Specific side effects of long-term imipramine management of panic disorder

In a recent study, the authors suggested that tachycardia, dry mouth, and sweating continued to burden patients with panic disorder with agoraphobia who have shown marked and stable response to 6 months of imipramine treatment at the fixed, weight-adjusted dose of 2.25 mg/kg/day. Although sexual dysfunction and weight gain were not a significant burden in that study, they are important problems in long-term treatment with antidepressant drugs. In the present study, in the context of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 1-year discontinuation and maintenance study of 53 patients with panic disorder with agoraphobia who respond to imipramine, the authors examine the extent and the specificity of these five side effects of imipramine maintenance using data at pretreatment, at the end of 24 weeks of open imipramine treatment (or month 0 of randomization), and at months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 of randomized treatment. Hierarchical linear modeling and repeated measures of analyses of variance in subsamples of completers confirmed that dry mouth, sweating, and increased heart rate constitute a significant and specific enduring burden of imipramine maintenance treatment. The data also revealed that weight gain is a significant and specific side effect of 1-year imipramine maintenance treatment; however, the likelihood of reporting sexual dysfunction decreased over time, with no difference between the placebo and imipramine maintenance conditions. The results are discussed in the context of previous studies of imipramine side effects in the management of depression and the available literature of sexual and weight side effects of antidepressant medications in the treatment of anxiety disorders.     

A dose-finding and discontinuation study of clomipramine in panic disorder

Eighty-one panic disorder patients with or without agoraphobia were treated with flexible doses of clomipramine under single-blind conditions. Fifty-seven (70.3%) reached operational criteria for full remission in 16.2 +/- 6.5 weeks, with a mean dose of 89.1 +/- 8.2 mg/day. Fifty-four (81%) of them received a continuous post-remission maintenance treatment at full doses of clomipramine for 4-6 months. No patient relapsed during the clomipramine maintenance phase. Their medication was then tappered and discontinued with placebo substitution under double-blind conditions. Fifty-one (63%) patients were followed-up until relapse or recurrence for up to 3 years, with periodic assessments. Three different outcome groups were identified: the first (n = 19, 19; 37.2%) experienced an early/immediate relapse (5.2 +/- 4.9 weeks after drug discontinuation); the second group (n = 22, 22; 43.1%) experienced recurrence after 42.9 +/- 35 weeks following discontinuation; and the third group (n = 10, 10; 19.6%) remained assymptomatic and functionally well throughout the follow-up. Predictors of early relapse were: (1) higher baseline score in the Beck Depression Inventory; (2) higher global score on the phobic avoidance scale after the full remission criteria; and (3) the need for higher clomipramine doses to reach full remission. The need for long-term or intermittent maintenance for most patients is emphasized.     

Effects of gradual discontinuation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in panic disorder with agoraphobia

The aim of this investigation was to explore the prevalence and features of discontinuation syndromes ensuing with gradual tapering of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), in optimal clinical conditions in patients with panic disorder and agoraphobia. Twenty-six consecutive outpatients met the DSM-IV criteria for panic disorder and agoraphobia while taking SSRIs. Twenty remitted upon behavioural treatment. Antidepressant drugs were then tapered at the slowest possible pace and with appropriate patient education. Patients were assessed with the Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) checklist 2 wk, 1 month and 1 yr after discontinuation. Nine of the 20 patients (45%) experienced a discontinuation syndrome, which subsided within a month in all but three patients who had been taking paroxetine for a long time. Discontinuation syndromes appeared to be fairly common even when performed with slow tapering and during clinical remission. In some cases disturbances persisted for months after discontinuation.     

Maintenance efficacy of divalproex in the prevention of bipolar depression.

