Abortive Headache Therapy in the Office With Intravenous Dihydroergotamine Plus Prochlorperazine

Over two years, 92 patients were treated in the office for 146 severe headache episodes. Headaches were aborted using four different intravenous regimens containing 0.5 or 1 mg. of dihydroergotamine and 3.5, 5, or 10 mg. of prochlorperazine. The speed and rate of response were directly proportional to the prochlorperazine dose used. High prochlorperazine doses (10 mg.) aborted the most headaches (95%) in the shortest time, but caused more sedation and akathesia. Low doses (3.5 mg.) aborted less headaches (89%) and responses were delayed; but, on the other hand, sedation was minimal and akathesia mild and uncommon. Dihydroergotamine given alone caused intolerable side effects; but, when it was given with prochlorperazine, efficacy was enhanced and side effects were greatly reduced. Aborting headaches in the office can be reliably achieved with minimal side effects by administering an intravenous mixture containing 1 mg. of dihydroergotamine and 3.5 mg. of prochlorperazine.     

Clinical Experience With Patient Administered Subcutaneous Dihydroergotamine Mesylate in Refractory Headaches

This study examines the practicality and efficacy of dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE) when self-administered subcutaneously in a population of refractory headache patients. Forty-three patients with chronic daily headache or migraine headache without aura, who had been taught self-injection of DHE either through the Raskin Protocol or in an outpatient headache clinic, were contacted by telephone and administered a questionnaire regarding usage and results from DHE injection. Ninety-two percent of patients could successfully administer DHE. Forty-six percent of patients experienced 90% or greater relief of pain and the majority of patients (77%) had greater than 50% relief. Emergency room use was decreased in 83% and 80% preferred DHE to their previous therapy. While side effects were common (79%), only four patients (9%) stopped DHE for this reason. No convincing evidence for the development of rebound headaches due to DHE was found in this sample.     

Continuous Intravenous Dihydroergotamine in the Treatment of Intractable Headache

We reviewed data on 171 patients with refractory headache treated by continuous intravenous dihydroergotamine mesylate (IV DHE 45 ÒÒ ) and repetitive IV DHE and compared the efficacy of continuous IV DHE to repetitive IV DHE. One hundred (58.5%) patients had refractory chronic daily headache. Seventy-one (42%) had drug rebound headache. One hundred thirty-eight (81%) had refractory migraine without aura, and 28 (16%) had migraine with aura. Treatment consisted of either continuous IV DHE by infusion pump or repetitive IV DHE and withdrawal of excessively used analgesics, analgesic narcotics, ergotamines, or benzodiazepines. Eighty-nine (92.5%) patients treated with continuous IV DHE became headache-free; the majority, 62 (64.5%), within 3 days. Sixty-five (86.5%) patients treated by repetitive IV DHE became headache-free, 50 (66.5%) within three days. The average hospital stay for both treatment groups was 4 days. Twelve (12.5%) of the continuous group and 12 (16%) of the repetitive group were headache-free within 24 hours. The average length of time to become headache-free was similar for the two groups, 3.06 days for continuous IV DHE and 2.94 days for repetitive IV DHE. The most common side effect was nausea, followed by diarrhea, vomiting, and leg cramps.
We conclude that DHE can be accurately and easily administered by continuous IV infusion pump, and that continuous IV DHE is a safe and efficacious mode of treatment producing results similar to repetitive IV DHE.     

Dihydroergotamine Suppositories in a Headache Clinic

SYNOPSIS
Dihydroergotamine (DHE) is available in the United States for parenteral use. We report a preliminary trial of DHE suppositories in an outpatient headache clinic setting. Dihydroergotamine suppositories may be appropriate for patients with catamenial migraine and classic migraine in particular.     

