The effect of reference microphone placement on sound pressure levels at an ear level hearing aid microphone

The present study was designed to investigate the effects of reference microphone location on probe tube microphone measures of hearing aid response. The reference microphone of a clinical probe tube microphone system was located either at a position on the cheek (position A) or in close proximity to the microphone of an ear level hearing aid (position B). With sound pressure level (SPL) held constant at the reference microphone, the SPL at the position of the hearing aid microphone was measured at 14 test frequencies using a 1/8-inch condenser microphone. Measures were obtained on ten male and ten female subjects. Results indicated large frequency-dependent deviations in SPL at the hearing aid microphone, compared to that measured at the reference microphone, when the reference microphone was at position A. In the 1200 to 2000 Hz range, the SPL at the hearing aid microphone was as much as 9.5 dB higher than at the reference microphone. There were no large frequency-dependent variations with the reference microphone in position B, but the SPL at the hearing aid microphone location was approximately 3 dB higher than at the reference microphone. Results suggest that estimates of hearing aid output can be affected markedly by the reference microphone location. Clinical implications of the impact of reference microphone location on probe microphone measures of hearing aid gain and saturation sound pressure levels are discussed.     

Effect of earmold fit on predicted real ear SPL using a real ear to coupler difference procedure

OBJECTIVES: The goal of Experiment I was to quantify the SPL entering the ear canal via a secondary pathway created by a vent in the earmold and/or a slit leak around the earmold. The goal of Experiment II was to determine the validity of a real ear to coupler difference (RECD) procedure under conditions that are likely to produce errors (e.g., when hearing aid gain in the low frequencies is minimal and large negative RECD values occur as a result of venting or a loosely fitting earmold). DESIGN: In Experiment I, the SPL entering the ear via the secondary pathway was measured in 61 hearing-impaired children and 13 normal-hearing adults. In Experiment II, traditional probe microphone measures of real ear SPL were compared to the SPL predicted using the RECD procedure in five normal-hearing adults with loosely fitting earmolds. RESULTS: Results of Experiment I indicated that sound entered the ear canal unattenuated at 250 and 500 Hz, regardless of earmold fit, vent size, or subject age. In Experiment II, the largest differences between traditional probe microphone measures of SPL and predicted measures were noted when hearing aid gain was 0 dB and large negative RECD values were present. When hearing aid gain was minimal and the RECD was in the -10 to -22 dB range, predicted values underestimated the real ear SPL by an average of 14 dB. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results of this study apply only to a limited range of conditions found in clinical practice, in those cases, the errors may influence clinical decisions about the type of hearing aid fitted and the amount of gain provided. Potential solutions to this problem are discussed.     

Deriving the real-ear SPL of audiometric data using the "coupler to dial difference" and the "real ear to coupler difference"

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to compare the measured real-ear sound pressure level (SPL) of audiometer output with the derived real-ear SPL obtained by adding the coupler to dial difference (CDD) and real-ear to coupler difference (RECD) to the audiometer dial reading. DESIGN: The real-ear SPL and RECD were measured in one ear of 16 normally hearing subjects using a probe-tube microphone. The CDD transform and the RECD transfer function were measured in an HA1 and an HA2 2-cc coupler using an EAR-LINK foam ear-tip or a customized earmold. The RECD transfer function was measured using the EARTone ER 3A and the Audioscan RE770 insert earphone. RESULTS: The procedures were very reliable with mean differences on retest of less than 1 dB. The mean difference between the measured and derived real-ear SPL was generally less than 1 dB and rarely exceeded 3 dB in any subject. CONCLUSIONS: The CDD measured for an individual audiometer and the RECD measured for an individual ear can be used to derive a valid estimate of real-ear SPL when it has not been possible to measure this directly.     

