Antibodies against hepatitis C virus in hemodialysis patients in the central Italian region of Umbria: evaluation of some risk factors.

The epidemiology of non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH) is still incomplete. To define the prevalence of antibodies against the main causative agent of NANBH, the hepatitis C virus (HCV) and the role of some risk factors, we tested sera from 269 patients on chronic dialysis at the hemodialysis units in our region in central Italy. We utilized the recently developed serological assay. Twenty-nine hemodialysis patients (13.3%) and 3 peritoneal dialysis patients (4.8%) were anti-HCV positive. Of these, 13 (40.6%) had antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) indicating prior hepatitis B infection. The anti-HCV seropositive patients had been on dialysis longer than the seronegative ones; they had received more transfusions than the others but without a significant difference. The prevalence rate of anti-HCV was statistically significantly higher among hemodialysis patients utilizing the same dialysis equipment for the previous 12 months.     

Prevalence of non-A non-B hepatitis and anti-HCV antibodies in a Portuguese dialysis population.

Non-A Non-B hepatitis (NANBH) is nowadays one of the most common causes of hepatic dysfunction in dialysis patients. We reviewed the records of 231 HBsAg-negative patients in our unit and found 119 patients with biochemical criteria of NANBH (51.5%), 88 of them (68.9%) with circulating antibodies against HCV (chi 2 P less than 0.0001). Such high prevalence of NANBH was due to an outbreak of NANBH in the late 70s and early 80s. Time on haemodialysis (HD) was the major risk factor of NANBH in this population, and no other risk factors were identified. Prevalence of anti-HCV was similar to reports from non-uraemic populations. Anti-HCV seems to be a reliable test to confirm NANBH, but not better than using common biochemical criteria of NANBH to manage these patients in dialysis units.     

Hepatitis C virus antibodies in patients with liver disease. The western Cape experience.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a recently characterised non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH) agent, which appears to be important in both parenteral and sporadic NANBH. HCV infection has been associated with the development of chronic liver disease, cirrhosis and hepatoma. Groups of patients in the western Cape with chronic liver disease and hepatoma were screened for antibodies to HCV and the results were confirmed by standard neutralisation tests. Three of 19 patients with cirrhosis secondary to alcohol abuse or classic auto-immune chronic active hepatitis were considered to have antibodies to HCV at initial screening. All of these were false-positive results. Five of 20 patients with presumptive chronic NANBH were considered possibly to have antibodies to HCV. Only 1 patient with post-transfusional NANBH was confirmed to have specific HCV antibodies. Two of 30 patients with hepatoma had specific anti-HCV antibodies in contrast to 11 others with serum HBsAg positivity. One hundred blood transfusion donors and 25 antenatal patients were tested concurrently and shown to be negative for anti-HCV. Specific antibodies to HCV were present in very few patients with cirrhosis, presumptive NANBH and hepatoma tested in this local survey. False-positive reactions appeared to occur at a higher rate than true-positive results.     

Outbreak of hemodialysis-associated non-A, non-B hepatitis and correlation with antibody to hepatitis C virus.

Between January 1987 and October 1988, 35 (45%) of 77 patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis at one unit developed serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations suggestive of non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH). Patients were grouped by level of ALT elevation and presence of other etiologies for liver injury. All dialysis patients and staff were tested for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) by enzyme immunoassay on three occasions, 9 months apart; anti-HCV repeatedly reactive specimens were tested by the HCV neutralization assay. Household and sexual contacts of patients were tested once for anti-HCV. Case-patients were classified on the basis of clinical case definitions as probable, possible, questionable, and noncases, and by anti-HCV testing. Case-patients who had no history of transfusions or parenteral drug use were compared with noncases for common exposures. A total of 35% (27/77) of patients and none (0/24) of staff were anti-HCV-positive. Anti-HCV was found in 82% of probable cases, compared with 44% of possible cases, 44% of questionable cases, and 12% of noncases (P less than 0.01). Neither a common source nor direct person-to-person transmission could be documented; however, inadequate infection control measures demonstrated by lack of glove use and poor handwashing occurred during the exposure period. The incidence of HCV infection in patients over an 18-month period was 5%. Transmission of HCV to household or sexual contacts of patients did not appear to occur.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Retrospective study on the prevalence of B and non-A, non-B hepatitis in a dialysis unit: 17-year follow-up.

