Faropenem: review of a new oral penem

Faropenem medoxomil is a new orally administered penem antibiotic. Its chiral tetrahydrofuran substituent at position C2 is responsible for its improved chemical stability and reduced CNS effects, compared with imipenem. Faropenem demonstrates broad-spectrum in vitro antimicrobial activity against many Gram-positive and -negative aerobes and anaerobes, and is resistant to hydrolysis by nearly all β-lactamases, including extended-spectrum β-lactamases and AmpC β-lactamases. However, faropenem is not active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, comparative (not vs placebo) clinical trials of acute bacterial sinusitis (ABS), acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections (uSSSIs) have demonstrated that faropenem medoxomil has equivalent efficacy and safety compared with cefuroxime, clarithromycin, azithromycin, amoxicillin, cefpodoxime and amoxicillin–clavulanate. The evidence supports faropenem medoxomil as a promising new oral β-lactam with proven efficacy and safety for the treatment of a variety of community-acquired infections. However, the US FDA recently rejected faropenem for all four indications stating that the clinical trials in ABS and AECB should have been performed versus a placebo. In the CAP studies, the FDA stated that they could not be certain of the validity of the study population actually having the disease and for uSSSI, the FDA stated that only a single trial was not adequate evidence of efficacy for this indication.     

Faropenem,a new oral penem: antibacterial activity against selected anaerobic and fastidious periodontal isolates

The in vitro activity of faropenem, an oral penem, was compared with those of penicillin, co-amoxiclav, cefoxitin, clindamycin, erythromycin and metronidazole against 106 isolates of anaerobic pathogens involved in systemic infections. The organisms tested comprised Porphyromonas gingivalis (29), Prevotella spp. (eight), Prevotella melaninogenica (seven), Prevotella intermedia (five), Actinomyces spp. (25), Fusobacterium nucleatum (14), Peptostreptococcus spp. (11), Bacteroides ureolyticus (five) and Bacteroides forsythus (two). The antimicrobial properties of faropenem were investigated by studying MICs, MBCs, time-kill kinetics and post-antibiotic effect (PAE). Faropenem was highly active against all the anaerobes tested (MIC(90) < or = 0.5 mg/L) and was bactericidal against both beta-lactamase-positive and -negative anaerobes, with a maximum bactericidal effect at 10 x MIC at between 12 and 24 h. In addition, faropenem had an in vitro PAE on all the tested isolates and this was not influenced by beta-lactamase production. Faropenem may be useful for treating infections caused by periodontal bacteria or oral flora.     

Pharmacokinetics of FCE 22891, a new oral penem.

FCE 22891 is the oral prodrug of FCE 22101, a new broad-spectrum penem. The pharmacokinetics of FCE 22891 after single-dose administration, its absolute bioavailability, and the effect of food intake on its absorption were investigated in three different randomized crossover studies in healthy volunteers. Drug levels in blood and urine were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography and bioassay. For optimal comparison of the results of all studies, and since there was good agreement of both methods, only the high-pressure liquid chromatography results are included. The pharmacokinetics of the penem were linear, and its bioavailability after oral administration was 42 +/- 11%. Food intake increased the total area under the curve from 0 h to infinity from 11.9 +/- 3.5 to 14.1 +/- 2.4 mg.h/liter. A specific side effect, i.e., bladder complaints, was registered in some volunteers taking FCE 22891 at doses greater than or equal to 1.0 g.     

Comparative in vitro activity of Sch 29,482, a new oral penem, against Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

The in vitro activity of Sch 29,482, a new oral beta-lactam antimicrobial agent, was compared with those of norfloxacin, rosoxacin, ampicillin, erythromycin, and tetracycline against 142 Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains. Sch 29,482 was as active as norfloxacin and rosoxacin. Its activity was greater than the other three antimicrobial agents. It inhibited 90% of the isolates, regardless of beta-lactamase activity, at a concentration of less than or equal to 0.06 micrograms/ml.     

In vitro antibacterial activity and beta-lactamase stability of SY5555, a new oral penem antibiotic.

