Regional management of arterial hypertension in France. Report of a survey of general practitioners

A survey was conducted in 14 regional samples of general practitioners (GPs) included in Gallup-up poll. 2,423 GPs contributed to the study and had to include all patients > 18 years old over a period of one week. Patients were considered hypertensives if the mean of two recorded BP measurements was > or = 140/90 mmHg and/or < 140/90 mmHg if they were under antihypertensive treatment. Hypertensives were considered as controlled if there BP levels were overall < 140/90 mmHg under treatment. The risk factors associated with hypertension were collected in order to evaluate the cardiovascular risk, according to 1999 ISH-OMS recommendations. 156,470 patients recruited by 2423 GPs were included in the study representing 14 different French regions: Ile-de-France I (1), Ile-de-France II (2), Ile-de-France-Pays-de-la-Loire (3), Bretagne (4), Normandie-Picardie (5), Nord-Pas-de-Calais (6), Alsace-Lorraine (7), Bourgogne-Franche Comté (8), Rh?nes-Alpes (9), Provence-C?te d'Azur (10), Languedoc-Provence (11), Limousin-Auvergne (12), Midi-Pyrénées (13), Aquitaine (14). Among 70,073 hypertensives, 23,054 had never received antihypertensive treatment, and 32,059 (47%) had a high or a very high cardiovascular risk. 67% of hypertensives (47,019) were treated, and 32.8% of treated hypertensives (15,422) had a BP < 140/90 mmHg. The study illustrated few differences in prevalence and control of hypertension in the different French regions: BP control at the 140/90 mmHg threshold vary from 28.5 to 36.6% among treated hypertensives and % of patients at high cardiovascular risk from 42.1% (South-France) to 49.7% (East-France).     

Real-life appraisal on blood pressure targets achievement in adult outpatients at high cardiovascular risk

Background and aimAlthough hypertension guidelines highlight the benefits of achieving the recommended blood pressure (BP) targets, hypertension control rate is still insufficient, mostly in high or very high cardiovascular (CV) risk patients. Thus, we aimed to estimate BP control in a cohort of patients at high CV risk in both primary and secondary prevention.Methods and resultsA single-center, cross-sectional study was conducted by extracting data from a medical database of adult outpatients aged 40–75 years, who were referred to our Hypertension Unit, Rome (IT), for hypertension assessment. Office BP treatment targets were defined according to 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines as: a)<130/80 mmHg in individuals aged 40–65 years; b)<140/80 mmHg in subjects aged >65 years. Primary prevention patients with SCORE <5% were considered to be at low-intermediate risk, whilst individuals with SCORE ≥5% or patients with comorbidities were defined to be at very high risk. Among 6354 patients (47.2% female, age 58.4 ± 9.6 years), 4164 (65.5%) were in primary prevention with low-intermediate CV risk, 1831 (28.8%) in primary prevention with high-very high CV risk and 359 (5.6%) in secondary prevention. In treated hypertensive outpatients, uncontrolled hypertension rate was significantly higher in high risk primary prevention than in low risk primary prevention and secondary prevention patients (18.4% vs 24.4% vs. 12.5%, respectively; P < 0.001). In high risk primary prevention diabetic patients only 10% achieved the recommended BP targets.ConclusionsOur data confirmed unsatisfactory BP control among high-risk patients, both in primary and secondary prevention, and suggest the need for a more stringent BP control policies in these patients.     

