progressive disease on or within 60 days of discontinuing a previous lenalidomide‐containing regimen (lenalidomide relapsed/refractory). Patients received oral vorinostat 400 mg days 1–7 and 15–21, lenalidomide 25 mg days 1–21, and dexamethasone 40 mg days 1, 8, 15 and 22 in 28‐day cycles. Twenty‐five patients were enrolled, median age was 65 years and patients had received a median of 5 prior regimens. The overall response rate was 24% (6 partial responses) and clinical benefit rate (≥stable disease) was 80%. Median time to a partial response was 1·9 months and median duration of response was 3·3 months. Median progression‐free survival was 5·3 months. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (48%), thrombocytopenia (32%), anaemia (20%) and gastrointestinal toxicities (16%). In this heavily pre‐treated population, vorinostat in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone was active in lenalidomide‐refractory patients.     

The addition of cyclophosphamide to lenalidomide and dexamethasone in multiply relapsed/refractory myeloma patients; a phase I/II study

We report the results of a Phase I/II dose escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cyclophosphamide when combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Thirty‐one patients were enrolled in cohorts of 3, at five dose levels of cyclophosphamide to a maximum of 700 mg on days 1 and 8 of a 28‐d cycle. Patients received lenalidomide 25 mg days 1–21 and dexamethasone 20 mg orally days 1–4 and 8–11. The MTD was 600 mg cyclophosphamide, days 1 and 8. Grade 3/4 haematological complications occurred in 26% of patients, grade 3/4 infection in 3% (both at 700 mg cyclophosphamide), with thromboembolic complications in 6% of patients. Overall complete response (CR) rate was 29%, very good partial response rate 7% and partial response rate 45% giving an overall response rate of 81%. After 21 months median follow‐up, projected 2‐year progression‐free survival was 56%, with 80% overall survival at 30 months. Ten further patients were treated at MTD with a 40% CR rate. No dose reductions for any study drugs or deaths occurred during cycles 1–9. Lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone is a safe, effective combination in relapsed myeloma inducing a high response rate, warranting further investigation in phase III trials.     

Mature results of MM‐011: A phase I/II trial of liposomal doxorubicin,vincristine, dexamethasone,and lenalidomide combination therapy followed by lenalidomide maintenance for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

A previous interim report of MM‐011, the first study that combined lenalidomide with anthracycline‐based chemotherapy followed by lenalidomide maintenance for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), showed promising safety and activity. We report the long‐term outcomes of all 76 treated patients with follow‐up ≥5 years. This single‐center phase I/II study administered lenalidomide (10 mg on days 1–21 of every 28‐day cycle), intravenous liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m² on day 1), dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1–4), and intravenous vincristine (2 mg on day 1). After 4–6 planned induction cycles, lenalidomide maintenance therapy was given at the last tolerated dose until progression, with or without 50 mg prednisone every other day. The median number of previous therapies was 3 (range, 1–7); 49 (64.5%) patients had refractory disease. Forty‐three (56.6%) patients received maintenance therapy. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred during induction and maintenance therapy in 48.7% and 25.6% of patients, respectively. Four (5.3%) treatment‐related deaths occurred during induction. Responses were seen in 53.0% (at least partial response) and 71.2% (at least minor response) of patients. Overall, median progression‐free survival and overall survival were 10.5 and 19.0 months, respectively; in patients with refractory disease these values were 7.5 and 11.3 months, respectively. Lenalidomide with anthracycline‐based chemotherapy followed by maintenance lenalidomide provided durable control in patients with RRMM ( ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00091624). Am. J. Hematol. 89:349–354, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A phase 2 study of modified lenalidomide,bortezomib and dexamethasone in transplant‐ineligible multiple myeloma

We sought a regimen that incorporates optimal novel agents and balances efficacy with toxicity in transplant‐ineligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Our study evaluated modified lenalidomide‐bortezomib‐dexamethasone (RVD lite) in this population and was administered over a 35‐day cycle. Lenalidomide 15 mg was given orally on days 1–21; bortezomib 1·3 mg/m² weekly subcutaneously on days 1, 8, 15 and 22; and dexamethasone 20 mg orally was given on the day of and day after bortezomib for 9 cycles followed by 6 cycles of consolidation with lenalidomide and bortezomib. The primary objective was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR); secondary objectives included safety, progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Fifty‐three eligible patients were screened between April 2013 and May 2015; 50 received at least one dose of therapy. Median age at study entry was 73 years (range 65–91). The ORR was 86% and 66% of patients achieved a very good partial response or better. Median PFS was 35·1 months (95% confidence interval 30·9–not reached) and median OS was not reached at a median follow‐up of 30 months. Peripheral neuropathy was reported in 31 (62%) patients with only 1 patient experiencing grade 3 symptoms. RVD lite is a well‐tolerated and highly effective regimen, with robust PFS and OS, in the transplant‐ineligible MM population.     