Audiometric earphone discomfort level and hearing aid saturation sound pressure level for a 90 decibel input signal (SSPL90) as measured in the human ear canal

The acoustical problems involved in matching the saturation sound pressure level for a 90 dB input signal (SSPL90) of a hearing aid to individual discomfort level were investigated. The real ear SPL (RE/SSPL90) produced by a supra-aural earphone used when measuring uncomfortable loudness (UCL), and RE/SSPL90 produced by three different hearing aids at 90 dB SPL input, were measured for nine subjects, using a miniature microphone technique, and compared to the corresponding coupler levels used when matching hearing aid maximum output to UCL. It was found that a hearing aid often gives about 5 dB, and sometimes 10 dB, higher RE/SPLs than the earphone, if the hearing aid output levels, as measured in a 2-cc coupler (IEC126), are equal to the earphone output levels as measured in a 6-cc coupler (NBS9A). It is recommended that a safety margin of at least 5 dB be used in the preliminary fitting when matching hearing aid SSPL90 to the patient's UCL, converted to dB SPL.     

Probe-tube microphone measures in hearing-impaired children and adults

This study was designed to investigate the reliability of real-ear measurements of sound pressure level (SPL) and to compare these values with two coupler measures of SPL. A commercially available probe tube microphone system was used to measure real ear SPL in both children and adults. Test-retest reliability decreased as a function of frequency for both groups and, in general, was slightly poorer for the children. For both groups, coupler to real ear differences were larger for the 2 cm3 coupler than for the reduced volume coupler; however, no significant differences were observed between groups. In addition, a measure of ear canal volume was not found to be a good predictor of coupler to real ear discrepancies.     

Hearing aid saturation and aided loudness discomfort.

Clinical measurements of the loudness discomfort level (LDL) are generally performed while the subject listens to a particular stimulus presented from an audiometer through headphones (AUD-HP). The assumption in clinical practice has been that the sound pressure level (SPL) corresponding to the sensation of loudness discomfort under AUD-HP conditions will be the same as the corresponding to LDL with the hearing aid. This assumption ignores the fact that the distortion produced by a saturating hearing aid could have an influence on the sensation of loudness. To examine these issues, 5 hearing-impaired subjects were each fit with four linear hearing aids, each having a different saturation sound pressure level (SSPL90). Probe-tube microphone measurements of ear canal SPL at LDL were made while the subjects listened to continuous discourse in quiet under aided and AUD-HP conditions. Also using continuous discourse, real-ear coherence measures were made at various output sound pressure levels near LDL. All four hearing aid types produced mean LDLs that were lower than those obtained under AUD-HP conditions. Those hearing aids with higher SSPL90 produced significantly higher LDLs than hearing aids with lower SSPL90. A significant negative correlation was found between real-ear SPL and real-ear coherence. Quality judgments made at LDL indicated that sound quality of hearing aids with higher SSPL90 was preferred to that of hearing aids with lower SSPL90. Possible fitting implications regarding the setting of SSPL90 from AUD-HP LDL measures are discussed.     

The acoustic properties of the infant ear. A preliminary report

This is a preliminary report about the acoustic characteristics of the external ears of infants. A technique was developed to insert a probe tube that is attached to a miniature microphone into the external auditory canals of sleeping infants. The inlet to the microphone was positioned in the lateral half of the external auditory canal. A diffuse sound field (spectral density of approximately 45 dB SPL) was introduced. The microphone output was recorded, and its Fourier Transform was computed. Diffuse-field-to-ear canal sound pressure level transformations were determined for infants ranging in age from newborn to 37 months. Representative sound pressure level transformations are presented. These are shown to vary systematically with the age of the child. The resonance frequency of the external ear is high in the newborns and declines with age. The asymptotic value (approximately 2,700 Hz) is reached during the second year of life. These findings have potential implications for fitting hearing aids on infants and children.     

Customized acoustic transform functions and their accuracy at predicting real-ear hearing aid performance