Aterial hypertension and cardiovascular risk factors associated with diabetes. Report of the PHARE survey in general practice

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the characteristics of diabetic hypertensive patients (Pts), in term of associated cardiovascular risk factors and blood pressure control in a representative population issued from a survey "PHARE" conducted in general practice in France in 1999. DESIGN AND METHODS: PHARE survey was conducted in a sample of 225 GPs representative of the French medical population included in a gallup poll. GPs had to include all patients > 18 years old over a period of one week. Pts were considered as hypertensives (HP) if the mean of two recorded BP measurements was = 140/90 mmHg and/or < 140/90 mmHg if they were under antihypertensive treatment. Patients were considered as diabetics if they were previously known and/or if they received a medication for diabetes. Hypertensives were considered as controlled if their BP levels were overall < 140/90 mmHg or at the recommended threshold < 130/85 mmHg under treatment. RESULTS: 877 diabetic Pts (7%) among 12.342 Pts and 5.190 HP were included in the study. When compared to normotensives, diabetic HP had more frequently associated risk factors with hypertension and diabetes: overweight 71% vs 45%, dyslipidemia 61% vs 34%, sendentarily 73% vs 63%, tobacco consumption 27% vs 20%. The BP control at 140/90 mmHg threshold among treated diabetic HP was 21%, and only 8% at 130/85 mmHg. Regarding WHO classification, 79% of these diabetics had a high or very high cardiovascular risk. The were no difference in antihypertensive drugs used in HP diabetics and non diabetics and 50% of them received ACEI. CONCLUSIONS: 8 from 10 diabetics taken in charge in general practice are hypertensives and 8 from 10 have a very high cardiovascular risk due to a poor BP control and associated cardiovascular risk factors.     

Arterial hypertension management in general practice in France according to global risk factors

OBJECTIVE: The absolute benefit of antihypertensive medications increases with the level of cardiovascular risk. Moreover in high risk groups, it has been demonstrated that tight blood pressure (BP) control conferred a substantial reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events compared to less tight BP control. Taking into accounts these data, the WHO guidelines recommend to achieve normal BP in high risk subjects. The aim of the study was to assess BP control in a large population of hypertensives (HT) after stratification by cardiovascular risk. METHODS: 15,514 HT defined as office BP > or = 140/90 or the presence of antihypertensive treatment were recruited in France by 3,152 general practitioners. Cardiovascular risk factors and office BP were recorded. Controlled hypertension was defined as a BP < 140/90 mmHg. In patients free of cardiovascular disease, 10-year cardiovascular risks were calculated on the basis of the equations derived from the Framingham Study. RESULTS: 10-year risks were available in 13,560 HT. Those in the highest quartile had greater body mass index (BMI) and the highest concentration of diabetics and current smokers (upper quartile versus lower quartile: BMI: 28.15 vs 26.51 kg/m2; diabetics: 45% vs 3%; current smoking 32% vs 12%; p < .001). [table: see text] Increasing quartiles of risk were associated with the prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension and at a lesser extent with the use of combination therapy. Subjects in the upper quartile had more frequent calcium-blockers, ACE inhibitors and diuretics use and a less frequent betablocker use. CONCLUSION: In general practice, 85% of hypertensives at highest risk are uncontrolled whereas half of them are under monotherapy. An antihypertensive strategy based on global risk may improve BP control in high risk patients.     

Treatment of hypertension in patients 85 years of age or older: a J-BRAVE substudy

Whether the strict control of blood pressure (BP) of patients with hypertension who are aged 85 years or older is beneficial is unclear. The Japan's Benidipine Research on Antihypertensive Effects in the Elderly study is a prospective, observational 3-year study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of treatment with a calcium channel blocker benidipine in 8897 hypertensive patients aged 65 years or older as a post-marketing surveillance. We examined the relationship between the achieved BP and cardiovascular events (i.e., stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure) in a subgroup of 415 patients aged 85 years or older (mean age 88 years). BP decreased significantly from 165 ± 14/84 ± 10 mmHg to 130 ± 11/71 ± 10 mmHg during treatment in patients with a treated systolic BP (SBP) < 140 mmHg (n = 230) and BP decreased significantly from 169 ± 16/86 ± 12 mmHg to 143 ± 13/75 ± 10 mmHg in those with a treated SBP ≥ 140 mmHg (n = 185). There was a nonsignificant trend toward a lower rate of cardiovascular events and higher rate of total death in patients with a treated SBP < 140 mmHg. On-treatment SBP ≥ 160 mmHg is tended to associate with a higher incidence of cardiovascular events. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the controlled BP group (3.04%) and the less well controlled BP group (3.24%). In conclusion, although this study was not powered for definitive conclusion, there was a nonsignificant trend toward a lower rate of cardiovascular events and higher total death in patients aged 85 years or older with a treated SBP < 140 mmHg.     

