Laser in situ keratomileusis for treatment of residual myopia after photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of laser in situ keratomileusis after photorefractive keratectomy. METHODS: Eighty eyes of 80 patients with residual myopia after photorefractive keratectomy were reoperated with laser in situ keratomileusis. The study was retrospective. Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed using the automated corneal shaper microkeratome and Chiron Technolas 217-C d1 excimer laser. Data measured after laser in situ keratomileusis included uncorrected visual acuity, best-corrected visual acuity, refraction, haze, pachymetry, and keratometry. The follow-up was at least 12 +/- 1.6 months (range, 12 to 15 months). RESULTS: After laser in situ keratomileusis the mean spherical equivalent was -0.24 diopters +/- 0.78. (range, -3 to +1.5) at 12 months, and the mean uncorrected visual acuity was 0.76 diopters +/- 0.24 (range, 0.1 to 1). Sixty-five eyes (81.3%) had various degrees of haze after laser in situ keratomileusis. One eye (1.2%) lost 2 lines of best-corrected visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement may be a good alternative to correct residual myopia and astigmatism after primary photorefractive keratectomy. Corneal haze is a common problem in these eyes, and the treatment after laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement should be the same as the treatment after primary photorefractive keratectomy.     

Influence of wavefront aberration and corneal subepithelial haze on low-contrast visual acuity after photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To assess low-contrast visual acuity (LCVA) after photorefractive keratectomy in relation to ocular higher-order wavefront aberration and corneal subepithelial haze. DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional analysis. METHODS: Photorefractive keratectomy was performed in 51 eyes of 27 subjects with myopic refractive error of -2.0 to -10.5 diopters. Ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations for a 4-mm pupil were measured using Topcon Hartmann-Shack wavefront aberrometer, and the extent of corneal subepithelial haze was quantified with Nidek TSPC-3 hazemeter before and 1 month after photorefractive keratectomy. Low-contrast visual acuity was recorded with Vector Vision CSV-1000LanC10% chart. Total higher-order, third-order (coma-like), and fourth-order (spherical-like) aberrations of the eye were determined. The influence of wavefront aberration and corneal subepithelial haze on LCVA was analyzed. RESULTS: Total higher-order, third-order, and fourth-order aberrations significantly increased by surgery (P < .001, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Photorefractive keratectomy induced a significant increase in corneal haze (P < .01), but no case presented severe corneal haze (grade 3 or greater by Fantes grading). By surgery, LCVA was reduced significantly (P < .001). The logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution LCVA showed a significant correlation with total higher-order aberration (Spearman rank correlation coefficient, r(s) = 0.642, P < .0001). Both third-order (r(s) = 0.618, P < .0001) and fourth-order aberrations (r(s) = 0.552, P < .0001) also significantly correlated with logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution LCVA. There was no correlation between the degree of corneal haze and logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution LCVA (r(s) = 0.094, P = .523). CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with mild to moderate corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy, deterioration of LCVA is mainly attributable to increases in wavefront aberration, and not to corneal haze.     

Visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy with a 6-mm ablation zone.

PURPOSE: To prospectively examine the effect of photorefractive keratectomy with a 6-mm ablation zone on best-spectacle-corrected visual performance. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted of 164 eyes of 164 patients with an average (+/-SD) of -4.02 +/- 1.74 diopters (range, -0.63 to -8.38 diopters spherical equivalent). Best-spectacle-corrected high-contrast and low-contrast visual acuity (18% Weber contrast) was measured with both natural and dilated pupils. Patients were tested preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months after photorefractive keratectomy. Photorefractive keratectomy was performed with an argon fluoride excimer laser. Fifty-five eyes of 55 patients also underwent astigmatic keratotomy. RESULTS: Twelve months after photorefractive keratectomy, best-spectacle-corrected high-contrast visual acuity with natural pupils showed no significant change from preoperative values; mean (+/-SD) change was 0.004 +/- 0.10 logMAR (t = 0.45, P = .65). Best-spectacle-corrected low-contrast visual acuity with natural pupils was significantly reduced compared to baseline; mean (+/-SD) change was 0.04 +/- 0.13 logMAR (t = 3.3, P = .001). The low-contrast loss was larger (1.5 lines) with dilated pupils; mean (+/-SD) change was 0.13 +/- 0.15 logMAR (t = 9.31, P < .001). Greater losses in dilated low-contrast visual acuity were associated with concurrent astigmatic ketatotomy (t = 2.28, P = .025) and corneal haze of grade 1 or greater (t = 2.71, P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in visual performance occur after photorefractive keratectomy with a 6-mm zone. These changes are greatest for low-contrast visual acuity with dilated pupils. Corneal haze and concurrent astigmatic keratotomy are associated with greater losses in low-contrast visual acuity. Best-spectacle-corrected low-contrast visual acuity is a sensitive measure for evaluating visual performance after refractive surgery.     

