Prospective study of short and long regimens of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in in vitro fertilization program.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of a short regimen in ovulation induction in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program. DESIGN: A prospective randomized trial was set up to compare long and short regimens of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist administration for ovulation induction in IVF. SETTING: Aberdeen Assisted Reproduction Unit. PATIENTS: Eighty-seven patients undergoing IVF were randomized between the two protocols. Stimulation regimen was the only variable being tested. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stimulation response and occurrence of luteinizing hormone (LH) surges. RESULTS: There was no difference in the stimulation requirements, response to stimulation, number of follicles aspirated, or the number of oocytes obtained. The fertilization rates, number of embryos transferred, and pregnancy rates were also similar in both groups. Like the long regimen, it prevents the occurrence of a premature LH surge. CONCLUSION: The short regimen is a useful and cheaper alternative in ovarian stimulation of patients undergoing IVF.     

A randomized prospective study on the effect of short and long Buserelin treatment in women with repeated unsuccessful in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles due to inadequate ovarian response

Fifty four women with repeated unsuccessful in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles due to inadequate ovarian response to stimulation with human menopausal gonadotropins (hMG) participated in this study. They were randomized to receive either gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GNRHa), Buserelin, prior to and during induction of ovulation by hMG (Group I—long protocol), or GnRHa starting on the first day of the cycle together with induction of ovulation by hMG (Group II—short protocol). Mean follicular phase serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone (P) levels were significantly lower in Group I than in Group II (P<0.01). Cancellation rate was significantly lower in Group I than in Group II (P<0.01). The long GNRHa protocol resulted in statistically significant lower cancellation rates, more oocytes per pickup (OPU), more embryos trans-ferred per patient, and a higher pregnancy rate. Significantly more hMG ampoules and more treatments days were required in the long GNRHa protocol. Our data demonstrate that the use of GNRHa prior to and during ovarian stimulation with hMG offers a very good alternative for patients with repetitive unsuccessful IVF cycles due to inadequate response.     

Induction of preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist

OBJECTIVE: To use gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) instead of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) to induce oocyte maturation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). DESIGN: Pituitary and ovarian responses to GnRH-a and the outcome of IVF were studied prospectively. Data from patients injected with hCG were analyzed retrospectively. SETTING: Program of IVF at the Rambam (Governmental) Hospital, Haifa, Israel. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: One or two doses of buserelin acetate 250 to 500 micrograms were administered to six patients with moderate response (Estradiol [E2], 1,494 +/- 422 [+/- SD] pg/mL) and 8 patients with exaggerated response (E2, 7,673 +/- 3,028 pg/mL) to gonadotropin stimulation. Progesterone (P) and E2 were administered for luteal support. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist effectively triggered luteinizing hormone (LH)/follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) surge. Mature oocytes were recovered in all patients. Luteal E2 and P were lower than in patients injected with hCG. No signs of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were observed. RESULTS: Serum LH and FSH rose over 4 and 12 hours, respectively, and were significantly (P less than 0.05) elevated for 24 hours. Of all mature oocytes, 67% fertilized and 82% cleaved. Four pregnancies were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: A bolus of GnRH-a is able to trigger an adequate midcycle LH/FSH surge, resulting in oocyte maturation and pregnancy. Our preliminary results also suggest that it allows a more accurate control of ovarian steroid levels during the luteal phase and may prevent the clinical manifestation of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.     

The routine use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for all patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Is there any medical advantage? A prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the routine use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) for all patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) produces any significant medical advantage. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. PATIENTS: Three hundred eight patients having their first ever IVF attempt. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly divided into four groups and received either human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) alone for ovarian simulation (group A, n = 81); clomiphene citrate and hMG (group B, n = 77); a 3-day ultrashort course of GnRH-a and hMG (group C, n = 74); or pituitary desensitization with GnRH-a followed by hMG (group D, n = 76). RESULTS: The indications for IVF and mean age of all four groups of patients were comparable. There was a significant difference in the number of embryos cleaved and transferred among the groups, but there were no significant differences in the cancellation rate, mean number of oocytes collected or fertilized, and number of cases of failed fertilization. There were also no significant differences in the pregnancy and live birth rates per cycle commenced or per embryo transfer. CONCLUSION: The routine use of GnRH-a for all patients undergoing IVF has practical but no significant medical advantages.     

