Predictors of prostate cancer on repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the outcome of repeated transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic prostate biopsy in Japanese men whose clinical findings were suspected of prostate cancer after previous negative biopsies. METHODS: Between January 1993 and March 2002, 1045 patients underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Among them, 104 patients underwent repeat biopsy due to indications of persistent elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) or TRUS, increased PSA velocity, and/or previous suspicious biopsy findings. Several clinicopathological factors were evaluated for their ability to predict the detection of prostate cancer on repeat biopsy. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was detected in 22 of 104 patients (21.2%) who underwent repeat biopsies. PSA concentration and PSA density at both the initial and repeat biopsies, and PSA velocity in men with positive repeat biopsy were significantly greater than those in men with negative repeat biopsy. The incidence of abnormal findings in DRE and TRUS at initial biopsy in men with positive repeat biopsy was also significantly higher than that in men with negative repeat biopsy. However, neither the presence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia nor number of biopsy cores at initial biopsy had a significant association with the results of the repeat biopsy. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that PSA and PSA density at both the initial and repeat biopsies, PSA velocity, and DRE and TRUS findings at initial biopsy were independent predictors of malignant disease on repeat biopsy. CONCLUSION: Despite an initial negative biopsy, repeat TRUS-guided biopsy should be carried out to exclude prostate cancer in cases of suspicious clinical findings, such as elevated PSA or PSA-related parameters, or abnormal findings of DRE or TRUS.     

Community‐based prostate cancer screening in Japan: Predicting factors for positive repeat biopsy

Objectives: To assess possible predictors in determining criteria for repeat biopsy in a prostate cancer screening population. Methods: A total of 50 207 men over 55 years‐of‐age have participated in a prostate cancer screening program in Otokuni, Kyoto, Japan for 12 years. Transperineal systematic biopsy was carried out in case of positive digital rectal examination (DRE) or positive transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) or a prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) value greater than 10.0 ng/mL. For those with a PSA level from 4.1 to 10.0 ng/mL, and negative DRE and TRUS findings, biopsy was indicated only when PSA density (PSAD) was greater than 0.15. The same indication was applied for the repeat biopsy. Results: A repeat biopsy after an interval of more than 2 years was carried out in 140 patients and was positive in 50 (36%) patients. The PSA value at the diagnosis of cancer declined from the initial value in six (12%) patients. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, PSA velocity (PSAV) as well as PSAD and DRE findings at latest screening were independent predictors for positive repeat‐biopsy outcome. The odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) of PSAV >0.48, latest PSAD >0.33 and positive latest DRE were 4.17 (1.05–18.5), 4.15 (1.31–14.0), and 3.62 (1.06–13.2), respectively. A combination of three variables defined as positive if any of these were positive, reduced 31% of unnecessary biopsies while missing 8% of low volume, low grade cancers. Conclusions: A combination of latest PSAD, PSAV and positive DRE at latest screening might help to reduce unnecessary repeat biopsies in high‐risk patients with an initial negative biopsy.     

常规临床检查与PSA灰区患者前列腺癌检出率的关系

目的:探讨直肠指检(DRE)、影像学(TRUS、MRI)检查、血清游离与总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)比值(f/t)与PSA在4～10μg/L之间患者前列腺癌检出率的关系。方法:回顾性分析365例PSA处于灰区的患者进行DRE、TRUS、MRI检查、游离PSA测定,并对这些患者行经直肠B超引导下的前列腺穿刺活检。评估其临床资料与前列腺穿刺病理结果的关系。结果:在365例患者中,穿刺病理为前列腺癌的患者共有87例(23.84%)。DRE阳性的患者共有128例,穿刺阳性40例,阳性率为31.25%,TRUS检查的患者共有257例,其中有异常回声结节的69例患者中穿刺阳性26例,阳性率为37.68%,MRI检查的患者共有191例,其中有异常信号结节的107例患者中穿刺阳性59例,阳性率为55.14%。198例患者行fPSA与tPSA比值分析,其中前列腺癌患者的平均f/t PSA明显低于穿刺阴性患者。f/t PSA受试者曲线(ROC)下的面积(0.725)高于患者PSA ROC的面积(0.542)。结论:结合临床DRE、影像学资料及f/t PSA比值可以有效提高前列腺癌检出率,从而减少不必要的穿刺给患者带来的痛苦。     