Breakthrough depression is a common problem in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Only one, recently published, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial has examined the efficacy of divalproex in the prevention of depressive episodes in bipolar patients. This report describes, in further detail, the findings from that trial of the effect of divalproex on multiple dimensions of depressive morbidity in bipolar disorder. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study was conducted over a 52-week maintenance period. Bipolar I patients, who may have been treated with open-label lithium or divalproex and who met recovery criteria within 3 months of onset of an index manic episode, were randomized to maintenance treatment with divalproex, lithium, or placebo in a 2 : 1 : 1 ratio. Adjunctive paroxetine or sertraline for breakthrough depression was allowed in maintenance phase. Outcome measures were the rate of early discontinuation for depression, time to depressive relapse, proportion of patients with depressive relapse, mean change in Depressive Syndrome Scale score, proportion of patients receiving antidepressants, and time in the study. Among patients taking an antidepressant, a higher percentage of patients on placebo than divalproex discontinued early for depression. Patients who were previously hospitalized for affective episodes or took divalproex in the open period relapsed later on divalproex than on lithium during the maintenance period. Divalproex-treated patients had less worsening of depressive symptoms than lithium-treated patients during maintenance. Indices of severity of prestudy illness course predicted worse outcome in all treatment groups. Divalproex improved several dimensions of depressive morbidity and reduced the probability of depressive relapse in bipolar disorder, particularly in patients who had responded to divalproex when manic, and among patients with a more severe course of illness.     

Clomipramine, a better reference drug for panic/agoraphobia. I. Effectiveness comparison with imipramine

An 8-week, double-blind, flexible-dose trial comparing low doses of clomipramine (mean=50 mg) with moderate doses of imipramine (mean=113.8 mg and propanteline (active placebo), was carried out in 60 out-patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. Efficacy evaluation included global, anxiety and depression rating scales, and the determination of rates of relapse over up to 10 weeks of single-blind placebo follow-up. Both tricyclics were significantly more effective than propanteline, but clomipramine tended to act faster and more consistently than imipramine on most measures. Given the degree of blindness achieved and the significantly lower doses of clomipramine, this seems a better reference drug than imipramine for clinical trials in panic/agoraphobia.     

The safety and efficacy of tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate (De-Nol) maintenance therapy in patients with duodenal ulceration

Seventy-one patients whose duodenal ulcers had healed after a 4-week treatment period with tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate (TDB) were randomly allocated to receive maintenance treatment with either one TDB swallow tablet nocte (equivalent to 120 mg Bi2O3) or an identical placebo. During 12 months of follow-up, no side-effects were reported by TDB-treated patients, blood bismuth levels did not rise above discontinuation threshold concentrations (greater than 50 micrograms/L in the first 6 months, or greater than 100 micrograms/L in the second 6 months), and there were no adverse effects on haematological or biochemical indices. Ulcer relapse was significantly less in TDB-treated patients (P less than 0.025). Cumulative relapse rates at 6 and 12 months were 51% and 66%, respectively, for placebo-treated patients and 26% and 31%, respectively, for those who received TDB. It is likely that TDB is a safe and effective maintenance treatment for patients with duodenal ulcer disease.     

Imipramine and buspirone in patients with panic disorder who are discontinuing long-term benzodiazepine therapy

Pretreatment with imipramine, buspirone, or placebo was compared in 40 patients meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition criteria for panic disorder and in patients who were discontinuing long-term benzodiazepine use. The average duration of benzodiazepine use was 75 +/- 64 months, and the average benzodiazepine intake expressed as diazepam equivalents was 25.7 +/- 19 mg/d. We hypothesized that pretreatment with either imipramine or buspirone, in contrast to pretreatment with placebo, would lead to a significant decrease of symptoms of anxiety and depression before tapering benzodiazepines, thus making the taper process easier to complete. All 3 treatments (imipramine, buspirone, and placebo) caused a reduction in anxiety and depression symptoms as measured by changes in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Neither discontinuation severity nor taper-free status 12 weeks posttaper differed between the 3 treatment groups.     

Clomipramine, a better reference drug for panic/agoraphobia. II. Psychomotor and cognitive effects

The present reference drugs for the treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia are imipramine and alprazolam. The latter decreases performance and cognitive functioning. No study of such functions in panic/agoraphobia is available. Fifty four out-patients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (PAG), taking part in a parallel groups controlled trial of imipramine (mean dose ±SEM 114±9 mg), clomipramine (50±4 mg) and propanteline (active placebo) over 8 weeks, were studied. A test battery of psychomotor and memory tests was administered at baseline, and after 1, 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. Their results were compared (at baseline and at the end of the trial) with those of a control group of 57 normal untreated subjects. There was no difference between treatments, and no drug effect on any test at any time. No consistent difference between patients and controls was detected. Given its apparently higher potency, and the absence of deleterious effects on cognitive measures known to be affected by benzodiazepines, we conclude that clomipramine is better than imipramine or alprazolam as a reference drug for panic/agoraphobia.     

