A randomized trial of iron isomaltoside versus iron sucrose in patients with iron deficiency anemia

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is common in many chronic diseases, and intravenous (IV) iron offers a rapid and efficient iron correction. This trial compared the efficacy and safety of iron isomaltoside and iron sucrose in patients with IDA who were intolerant of, or unresponsive to, oral iron. The trial was an open‐label, comparative, multi‐center trial. Five hundred and eleven patients with IDA from different causes were randomized 2:1 to iron isomaltoside or iron sucrose and followed for 5 weeks. The cumulative dose of iron isomaltoside was based on body weight and hemoglobin (Hb), administered as either a 1000 mg infusion over more than 15 minutes or 500 mg injection over 2 minutes. The cumulative dose of iron sucrose was calculated according to Ganzoni and administered as repeated 200 mg infusions over 30 minutes. The mean cumulative dose of iron isomaltoside was 1640.2 (standard deviation (SD): 357.6) mg and of iron sucrose 1127.9 (SD: 343.3) mg. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a Hb increase ≥2 g/dL from baseline at any time between weeks 1‐5. Both non‐inferiority and superiority were confirmed for the primary endpoint, and a shorter time to Hb increase ≥2 g/dL was observed with iron isomaltoside. For all biochemical efficacy parameters, faster and/or greater improvements were found with iron isomaltoside. Both treatments were well tolerated; 0.6% experienced a serious adverse drug reaction. Iron isomaltoside was more effective than iron sucrose in achieving a rapid improvement in Hb. Furthermore, iron isomaltoside has an advantage over iron sucrose in allowing higher cumulative dosing in fewer administrations. Both treatments were well tolerated in a broad population with IDA.     

A prospective,multi-center,randomized comparison of iron isomaltoside 1000 versus iron sucrose in patients with iron deficiency anemia; the FERWON-IDA trial

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is prevalent, and intravenous iron, especially if given in a single dose, may result in better adherence compared with oral iron. The present trial (FERWON-IDA) is part of the FERWON program with iron isomaltoside 1000/ferric derisomaltose (IIM), evaluating safety and efficacy of high dose IIM in IDA patients of mixed etiologies. This was a randomized, open-label, comparative, multi-center trial conducted in the USA. The IDA patients were randomized 2:1 to a single dose of 1000 mg IIM, or iron sucrose (IS) administered as 200 mg intravenous injections, up to five times. The co-primary endpoints were adjudicated serious or severe hypersensitivity reactions, and change in hemoglobin from baseline to week eight. A total of 1512 patients were enrolled. The frequency of patients with serious or severe hypersensitivity reactions was 0.3% (95% confidence interval: 0.06;0.88) vs 0.4% (0.05;1.45) in the IIM and IS group, respectively. The co-primary safety objective was met, and no risk difference was observed between groups. The co-primary efficacy endpoint of non-inferiority in hemoglobin change was met, and IIM led to a significantly more rapid hematological response in the first two weeks. The frequency of cardiovascular events was 0.8% and 1.2% in the IIM and IS group, respectively (P = .570). The frequency of hypophosphatemia was low in both groups. Iron isomaltoside administered as 1000 mg resulted in a more rapid and more pronounced hematological response, compared with IS, which required multiple visits. The safety profile was similar with a low frequency of hypersensitivity reactions and cardiovascular events.     

Comparative safety of intravenous ferumoxytol versus ferric carboxymaltose in iron deficiency anemia: A randomized trial