Association between blood pressure, the treatment of hypertension, and cardiovascular risk factors in women

OBJECTIVE: To examine relationships of normal blood pressure (BP), hypertension and degree of BP control with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and predicted 10-year risks for coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: 107 Marks and Spencer retail stores in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 14,077 women, aged 30-64 years, screened for CVD risk factors between 1988 and 1991. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP; total, high-(HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, ratio of total to HDL cholesterol (TC/HDL-C); triglycerides, apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B, lipoprotein (a), glucose, body mass index, antihypertensive medication and predicted risks for CHD and stroke. Hypertension was defined as SBP > or = 140 mmHg and/or DBP > or = 90 mmHg and/or taking anti-hypertensive medication. Subjects were divided into normotensives with optimal (n = 6,599), normal (n = 3,170) and high normal (n = 2,184) BP levels, and hypertensives with adequate BP control (n = 228), untreated (n = 1,729) and inadequate BP control (n = 291). RESULTS: BP level was associated with other CVD risk factors among both normotensives and hypertensives. Women with inadequately controlled BP had the worst risk profile, followed by untreated hypertensives, those with adequately controlled BP and normotensives. Odds ratios for being in the top quintile of predicted 10-year CHD and stroke risks were 1, 2.7, 4.2, 8.5, 13.0, 18.9 for CHD; 1, 1.1, 5.8, 18.7, 20.6, 756 for stroke, for optimal, normal, high normal, adequate BP control, untreated and inadequate BP control groups respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Untreated hypertensives and women taking anti-hypertensive medication but with BP > or = 140/90 mmHg have the most atherogenic risk factor profiles. Effective management of BP and the associated CVD risk requires a multi-factorial approach, rather than addressing BP control in isolation.     

Global cardiovascular risk profiles of untreated hypertensives in an urban, developing community in Africa

Introduction

Blood pressure (BP) control in people of African descent is poor, largely because of a lack of treatment. Although the requirements for immediate initiation of antihypertensive drug therapy are defined by global cardiovascular risk, the global cardiovascular risk profiles of untreated hypertensives at a community level are uncertain.

Aim

To identify the distribution of global cardiovascular risk profiles of untreated hypertensives in an urban, developing community of African descent in South Africa.

Methods

As part of the African Programme on Genes in Hypertension, we assessed nurse-derived clinic BP (the mean of five standardised BP values obtained according to guidelines), current antihypertensive therapy, and total cardiovascular risk in 1 029 participants older than 16 years of age from randomly selected nuclear families from the South West Township of Gauteng (SOWETO).

Results

Approximately 46% of participants had systolic/diastolic BP values ≥ 140/90 mmHg and ~23% of participants were hypertensives not receiving antihypertensive medication. Approximately 12% of untreated hypertensives had a high added risk and ~18% a very high added risk (6.7% of the total sample). In untreated hypertensives, in contrast to the absence of severe hypertension and diabetes mellitus in those with lower risk profiles, a high cardiovascular risk profile in this group was characterised by severe hypertension in ~52% and diabetes mellitus in ~33%. Based on a high added risk carrying at least a 20% chance and a very high added risk at least a 30% chance of a cardiovascular event in 10 years, this translates into 1 740 events per 100 000 of the population within 10 years, events that could be prevented through antihypertensive drug therapy.