Do antidepressants selectively suppress spontaneous (unexpected) panic attacks? A replication

The purpose of this study was to test the following interrelated hypotheses in a larger sample by attempting to replicate supportive results from a small therapeutic study: (1) the pathogenesis of panic disorder includes at least two identifiable components: a biological component represented by spontaneous (unexpected) panic attacks, and a cognitive component represented by situational attacks and especially by phobias; (2) these components respond differently to treatment; (3) many biological processes respond to an effective intervention in proportion to their deviance from "normal" prior to treatment ("Law of Initial Value"); and (4) the response of spontaneous panic attacks to an effective treatment conforms to that model. Previously, the authors reanalyzed an 8-week therapeutic study of panic disorder that included groups treated with placebo and with imipramine (225 mg daily). The criteria of response were spontaneous panic attacks (biological component), situational panic attacks (both components), and agoraphobia ratings (cognitive component). The analyses compared the regression lines for posttreatment status on pretreatment status in the imipramine and placebo groups. The effect of imipramine on spontaneous panic attacks fitted the hypothesized model: the pre-post slope in the placebo group was approximately 1 (45 degrees), whereas the slope in the imipramine group was approximately 0. There was no significant difference in pre-post slopes between the imipramine and placebo groups for situational panic attacks or agoraphobia ratings. For this report, the authors applied the same approach to another larger data set from a study using a similar design, but a different antidepressant. In this multicenter, double-blind study, patients with panic disorder were randomly assigned to receive 10 weeks of treatment with placebo (N = 78) or fluoxetine 10 mg (N = 84) or 20 mg (N = 81) daily. Spontaneous and situational panic attacks were registered in a daily diary, and agoraphobia was rated at each visit. Using baseline and endpoint data, fluoxetine had a statistically significant, dose-dependent, suppressive effect on spontaneous panic attacks, as measured by the pre-post slopes in the three treatment groups. The placebo group showed some response (slope = 0.69). There were no significant drug effects on situational panic attacks. On ratings of agoraphobia, the slopes in the placebo and the fluoxetine 20 mg groups did not differ, but the slope in the fluoxetine 10 mg group was significantly less than that in the placebo group, suggesting a therapeutic drug effect on agoraphobia only at the lower dose. These results are consistent with the stated hypotheses. They suggest that the therapeutic effects of antidepressants on panic disorder may be due primarily to the specific suppression of spontaneous panic attacks among patients with high baseline pathologic findings. Implications of these results for concepts of pathogenesis, clinical practice, and therapeutic research regarding panic disorder are discussed.     

Cost effectiveness of acute imipramine therapy versus two imipramine maintenance treatment regimens for panic disorder

OBJECTIVE: To examine the medical costs and effectiveness of acute treatment with imipramine versus acute treatment plus 2 different maintenance therapies for panic disorder. METHODS: A clinical decision model was constructed to estimate 18-month costs and outcomes associated with these treatment scenarios based on the medical literature and clinician judgment. The clinical parameters and outcomes for the model were derived from a series of systematic clinical trials with imipramine utilising uniform dosage procedures and validated response criteria. Costs were calculated based on standardised treatment regimens. The outcome measures were 18-month medical costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs per QALY gained. A sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the impact of treatment withdrawals on outcomes. STUDY PERSPECTIVE: US mental healthcare system. RESULTS: Over 18 months, the total costs (1997 values) and QALYs associated with half-dose maintenance therapy (imipramine 1.1 mg/kg/day) [$US3377; QALYs = 0.991] and full-dose maintenance therapy (imipramine 2.25 mg/kg/ day) [$US3361; QALYs = 0.991] were almost identical; both were cost saving compared with acute imipramine therapy (2.25 mg/kg/day) with no maintenance treatment ($US3691; QALYs = 0.979). Whether patients withdrawing from treatment were considered to have continued to respond to treatment or to have relapsed, the half-dose and full-dose maintenance treatments were still cost saving compared with acute treatment alone. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that imipramine maintenance treatment is cost effective compared with acute imipramine treatment for patients with panic disorder. The basic findings and conclusions are not affected after modifying model assumptions for clinical response in patients withdrawing from treatment.     

