MYC or BCL2 copy number aberration is a strong predictor of outcome in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Patients with DLBCL harboring MYC aberrations concurrent with BCL2 or/and BCL6 aberrations constitute a specific group with extremely poor outcome. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the incidence and prognosis of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 aberrations with DLBCL patients in Chinese population. We applied fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analysis in 246 DLBCL patients. The results showed that patients with MYC or BCL2 copy number aberration (CNA) had significantly worse overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) than negative cases (P < 0.0001). Patients with both MYC and BCL2 CNA had similar outcomes to those with classic double hit lymphoma or protein double expression lymphoma (MYC and BCL2/BCL6 coexpression). By multivariate analysis, MYC CNA, BCL2 CNA and double CNA were the independent worse prognostic factors. In conclusions, patients with MYC or BCL2 CNA constituted a unique group with extremely poor outcome and may require more aggressive treatment regimens.     

Prognostic significance of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 rearrangements in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone plus rituximab

BACKGROUND:

Diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) are a biologically heterogeneous group in which various gene alterations have been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and prognostic impact of BCL2, BCL6, and MYC rearrangements in cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone plus rituximab (R‐CHOP)‐treated DLBCL cases.

METHODS:

Tissue microarrays were constructed from 239 cases of DLBCL, and the expressions of CD10, BCL6, MUM1/IRF4, and BCL2 were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 rearrangements were investigated by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization on tissue microarrays. Survival analysis was constructed from 145 R‐CHOP–treated patients.

RESULTS:

MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 rearrangements were detected in 14 (6%), 36 (15%), and 69 (29%) of 239 DLBCL patients. Double or triple rearrangements were detected in 7 (3%) of 239 DLBCL cases. Of these, 4 had BCL2 and MYC, 2 had BCL6 and MYC, and 1 had BCL2, BCL6, and MYC rearrangements. The prognosis of these cases was extremely poor, with a median survival of 9 months. MYC rearrangement was associated with significantly worse overall survival (P = .01), especially for the cases with GC phenotype (P = .009). BCL6 rearrangement also predicted significantly shorter overall survival (P = .04), especially for the non‐GC phenotype (P = .03). BCL2 rearrangement had no prognostic impact on outcome. International Prognostic Index (P = .004) and MYC rearrangement (P = .009) were independent poor prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS:

Analysis of MYC gene rearrangement along with BCL2 and BCL6 is critical in identifying high‐risk patients with poor prognosis. Cancer 2012. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Clinical significance and prognosis of MYC translocation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Recent studies have suggested that chromosomal aberrations of the MYC gene locus indicate an unfavorable prognosis in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, there have been few reports on MYC translocation in Chinese patients. One hundred and six cases of DLBCLs were analyzed using interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization. Immunophenotyping analysis (CD20, CD3, CD10, Bcl‐6, Mum‐1) was also performed. MYC translocation was identified in 13 (12.3%) out of 106 cases. All MYC⁺ DLBCLs showed a non‐germinal center B‐cell type. MYC⁺ DLBCLs showed significantly poorer overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival, with a median OS and progression‐free survival time of 4.7 and 3.2 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazard model confirmed that MYC⁺ (for OS, Hazards ratio 5.254; 95% CI, 2.354–11.723, p < 0.001) was the strongest independent predictor. DLBCL with MYC translocation is a subgroup of non‐germinal center B‐cell DLBCL with poor outcome. This may be a clinical characteristic that is specific to Chinese patients. Because only a few patients received rituximab, its usefulness could not be assessed. Future studies with larger numbers of patients are required. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma having 8q24/MYC rearrangement in Japan