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the validity of predicting the real-ear aided response by adding customized acoustic transform functions to the performance of a hearing aid in a 2-cc coupler. DESIGN: The real-ear hearing aid response, the real-ear-to-coupler difference (RECD/HA2), and field to behind-the-ear microphone transfer functions were measured in both ears of 24 normally hearing subjects using probe-tube microphone equipment. The RECD/HA2 transform function was obtained using both insert earphones and with the hearing aid/ pressure comparison method. An RECD/HA2 transfer function was also obtained with a customized earmold, ER-3A foam tip, and an oto-admittance tip. RESULTS: Validity estimates were calculated as the difference between the derived and measured real-ear response. The derived response was generally within 5 dB of the measured real-ear response when it incorporated an RECD/HA2 transform function obtained with a customized earmold for the specific ear in question. Discrepancies increased when the RECD/HA2 transfer function was obtained from the same subject but the opposite ear. There were significant differences between the RECD/HA2 transform function obtained with customized and temporary earmolds. As a result, the derived response incorporating these transforms differed significantly from the measured real-ear response obtained with the customized earmold. The insert earphone and the hearing aid RECD/HA2 transfer function were equally valid. CONCLUSIONS: The derived response may be used as a substitute for in situ hearing aid response procedures when it incorporates acoustic transform functions obtained with a customized earmold from the specific ear in question.     

Real-Ear to coupler difference in patients with ear drum perforation.

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of ear drum perforation on real-ear to coupler difference (RECD) in adults. RECD was measured using a probe tube microphone system in 22 patients with ear drum perforations. Twenty-two normal subjects served as controls. For normal subjects, RECD was in good agreement with the values reported in the literature. For the perforated ears, the RECD was up to 8 dB smaller in the frequency range from 0.5 to 1 kHz. There was no significant difference at frequencies below 0.25 kHz and above 1 kHz. A much larger intersubject variability was found in the experimental group. The mean intersubject standard deviation was 4.4 dB in the experimental group as contrasted with 2.2 dB in the control group. Neither the equivalent ear canal volume nor the perforation size appeared to be correlated with the degree of RECD reduction over lower frequencies. These results strongly suggest the need for individual RECD measurements, rather than using the average normal RECD, to appropriately compensate for the reduced transmission of lower-frequency sounds in fitting hearing aids for patients with ear drum perforations.     

Comparisons of speech recognition in noise by mildly-to-moderately hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and FM systems

Four hearing aid arrangements (monaural-omnidirectional, monaural-directional, binaural-omnidirectional, binaural-directional) and a number of FM system-personal hearing aid combinations (including direct input, neck loop, and silhouette inductor--monaural and binaural--and environmental microphone on and off) were evaluated in a school classroom on nine children with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing losses. Two measures of speech recognition in noise were employed. First, the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) yielding 50% identification of spondees was determined using a simple up-down adaptive procedure. Second, word recognition scores were obtained for three amplification arrangements at two different S/Ns (+6 and +15 dB). The average FM advantage over a personal hearing aid was equivalent to a 15-dB improvement in S/N. Activation of the hearing aid microphone caused most of the FM advantage to disappear. The benefit offered by the FM system decreased as the environmental S/N increased but remained significant even at +15 dB. Significant improvement also was found with the use of directional as compared to omnidirectional microphones, both in the hearing aids and FM teacher microphone.     

Probe tube systems: effects of equalization on real ear insertion and aided gain.

In probe tube measures, the method used to equalize the sound field will determine the reference value used in calculating real ear insertion gain (REIG) and real ear aided gain (REAG). Several equalization methods are available with current probe tube systems. This study determined the effects of three equalization methods (substitution, modified comparison, and ipsilateral comparison) on REIG and REAG measures using open and closed earmolds for ear canals varying in circumference. Twelve subjects were selected representing a wide range of ear canal circumferences. Results revealed significant differences for REIG and REAG among the three equalization methods. These differences appear to be due to the different acoustic components included or excluded for each method. The results of this study suggest that the sound field equalization method used for probe tube measures needs to be considered when interpreting the hearing aid gain reported among various probe microphone units. Also, canal circumference may be a quick method for categorizing canal cavity size and appears to influence measured hearing aid gain.     