Intacs after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intrastromal corneal ring segments (Intacs, Addition Technology) for the correction of residual myopia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: In this prospective noncomparative case series, Intacs were implanted in 5 eyes (4 patients) that developed myopic regression after LASIK or PRK. Intacs were implanted a minimum of 11 months after the laser procedure. The technique was identical to the standard procedure for myopic unoperated eyes. The Intacs thickness was based on the amount of residual myopia. RESULTS: Postoperative results revealed a reduction in the residual myopia and the mean K-reading. No eye lost best corrected Snellen visual acuity. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of Intacs in eyes with myopic regression after LASIK and PRK resulted in a good refractive outcome and an improvement in uncorrected visual acuity.     

Keratectasia induced by laser in situ keratomileusis in keratoconus

PURPOSE: Corneal thinning disorders weaken the mechanical strength of affected corneas, suggesting that photorefractive procedures may be contraindicated in keratoconus. Few cases have been reported to confirm this hypothesis. METHODS: A 45-year-old man had two laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedures and one photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) performed on his left eye, and three LASIK procedures on his right eye. After these surgeries, a dramatic corneal ectasia and grade III haze occurred in both eyes, with a clinical diagnosis of keratoconus. The changes in his corneas were followed with videokeratography and slit-lamp microscopy. RESULTS: Preoperative videokeratograph of both eyes suggested keratoconus. After multiple refractive procedures, the best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was as low as 20/1200 bilaterally. Both eyes displayed dramatic corneal protrusion with corneal scarring. CONCLUSIONS: This case emphasizes the need for preoperative corneal thickness measurement and detailed analysis of videokeratographs. Thinning corneal disorders such as keratoconus, keratoconus suspects, or pellucid marginal degeneration are a contraindication for excimer laser ablative refractive procedures.     

准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术矫治高度近视准分子激光屈光性角膜切削术后屈光回退的临床观察

目的评价准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术（LASIK）矫治高度近视准分子激光屈光性角膜切削术（PRK）后屈光回退的疗效。方法回顾性临床研究。对PRK术后2年以上、屈光回退且屈光度稳定的患者8例14眼行LASIK,对LASIK术后术眼进行评价。患眼PRK术前屈光度为-6.25～-12.50 D,PRK术后屈光度为-1.50～-6.25 D。随访观察LASIK矫正1年后术眼的裸眼视力、最佳矫正视力、屈光度、上皮下雾状混浊（haze）形成和角膜厚度的变化。结果所有患眼术后主观症状较轻。LASIK术后1年平均球镜度数为（-0.62±0.94）D。LASIK术后0.5≤裸眼视力〈0.8者4眼,≥0.8者9眼,1眼（7.1%）最佳矫正视力下降2行。4眼术后出现不同程度的haze,包括2级haze 3眼、3级haze 1眼。应用氟米龙滴眼液1个月后,haze及屈光回退减轻;术后1年,1级haze 2眼,2级haze 2眼,3级haze 1眼。LASIK术前角膜厚度为（467±38）μm,术后为（422±21）μm。结论高度近视PRK术后屈光回退行LASIK矫治是一种可行的方法,但少数患者术后可出现haze,仍需治疗。     

Photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of residual refractive error with Intacs intrastromal corneal ring segments in place

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for residual refractive errors in patients who had previous insertion of intrastromal corneal ring segments (Intacs, Addition Technology, Inc.) for treatment of low myopia. SETTING: Shiley Eye Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. METHODS: This retrospective case series comprised patients who had Intacs segment implantation and subsequently developed myopic regression. Eight eyes of 5 patients had PRK over the Intacs in situ for the correction of the residual refractive error. RESULTS: Six (75%) of the 8 eyes had plano refraction with 20/20 or better uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) 1 month after PRK enhancement. Three months postoperatively, all eyes had plano refraction with 20/20 or better acuity. At the last follow-up examination (up to 2 years), all eyes had near plano vision (20/10 to 20/25). The corneal surface epithelium in all eyes healed in 3 to 5 days. One patient had subepithelial haze in both eyes, which resolved with epithelial scraping with mitomycin-C (MMC) application and a phototherapeutic keratectomy enhancement. CONCLUSIONS: This small series showed that PRK can be used to treat residual refractive error after Intacs insertion. The UCVA was 20/25 or better in all cases after PRK enhancement. The incidence of post-PRK haze in this series of patients was high; topical MMC might be used in future cases to mitigate the problem.     

