Effects of chloral hydrate on nitrous oxide sedation of children

This study was conducted to examine the effects of chloral hydrate on nitrous oxide sedation of young children for dental treatment. Nineteen children, ranging in age from 19 to 41 months (mean 30 months), participated in this double-blind study. The subjects were assigned randomly to receive either a placebo or chloral hydrate (50 mg/kg) for the first visit with the alternate regimen administered during the second appointment. In addition, all subjects received inhalation nitrous oxide/oxygen at a concentration of 50%, and were restrained in a Papoose board (Olympic Medical Group; Seattle, WA) with head restraint. Seventy-four per cent of sedations were classified as very good or excellent when chloral hydrate was administered with nitrous oxide compared with only 26% when the placebo was administered.     

Death after chloral hydrate sedation: report of case

A young healthy female died after taking chloral hydrate syrup before surgery to extract third molars. Various aspects of the use of chloral hydrate are discussed, including the metabolism, active moiety, reported side effects, and effects on the heart. Recommendations are made concerning patient supervision, dosage limitations, and degree of sedation.     

Conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients: an investigation of chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine pamoate, and meperidine vs. chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine pamoate

This study evaluated two oral sedative regimens for the conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients (mean age 37.0 months) unmanageable by traditional behavior management techniques. Regimen A included chloral hydrate (Noctec--E.R. Squibb and Sons, Princeton, NJ) at 50 mg/kg with 25 mg hydroxyzine pamoate (Vistaril--Pfizer Laboratories, New York, NY), plus meperidine (Demerol--Winthrop-Breon, New York, NY) at 1.5 mg/kg. Regimen B included chloral hydrate at 50 mg/kg with 25 mg hydroxyzine pamoate. In a crossover research design, 10 patients were assigned randomly to receive one regimen, to be followed by the alternative regimen during the second appointment. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if meperidine would improve patient behavior, and increase the prevalence of respiratory compromise. A secondary purpose of the study was to develop an objective method to assess behavior during the conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients. Results revealed that the addition of oral meperidine to chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine pamoate resulted in improved behavior (P less than 0.01) during local anesthetic injection, rubber dam delivery, and the operative dental procedure. There was no increase in the prevalence of respiratory compromise with the addition of meperidine.     

A randomized double-blinded trial of chloral hydrate with or without hydroxyzine versus placebo for pediatric dental sedation

Chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine are a drug combination frequently used by practitioners to sedate pediatric dental patients, but their effectiveness has not been compared to a negative control group in humans. The aim of this crossover, double-blinded study was to evaluate the effect of these drugs compared to a placebo, administered to young children for dental treatment. Thirty-five dental sedation sessions were carried out on 12 uncooperative ASA I children aged less than 5 years old. In each session patients were randomly assigned to groups P (placebo), CH (chloral hydrate 75 mg/kg) and CHH (chloral hydrate 50 mg/kg plus hydroxyzine 2.0 mg/kg). Vital signs and behavioral variables were evaluated every 15 min. Comparisons were statistically analyzed using Friedman and Wilcoxon tests. P, CH and CHH had no differences concerning vital signs, except for breathing rate. All vital signs were in the normal range. CH and CHH promoted more sleep in the first 30 min of treatment. Overall behavior was better in CH and CHH than in P. CH, CHH and P were effective in 62.5%, 61.5% and 11.1% of the cases, respectively. Chloral hydrate was safe and relatively effective, causing more satisfactory behavioral and physiological outcomes than a placebo.     

Comparison of triazolam to a chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine combination in the sedation of pediatric dental patients

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of triazolam to chloral hydrate with hydroxyzine when sedating young children for dental treatment. Twenty children, age 21 to 74 months, with a mean age of 44 months, were given triazolam. Twenty children, age 23 to 64 months, with a mean age of 42 months, were given chloral hydrate with hydroxyzine. The children were given an elixir of either .02 mg/kg triazolam or 40 mg/kg chloral hydrate with 25 mg hydroxyzine. All subjects received 50% nitrous oxide and were restrained with a Papoose Board. The sedations were videotaped and evaluated by two pediatric dentists not involved in the study. They rated the success of the sedations by degree of sleep, crying, body movements, and overall behavior. Time until onset of action of the agents given, oxygen saturation of arterial blood, and heart rate were measured. The vital signs were consistent for the two groups. There was no statistical difference in the effectiveness of sedation between the two groups.     