Comparison of real-ear to coupler difference values in the right and left ear of adults using three earmold configurations

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to compare real-ear to coupler difference (RECD) values in the right and left ear of adults using three earmold configurations. DESIGN: The RECD was obtained from both ears of 18 normal hearing adults by subtracting the HA2 2-cc coupler response from the real-ear response using an ER-3A insert earphone and a swept pure tone on the Audioscan RM500 probe-tube microphone system. The measurements were made with a personal earmold, foam eartip, and oto-admittance tip. RESULTS: The mean difference between the right and left RECD was close to 0 dB for all earmold configurations and was not statistically significant on a repeated-measures analysis of variance (p > 0.05). In 90% of participants, the difference between ears was generally less than 3 dB at 0.5 to 4 kHz. CONCLUSIONS: Cooperative participants with non-occluding wax and normal middle ear function (on tympanometry) show small differences in RECD between the right and left ear, irrespective of the earmold configuration. The study has yet to be extended to the clinical setting where subject cooperation and earmold fit may differ from the present study. In the meantime, the findings from the present study indicate that where an RECD can be obtained from only one ear of a participant, it is probably best to use this to derive real-ear SPL of both ears instead of relying on average age appropriate corrections.     

Estimating the location of probe microphones relative to the tympanic membrane

This experiment investigated the accuracy with which the location of a probe tip relative to the tympanic membrane can be estimated by means of standing waves. The ear canal length of each ear of six adult subjects was measured with a probe tube using a tactile method. A 6-kHz warble tone was then generated, and the position of the standing wave notch in the ear canal was determined using a probe microphone by noting the place where the sound pressure level was at a minimum. The distance of the notch from the tympanic membrane was then calculated. The mean distance of the notch from the tympanic membrane was found to be 14.1 mm. It was concluded that this technique is reliable and suitable for clinical use when it is important that the probe tube be placed within a known distance of the eardrum for accurate measurement of real-ear aided gain.     

Probe tube microphone measures of loudness discomfort levels in children

Loudness discomfort levels (LDLs) have been advocated as a means for selecting the SSPL90 setting of an individual's hearing aid. Kawell, Kopun, and Stelmachowicz (Ear Hear 1988; 9: 133-136) recently developed a procedure to measure LDLs in children. Several procedural cautions, involving the hearing aid stimulus delivery and sound field calibration, have been noted with this method. As a means of overcoming these problems, a new method utilizing insert earphone derived stimuli delivered to a child's ear-mold with probe tube microphone monitoring of real-ear sound pressure level was explored. Twenty children, aged 7 to 14 years, served as subjects. The advantage of the present method lies in the procedural conveniences and the ability to compare real-ear audiometric measures and hearing aid performance.     

Use of the 'real-ear to dial difference' to derive real-ear SPL from hearing level obtained with insert earphones

The electroacoustic characteristics of a hearing instrument are normally selected for individuals using data obtained during audiological assessment. The precise inter-relationship between the electroacoustic and audiometric variables is most readily appreciated when they have been measured at the same reference point, such as the tympanic membrane. However, it is not always possible to obtain the real-ear sound pressure level (SPL) directly if this is below the noise floor of the probe-tube microphone system or if the subject is unco-operative. The real-ear SPL may be derived by adding the subject's real-ear to dial difference (REDD) acoustic transform to the audiometer dial setting. The aim of the present study was to confirm the validity of the Audioscan RM500 to measure the REDD with the ER-3A insert earphone. A probe-tube microphone was used to measure the real-ear SPL and REDD from the right ears of 16 adult subjects ranging in age from 22 to 41 years (mean age 27 years). Measurements were made from 0.25 kHz to 6 kHz at a dial setting of 70 dB with an ER-3A insert earphone and two earmould configurations: the EAR-LINK foam ear-tip and the subjects' customized skeleton earmoulds. Mean REDD varied as a function of frequency but was typically approximately 12 dB with a standard deviation (SD) of +/- 1.7 dB and +/- 2.7 dB for the foam ear-tip and customized earmould, respectively. The mean test-retest difference of the REDD varied with frequency but was typically 0.5 dB (SD 1 dB). Over the frequency range 0.5-4 kHz, the derived values were found to be within 5 dB of the measured values in 95% of subjects when using the EAR-LINK foam ear-tip and within 4 dB when using the skeleton earmould. The individually measured REDD transform can be used in clinical practice to derive a valid estimate of real-ear SPL when it has not been possible to measure this directly.     

Is the real-ear to coupler difference independent of the measurement earphone?