Few trials have examined rates of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) with intravenous iron formulations used to treat iron deficiency anemia (IDA). This randomized, multicenter, double‐blind clinical trial compared the safety, and efficacy of ferumoxytol versus ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), focusing on rates of HSRs and hypotension as the primary end point. Patients with IDA of any etiology in whom oral iron was unsatisfactory or intolerable received ferumoxytol (n = 997) or FCM (n = 1000) intravenously over ≥15 minutes on days 1 and 8 or 9 for total respective doses of 1.02 g and 1.50 g. Composite incidences of moderate‐to‐severe HSRs, including anaphylaxis, or moderate‐to‐severe hypotension from baseline to week 5 (primary safety end point) were 0.6% and 0.7% in the ferumoxytol and FCM groups, respectively, with ferumoxytol noninferior to FCM. No anaphylaxis was reported in either group. The secondary safety end point of incidences of moderate‐to‐severe HSRs, including anaphylaxis, serious cardiovascular events, and death from baseline to week 5 were 1.3% and 2.0% in the ferumoxytol and FCM groups, respectively (noninferiority test P < .0001). Least‐squares mean changes in hemoglobin at week 5 were 1.4 g/dL and 1.6 g/dL in the ferumoxytol and FCM groups, respectively (noninferiority test P < .0001). Incidence of hypophosphatemia was 0.4% for ferumoxytol and 38.7% for FCM.     

Intravenous iron sucrose versus oral iron supplementation for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease--a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter study

OBJECTIVES: Anemia is a frequent complication in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The optimal route for iron supplementation to replenish iron stores has not been determined so far. We therefore evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous iron sucrose as compared with oral iron sulfate for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in patients with IBD. METHODS: A randomized, prospective, open-label, multicenter study was performed in 46 patients with anemia and transferrin saturation 相似文献   

Hepcidin levels predict nonresponsiveness to oral iron therapy in patients with iron deficiency anemia

Levels of hepcidin, a major regulator of iron homeostasis, may identify patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) who will not respond to oral iron therapy. In this study, IDA patients underwent a 14‐day trial (run‐in) course of ferrous sulfate therapy. Nonresponders (Hgb increase <1 g/dL with 67% compliance rate) were randomized to IV ferric carboxymaltose (FCM; two injections of 750 mg) or further oral iron for 14 days. Screening hepcidin levels were 38.4 versus 11.3 ng/mL, P = 0.0002 in nonresponders versus responders to a trial of oral iron. Hepcidin of > 20 ng/mL, showed sensitivity of 41.3%, specificity of 84.4%, and positive predictive value of 81.6% for predicting nonresponsiveness to oral iron. PPVs for ferritin> 30 ng/mL or transferrin saturation (TSAT)>15% were 59.2 and 55%, respectively. Negative predictive values for hepcidin, ferritin, and TSAT were 46.3, 22.7, and 19.7, respectively. FCM versus oral iron showed Hgb increases of ≥1 gm/dL in 65.3% versus 20.8% (P < 0.0001) and Hgb increases of 1.7 ± 1.3 versus 0.6 ± 0.9 g/dL (P = 0.0025), respectively. We conclude that hepcidin predicts nonresponsiveness to oral iron in patients with IDA and is superior to TSAT or ferritin for this purpose. Nonresponse to oral iron therapy does not rule out IDA, since two‐thirds of patients subsequently responded to intravenous iron. Am. J. Hematol. 88:97–101, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with POEMS syndrome: results of a prospective,open‐label trial

Given its anti‐angiogenic activity, lenalidomide may have a role in the treatment of POEMS (P eripheral neuropathy, O rganomegaly, E ndocrinopathy, M onoclonal plasma cell disorder and S kin changes) syndrome. This prospective, open‐label, pilot study evaluated the combination of lenalidomide + dexamethasone (RD) in 18 POEMS syndrome patients (13 pre‐treated, 5 newly‐diagnosed but ineligible for high‐dose therapy). Treatment consisted of six cycles of lenalidomide (25 mg/day for 21 days followed by 7 days rest) plus dexamethasone (40 mg/once a week). Patients responding after six cycles continued treatment until progression or unbearable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with either neurological or clinical improvement. The RD combination was considered as deserving further evaluation if 9 of the first 15 patients responded. Ten responses were observed among the first 15 enrolled patients, meeting the primary endpoint. Fifteen of 18 patients (83%) completed six RD cycles: 13 (72%) patients responded and nine had both clinical and neurological improvement. Among the 15 patients who completed the six RD cycles, four were still on treatment after a 25‐month follow‐up. At 39 months of follow‐up, all patients were alive with a 3‐year progression‐free survival of 59%. No patient discontinued RD for toxicity. Overall, the RD regimen showed a high incidence of prolonged symptoms improvement and was well tolerated in most POEMS patients.     