Bendamustine,lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (BRD) is highly effective with durable responses in relapsed multiple myeloma

Bendamustine is a multifunctional alkylating agent with single agent activity in myeloma. We designed the current phase 1/2 trial to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of bendamustine that can be safely combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone and to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination. Patients with relapsed MM following at least 1 prior therapy, but no more than four lines of prior therapy and with measurable disease were enrolled. Bendamustine 75 mg/m² given on days 1 and 2, lenalidomide 25 mg given days 1–21 and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, was the recommended Phase 2 dose. Seventy‐one patients were accrued: 21 on Phase 1 and 50 on Phase 2. The median age was 62.3 years; patients had a median of three prior lines of therapy (range 1–4), with over 70% of the patients having received prior lenalidomide, bortezomib, and/or peripheral blood stem cell transplant. Thirty‐four of 70 (49%) patients had a confirmed partial response or better, including 20 patients (29%) with a very good partial response or better. An additional 4 patients had a minor response, translating to an overall 55% clinical benefit rate. Grade 3 or higher toxicity was seen in 96% of patients, with ≥grade 3 hematologic in 94% and nonhematologic in 50%. The median progression free survival was 11.8 months and the median duration of response was 23 months. The combination of bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is very effective in relapsed multiple myeloma with high response rates and durable responses Am. J. Hematol. 90:1106–1110, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Upfront lower dose lenalidomide is less toxic and does not compromise efficacy for vulnerable patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma: final analysis of the phase II RevLite study

The combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone is an established treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Increasingly, treatment attenuation is advocated for frail/elderly patients to minimize toxicity even though there have been no prospective studies to demonstrate whether lenalidomide dose attenuation impacts on response and survival outcome. This prospective multicentre phase II study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of lower dose lenalidomide (15 mg) and dexamethasone (20 mg) in 149 eligible patients with relapsed/refractory MM aged over 59 years and/or with renal impairment. The overall response rate was 71% (complete response 15%). Median (range) progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8·9 (6·9–11·5) and 30·5 (20·0–36·2) months, respectively. Upon formal statistical comparison of these endpoints to that of a matched cohort of patients from the pivotal phase III MM009/MM010 studies who received standard‐dose lenalidomide (25 mg) and high‐dose dexamethasone (40 mg) no difference was seen in PFS (P = 0·34) and OS (P = 0·21). Importantly, grade 3–4 toxicities were reduced with low‐dose lenalidomide, mainly lower neutropenia (29% vs. 41%), infections (23% vs. 31%) and venous thromboembolism (3% vs. 13%). This study supports a strategy of lenalidomide dose reduction at the outset for at‐risk patients, and prospectively confirms that such an approach reduces adverse events while not compromising patient response or survival outcomes.     

An international,multicenter, prospective,observational study of neutropenia in patients being treated with lenalidomide + dexamethasone for relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RR‐MM)

Neutropenia is a well‐known dose‐limiting toxicity associated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone treatment in patients with multiple myeloma; however, little is known about its management and associated outcomes in the real world setting. The present prospective, multicenter, observational study evaluated the incidence, management, and outcomes of grade 3/4 neutropenia in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who initiated treatment with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone. Of 198 patients, 62 (31%, 95% CI: 25, 38) experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia, and half of these patients experienced 3 or more events during the 12‐month observational period. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred throughout lenalidomide treatment, with a median time to first event of 8.8 weeks (Q1, Q3: 5.9, 17.3). In a multivariate analysis, diagnosis of relapsed and refractory disease was associated with grade 3/4 neutropenia. Lenalidomide exposure reduction, use of G‐CSF, unplanned hospitalization, and outpatient clinic visits were more common in patients who experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia than in those who did not. In conclusion, grade 3/4 neutropenia is a common toxicity and patients are at continued risk throughout treatment with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Further efforts should be made to improve the recommendations for neutropenia management in this population. Am. J. Hematol. 91:806–811, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Twice‐weekly ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide‐dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Weekly ixazomib with lenalidomide‐dexamethasone (Rd) is feasible and has shown activity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. This phase 1/2 study (NCT01383928) evaluated the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of twice‐weekly ixazomib plus Rd in NDMM; 64 patients were enrolled across both phases. Patients received twice‐weekly oral ixazomib 3·0 or 3·7 mg plus lenalidomide 25 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg (10 mg in cycles 9–16) for up to sixteen 21‐day cycles, followed by maintenance with twice‐weekly ixazomib alone. No dose‐limiting toxicities were reported in cycle 1; the RP2D was 3·0 mg based on overall tolerability across multiple cycles. In 62 evaluable patients, the confirmed overall response rate was 94% (68% ≥very good partial response; 24% complete response). Median progression‐free survival was 24·9 months. Responses (median duration 36·9 months for patients receiving the RP2D) deepened during treatment. Grade 3 drug‐related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 64% of patients, including: rash, 13%; peripheral neuropathy, 8%; hyperglycaemia, 8%. There were no grade 4 drug‐related AEs. Thirteen patients discontinued due to AEs. Twice‐weekly ixazomib‐Rd offers substantial activity with promising long‐term outcomes in NDMM patients but may be associated with greater toxicity compared with weekly ixazomib‐Rd in this setting.     