Gonadotropin stimulation following GnRH-a priming for poor responders in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer programs.

The effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) administration before gonadotropin superovulation on the stimulation characteristics of poor responder patients was assessed in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program. Thirty consecutive patients who had exhibited low ovarian response (fewer than four retrieved oocytes) in at least two previous IVF cycles (control cycles, n = 60), were eligible for the study. GnRH-a (nafarelin) was administered daily for 7-10 days from the mid-luteal phase of the previous cycle until the first day of menstruation. Menotropin treatment was commenced on cycle day 3 (with no additional GnRH-a) (study cycles, n = 39). A significantly higher number of oocytes was retrieved (p < 0.0002) and a higher number of embryos transferred (p < 0.003) in the study cycles than in the control cycles. No cases of premature luteinizing hormone surge were recorded. Pregnancy rates per embryo transfer and per cycle were 10.4% and 7.7% for the study cycles and 2.8% and 1.6% for the control cycles, respectively. GnRH-a, administered prior to gonadotropin treatment, should be an additional option of ovulation induction protocol for poor responders in IVF programs.     

Serum luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and oestradiol pattern in women undergoing pituitary suppression with different gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue protocols for assisted reproduction.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a) are used widely in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycles for assisted reproduction. At present, there is great debate about the influence of exogenous hormone activity on the hypothalamus-pituitary axis following pituitary desensitization. The objective of this comparative study was to investigate the pattern of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and oestradiol in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with different GnRH-a preparations. We retrospectively analysed 201 women, aged between 27 and 43 years, who were referred consecutively to our infertility clinic between January 2002 and January 2003. All women had no endocrinopathies or occult ovarian failure as assessed by day-3 hormone profile. Women were enrolled in one of the following COS protocols: depot triptorelin long protocol (n = 38), buserelin long protocol (n = 101) or buserelin short protocol (n = 62). Recombinant FSH was used to induce ovulation. Treatment was monitored by transvaginal ultrasound scan and serum measurement of FSH, LH and oestradiol. Among the women initially included, 30 had cancelled cycles due to poor ovarian response. Serum LH levels were significantly higher in the short-protocol group compared with the long-protocol groups (p < 0.001). The number of follicles, oocyte yield, number of grade-I embryos and fertilization rate were significantly lower in the short-protocol group than in the long-protocol groups. These findings showed that LH concentrations are significantly higher in women undergoing reversible medical hypophysectomy with a GnRH-a short protocol than in women treated with a long protocol. The hypothesis of an LH ceiling is confirmed.     

三种促排卵方案对卵巢储备力低下患者助孕效果比较

目的:探讨卵巢储备力低下患者行体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子显微注射-胚胎移植(IVF/ICSI-ET)助孕时较理想的超促排卵方案。方法:将302例行IVF/ICSI-ET助孕的卵巢储备力低下患者分为3组:微刺激方案组(A组,98例)、黄体期促排卵方案组(B组,62例)和超短方案组(C组,142例),比较3组的一般情况、周期取消率、总促性腺激素释放激素(Gn)使用天数(Gn天数)、人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)日血雌二醇(E_2)、促黄体生成素(LH)、孕酮(P)及子宫内膜厚度、平均获卵数、受精率、形成胚胎率、优质胚胎率、临床妊娠率、生化妊娠率。结果:A组的周期取消率均明显高于B、C两组(P0.05);A组的总Gn天数最短,C组的总Gn天数最长(P0.05);A组的HCG日子宫内膜厚度低于B、C组,但差异无统计学意义;A组的HCG日E_2水平、平均获卵数均低于B、C两组,C组的HCG日LH水平均低于A、B两组(P0.05)。3组的一般情况、正常受精率、成胚率、优胚率、临床妊娠率、生化妊娠率均无统计学差异。结论:超短方案可能是较好的卵巢储备力低下超促排卵方案,同时黄体期促排卵亦不失为一种新的有效促排卵方案。     

