Phenocopy breast cancer rates in Israeli <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1</Emphasis><Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA2</Emphasis> mutation carrier families: is the risk increased in non-carriers?

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers have an increased risk for developing breast (and ovarian) cancer. Non-carriers from within such families (=true negatives) are counseled that their risk for developing breast cancer is similar to that of the average-risk population. Breast cancer diagnosed in a non-carrier from a family with a known mutation is coined phenocopy. The rate of breast cancer phenocopy and the risk for breast cancer in true negatives are unsettled. The rate of phenocopy breast cancer was assessed in non-carriers from Jewish families with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, identified at the Sheba medical center. Analysis was performed by t test for comparison of mean age at counseling or breast cancer diagnosis, and by calculating a standardized incidence ratio (SIR). Overall, 1318 females from 884 mutation carrying families (620 with BRCA1 264 with BRCA2 mutations) were genotyped, of whom 307 women from 245 families were assigned a true negative status (mean age at counseling 43.01 ± 13.03 years (range 19.7–92.8 years). Of these true negatives, 20 women (6.51–2.26% of families) developed breast cancer at a mean age of 54.1 ± 12.9 years (range 48.1 –60.1 years). The SIR for breast cancer in true negatives was not significantly different than the expected in the average-risk Israeli population [observed 20-expected 23.8 cases SIR = 0.84, 95% CI (0.51, 1.30)]. The rate of phenocopy breast cancer in non-carriers from Israeli BRCA1 BRCA2 mutation carrier families is 2.26% with no increased breast cancer risk over the average-risk population.     

The silent mutation nucleotide 744 G → A,Lys172Lys,in exon 6 of <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA2</Emphasis> results in exon skipping

Germ-line mutations in BRCA2 predispose to breast and ovarian cancer. Mutations are widespread throughout the gene and include disease-causing mutations as frameshift, nonsense, splicing mutations and large genomic rearrangements. However a large number of mutations, including missense, silent and intron variants are of unknown significance. Here, we describe the functional characterization of a silent mutation (nucleotide 744 G → A/c.516 G → A, Lys172Lys) in exon 6 of BRCA2 in a Danish family with breast and ovarian cancer. Exon trapping analysis showed that the mutation results in skipping of exon 6 and/or both exon 5 and 6, which was verified by RT-PCR analysis on RNA isolated from whole blood of the affected patient. We therefore conclude that the BRCA2 silent mutation Lys172Lys is a disease-causing mutation.     

Smoking and risk of breast cancer in carriers of mutations in <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1</Emphasis> or <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA2</Emphasis> aged less than 50 years

Background Cigarette smoke contains compounds that may damage DNA, and the repair of damage may be impaired in women with germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. However, the effect of cigarette smoking on breast cancer risk in mutation carriers is the subject of conflicting reports. We have examined the relation between smoking and breast cancer risk in non-Hispanic white women under the age of 50 years who carry a deleterious mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Methods We conducted a case-control study using data from carriers of mutations in BRCA1 (195 cases and 302 controls) and BRCA2 (128 cases and 179 controls). Personal information, including smoking history, was collected using a common structured questionnaire by eight recruitment sites in four countries. Odds-ratios (OR) for breast cancer risk according to smoking were adjusted for age, family history, parity, alcohol use, and recruitment site. Results Compared to non-smokers, the OR for risk of breast cancer for women with five or more pack-years of smoking was 2.3 (95% confidence interval 1.6–3.5) for BRCA1 carriers and 2.6 (1.8–3.9) for BRCA2 carriers. Risk increased 7% per pack-year (p < 0.001) in both groups. Conclusions These results indicate that smoking is associated with increased risk of breast cancer before age 50 years in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. If confirmed, they provide a practical way for carriers to reduce their risks. Previous studies in prevalent mutation carriers have not shown smoking to increase risk of breast cancer, but are subject to bias, because smoking decreases survival after breast cancer. Northern California Family Registry for Breast Cancer: AS Whittemore, Stanford University School of Medicine, EM John, Northern California Cancer Center, A Felberg, Stanford University School of Medicine, V McGuire, Stanford University School of Medicine, DW West, Northern California Cancer Center, A Miron, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, DC Thomas, USC Keck School of Medicine, R Haile, USC Keck School of Medicine and Norris Comprehensive Cancer. Fox Chase Familial Breast Cancer Registry: M Daly, Fox Chase Cancer Center, A Godwin, Fox Chase Cancer Center, E Ross, Fox Chase Cancer Center. Coriell Institute: J Beck. New York Familial Breast Cancer Registry: MB Terry, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University. Utah Breast Cancer Family Registry: SS Buys, Huntsman Cancer Institute, V Venne, Huntsman Cancer Institute. Australian Breast Cancer Family Study: JL Hopper, The University of Melbourne, GG Giles, The Cancer Council Victoria, MRE McCredie, University of Otago, New Zealand, RL Milne, Spanish National Cancer Centre, MC Southey, The University of Melbourne, MA Jenkins, The University of Melbourne, C Apicella, The University of Melbourne. Kathleen Cuningham Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer (kConFab), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre. Ontario Familial Breast Cancer Registry: I Andrulis, Cancer Care Ontario, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, NF Boyd, Ontario Cancer Institute, J Knight, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, H Ozcelik, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital. Correspondence to: Dr NF Boyd, Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Room 10-415, Ontario Cancer Institute, 610 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9. Boyd@uhnres.utoronto.ca     