Examination for indication of systematic biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer]

BACKGROUND: Systematic biopsy has been commonly used for detection of prostate cancer. Nevertheless, as this examination occasionally gives patients severe complications it is necessary to give careful consideration for application of this examination. Thus, we analyzed retrospectively 145 cases who underwent transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) guided systematic biopsy to evaluate the application of systematic biopsy, correlating with the findings of digital rectal examination (DRE), prostate specific antigen (PSA), the findings of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and the results of biopsies. METHODS: Between May, 1995 and May, 1997, 143 patients who were suspected to have prostate cancer with either of PSA and DRE, and 2 patients who received visual laser ablation of prostate (VLAP), underwent TRUS guided systematic biopsy of prostate. We evaluated diagnostic efficacy of PSA, DRE, TRUS, prostate-volume-specific PSA, and PSA density (PSAD). RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (P.P.V.) are 78.4%, 62.8% and 53.5% for DRE, 100.0%, 4.4% and 41.8% for PSA, 88.2%, 60.0% and 52.9% for TRUS, 87.8%, 72.1% and 64.2% for prostate-volume-specific PSA, 100.0%, 30.6% and 45.4% for PSAD, respectively. Ten of 69 patients (14.5%) whose PSA levels were 4.0 to 10.0 ng/ml were diagnosed as cancer, and positive for both or either of DRE and TRUS. Twenty-seven who were negative for both of DRE and TRUS were not diagnosed as prostate cancer. Using the combination of prostate-volume-specific PSA, DRE and TRUS, we could eliminate 29 non-cancer men (21.5%) whose PSA level was greater than 4.0 ng/ml from systematic biopsy. CONCLUSION: On the diagnosis of prostate cancer, the combination of prostate-volume-specific PSA, DRE and TRUS is very useful to exclude unnecessary systematic biopsy, if an urologist could be used to and trained for DRE and TRUS.     

Clinical, biochemical and pathological features of initial and repeat transrectal ultrasonography prostate biopsy positive patients

BACKGROUND: Using sextant biopsy, 16-41% of prostate cancers were diagnosed on repeat biopsy. The objective of the present study was to compare the differences in the clinical, biochemical and pathological features between patients with positive results on initial and repeat biopsies, with an aim to identify factors that can be used to improve the detection rate of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy of the prostate. METHODS: Between February 2000 and April 2001, 222 patients with a mean age of 64 years (range 38-85) underwent TRUS-guided 10-core prostate biopsy for either abnormal prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels (>4 ng/mL) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE). Of this number, 165 patients underwent their first biopsy, whereas 45 and 12 patients had had one or two previous biopsies, respectively. RESULTS: Prostate cancer detection rates for the initial biopsy group (n = 165), second biopsy group (n = 45) and third biopsy group (n = 12) were 29.7, 23.0 and 41.7%, respectively. Six patients who had a negative first 10-core biopsy underwent a second 10-core biopsy and one patient (16%) was found to have cancer. Apart from total prostate volume, there were no significant statistical differences between the patient age, mean total PSA, PSA density, PSA-transition zone density, DRE and TRUS findings between the initial and repeat biopsy groups of subjects who had cancer. Those who had cancer detected only on repeat biopsies had larger prostate glands (P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Patients who had cancer detected only on repeat biopsies had bigger prostate glands, supporting the hypothesis that TRUS sextant biopsy as a technique suffers the error of under-sampling in a bigger prostate.     

Detection of residual prostate cancer after radiotherapy by sonographically guided needle biopsy.