Short-term use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (Leuprolide) for in vitro fertilization

A common problem encountered by in vitro fertilization (IVF) programs is the premature occurrence of the spontaneous lutenizing hormone (LH) surge during ovarian stimulation cycles. Administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) for 2 to 3 weeks produces a state of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, thus allowing ovarian stimulation to proceed uncomplicated by a spontaneous LH surge. We have elected to treat seven patients with GnRH-a in a short-term protocol, with GnRH-a initiated on cycle day 3 along with exogenous gonadotropins. In this series, we found that the spontaneous LH surge was abolished, while ovarian responsiveness seemed to be improved. These results suggest that the initial surge of gonadotropins elicited by GnRH-a administration may enhance ovarian stimulation and that spontaneous LH surge is blocked when GnRH-a and exogenous gonadotropins are initiated concomitantly.     

Stimulation of endogenous surge of luteinizing hormone with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization

The effect of induction of preovulatory endogenous surge of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) with intranasal administration of GnRH-analog (GnRH-a) in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program is reported. The use of GnRH-a resulted in a significantly better percentage of replaceable embryos (91% versus 85%). The pregnancy rate was 51% in comparison with 32% in control cycles in which follicular maturation was achieved by human chorionic gonadotropin administration. There was no significant difference in the postoocyte recovery serum progesterone patterns between the two groups. Our results indicate that the induction of endogenous LH and FSH surge with GnRH-a may be successfully employed for final follicular maturation after ovarian suprastimulation without affecting the outcome of IVF adversely. Apart from being a more physiological approach to oocyte maturation, it also has potential economic and clinical advantages.     

The routine use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists prior to in vitro fertilization and gamete intrafallopian transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) used in ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) and gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT). DESIGN: Meta-analysis of 10 trials comparing treatment cycle outcomes after GnRH-a (n = 914) with other ovulation induction protocols (n = 722) and 7 trials comparing outcomes after short flare-up (n = 368) with longer suppression (n = 476) GnRH-a protocols. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome of primary interest was clinical pregnancy rate (PR) per treatment cycle commenced. Data describing the amount of gonadotropin used, cycle cancellation rate, clinical pregnancy per ET, and multiple pregnancy and abortion rates were also analyzed. RESULTS: Clinical PR per cycle commenced was significantly improved after GnRH-a use for IVF (common odds ratio [OR] 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33 to 2.44) and GIFT (common OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.24 to 4.51). Clinical PR per embryo transfer was also significantly improved with GnRH-a use (common OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.95). Cycle cancellation was decreased (common OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.44), whereas spontaneous abortion rate was similar with and without GnRH-a use. Cycle cancellation and PRs after short flare-up and longer suppression protocols were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis supports the routine use of GnRH-a for IVF and GIFT. Further research is needed, however, to assess the potential for increased rates of multiple pregnancy and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, which may be associated with this treatment.     

Serum luteinizing hormone,follicle-stimulating hormone and oestradiol pattern in women undergoing pituitary suppression with different gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue protocols for assisted reproduction

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a) are used widely in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycles for assisted reproduction. At present, there is great debate about the influence of exogenous hormone activity on the hypothalamus–pituitary axis following pituitary desensitization. The objective of this comparative study was to investigate the pattern of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and oestradiol in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with different GnRH-a preparations. We retrospectively analysed 201 women, aged between 27 and 43 years, who were referred consecutively to our infertility clinic between January 2002 and January 2003. All women had no endocrinopathies or occult ovarian failure as assessed by day-3 hormone profile. Women were enrolled in one of the following COS protocols: depot triptorelin long protocol (n?=?38), buserelin long protocol (n?=?101) or buserelin short protocol (n?=?62). Recombinant FSH was used to induce ovulation. Treatment was monitored by transvaginal ultrasound scan and serum measurement of FSH, LH and oestradiol. Among the women initially included, 30 had cancelled cycles due to poor ovarian response. Serum LH levels were significantly higher in the short-protocol group compared with the long-protocol groups (p?<?0.001). The number of follicles, oocyte yield, number of grade-I embryos and fertilization rate were significantly lower in the short-protocol group than in the long-protocol groups. These findings showed that LH concentrations are significantly higher in women undergoing reversible medical hypophysectomy with a GnRH-a short protocol than in women treated with a long protocol. The hypothesis of an LH ceiling is confirmed.     