Neuroleptic discontinuation in the very stable schizophrenic patient: Relapse rates and serum neuroleptic levels

This double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the effect of discontinuation of maintenance neuroleptic medication in chronic, long-stay schizophrenic patients who had been clinically stable for over 5 years. After 12 months, 75 per cent of the patients on placebo had relapsed as compared to 33 per cent on active medication and relapses in the placebo group occurred significantly earlier during the study; survival analysis revealed the differences to be statistically significant. No clear predictors of relapse could be identified, although patients who relapsed from either group were more likely to have had higher scores for anxiety symptoms and a lower serum prolactin level at baseline. It was concluded that even in older patients who have been chronically ill with prominent negative symptoms and living in a relatively undemanding environment on stable doses of neuroleptics, the risk of relapse remains unacceptably high after abrupt withdrawal of maintenance neuroleptic therapy.     

Placebo-controlled continuation treatment with mirtazapine: acute pattern of response predicts relapse.

Pattern of response to antidepressants has been proposed as a method to identify patients whose improvement is more likely due to drug vs those whose improvement on drug is more likely to be a placebo effect. It is hypothesized that those with 'true-drug initial response pattern' are most likely to benefit from continuation treatment. The relationship between acute patterns of response and subsequent placebo-controlled continuation treatment with the antidepressant mirtazapine is examined. A total of 410 outpatients were treated openly with mirtazapine for 8-12 weeks. Patients who remitted in the acute phase were randomized to continue the same dose of mirtazapine or switched to placebo. Acute phase responders were classified as 'placebo initial response pattern' (early responders and nonpersistent responders) and 'true-drug initial response pattern' (delayed and persistent responders). Of those with a 'true-drug initial response pattern,' 10/40 (25.0%) relapsed with continuation mirtazapine, and 23/41 (56.1%) relapsed when switched to placebo. The difference (31.1%) is significant. Of those with a 'placebo initial response pattern,' 5/36 (13.9%) relapsed with continuation mirtazapine, and 12/39 (30.8%) relapsed with placebo substitution. This difference (16.9%) is not statistically significant. Moreover, the relapse rate for 'true-drug initial response pattern' patients switched to placebo (56.1%) was also significantly greater than for 'placebo initial response pattern' patients switched to placebo (30.8%). It has been suggested that patients with late onset and persistence are more likely to have improved because of drug. This hypothesis gains support from this study because of the different relapse rates of 'true-drug' responders on drug and placebo. The low relapse rate for patients with an acute placebo pattern switched to placebo suggests specific drug effect played a smaller role in their initial improvement.     

Continuation treatment of chronic depression: a comparison of nefazodone, cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy, and their combination

Little is known about the relative benefits of psychotherapy, medication, and combined treatment as continuation therapies for chronic forms of major depressive disorder (MDD) after a positive response to acute treatment. We hypothesize that combined treatment would demonstrate superior continuation phase outcomes compared to either monotherapy, as evidenced by lower relapse rates and greater rates of improvement from partial to full remission. We report 16-week continuation phase outcomes for 324 patients who had participated in either the acute phase of a randomized multicenter trial of nefazodone, Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP), or combination therapy (COMB) for chronic forms of MDD. Patients entering the continuation phase had either fully or partially remitted after 12 weeks of acute phase treatment. The primary efficacy measure was the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. For patients in remission at acute phase exit, 73.3% (107/146) maintained their remitted status at endpoint of the continuation phase. Of those having a partial remission at acute phase exit, 52.9% (92/174) achieved full remission by end of continuation. A greater proportion of patients maintained a partial or full remission status on COMB (90%) compared to nefazodone (80%, p=0.011) or to CBASP (82%, p=0.042). These differences reflected greater symptom re-emergence in the partial remission groups on CBASP and nefazodone monotherapy compared to COMB. Continuation treatment assignment was not randomized or blinded. There was no placebo group. Most patients with chronic forms of MDD sustained their acute phase response and more than 50% of partial remitters achieved full remission while continuing treatment with nefazodone, CBASP, or COMB. COMB was associated with less symptom re-emergence during the continuation phase than either monotherapy, particularly for partial remitters.     