Detection of persistent or recurrent prostate cancer by digital rectal examination (DRE) after definitive radiotherapy is difficult. With the availability of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), the detection of prostate cancer has improved substantially. Since 1987 we have used TRUS to evaluate the prostate after definitive radiotherapy. A hypoechoic lesion suggestive of cancer was identified in 45 of 56 patients (80%) studied. Sonographically directed transrectal needle biopsies were performed in 27 of these (60%), and 16 (59%) were positive for cancer. The presence of a palpable nodule suggestive of cancer (present in 7 patients) was not predictive of a positive biopsy specimen. In 14 patients ultrasound-guided and digitally-guided biopsies were performed at the same time; 8 (57%) of the ultrasound-guided biopsy specimens were positive compared with only 4 (29%) of the digitally-guided biopsy specimens. In all 7 patients with an elevated serum level of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) an ultrasound-guided biopsy result was positive. Random biopsies of sonographically normal (isoechoic) areas of the prostate were performed in 8 patients, but only 2 specimens (25%) were positive for cancer. Ultrasound-guided transrectal biopsy of hypoechoic lesions was a safe and effective technique for identifying residual cancer in the irradiated prostate, regardless of the palpable findings. In the presence of an elevated PSA level, such biopsies invariably identified residual cancer. The use of TRUS, ultrasound-guided biopsy, and the measurement of PSA, in addition to DRE, may aid in the detection of residual cancer after definitive radiotherapy.     

累及移行带前列腺癌的诊断分析

目的分析累及移行带前列腺癌的临床特征,提高移行带前列腺癌的诊断率。方法回顾我院收治的77例前列腺癌患者,一组44例仅限于外周带;另一组33例已累及移行带。分析两组的临床表现、直肠指检、移行指数、前列腺移行带特异性抗原密度、前列腺特异性抗原、经直肠前列腺超声以及前列腺穿刺活检。结果两组患者的年龄、排尿期和储尿期症状、直肠指检阳性率、移行指数、前列腺移行带特异性抗原密度、前列腺特异性抗原以及病理分级没有显著性差异。移行带肿瘤存在泌尿系转移的风险。经直肠超声为移行带可疑病灶的定位提供了重要的参考,而对可疑病灶穿刺活检则能提高累及移行带前列腺癌的诊断率。结论经直肠超声行移行带可疑病灶的穿刺活检是诊断累及移行带前列腺癌的有效手段。     

Transrectal power Doppler imaging in the detection of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical utility of transrectal power Doppler imaging (PDI) of the prostate for detecting prostate cancer in patients with abnormally high serum levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (107) with abnormally high serum PSA levels were assessed using a digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and PDI. Any hypervascular lesion on PDI was graded on a scale of 0-3, where grade 1-3 was considered positive and grade 0 negative. Patients were then diagnosed by prostatic needle biopsy and the results compared with the other detection methods. RESULTS: Needle biopsy confirmed prostate cancer in 41 (24%) of the 170 patients. PDI was positive in 68, of whom 40 (59%) had prostate cancer; all those but one having prostate cancer were positive on PDI. Thus, PDI had a high sensitivity of 98% (40/41) and a negative predictive value of 99% (101/102). PDI could have saved a significant number of patients from undergoing unnecessary biopsies, compared with DRE and TRUS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of PDI in detecting prostate cancer might reduce the number of unnecessary needle biopsies of the prostate in patients with abnormally high serum PSA levels.     

Volume-adjusted prostate-specific antigen (PSA) variables in detecting impalpable prostate cancer in men with PSA levels of 2-4 ng/mL: transabdominal measurement makes a significant contribution

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels adjusted according to prostate volume improve prostate cancer detection using transrected biopsies in men with PSA levels of 2-4 ng/mL, and benign findings on a digital rectal examination (DRE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men aged < or = 79 years and with serum PSA levels of 2-4 ng/mL and normal DRE findings were prospectively enrolled. Eligible patients were recommended for transrectal prostate biopsies after measuring prostate volumes with transrectal (TRUS) and transabdominal (TAUS) ultrasonography, and transition zone volumes with TRUS. In addition to PSA levels and the free-to-total PSA ratio, volume-adjusted PSA levels, PSA densities determined by TRUS (PSAD(TRUS)), and TAUS (PSAD(TAUS)), and PSA transition zone densities (PSATzD) were compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 31 (22%) of the 139 men who had prostate biopsies. The area under the curve (AUC) of PSAD(TRUS) (0.796) and PSATzD (0.792) was similar and significantly greater than that of PSA (AUC 0.588) and the free-to-total PSA ratio (AUC 0.658). PSAD(TAUS) was a significantly better indicator of prostate cancer than PSA levels alone (P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: As predictors of prostate cancer, there were no significant differences between PSAD(TRUS) and PSATzD. Although PSAD(TAUS) was worse than PSA variables adjusted by total and transition zone prostate volumes determined by TRUS, it was a better predictor than the PSA value alone in men with a low PSA level. These results indicate that TAUS is worthwhile where the routine use of TRUS before biopsy is difficult.     

