Vascular response to sirolimus-eluting stents delivered with a nonaggressive implantation technique: comparison of intravascular ultrasound results from the multicenter, randomized E-SIRIUS, and SIRIUS trials.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of SES to reduce the risk of restenosis was initially demonstrated in short lesions using stent implantation with routine pre-dilatation and post-dilatation. This intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy of the E-SIRIUS trial sought to evaluate local arterial responses to sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) delivered with a stent implantation technique allowing direct stenting and only selectively applying high-pressure post-dilatation. METHODS AND RESULTS: IVUS was performed immediately after intervention and at 8-month follow-up in 51 patients randomised to either bare-metal stents (BMS; Bx-Velocitytrade mark; N=20) or SES (Cyphertrade mark N=31). Direct stenting was allowed (24%) and post-dilation was performed only selectively (32%). Lumen dimensions, intimal hyperplasia and vessel remodeling were compared between SES and BMS. Subsequently, results of SES in the E-SIRIUS IVUS substudy (N=31) were compared to those of SES in the IVUS substudy of the SIRIUS trial (N=137). SES in SIRIUS IVUS substudy were delivered with 100% pre-dilatation and 77% post-dilatation. Baseline stent and reference segment measurements were similar between BMS and SES in E-SIRIUS IVUS patients. Using SES there was a 96% reduction in intimal hyperplasia volume within the stented segment (1.8+/-4.9 vs 50.6+/-39.7 mm3, P<0.001) and a significantly larger minimal lumen cross sectional area at 8-month follow-up (4.5+/-1.1 vs 2.3+/-0.9 mm2, P<0.001). No vessel remodeling was observed with the use of SES. The applied stent implantation technique resulted in a minimal stent/reference vessel area ratio of 0.75+/-0.17 in E-SIRIUS SES as compared to 0.84+/-0.23 in SIRIUS SES (P=0.046). Mean intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area at follow-up was 0.1+/-0.2 mm2 in the SES group of E-SIRIUS and 0.5+/-0.8 mm2 in the SES group of SIRIUS (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: An implantation technique of SES which includes direct stenting and minimizes the use of high-pressure post-dilatation results in less optimal stent expansion. However, follow-up results compare very favourable to those of BMS and are characterised by even less intimal hyperplasia than after a more forceful implantation of SES.     

Impact of angiotensin II receptor blockers on the progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis: an intravascular ultrasound study.

BACKGROUND: Although angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) have been found to reduce the coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden in animal models, it is unknown whether ARB have a similar effect on human coronary arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS: Serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies of the left main (LM) coronary artery were performed in 64 patients at baseline and after 7-month follow-up. All patients were divided into 2 groups (ARB group: 23 patients; non-ARB group: 41 patients). Three-dimensional volumetric analysis was done throughout the LM coronary artery, and the volume index (VI; volume/length) was calculated for the vessel (VVI), lumen (LVI), and plaque (PVI). No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in baseline clinical characteristics, including age, gender, blood pressure levels, serum cholesterol levels, the presence of diabetes and smoking status. At baseline VVI, LVI and PVI were similar between the groups. In the non-ARB group, VVI, LVI, and PVI did not change between baseline and follow-up. In the ARB group, PVI significantly decreased during follow-up (9.9 +/-3.1 mm2 vs 9.1+/-2.7 mm2, p<0.01), whereas VVI and LVI were unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary IVUS study suggests that ARB could cause regression of coronary atherosclerosis in humans.     

Vascular effects of sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in diabetic patients: three-dimensional ultrasound results of the Diabetes and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (DIABETES) Trial.