Safety and efficacy of pomalidomide,dexamethasone and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Immunomodulatory drugs including thalidomide, lenalidomide (LEN) and pomalidomide (POM), are effective for treating multiple myeloma (MM). POM has shown enhanced efficacy with dexamethasone (DEX). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with bortezomib is US Food and Drug Administration‐approved for treating MM. PLD with LEN or thalidomide has shown efficacy for MM patients. LEN with DEX, PLD and bortezomib achieves high response rates. We evaluated the combination of POM with DEX 40 mg and PLD 5 mg/m² with the latter two drugs administered on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 on a 28‐day cycle for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM patients. During Phase 1, the maximum tolerated dose of POM was 4 mg, and was used in Phase 2, which also required patients to be refractory to LEN. However, neutropenia ≥ grade 3 was observed in 10/17 (59%) patients, and the dose was lowered to 3 mg. Median PFS was 5·4 months (range, 0·3–29·0 +  months). Overall response rates for patients in Phase 2 were 39% and 31% among subjects receiving POM at 3 mg and 4 mg, respectively, and clinical benefit rates were 51% and 44%, respectively. POM, PLD and DEX is a treatment option for relapsed/refractory MM patients including those who are refractory to LEN.     

Pomalidomide,cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for elderly patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A study of the Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party (KMMWP-164 study)

Patients with transplant-ineligible relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have a short life expectancy, especially when they have failed both the proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulator therapies. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (PCd) in elderly patients with RRMM. This phase 2 clinical trial recruited 55 elderly patients with RRMM. The patients underwent a 28-day treatment cycle: pomalidomide (4 mg/day on days 1-21, administered orally) and cyclophosphamide (400 mg/day on days 1, 8, and 15; administered orally) plus dexamethasone. The median (range) age of the patients was 73.3 (64-86) years, and 8 (14.5%) patients who were ≥ 80 years old. Eight (14.5%) and 31 (56.4%) patients exhibited stage III (revised international staging system) and frail status (simplified frailty scale), respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) of PCd therapy were 58.2% and 72.7%, respectively. The median PFS and median overall survival (OS) were 6.90 months (95% CI, 4.7-9.0) and 18.48 months (95% CI, 9.4-27.6), respectively. The incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 non-hematological toxicities was 70.8%. In particular, the incidence rate of primary infection was 45.4%, including 21.8% for pneumonia, 9.0% for sepsis, and 14.6% for febrile neutropenia. In conclusion, PCd is an effective regimen for elderly patients with RRMM who had failed both bortezomib and lenalidomide treatments, but in whom the treatment-associated infection is the main cause of morbidity and mortality.     

A phase 1 clinical trial evaluating marizomib,pomalidomide and low‐dose dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (NPI‐0052‐107): final study results

Marizomib (MRZ) is an irreversible, pan‐subunit proteasome inhibitor (PI) in clinical development for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and glioma. This study analysed MRZ, pomalidomide (POM) and low‐dose dexamethasone (Lo‐DEX) [PMD] in RRMM to evaluate safety and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Intravenous MRZ (0·3–0·5 mg/m²) was administered over 2 h on days 1, 4, 8, 11; POM (3–4 mg) on days 1–21; and Lo‐DEX (5 or 10 mg) on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 16, 22 and 23 of every 28‐day cycle. Thirty‐eight patients were enrolled that had received a median of 4 (range 1–10) prior lines of therapy; all patients received prior lenalidomide and bortezomib. No dose‐limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed and 0·5 mg/m² MRZ was determined to be the RP2D. The most common treatment‐related ≥Grade 3 adverse events were: neutropenia (11/38 patients: 29%), pneumonia (4/38 patients 11%), anaemia (4/38 patients; 11%) and thrombocytopenia (4/38 patients; 11%). The overall response rate and clinical benefit rate was 53% (19/36) and 64% (23/36), respectively. In conclusion, PMD was well tolerated and demonstrated promising activity in heavily pre‐treated, high‐risk RRMM patients.     