The prognosis of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) having MYC rearrangement (MYC‐R), including double hit lymphoma (DHL), is poor by standard immunochemotherapy. To evaluate the significance of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) for DLBCL with MYC‐R, we retrospectively analyzed Japanese SCT registry data. In total, 54 patients with DLBCL with MYC‐R were identified from 4336 registered adult DLBCL patients. Detailed clinical and cytogenetic information was obtained for 48 patients. The median age at diagnosis of the 48 patients was 54.5 (range 21–67) years. Twenty‐six (54%) patients had MYC‐R only (single hit), and 22 (46%) had MYC‐R and BCL2, and/or BCL6 rearrangement (double/triple hit). In 12 patients who received auto‐SCT during the first complete response (CR), both the 2‐year overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) rates were 75.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.8%–91.2%). In 20 patients who received auto‐SCT after relapsed or refractory state, the 2‐year OS and PFS rates were 68.2% (95% CI, 41.9%–84.5%) and 59.6% (95% CI, 35.1%–77.4%), respectively. In 17 patients who received allo‐SCT, only 4 patients underwent SCT in CR. The 2‐year OS and PFS rates were 29.4% (95% CI, 10.7%–51.1%) and 17.6% (95% CI, 4.3%–38.3%), respectively. The rate of non‐relapse mortality at 1 year was 41.2% (95% CI, 17.1%–64.0%) in this group. The outcomes of single hit and double or triple hit were not different. These findings suggest that auto‐SCT may be effective for MYC‐R DLBCL, including DHL patients of chemosensitive relapsed or refractory state. Since most patients received allo‐SCT not in CR, the outcome of allo‐SCT was unsatisfactory due to high non‐relapse mortality and early relapse. To clarify the role of allo‐SCT for MYC‐R DLBCL, further accumulation of patients is necessary.     

PD1 and PDL1 expression in primary central nervous system diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma are frequent and expression of PD1 predicts poor survival

Primary central nervous system diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (PCNS‐DLBCL) is a rare and aggressive type of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) whit poorly understood pathogenesis. Finding biomarkers associated with patient survival may be important for understanding its physiopathology and to develop new therapeutic approaches. We investigated 32 PCNS‐DLBCL from immunocompetent patients for BCL2, CMYC, LMO2, and P53 expression and for cytogenetic aberrations of BCL2, BCL6, and MYC genes, all known for their prognostic value in systemic DLBCL (s‐DLBCL). We analyzed PD1 and PDL1 protein expression in both tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumor cells. Finally, we searched for correlation between biological data and clinical course. The PCNS‐DLBCL expressed BCL2, CMYC, LMO2, and P53 at similar frequency than s‐DLBCL but without significant prognostic on survival. None cases harbored aberrations involving BCL2 and MYC gene whereas BCL6 abnormalities were present in 20.7% of cases but without value on survival. Expression of PD1 in TILs and PDL1 in tumor cells was observed at higher rates than in s‐DLBCL (58% and 37%, respectively). The PD1 expression in TILs correlated with PDL1 expression in tumor cells (P = .001). Presence of PD1 positive TILs was associated with poorer overall survival (P = .011). Patients with PDL1 overexpression tended to better response to chemotherapy (P = .23). In conclusion PCNS‐DLBCL pathogenesis differs from s‐DLBCL without prognostic value of the phenotypic and cytogenetic parameters known for their pejorative impact in the latter. The PD1/PDL1 pathway plays a strong role in PCNS‐DLBCL and represents an attractive target for this aggressive lymphoma.     

Double-Hit Large B Cell Lymphoma

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), accounting for approximately 25% of NHL cases. It is a heterogeneous group of diseases. BCL2, BCL6, and MYC are the most frequent mutated genes in DLBCL. Double-hit lymphoma (DHL) is an aggressive form of DLBCL with an unmet treatment need, in which MYC rearrangement is present with either BCL2 or BCL6 rearrangement. Patients typically present with a rapidly growing mass with B symptoms. DHL has been linked to very poor outcomes when treated with RCHOP chemotherapy. Dual-expressor lymphoma is a form of DLBCL with overexpression of MYC and BCL2/BCL6. There is a paucity of prospective trials evaluating the treatment of DHL. Retrospective series suggest that more aggressive treatment regimens such as DA-EPOCH and hyper CVAD may be more efficacious. However, there remains a lack of consensus regarding optimal treatment for DHL. Further clinical trials, including novel agents, are needed for improvement in outcomes.     

Prognostic value of BCL2 and TP53 genetic alterations for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with R-CHOP