The antibacterial activity of SY5555, a new oral penem antibiotic, was compared with those of cefaclor, cefixime, and cefteram. SY5555 was more active than the comparison agents against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis, Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, Morganella morganii, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Clostridium spp., and Bacteroides fragilis. Against Providencia spp., Proteus spp., and Haemophilus influenzae, SY5555 was less active than cefixime or cefteram. SY5555 was inactive against methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Enterococcus faecium, Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Xanthomonas maltophilia, as were the comparison agents. The bactericidal activities of SY5555, cefixime, and cefteram were at or slightly greater than the MICs for clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. SY5555 was not hydrolyzed by various types of beta-lactamases. However, SY5555 and the comparison agents were hydrolyzed by X. maltophilia (L-1) and P. aeruginosa/pMS354 beta-lactamases, two Bush group 3 beta-lactamases, SY5555 showed a high affinity, as did cefixime and cefteram, for cephalosporinases from C. freundii GN7391 and E. cloacae GN7471 strains. These results suggest that SY5555 may be more specific than existing beta-lactam antibiotics.     

Antibacterial activity of HRE 664, a new parenteral penem.

The antibacterial activity of the new penem compound HRE 664 was evaluated in 451 clinical isolates, including ampicillin-resistant members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter spp., Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, and beta-hemolytic streptococci, and compared with those of piperacillin, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, aztreonam, imipenem, and the penem compound Sch 34343. The new agent HRE 664 exhibited antibacterial activity comparable to that of the penem Sch 34343 and imipenem. The MICs of the new agent HRE 664 for 90% of the strains tested ranged from 1 to 4 micrograms/ml against Enterobacteriaceae and were 0.06 micrograms/ml for Staphylococcus aureus and 0.125 micrograms/ml for beta-hemolytic streptococci.     

In vitro activity of CGP 31608, a new penem.

The in vitro activity of CGP 31608, a semisynthetic penem derivative, was compared with that of Sch 34343, imipenem, cefoxitin, cefuroxime, and ceftazidime and other beta-lactams, when appropriate, against 628 recent isolates and other beta-lactam-resistant strains. The MICs of CGP 31608 against 90% of the members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria spp., Bacteroides spp., Clostridium spp., staphylococci, and Streptococcus pneumoniae were between 0.25 and 8 micrograms/ml. The susceptibility of beta-lactamase-producing strains and known porin mutants of the Enterobacteriaceae suggests that CGP 31608 is resistant to many important beta-lactamases (including the mutationally derepressed chromosomal enzymes) and is not excluded from the bacterial cell in strains expressing these known porin mutations. Generally, CGP 31608 was less active than imipenem, Sch 34343, and the cephalosporins, except against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The activity of CGP 31608 against Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant strains) was greater than that of the cephalosporins. The major target site in Escherichia coli K-12 for CGP 31608 was penicillin-binding protein 2. The serum protein binding of 5 micrograms of CGP 31608 per ml was 14%, and serum had little effect on activity.     

Activity in vitro of CGP 31608, a new penem antibacterial agent

The in-vitro activity of CGP 31608 (hereinafter termed CGP), a new penem, was tested by an agar dilution technique in comparison with imipenem, Sch 34343, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, aztreonam, ampicillin, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin. 480 clinical isolated were tested, some of which were selected because of their multiple resistance. CGP showed consistent activity against a wide range of species, having MIC90 values of 2-8 mg/l for almost all Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp., Haemophilus spp., Corynebacterium spp. and Bacteroides spp. It was the most active agent tested against staphylococci having an MIC90 of 0.25 mg/l, showing no reduction in activity against methicillin-resistant strains. Lesser activity was observed against some streptococci, Proteus spp. and clostridia. Tests carried out in broth demonstrated that CGP activity was constant over a pH range of 6-8 and was unaffected by the presence of 50% serum or 50% urine. The rate of killing of CGP, gentamicin, cefotaxime and ciprofloxacin was investigated in broth against log and stationary-phase cultures of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. The most rapid rate of kill was seen with ciprofloxacin, while CGP exhibited a more rapid bactericidal effect than cefotaxime against Staph. aureus. The stability of CGP was studied at two concentrations in serum, broth and phosphate buffer at 4 degrees C, room temperature and 37 degrees C. In serum the half-life was 112 h at 4 degrees C, 35 h at room temperature and 11.4 h at 37 degrees C. Protein binding tested at concentrations of 5-100 mg/l was 2-6.3%.     