Treatment and prevention of relapse of mild oesophagitis with omeprazole and cisapride: comparison of two strategies

Background: Oesophagitis is usually a chronic condition. Healing with omeprazole is often followed by early relapse. Combination treatment and subsequent maintenance treatment with the prokinetic cisapride may be of benefit in relapse prevention. Methods: Patients with endoscopically proven oesophagitis, grade I (n= 120) or grade II (n= 105), were randomized in an open fashion to receive 8 weeks of healing treatment with omeprazole 20 mg daily (OM) followed by 12 months of follow-up without maintenance treatment, or 8 weeks of combined treatment of omeprazole 20 mg daily plus cisapride 5 mg t.d.s. (OMCIS) followed by 12 months of maintenance treatment with cisapride 5 mg t.d.s. (CIS). Only the patients healed after acute treatment were included in the 12-month follow-up study for evaluation of endoscopic relapse. Results: In the group of patients with oesophagitis grade I (n= 58 receiving OM, n= 62 receiving OMCIS), healing rates were comparable for both acute treatment regimens. In the group of patients with grade II (n= 54 receiving OM, n= 51 receiving OMCIS), the healing rates were slightly but not significantly in favour of OMCIS after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. During the 12 months of follow-up, CIS maintenance treatment was associated with a significant reduction of relapse. In the group of patients with initial grade I oesophagitis, the relapse rates after 3 months were 20% in the OMCIS group receiving CIS maintenance treatment, compared to 48 % in the group healed on OM without further maintenance treatment (P= 0.04). After 6 months, these relapse rates were 31% and 85% respectively (P < 0.001), and after 12 months 40% and 96% (P < 0.001). In the group of patients with initial grade II oesophagitis, they were, respectively, 20% vs. 39% after 3 months (P= 0.056), 41% vs. 78% after 6 months (P < 0.001) and 52% vs. 95 % after 12 months (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The results of this open study indicate that continued treatment with cisapride 5 mg t.d.s. (after initial healing with omeprazole 20 mg daily plus cisapride 5 mg t.d.s.) is beneficial in the long-term management of grade I and II oesophagitis : this treatment approach significantly reduces the high relapse rate observed after stopping healing treatment with omeprazole.     

Superiority of clomipramine over imipramine in the treatment of panic disorder: a placebo-controlled trial.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was undertaken to compare the effects of imipramine and clomipramine in the treatment of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. The number of dropouts in the placebo-treated group was 7; in the imipramine-treated group, 4; and in the clomipramine treated group, 0. Ten subjects fulfilled the 12 weeks of treatment in the placebo group, 25 in the imipramine group, and 22 in the clomipramine group. To minimize dropouts because of side effects, a flexible dose regimen with a careful escalation of doses was applied. The maximal dose allowed was 250 mg/day. The mean (+/- SEM) daily doses reached were 124 +/- 9 mg (range, 50-250 mg) of imipramine and 109 +/- 8 mg (range, 25-200 mg) of clomipramine. At the end of the trial, the number of panic attacks as well as the anxiety between attacks (measured using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety) were markedly reduced in patients treated with either of the two antidepressant drugs, but only slightly decreased in patients on placebo. With respect to all major outcome parameters, i.e., full panic attacks, total number of anxiety attacks (full plus mild), and anxiety between attacks, the effect of clomipramine was clearly and significantly superior to that of imipramine (p less than 0.001, p less than 0.002, and p less than 0.002, respectively). Moderate intake of diazepam was allowed; in the clomipramine group (p less than 0.006), but neither in the imipramine group nor in the placebo group, a significant decrement in diazepam intake was observed during the course of the trial. The finding that clomipramine may have a higher potency and/or efficacy than imipramine in the treatment of panic disorder supports the concept that the antipanic effect of antidepressant drugs is due to the influence of these compounds on serotonergic rather than noradrenergic neurotransmission.     

Effects of clonidine on alprazolam discontinuation in panic patients: a pilot study

Effects of adjunctive clonidine (0.15 to 0.7 mg/day) on symptoms experienced during and for 4 weeks after gradual alprazolam discontinuation were observed in panic disorder patients after 6 weeks of successful treatment. Twelve of 14 entered patients were considered to have had a sufficient period of discontinuation (2 weeks) and clonidine administration (1 week) for effects to be assessed adequately. Nine of these 12 patients reached zero dose of alprazolam in 3 to 4 weeks. However, 10 of 12 patients experienced new withdrawal symptoms and 11 of 12 experienced recurrent panic attacks during tapering. Although a greater proportion of patients were successfully discontinued in a shorter time than in a previous nonclonidine trial, clonidine did not appear to have a specific effect on relapse or withdrawal. A placebo-controlled trial is needed to discriminate between possible contributions of clonidine and other factors (e.g., physician attitude, placebo effect of pill taking) to this improved outcome.     

Do benzodiazepines extend the duration of follow‐up treatment in patients with bipolar disorder?