OBJECTIVES: A predefined intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy was performed to evaluate the vascular effects of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) versus bare-metal stent (BMS). BACKGROUND: The Diabetes and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (DIABETES) trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial aimed at demonstrating the efficacy of the SES compared with BMS in diabetic patients. METHODS: Serial intravascular ultrasound analyses were performed in 140 lesions (SES = 75; BMS = 65) immediately after stent implantation and at nine-month follow-up. Vessel, luminal, and stent mean areas and volumes were evaluated at both edges and within the stented segment. Qualitative assessment of residual dissections and stent apposition were also performed. RESULTS: Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between groups. At 9 months, in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) mean area and volume were significantly reduced in the SES group (median NIH area 0.01 mm2 [0.0 to 0.1] vs. 2.0 mm2 [1.0 to 2.9] and median NIH volume 0.11 mm3 [0 to 2.1] vs. 35.3 mm3 [16.6 to 62.6]; both p < 0.0001). In the SES group, stent edges evidenced significant increase in lumen dimensions mainly due to significant increase in vessel volume, whereas those of the BMS group presented vessel shrinkage leading to significant lumen reduction. Late acquired incomplete stent apposition was observed in 11 lesions (14.7%) in the SES group and 0 in the BMS group (p = 0.001). At one year, no stent thromboses occurred in malapposed stents. CONCLUSIONS: The SES implantation effectively inhibits NIH in diabetic patients. The antirestenotic effect of SES is also appreciated at the stent edges. Late acquired stent malapposition is a frequent phenomenon in diabetic patients treated with SES.     

Late incomplete apposition after drug-eluting stent implantation: incidence and potential for adverse clinical outcomes.

AIM: Late-acquired incomplete stent apposition (ISA) has been documented after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation; however, its clinical role remains controversial. We sought to investigate the incidence and long-term clinical consequences of late ISA after implantation of sirolimus- (SES) or paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in a non-selected population. METHODS AND RESULTS: From our database, we analysed 195 consecutive patients who underwent DES placement (175 with SES and 20 with PES) into native artery lesions and had serial intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS) performed at index procedure and after 6-8 months. They were clinically followed for 29 +/- 15 months (median of 24.3 months, interquartile range 18.1-31.6 months). Late ISA was defined as separation of at least one stent strut from the vessel wall in a segment without a side-branch and where the immediate post-implantation IVUS revealed complete apposition of stent struts. We identified 10 patients (5.1%) with late ISA, three patients after PES, and seven patients after SES implantation. ISA was localized almost exclusively at body of the stents (nine out of 10 cases). Mean ISA volume and length were 44.5 +/- 41.9 mm(3) and 7.4 +/- 11 mm, respectively. There was a marked increase in vessel volume from 416.0 +/- 163.9 mm(3) at baseline to 514.4 +/- 247.9 mm(3) at follow-up (P = 0.001) with no significant change in plaque volume (232.4 +/- 52.7 at baseline and 226.4 +/- 22.3 mm(3) at follow-up, P = 0.3) in patients who presented with late-acquired ISA. During the follow-up period, one patient with SES and one patient with PES who presented late-acquired ISA had late stent thrombosis and acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: Late-acquired ISA was observed in 5.1% of patients after DES implantation and is related to regional vessel positive remodelling. The relationship between late-acquired ISA and long-term adverse outcomes (e.g. stent thrombosis) requires further analysis.     

Evaluation of coronary remodeling after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation by serial three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound

This study evaluates the response of the coronary vessel wall to implantation of the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), Bx-VELOCITY, by using serial intravascular ultrasound. SESs have a major impact on the inhibition of in-stent neointimal hyperplasia. However, changes in the vessel wall and behind stent struts in animal models and humans have not been evaluated after SES implantation. Thirty-four patients who received a SES (n = 24) or a Bx-VELOCITY bare stent (BS) (n = 10) for single de novo coronary lesions and had serial motorized pullback 3-dimensional intravascular ultrasound were included. Stent, lumen, and vessel volumes were similar in the 2 groups at baseline. At follow-up, significantly larger lumen and lower neointimal hyperplasia volumes (0.7 vs 33 mm(3), p = 0.001) were seen in the SES group compared with the BS group. There was no significant difference between SES and BS in either the vessel volume (+2.4% vs +0.7%, p = NS) or the plaque behind stent volume change (+3.4% vs +2.5%, p = NS) from after the procedure to late follow-up. The stent edges also showed no significant difference between postprocedural and follow-up measurements, either in patients receiving SESs or BSs. No stented or edge segment required redilatation in the SES group, whereas 2 patients underwent repeat percutaneous coronary angioplasty in the BS group. In the SES group, 1 patient (4%) showed late acquired incomplete stent apposition. Thus, the SES is effective in inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia without affecting vessel volume and plaque behind the stent.     

Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.

AIMS: In many countries, drug-eluting stent implantation is the dominant interventional strategy. We evaluated the clinical, angiographic, procedural, and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: SES implantation was successfully performed in 550 patients with 670 native coronary lesions. Six-month follow-up angiography was performed in 449 patients (81.6%) with 543 lesions (81.1%). Clinical, angiographic, procedural, and IVUS predictors of restenosis were determined. Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, the only independent predictors of angiographic restenosis were post-procedural final minimum stent area by IVUS [odds ratio (OR)=0.586, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.387-0.888, P=0.012] and IVUS-measured stent length (OR=1.029, 95% CI 1.002-1.056, P=0.035). Final minimum stent area by IVUS and IVUS-measured stent length that best separated restenosis from non-restenosis were 5.5 mm2 and 40 mm, respectively. Lesions with final minimum stent area<5.5 mm2 and stent length>40 mm had the highest rate of angiographic restenosis [17.7% (11/62)], P<0.001 compared with other groups. CONCLUSION: Independent predictors of angiographic restenosis after SES implantation were post-procedural final minimum stent area by IVUS and IVUS-measured stent length. The angiographic restenosis rate was highest in lesions with stent area<5.5 mm2 and stent length>40 mm.     

急性冠状动脉综合征患者雷帕霉素洗脱支架晚期贴壁不良及其对临床预后的影响

目的 观察急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者雷帕霉素洗脱支架晚期贴壁不良发生率及其对临床预后的影响.方法 观察2005年2月至2007年3月因ACS(ACS组,54例)和稳定性心绞痛(对照组,83例)行雷帕霉素洗脱支架治疗并于1年后行血管内超声检查患者,检测支架晚期贴壁不良发生率,并观察血管内超声检查后1年内主要不良心血管事件及支架内血栓发生率.结果 所有137例患者219处病变中,16例患者25处病变检测到晚期支架贴壁不良.25处晚期支架贴壁不良中ACS组和对照组分别为20处(22.2%)和5处(3.9%)(P＜0.001).两组患者参照血管外弹力膜面积、参照血管和支架段血管管腔面积和新生内膜面积均相似,但ACS组患者支架段血管外弹力膜面积[(15.34±5.44)mm2比(13.83±4.51)mm2,P=0.026]、支架段血管外弹力膜面积与参照血管外弹力膜面积比值(1.13±0.22比1.02±0.18,P＜0.001)、斑块和中膜面积[(8.43±3.93)mm2比(7.01±2.93)mm2,P:0.002]较对照组明显增大.Logistic多元回归分析显示,ACS(OR=6.477,P＜0.001)和支架长度≥23 mm(OR=3.680,P=0.025)为晚期支架贴壁不良的独立危险因素.血管内超声检查后临床随访1年,两组主要不良心血管事件发生率差异无统计学意义.结论 雷帕霉素洗脱支架置入后,ACS患者较稳定性心绞痛患者更多发生晚期支架贴壁不良,然而随访1年的主要不良心血管事件发生率差异无统计学意义.     

Frequency and characteristics of incomplete stent apposition during and after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation

OBJECTIVES: Incomplete stent apposition (ISA) is frequently observed after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. This study investigated the incidence, morphological features, and possible mechanisms of this phenomenon. METHODS: Fifty-two lesions in 47 eligible patients were treated with SES and serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessment at the time of post-intervention and 8-month follow-up. ISA was carefully identified from the IVUS images of these lesions. Specifically, quantitative two dimensional IVUS analysis was performed if the lesions demonstrated ISA, including routine IVUS parameters as well as other measurements related to ISA. RESULTS: Overall, ISA was observed in 13 lesions (25.0%) at follow-up. Persistent ISA (n = 6, 11.5%), defined as ISA consistently observed both at post-intervention and follow-up, and late-acquired ISA (n = 7, 13.5%)were systematically compared. Eighty-three percent of cases of persistent ISA were located around the stent edges, whereas all cases of late-acquired ISA were in the stent body. In the persistent ISA group, no serial changes were observed in the lumen area or external elastic membrane area (EEMA) from post-intervention to follow-up. However, in the late-acquired ISA group, EEMA and lumen area significantly increased from post-intervention to follow-up (EEMA: 13.4 +/- 3.2 vs 17.6 +/- 3.3 mm2, respectively, p < 0.0001 ; lumen area: 6.7 +/- 1.4 vs 9.2 +/- 1.8 mm2, respectively, p = 0.004). No adverse clinical events were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: ISA was frequently observed during and after SES implantation in clinical practice. No clinical disadvantages were observed during 16 month clinical follow-up periods. Positive remodeling may potentially cause late-acquired ISA.     

Intravascular ultrasound evaluation after sirolimus eluting stent implantation for de novo and in-stent restenosis lesions.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) on neointimal growth and vessel remodelling for in-stent restenosis versus de novo coronary artery lesions using serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 86 patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) (n=41) or de novo lesions (n=45) treated with SES and evaluated by IVUS post-procedure and at follow-up. One 18-mm SES was used for de novo lesions while 16 patients with ISR received >1SES (total stented length 17.9 mm vs 22.0 mm respectively; P=0.004). At follow-up, no differences were observed between the ISR and de novo groups with respect to changes in the mean external elastic membrane (1.7% vs 1.3%; P=0.53), plaque behind the stent (1.2% vs 3.4%; P=0.49), and lumen areas (0.7% vs 1.9%; P=0.58). No positive remodelling or edge effect was observed. A gap between stents was observed in two patients with ISR, where more prominent, though non-obstructive, neointimal proliferation was noted. CONCLUSION: Sirolimus-eluting stenting is equally effective at inhibiting neointimal proliferation in de novo and ISR lesions without inducing edge restenosis or positive vascular remodelling.     

Primary and mid-term outcome of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation with angiographic guidance alone

BACKGROUND: Usefulness and efficacy of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for the implantation of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) is controversial. We investigated the primary and mid-term results of SES deployment with angiographic guidance comparing with IVUS guidance, retrospectively. METHODS AND RESULTS: SESs were deployed in 480 de novo lesions of 459 patients (341 lesions treated without IVUS and 139 lesions treated using IVUS); 368 lesions underwent follow-up coronary angiography. Late luminal loss, in-stent restenosis (ISR) rate and target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate were not significantly different between the non-IVUS group and the IVUS group. There was no acute thrombosis or other major adverse cardiac events except for TLR in both groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that SES implantation without IVUS was not an independent risk factor for restenosis. On the other hand, in one case, target-vessel revascularization was difficult because of the mal-apposition of the SES previously implanted without IVUS. CONCLUSIONS: For lesions for which stent size and endpoint are decided from angiographic information alone, angio-guided SES implantation is safe and provides a good mid-term outcome that is comparable to the IVUS-guided SES stent deployment., while IVUS may be helpful to decide stent size for complex lesions and reduce possible complications.     

Effect of probucol on neointimal thickening in a stent porcine restenosis model

Restenosis after stent deployment remains a major clinical problem. Antioxidants have been proposed as a promising strategy against restenosis. We tested the antioxidant probucol for its efficacy against neointimal hyperplasia in porcine coronary arteries after stent implantation. Probucol was then tested in vivo in 8 coronary arteries of 4 pigs (1000 mg/day orally beginning 7 days before stenting) and was compared to placebo (10 coronary arteries, 5 pigs) 28 days after stenting. Quantitative intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) revealed 38.8 +/- 4.0 versus 40.1 +/- 3.0% area stenosis in the probucol versus control group. Histopathologic assessment showed that probucol had no beneficial effect on inhibiting the neointimal proliferative response in stent lesions compared to placebo (2.35 +/- 0.26 versus 2.88 +/- 0.25 mm(2)), despite similar injury scores (1.20 +/- 0.12 versus 1.28 +/- 0.14). An edge segment (axially 2-mm proximal to the stent margins) was assessed by IVUS. Remodeling index, which is a good marker of constrictive remodeling, was defined by the ratio of the vessel area in the lesion site (stent edge) to the vessel area in the proximal reference site (6-mm proximal to the stent margins). The remodeling index was significantly larger in the probucol group that in the placebo group (1.18 +/- 0.10 versus 0.90 +/- 0.06, P = 0.0012). In conclusion, probucol reduced constrictive remodeling at the edge of the implant but did not inhibit the tissue response within the stent.     