A combination of chloral hydrate,meperidine, and hydroxyzine offers a safe and effective conscious sedation regimen for pediatric patients

J Evid Base Dent Pract 2002;2:212-4     

Comparison of a chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine combination with and without meperidine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine combination with and without meperidine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients. Twenty children were given 40 mg/kg chloral hydrate and 25 mg hydroxyzine, and 20 children were given 40 mg/kg chloral hydrate and 25 mg hydroxyzine and 0.5 mg/kg meperidine. All children were between the ages of 24 and 60 months and all medications were given orally 1 hr before treatment. The children received 50% nitrous oxide for the entire procedure. All children were restrained in a Papoose Board. The patients were videotaped and their behavior was rated by two independent pediatric dentists using the Houpt Scale. The independent evaluators did not know which sedation regimen had been used. They rated success of the sedations by degree of sleep, crying, body movements, and overall behavior. Oxygen saturation of arterial blood, and heart rate also were measured. The vital signs were consistent for the two groups. There was no significant difference in the effectiveness of the two drug regimens.     

Effect of submucosal midazolam on behavior and physiologic response when combined with oral chloral hydrate and nitrous oxide sedation

PURPOSE: This study was designed to examine the efficacy and safety of submucosal (SM) midazolam and oral chloral hydrate (CH) when used for pediatric conscious sedation in a clinical dental environment. METHODS: Twenty children ages 32 to 63 months participated in this institutionally approved study. Selection criteria included good health (ASA I), 2 to 5 years of age, uncooperative behavior, and the need for multiple restorative visits. In a double-blind crossover design, patients were randomly assigned to receive either oral CH (50 mg/kg) and SM midazolam (0.2 mg/kg), or oral CH (50 mg/kg) and SM saline placebo on their first sedation visit. On the second sedation visit, the patient received the opposite drug regimen than the first visit. Nitrous oxide (50%) was used during each sedation visit. Behavior response was rated as quiet (Q), crying (C), movement (M), or struggling (S) every 2.5 minutes through 40 minutes of operative procedures. Sedations were monitored using a capnograph, pulse oximeter, an automated blood pressure cuff, and precordial stethoscope. Respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), and blood pressure (BP) were evaluated for each procedure. Data was analyzed using ANOVA and multinomial repeated-measures logistic regression. RESULTS: Analysis showed a significant difference in behavior during sedation across drug regimen (chi-square = 55.6, df = 3, P < .0001). Patients given SM midazolam in addition to oral CH showed increased Q rating and decreased C, M, and S ratings. RR, BP, and HR for both groups remained within the normal values for 2- to 5-year-olds. CONCLUSIONS: SM midazolam improved the quality of sedation without compromising safety. Quiet behavior was increased and struggling behavior was decreased. In addition, mean HR, RR, and BP analysis did not deviate from the norm for this age group.     

Comparison of chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine to midazolam regimens for oral sedation of pediatric dental patients

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the effects of oral administration of a combination of chloral hydrate (CH) 25 mg/kg, hydroxyzine (H) 1 mg/kg, and meperidine (M) 1 mg/kg to midazolam 0.65 mg/kg using 50% nitrous oxide (N2O) on behavioral and physiological parameters of young children sedated for dental procedures. Factors associated with sedation effectiveness were identified, including age, preoperative behavior, and type of procedure. METHODS: Records of 116 sedation sessions of 66 healthy, uncooperative children ages 24 to 60 months at The University of Iowa Centers for Disabilities and Development were reviewed. Patients received 1 of the 2 regimens. Intraoperative behavior was rated using a dichotomous scale. Physiological variables including heart rate and oxygen saturation were recorded at baseline and at 10-minute intervals of the session. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 9. RESULTS: Overall, 81 % of sessions were rated successful. Sedation sessions using CH+H+M combination had significantly higher success rate (P<.01, odds ratio=3.38, 95% confidence interval= 1.06 to 7.15) compared to sessions with midazolam. Sedation success was not associated with age, preoperative behavior, or type of dental procedure performed. Physiological variables were within the normal range for both regimens, although midazolam regimen recorded higher heart rates. CONCLUSIONS: CH+H+M combination using 25 mg/kg CH resulted in significantly more effective sedation sessions compared to midazolam. Both regimens used 50% N2O and were found to be safe.     