Objective:Limited data about the prognostic significance of BCL2 mutations and BCL2 copy number variations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are available. This study aimed to comprehensively describe BCL2 genetic alterations in DLBCL patients, and examine correlation of BCL2, TP53 and other genetic alterations with outcomes in patients treated with R-CHOP.Methods:Probe capture-based high-resolution sequencing was performed on 191 patients diagnosed with de novo DLBCL. MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 protein expressions were detected by immunohistochemistry.Results:The presence of BCL2 alterations significantly correlated with poor progression-free survival (PFS) (5-year PFS: 13.7% vs. 40.8%; P = 0.003) and overall survival (OS) (5-year OS: 34.0% vs. 70.9%; P = 0.036). Importantly, patients who harbored BCL2 gain/amplifications (BCL2^GA/AMP) also had a remarkably inferior 5-year PFS (11.1% vs. 38.3%; P < 0.001) and OS (22.1% vs. 69.6%; P = 0.009). In contrast, neither BCL2 mutations nor BCL2 translocations were significantly prognostic for survival. Multivariable analyses showed that the presence of BCL2 alterations, especially BCL2^GA/AMP, TP53 mutations, and International Prognostic Index (IPI) were significantly associated with inferior PFS and OS. Novel prognostic models for OS were constructed based on 3 risk factors, including BCL2 alterations (Model 1) or BCL2^GA/AMP (Model 2), TP53 mutations, and IPI, to stratify patients into 4 risk groups with different survival outcomes.Conclusions:This study showed that DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP, BCL2 alterations, especially BCL2^GA/AMP and TP53 mutations were significantly associated with inferior outcomes, which were independent of the IPI. The novel prognostic models we proposed predicted outcomes for DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP, but further validation of the prognostic models is still warranted.     

C-MYC and BCL2: Correlation between Protein Over-Expression and Gene Translocation and Impact on Outcome in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Background: Due to lack of availability of gene expression profiling (GEP) for most developing countries andclinicians; the immunohistochemistry (IHC) is mostly used in the clinical application. The aim of our study is to checkthe possibility of using IHC to detect MYC and BCL2 in our patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)instead of GEP to stratify them into high and low-risk groups. This will help in a proper treatment choice of subsequentimprovement in the survival outcome. Method: During the study period, 90 DLBCL patients were eligible. MYC andBCL2 evaluated by IHC and gene rearrangement by real-time PCR (RT-PCR) and correlated with clinical-pathologicalfeatures and survival. Results: Through IHC, the expression of MYC, BCL2, and double expression was detectedin 35.6%, 46.7% and 30% of patients, respectively. While by RT-PCR, it was 4.53±0.74 for MYC compared with2.18±0.78 for BCL-2. Most patients with BCL2+/MYC+; double-expressor and double-hit lymphomas (DEL andDHL) had high stage (III, IV), more extra-nodal involvement, (P value <0.001) and intermediate to high InternationalPrognostic Index (IPI) risk profile (P-value <0.001). The median overall survival was 14 months and 6 months for DELand DHL, respectively. While all patients with DHL died during the follow-up period, the median PFS were only 2months for DEL. There was a statistically significant correlation between mRNA of MYC and BCL2 with their proteinexpression (p<0.001). Conclusion: Our results confirmed the unique characters and poor outcome associated withDEL and DHL mandated the need for more intense therapy and not the standard protocol. Moreover, the significantcorrelation between protein overexpression and gene rearrangement may open the door for the possibility to use IHCinstead of RT-PCR in developing countries.     

Immunohistochemical double-hit score is a strong predictor of outcome in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone

PURPOSE Approximately 5% of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) are double-hit lymphomas (DHLs) with translocations of both MYC and BCL2. DHLs are characterized by poor outcome. We tested whether DLBCLs with high expression of MYC protein and BCL2 protein share the clinical features and poor prognosis of DHLs. PATIENTS AND METHODS Paraffin-embedded lymphoma samples from 193 patients with de novo DLBCL who were uniformly treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) were studied using immunohistochemistry for MYC, BCL2, CD10, BCL6, and MUM1/interferon regulatory factor 4, and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC and BCL2. Results FISH analysis identified DHL in 6% of patients, who showed the expected poor overall survival (OS; P = .002). On the basis of immunohistochemical MYC and BCL2 expression, a double-hit score (DHS) was assigned to all patients with DLBCL. The DHS-2 group, defined by high expression of both MYC and BCL2 protein, comprised 29% of the patients. DHS 2 was significantly associated with lower complete response rate (P = .004), shorter OS (P < .001), and shorter progression-free survival (PFS; P < .001). The highly significant correlation with OS and PFS was maintained in multivariate models that controlled for the International Prognostic Index and the cell-of-origin subtype (OS, P < .001; PFS, P < .001). DHS was validated in an independent cohort of 116 patients who were treated with R-CHOP. CONCLUSION The immunohistochemical DHS defined a large subset of DLBCLs with double-hit biology and was strongly associated with poor outcome in patients treated with R-CHOP.     