Gonadotropin stimulation following GnRH-a priming for poor responders in in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer programs

The effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) administration before gonadotropin super-ovulation on the stimulation characteristics of poor responder patients was assessed in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program.

Thirty consecutive patients who had exhibited low ovarian response (fewer than four retrieved oocytes) in at least two previous IVF cycles (control cycles, n = 60), were eligible for the study. GnRH-a (nafarelin) was administered daily for 7–10 days from the mid-luteal phase of the previous cycle until the first day of menstruation. Menotropin treatment was commenced on cycle day 3 (with no additional GnRH-a) (study cycles, n = 39).

A significantly higher number of oocytes was retrieved (p < 0.0002) and a higher number of embryos transferred (p < 0.003) in the study cycles than in the control cycles. No cases of premature luteinizing hormone surge were recorded. Pregnancy rates per embryo transfer and per cycle were 10.4% and 7.7% for the study cycles and 2.8% and 1.6% for the control cycles, respectively.

GnRH-a, administered prior to gonadotropin treatment, should be an additional option of ovulation induction protocol for poor responders in IVF programs.     

微刺激促排卵在IVF/ICSI卵巢低反应患者中的应用

目的:探讨微刺激促排卵在IVF/ICSI卵巢低反应患者中的应用。方法:回顾性分析进行IVF/ICSI助孕的卵巢低反应患者共114个周期,根据用药情况分为3组:A组(来曲唑组,34个周期),B组(克罗米芬组,41个周期),C组(短方案组,39个周期)。比较3组患者的一般情况、Gn使用天数及总量、IVF相关指标及助孕结局。结果:①年龄、体质量指数(BMI)、不孕年限、基础内分泌水平组间比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。②A组Gn使用天数及总量、hCG注射日E2水平、优质胚胎率低于C组(P<0.05);hCG注射日LH水平、提前排卵率高于C组(P<0.05);平均获卵数、受精率、卵裂率、着床率、临床妊娠率A组与C组间比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。③B组Gn使用天数及总量、hCG注射日E2水平、平均获卵数、卵裂率均低于C组(P<0.05);hCG注射日LH水平高于C组(P<0.05);提前排卵率、受精率、优质胚胎率、着床率、临床妊娠率B组与C组间均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。④B组Gn使用天数及总量高于A组(P<0.05);其余相关指标组间比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:微刺激方案可以获得与GnRH-a短方案相近的临床效果,同时降低Gn使用总量,减轻患者单周期治疗费用,是卵巢储备功能低下患者较理想的促排卵方案。     

Management of poor responders in IVF

Correct controlled ovarian stimulation is of paramount importance in assisted reproductive technologies. Therefore, analysis of the ovarian reserve of the patient is mandatory to tailor the best ovarian stimulation regimen. When the ovarian reserve is reduced, the induction of a multifollicular growth remains a challenge. Several factors could be associated with reduced ovarian response. However, reduced ovarian reserve either in older patients or in young patients represents the most frequent aetiological factor. Whatever is the aetiology, one of the main problems is how to predict a reduced ovarian response, and although several tests have been suggested, no very accurate predictive test is available. A variety of different stimulation protocols have been suggested but the lack of any large-scale, prospective, randomized, controlled trials of the different management strategies and the lack of a uniform definition of the population may result in comparisons of heterogeneous groups of patients, making it difficult to draw any definitive conclusions. Natural cycle IVF may represent an easy and cheap approach in the management of this group of patients. Although no controlled large prospective randomized studies are available to compare the natural IVF procedure with ovarian stimulation IVF in poor responder patients, the efficacy of natural cycle IVF is hampered by high cancellation rates mainly due to untimely LH surge. The use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists in the late follicular phase, which reduces the premature LH rise rate, and the improvements in laboratory conditions and fertilization techniques, increase the embryo transfer rates, making this procedure more cost-effective.     