Combination of bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (BLD) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma is feasible and highly effective: results of phase 1/2 open-label, dose escalation study

This multicenter phase 1/2 trial investigated the combination of bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in repeating 4-week cycles as treatment for relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Phase 1 established maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Phase 2 assessed overall response rate at the MTD. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 29 evaluable patients were enrolled. Median age was 63 years (range, 38-80 years). Median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 1-6). MTD was bendamustine 75 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 2), lenalidomide 10 mg (days 1-21), and dexamethasone 40 mg (weekly) of a 28-day cycle. Partial response rate was 52%, with very good partial response achieved in 24%, and minimal response in an additional 24% of patients. Median follow-up was 13 months; median OS has not been reached. One-year OS is 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59%-99%). Median PFS is 6.1 months (95% CI, 3.7-9.4 months) with one-year PFS of 20% (95% CI, 6%-41%). Grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, hyperglycemia, and fatigue. This first phase 1/2 trial testing bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as treatment of relapsed refractory MM was feasible and highly active. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01042704.     

Lenalidomide is safe and active in Waldenström macroglobulinemia

Lenalidomide is manageable and effective in multiple myeloma, particularly in elderly patients. Surprisingly, the combination of lenalidomide with rituximab produced clinically significant anemia at 25 mg/day for 21/28 days, the highest possible dose, in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM). We aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of single agent lenalidomide and determine its impact on WM. RV‐WM‐0426 is a multicenter dose escalation open label phase 1/2 study of lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory WM (RRWM). Lenalidomide was given orally 21/28 days per cycle for 1 year, at escalated dose of 15 to 20 mg during phase 1 to determine the MTD; the phase 2 part was conducted at the MTD. Seventeen RRWM patients were included. The MTD was established at 15 mg/day 21/28. By ITT analysis, the overall response rate was 29%. With a median follow‐up of 36 months, median TTP was 16 months (95% CI 5.5–26), the 5‐year OS was 91%. The most frequent adverse events ≥ grade 3 at 15 mg were 14% anemia and 43% neutropenia. The MTD of lenalidomide is 15 mg/day 21/28 days in RRWM. Lenalidomide is active in the treatment of RRWM and the safety profile appears manageable. Future studies may look into combinations of lenalidomide and continuous dosing. Am. J. Hematol. 90:1055–1059, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Lenalidomide and vorinostat maintenance after autologous transplant in multiple myeloma

Single‐agent post‐autologous transplant maintenance therapy with lenalidomide is standard of care for patients with multiple myeloma. The tolerability and effectiveness of combination post‐transplant maintenance therapy is unknown, so we investigated lenalidomide and vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) in this setting, hypothesizing that the regimen would be well tolerated and associated with an improved post‐transplant response. This trial followed a standard 3 × 3 dose escalation phase 1 design. Vorinostat was administered beginning day +90 post‐haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for days 1–7 and 15–21, and lenalidomide was started at 10 mg days 1–21, both on a 28‐d cycle. The primary endpoint was maximum tolerated dose and dose limiting toxicities were assessed during the first cycle. Treatment was well tolerated in 16 enrolled patients. During Cycle 1, the most common toxicities included cytopenias, gastrointestinal complaints and fatigue. Seven patients improved their transplant response after starting combination therapy. The median follow‐up was 38·4 months, and the median progression‐free survival and overall survival have yet to be reached. This oral post‐transplant maintenance regimen was well tolerated. This is the first trial to publish results on the use of a histone deacetylase inhibitor in the maintenance setting, and it provides rationale for the ongoing randomized trial in maintenance (ISRCTN 49407852). Trial Registration: NCT00729118     

An open‐label phase I/II study of cyclophosphamide,bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin,and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed myeloma

We conducted a phase 1/2 trial evaluating the combination of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (CVDD) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). The primary objective of the phase 1 was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of maximum planned dose (MPD) and the phase 2 was to assess the overall response rate. Patients received 6–8 cycles of CVDD at four dose levels. There were no dose‐limiting toxicities. The MPD was cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m² IV on day 1, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² IV on days 1, 4, 8, 11, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m² IV on day 4, and dexamethasone 20 mg orally on the day of and after bortezomib (21‐d cycle). Forty‐nine patients were treated at the MPD of which 22% had high‐risk myeloma. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities included myelosuppression, infection, and fatigue. Overall response and complete response rates were 91% and 26% in standard‐risk, and 100% and 58% in high‐risk cohort, respectively. After a median follow‐up of 34 months, the median progression‐free survival was 31.3 months. The 2‐yr overall survival was 91.1% in the standard‐risk and 88.9% in the high‐risk cohort, respectively. CVDD regimen was well tolerated and was highly active in newly diagnosed MM.     