Conclusions

In an urban, developing community of African ancestry, a significant proportion (6.7%) of people may have untreated hypertension and a global cardiovascular risk profile that suggests a need for antihypertensive drug therapy. Cardiovascular risk in this group is driven largely by the presence of severe hypertension or diabetes mellitus.     

Pharmacotherapy and blood pressure control in elderly hypertensives in a primary care setting in Bahrain

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Antihypertensive treatment in the elderly has important beneficial effects in terms of reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine, in elderly hypertensives, the adherence of primary care physicians to World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) guidelines for the drug management of hypertension and extent of blood pressure (BP) control. METHODS: A multicentric therapeutic audit of medical records of elderly hypertensives was performed in nine primary care health centers in the Kingdom of Bahrain. RESULTS: In elderly hypertensives (> or =60 years), the WHO/ISH-1999 recommended BP targets of <140/<90 mmHg and BP<130/85 mmHg were achieved in 11.1% of elderly hypertensives and 4.1% of elderly diabetic hypertensives, respectively. Antihypertensive combination therapy was used in approximately half of the elderly. No significant difference in BP was found in elderly hypertensives treated either with monotherapy or combination therapy. As regards mono- and overall drug utilization, beta-blockers were the most frequently prescribed drugs in hypertensives, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in diabetic hypertensives. Diuretics and calcium channel blockers, the preferred antihypertensives for the elderly, were less often prescribed, particularly in patients with isolated systolic hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one out of 9 elderly hypertensives and one out of 24 diabetic hypertensives achieved optimal BP control. Although preference for antihypertensives was markedly influenced by comorbidity with diabetes, tailoring of drug therapy was suboptimal and did not adhere to the recommended guidelines in elderly hypertensives. Efforts to improve the drug management of hypertension at primary care level, particularly in the elderly, are required.     

Hypertension management in patients with stable coronary disease

AIMS: To assess hypertension control in patients with stable coronary disease in France. DESIGN: A cross sectional study was conducted in a representative sample of 794 cardiologists. PARTICIPANTS: The first 6 patients with coronary disease received at practitioner's office were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiovascular risk factors, antihypertensive drugs, cardiovascular history were reported. BP was measured. Patients considered as hypertensive by his cardiologist and receiving antihypertensive drugs were considered as hypertensive. Controlled hypertension was defined as a blood pressure < 140/90 mmHg. Uncontrolled hypertension was defined as blood pressure > or = 140/90 mmHg. Among the uncontrolled hypertensives we distinguished patients with isolated systolic hypertension: diastolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg and systolic blood pressure > or = 140 mmHg. RESULTS: All variables were available in 6,349 patients who form the basis of this report. 3,161 patients were hypertensive. Of them, 1,846 (58.4%) were uncontrolled hypertensives, whom 1,280 (69.3%) were uncontrolled on the basis of systolic blood pressure alone. CONCLUSION: This study conducted in a representative sample of French cardiologists indicates that there is a considerable potential to further reduce cardiovascular morbidity in patients in secondary prevention.     

Blood pressure control in Japanese hypertensives with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension are thought to be at high risk for cardiovascular diseases. Recent guidelines for treatment of hypertension such as the JNC VI and WHO/ISH guidelines, recommend that antihypertensive agents be strated at as low as at 130/85 mmHg and that blood pressure be lowered to less than 130/85 mmHg. Our study was designed to clarify how well and to what extent blood pressure (BP) was controlled in Japanese hypertensive patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus. We interviewed two hundred physicians, randomly sellected from among the members of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH) (n=98) and the Japanese Diabetes Society (JDS) (n=102) and obtained information regarding five most recent cases of hypertension with (n=954 in total) and their 2 most recent cases of hypertension without diabetes (n=371 in total). The achieved BP was below 140/90 mmHg in 40.5% of non-diabetic and 38.3% of diabetic hypertensives. The percentage of patients whose BP was less than 130/85 mmHg was 10.8% in nondiabetics and 11.4% in diabetics. The average number of hypotensive agents used was 1.46 in nondiabetics and 1.52 in diabetics. Physicians prescribed more ACE inhibitors and alpha-blockers in diabetics than in nondiabetics, although Ca-antagonists were administered in more than 70% of patients irrespective of whether or not they had diabetes. In contrast, fewer beta-blockers and diuretics were administered to diabetics. These results suggest that although Japanese physicians are considering the effects of hypotensive agents on metabolism and renal function when they treat diabetic hypertensives, the achieved blood pressure in both hypertensives with and those without diabetes is insufficient, with only one of ten patients having a blood pressure less than 130/85 mmHg even among diabetics. Improved blood pressure control will therefore be needed to treat high risk groups such as patients with diabetes mellitus.     