In vitro antibacterial activity of men 10700, a new penem antibiotic

We report here the antibacterial activity of the new penem antibiotic Men 10700 against a total of 740 gram-positive and gram-negative clinical isolates, in comparison to imipenem, meropenem, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin and gentamicin. Men 10700 has shown a wide spectrum of antibacterial activity, with a potent activity both against gram-positive species (with the exception of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis) as indicated by minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC(90)) values < or =0.5 mg/l, and gram-negative species, with MIC(90) values generally < or =2 mg/l. Men 10700 was the most potent antibiotic against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and S. epidermidis, while the overall spectrum of activity resembled that of imipenem; meropenem was more active against most gram-negative species. In comparison with third-generation cephalosporins, Men 10700 demonstrated superior activity against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and S. epidermidis and some gram-negative species such as Morganella morganii, Serratia spp. and Enterobacter cloacae; moreover, in contrast to third-generation cephalosporins, Men 10700 showed moderate activity against Enterococcus spp. The activity of Men 10700 against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (10 strains) and some gram-negative strains selected for their resistance to cefotaxime (20 strains) was particularly interesting. Copyright Copyright 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel.     

Repaglinide,a new oral antidiabetic agent: a review of recent preclinical studies

Repaglinide is a new carbamoylmethyl benzoic acid derivative that is structurally related to meglitinide. In common with all active oral hypoglycaemic agents, it displays a comparable U-shaped configuration. Repaglinide exerts its effects by binding to a site on the plasma membrane of β-cells, thereby closing ATP-sensitive potassium channels. This causes depolarization of the β-cell and the opening of voltage-sensitive calcium channels allowing the influx of extracellular calcium ions. This increase in intracellular calcium, in turn, stimulates insulin release. The insulinotropic effect of repaglinide is not related to its ionophoretic capacity. Repaglinide does not cause insulin release in the absence of exogenous glucose, nor does it inhibit the biosynthesis of proinsulin. In vivo administration of an ester of succinic acid potentiates the insulin secretory response to concomitantly administered repaglinide. Repaglinide causes a more rapid increase in plasma insulin levels in rats than either glibenclamide or glimepiride.     

Repaglinide, a new oral antidiabetic agent: a review of recent preclinical studies

Repaglinide is a new carbamoylmethyl benzoic acid derivative that is structurally related to meglitinide. In common with all active oral hypoglycaemic agents, it displays a comparable U-shaped configuration. Repaglinide exerts its effects by binding to a site on the plasma membrane of β-cells, thereby closing ATP-sensitive potassium channels. This causes depolarization of the β-cell and the opening of voltage-sensitive calcium channels allowing the influx of extracellular calcium ions. This increase in intracellular calcium, in turn, stimulates insulin release. The insulinotropic effect of repaglinide is not related to its ionophoretic capacity. Repaglinide does not cause insulin release in the absence of exogenous glucose, nor does it inhibit the biosynthesis of proinsulin. In vivo administration of an ester of succinic acid potentiates the insulin secretory response to concomitantly administered repaglinide. Repaglinide causes a more rapid increase in plasma insulin levels in rats than either glibenclamide or glimepiride.     

MEN 10700, a new penem antibiotic: in vitro antibacterial activity on clinical isolates

MEN 10700 is a new broad-spectrum penem, currently in preclinical development. In the present study, the activity of MEN 10700 was compared to that of imipenem, meropenem, cefotaxime, ampicillin/sulbactam, amikacin and ciprofloxacin against 619 gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial strains, and to that of imipenem, meropenem, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefepime and ampicillin/sulbactam against 38 strains of ciprofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli, and against 19 extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains of the KES group. MEN 10700 was highly active against most gram-positive and gram-negative strains, and overall demonstrated comparable activity to imipenem and meropenem. Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus epidermidis were highly susceptible to MEN 10700, which was the most potent among the antibiotics tested. MEN 10700 was less potent than the carbapenem antibiotics on Morganella morganii, Serratia marcescens and Acinetobacter spp. Ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli were uniformly susceptible to MEN 10700, imipenem and meropenem, with MIC90 values in the range of < or = 0.12-0.25 mg/l, while showing much lower susceptibility to the other antibiotics tested, including the fourth-generation cephalosporin cefepime. This feature was even more evident in ESBL-producing strains of the KES group, with an MIC90 of 1- 2 mg/l for MEN 10700, imipenem and meropenem, and a MIC90 of 16-64 mg/l for the other antibiotics tested, including cefepime.     