Phototherapeutic keratectomy with mitomycin C for corneal haze following photorefractive keratectomy for myopia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) with single application of mitomycin C for patients with severe corneal haze following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for high myopia. METHODS: Eight eyes of seven patients were treated with PTK and intraoperative topical application of mitomycin C (0.02%) for severe corneal haze (grade 3) following PRK for myopia. RESULTS: All patients' visual performance improved significantly. Mean preoperative visual acuity (20/200 for both UCVA and BSCVA) improved significantly to 20/33 (0.6) and 20/30 (0.7) for UCVA and BSCVA, respectively. Six eyes (85.7%) had improved UCVA to 20/40 or better and gained five or more lines of UCVA. The corneal haze score decreased from grade 3 initially (for all eyes prior to PTK and mitomycin C) to a final mean haze score of 0.3 (range 0 to 0.5). Mean final spherical equivalent refraction achieved was -1.30 +/- 1.60 D (range -3.75 to +1.25 D). One eye gained only three lines of visual acuity due to regression and residual haze. No adverse effects related to the use of mitomycin C were recorded. CONCLUSION: PTK with a single intraoperative application of mitomycin C was safe and effective in reducing corneal haze and improving visual acuity in patients with severe corneal haze following PRK.     

Photorefractive keratectomy retreatment after LASIK

PURPOSE: To study the results of late photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in corneas originally subjected to LASIK. METHODS: Seven eyes of seven patients who had LASIK for myopia were retreated with PRK at least 2 years after LASIK. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refraction, and haze were evaluated before and after LASIK and after retreatment by PRK. RESULTS: Photorefractive keratectomy retreatment improved BSCVA in six (86%) of seven eyes, and one (14%) eye showed no changes. None of the eyes lost lines of BSCVA. Five of seven eyes developed mild haze, which disappeared before the last postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy retreatment performed at least 2 years after LASIK can improve visual acuity. We hypothesize that LASIK-induced corneal nerve damage disturbs corneal wound healing by increasing the tendency for development of haze.     

Transepithelial Laser versus Alcohol Assisted Photorefractive Keratectomy Safety and Efficacy: 1-Year Follow-up of a Contralateral Eye Study

PurposeTo compare single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK) to conventional alcohol assisted epithelial removal then photorefractive keratectomy (AAPRK) regarding pain, epithelial healing, visual acuity, corneal haze measured subjectively and objectively, higher order aberrations changes, contrast sensitivity and vector analysis of astigmatic correction with one year follow-up.MethodsA prospective double-blind randomized study of 29 subjects (58 eyes) who underwent myopic aberration-free laser correction by smart pulse technology using Schwind Amaris 1050 Hz with 1-year follow-up. Right eye was randomly treated by AAPRK or TPRK. Postoperative assessment was performed on day 1 and 3, at 1st week, and 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months. Patients were assessed for pain, epithelial healing, visual acuity, corneal haze, astigmatic correction, higher order aberrations and contrast sensitivity.ResultsEpithelial healing was complete by the 3rd day in 62.1% of AAPRK eyes and in 89.7% of TPRK eyes. First day postoperative pain was higher in TPRK group (p = 0.0134). The decimal uncorrected visual acuity at 12 months was 1.47 ± 0.39 and 1.57 ± 0.38 in the AAPRK and TPRK groups respectively (p = 0.3719). Post-photorefractive keratectomy haze reached a final level of 0.04 ± 0.14 and 0.02 ± 0.1 in AAPRK and TPRK groups respectively (p = 0.5607). Contrast sensitivity was comparable in low and high frequency cycles per degree. Vector analysis of astigmatic correction showed correction index at one year of 0.99 and 1.05 for AAPRK and TPRK groups respectively.ConclusionsAlcohol assisted and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy have comparable results regarding safety and efficacy.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy versus photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of myopia. A prospective comparative study