To evaluate the prevalence of HBV, non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH) and HCV, their evolution and the route of transmission, we performed a retrospective study (17 years) on 65 hemodialyzed patients (mean dialytical age 5 years, range 1-16) who developed acute viral hepatitis. Twenty-six percent of them were affected by HBV; 5 of them (29%) became chronic. Fourty-eight of 65 patients were affected by NANBH; in 1990, 42 of them were tested for antibody to HCV with the C-100 Elisa assay: 27 patients (64%) were positive. Seven of 27 patients demonstrated normal values of ALT. The evaluation of intrafamiliar transmission of HBV showed 8 sexual partners infected. In the family, no one was anti-HCV positive. In agreement with the current literature, we have observed: (1) a decrement in HBV infection; (2) that HCV is the major cause of NANBH; its rate of chronicity is over 50%; (3) that the prevalent mode of HCV transmission is the parenteral route while the sexual route seems to be negligible.     

Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Dialysis: A Continuing Problem

Patients on chronic dialysis are at increased risk of acquiring parenterally transmitted hepatitis viruses from blood product transfusions or nosocomial transmission in hemodialysis units, and biochemical abnormalities in liver function are seen in 10–44% of patients on chronic hemodialysis. In the past, hepatitis B virus (HBV) was the major cause of parenterally transmitted viral hepatitis in dialysis patients, and the remaining cases were attributed to non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH). The discovery of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has shed light on the cause and clinical course of NANBH in patients on dialysis. The current debate is focused on strategies to reduce the transmission of HCV among dialysis patients and to lessen the consequences of liver disease among patients already infected.     

Abnormal alanine aminotransferase activity reflects exposure to hepatitis C virus in haemodialysis patients.

Prospective studies have shown that the annual incidence of non-A, non-B (NANB) hepatitis may be high in haemodialysis patients. To assess whether hepatitis C virus (HCV), the major causative agent of post-transfusion and community-acquired NANB hepatitis, has a role in the pathogenesis of liver disease in dialysed patients, we have studied the prevalence and significance of antibodies to HCV in a cohort of patients with end-stage renal disease on chronic haemodialysis treatment. Seventy-four (30%) had circulating antibodies to HCV. Statistically significant associations with the anti-HCV carrier status were duration of haemodialysis treatment, blood transfusions, and the finding of abnormally elevated ALT on retrospective analysis. In contrast, only one of 103 dialysis staff members showed transient positivity for anti-HCV, suggesting a low risk of professional exposure to HCV. These findings suggests that HCV infection is relatively frequent in haemodialysis patients and may be responsible for a significant proportion of liver disease in this clinical setting.     

Hepatitis C in renal transplant recipients

Sera from 130 renal transplant recipients were tested for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV). Anti-HCV was detected in 6.2% of patients: 15.4% of patients who had maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and 2.2% of those who had continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) before transplantation (P less than 0.05). The similarity in prevalence of anti-HCV with patients currently on dialysis and the absence of transfusion during posttransplant follow-up suggest that most patients acquired HCV infection through transfusion during dialysis. The proportion of anti-HCV-positive patients who had one or more episodes of elevation in serum transaminase level was similar to that of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients, 75% vs. 72.2%. However, anti-HCV was only detected in 25% of HBsAg-negative patients who had recurrent elevations in serum transaminase level. It is not clear whether the low prevalence of anti-HCV in these patients is related to the presence of other non-A, non-B hepatitis virus (es) or a decrease in titer of anti-HCV secondary to immunosuppression posttransplantation.     