Optimal final lumen area and predictors of target lesion revascularization after stent implantation in small coronary arteries

Despite similar early clinical events, patients who undergo treatment of small vessels are at an increased risk for target lesion revascularization (TLR) after coronary artery stenting. We sought to determine predictors of TLR after stent implantation in small coronary arteries. We identified 423 consecutive patients who underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided small vessel stenting procedures in 465 coronary lesions with an angiographic reference vessel diameter of <2.75 mm. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on a final IVUS lumen area of < or =6.0 mm2 (n=345 lesions, group I) and >6.0 mm2 (n=115, group II). Baseline patient characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were similar between the 2 groups, except for a higher rate of restenotic lesions in group I and bifurcation lesions in group II. Group I had higher TLR rates at 1 year compared with group II patients (39% vs 26%, p = 0.02). The TLR rate appeared to decrease with greater stent expansion, especially at >90% of the reference vessel area, as assessed by IVUS. By multivariate analysis, an IVUS final stent area of < or =6 mm2, diabetes, absence of prior myocardial infarction, and history of intervention were independent predictors of 1-year TLR in this population. Final stent area of >6.0 mm2 and greater stent expansion were associated with a decrease in TLR. Therefore, there does not appear to be any "downside" to aggressive stent implantation strategies in small vessels. In contrast, IVUS allows maximization of final lumen dimensions to minimize clinical restenosis.     

Preintervention arterial remodeling affects vessel stretch and plaque extrusion during coronary stent deployment as demonstrated by three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound

The mechanisms of lumen enlargement during stent implantation may be significantly affected by arterial remodeling. To assess effects of lesion remodeling, we performed 3-dimensional intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analyses in 55 coronary lesions before and after deployment of balloon-expandable stents. Standard quantitative analysis was performed, and arterial remodeling was assessed by the remodeling index (target site divided by mean of proximal and distal reference segment vessel areas), which classified lesions into group A (remodeling index < or =1, negative or intermediate remodeling, n = 40) or group B (remodeling index >1, positive remodeling, n = 15) lesions. Characteristics of the 55 patients and the interventional procedures were similar in the 2 groups. IVUS demonstrated that stenting resulted in increased lumen and vessel dimensions and in a reduced plaque size (p < or =0.001 each) in both group A and group B lesions. The extent of lumen increase inside the stents was almost identical, but resulted from different mechanisms: (1) vessel stretch was greater in group A (p <0.002 at minimum lumen site); (2) plaque compression (or embolization) tended to be greater in group B (p = 0.05, along entire stented segment); (3) plaque redistribution within the stent was observed in both groups (p <0.005 both); and (4) significant (p <0.01) plaque extrusion into the distal reference segment was found in group B only. Thus, the remodeling pattern of coronary lesions has a significant impact on the mechanisms of lumen enlargement during stent deployment. Lesions with positive remodeling show more plaque extrusion into the distal reference and less stent-induced vessel stretch than those with negative remodeling.     