PURPOSE: To compare the early postoperative visual rehabilitation after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of myopia. SETTING: CODET Aris Vision Institute, Tijuana, Mexico. METHODS: This prospective study included 50 eyes of 25 patients with myopia who received LASEK in 1 eye and PRK in the contralateral eye. Excimer laser corneal ablation was done using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. Patients were seen at 1 and 3 days, 1 week, and 1 month. Discomfort, subjective uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), objective UCVA, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal clarity (haze), and time for corneal reepithelialization were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent and 80% of the LASEK eyes had more discomfort at 1 day and 3 days, respectively. Eighty percent and 96% of the PRK eyes had better subjective UCVA at 1 day and 3 days, respectively. Corneas were fully reepithelialized at a mean of 3.3 days +/- 0.5 (SD) and 3.6 +/- 0.5 days in the PRK and LASEK groups, respectively. At 1 month, the UCVA was similar in both groups; no eye had lost lines of BCVA or developed haze. CONCLUSIONS: Both LASEK and PRK were effective and safe procedures in the surgical correction of myopia at the 1-month postoperative visit. Patients reported less discomfort and better visual acuity in their PRK eye during the early postoperative period. Patients should be informed that LASEK, whose acronym is similar to that of laser in situ keratomileusis, has a recovery speed that is similar to that of surface laser refractive procedures such as PRK.     

Retreatment after PRK for low and medium myopia. Results and study of contrast sensitivity

PURPOSE: To examine the results of retreatment with eximer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) on refraction, visual acuity, haze, and contrast sensitivity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy was performed in 18 patients, once for one eye and twice for the other eye due to undercorrection or regression. Outcome was compared between the two eyes. RESULTS: Uncorrected visual acuity was above 20/40 in 94.4% of the retreated eyes. There was no statistical difference between the two eyes for haze and contrast sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Retreatment with laser photorefractive keratectomy is a safe procedure and should be performed when regression or undercorrection occurs after the first laser excimer treatment.     

Haze after laser in situ keratomileusis in eyes with previous photorefractive keratectomy.

In cases with previous photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), there is a risk of developing severe haze after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). We report 3 patients (4 eyes) who developed severe haze after LASIK treatment for residual myopia following PRK. Both PRK and LASIK procedures were performed using the VISX 20/20 excimer laser. We report the grade of haze, amount of regression, and visual acuity after the patients were treated with topical steroids. In 2 eyes, the uncorrected visual acuity was 1.0 after 1 year with grade I haze. In the other 2 eyes, there was a residual refractive error, and the best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 0.7 with grade II haze.     

LASEK and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: clinical and confocal microscopy comparison

PURPOSE: To compare postoperative visual acuity and corneal morphology after laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in the correction of low to moderate myopia. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized clinical trial, 50 myopic patients (mean: -4.5 +/- 1.35 diopters) were randomized to receive LASEK in one eye and PRK in the fellow eye. No mitomycin C eye drops were used in this study. Patients were observed daily for 4 days, then at 1 month and every 3 months up to 1 year. Uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity (UCVA and BSCVA), manifest refraction, corneal epithelium healing time, postoperative pain, and corneal haze were evaluated. Corneal wound healing was quantified with corneal confocal microscopy. RESULTS: Refractive error, UCVA, and BSCVA were not statistically different between eyes treated with LASEK and PRK. Corneal epithelium healing time was 2.52 +/- 0.99 days in the eyes treated with PRK and 2.29 +/- 0.52 days in the eyes treated with LASEK (P=.22). The postoperative pain score was 2.17 +/- 0.87 in the eyes treated with PRK and 2.62 +/- 0.60 (P=.02) in the eyes treated with LASEK. Corneal confocal microscopy showed fewer stromal activated keratocytes and less extracellular matrix deposition in the eyes treated with LASEK than in the eyes treated with PRK at 1 month postoperatively (P=.003). CONCLUSIONS: LASEK is an effective and safe procedure for low to moderate myopia, but it seems more painful until full corneal reepithelization. In the early postoperative period, the corneal wound healing process is significantly less intense in eyes treated with LASEK than in eyes treated with PRK. The role of LASEK in corneal wound healing modulation remains controversial.     

Quantification of simulated corneal haze by measuring back-scattered light

The Scheimpflug anterior eye segment analysis system EAS-1000 was modified to specifically quantitate the degree of corneal haze. In order to confirm the basic measurement performance of the new system, TSPC-3 hazemeter, in vitro experiments were conducted. Using white latex microsphere solutions, tests were performed for the linearity of the measurements, the influence of slit lamp illuminance and the influence of the length of the light path through the latex solution. The validity of Beer's law was confirmed, indicating that a sufficiently wide range of latex concentrations (haze intensities) can be covered by the hazemeter. The scattering intensity measured with the hazemeter showed a significant linear correlation with the latex concentration. The obtained scattering intensity was directly proportional to the illuminance of the slit lamp. The ratio of integrated scattering values was proportional to that of the light path length. It was shown that the TSPC-3 hazemeter possesses sufficient capability for a quantitative evaluation of corneal haze.     