Faropenem medoxomil: a treatment option in acute bacterial rhinosinusitis

Faropenem medoxomil is the first oral penem in a new class of beta-lactam antibiotics. Faropenem medoxomil has excellent in vitro activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and other key pathogens implicated in acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. Clinical studies have demonstrated that, in the treatment of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in adults, 7 days of treatment with faropenem medoxomil is as clinically and bacteriologically effective as 10 days of treatment with cefuroxime axetil. One study showed faropenem medoxomil to be superior to cefuroxime axetil. Overall, the safety profile of faropenem medoxomil is similar to that of most comparators. Specifically, the minimal impact of faropenem medoxomil on the gastrointestinal flora leads to less diarrhea and other adverse events than coamoxicillin-clavulanate. Faropenem medoxomil has almost no drug-drug interactions and little requirement for dosage adjustments in the typical acute rhinosinusitis population.     

In vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of a new penem, CGP 31608.

The in vitro activity of CGP 31608, a new penem, against aerobic and anaerobic organisms was evaluated and compared with those of other beta-lactams. CGP 31608 inhibited Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, K. oxytoca, Proteus mirabilis, Citrobacter diversus, and Salmonella, Shigella, Aeromonas, and Yersinia spp. with MICs for 50% of the strains (MIC50s) of 2 to 4 micrograms/ml and MIC90s of 4 micrograms/ml, compared with cefotaxime, ceftazidime, aztreonam, and imipenem MICs of less than 0.25 microgram/ml. MIC90s were 8 micrograms/ml for Enterobacter species and C. freundii, for which other agents had MICs of 32 micrograms/ml, except imipenem, which had equal activity. The MIC90 for Proteus vulgaris, Morganella morganii, Providencia stuartii, and Providencia rettgeri was 8 micrograms/ml, compared with less than 2 micrograms/ml shown by the other agents. Acinetobacter species resistant to other agents except imipenem were inhibited by 4 micrograms/ml, as were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including piperacillin-, ceftazidime-, and gentamicin-resistant isolates. The MIC for P. cepacia, P. fluorescens, and P. acidovorans was less than or equal to 8 micrograms/ml, but that for P. maltophilia was greater than or equal to 128 micrograms/ml. Hemolytic streptococci A, B, C, G, and F were inhibited by less than 1 micrograms/ml, but the MIC for Streptococcus faecalis was greater than or equal to 32 micrograms/ml. MICs for Staphylococcus aureus methicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains were less than or equal to 1 microgram/ml, as were those for methicillin-susceptible and -resistant S. epidermidis. Bacteroides fragilis and Clostridium species and Fusobacterium spp. were inhibited by less than or equal to 4 micrograms/ml. CGP 31608 was not hydrolyzed by plasmid beta-lactamases TEM-1, TEM-2, SHV-1, PSE-1, OXA-2, PSE-4, or by S. aureus. Chromosomal beta-lactamases of type Ia in Enterobacter cloacae P99 and Morganella morganii, Ic in P. vulgaris, K-1 in K. oxytoca, and Id in P. aeruginosa also did not hydrolyze CGP 31608. It inhibited TEM-1, but the 50% inhibitory concentration was 14.2 micrograms/ml compared with 0.15 micrograms/ml for the P99 enzyme. CGP 31608 induced beta-lactamases in P. aeruginosa, E. cloacae, C. freundii and Providencia rettgeri, but there was no increase in MICs for the isolates and it did not select strains derepressed for beta-lactamase production. Synergy of CGP 31608 and gentamicin was found against 90% P. aeruginosa, 60% Enterobacter cloacae, and 50% Serratia marcescens strains. No synergy was found with rifampin. A postantibiotic effect was found against E. coli.     

Comparative in vitro activity of CGP 31608, a new penem antibiotic.

The in vitro activity of a new penem antimicrobial agent, CGP 31608, was compared with those of imipenem, SCH 34343, and several other antimicrobial agents against approximately 600 bacterial isolates. CGP 31608 was active against gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MIC for 90% of the isolates [MIC90], 0.25 microgram/ml) and penicillin-susceptible streptococci (MIC90s, less than or equal to 2 micrograms/ml). Penicillin-resistant streptococci (including enterococci) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus were more resistant to the penem. Activities of CGP 31608 against members of the family Enterobacteriaceae were remarkably uniform, with MIC90s of 8 to 16 micrograms/ml. CGP 31608 was at least as active as imipenem and ceftazidime and more active than piperacillin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Drug activity was not influenced by the presence of any of 10 plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases. Against strains of Serratia marcescens, Enterobacter cloacae, and P. aeruginosa with derepressible chromosomally mediated beta-lactamases, the presence of cefoxitin did not induce increased resistance to CGP 31608. The new drug was also active against anaerobes (MIC90s, 0.25 to 8 micrograms/ml), Haemophilus influenzae (MIC90s, 0.5 to 1.0 micrograms/ml), and Legionella spp. (MIC90, 2 micrograms/ml). CGP 31608 showed an antibacterial spectrum similar to those of imipenem and SCH 34343 (except that the latter is not active against P. aeruginosa) but was generally less potent than these drugs. However, CGP 31608 demonstrated more activity (MIC90) than imipenem against P. aeruginosa, Pseudomonas cepacia, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and S. aureus.     