Home Administration of Intramuscular DHE for the Treatment of Acute Migraine Headache

SYNOPSIS
Dihydroergotamine (DHE) has been used for the treatment of acute migraine headache for almost 50 years. Previous studies have emphasized use in emergency room, inpatient, or office settings. Twenty-nine patients with migraine headache who had failed to obtain relief with conventional therapy were trained to self-administer intramuscular DHE. The patients administered 0.5 mg DHE and 100 mg trimethobenzamide at the onset of their headache and an additional O.5mg DHE if satisfactory headache relief was not obtained. Twenty patients were successfully contacted and interviewed. Forty-five percent of the patients had at least 50% relief of headache and continued to use the protocol. Eighty-two percent of patients who initially had at least 50% headache relief continued to use the drug, whereas none of the patients who initially had less than 10% relief continued the protocol. Sixty-one percent of patients whose headaches precluded continuation of activity had at least 50% response to initial treatment, whereas only 29% whose headaches were less severe had this response. Initial response to therapy was predictive of continued use of the treatment protocol and patients who described more severe headache had a higher response to the initial treatment. Thus, home administration of I.M. DHE offers an additional treatment regimen for patients with migraine headache.     

Dihydroergotamine nasal spray in the treatment of acute migraine

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dihydroergotamine (DHE) nasal spray in patients suffering from common or classical migraine. METHODS: In a double-blind parallel-group study, 52 outpatients with migraine were randomly allocated to DHE nasal spray or to placebo. Two puffs, one in each nostril, was taken as an initial dose (resulting in either 0.5 or 1 mg of DHE), followed by another puff (0.5 mg) after 30 and 60 minutes, if necessary, achieving a maximum dose of 2 mg for patients of the DHE 1-mg group or of 1.5 mg for patients of the 0.5-mg group. Four consecutive attacks were thus treated. The efficacy analysis was done for observed cases. The main outcome measure was reduction of the severity of the attacks. RESULTS: No differences were observed in the migraine characteristics or the number of treatments of the patients from the different groups. Dihydroergotamine 1 mg tended to provide better relief than 0.5 mg, although the effect was not statistically significant. Patients taking DHE used less rescue medications, with a dose-dependent effect. Side effects were reported by four patients receiving DHE but not placebo. The tolerability of the drug was assessed as good by 94% of the patients. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that DHE nasal spray is well tolerated and has dose-dependent efficacy in migraine.     

Treatment of Childhood Headache with Dihydroergotamine Mesylate

SYNOPSIS
This study was undertaken to determine whether pediatric patients with migraine without aura who have failed standard outpatient regimens including intravenous dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE) in conjunction with oral metoclopramide would respond to an inpatient treatment protocol of intravenous DHE and oral metoclopramide. Thirty patients were evaluated in this study which was an open label, retrospective review of treatment. Independent of the duration of the refractory migraine, 80% of the patients responded to the protocol with only minimal side effect. The dose of DHE mesylate ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 mg. The dose of DHE is lower than is typically utilized in standard adult protocols. The patients received an average of five doses of DHE.     

Use of Dihydroergotamine in Patients with Postconcussion Syndrome

SYNOPSIS
The experience with 34 patients who came to the Shreveport Headache Clinic for treatment of postconcussion headache is reviewed. All had been suffering from postconcussion (posttraumatic) syndrome for periods ranging from one day to more than three years, and all displayed, in addition to headache, at least three other symptoms characteristic of the syndrome, eg, memory problems, impaired concentration, sleep problems, dizziness, and anxiety. After initial evaluation at the clinic, the patients were admitted to Willis Knighton Medical Center and treated with repetitive administration of intravenous dihydroergotamine (DHE) and metoclopramide. A good to excellent overall response to DHE therapy was achieved by 88% (29) of the patients. The percentages and numbers of patients obtaining good to excellent relief of selected key symptoms were: 85% (28) - headache, 91% (30) - memory problems, 94% (31) - sleep problems, and 88% (29) - dizziness. DHE was well-tolerated, and no serious or unexpected adverse reactions were reported. The most frequently reported adverse reactions were mild nausea and brief worsening of headache.     

Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Dihydroergotamine by Home Injection for Migraine

The effectiveness of dihydroergotamine administered by home subcutaneous injection by the patient or family for severe headache attacks was assessed retrospectively in 51 patients. Average follow-up was 21 weeks. Twenty-one patients had intermittent migraine attacks, 27 had transformed migraine with chronic daily headache, and 3 had chronic tension-type headache. Of the 51 patients taught home injection, 35% had an excellent overall response 18% had a good response, 12% had a poor response but continued to use dihydroergotamine, and 35% had discontinued dihydroergotamine use. Side effects were the main reason for stopping dihydroergotamine. These included nausea or vomiting or both, limb pain or numbness or both, chest or throat tightness or both, and soreness at the injection site. Thirty-three patients (65%) continued to use dihydroergotamine at the end of the follow-up period. In patients who previously required injections from medical personnel for headache crises and in whom home injection of dihydroergotamine was effective, a dramatic reduction occurred in hospital emergency room and physician office utilization. Dihydroergotamine use by home injection can be an effective treatment for a significant proportion of patients with severe migraine including patients with transformed migraine and medication overuse.     

Dihydroergotamine and Metoclopramide in the Treatment of Organic Headache

Dihydroergotamine and metoclopramide have been used in the treatment of benign headache for many years. The presumed mechanism of action of dihydroergotamine and metoclopramide is related to these drugs' affinity for serotonergic receptors. We present three cases of the use of dihydroergotamine and metoclopramide in patients with organic headache (two patients with viral meningitis and one patient with meningeal carcinomatosis). All three patients had excellent symptomatic relief. Our results demonstrate that dihydroergotamine and metoclopramide can be effective in treating organic headache and, therefore, symptomatic relief can not be assumed to signify benign disease.     

Office-Based Treatment of Acute Migraine With Dihydroergotamine Mesylate

SYNOPSIS
The Regional Migraine Field Trial assessed the efficacy and safety of dihydroergotamine mesylate (D.H.E. 45 ^(r) ) for migraine in the office setting. Patients were admitted to the study provided they met the International Headache Society definition of migraine with or without aura. Thirty-eight neurologists enrolled 311 patients (274 women and 37 men) between the ages of 13 and 70 years in this open-design study. Ninety-five percent of the patients had moderate or severe headache pain at entry, and 62% had nausea. All patients received a single intramuscular injection of D.H.E. 45 ^(r) 1 mg. A second intramuscular injection of 1 mg was given 60 minutes after the first injection, if needed. An antiemetic was administered concomitantly with D.H.E. 45 ^(r) , if needed. Rescue therapy was given at the investigators' discretion. Efficacy was judged by the relief of pain, patients' ability to function, need for a second injection, need for rescue medication, and need for an antiemetic. At 30 and 60 minutes, 46% and 72% of patients had only mild or no head pain, respectively. At 24 hours, 77% of all patients had mild or no head pain. D.H.E. 45 ^(r) also improved functional ability. At 30 and 60 minutes, 58% and 75% of patients had only mild or no disability, respectively. At 24 hours, 81% had mild or no impairment. Nausea was present in 62% of patients at the outset, 40% of patients at 30 minutes, and 30% at 60 minutes. An antiemetic was given to 43% of patients at the outset. The presence of nausea was similar whether or not patients received an antiemetic. Rescue medication was needed for 11% of patients, and adverse events were reported by 9%. In conclusion, D.H.E. 45 ^(r) is effective therapy for acute migraine. A second dose provides additional relief, if needed.     

fficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Dihydroergotamine Nasal Spray as Monotherapy in the Treatment of Acute Migraine