High prevalence of cardiac and extracardiac target organ damage in refractory hypertension.

OBJECTIVE : Target organ damage (TOD) in chronically treated hypertensives is related to effective blood pressure (BP) control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of cardiac and extracardiac TOD in patients with refractory hypertension (RH) compared with well-controlled treated hypertensives (C). METHODS : Fifty-four consecutive patients with RH (57 +/- 10 years), selected according to WHO/ISH guidelines definition, and 51 essential hypertensives (55 +/- 10 years) with satisfactory BP control obtained by association therapy, underwent the following procedures: (1) clinic BP measurement; (2) blood sampling for routine chemistry examinations; (3) 24 h urine collection for microalbuminuria; (4) non-mydriatic retinography; (5) echocardiogram; (6) carotid ultrasonogram. In order to exclude 'office resistance' (defined as clinic BP > 140/90 mmHg and average 24 h BP or =1.0 mm, respectively); a higher prevalence of carotid plaques (65 versus 32%, P < 0.05), a more advanced retinal involvement (grade II and III, 73 and 5% versus 38 and 0%, P < 0.01) and a greater albumin urinary excretion (22 +/- 32 mg/24 h versus 11 +/- 13 mg/24 h, P < 0.01) were found in RH compared to C. CONCLUSIONS : Our study suggests that RH is a clinical condition associated with a high prevalence of TOD at cardiac, macro- and microvascular level and consequently with high absolute cardiovascular risk, which needs a particularly intensive therapeutic approach aimed to normalize BP levels and to induce TOD regression.     

Blood pressure control after acute coronary events. Results of the PREVENIR study

OBJECTIVE: The difficulty in controlling hypertension in coronary patients has been underlined. The aim of the study was to assess blood pressure profile (BP) at hospital discharge in a large population of survivors of an acute coronary syndrome. DESIGN AND METHODS: An observational study was conducted in France in 77 cardiological centers. The medical records of all patients admitted in these hospitals on January 1998 for a myocardial infarction or unstable angina and who survived were studied. Clinical characteristics and BP at hospital discharge were recorded. Patients with blood pressure > or = 140/90 mmHg were considered as uncontrolled hypertensives (HT). RESULTS: Data were available in 1327 of the 1394 patients recruited: at hospital discharge, 344 patients (25.9%) were controlled and 431 (32.4%) were uncontrolled hypertensives. Among these patients, 406 (94.1%) had systolic blood pressure > or = 140 mmHg, 139 (32.2%) had diastolic blood pressure > or = 90 mmHg and 292 patients (67.7%) had systolic blood pressure > or = 140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg. Pulse pressure in controlled hypertensives (51.02 +/- 10.93 mmHg) was quite similar to that in normotensives (47.81 +/- 9.84 mmHg) whereas pulse pressure was significantly higher in uncontrolled hypertensives (65.86 +/- 13.29 mmHg). CONCLUSION: At hospital discharge after a coronary event, arterial hypertension is uncontrolled in 32.4% of patients mainly because of poor systolic blood pressure control. Achieving normal blood pressure throughout the hospitalisation should improve long term blood pressure control, reduce pulse pressure and improve the prognosis in this high risk population.     