USEFULNESS OF DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION, SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, TRANSRECTAL ULTRAS ONOGRAPHY AND SYSTEMATIC PROSTATE BIOPSY FOR THE DETECTION OF ORGAN-CONFINED PROSTATE CANCER

The detection rate of organ-confined prostate cancer by digital rectal examination (DRE), serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) of the prostate, as well as the value of a directed, guided transrectal core biopsy for the prostate (TRUS-guided biopsy) combined with systematic biopsy, were evaluated. The subjects were 171 patients with urinary symptoms suggestive of prostatic disease excluding those with clinical stage C and D prostate cancer. Twenty-five patients (14.6%) had prostate cancer, 127 (74.2%) had benign prostate hypertrophy, four (2.3%) had prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, eleven (6.4%) had inflammation, and four (2.3%) had normal prostate tissue. The incidence of detection of hypoechoic findings by TRUS in the patients in whom nodules were detected by DRE or who had elevated serum PSA was higher than that in patients with negative diagnostic findings. In 22 of the 25 patients with prostate cancer, the cancer was detected by recognition of a hypoechoic area on TRUS. In 10 of these 22 patients, prostate cancer was also detected by systematic biopsy in isoechoic areas. Prostate cancer was detected by systematic biopsy in three patients without hypoechoic findings. The positive predictive value for patients with abnormal findings on all three tests was 64.3%, which is significantly higher than that for patients with any other combination of findings (p < 0.05). Our results indicate that the combination of DRE, serum PSA and TRUS is useful for the detection of organ-confined prostate cancer, and that TRUS and TRUS-guided prostate biopsy combined with systematic biopsy should be performed in patients with abnormal findings for both DRE and PSA. Our results also demonstrate that systematic biopsy is useful for the detention of prostate cancer from the isoechoic area visualized by TRUS.     

Comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging, guided prostate biopsy and digital rectal examination in the preoperative anatomical localization of prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We compared the accuracy of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (erMRI), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy and digital rectal examination (DRE) for detecting the location of cancer in the prostate gland and seminal vesicles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 106 consecutive patients with prostate cancer who were referred for erMRI before radical prostatectomy. Step-section pathological data and erMRI were available in 90 patients, DRE data were available on 86 and individually labeled sextant core biopsies were available in 45. T1 and T2-weighted erMRI was interpreted by a single reader, who scored the likelihood of tumor on a 5-point scale in each seminal vesicle and in 12 locations in the prostate gland. MR spectroscopy data were not used for erMRI interpretation. One pathologist reviewed whole mount serial sections of radical prostatectomy specimens. The area under ROC curves was used to evaluate accuracy. RESULTS: The area under ROC curves for tumor localization was higher for erMRI than for DRE at the prostatic apex (0.72 vs 0.66), mid gland (0.80 vs 0.69) and base (0.83 vs 0.69). It was likewise higher for erMRI than for TRUS biopsy in the mid gland (0.75 vs 0.68) and base (0.81 vs 0.61) but not in the apex (0.67 vs 0.70). On mixed model analysis erMRI significantly increased the accuracy of prostate cancer localization by DRE or TRUS biopsy (each p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: For prostate cancer localization erMRI contributes significant incremental value to DRE or TRUS biopsy findings (each p <0.0001).     