Recently, a new nasal spray formulation of dihydroergotamine was developed which facilitates at-home treatment of migraine. We studied the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dihydroergotamine nasal spray as monotherapy in the acute treatment of classic and common migraine in two, identical, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Of the 229 patients enrolled, 206 (102 dihydroergotamine nasal spray, 104 placebo) were included in the intent-to-treat analyses; 182 treated two headaches and 24 treated one headache. Based on both the patients' and physicians' ratings, dihydroergotamine nasal spray was significantly superior to placebo for reducing the severity of headache pain in both studies, and in relieving nausea in Study 2. The onset of significant efficacy with dihydroergotamine nasal spray compared to that with placebo for both severity of headache pain and relief of nausea occurred at I hour in Study 2 and at 3 hours in Study 1. Dihydroergotamine nasal spray was also significantly superior to placebo for the relief of headache pain in both studies. Based on the physicians' global evaluations of treatment efficacy for headache pain, 71% of the dihydroergotamine-treated patients in Study 2 and 59% of their counterparts in Study 1 were considered to be responders. The dihydroergotamine-treated patients had less newly-occurring vomiting than the placebo-treated patients. The majority of adverse events reported by the dihydroergotamine-treated patients were nasopharyngeal. The results demonstrate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dihydroergotamine nasal spray as monotherapy in the treatment of acute migraine attacks.     

Inpatient Treatment of Status Migraine With Dihydroergotamine in Children and Adolescents

Objective.— To assess the effectiveness of aggressive therapy of status migraine in children and adolescents.
Background.— Inpatient management of pediatric status migraine and intractable headache is limited because of a lack of studies and guidelines. Adult treatment is often based on anecdotal experience, although a few controlled studies have been reported. Added to that is the discomfort of general pediatricians and neurologists in using available effective treatments in pediatric patients (such as dihydroergotamine: DHE).
Methods.— Charts of all patients admitted to the neurology service, at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center—Department of Neurology, for inpatient treatment for intractable headache/status migraine over a 6-week period were reviewed. Demographics, evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment used were tabulated. Data on the effectiveness of the treatments provided were evaluated. Thirty-two total consecutive charts were retrospectively reviewed during that period.
Results.— Upon discharge, 74.4% of the patients were headache-free. The mean severity of the pain upon discharge was 1.02 ± 2.22 (using the 0-10 pain scale).
Conclusion.— From our review, DHE is very effective in treating and aborting an episode of status migraine and should be offered to children and adolescent patients who have failed their usual abortive therapy to prevent further severe disability that mainly affects their schooling and social activities.     

Dihydroergotamine and Its Use in Migraine With Posterior Fossa Symptoms

Background.— Dihydroergotamine (DHE) has been used for decades to treat migraine, but is currently contraindicated in patients with hemiplegic migraine and basilar‐type migraine (BTM). Objective.— To assess the safety of DHE in patients with symptoms of BTM that do not meet criteria for BTM. Methods.— Retrospective analysis of patients admitted to an outpatient infusion room at a tertiary care center caring for patients with headache disorders. Incidence and types of adverse events as well as pain levels were reviewed and analyzed. Pain was assessed via the visual analog scale (VAS). Results.— Fifty consecutive patient records were reviewed. Mean age was 38.42. All patients met International Classification of Headache Disorders‐II (ICHD‐II) criteria for migraine and reported 1 posterior fossa symptom as defined by the ICHD‐II criteria for BTM. Patients did not necessarily have a posterior fossa symptom in the attack treated. Eighteen percent (9/50) patients had adverse events, and only 3 of these halted DHE infusion. No patients had neurologic or cardiologic events. The mean decrease in pain was 3 points on the VAS (P < .0001). Sixty‐two percent of patients achieved complete relief of headache with co‐administration of DHE and other medications. Conclusion.— Dihydroergotamine showed no serious adverse events in patients with 1 posterior fossa symptom and migraine. Larger, adequately powered, controlled, prospective trials are indicated to assess safety of DHE in BTM.     

Comparison of Dihydroergotamine With Metoclopramide Versus Meperidine With Promethazine in the Treatment of Acute Migraine

Migraineurs often seek office-based treatment for acute headache. To compare the efficacy and side effect profile, we entered 27 migraineurs into a prospective, randomized, double-blind study where each patient received either 75 mg meperidine with 25 mg promethazine IM or .5 mg dihydroergotamine with 10 mg metoclopramide IV. After I hour, pain relief was similar in the two groups, but side effects were significantly greater in the meperidine with promethazine regimen group. The dihydroergotamine with metoclopramide regimen is effective, and has minimal side effects, making it an attractive method for office-based treatment of acute migraine.     

