Chronic allograft nephropathy

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is the leading cause of renal allograft loss in paediatric renal transplant recipients. CAN is the result of immunological and nonimmunological injury, including acute rejection episodes, hypoperfusion, ischaemia reperfusion, calcineurin toxicity, infection and recurrent disease. The development of CAN is often insidious and may be preceded by subclinical rejection in a well-functioning allograft. Classification of CAN is histological using the Banff classification of renal allograft pathology with classic findings of interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, glomerulosclerosis, fibrointimal hyperplasia and arteriolar hyalinosis. Although improvement in immunosuppression has led to greater 1-year graft survival rates, chronic graft loss remains relatively unchanged and opportunistic infectious complications remain a problem. Protocol biopsy monitoring is not current practice in paediatric transplantation for CAN monitoring but may have a place if new treatment options become available. Newer immunosuppression regimens, closer monitoring of the renal allograft and management of subclinical rejection may lead to reduced immune injury leading to CAN in the paediatric population but must be weighed against the risk of increased immunosuppression and calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity.     

Chronic allograft nephropathy

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) remains the Achilles heel of renal transplantation. In spite of the significant strides achieved in one-year renal allograft survival with newer immunosuppressant strategies, the fate of long-term renal allograft survival remains unchanged. The number of renal transplant recipients returning to dialysis has doubled in the past decade. This is especially important since these patients pose a significantly increased likelihood of dying while on the waiting list for retransplantation, due to increasing disparity between donor organ availability versus demand and longer waiting time secondary to heightened immunologic sensitization from their prior transplants. In this review we analyze the latest literature in detail and discuss the definition, natural history, pathophysiology, alloantigen dependent and independent factors that play a crucial role in CAN and the potential newer therapeutic targets on the horizon. This article highlights the importance of early identification and careful management of all the potential contributing factors with particular emphasis on prevention rather than cure of CAN as the core management strategy.     

Chronic allograft nephropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic allograft nephropathy is the major cause of late renal allograft loss. This disease is heterogeneous and the diagnosis is nonspecific, with both immune and nonimmune causes. Increasingly, we are able to recognize specific contributors to the disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Further understanding of chronic allograft nephropathy comes from a large study detailing the natural history of the disease, from protocol biopsies revealing subclinical cellular rejection, and from studies using C4d staining to distinguish antibody-mediated chronic rejection from nonspecific causes. Also made more clear are nonimmune mechanisms of chronic allograft nephropathy, such as the effect of decreased dosing of calcineurin inhibitors, and the concept of senescence as a mechanism of the disease. SUMMARY: Chronic allograft nephropathy is a heterogeneous disease with immune and nonimmune causes. Some features recognizable by histology and detected by other laboratory tests can help to categorize specific causes of the disease in particular cases. In addition, recent studies have contributed to our knowledge of the pathogenesis of the disease. In order to advance our understanding, we must be able to distinguish the various recognizable causes of chronic allograft dysfunction. Further research is warranted on the subset of the disease with indeterminate cause.     

Chronic renal allograft nephropathy

Chronic rejection/chronic allograft nephropathy is the most prevalent cause of renal graft loss after the first year post-transplant. Chronic rejection/chronic allograft nephropathy is characterized by a slow progressive deterioration of graft function, often in combination with proteinuria and hypertension. Both immunologic and non-immunologic factors play key roles in the pathogenesis of chronic allograft nephropathy. Acute rejection episodes are the most prevalent risk factor for chronic rejection. Many risk factors for chronic allograft nephropathy have been identified, such as delayed graft function, nephron-dosing mismatch, repeated acute rejection episodes, and pathologically severe rejection. However, the precise pathogenesis of chronic allograft nephropathy remains elusive. The differential diagnosis of immunologically mediated chronic rejection and chronic rejection caused by non-immunologic factors is usually not possible using clinical parameters. The histopathologic findings of chronic allograft nephropathy are progressive interstitial fibrosis and remodelling of the vascular wall, and these findings are nonspecific. However, typical chronic transplant glomerulopathy, which affects glomerular tufts, as well as the multilayering of the peritubular capillary basement membrane, are characteristic of immunologic chronic rejection. Furthermore, in long-surviving patient with an allograft treated with a potent immunosuppressive agent, a calcineurin inhibitor, two or more concomitant independent lesions often develop. Therefore, the term "chronic allograft nephropathy" may be clinically preferable to "chronic rejection" to describe the gradual decline in graft function months or years after transplantation, in the absence of a well defined mechanism of graft dysfunction. The most effective way to prevent chronic allograft nephropathy is to avoid any kind of graft damage via either immunologic or non-immunologic mechanisms. Received: April 1, 2000 / Accepted: May 2, 2000     

Chronic allograft nephropathy: An update.