Degree of sedation. Incidence of vomiting and time of postoperative sleep with 3 different oral administration schedules of hydroxyzine chlorhydrate and chloral hydrate

In this paper a comparison of sedation effectiveness, vomiting incidence and postoperative sleeping time with three sedation schemes: Chloral hydrate exclusively, hidroxicine chlorhydrate the night before and 15 minutes before chloral hydrate administration and hidroxicine chlorhydrate 15 minutes before chloral hydrate. We find that there is no significant differences between these three sedation schemes in sedation, degree of postoperative sleeping time and vomiting incidence, therefore we can expect an effective sedation degree using any of these sedation methods.     

Acceptance of dental care following early extractions under rectal sedation with diazepam in preschool children

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of amnesia in preschool children on their later acceptance of dental care. Forty-six 4-6-year-old children, who between 2 and 4 years previously had had primary incisors extracted because of trauma, were reexamined for dental health and acceptance of dental care. The extractions had been performed under rectal sedation with diazepam (0.7 mg/kg body weight). Information about dental treatment and degree of cooperation during the intervening period was obtained from records at the referring clinic. The parents were interviewed about their child's experience of amnesia concerning the extractions, background variables, and experiences of dental care before the follow-up examination. Amnesia concerning the extractions was reported in 85% of the children. Twenty-nine percent had on some occasion exhibited behavior management problems (BMP) during the intervening period. Lack of amnesia was significantly associated with BMP (P &lt; 0.002). Children without amnesia concerning the extractions tended to accept dental care less well at the reexamination. Parents were able to predict their child's acceptance of dental care at the follow-up with a significant degree of success (P = 0.02). In conclusion, amnesia in preschool children concerning extractions seems to be essential to facilitate positive acceptance of future dental care.     

Double-blind comparison of nalbuphine and meperidine in combination with diazepam for intravenous conscious sedation in oral surgery outpatients

Nalbuphine and meperidine were compared as analgesic components of intravenous conscious sedation in a double-blind, prospective trial of 47 patients undergoing elective oral surgery. Subjects were evaluated for pain intensity, pain relief, anxiety, sedation, recall, and vital signs at systematic observation points intraoperatively and postoperatively. At the conclusion of surgery 83% of patients who had received nalbuphine and 86% of patients treated with meperidine indicated complete pain relief. One observed adverse reaction was attributed to meperidine and another to the sedative component diazepam. No statistically significant differences were observed between nalbuphine and meperidine treatments.     

Oral clonidine pre-treatment and diazepam/meperidine sedation

Clonidine has recently been used as a pre-operative medication and sedative/anxiolytic drug. Its extended duration of action makes it suitable for longer procedures. In this randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled clinical trial, we characterized the effects of oral clonidine pre-treatment on intravenous diazepam/meperidine sedation using the bi-spectral index (BIS) in 13 participants. Clonidine significantly increased the numbers of BIS-depressed readings and percent memory loss during sedation, while reducing total diazepam and post-operative analgesic dosages by 44% and 55%, respectively. Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures, as well as pulse rates, were reduced. Respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, end-tidal CO(2), and recovery from sedation were unchanged. Participants, surgeons, and sedationists preferred clonidine over the placebo. Clonidine pre-treatment increased and prolonged sedation and amnesia and stabilized vital signs while significantly decreasing diazepam and post-operative analgesic usage. These results suggest that pre-operative clonidine administration could be a useful supplement to intravenous sedation for dental procedures of long duration.