The long protocol of administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist is superior to the short protocol for ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether pituitary desensitization with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a), buserelin acetate, before the administration of human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) is superior to the simultaneous administration of both hormones at the beginning of the treatment cycle. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. PATIENTS: Ninety-one patients having their first attempt at IVF. INTERVENTIONS: Patients in group 1 (long protocol) were administered subcutaneous (SC) buserelin acetate 200 micrograms/d from day 1 of the menstrual cycle, and hMG was started only after pituitary desensitization had been achieved at least 14 days later. Patients in group 2 (short protocol) were administered SC buserelin acetate 200 micrograms/d from day 2 and the same dose of hMG used in the long protocol from day 3 of the menstrual cycle. RESULTS: The median total amount of hMG required in both groups was comparable. There were significantly more follicles (P = 0.0001), oocytes (P = 0.0008), fertilized oocytes (P = 0.0001), and cleaved embryos (P = 0.0001), and a higher fertilization rate (P = 0.0047) in patients in group 1. The pregnancy rates per initiated cycle and per embryo transfer were 19.57% and 25.71% in group 1 compared with 8.89% and 16.67% in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: The long protocol is superior in terms of significantly greater follicular recruitment, oocyte recovery and fertilization rates, and significantly greater number of embryos available for transfer. In general, it is the preferred method when GnRH-a are used for ovarian stimulation in IVF.     

The effect of growth hormone supplementation on in vitro fertilization outcome: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of growth hormone (GH) supplementation to a long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a)/human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) treatment protocol, on ovarian response, embryo quality, and clinical outcome in in vitro fertilization (IVF). DESIGN: Growth hormone or placebo were administered in a prospective randomized double-blind manner. PATIENTS: Forty-two normal ovulatory, women who were 38 years of age or less with mechanical factor infertility and a normal male factor were selected for this study. INTERVENTIONS: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, 0.5 mg/d, was initiated in the midluteal phase of the preceding cycle and continued until the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration. Ovulation induction with hMG was started 14 days after pituitary down regulation (17 beta-estradiol [E2] serum level less than 30 pg/mL). Growth hormone (12 IU/d) or placebo were administered on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 of hMG treatment. RESULTS: Breaking the code at the completion of the study revealed that 20 women received GH and 22 placebo. The age and duration of infertility did not differ between the two groups. Follicular phase duration, hMG ampules used, serum E2, and number of follicles (greater than or equal to 14 mm) on day of hCG as well as number of oocytes and embryos achieved were similar in both groups. Embryo morphology and rate of cleavage were also similar. Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) serum levels did not change after pituitary down regulation and increased significantly both after GH/hMG and placebo/hMG ovulation induction treatment. Clinical pregnancy rate (PR) per embryo transfer and implantation rate were 40% versus 32% and 17.9% versus 11.3% in the GH and placebo groups, respectively, and were not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: In normo-ovulatory women undergoing ovulation induction for IVF, GH supplementation to hMG after GnRH-a pituitary down regulation does not seem to augment ovarian response or improve embryo quality. The effect of this regimen on actual PRs and implantation rates needs further clarification.     

A prospective randomized comparison between long and discontinuous-long protocols of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for in vitro fertilization

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of a discontinuous-long protocol in an IVF program.

Design: Prospective randomized study.

Setting: University hospital.

Patient(s): One hundred thirty-seven IVF cycles of 92 patients in an outpatient IVF program from April 1995 to December 1995.

Intervention(s): In the discontinuous-long protocol group (n = 68), GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) was administered from the luteal phase until cycle day 7, when pure FSH administration was begun. In the long protocol group (n = 69), GnRH-a was administered until the day before hCG administration.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Serum LH and ovarian steroid hormone levels, and IVF outcome.

Result(s): The period and the total dosage of hMG were increased in the discontinuous-long protocol group. Although the fertilization rate was similar under both protocols, the number of embryos transferred was smaller and the cancellation rate was higher in the discontinuouslong protocol group because of the greater failure of oocyte retrieval and fertilization. Serum E₂ levels in the late follicular phase were lower in the discontinuous-long protocol group.