Direct measurement of real-ear hearing aid performance can be obtained using a probe tube microphone system. Alternatively, it can be derived by adding the real-ear to coupler difference (RECD) to the electroacoustic performance of the hearing instrument measured in a 2-cc coupler. Inherent in this derivation is the assumption that the RECD measured with one transducer can be applied to a coupler measurement performed with a different transducer. For the RECD procedure to be valid, it should be independent of the measurement transducer. The Audioscan RM500 is an example of a commercially available real-ear measurement system that incorporates a clinical protocol for the measurement of the RECD. The RECD can be measured on the Audioscan RM500 using a standard EAR-Tone ER-3A insert earphone or the Audioscan's own RE770 insert earphone. The aim of this study was to compare the RECDs obtained with these two earphones. The Audioscan RM500 was used to measure the RECD from the right ears of 18 adult subjects ranging in age from 22 to 36 years (mean 25 years). Measurements were made with the EAR-Tone ER-3A and RE770 insert earphone and three earmould configurations: (1) the EARLINK foam ear-tip; (2) a hard acrylic shell earmould with the same length of acoustical tubing as the foam ear-tip (25 mm); and (3) the shell ear mould with the appropriate length of tubing for a behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aid fitting (approximately 35-45 mm). The results show that the mean RECD was around 3 dB higher at 1.5 kHz with the foam ear-tip when measured with the RE770 earphone than when measured with the ER-3A earphone. The same magnitude of difference was obtained with the shell earmould and 25-mm tubing; however, this increased to 9 dB when the tubing was increased to around 40 mm for a BTE fitting. The difference in mean RECD with the two earphones was statistically significant on a repeated-measures ANOVA for every earmould configuration (p<0.001). The results of this study demonstrate that the RECD procedure that uses an HA2 coupler and earmould is not independent of the measurement earphone. This has important implications for clinical practice.     

Perforation of the tympanic membrane and its effect on the real-ear-to-coupler difference acoustic transform function.

It is not always possible to undertake extensive real-ear measurements, especially in infants and young children. An alternative approach is to estimate the real-ear SPL by use of an acoustic transform function such as the real-ear-to-coupler difference (RECD). This may be used to estimate the real-ear sound pressure level (SPL) obtained from an insert transducer or a hearing instrument. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of tympanic membrane perforation on the RECD transform function. Subjects in the study comprised two groups of 12 individuals aged between nine and 65 years. One group of subjects had a tympanic membrane perforation and was recruited to the study before admission for myringoplasty. There was no evidence of middle ear pathology in the remaining subjects who comprised the control group. An RECD transform function for an insert transducer was measured on each subject using the standard clinical protocol on the Audioscan RM500 real-ear measurement system. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups; mean RECD transform value of the perforation group was 9-12 dB lower than the corresponding value in the control group at audiometric frequencies below 1.5 kHz. This difference is probably due to the perforation acting as a vent and allowing low-frequency acoustic energy to escape into the middle ear cavity. Use of an average RECD transform function to estimate real-ear SPL in subjects with a perforation will overestimate the SPL reaching the tympanic membrane. As a result, the derived real-ear SPL obtained by use of either an insert transducer or a hearing instrument will be overestimated. This has implications for the selection and verification of a hearing instrument. The difference in the mean RECD transform function between the control group and subjects with a tympanic membrane perforation supports the use of individually measured RECD values wherever possible.     

Signal delivery/real ear measurement system for hearing aid selection and fitting.

This report describes a signal delivery/real ear measurement system for application in the hearing aid selection and fitting process. This signal delivery/real ear measurement system provides a means for quantifying a listener's auditory characteristics (e.g., thresholds, loudness discomfort levels) in a manner that is compatible with electroacoustic measures of hearing aid performance. The signal delivery/real ear measurement system consists of a button-type hearing aid receiver coupled to the listener's personal earmold, and a probe tube microphone system to measure the signal level within the occluded ear canal. This signal delivery/real ear measurement system was used to measure detection thresholds and loudness discomfort levels in severe/profoundly hearing-impaired school-age children, with results indicating good test-retest reliability in behavioral responses. The findings presented in this report relate to the intersession electroacoustic variability associated with this instrumentation. In addition, the potential application of this or a similar system for measuring real ear to 2-cc coupler difference values is illustrated and discussed.