Prevalence of <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA2</Emphasis> mutations in unselected breast cancer patients from Medellín,Colombia

Background

Approximately 5% of all breast cancers can be attributed to a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. The genetic component of breast cancer in Colombia has been, for the most part, studied on cases from the Bogota region. Five different founder mutations have been identified in two studies of breast cancer patients in the Bogota region. It is important that the frequency of mutations be established among unselected cases of breast cancer of other regions of Colombia in order to estimate the genetic burden of this cancer in Colombia and to plan genetic services. The aim of this study was to establish the mutation frequencies of the BRCA genes in breast cancer patients unselected for family history or age, from Medellin, Colombia.

Methods

We enrolled 280 unselected women with breast cancer from a large public hospital in Medellin, Colombia. A detailed family history from each patient and a blood sample was obtained and processed for DNA analysis. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were sought using a combination of techniques including a panel of recurrent Hispanic BRCA mutations which consists of fifty BRCA1 mutations and forty-six BRCA2 mutations, including the five recurrent Colombian BRCA mutations. All mutations were confirmed by direct sequencing.

Results

Genetic testing was successfully completed for 244 of the 280 cases (87%). Among the 244 cases, three deleterious mutations were identified (two in BRCA1 and one in BRCA2), representing 1.2% of the total. The average age of breast cancer in the mutation-positive cases was 34 years. The two BRCA1 mutations were known founder mutations (3450del4 in exon 11 and A1708E in exon 18). The BRCA2 mutation was in exon 11 (5844del5) and has not been previously reported in individuals of Colombian descent. Among the three mutation-positive families was a breast cancer family and two families with no history of breast or ovarian cancer.

Conclusion

The frequency of BRCA mutations in unselected breast cancer cases from the Medellin region of Colombia is low and is approximately 1.2%.

     

Relative contributions of <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA2</Emphasis> mutations to “triple-negative” breast cancer in Ashkenazi Women

Approximately 10% of Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) women with breast cancer (BC) carry a founder mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. There is an association between BRCA1 mutations and “triple-negative” breast cancer (TNBC) [estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) negative, HER2 negative]. We sought to determine the predictive value of the TNBC phenotype for the presence of a BRCA mutation in AJ women ascertained without respect to family history. DNA samples were collected between 8/2000 and 6/2004 from a prevalent cohort of unselected AJ women with breast cancer (median age at diagnosis 56 years). Samples (n = 451) were genotyped for AJ founder mutations. 352 (78.0%) cancers were ER positive, 254 (56.3%) PR positive, and 91 (20.2%) ER negative/PR negative. 63 (14.0%) cancers were HER2 positive (immunohistochemistry 3+ or FISH >2.2). TNBC was observed in 64 patients (14.2%). Founder mutations were detected in 48 samples (10.6%) including 25/64 TNBC (39.1%; 19 BRCA1, 6 BRCA2). Among TNBC patients with family history (FH) information, 6/15 (40%) mutations were found in women without breast or ovarian cancer in a close relative. The positive predictive value of TNBC for a BRCA1 mutation was 30% overall, 50% in women diagnosed<50 years, and 14% in women diagnosed ≥50. TNBC was significantly associated with detecting a mutation in either BRCA1 or BRCA2, but only 25/52 (48%) mutation-associated cancers were TNBC. The prevalence of BRCA founder mutations exceeds 50% in subsets of AJ women with TNBC. FH is an imperfect predictor of mutation status in this group. A significant number of mutation-associated TNBC are due to BRCA2.     