Conclusion(s): Early discontinuation of GnRH-a is not beneficial because of its adverse effects on follicular development.     

Low dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatments with early discontinuation for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in an<Emphasis Type="Italic">in vitro</Emphasis> fertilization program

Aim:  The purpose of the present study was to investigate the applicability of a protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) featuring early discontinuation of low dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) for ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization (IVF).
Methods:  Four hundred and eighty-seven women undergoing 555 IVF cycles were recruited into the study. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was achieved by using either a short protocol of low dose GnRHa (for 5 days only; groups 1 and 2) or a modified long protocol with early discontinuation of GnRHa (groups 3 and 4). Groups 1 and 3 received urinary follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and groups 2 and 4 received recombinant FSH. Oocyte retrieval was performed 34 to 36 h after human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection, followed by embryo transfer 3 days later.
Results:  Luteinizing hormone (LH) levels on the hCG injection day were lower with the modified long protocol (groups 3 and 4) than with the short 5-day treatment (groups 1 and 2). There were higher LH levels in group 1 than in groups 2, 3 and 4, resulting in a worse fertilization rate and clinical pregnancy rate. There were no statistically significant differences between groups 2, 3 and 4 in the rates of fertilization, clinical pregnancy and delivery. A higher estradiol (E₂) level in group 3 than in groups 1, 2 and 4 resulted in a worse implantation rate.
Conclusion:  Early cessation of GnRHa may not induce a premature LH surge in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, while a low dose also offers a useful alternative to a long protocol of IVF. Ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) is considered to be favorable in this low dose GnRHa treatment. (Reprod Med Biol 2003; 2 : 25–30)     

The comparison of two gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in an in vitro fertilization program.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a), buserelin acetate and leuprolide acetate [LA], used in combination with gonadotropins in ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). DESIGN: Randomized prospective study. SETTING: Assisted Reproduction Unit of the Hospital Clínic i Provincial in Barcelona. PATIENTS: Thirty-five pairs of IVF patients who were matched on age, indication, and number of attempts. These women were randomized to receive either buserelin acetate plus gonadotropins (group B) or LA plus gonadotropins (group L). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Luteolysis, ovarian response, and IVF outcome. RESULTS: The mean time for total ovarian arrest and the total dose of gonadotropins and estradiol levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration were similar in the two groups of patients. The number of follicles punctured, the number of oocytes retrieved, and the percentage of mature oocytes in group L were significantly higher. The number of embryos suitable for replacement and cryopreservation was higher in group L compared with group B approaching statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Our results warrant further studies to compare different GnRH-a as therapeutic tools in IVF.     

Ovarian response and pregnancy outcome related to midfollicular LH levels in down-regulated women undergoing assisted reproduction

OBJECTIVE: To assess ovarian response and pregnancy outcome related to midfollicular luteinizing hormone (LH) levels in normogonadotropic women down-regulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonist (GnRH-a) (daily and depot) during an assisted reproduction cycle. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective randomized trial, 50 women were down-regulated with leuprorelin, 0.5 mg/d subcutaneously (group A) and 50 with leuprorelin, 3.75 mg depot (group B), prior to ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Midfollicular serum LH levels < or = 0.5 mIU/mL (subgroups A1 and B1) versus > 0.5 mIU/mL (subgroups A2 and B2) were considered. A comparative analysis was carried out on the clinical effects (duration of stimulation, total FSH dose, number of oocytes retrieved and pregnancy rate). RESULTS: Maximum estradiol levels and pregnancy rates were higher in subgroups A2 and B2, with LH > 0.5 mIU/mL. No differences were observed in the cumulative amount of gonadotropin used, number of oocytes retrieved or fertilization rate. CONCLUSION: When FSH only is used for ovarian stimulation, very low LH serum concentrations in normogonadotropic women profoundly suppressed with GnRH-a, especially if given as a depot, may adversely affect in vitro fertilization outcome.