Potential predictive factors of positive prostate biopsy in the Japanese population

Introduction There are numerous arguments for the predictive factors of positive prostate biopsies, differing according to race and region. This study aimed to determine predictive factors for a positive prostate biopsy in East Asian, especially Japanese men, using clinical, laboratory, and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) findings. Methods Data were collected from 466 men who underwent a prostate biopsy for suspected prostate cancer. Variables analyzed including age, digital rectal examination (DRE) findings, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA density, prostate volume, and TRUS findings. Logistic regression analysis and the Mann–Whitney U test were used for this study. Results Logistic regression analysis showed that significant predictors for a positive prostate biopsy for all patients were positive DRE results, prostate volume, and hypoechoic lesions on TRUS. Especially in the patients with PSA levels <10 ng/ml, the significant predictor for positive biopsy was prostate volume. The Mann–Whitney U test showed that significant predictors for a positive prostate biopsy in all patients were PSA density >0.15, positive DRE results, and prostate volume <25 cm³. Especially in patients with PSA levels <10 ng/ml, significant predictors for a positive prostate biopsy were prostate volume <25 cm³ and PSA density >0.15. Additionally, even if the data were confined to those patients with seven or more core biopsies, all the predictive factors shown in all patients were significant predictors in this category. Conclusion This study investigated potential predictors for positive prostate biopsy and demonstrated that prostate volume was an independent predictive factor for positive prostate biopsy in patients with PSA levels <10 ng/ml. In the future, we may be able to use our findings to create a nomogram for predicting positive prostate biopsy in Japanese men.     

Impact of high‐consistency area evaluated under hand‐operated transrectal compression using a sonographic probe on prostate cancer detection: Clinicopathological analysis

Aim of this investigation was to determine whether the evaluation of a new dynamic finding on conventional greyscale transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), which we named as high‐consistency area (HCA), is useful in detection of prostate cancer (PCa). Fifty‐one consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. When TRUS‐guided prostate biopsy was performed, HCA that was difficult to transform, due to transrectal compression using sonographic probe, was evaluated. HCA‐targeting biopsy, digital rectal examination (DRE)‐targeting biopsy and systematic 12‐core biopsy were performed. All biopsy cores were diagnosed histopathologically. As the results, twenty‐three PCas were detected in 51 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of HCA‐targeting biopsy for correct diagnosis were 60.9% and 78.6%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for DRE‐targeting biopsy were 47.8% and 78.6%, respectively. In conclusion, HCA‐targeting biopsy of this study was superior to DRE‐targeting biopsy with regard to detection of PCa. Before prostate biopsy, patients should be evaluated for DRE and HCA, and DRE and HCA‐targeting biopsy should be performed.     

建立预测中国人前列腺重复穿刺活检阳性的数学模型

目的:建立可以预测国人经直肠超声引导下重复穿刺活检阳性的数学模型。方法:170例在首次穿刺活检诊断为前列腺良性病变的患者行重复穿刺。记录并分析患者的年龄、前列腺体积、血清PSA、游离PSA(f-PSA)/总PSA(t-PSA)、PSA上升速度、PSA密度(PSAD)、直肠指检(DRE)、首次穿刺病理结果等相关因素。将变量通过逐步回归建立回归方程,在此基础上建立重复穿刺活检阳性的危险评分数学模型。该模型的预测价值通过受试者工作曲线下面积来评估。结果:170例前列腺重复穿刺活检的患者中,前列腺癌的穿刺检出率为31.8%(54/170)。建立的数学模型影响因素包括:患者的年龄、前列腺体积、PSA、f-PSA/t-PSA、PSA上升速度、PSAD、DRE、首次穿刺结果是否为上皮内瘤变。该模型预测价值较高,曲线下面积为82.4%,大于患者PSAD、前列腺体积、PSA上升速度、f-PSA/t-PSA、DRE等单因素的66.9%、72.6%、69.6%、69.3%、58.5%。结论:该数学模型是临床多因素综合分析基础上建立的,可以很好地预测前列腺重复穿刺活检阳性的概率。     