Is the breast-conserving treatment with radiotherapy appropriate in <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1/2</Emphasis> mutation carriers? Long-term results and review of the literature

As tumours in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers might be more sensitive to radiation, we investigated after long-term follow-up whether mutation status influenced the rate of ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers after breast-conserving treatment (BCT). BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were screened for germline mutations in 131 patients with a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer who had undergone BCT and radiotherapy. Patients were matched to 261 controls with sporadic breast cancer according to age at diagnosis and year of treatment. Controls were followed up for at least as long as the interval between diagnosis and genetic screening in familial cases. Rates of ipsilateral and contralateral cancer between groups were compared by the log-rank test. The BRCA1/2 mutations occurred in 20.6% of tested patients. Tumours in mutation carriers were more likely to be grade III (P < 10⁻⁴) and oestrogen receptor negative (P = 0.005) than in non-carriers and controls. Overall median follow-up was 161 months. There was no significant difference in ipsilateral tumours between mutation carriers, non-carriers and controls (P = 0.13). On multivariate analysis, age was the most significant predictor for ipsilateral recurrence (P < 10⁻³). The rate of contralateral cancer was significantly higher in familial cases: 40.7% (mutation carriers), 20% (non-carriers), and 11% (controls) (P < 10⁻⁴). After 13.4 years of follow-up, the rate of ipsilateral tumours was no higher in mutation carriers than in non-carriers or controls. As tumours in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers might be more sensitive to radiation, BCT is a possible treatment option.     

Sex Ratio Distortion in Offspring of Families with <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">BRCA1</Emphasis> or <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">BRCA2</Emphasis> Mutant Alleles: An Ascertainment Bias Phenomenon?

Summary Background. There has been controversy regarding whether BRCA1 germline mutations favor female births or whether the sex imbalances observed are attributable to ascertainment bias. Our aims were to compare the sex ratios among offspring of BRCA1-positive, BRCA2-positive, and BRCA-negative families undergoing genetic testing in clinical programs, and to determine whether ascertainment bias is responsible for the observed preponderance of female offspring.Patients and methods. A total of 145 breast and/or ovarian cancer families with mutations in BRCA1 (n = 83) or BRCA2 (n = 62), and 90 families without identifiable mutation were collected for the study from familial cancer clinics in Barcelona, Spain, and Boston, US. Sex ratio was analyzed among all births in the families and offspring of all (tested and obligate) carriers. In order to minimize the effect of family history of cancer, the analysis was also performed among offspring of the most recent generation of mutation-positive carriers who did not have affected children and compared with a control group comprised of the offspring of the most recent adult generation of non-carriers from families with a known mutation.Results. There was a statistically higher proportion of female births in all groups (BRCA1 59% (95% CI = 57–61%), BRCA2 58% (56–61%), and BRCA-negative 59% (56–61%), respectively). The female preponderance persisted in analyses limited to offspring of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (61% (57–65%), and 62% (58–66%), respectively), with no differences between the two mutation groups. In contrast, the excess of female offspring disappeared when ascertainment or recall biases were minimized, 44% (37–52%), and 39% (26–53%) for BRCA1; 51% (44–58%), and 46% (33–60%) for BRCA2.Conclusions. Our findings suggest that there is no asymmetry in birth outcomes among BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations carriers. Rather ascertainment bias in families participating in genetic testing, or in the family history information they provide is likely to account for excess of female offspring previously reported.     

Are <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1</Emphasis>- and <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA2</Emphasis>-related breast cancers associated with increased mortality?

There has been contradictory evidence as to whether BRCA1 associated breast cancers have a poorer prognosis than non-BRCA1 cancers. In this issue of Breast Cancer Research Robson and colleagues provide further evidence for poorer survival in BRCA1 carriers and show that it could be attributed to failure to treat small node-negative grade 3 breast cancers with chemotherapy. There still remains little evidence for a survival difference for BRCA2 related breast cancers. Although the high contralateral breast cancer risk is confirmed by this study there is no real evidence for an increase in ipsilateral recurrence or new primary breast cancers in mutation carriers up to the 10-year point.     