PD‐L1 expression is low in large B‐cell lymphoma with MYC or double‐hit translocation

In large B‐cell lymphoma (LBCL), MYC translocation and MYC/BCL2 or MYC/BCL6 double hit (DH) are associated with poor prognosis, and there is an unmet need for novel treatment targets in this patient group. Treatments targeting the PD‐L1/PD‐1 pathway are still poorly elucidated in LBCL. PD‐L1 expression might predict response to treatment targeting the PD‐L1/PD‐1 pathway. We therefore investigated the relationship between PD‐L1 protein and mRNA expression levels and MYC and DH translocation in LBCL. We detected MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 translocation by fluorescent in situ hybridization in tissue samples from 130 patients randomly selected from two cohorts of patients with LBCL: 49 patients with MYC translocation of whom 36 had DH and 81 without MYC translocation. PD‐L1 protein expression was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tissue samples from 77 patients and PD‐L1 mRNA expression by next‐generation RNA sequencing (NGS) in another 77 patients. Twenty‐four patients overlapped, ie, were analysed with both IHC and NGS. Nonparametric tests were performed to evaluate intergroup differences. PD‐L1 protein expression level was significantly lower in patients with MYC (n = 42, median = 3.3%, interquartile range [IQR] 0.0‐10.8) or DH translocations (n = 31, median = 3.3%, IQR 0.0‐10.0) compared with patients with no MYC (n = 35, median = 16.7%, IQR 3.3‐30.0) or no DH translocations (n = 46, 13.3%, IQR 2.5‐30.0), P = .004 and P ≤ .001, respectively. PD‐L1 mRNA expression was also significantly lower in patients with MYC or DH translocations, P = .001 and P = .006, respectively. Higher PD‐L1 protein and mRNA expression levels were associated with non–germinal centre (GC) type compared with germinal centre B‐cell (GCB)‐type diffuse LBCL (DLBCL), P = .004 and P = .002, respectively. In conclusion, we report an association between low PD‐L1 expression and MYC and DH translocation in patients with LBCL. Our findings may indicate that patients with MYC or DH translocation may benefit less from treatment with PD‐L1/PD‐1‐inhibitors compared with patients without these translocations. This should be evaluated in larger, prospective, consecutive trials.     

Prognostic Significance of BCL-2 and BCL-6 Expression in MYC-positive DLBCL

Background

Double-expression lymphoma (DEL) is a rare subgroup of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), which has coexpression of MYC and BCL-2. Coexpression of MYC and BCL-2 is considered a prognostic marker portending poor outcomes. However, the prognostic effect of BCL-2 and BCL-6 expression in DLBCL remains controversial.

High incidence of MYC and BCL2 abnormalities in mantle cell lymphoma,although only MYC abnormality predicts poor survival

The incidence and prognostic role of MYC and BCL2 rearrangements in mature B-cell lymphomas have been extensively studied, except the infrequent mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Here, we analyzed the MYC and BCL2 abnormalities and other cytogenetic aberrations by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 50 MCL patients with bone marrow involvement. Eighteen patients (36.0%) had MYC gains and/or amplifications, and twelve patients (24.0%) had BCL2 gains and/or amplifications. Among the 18 patients with MYC abnormality, four had simultaneous MYC translocations, but no BCL2 translocation was detected among patients with BCL2 abnormality. Only two patients (4.0%) had both MYC and BCL2 abnormalities. The patients with a MYC abnormality had a significantly higher tumor burden, a higher percentage of medium/high risk MIPI group and genomic instability compared to those without this abnormality. However, no significant difference was observed between patients with or without a BCL2 abnormality in terms of clinical and cytogenetic factors. Patients with a MYC abnormality had poorer progress-free survival (PFS) (9.0 vs. 48.0 months, p = .000) and overall survival (OS) (12.0 vs. 94.5 months, p = .000), but the presence of a BCL2 abnormality did not significantly influence either PFS or OS. In multivariate analysis, the MYC abnormality was the independent adverse factor for both PFS and OS, and intensive chemotherapy did not improve the outcome of these patients. Thus, the presence of a MYC but not BCL2 abnormality predicted the poor survival of MCL patients, and a new treatment strategy should be developed for these patients.     