The Treatment of Cluster Headache With Repetitive Intravenous Dihydroergotamine

We reviewed our experience with 54 cluster headache patients (23 episodic, 31 chronic) admitted to our headache center 64 tines over the past five years and treated with repetitive intravenous dihydroergotamine (IV DHE). DHE therapy was initiated on admission and prophylactic medication regimens were started or adjusted. All 54 patients had complete relief of their cluster headache, usually within two days. Most (82.8%) had no side effects. The average length of hospitalization was 6.7 days. At the three month followup, 92.9% of the episodic cluster patients were headache-free and 7.1% had a 50-74% improvement; at six months, all were headache-free. Of the chronic cluster patients, 44.4% were headache-free at three months and 52.8% had at least 50% improvement. At six months, 75% were headache-free and 22.2% were at least 75% improved, probably as a result of continued prophylactic medication. Repetitive IV DHE safely, rapidly, and effectively controls cluster headache.     

Outpatient Home‐Based Continuous Intravenous Dihydroergotamine Therapy for Intractable Migraine

(Headache 2010;50:852‐860) Background.— Established consecutive‐day inpatient intravenous dihydroergotamine protocols administered by bolus intravenous injection or continuous infusion injection in the hospital have demonstrated efficacy and safety in modifying the course of daily intractable headache. We conducted a study to determine efficacy, tolerability, and feasibility to treat patients with daily intractable headache with continuous intravenous dihydroergotamine in an outpatient home‐based setting. Methods.— A total of 31 patients fulfilling ICHD‐II criteria for chronic daily headache, 25 with chronic migraine and 6 with medication overuse headache, were treated with outpatient home‐based continuous intravenous dihydroergotamine for 3 days. Patients were pretreated with 10 mg intravenous metoclopramide prior to the first day of infusion and administered 3 mg dihydroergotamine given continuously at a rate of 42 mL/hour on day 1 and 2, and administered 1.5 mg on day 3 at the rate of 21 mL/hour. The primary end point was a change in pain intensity, as measured by an 11‐point numeric pain intensity scale at the end of 3 days. The secondary end point was reduction in headache frequency at long‐term follow‐up. Results.— Patients reported an average of 63.4% reduction in the intensity of migraine pain by the end of the 3‐day infusion. Side effects were minimal and no serious adverse effects occurred. Approximately one‐third of patients became completely headache‐free after day 3, and 1 patient had no improvement. Long‐term follow‐up data indicated an average 86% reduction in headache frequency and almost every patient converted from chronic daily headache to episodic migraine except for 1 patient. Patients with medication overuse headache were no longer consuming the daily offending medication. Conclusions.— Efficacy and safety of our outpatient home‐based intravenous dihydroergotamine program compared favorably to that of established inpatient intravenous pulse injection and continuous infusion protocols for the treatment of intractable migraine. The use of outpatient continuous intravenous dihydroergotamine is an effective and well‐tolerated therapy for intractable migraine but without the added cost and inconvenience of hospitalization.     

肌内注射硬结的临床防治研究

目的预防并治疗臀部肌内注射的硬结形成。方法将100例住院患者随机分为实验组（W型注射法）和对照组（常规肌内注射法）各50例,取右侧臀部注射,比较两组患者注射部位不良反应的发生情况;取同期双侧臀部均有硬结的患者40例,采用自身对照的方法,比较跌打丸外敷与湿热敷治疗硬结的效果。结果实验组与对照组完成观察期例数、接受注射平均天数、注射部位出现局部反应的例数及最初出现局部反应的平均天数,经统计学检验,P值均小于0．01;跌打丸外敷治疗硬结的有效率显著优于湿热敷（P〈0．01）。结论W型注射法可降低肌注硬结形成率,跌打丸外敷是治疗肌注硬结的有效方法。