Baseline and post prophylactic tubal–ovarian surgery CA125 levels in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

The aim of this study was to determine whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers have different baseline CA125 levels compared with non-carriers, and whether a significant difference in pre- and post-operative CA125 levels exists in BRCA mutation carriers undergoing risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO). The study also considered whether CA125 measurements should continue in unaffected BRCA mutation carriers after RRBSO. 383 Eligible women were identified through retrospective review of the BRCA Carrier Clinic at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. These women all had CA125 levels measured as they were either a carrier or at risk of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Of these, 76 went on to have a negative predictive test for their familial mutation and so are classed as ‘non-carriers’. 133 BRCA1 and 87 BRCA2 carriers had RRBSO, with a further 26 BRCA1 carriers, 28 BRCA2 carriers and one non-carrier developing ovarian cancer. The remaining 21 BRCA1 and 28 BRCA2 carriers did not have RRBSO or develop ovarian cancer in the time of study follow-up. CA125 levels were measured as surveillance or as part of pre-RRBSO care. CA125 measurement post-RRBSO was continued in 48 BRCA1 and 40 BRCA2 carriers. In 154 BRCA1 mutation carriers, the median baseline (i.e. before RRBSO and with no clinical signs of ovarian cancer) CA125 level was 9.0 U/ml (range 2–78) and was 10.0 U/ml (range 1–43) in 115 BRCA2 mutation carriers. When compared with the 75 non-carriers (median baseline CA125 10.0 U/ml; range 2–52), there was no significant difference between the BRCA1, BRCA2 and non-carrier groups. There was a significant reduction in CA125 from pre- to post-RRBSO in 48 BRCA1 carriers (p = 0.04) but no significant difference in 40 BRCA2 mutation carriers (p = 0.5). Out of a total of 220 mutation carriers who underwent RRBSO, two had an incidental ovarian cancer found on histopathology and another developed primary peritoneal cancer during the follow-up period. Our study is the first to compare initial serum CA125 levels in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with those of non-carriers. Our study found no significant difference between the three groups. A drop in CA125 levels after RRBSO in BRCA1 carriers supports the finding of earlier studies, but differed in that the fall was not seen in BRCA2 carriers. The finding of only one case of post-operative peritoneal cancer in 220 carriers undergoing RRBSO supports the discontinuation of post-RRBSO serum CA125 monitoring in BRCA mutation carriers.     

Haplotype analysis suggest that the <Emphasis Type="Italic">MLH1</Emphasis> c.2059C &gt; T mutation is a Swedish founder mutation

Lynch syndrome (LS) predisposes to a spectrum of cancers and increases the lifetime risk of developing colorectal- or endometrial cancer to over 50%. Lynch syndrome is dominantly inherited and is caused by defects in DNA mismatch-repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2, with the vast majority detected in MLH1 and MSH2. Recurrent LS-associated variants observed in apparently unrelated individuals, have either arisen de novo in different families due to mutation hotspots, or are inherited from a founder (a common ancestor) that lived several generations back. There are variants that recur in some populations while also acting as founders in other ethnic groups. Testing for founder mutations can facilitate molecular diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome more efficiently and more cost effective than screening for all possible mutations. Here we report a study of the missense mutation MLH1 c.2059C?>?T (p.Arg687Trp), a potential founder mutation identified in eight Swedish families and one Finnish family with Swedish ancestors. Haplotype analysis confirmed that the Finnish and Swedish families shared a haplotype of between 0.9 and 2.8 Mb. While MLH1 c.2059C?>?T exists worldwide, the Swedish haplotype was not found among mutation carriers from Germany or France, which indicates a common founder in the Swedish population. The geographic distribution of MLH1 c.2059C?>?T in Sweden suggests a single, ancient mutational event in the northern part of Sweden.     

Time to stop ovarian cancer screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers?