Multiple myeloma: 2016 update on diagnosis,risk‐stratification,and management

Multiple myeloma accounts for approximately 10% of hematologic malignancies.The diagnosis requires ≥10% clonal bone marrow plasma cells or a biopsy proven plasmacytoma plus evidence of one or more multiple myeloma defining events (MDE): CRAB (hyperc alcemia, r enal failure, a nemia, or lytic b one lesions) features felt related to the plasma cell disorder, bone marrow clonal plasmacytosis ≥60%, serum involved/uninvolved free light chain (FLC) ratio ≥100 (provided involved FLC is ≥100 mg/L), or >1 focal lesion on magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with del(17p), t(14;16), and t(14;20) have high‐risk multiple myeloma. Patients with t(4;14) translocation and gain(1q) have intermediate‐risk. All others are considered standard‐risk. Initial treatment consists of bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (VRD). In high‐risk patients, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (KRD) is an alternative to VRD. In eligible patients, initial therapy is given for approximately 3–4 months followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Standard risk patients can opt for delayed ASCT at first relapse. Patients not candidates for transplant are treated with Rd until progression, or alternatively, a triplet regimen such as VRD for approximately 12–18 months. After ASCT, lenalidomide maintenance is considered for standard risk patients especially in those who are not in very good partial response or better, while maintenance with a bortezomib‐based regimen is needed for patients with intermediate or high‐risk disease. Patients with indolent relapse can be treated with 2‐drug or 3‐drug combinations. Patients with more aggressive relapse require a triplet regimen or a combination of multiple active agents. Am. J. Hematol. 91:720–734, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Low-dose lenalidomide and dexamethasone combination treatment in elderly patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

Objective: This study investigated the efficacy and safety of low-dose lenalidomide combined with dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM).

Methods: Thirty-two elderly patients with refractory and recurrent MM (median age: 64 years) were treated with low-dose lenalidomide (LD-R) combined with dexamethasone (D). LD-R (10?mg/d) was administered orally for 21 days and D (40?mg/d) was administered twice a day on days 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20. The treatment lasted 2–8 28-day cycles.

Results: After two cycles, the complete, very good partial, and partial remission rates were 12.5% (4/32), 25.0% (8/32), and 34.4% (11/32), respectively. The overall response rate was 71.9% (23/32). After a 24-month follow-up, 23 patients responded to therapy, three were in complete remission, four were stable, and 16 exhibited disease progression. In addition, median time-to-progression was 13 months. Observed side effects were hypodynamia, gastrointestinal reaction, peripheral neuritis, and mild hypocytosis.

Conclusion: Low-dose lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone is an effective and safe treatment for relapsed and refractory MM in elderly patients.     

A phase 2 study of lenalidomide,rituximab, cyclophosphamide,and dexamethasone (LR‐CD) for untreated low‐grade non‐Hodgkin lymphoma requiring therapy

Patients with indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) have multiple treatment options yet there is no consensus as to the best initial therapy. Lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory agent, has single agent activity in relapsed lymphoma. This trial was conducted to assess feasibility, efficacy, and safety of adding lenalidomide to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (LR‐CD) in untreated indolent NHL patients requiring therapy. This was a single institution phase II trial. Treatment consisted of IV rituximab 375 mg/m² day 1; oral lenalidomide 20 mg days 1–21; cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m² days 1, 8, and 15; and dexamethasone 40 mg days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28‐day cycle. Treatment continued 2 cycles beyond best response for a maximum of 12 cycles without rituximab maintenance. Thirty‐three patients were treated. Median age was 68 (43–83 years). 39% had stage IV disease. Histologic subtypes included 8 follicular lymphoma (FL), 7 marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) (1 splenic, 2 extranodal, and 4 nodal), 15 Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM), 1 lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, 1 small lymphocytic lymphoma, and 1 low‐grade B‐cell lymphoma with plasmacytic differentiation (unable to be classified better as MZL or LPL). Hematologic toxicity was the most common adverse event. Median time of follow‐up was 23.4 months (range 1.8–50.9). The overall response rate was 87.9%, with 30.3% complete response. The median duration of response was 38.7 months. The median progression free survival was 39.7 months, while median overall survival (OS) has not yet been reached. Lenalidomide can be safely added to a simple regimen of rituximab, oral cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone and is an effective combination as initial therapy for low‐grade B‐cell NHL.