Risedronate: a new oral bisphosphonate

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates have been effective in the treatment of osteoporosis and Paget's disease of bone. Risedronate, the newest oral bisphosphonate, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and the treatment of Paget's disease of bone. OBJECTIVE: This article reviews current studies of risedronate in osteoporosis and Paget's disease of bone and, to the extent possible, compares risedronate with other bisphosphonates and other therapies. Information on the pharmacokinetics and adverse effects of risedronate, and the drug's use in other disorders, is also reviewed. METHODS: Clinical studies and review articles concerning the use of risedronate published in the English-language literature from 1966 through October 2000 were identified through searches of MEDLINE, PREMEDLINE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts using the search terms risedronate and NE 58095. Recent clinical studies, review articles, and consensus statements regarding the use of other bisphosphonates were identified through searches of the same databases for this period using the search terms bisphosphonates, alendronate, osteoporosis, and Paget's disease of bone. RESULTS: The use of risedronate therapy in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis has been shown to increase bone mineral density (BMD) and decrease the incidence of fractures compared with placebo. In glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, risedronate has been shown to increase BMD without having a consistently significant effect on the risk of fractures. Although there are no direct comparisons between bisphosphonates in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, risedronate appears to be less effective than alendronate and more effective than etidronate in terms of effects on BMD and/or fracture risk. In Paget's disease of bone, risedronate has been reported to be more effective than etidronate in decreasing serum alkaline phosphatase levels and bone pain. Finally, risedronate has been associated with a lower incidence of gastric ulcers than alendronate. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of efficacy in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and the treatment of Paget's disease of bone, risedronate is comparable to alendronate, the other orally available bisphosphonate. It appears to have better gastrointestinal tolerability than alendronate and may be preferred for patients in whom this is a concern. However, direct comparative and pharmacoeconomic studies are necessary to determine risedronate's relative place in the therapy of osteoporosis and Paget's disease of bone.     

Clinical review: Clinical management of new oral anticoagulants: a structured review with emphasis on the reversal of bleeding complications

New oral anticoagulants, including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, have been recently approved for primary and secondary prophylaxis of thromboembolic conditions. However, there is no clear strategy for managing and reversing their anticoagulant effects. We aimed to summarize the available evidence for clinical management and reversal of bleeding associated with new oral anticoagulants. Using a systematic review approach, we aimed to identify studies describing reversal strategies for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. The search was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, HealthSTAR, and grey literature. We included laboratory and human studies. We included 23 studies reported in 37 out of 106 potentially relevant references. Four studies were conducted in humans and the rest were in vitro and in vivo studies. The majority of the studies evaluated the use of prothrombinase complex concentrate (PCC), either activated or inactivated, and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). Other interventions were also identified. Laboratory studies suggest that hemostatic parameters and bleeding might be partially or completely corrected by PCC for rivaroxaban better than dabigatran. Studies in humans suggest that PCC might reverse the effects of rivaroxaban better than dabigatran assessed by hemostatic tests. We were not able to locate studies evaluating the clinical efficacy of these agents. The best available evidence suggests that PCC (activated or inactivated) might be the best option for reversing new anticoagulants. Evidence for rFVIIa is less compelling. There might be differences in the efficacy of reversing agents for different anticoagulants. Studies assessing the clinical efficacy of these reversal agents are urgently needed.     

In vitro antibacterial activity and beta-lactamase stability of CP-70,429 a new penem antibiotic.

In in vitro susceptibility tests, the new penem CP-70,429 showed potent antibacterial activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria except Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Xanthomonas maltophilia. CP-70,429 was stable to various types of beta-lactamases except for the enzyme from X. maltophilia and was 16- to 128-fold more active than the other compounds against beta-lactamase-producing strains of Enterobacter cloacae and Citrobacter freundii.