Swiss Hypertension and Risk Factor Program (SHARP): cardiovascular risk factors management in patients with type 2 diabetes in Switzerland

The prevalence of hypertension in type 2 diabetics is high, though there is no published data for Switzerland. This prospective cohort survey determined the frequency of type 2 diabetes mellitus associated with hypertension from medical practitioners in Switzerland, and collected data on the diagnostic and therapeutic work-up for cardiovascular risk patients. The Swiss Hypertension And Risk Factor Program (SHARP) is a two-part survey: The first part, I-SHARP, was a survey among 1040 Swiss physicians to assess what are the target blood pressure (BP) values and preferred treatment for their patients. The second part, SHARP, collected data from 20,956 patients treated on any of 5 consecutive days from 188 participating physicians. In I-SHARP, target BP?135/85 mmHg, as recommended by the Swiss Society of Hypertension, was the goal for 25% of physicians for hypertensives, and for 60% for hypertensive diabetics; values >140/90 mmHg were targeted by 19% for hypertensives, respectively 9% for hypertensive diabetics. In SHARP, 30% of the 20,956 patients enrolled were hypertensive (as defined by the doctors) and 10% were diabetic (67% of whom were also hypertensive). Six per cent of known hypertensive patients and 4% of known hypertensive diabetics did not receive any antihypertensive treatment. Diabetes was not treated pharmacologically in 20% of diabetics. Proteinuria was not screened for in 45% of known hypertensives and in 29% of known hypertensive diabetics. In Switzerland, most physicians set target BP levels higher than recommended in published guidelines. In this country with easy access to medical care, high medical density and few financial constraints, appropriate detection and treatment for cardiovascular risk factors remain highly problematic.     

Prevalence, awareness, treatment, control and risk factors of hypertension in Korea: the Ansan study

OBJECTIVES: To determine prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, and its risk factors in an urban Korean population. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional survey in Ansan-city, Korea. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Population-based samples of people aged 18-92 years in Ansan-city, Korea, were selected, yielding 2278 men and 1948 women, and their blood pressures were measured using a highly standardized protocol. Hypertension was defined as a systolic BP > or = 140 mmHg or diastolic BP > or = 90 mmHg or reported treatment with antihypertensive medications, and subclassified according to 1999 WHO-ISH guidelines. Isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) defined as a systolic BP > or = 140 mmHg and diastolic BP < 90 mmHg was also examined. Data were stratified by age and sex. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of hypertension in this study was 33.7%. Among these, 64.9% had Grade 1 hypertension, 22.5% Grade 2, and 12.5% Grade 3. Age-specific prevalence of hypertension increased progressively with age, from 14.19% in 18 to 24 year-olds to 71.39% in those 75 years or older. Hypertension prevalence was significantly higher in men (41.5%) than in women (24.5%) (P < 0.001). Isolated systolic hypertension had significantly lower prevalence (4.33%) within the population, although in the elderly aged 55 years or more it rose by 11.13%. Overall, 24.6% of hypertensive individuals were aware that they had high blood pressure, as much as 78.6% were being treated with antihypertensive medications, and 24.3% were under control. Hypertension awareness as well as treatment and control rates varied by sex, with women higher in all three rates. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, body mass index and abdomen circumference were significantly associated with prevalence of hypertension both in men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertension is highly prevalent in Korea. Despite the high rate of treatment, the rates of awareness and control are relatively low, suggesting the nationwide demand for preventing and controlling high blood pressure in Korea in order to avert an epidemic of cardiovascular disease.     