Liraglutide is effective and well tolerated in combination with an oral antidiabetic drug in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, 52‐week,open‐label,parallel‐group trial

Introduction

The safety and efficacy of liraglutide in combination with an oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) compared with combination of two OADs were assessed in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Materials and Methods

This was a 52‐week, open‐label, parallel‐group trial in which patients whose type 2 diabetes was inadequately controlled with a single OAD (glinide, metformin, α‐glucosidase inhibitor or thiazolidinedione) were randomized 2:1 to either pretrial OAD in combination with liraglutide 0.9 mg/day (liraglutide group; n = 240) or pretrial OAD in combination with an additional OAD (additional OAD group; n = 120). The primary outcome measure was the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

Results

Overall, 86.3% of patients in the liraglutide group and 85.0% of patients in the additional OAD group experienced AEs; these were similar in nature and severity. Adverse event rates were 361 and 331 per 100 patient‐years of exposure, respectively. Confirmed hypoglycemia was rare (seven episodes in two patients on liraglutide, and two in two patients on additional OAD). There were no reported pancreatitis events, and no unexpected safety signals were identified. Mean reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin were significantly greater in the liraglutide group than the additional OAD group [estimated mean treatment difference −0.27% (95% confidence interval (CI) −0.44, −0.09; P = 0.0026)]; reductions in mean fasting plasma glucose levels were also greater with liraglutide [estimated mean difference −5.47 mg/dL (−0.30 mmol/L; 95% CI: −10.83, −0.10; P = 0.0458)].

Conclusions

Liraglutide was well tolerated and effective as combination therapy with an OAD in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Efficacy and safety of IV ferumoxytol for adults with iron deficiency anemia previously unresponsive to or unable to tolerate oral iron

Although oral iron is the initial treatment approach for iron deficiency anemia (IDA), some patients fail to respond to or cannot tolerate oral iron. This double‐blind safety and efficacy study of the intravenous (IV) iron, ferumoxytol, randomized patients with a history of unsatisfactory oral iron therapy, or in whom oral iron could not be used, to ferumoxytol (n = 609) or placebo (n = 203). The proportion of patients achieving the primary endpoint (hemoglobin increase ≥2.0 g/dL at Week 5) was 81.1% with ferumoxytol versus 5.5% with placebo (P < 0.0001). The mean increase in hemoglobin from Baseline to Week 5, a secondary endpoint (also the alternative preplanned primary efficacy endpoint for other health authorities), was 2.7 versus 0.1 g/dL (P < 0.0001). Achievement of a hemoglobin ≥12 g/dL, time to a hemoglobin increase ≥2.0 g/dL, and improvement in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue score also significantly favored ferumoxytol over placebo at Week 5 (P < 0.0001). Ferumoxytol treatment‐emergent adverse events were mainly mild to moderate. Ferumoxytol was effective and well tolerated in patients with IDA of any underlying cause in whom oral iron was ineffective or could not be used. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01114139. Am. J. Hematol. 89:7–12, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Comparison of zinc acetate hydrate and polaprezinc for zinc deficiency in patients on maintenance hemodialysis: A single‐center,open‐label,prospective randomized study

The efficacy and safety of zinc acetate hydrate (ZAH) for zinc supplementation in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) remains unknown. In this prospective, single‐center, open‐label, parallel‐group trial for MHD patients with serum zinc level <70 μg/dL, we compared ZAH (zinc; 50 mg/day) and polaprezinc (PPZ; zinc; 34 mg/day) beyond 6‐month administration in a 1:1 randomization manner. The ZAH and PPZ groups had 44 and 47 patients, respectively. At 3 months, the change rate of serum zinc levels in the ZAH group was significantly higher than that in the PPZ group. Three months after the study, serum copper levels significantly decreased in the ZAH group, but not in the PPZ group. No significant differences were noted in anemia management in either group. ZAH was superior to PPZ in increasing serum zinc levels. Clinicians should note the stronger decline in serum copper levels when using ZAH for MHD patients.     