Chronic allograft nephropathy is the most prevalent cause of renal transplant failure in the first post-transplant decade, but its pathogenesis has remained elusive. Clinically, it is characterized by a slow but variable loss of function, often in combination with proteinuria and hypertension. The histopathology is also not specific, but transplant glomerulopathy and multilayering of the peritubular capillaries are highly characteristic. Several risk factors have been identified, such as advanced donor age, delayed graft function, repeated acute rejection episodes, vascular rejection episodes, and rejections that occur late after transplantation. A common feature of chronic allograft nephropathy is that it develops in grafts that have undergone previous damage, although the mechanism(s) responsible for the progressive fibrosis and tissue remodeling has not yet been defined. Hypotheses to explain chronic allograft nephropathy include the immunolymphatic theory, the cytokine excess theory, the loss of supporting architecture theory, and the premature senescence theory. The most effective option to prevent chronic allograft nephropathy is to avoid graft injury from both immune and nonimmune mechanisms.     

Chronic allograft nephropathy and nephrotic range proteinuria

While the association between post-transplant nephrotic range proteinuria (PTx-NP) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) has been described, the factors that determine graft survival in such patients are unclear. We retrospectively identified 30 patients with biopsy-proven CAN who presented with PTX-NP between 1988 and 2002. Patients were stratified into two groups according to PTX-NP onset: <1 yr vs. >1 yr post-transplantation. Both groups were comparable with respect to the degree of renal dysfunction (serum creatinine 4.3 +/- 2.5 mg/dL vs. 3.4 +/- 1.5 mg/dL) and proteinuria (4.7 +/- 1.6 gm/d vs. 5.8 +/- 3 gm/d). After a mean follow-up of 14 months post-biopsy, 87% of patients had lost their grafts in both groups (89% vs. 83%, p = NS). Overall, patients with serum creatinine 2 mg/dL (75% vs. 4%, Fisher Exact Probability p = 0.0038). Using Kaplan-Meier estimate, the 5-yr graft survival rate was 100% for patients with serum creatinine 2 mg/dL (p = 0.06). The magnitude of proteinuria beyond 3 gm/d did not influence graft survival. One-half of the patients (n = 15) received therapy with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI). Graft survival, however, was not different between the patients who received ACEI compared with the patients who did not receive ACEI (13% vs. 13%). PTx-NP related to CAN was associated with poor allograft survival, irrespective of the time of onset of presentation, especially when renal function was reduced at the time of biopsy.     

Chronic allograft nephropathy in paediatric renal transplantation

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is now the leading cause of renal transplant loss in paediatric transplant recipients. Despite improvements in immunosuppression, which have significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection, the rates of chronic kidney loss have remained unchanged in paediatric transplant patients over the last 20 years. Chronic allograft nephropathy is a pathological diagnosis of which the key features are tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis. More consistent definitions and grading of these through the Banff classification have allowed more rigorous study of the development of chronic allograft nephropathy along with further identification of specific lesions associated with the underlying aetiologies. While initially thought to be primarily due to immune injury, it is now evident that CAN is the end result of a variety of immune and non-immune injuries including ischaemia reperfusion injury, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity and infections. Protocol biopsy studies have demonstrated rates of CAN development in children similar to those in adults with comparable underlying pathological processes. This review outlines the current knowledge of CAN within the context of paediatric renal transplantation.     