Prevalence and determinants of undertreatment of hypertension in the Netherlands

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension, and the determinants of undertreatment in the Dutch population. The study design was cross-sectional. A population-based survey on cardiovascular disease risk factors in the Netherlands from 1996 to 2002 was the setting of the study. A total of 10 820 men and women, aged 30-59 years, were included in the study. The main outcome measures of the study were: Prevalence of hypertension, treatment, and control of hypertension and determinants of undertreatment of hypertension. Hypertension was defined as: systolic blood pressure (SBP) > or =140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or =90 mmHg, and/or the use of antihypertensive medication. Treated and controlled hypertension was defined as SBP <140 mmHg and DBP <90 mmHg. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the determinants of undertreatment. The prevalence of hypertension in men was 21.4% and in women 14.9%, and 17.9% of the hypertensive men and 38.5% of the hypertensive women were receiving antihypertensive medication. Of the untreated hypertensives, 21.9% of the men and 13.6% of the women were eligible for treatment with antihypertensive medication according to Dutch guidelines. Female gender and the use of cholesterol-lowering medication were associated with an increased chance of being treated. Subjects who were physically active, on a low salt diet, and current smokers had an increased chance of being untreated. Taking cholesterol-lowering medication and no asthma or allergy were factors associated with better control of blood pressure. In conclusion, a considerable proportion of hypertensives were untreated and uncontrolled. Therefore, the detection and control of hypertension in the Netherlands needs to improve. Several groups of hypertensives were identified that need additional care and attention.     

Assessment of a non-physician screening program for hypertension and cardiovascular risk in community pharmacies

Background and aimsThe strategic role of prevention in hypertension setting is well known but, with the only exception of annually events promoted by international scientific societies, no other screening campaigns are available. Aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a non-physician pharmacy-based screening program and to describe the cardiovascular risk and the BP status of participating subjects.Methods and results2731 costumers participated to the screening program, answering to a questionnaire about personal cardiovascular risk and measuring their BP with an Omron HEM 1040-E. Since no threshold for hypertension diagnosis is currently available for community pharmacies BP measurements, we assessed high BP prevalence according to 3 different cut-offs (≥140/90, ≥135/85 and ≥ 130/80 mmHg) and compared normotensives and hypertensives on major cardiovascular risk factors. According to the proposed cut-offs, prevalence of hypertension was respectively of 31%, 45% and 59.5%, and it increased among younger subjects (31–65 y) when the lowest cut-offs were applied. High BP was found in a large percentage of subjects self-declared on-/not on-treatment (uncontrolled hypertensives) or normotensives (presumptive hypertensives) and among those not aware of their own BP values (presumptive hypertensives). Prevalence of CV risk factors was higher in hypertensives than in normotensives.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrated that a community pharmacy-based screening is feasible and attracts the interests of many subjects, improving awareness on their BP status. The screening was also showed to be useful in order to detect potentially uncontrolled and/or suspected new hypertensives, especially among young adults, to refer to general practitioners for confirmatory diagnosis or further evaluation.     

Clinical prediction of normotension in borderline hypertensive men--a 10 year study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) as a tool for long-term prediction of future blood pressure (BP) status in high normal and low stage 1 hypertensives. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 165 men from a population screening program with diastolic BP (DBP) 85-94 mmHg and a systolic BP (SBP) < 150 mmHg performed a 24-h ABPM. Ten years later, 120 participants (73%) returned for renewed measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure status at 10 years. RESULTS: At the 10-year follow-up, 53% of the participants were classified as hypertensive (HT) (BP > or = 140/90 or taking anti-hypertensive medication) and 47% were classified as normotensive (NT) (BP < 140/90 mmHg). There was no significant baseline differences in office SBP levels between those who were normotensive or hypertensive at follow-up (136/91 versus 138/92 mmHg), whereas both SBP and DBP night-time levels were significantly lower in the future normotensives as compared to the future hypertensives (107/69 versus 112/74 mmHg, P < 0.01). Using recommended normalcy night-time ABP levels of < 120/75 mmHg in addition to office BP (140/90) at baseline, over 85% of the subjects were correctly classified provided they met both clinic and ambulatory night-time criteria for HT and NT classification at baseline. CONCLUSION: The use of ABPM in addition to office BP's in patients with borderline hypertension greatly increases the possibility of identifying those individuals who are at a very small risk of developing future hypertension. This could potentially lead to considerable savings in both patient anxiety, physician time and resource consumption.     