Women at high risk of ovarian cancer due to a genetic predisposition may opt for either surveillance or prophylactic bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy (pBSO). Main objective of our study was to determine the effectiveness of ovarian cancer screening in women with a BRCA1/2 mutation. We evaluated 241 consecutive women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who were enrolled in the surveillance program for hereditary ovarian cancer from September 1995 until May 2006 at the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), The Netherlands. The ovarian cancer screening included annual pelvic examination, transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) and serum CA125 measurement. To evaluate the effectiveness of screening in diagnosing (early stage) ovarian cancer sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of pelvic examination, TVU and CA125 were calculated. Three ovarian cancers were detected during the surveillance period; 1 prevalent cancer, 1 interval cancer and 1 screen‐detected cancer, all in an advanced stage (FIGO stage IIIc). A PPV of 20% was achieved for pelvic examination, 33% for TVU and 6% for CA125 estimation alone. The NPV were 99.4% for pelvic examination, 99.5% for TVU and 99.4% for CA125. All detected ovarian cancers were in an advanced stage, and sensitivities and positive predictive values of the screening modalities are low. Restricting the analyses to incident contacts that contained all 3 screening modalities did not substantially change the outcomes. Annual gynecological screening of women with a BRCA1/2 mutation to prevent advanced stage ovarian cancer is not effective. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

A new <Emphasis Type="Italic">POT1</Emphasis> germline mutation—expanding the spectrum of <Emphasis Type="Italic">POT1</Emphasis>-associated cancers

Melanomas are associated with several hereditary conditions. We present a large family with several family members affected with primary melanomas and dysplastic nevi as well as thyroid cancer and other malignant tumors. Clinical work-up did not reveal a mutation in any of the genes usually considered with evaluation for predisposition to melanoma (BRCA1/2, CDKN2A, CDK4, PTEN, TP53). Whole exome sequencing of five affected family members showed a new variant in POT1. POT1 is associated with the telomere shelterin complex that regulates telomere protection and telomerase access. Germline mutations in POT1 were recently shown to be associated with hereditary predisposition to melanoma. Our findings support a role of POT1 germline mutations in cancer predisposition beyond melanoma development, suggesting a broader phenotype of the POT1-associated tumor predisposition syndrome that might also include thyroid cancer as well as possibly other malignant tumors.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">TP53</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">CDKN1A</Emphasis> mutation analysis in families with Li–Fraumeni and Li–Fraumeni like syndromes

Li–Fraumeni and Li–Fraumeni like syndromes (LFS/LFL) represent rare cancer–prone conditions associated mostly with sarcomas, breast cancer, brain tumors, and adrenocortical carcinomas. TP53 germline mutations are present in up to 80 % of families with classic Li–Fraumeni syndrome, and in 20–60 % of families with Li–Fraumeni like phenotypes. The frequency of LFS/LFL families with no TP53 mutations detected suggests the involvement of other genes in the syndrome. In this study, we searched for mutations in TP53 in 39 probands from families with criteria for LFS/LFL. We also searched for mutations in the gene encoding the main mediator of p53 in cell cycle arrest, CDKN1A/p21, in all patients with no mutations in TP53. Eight probands carried germline disease-causing mutations in TP53: six missense mutations and two partial gene deletions. No mutations in CDKN1A coding region were detected. TP53 partial deletions in our cohort represented 25 % (2/8) of the mutations found, a much higher frequency than usually reported, emphasizing the need to search for TP53 rearrangements in patients with LFS/LFL phenotypes. Two benign tumors were detected in two TP53 mutation carriers: an adrenocortical adenoma and a neurofibroma, which raises a question about the possible implication of TP53 mutations on the development of such lesions.     

Prevalence of two <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1</Emphasis> mutations, 5382insC and 300T &gt; G,in ovarian cancer patients from Ukraine

Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer in women worldwide and the leading cause of gynecological malignant diseases-related deaths in women. The most significant risk factor for ovarian cancer is an inherited genetic mutation in one of two genes: breast cancer gene 1 (BRCA1) or breast cancer gene 2 (BRCA2). The germline mutation c.5266dupC (also known as 5382insC or 5385insC) is the most common mutation among Slavic patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer. Missense mutation c.181T?>?G (also known as 300T?>?G or p.C61G) is regarded as the founder change in many Central European countries. We screened 306 ovarian cancer patients diagnosed at different ages by mutagenically separated polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time PCR. A total of 25 BRCA1 mutations were detected (18 cases of 5382insC and 7 cases of 300 T?>?G). The frequency of the BRCA1 5382insC mutation is similar in breast and ovarian cancer patients from Ukraine, but the frequency of 300T?>?G was estimated in Ukraine at first time.