Corneal sensitivity after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for low myopia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the recovery of postoperative corneal sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of low myopia. METHODS: In a prospective study, 17 consecutive eyes (17 patients) underwent laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia ranging from -3.25 to -6.75 diopters, and another 18 consecutive eyes (18 patients) underwent photorefractive keratectomy to correct myopia from -3.12 to -7.00 diopters. Corneal sensitivity was tested preoperatively and 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively using the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer. Corneal sensitivity was tested at the center of the cornea, and in four additional central points 2 mm from the corneal center (nasal, inferior, temporal, and superior). RESULTS: Corneal sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis was reduced at the ablated zone during the first 3 months after surgery (Wilcoxon rank sum test, P < .05), and only after 6 months it returned to its preoperative values. However, corneal sensitivity recovered its preoperative values 1 month after photorefractive keratectomy (Wilcoxon rank sum test, P > .05), except for the central corneal point, where 3 months were required. Comparing both groups, corneal sensitivity was more depressed after laser in situ keratomileusis than after photorefractive keratectomy during the first 3 months (Mann-Whitney test, P < .05), except for the nasal central point, although no differences were found between both groups at 6 months (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: In the correction of low myopia, corneal sensitivity at the ablated zone was more depressed after laser in situ keratomileusis than after photorefractive keratectomy during the first 3 months after surgery. Only after 6 months were corneal sensitivity values similar in both groups.     

Superficial lamellar keratectomy using an automated microkeratome to excise corneal scarring caused by photorefractive keratectomy.

Corneal haze is a recognized complication of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. When severe, it can result in the formation of a dense corneal scar, with a reduction in best corrected visual acuity. In extreme cases, medical treatment and repeated phototherapeutic excimer ablations may fail to restore corneal transparency. In these patients, penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) has been used to restore visual function. We describe a technique for excising a superficial corneal scar using an automated microkeratome. The resultant corneal surface is quite smooth, and good visual acuity may be restored without resorting to PKP.     

Comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness, safety, and stability of laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), a modified photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) technique, with those of conventional PRK for low to moderate myopia. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. METHODS: In this prospective study, 27 patients with a manifest refraction of -3.00 to -6.50 diopters were treated and followed for 3 months. In each case, PRK was performed in 1 eye and LASEK in the other eye. The first eye treated and the surgical method used in the first eye were randomized. Postoperative pain, epithelial healing time, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refraction, corneal haze, and surgical preference were examined in PRK- and LASEK-treated eyes. RESULTS: During the 3 month follow-up, there were no significant between-eye differences in epithelial healing time, UCVA, or refractive error. However, LASEK-treated eyes had lower postoperative pain scores (P =.047) and corneal haze scores (1 month; P =.02) than PRK-treated eyes. Seventeen patients (63%) preferred the LASEK procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Laser epithelial keratomileusis safely and effectively treated eyes with low to moderate myopia. It reduced the incidence of significant postoperative pain and corneal haze and may prevent the flap- and interface-related problems of laser in situ keratomileusis.     

非球面切削LASEK治疗薄角膜高度近视的临床疗效研究

目的 探讨角膜波前像差引导联合Q值优化的最优个性化角膜屈光矫正程序(ORK-CAM)引导的非球面切削准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)治疗角膜薄的高度近视临床疗效.方法 运用角膜波前像差引导联合Q值优化的ORK-CAM及小光斑高速飞点激光扫描系统对49例76只眼角膜薄的高度近视患者行LASEK.术后2周,1月,3及6月检查裸眼视力、验光、Haze等级.术后半年时复查角膜地形图、波前像差、视觉对比敏感度并进行满意度调查.结果 术前平均最佳眼镜矫正视力(BSCVA)为1.10+0.12,术后6月BUCVA(BUCVA)为1.12+0.17.术后平均模拟角膜记读数(SimK)等效值、慧差、球差、总体像差分别增加了-13.5%、93.87%、172.22%、23.81%、43.28%,较术前差异有统计学意义.角膜地形图形态有92.11%为同心圆型,视觉质量满意度为95.92%.结论 角膜波前像差引导的LASEK治疗角膜薄的高度近视,术后3个月以后平均视力稳定,且好于术前BCVA.术后6月时平均总波前像差增加百分比较小,球差增加较少,较好的保持了角膜的的非球面性.术后患者出现眩光、夜视力差的机率较低,具有较好的临床疗效.