肾移植受者巨细胞病毒感染与慢性移植物肾病

目的　探讨肾移植术后早期巨细胞病毒 (CMV)感染与慢性移植物肾病 (CAN)的关系。　方法　 1999年 8月至 2 0 0 0年 12月行肾移植并随访 3年的患者 77例 ,根据术后 6个月内外周血CMV pp6 5 ( )白细胞计数的数量和持续时间 ,将其分为 :非活动性 (A组 ,n =15 )、低活动性 (B组 ,n=32 )、短期高活动性 (C组 ,n =18)和长期高活动性 (D组 ,n =12 )CMV感染 4组。 6个月后行移植肾穿剌活检 ,通过免疫荧光和逆转录聚合酶链反应 (RT PCR)比较 4组患者肾组织中转移生长因子β1(TGF β1)蛋白和mRNA的表达量 ;3年后比较 4组患者肾功能不全 (血肌酐持续 >114 μmol/L)的发生率和肌酐清除率 (Ccr)减损量 ;对肾功能不全的患者通过活检明确是否为CAN。　结果　肾移植 6个月后A、B、C组TGF β1蛋白表达量分别为 :( 5 .82± 1.32 )× 10 6、( 6 .34± 1.4 7)× 10 6和 ( 6 .5 8± 1.4 4 )× 10 6,TGF β1mRNA分别为 :0 .84± 0 .17、0 .78± 0 .15和 0 .82± 0 .16 ;D组TGF β1蛋白和mRNA表达量分别为 ( 10 .4 7± 2 .12 )× 10 6和 1.37± 0 .2 5 ,均明显高于前 3组 (P <0 .0 1)。前 3组 3年内Ccr减损量分别为 :( 5 .6± 5 .2 )、( 6 .2± 6 .4 )和 ( 5 .9± 4 .7)ml/min ;D组为 ( 15 .8± 9.6 )ml/min ,明显高于前 3组     

Chronic allograft nephropathy: its diagnosis and treatment

The process of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is primarily concerned with disparity in major histocompatibility. However, changes similar to CAN have been seen in human kidney transplants between identical twins, as well as in rat kidney isografts. Such changes cannot be explained by antigen-dependent factors; antigen-independent factors are likely to be involved in the onset of CAN. A CAN-type picture also was seen in a rat single kidney model subjected to ischemic injury, indicating the importance of ischemia in the process of CAN. In the present study, CAN was accelerated by renal ablation in a rat kidney transplant model with reduced nephron number. Conversely, recipients with increased renal mass bearing two allografts, did not show any signs of CAN. These observations suggested that a non-allogenic factor such as ischemia and insufficient nephron number is critical in the development of CAN, and thus the etiology of CAN is hypothesized as follows. Many factors such as ischemic injury, acute rejection or infection reduce the functioning nephron number, which causes hyperfiltration in remaining nephrons leading to glomerulosclerosis. This in turn, further reduces the functioning nephron number. These progressive events may reinforce further the stimulus of hyperfiltration, thereby establishing a self-sustaining vicious cycle. Any factor preventing the reduction of functioning nephron number, can be a candidate for treatment. Herein, we showed that treatment with hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), a renotropic factor, in the initial disease stage prevented further development of CAN.     

Chronic allograft nephropathy: current concepts and future directions

The paradigm that chronic rejection causes all progressive late allograft failure has been replaced by a hypothesis of cumulative damage, where a series of time-dependent immune and nonimmune mechanisms injure the kidney and lead to chronic interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, representing a final common pathway of injury and its consequent fibrotic healing response. Allograft damage is common, progressive, time-dependent, clinically important and modified by immunosuppression. Early after transplantation, tubulointerstitial damage is predominantly related to ischemia reperfusion injury, acute tubular necrosis, acute and subclinical rejection and/or calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, superimposed on preexisting donor disease. Later, cellular inflammation lessens and is replaced by microvascular and glomerular injury from calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, hypertension, immune-mediated fibrointimal vascular hyperplasia, transplant glomerulopathy and capillary injury, polyoma virus and/or recurrent glomerulonephritis. Additional mechanisms of injury include internal architectural disruption of the kidney, cortical ischemia, persistent chronic inflammation, replicative senescence, cytokine excess and fibrosis induced by epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Current understanding of the etiology, pathophysiology and evolution of pathological changes are detailed. An approach to histological assessment of the individual failing graft are presented and a series of postulates are defined for future studies of chronic allograft nephropathy.     

Chronic allograft nephropathy score before sirolimus rescue predicts allograft function in renal transplant patients

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is a major indication for initiation of sirolimus (SRL) in renal transplantation (TX) to prevent deterioration of renal function. We evaluated whether the CAN score at time of sirolimus rescue (SRL-R) predicts renal allograft function. CAN score is the sum of the following 4 categories: glomerulopathy (cg, 0-3), interstitial fibrosis (ci, 0-3), tubular atrophy (ct, 0-3), and vasculopathy (cv, 0-3). This is a retrospective cohort study of renal transplant recipients from July 2001 to March 2004. Immunosuppression consisted of preconditioning with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab and maintenance with tacrolimus (TAC) monotherapy with spaced weaning, if applicable, SRL-R was achieved by conversion from TAC, or by addition to reduced doses of TAC. Ninety patients received SRL. Thirty-three of these patients met the inclusion criteria of the following: (1) receipt of SRL for >6 months, and (2) follow-up of > or =6 months. There were 16 patients in the low-CAN (0-4) group and 17 patients in the high-CAN (>4) group. Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated at SRL-R and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The DeltaGFR was significantly better in the low-CAN group at 1, 3, and 6 months. A trend toward an improved DeltaGFR was present at 12 months in the low-CAN group (P = .16). CAN scoring at the time of SRL-R predicts recovery of renal allograft function (as measured using DeltaGFR), and should be used in preference to biochemical markers (Cr and C-G GFR), which may not be reliable predictors.     