Infection of hepatitis C virus in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis therapy and staff members]

The prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was determined in 564 patients and 145 staff members of nine hemodialysis (HD) units in Nagano Prefecture using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on the C 100 HCV antigen (the first generation anti-HCV assay). And also serum HBV markers were tested in these subjects. One hundred patients (18%) were anti-C100 HCV positive, indicating that this figure represents a much higher prevalence than that (0.9%) among general population in the same geographical area. Out of 141 patients without history of blood transfusion, 17 (12%) were positive for anti-C 100 HCV, suggesting that blood-transfusions-unrelated acquisition of HCV infection can occur. Anti-HCV prevalence correlated with both the blood units transfused and the duration of HD treatment. There was a significant difference in the prevalence of anti-C 100 HCV in individual dialysis units ranging from 0% to 53%. In the dialysis unit with prevalence of 53%, approximately half of the anti-HCV positive patients were found to have chronic liver disease. The prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) markers among HD patients, on the other hand, was 36% (202/564). Fifty one (51%) of 100 anti-C 100 HCV positive patients and 151 (33%) of 464 anti-C 100 HCV negative patients were positive for HBV markers, with significant difference in HBV infection rate between the 2 groups. The prevalence of chronic liver disease, defined as abnormal serum transaminase levels for more than 6 months was significantly higher in anti-HCV positive patients than in anti-HCV negative ones (39% vs 10%, p less than 0.05), suggesting that HCV infection may contribute to chronic liver disease in HD patients. Among 145 staff members, only 3 (2%) were positive for anti-HCV, whereas 25 (17%) were positive for hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), indicating prior HBV infection. With applying the second generation anti-HCV assay, which can detect antibodies to both capsid and nonstructural products of HCV gene, anti-HCV prevalence increased by two times in HD patients, but didn't change in HD staff members.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Influence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) viraemia upon serum aminotransferase activity in chronic dialysis patients

BACKGROUND: There are many reports concerning HCV in dialysis patients and most of them conclude that the clinical and biochemical features of hepatitis C are often silent in chronic dialysis patients. Elevated levels of serum alanine aminotransferase activity are a sensitive measure of hepatocellular injury, but so far the relationship between anti-HCV and ALT among chronic dialysis patients has been considered imperfect. To our knowledge, however, such an issue has not been adequately addressed. METHODS: Demographic, biochemical, and virological data from 506 patients undergoing chronic dialysis treatment in four dialysis units in Lombardy, northern Italy were collected in order to assess the influence of virological and host factors on serum aminotransferase values. RESULTS: Analysis of covariance showed that positivity for anti-HCV antibody was significantly associated with raised serum AST (P = 0.0001) and ALT (P = 0.0001) levels in the dialysis patients of the whole study group. Logistic regression analysis performed in the subset of patients tested for HCV viraemia and genotype showed that detectable HCV RNA in serum is a strong predictor of raised AST (P = 0.0001) and ALT (P = 0.000001) values. Gender showed an independent weak influence on AST levels (P = 0.055), serum levels of ferritin were significantly (P = 0.042) associated with AST values, the coexistence of HBsAg infection and positivity for anti-HCV antibody was independently associated with raised ALT levels (P = 0.016). The other factors (including positivity for anti-HCV) showed no independent effect on serum aminotransferase levels when they were matched with HCV viraemia in our multivariate analysis. HCV RNA positive patients showed serum AST (P < 0.008) and ALT levels (P < 0.0001) higher than HCV RNA negative patients. There was no relationship between HCV genotypes and liver enzymes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that detectable HCV RNA in serum is a strong independent predictor of raised aminotransferase values in chronic dialysis patients; the relationship between serum aminotransferase values and anti-HCV antibody was exclusively related to the association between raised aminotransferase values and HCV viraemia; HCV RNA positive patients show higher hepatic enzyme levels than dialysis patients with no detectable HCV RNA; no association between HCV genotype and serum aminotransferase activity was apparent.      

Seroprevalence of hepatitis C virus and hepatitis B virus among dialysis patients in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia

Dialysis patients are at risk for contracting blood-borne infections, including hepatitis viruses (HBV and HCV). The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of HBV and HCV infection among hamodialysis patients in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia. Study subjects comprised 81 Bahraini and 34 Saudi dialysis patients, and as control 7714 Bahraini and 2330 Saudi blood donors. Serologic markers of HBV (HBsAg, anti-HBc) and HCV (anti-HCV) were determined by EIA and confirmed by PCR (HBV) and RT-PCR (HCV). Higher prevalence of HCV (9.240% vs 0.300%, P <.001), HBsAg (5.88% vs 0.620%; P <.001), but not anti-HBc (1.7% vs 4.6%; P =.01) were seen in patients compared to controls, respectively. When compared to Bahrainis, higher prevalence of HBsAg (11.8% vs 3.7%) and anti-HCV (14.7% vs 7.4%) were seen among Saudi patients, respectively. Double HCV infection was frequent, and the most prevalent types were HCV1a/1b plus HCV4 in Bahraini, and HCV 2/2a plus HCV 4 among Saudi dialysis patients. Our results are the first report on viral hepatitis among dialysis patients in Bahrain, and the first to compare HBV/HCV rates among dialysis patients in the Eastern Arabian peninsula, and confirms other results that documented increased HBV and HCV infection among dialysis patients. Future studies aimed at assessing the status and to monitor the progress of viral hepatitis infection among dialyzed and transfused patients will have a strong impact on patient diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment.     

血液透析患者丙型肝炎病毒标志检测

研究血透患者的丙型肝炎病毒感染。方法 在60倒尿毒症血透患者中,采用第二代酶联免疫法测定抗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)抗体,同时采用套式多聚酶联反应(PCR)法测定HCV-RNA。结果 27例抗HCV-HgG阳性,24例抗HCV-IgM阳性,37例HCV-RNA阳性,总阳性率为63.3％;输血组的HCV感染率为69.6％,而非输血组HCV感染率仍高达42.9％;透析时间大于3年者,HCV的感染率达100％。结论 血透患者HCV感染是相当严重的,其中输血为HCV传染的主要途径,但可能还存在经透析装置等其它传播途径。     

Lower erythropoietin and iron supplementation are required in hemodialysis patients with hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a common infectious agent in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients. In this prospective case-control study, we aimed to investigate the influence of chronic HCV infection on erythropoietin (EPO) and iron requirement in HD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 49 HD patients (24 male, 25 female, mean age 47 +/- 15 years) were included. The mean time spent on dialysis was 39 +/- 38 months, and follow-up time was 1 year for this study. Biochemical analyses and complete blood counts together with iron status of the patients (transferrin saturation and serum ferritin levels) were measured monthly. Highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were measured within 3-month intervals. Endogenous EPO levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunoassay 2 weeks after cessation of EPO treatment. RESULTS: Eleven of the HD patients (22%) were anti-HCV(+). There was no difference in age, sex, time on dialysis, distribution of primary renal diseases, predialytic BUN, Kt/V, albumin and i-PTH levels between HCV(+) and (-) patients. Anti-HCV-positive patients required significantly lower weekly doses of EPO (87 +/- 25 IU/kg vs 129 +/- 11 IU/kg, p = 0.042) and iron (16.8 +/- 12.2 mg vs 32.6 +/- 16.1 mg, p = 0.02) replacement than anti-HCV(-) group; hs-CRP levels were similar between study groups. Serum endogenous EPO levels were significantly higher in HCV(+) patients than HCV(-) HD patients (9.43 +/- 6.47 mU/ml vs 3.59 +/- 2.08 mU/ml, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Anti-HCV(+) HD patients had higher serum EPO levels and required less EPO and iron replacement as compared to anti-HCV(-) patients. Because of the changes in iron metabolism, iron treatment should be carefully administered in HD patients with HCV.     

Occult HBV Infection in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis Patients

Aim. Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection can be defined as the presence of HBV DNA in the liver and/or blood in the absence of detectable serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag). There is a high prevalence of occult HBV infection in dialysis patients. This study investigated the prevalence of occult HBV infection in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients and compared the prevalence of occult HBV infection in dialysis patients either with or without hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.?Methods.?In this cross-sectional study, 71 CAPD patients and 71 HD patients were evaluated. HBV DNA testing was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We recorded general characteristics of the patients, duration of dialysis, HBs Ag, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), anti-HCV antibody (anti-HCV), HCV RNA, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase levels (AST).?Results.?Twelve (16.9%) of the 71 HD patients and seven (9.8%) of the 71 CAPD patients were HBV DNA-positive. A statistically significant difference was not observed in the groups. Anti-HCV was negative and AST and ALT levels were normal in all of the HBV-DNA positive patients. Viral loads were low in both groups. Conclusion. This is the first study that analyzes occult HBV prevalence in CAPD patients. We conclude that the prevalence of the occult HBV may be common in CAPD patients as in HD patients, and HCV positivity is not a contributing factor to occult HBV infection in dialysis patients.     