INTRODUCTION: In patients with bipolar disorder, relapse and recurrence from the premature discontinuation of pharmacotherapy are serious clinical problems. Thus, clinicians must make every effort to ensure the sufficient duration of continual treatment even after the remission of acute episodes. Here, we examine whether there is any association between benzodiazepine (BZD) use and the duration of follow-up treatment in patients with bipolar disorder. METHODS: The medical records of 70 bipolar patients hospitalized in a university hospital psychiatry ward were reviewed. Selected demographic and clinical variables, such as extent of BZD use and the total duration of outpatient follow-up treatment, were compared. RESULTS: The duration of maintenance treatment at the outpatient department differed significantly between patients who were or were not given BZDs during admission (571 vs. 179 days) and after discharge (836 vs. 154 days). The variables that differed significantly between patients who received follow-up treatment for 6 or more months and those who did not was the number of days of BZD administration during admission (11 vs. 5 days) and after discharge (280 vs. 7 days), and years of education (11 vs. 13 years). CONCLUSION: In the present study, BZDs are suggested as a possible adjunctive therapy for extending follow-up and thus preventing recurrence in patients with bipolar disorder.     

Fluoxetine treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: an open clinical trial

The selective serotonin reuptake blocker fluoxetine was administered to 49 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder in a 12-week open clinical trial. A minimum adequate trial of at least 8 weeks of treatment was completed by 39 patients. Response rates were 62% (24/39) of adequately treated patients and 49% (24/49) of the whole sample. These uncontrolled findings suggest that fluoxetine is of significant benefit for a substantial proportion of obsessive-compulsive disorder patients. However, controlled trials comparing fluoxetine with placebo and other active agents are needed to confirm this, as are studies aimed to delineate fluoxetine's full dose range, optimal length of treatment and relapse rate following discontinuation.     

Double-blind, placebo-substitution study of nefazodone in the prevention of relapse during continuation treatment of outpatients with major depression

The efficacy of nefazodone in prevention of relapse of depression was evaluated in a 36-week double-blind, placebo-substitution, continuation treatment trial. After 16 weeks of acute, single-blind treatment with nefazodone, 131 patients responding to treatment and in stable remission were randomized in a 36-week double-blind trial to either nefazodone (n = 65) or placebo (n = 66). Patients were defined as having relapsed if they had a total score > or = 18 on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale on two consecutive visits or if they discontinued treatment for lack of efficacy. Relapse rates were significantly lower for patients randomized to continued nefazodone treatment than for patients switched to placebo. Kaplan-Meier estimates of relapse rates 9 months (36 weeks) after the end of acute treatment were 1.8% for nefazodone versus 18.3% for placebo (P = 0.009) by the Hamilton Depression Scale and 17.3% versus 32.8% (P = 0.028) by discontinuation for lack of efficacy. The mean modal dose of nefazodone was 412 mg/day at study endpoint. These results demonstrate the clinical effectiveness of up to 1 year's treatment (16 weeks acute and 36 weeks continuation) with nefazodone in depressed patients. Long-term efficacy of nefazodone was accompanied by a good safety profile without any weight gain and with minimal symptoms of withdrawal upon abrupt discontinuation of treatment.     

Absence of discontinuation symptoms with agomelatine and occurrence of discontinuation symptoms with paroxetine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled discontinuation study

The effects of an abrupt interruption of agomelatine, a new melatonergic/serotonergic antidepressant, were explored in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Paroxetine was used as active control. After 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with agomelatine 25 mg/day or paroxetine 20 mg/day, sustained remitted depressed patients were randomized for 2 weeks, under double-blind conditions, to placebo or to their initial antidepressant treatment. Discontinuation symptoms were assessed at the end of the first and second week of discontinuation with the Discontinuation Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) checklist. One hundred and ninety-two sustained remitted patients were randomized to the 2-week discontinuation period. Patients who discontinued agomelatine did not experience more discontinuation symptoms than those who continued on agomelatine. Patients who discontinued paroxetine for placebo experienced significantly more DESS discontinuation symptoms, during the first week, compared to those who continued with paroxetine (respective mean number of emergent symptoms: 7.3+/-7.1 and 3.5+/-4.1, P<0.001). No significant difference was shown between the continuing and interrupting groups in the second week of discontinuation. By contrast to paroxetine, abrupt cessation of agomelatine is not associated with discontinuation symptoms.