Chronic allograft nephropathy and mycophenolate mofetil introduction in paediatric renal recipients

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) introduction with concurrent reduction in calcineurin inhibitors has been shown to be beneficial in chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in adults. MMF was introduced to 19 children with CAN 26.3±5.8 (range 3.1–82.6) months after transplantation. Patients were followed up for a mean of 13.2±2.9 (range 1.2–51.1) months. The mean initial MMF dose was 660±56 mg/m² per day, increased to 1,042±73 mg/m² per day a year later. Cyclosporin was reduced from 138±10 mg/m² per day at MMF introduction, to 116±15 mg/m² per day at 6 months and 107±24 mg/m² per day at 1 year. Six months prior to MMF introduction GFR deteriorated by –32.7±7.3 ml/min per 1.73m² per year. Six months after the introduction of MMF, GFR improved by +26.2±7.1 ml/min per 1.73m² per year (P <0.001). The introduction of MMF significantly reduced both the graft rejection rate (P=0.01) and systolic blood pressure (P=0.01), without a significant change in antihypertensive treatment. Haematological parameters did not significantly differ before and after MMF introduction. The introduction of MMF in paediatric renal transplant recipients with CAN may cause a significant improvement in GFR in both the short-term and the long-term and may well have a beneficial effect on systolic blood pressure. MMF has the potential to enable CNI-sparing protocols to be adopted.Preliminary results of this study were presented at the 7th Annual Congress of the British Transplantation Society, 2004, Birmingham, UK, and at the 13th Congress of the Internal Pediatric Nephrology Association, 2004, Adelaide, Australia     

Chronic allograft nephropathy: pathogenesis and management of an important posttransplant complication

Chronic allograft nephropathy is a devastating complication of kidney transplantation that is responsible for a significant proportion of graft loss. This complication is characterized by a progressive decline in kidney function, which is not attributable to a specific cause. Many risk factors exist for the development of chronic allograft nephropathy, including donor-, recipient-, and transplant-related factors (eg, use of calcineurin inhibitors and acute rejection episodes), as well as comorbid conditions such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia. There is no definitive treatment for this complication; management has focused on minimization or withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors in conjunction with addition of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil. Alterations in the immunosuppressive regimen must be done cautiously, as precipitating acute rejection will cause further damage to the allograft. Optimal control of blood pressure, particularly with the use of agents such as angiotensin II receptor blockers, in conjunction with management of dyslipidemia may be effective concurrent therapies in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy.     

Chronic allograft nephropathy: expression and localization of PAI-1 and PPAR-gamma.

BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is a major cause of loss of renal allografts. Mechanisms postulated to be involved include sequelae of rejection, warm ischaemia time, drug toxicity, ongoing hypertension and dyslipidaemia. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is implicated not only in thrombosis, but also in fibrosis, by inhibiting matrix degradation, and is expressed in renal parenchymal cells as well as in macrophages. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) is a member of the steroid receptor superfamily, and plays a major beneficial role in lipid regulation, insulin sensitivity and macrophage function, factors that may play a role in CAN. We therefore studied the expression of these molecules in CAN. METHODS: All renal biopsy/nephrectomy files from Vanderbilt and Nashville VAMC from a 6 year period were reviewed to identify all renal transplant biopsies or nephrectomies more than 6 months after transplant with CAN. CAN was defined as fibrosis in the graft, vascular, interstitial or glomerular. All cases were scored for severity of fibrosis in vasculature (0-3 scale), glomeruli (% affected with either segmental and/or global sclerosis) and interstitial fibrosis (% of sample affected). PAI-1 and PPAR-gamma immunostaining was assessed on a 0-3 scale in glomeruli, vessels and tubules. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients with a total of 106 samples met entry criteria. The population consisted of 59 Caucasians and 23 African-Americans; 49 males, 33 females with average age 37.9+/-1.7 years. Average time after transplant at time of biopsy was 60.5+/-4.9 months (range 7-229). Glomerulosclerosis extent in CAN was on average 26.5+/-2.4% compared with 3.6+/-1.2% in normal control kidneys from native kidney cancer nephrectomies and 0% in transplanted kidney biopsies from patients obtained > or =6 months after transplantation without CAN. Native control kidneys showed mild interstitial fibrosis (8.0+/-1.2%), whereas transplant controls showed very minimal fibrosis (2.0+/-2.0%). Interstitial fibrosis in CAN kidneys was on average 47.9+/-2.4%. Glomerular PAI-1 and PPAR-gamma staining scores were markedly increased in CAN (1.8+/-0.1, 2.3+/-0.1, respectively) compared with normal control kidneys from native kidney cancer nephrectomies (PAI-1 0.2+/-0.2 and PPAR-gamma 0.4+/-0.2, P<0.001) and transplanted kidney biopsies from patients obtained > or =6 months after transplantation without CAN (PAI-1 0 and PPAR-gamma 0, P<0.001). Tubular PAI-1 and PPAR-gamma staining scores were 1.9+/-0.1 and 1.9+/-0.1, respectively, and also increased over both native and transplant kidney controls (0.8+/-0.2 for both categories for PAI-1, 1.2+/-0.2 for both categories for PPAR-gamma, respectively). Vascular sclerosis in CAN was 1.0+/-0.1 with increased PAI-1 and PPAR-gamma scores (1.7+/-0.1, 1.2+/-0.1, respectively) compared with controls. Infiltrating macrophages were increased in CAN, and were positive for both PAI-1 and PPAR-gamma. Biopsies with less sclerosis overall showed a trend for less PAI-1 and PPAR-gamma staining. CONCLUSION: PAI-1 and PPAR-gamma are both increased in CAN compared with non-scarred native or transplant control kidneys. We speculate that altered matrix metabolism and macrophage function might be involved in the development of CAN.     

Sirolimus in chronic allograft nephropathy

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is the most common cause of late renal transplant loss. Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity is known to contribute to CAN. A sirolimus-based regimen way allow for early CNI reduction or elimination. The aim of the present study was to determine the efficacy and safety of a sirolimus-based regimen for CAN. From December 2001 to August 2003, kidney transplant (KTx) recipients with CAN were enrolled for treatment with sirolimus. Among 32 studied patients, 24 (75%) underwent graft biopsy before the initiation of sirolimus. Baseline maintenance immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine/tacrolimus and prednisone with or without mycophenolate mofetil. The follow-up duration on sirolimus therapy was 8.5 +/- 5.9 months (range: 1 to 22 months). The average dosage of sirolimus was 1.8 +/- 0.5 mg/d at the end of follow-up. The mean trough level of sirolimus was 5.1 +/- 2.1 ng/mL. Sirolimus was effective in 16 (50%) patients while 3 (9.4%) patients improved (serum creatinine [Cr] decrease > 10%) and 13 (40.6%) maintained stable (change of serum Cr within 10%). Sirolimus was effective in 5 (35.7%) patients whose serum Cr was over 3.0 mg/dL but failed to rescue all four patients whose serum Cr was over 4.0 mg/dL. Eleven (68.8%) of 16 responders showed a reduction (29.8% +/- 13.8%) in CNI dosage. The most common adverse events were hyperlipidemia (37.5%), anemia (25%), and diarrhea (21.8%). Twelve patients discontinued sirolimus due to graft failure (4), severe infection (3), stroke related mortality (1), anemia (2), diarrhea (1), and edema (1). In conclusion, sirolimus is effective in 50% of KTx recipients with CAN, especially when the serum Cr is less than 3.0 mg/dL. However, the increased incidence of infection, diarrhea, and hyperlipidemia are of major concern.     

Chronic allograft nephropathy in athymic nude rats after adoptive transfer of primed T lymphocytes

The impact of presensitized T lymphocytes on the development of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) was investigated in nude athymic LEW.RNU recipients of F344 renal allografts. The recipients (n = 8) were reconstituted with 5 x 10(7) T lymphocytes primed against donor skin grafts to induce graft rejection. LEW.RNU (n = 8) and euthymic LEW recipients (n = 6) which underwent no further intervention after transplantation served as control groups. Adoptive transfer of primed T cells induced CAN in LEW.RNU rats. Their kidney function decreased progressively. After 90 days a moderate glomerulopathy, tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis were observed, vascular changes were only mild or absent. Cellular infiltrates were predominated by CD4+ T cells and ED1+ macrophages. Deposition of tenascin and laminin was enhanced. Grafts of euthymic recipients displayed only mild signs of CAN according to the Banff criteria. These data implicate an important role for the cellular immune response in the development of CAN.