Blood pressure control in Italy: results of recent surveys on hypertension

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) control is reported to be poor in hypertensive patients worldwide. OBJECTIVE: BP levels, the rate of BP control, prevalence of risk factors and total cardiovascular risk were assessed in a large cohort of hypertensive patients, derived from recent surveys performed in Italy. METHODS: Fifteen studies on hypertension, performed in different clinical settings (general population, general clinical practice, specialist outpatient clinics and hypertension centres) over the past decade were considered. RESULTS: The overall sample included 52 715 hypertensive patients (26 315 men and 26 410 women, mean age 57.3 +/- 6.9 years). Despite the high percentage of patients on stable antihypertensive treatment (n = 36 556, 69%), mean systolic and diastolic BP levels were 147.8 +/- 8.5 and 89.5 +/- 5.2 mmHg, respectively. On the basis of the nature of the study (population surveys or clinical referrals), systolic BP levels were consistently higher than the normality threshold in both settings (142.6 +/- 12.4/84.8 +/- 3.7 mmHg and 150.4 +/- 4.6/91.9 +/- 4.1 mmHg, respectively). The BP stratification could be assessed in 40 829 individuals: 4.5% had optimal, 9.2% normal and 8.3% high-normal BP levels, however, the large majority were in grade 1 (39%) or grades 2-3 (32.6%) hypertension. In the overall sample, 55.9% of hypertensive patients had hypercholesterolemia, 28.7% were smokers, 36.4% were overweight or obese and 15.0% had diabetes mellitus. Cardiovascular risk stratification was assessed in 37 813 hypertensives: 23.2% had low, 33.9% moderate, 30.2% high and 12.7% very high added risk. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrates the persistence of poor BP control and high prevalence of risk factors, supporting the need for more effective, comprehensive and urgent actions to improve the clinical management of hypertension.     

The estimation of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients is not modified by management of the hypertension

OBJECTIVES: To compare antihypertensive therapeutic strategies and efficacy whether the physicians were aware or not of the calculated cardiovascular risk at 10 years obtained from the Framingham equation. It was also possible to evaluate the concordance of the general physicians estimation of the cardiovascular risk with the calculated percentage. METHODS: The participation of 953 general physicians to the study allowed to achieve an estimation of the absolute cardiovascular risk for 1,243 hypertensives. Patients were randomised in 2 groups according to the knowledge or not by the physicians of the calculated risk. The therapeutic strategy included a monotherapy (Fosinopril 20 mg/days) for a follow up of 8 weeks, with the possibility to increase the treatment after 4 weeks (Fosinopril + hydrochlorotiazide). To be included, patients had to be more than 18 and less than 75 years, and a blood pressure above 140/90 mmHg. Estimated and calculated cardiovascular risk at 10 years, were classified according to the 1999 WHO-ISH guidelines: low risk < 15%, medium risk 15-20%, high risk 20-30%, very high risk > 30%. RESULTS: In this population, aged 60 +/- 10 years, with 54% of men, the concordance between estimated risk and calculated risk was of 35%. This concordance was better for the "low risk" and "very high risk", but remains inferior to 50%. The determinants of concordance were: gender (male), smoking and a low HDL cholesterol. After 8 weeks of treatment, no difference was observed between the 2 groups concerning final blood pressure level, percentage of normalised patients and number of patients with bi-therapy. CONCLUSIONS: General physicians estimation of cardiovascular risk at 10 years of hypertensive subjects has a bad concordance with the calculated risk according to Framingham equation. The results of this study indicate that the estimation of cardiovascular risk of hypertensive subjects does not modify the management of hypertension.