CD5 expression is potentially predictive of poor outcome among biomarkers in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma receiving rituximab plus CHOP therapy

BackgroundSeveral biomarkers indicating poor prognosis have been reassessed in patients receiving rituximab combination chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, few studies have investigated outcome in relation to a combination of these biomarkers. In addition, no large-scale studies have reassessed the outcome of patients with CD5-positive DLBCL treated with rituximab.Patients and methodsWe conducted a retrospective study and investigated the predictive value of three biomarkers—BCL2, germinal center (GC) phenotype and CD5—in 121 DLBCL patients treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone.ResultsCD5-positive patients showed significantly poorer event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) than CD5-negative patients (2-year EFS, 18% versus 73%, P < 0.001; 2-year OS, 45% versus 91%, P = 0.001). However, no significant difference in outcome according to BCL2 or GC phenotype was observed. Multivariate analysis revealed that CD5 expression was a significant prognostic factor for EFS [hazard ratio 14.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.7–43.2] and OS (hazard ratio 20.3, 95% CI 3.6–114.4).ConclusionsCD5 expression was the only significant prognostic factor among the biomarkers examined in this study. Further studies with larger numbers are warranted to confirm the prognostic significance of CD5 expression for patients with DLBCL receiving rituximab-containing chemotherapy.     

MYC protein expression is associated with poor prognosis in diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients treated with RCHOP chemotherapy

This study aims to investigate the prognostic significance of the MYC protein expression in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated with RCHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). A total of 60 patients with DLBCL from 2008 to 2013 were included. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded DLBCL samples were analyzed for MYC protein expression and divided into high or low MYC group. The MYC protein expression and the international prognostic variables were evaluated. The high MYC protein expression predicted a shorter 3-year estimated overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus the low MYC protein expression (57 % vs. 96 %, P?<?0.001 and 50 % vs. 96 %, P?=?0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed the prognostic significance of the MYC protein expression for both OS (HR, 11.862; 95 % CI, 1.462–96.218; P?=?0.021) and PFS (HR, 6.073; 95 % CI, 1.082–34.085; P?=?0.040). MYC protein expression with International Prognostic Index (IPI) score distinguished patients into three risk groups with different 3-year OS rates (χ ² 23.079; P?<?0.001) and distinct 3-year PFS rates (χ ² 15.862; P?<?0.001). This study suggests that the MYC protein expression is an important inferior prognostic factor for survival in patients with DLBCL treated with RCHOP. The combinative model with IPI score and MYC protein expression could stratify DLBCL patients into prognostically relevant subgroups more effectively than either the IPI or the MYC alone.     

Combination of CD47 and signal‐regulatory protein‐α constituting the “don’t eat me signal” is a prognostic factor in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

The interaction between CD47 and signal‐regulatory protein‐α (SIRPα) inhibits phagocytosis, thus affecting the clinical outcomes of neoplastic diseases. Although CD47 upregulation is associated with poor prognosis in several malignancies, the effect of SIRPα expression and its coexpression with CD47 remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathologic effect of CD47 and SIRPα expression in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Immunostaining of 120 biopsy samples showed that CD47 is primarily expressed in tumor cells, whereas SIRPα is expressed in nonneoplastic stromal cells, mostly macrophages. CD47^high cases showed higher MYC protein expression and lower MYC translocation. The SIRPα^high cases presented significantly shorter overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) than SIRPα^low cases in the activated B‐cell (ABC) subtype of DLBCL (P = .04 and P = .02, respectively). Both CD47^high and SIRPα^high presented significantly shorter OS and PFS than other cases among all DLBCL patients (P = .01 and P = .004, respectively), and the ABC type (P = .04 and P = .008, respectively) but not the germinal center B‐cell type. Both CD47^high and SIRPα^high yielded a constant independent prognostic value for OS and PFS in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20‐7.43; P = .02; and HR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.42‐5.85; P = .003, respectively). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report that combinatorial CD47 and SIRPα expression is a potential independent prognostic factor for DLBCL. Evaluation of CD47 and SIRPα expression could be useful before CD47 blockade therapy.     

Impact of Double Expression of C-MYC/BCL2 Protein and Cell of Origin Subtypes on the Outcome among Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: a Single Asian Center Experience

Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with double expression of c-MYC and BCL2 protein isassociated with dismal outcome after treatment with R-CHOP. Local data on disease burden and survival outcome inDLBCL is limited. We investigated the prognostic values of c-MYC/BCL2 protein co-expression and cell of originsubtypes using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and to determine their associations with multiethnic groups underresource limited setting. Methods: This was a retrospective study which recruited 104 patients in between June 2012and December 2015 for IHC review and analysis. Result: We demonstrated that patients with high InternationalPrognostic Index (IPI) (score 3-5) and co-expression of c-MYC/BCL2 protein had significant inferior overall survival(OS) and event free survival (EFS) respectively (P<0.05). c-MYC/BCL2 protein co-expression was more common innon-germinal center B-cell (non-GCB) (P=0.048) and contributed to adverse prognosis in this group of patients (OS,P=0.004; EFS, P=0.005). In multivariate analysis, double-protein co-expression was a significant independent predictorof inferior outcome after adjusted for IPI and cell of origin subtypes (OS hazard ratio [HR], 2.11; 95% CI, 1.01 to 4.04;P=0.048; EFS HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.05 to 5.04; P=0.036). In addition, non-GCB subtype was more common than GCBin Malays (60% vs 40%, P=0.106) and Chinese (81.2% vs 18.8%, P=0.042). Indians had more DLBCL without c-MYC/BCL2 protein co-expression compared to double-protein positive cases (66.7% vs 33.3%, P=0.414). Otherwise, theprognostic impact of ethnicity on survival outcome was insignificant (P=0.961). Conclusion: c-MYC/BCL2 proteinco-expression in non-GCB subtype constituted a unique group with extremely inferior outcome regardless of ethnicity.Gene expression profile (GEP) may possibly provide insights into the cause of discrepancies in DLBCL subtypes andprotein expression among the multiethnic groups.     

Cytopathology of "double-hit" non-Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND:

B‐cell lymphomas with concurrent IGH‐BCL2 and c‐MYC rearrangements (so‐called “double‐hit lymphomas” [DHL]) are a relatively rare, recently described category in the 2008 World Health Organization classification of hematopoietic neoplasms. Response to chemotherapy and survival are poor.

METHODS:

The authors reviewed files of cytogenetically documented DHL to identify cytologic features that would allow its possible recognition.

RESULTS:

Twelve fine‐needle aspirates (FNAs), 2 pleural fluids, and 1 touch imprint of cytogenetically proven DHL were uncovered. Primary DHL was correctly recognized in 3 of 12 FNA cases using Ki‐67 staining coupled with a positive bcl‐2 result as the basis for performing fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of c‐MYC and IGH‐BCL2 rearrangements. Remaining FNAs and non‐FNA cases were diagnosed as non‐Hodgkin lymphoma, B‐cell lymphoma, or atypical lymphocytosis. Ten cases had cell block material available. All cases had high cellularity with a dissociated smear pattern and background lymphoglandular bodies. Cell size ranged from intermediate to large. Nuclei were predominantly rounded or slightly irregular in contour; 4 FNAs had markedly cleaved nuclei. Some nuclei harbored discrete but small nucleoli, whereas in others coarse chromatin and indistinct or multiple small nucleoli existed. A variable number of mitotic figures, tingible body macrophages, and background apoptotic cells were also present.

CONCLUSIONS:

No specific cytomorphologic feature(s) were found to reliably identify DHL using FNA or exfoliative cytology. A high Ki‐67 proliferation index and positive bcl‐2 staining (on cytospin slides or cell block material) of cases not conforming to typical Burkitt lymphoma morphology should prompt FISH analysis for c‐MYC and/or IGH‐BCL2 rearrangements to identify DHL, particularly if tissue biopsy is not expected. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society     

Dysregulated CXCR4 expression promotes lymphoma cell survival and independently predicts disease progression in germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Abnormal expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 plays an essential role in tumor cell dissemination and disease progression. However, the significance of CXCR4 overexpression in de novo diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is unknown. In 743 patients with de novo diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who received standard Rituximab-CHOP immunochemotherapy, we assessed the expression of CXCR4 and dissected its prognostic significance in various DLBCL subsets. Our results showed that CXCR4⁺ patients was associated with male, bulky tumor, high Ki-67 index, activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtype, and Myc, Bcl-2 or p53 overexpression. Moreover, CXCR4⁺ was an independent factor predicting poorer progression-free survival in germinal-center B-cell-like (GCB)-DLBCL, but not in ABC-DLBCL; and in patients with an IPI of ≤2, but not in those with an IPI>2. The lack of prognostic significance of CXCR4 in ABC-DLBCL was likely due to the activation of p53 tumor suppressor attenuating CXCR4 signaling. Furthermore, concurrent CXCR4⁺ and BCL2 translocation showed dismal outcomes resembling but independent of MYC/BCL2 double-hit DLBCL. Gene expression profiling suggested that alterations in the tumor microenvironment and immune responses, increased tumor proliferation and survival, and the dissemination of CXCR4⁺ tumor cells to distant organs or tissues were underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for the CXCR4⁺ associated poor prognosis.