Risk of liver disease in HCV-seropositive kidney transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: This study determined whether renal allograft recipients with antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) at the time of transplantation experienced increased morbidity or mortality from hepatitis, liver disease, or hepatocellular carcinoma compared with patients without anti-HCV. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic liver disease is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation and the contribution of HCV to this problem has not been determined. The recent characterization of the HCV genome has resulted in the development of screening tests for antibody to HCV, allowing the identification of end-stage renal disease patients with anti-HCV who are candidates for transplantation. The risk to these patients for the development of hepatic complications after subsequent transplantation is unknown. METHODS: Archived sera obtained from 163 kidney transplant recipients at the time of transplantation were tested for anti-HCV using the Abbott HCV 2.0 second-generation test system. Sera containing anti-HCV were further analyzed for reactivity against specific HCV recombinant proteins, including core, NS3 (c33c), and NS4 (c100-3), to determine whether a pattern could be identified in patients with hepatic complications. The follow-up of all patients was current (mean length of follow-up was 33 months) to identify patients with hepatic complications. All patients had previously been tested for HBSAg. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (18%) had anti-HCV and three (1.8%) had HBSAg. Forty-five patients (28% of total) had transient elevations of AST or ALT without subsequent evidence of liver disease. Three patients had a syndrome of acute hepatitis. Chronic liver disease developed in only six patients (3.6%) after transplantation. Four had anti-HCV only, one had HBSAg only, and one was positive for both. However, of the 29 patients with anti-HCV, chronic liver disease developed in 5 (17%), including 1 patient who was positive for HBSAg. No patient had hepatocellular carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Perturbations of liver function were common in the kidney transplant recipients studied, most were self-limited, and few were associated with evidence of viral hepatitis. The risk of developing     

Liver disease in dialysis patients with antibodies to hepatitis C virus

Eighty-three patients with chronic end-stage renal failure,including 65 on haemodialysis and 18 on intermittent peritonealdialysis, were evaluated for hepatitis B virus profile and antibodiesto hepatitis C virus (HCV). All those positive for HBsAg wereexcluded from the study. Nineteen patients were found to bepositive for antibodies to HCV by the ELISA II test. Eight caseswere already positive for HCV antibody when they started dialysisin our unit, the other 11 became positive during dialysis inour unit. Only one of the patients on peritoneal dialysis waspositive for HCV. A liver biopsy was obtained from 17 patients,who consented to the procedure. All the cases were evaluatedfor the number of blood transfusions received, HIV infectionand the approximate time of contracting the HCV infection. Liverenzymes were determined every month. Only three patients hadabnormally raised serum aminotransferase at the time of biopsy.The various histopathological lesions detected were chronicactive hepatitis (n=3, including one with changes consistentwith cirrhosis), chronic persistent hepatitis (n = 4), non-specifichepatitis (n = 3) and haemosiderosis (n=3); four biopsy sampleswere normal. There was no correlation between the biochemicaland histopathological changes. Moreover, patients with normalserum aminotransferase levels had abnormal histopathologicalchanges. All were negative for HIV and none of the patientshad received a renal graft. Twelve patients had received bloodtransfusions varying from 2 to 12 units, four had not receivedany blood, and in one the history of blood transfusion couldnot be confirmed. The four patients with anti-HCV antibodieswho had not received blood transfusion had relatively mild disease-non-specifichepatitis (n=2) or normal biopsy (n=2). One patient with cirrhosis died 30 months after liver biopsyfrom hepatic insufficiency and three received renal transplants.Others are continuing on dialysis and their biochemical testsare within normal limits 12–45 (30± 14) monthsafter biopsy. In conclusion, biochemical tests are poor indicators of liverdisease, and liver biopsy is a definitive way of evaluatingthe patients of dialysis with positive HCV antibodies for prognosis.     

Prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in haemodialysis patients

The prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B exposure and antibodies against the hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was assessed in 86 haemodialysis patients at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute (NKTI) using the commercial radioimmunoassay and ortho HCV ELISA assay. Of the 86 patients included in the study, 42 were male with a mean age of 44.9 years and a mean duration of dialysis of 2.4 years. Forty-four were female with a mean age of 48.4 years and a mean duration of dialysis of 2.3 years. Hepatitis B exposure was 57% and 12.8% of haemodialysis patients were positive for HBsAg, whereas 39.8% of patients were positive for anti-HCV. There was a significant correlation ( P =0.00007) between anti-HCV positivity and the length of time on haemodialysis. However, there was no significant correlation found between the number of blood transfusions received and anti-HCV positivity. There was also no significant correlation found between HBsAg and antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) positivity and the number of blood transfusions or the length of time on haemodialysis, nor between hepatitis B and C exposure and elevated aminotransferase levels.     

Hepatitis C infection among dialysis patients: a comparison between patients on maintenance haemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Three hundred and thirty-nine dialysis patients from two centres (278 patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and 61 on maintenance haemodialysis (HD) were tested for antibody against hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) using first-generation enzyme immunoassay kits (Ortho Diagnostics). Anti-HCV was detected in five (1.8%) CAPD patients and ten (16.4%) HD patients (P less than 0.00001). Anti-HCV was confirmed to be positive in three (1.1%) CAPD patients and eight (13.2%) HD patients using neutralisation enzyme immunoassay kits (Abbott Laboratories). The marked difference in prevalence of anti-HCV among CAPD and HD patients was related to a significantly greater transfusion requirement of the HD patients. All the anti-HCV positive patients had been transfused. The risk of HCV infection was significantly increased in those who had received more than five units of blood. Four (26.7%) anti-HCV positive patients had one or more episodes of elevated serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values.     

Detection of antibody to hepatitis C virus in renal transplant recipients.

Non-A, non-B hepatitis is a significant cause of liver disease among renal allograft recipients. In order to assess the impact and prevalence of hepatitis C in a series of renal allograft recipients, we retrospectively screened 621 consecutive patients transplanted between 1979 and 1989 and 484 cadaver organ donors retrieved in the same interval for serologic evidence of hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection using the enzyme-linked assay for anti-HCV antibody. Of 596 HBsAg negative patients, 180 (30%) were anti-HCV positive at the time of transplant. One-year posttransplant, 117 (22%) had detectable levels of anti-HCV antibody. Chemically significant hepatitis developed in 52/234 (22%) anti-HCV positive patients, and 26 of these followed a clinical course consistent with chronic hepatitis. Significantly more males and patients with antibody to HCV detectable at 1 year posttransplant were in the group experiencing an increase in liver enzymes. Ten-year patient and graft survival was 78% and 50%, respectively, for the anti-HCV positive patients who had an elevation of alanine aminotransferase, and 76% and 57% for the cohort maintaining normal liver function (P = NS). There were also no differences in patient and graft survival among the anti-HCV positive group and the consistently sero-negative patients. Of 484 cadaver organ donors with serum available for analysis (out of 1200 retrieved), 67 (14%) were anti-HCV positive at the time of organ donation. Among 23 anti-HCV negative kidney recipients who received a kidney from an HCV antibody positive donor, only one had seroconverted at 1 year posttransplant. Antibody to HCV appears to be widespread among renal transplant recipients and cadaver organ donors. We were unable to demonstrate any evidence of long-term adverse effects on patient and graft survival among anti-HCV positive patients employing the first generation anti-HCV assay.     

肾移植患者丙型肝炎病毒感染的研究

目的 了解肾移植患者ＨＣＶ感染情况及感染对临床影响。方法 对６７例肾移植患者进行至少１年的随访,用第二代酶联免疫吸附法（第二代ＥＬＩＳＡ法）和巢式多聚酶链反应（Ｎｅｓｔ－ＰＣＲ法）测定血清中丙型肝炎病毒抗体（抗ＨＣＶ）和丙型肝炎病毒核糖核酸（ＨＣＶＲＮＡ）,免疫组化链霉亲合 酶联法（ＬＳＡＢ法）测定丙型肝炎病毒非结构区３区、５区基因表达的抗原（ＨＣＶ－ＮＳ３、ＮＳ５抗原）。结果 抗ＨＣＶ阳性率５０