以前列腺特异抗原水平分组筛查与前列腺穿刺阳性率的关系

目的探讨不同血清前列腺特异抗原(PSA)水平前列腺癌检出情况以及直肠指诊(DRE)、经直肠超声检查(TRUS)、PSA密度(PSAD)等指标对筛查前列腺穿刺活检病例的意义。方法回顾性分析在1996年4月至2002年12月间行TRUS引导前列腺6点系统穿刺活检的634例患者的诊断资料,对各PSA组(≤4.0,4.1~,10.1~和>20.0μg/L组)中前列腺癌的检出率,以及PSA、DRE、TRUS、PSAD等对前列腺癌的预测作用进行t检验、χ2检验和多因素Logistic回归分析。结果PSA≤4.0,4.1~,10.1~和>20.0μg/L各组的前列腺癌检出率分别为11.6%(17/146),26.8%(38/142),39.8%(68/171)和68.6%(120/175)。PSA的敏感性最高(93.0%),特异性低(33.0%);DRE、TRUS等诊断效率较低。随血清PSA水平升高,前列腺癌检出率以及DRE、TRUS的阳性预测值逐渐升高;在PSA4.1~20.0μg/L者中,PSAD对前列腺癌有较大的预测价值(OR=687.09±646.96,P=0.000)。以PSAD≥0.13μg.L-1.cm-3为截点筛查前列腺穿刺病例,可在不明显降低敏感性的基础上,减少阴性穿刺。结论各PSA组国人与欧美等国前列腺癌检出率有较大差别;DRE、TRUS的筛查作用与血清PSA水平有关;按PSA水平分组筛查穿刺病例,可提高前列腺穿刺的阳性率。     

Is a digital rectal examination necessary in the diagnosis and clinical staging of early prostate cancer?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of a digital rectal examination (DRE) in the clinical diagnosis of prostate cancer and in predicting the pathological stage, as the diagnosis of early prostate cancer usually comprises prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, a DRE and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over the 4 years between 2000 and 2004, 408 consecutive patients (mean age 63.8 years) referred with age-specific PSA levels of 2.5-10.0 ng/mL and who had a TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy were included in the study. They had a DRE by either of two experienced consultant urologists. The results of the DRE and core biopsy histology were compared with the histology and the radical prostatectomy specimen in a subset (82 men) of the study population. RESULTS: Cancer was detected on biopsy in 152 patients; of the 196 with an abnormal DRE, 47% had cancer on biopsy. In the patients with a normal DRE, 59 cancers were detected. Men with cancer were older and had a higher median PSA level. There was no correlation between the DRE and biopsy findings, and none between an abnormal DRE and histological diagnosis of cancer. Of the patients who had a radical prostatectomy, 38% had a normal DRE. CONCLUSION: There was no correlation between the DRE, biopsy findings and pathological staging. The DRE did not contribute to managing patients with prostate cancer, but this does not mean that there is no longer a place for the DRE in assessing the urological patient. If patients are appropriately counselled before PSA testing, a DRE may not be essential for patients with a PSA level of 2.5-10 ng/mL.     

Can digital rectal examination or transrectal ultrasonography biopsy findings predict the side of nodal metastasis in prostate cancer?

PURPOSE: To assess the use of several preoperative parameters in predicting the side of pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review (January 1982 to February 2004) identified 106 men with pathology proven lymph node positive prostate cancer for whom complete medical records were available. RESULTS: The median serum prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis was 11 ng/ml with the clinical stage T1C in 9 patients, T2 in 68, and T3 in 29. The Gleason score on transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) biopsy was < or =6 in 13, 7 in 41, and > or =8 in 52. A total of 93 patients had documented pretreatment digital rectal examination (DRE) findings: 54 had a unilaterally suspicious DRE, and 31 had a bilaterally suspicious DRE. Of patients with a unilaterally positive DRE, 30 had ipsilateral lymph node metastasis, 16 contralateral, and 8 bilateral. DRE showed a 71% sensitivity and 29% false-negative rate in predicting the side of nodal metastasis. A total of 98 patients had documented TRUS biopsy findings: 37 had unilaterally positive TRUS biopsies and 61 bilaterally positive biopsies. Of patients with unilaterally positive TRUS biopsies, 20 had ipsilateral lymph node metastasis, 11 contralateral, and 6 bilateral. TRUS biopsies showed an 86% sensitivity and 14% false-negative rate in predicting the side of nodal metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: DRE and TRUS biopsies do not accurately predict the side of pelvic lymph node metastasis and should not determine the extent of the pelvic lymphadenectomy.     

Predictors for biopsy outcome in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (Rotterdam region).