Etanercept combined with conventional treatment in Wegener's granulomatosis: A six‐month open‐label trial to evaluate safety

Objective

To evaluate the safety of etanercept (Enbrel) in patients receiving conventional treatment for Wegener's granulomatosis (WG).

Methods

We performed a 6‐month open‐label trial of etanercept (25 mg subcutaneously twice weekly) which was added to standard therapies for WG (glucocorticoids, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, cyclosporine) and prescribed according to disease severity. Evaluations of clinical response were determined by the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for WG (BVAS/WG) in 20 patients with persistently active disease or with new flares of previously established WG. Fourteen of the 20 patients (70%) had etanercept added as the only new therapeutic variable.

Results

Injection site reactions (ISRs) were the most common adverse event related to etanercept (8 episodes in 5 patients [25%]; <1% of all injections). All ISRs were mild. Two patients had a combined total of 5 hospitalizations (1 patient had 4), but no hospitalizations were attributable solely to etanercept‐related adverse events. One patient with severe subglottic stenosis developed pneumococcal tracheobronchitis and subsequently had a localized Herpes zoster infection. Nineteen patients (95%) were still taking etanercept at 6 months, the single exception being a patient who developed progression of orbital (retro‐bulbar) disease at 4 months. There were no deaths. The mean BVAS/WG at entry was 3.6 (range 1–8), which decreased at 6 months to 0.6 (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] −4.0 to −2.1). Among the 14 patients in whom etanercept was the only new treatment variable, the mean daily prednisone dose decreased from 12.9 mg at entry to 6.4 mg at 6 months. This comparison did not achieve statistical significance (difference −6.5; P = 0.19, 95% CI −16.6 to +3.6). Sixteen of the patients (80%) achieved BVAS/WG scores of 0 at some point. However, intermittently active disease was observed in 15 patients (75%).

Conclusion

In this open‐label trial, etanercept used in combination with standard treatments was well‐tolerated in patients with WG. Adverse events were few. BVAS/WG scores improved at 6 months, but intermittently active WG (occasionally severe) was common. A randomized, double‐masked trial to assess the efficacy of etanercept in WG has begun.

     

Efficacy and safety of romiplostim in refractory aplastic anaemia: a Phase II/III,multicentre, open‐label study

A previous dose‐finding study has suggested that romiplostim is effective in patients with refractory aplastic anaemia (AA) and 10 µg/kg once weekly was recommended as a starting dose. In this Phase II/III, multicentre, open‐label study, romiplostim was administered subcutaneously at a fixed dose of 10 µg/kg once weekly for 4 weeks (weeks 1–4) followed by weekly doses (5, 10, 15 and 20 µg/kg) titrated by platelet response for up to 52 weeks (weeks 5–52). A total of 31 patients with AA who were refractory to immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and thrombocytopenia (platelet count of ≤30 × 10⁹/l) were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint of the proportion of patients achieving any haematological (platelet, neutrophil and erythrocyte) response at week 27 was 84% [95% confidence interval (CI) 66–95%]. Trilineage response was 39% (95% CI 22–58%) at week 53. The most common treatment‐related adverse events (AEs) were headache and muscle spasms (each 13%). All AEs were mild or moderate except for three patients with Grade 3 hepatic AEs; no AEs necessitated romiplostim discontinuation. Two patients developed cytogenetic abnormalities, of whom one returned to normal karyotype at last follow‐up. High‐dose romiplostim is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with AA refractory to IST.