BACKGROUND: In the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC, Rotterdam region), men aged 55-74 years are screened for prostate cancer by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) sampling, digital rectal examination (DRE), and transrectal ultrasound investigation (TRUS). All men with a PSA > or =4 ng/ml and/or a suspicious DRE and/or a suspicious TRUS are biopsied. METHODS: Logistic regression analysis was applied to derive a predictive index that equals the chance to find prostate cancer in a biopsy given the outcomes of the screening tests. This model was used to assess the number of cancers that could have been detected if all men had been biopsied (extrapolation). Furthermore, the model was used to study the possibilities for improvement of the current screening protocol. RESULTS: PSA was the dominant predictor for prostate cancer in a biopsy, followed by prostate volume, DRE, and TRUS result. It is assessed that 69% (95% CI, 52-86%) of cancers that could be identified if all men were biopsied are currently detected. Application of the same methods to screening data obtained in G?teborg (the Swedish ERSPC partner) yielded almost identical results. It was found that, in the Rotterdam protocol, a considerable number of men were biopsied according to the screening protocol with an assessed lower chance to have prostate cancer than men who were not biopsied according to the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: The chance to detect prostate cancer in a biopsy can be modeled quite accurately as a function of serum PSA, prostate volume, DRE, and TRUS results. Important improvements in the screening protocol can be achieved by the application of the predictive index.     

Outcome of laterally directed sextant biopsies of the prostate in screened males aged 50--66 years. Implications for sampling order.

OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer has its most frequent location in the posterior-lateral part of the gland. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cancer detection rate of six systemic prostate biopsies with mid lobar biopsies taken far laterally in the prostate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 692 patients (aged 50--66 years) enrolled in a screening study underwent prostate biopsies because of an elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA; > or =3 ng/ml) level. The outcome of the biopsies was related to findings at digital rectal examination (DRE) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and to the location within the prostate. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was detected in 164 patients. DRE and TRUS were suspicious of malignancy in 66 cases (40%) and 84 cases (51%), respectively. The two biopsies taken far laterally midlobar in the prostate detected as many as 83% of the cancers and when combined with two apical biopsies, 96% of all cancers were detected. CONCLUSION: At PSA screening in this age-group, only 57% of the prostate cancers detectable by sextant biopsies were palpable or visible at TRUS. Most of the cancers (96%) were detectable by only four systematic, carefully directed biopsies. In men with normal DRE, the two lateral midlobar biopsies should be taken first during the biopsy procedure.     

经直肠前列腺穿刺活检阳性率的相关影响因素分析

目的 分析经直肠前列腺穿刺活检前列腺癌阳性率的相关影响因素.方法 回顾性总结2011年6月至2014年6月间在本院行经直肠超声引导前列腺穿刺活检患者的临床病理资料.通过X2检验、多因素回归模型、受试者工作曲线等方法分析与前列腺癌阳性率相关的影响因素,并验证PAMD评分系统预测经直肠前列腺穿刺活检阳性率的可靠性.结果 入组222例患者中检出前列腺癌88例,阳性率39.6％.单因素分析显示,年龄(P＜0.05)、血清总PSA(TPSA) (P ＜0.001)、核磁共振成像(MRI) (P ＜0.001)、肛门指诊(DRE) (P ＜0.001)在前列腺癌组患者均存在显著差异.通过多元逻辑回归分析显示,年龄、TPSA、前列腺体积(PV)、MRI、DRE均是经直肠前列腺穿刺活检阳性率的独立影响因素,其优势比(OR)和95％可信区间(95％CI)分别为2.539(1.156 ～5.576)、2.745(1.677 ～4.494)、0.409(0.187 ～0.891)、0.132(0.039 ～0.446)和0.018(0.005～0.063).利用PV+ Age+ MRI+ DRE (PAMD)评分系统评价显示,≥4分高危组前列腺癌检出率可达48.2％,明显高于总体阳性率,与中、低危组相比有显著差异.结论 Age、TPSA、PV、MRI和DRE均可作为前列腺穿刺活检阳性率的独立影响因素,结合PAMD评分系统有助于提高前列腺穿刺活检的阳性率.