Outcomes of paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in patients with stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery

OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). BACKGROUND: Restenosis and recurrent cardiac events after percutaneous intervention are more common for lesions in the LAD than other native coronary arteries, and often necessitate bypass surgery. Drug-eluting stents may improve the long-term prognosis of this high-risk group. METHODS: In the TAXUS-IV trial, 1,314 patients with single de novo coronary lesions were assigned to implantation of the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent or an identical bare-metal stent; 536 (41%) randomized patients had LAD lesions. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of patients with LAD lesions were well-matched between the randomized groups. Late lumen loss at nine months after paclitaxel-eluting and control stent implantation were 0.28 +/- 0.51 mm and 0.54 +/- 0.57 mm, respectively (p = 0.0004), and binary restenosis rates were 11.3% and 26.9%, respectively (p = 0.004). At one year, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurred in 13.5% of TAXUS-treated patients versus 21.2% treated with the control stent (p = 0.01). The need for bypass surgery at one year was reduced among patients randomized to the TAXUS stent (2.6% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.02). In the proximal LAD subgroup (n = 126), the one-year target vessel revascularization rate was 7.9% with the TAXUS stent and 18.6% with the bare-metal stent (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to bare-metal stents, implantation of polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stents in LAD lesions is safe, and reduces angiographic restenosis and MACE one year. Notably, the need for bypass graft surgery due to restenosis is reduced after TAXUS stent implantation in LAD lesions.     

Two-year follow-up intravascular ultrasound analysis after bare metal stent implantation in 120 lesions.

The objective of this study was to examine long-term changes after bare metal stent implantation in a relatively large number of patients. There are few reports of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies performed on stented and nonstented (reference) segments beyond 6 months after bare metal stenting. Using IVUS, we evaluated serial changes in stented and reference segments between 6 and 24 months after stent implantation in 110 patients with 120 lesions. Serial IVUS images were acquired at five equidistant intrastent sites and at two different reference segment sites. Measurements were made of the external elastic membrane (EEM), stent, lumen, and intimal hyperplasia (IH = stent - lumen) area. For the whole patient group, between 6 and 24 months, the mean IH area in stented segments decreased from 2.6 +/- 1.0 to 2.3 36+/- 0.9 mm2 (P < 0.001), and the mean lumen area increased from 6.2 +/- 2.0 to 6.5 +/- 1.9 mm2 (P < 0.001). The mean IH area decreased in 91 lesions (76%) and increased in 29 lesions (24%) between 6 and 24 months. There were no significant changes in EEM or lumen area in the reference segments. Late angiographic restenosis (diameter stenosis > or = 50%) occurred in three lesions between 6 and 24 months. A late target lesion revascularization was performed for one lesion. In the period of time between 6 and 24 months after stenting, IH regression occurred in most (76%) stent lesions, resulting in late lumen increase. However, IH progression was observed in 24% of in-stent lesions. No significant changes of EEM or lumen area occurred in the reference segments.     

Late incomplete stent apposition after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: a serial intravascular ultrasound analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify the frequency of incomplete stent apposition (ISA) in sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and clarify its findings and clinical sequelae. BACKGROUND: Late-acquired ISA has been reported in bare-metal stents (BMS) and brachytherapy and recently in drug-eluting stents. However, the characteristics of late ISA in SES have not been clarified. METHODS: From the SIRIUS trial, a randomized, multicenter study comparing SES and BMS, serial qualitative intravascular ultrasound (IVUS; at stent implantation and eight-month follow-up) was available in 141 patients (BMS: n = 61; SES: n = 80). The IVUS images were reviewed for the presence of ISA. RESULTS: Incomplete stent apposition at follow-up was observed in 19 patients (BMS: n = 6 [9.8%]; SES: n = 13 [16.3%]; p = NS). Among these, 12 had ISA after intervention and at follow-up (persistent ISA). Late-acquired ISA was seen in the remaining seven cases, all from the SES group (BMS: n = 0; SES: n = 7 [8.7%]; p < 0.05). In late-acquired ISA, there was an increase in external elastic membrane area (after intervention: 16.2 +/- 2.7 m2; follow-up: 18.9 +/- 3.6 mm2; p < 0.05). The location of stent-vessel wall separation was primarily at the stent edges in persistent ISA cases, whereas late-acquired ISA in SES occurred mostly in the mid portion of the stent. There were no negative clinical events reported for any ISA cases at 12-month clinical follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Late ISA was observed in 8.7% of patients after SES implantation. There were no negative clinical events associated with this IVUS finding at 12-month clinical follow-up; however, careful long-term follow-up will be necessary.     

Effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of ostial left anterior descending artery stenosis with intravascular ultrasound guidance

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the clinical and angiographic outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation for ostial left anterior descending (LAD) lesions compared with bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation. BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of SES implantation for ostial LAD lesions is currently unknown. METHODS: Sirolimus-eluting stents were implanted in 68 consecutive patients with ostial LAD stenoses. The control group was composed of 77 patients treated with BMS during the preceding two years. In the SES group, for complete lesion coverage, stent positioning was intentionally extended into the distal left main coronary artery (LMCA) in 23 patients (34%) with intermediate LMCA narrowing. RESULTS: Compared with the BMS group, the SES group had more multivessel involvement, received fewer debulking atherectomies, underwent more direct stenting, had a greater number of stents, and had more segments stented. The procedural success rate was 100% in both groups. The six-month angiographic restenosis rate was significantly lower in the SES group than in the BMS group (5.1% vs. 32.3%, p < 0.001). During the one-year follow-up period, neither death nor myocardial infarction occurred in either group, but target lesion revascularization was less frequent in the SES group than in the BMS group (0% vs. 17%, p < 0.001). In the SES group, there were no restenoses in cases with LMCA coverage, compared with three restenoses (7.9%) in cases with precise stent positioning (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in ostial LAD lesions achieved excellent results regarding restenosis and clinical outcomes compared with BMS implantation. This finding may be associated with reduced neointimal hyperplasia and complete lesion coverage.     

Impact of highly asymmetric stent expansion after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation on twelve-month clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the impact of highly asymmetric stent expansion after sirolimus-eluting stent(SES)implantation on clinical outcomes from post procedure to 12 months later. METHODS: Subjects were 118 patients with 171 lesions who underwent SES implantation for angina pectoris and were studied by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) following the procedure. The stent symmetry index (minimal stent diameter/maximal stent diameter) at the minimal stent area was calculated by IVUS analysis. The patients were divided into two groups for comparative study: those with stent symmetry index > or = 0.7 were classified into the optimal (O) group (93 patients; 145 lesions, mean age 66 +/- 12 years) and those with stent symmetry index < 0.7 were the sub-optimal (S) group (25 patients; 26 lesions, mean age 67 +/- 10 years). RESULTS: Angiographic follow up after 8 months showed no differences in target lesion revascularization (TLR) (O group: 3.1% vs S group: 3.8%, p = 0.833). Multivariate analysis identified the post minimal stent diameter as the independent predictor of TLR (p = 0.038). The stent symmetry index < 0.7 was not a predictor of TLR (p = 0.887). Clinical outcomes after 12 months showed both groups had 0% stent thrombosis and there were no differences in deaths (O group: 2.1% vs S group: 4.0%, p = 0.602). CONCLUSIONS: Highly asymmetric stent expansion after SES implantation may not have a negative impact on clinical outcomes at 12 months.     

Late stent malapposition with marked positive vascular remodeling observed only at the site of drug-eluting stents after multivessel coronary stenting

A 74-year-old woman presented with effort-induced chest pain. Diagnostic coronary angiography revealed three-vessel disease. A successful angioplasty was performed with two sirolimus-eluting stents placed in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and left circumflex artery (LCX). The right coronary artery (RCA) was treated with a bare-metal stent. Follow-up angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessment were performed 8 months later, which showed late stent malapposition (LSM) with marked positive vascular remodeling around the drug-eluting stents (DES) in both LAD and LCX lesions, but there was no evidence of ectatic area around the BMS in the RCA lesion. Compared with the baseline IVUS, a significant increase in external elastic membrane (EEM) cross-sectional area was found. Twenty-seven months later, we performed repeat follow-up angiography. Intravascular ultrasound still showed vessel malapposition. A previous report showed that aneurysmal dilatation of the stented segment with severe localized hypersensitivity reaction could be a potential cause of late thrombosis after DES implantation. If LSM is related to hypersensitivity of the DES, it may have a potential risk of adverse events. Although there is a paucity of data regarding malapposition as the cause of adverse events, careful long-term follow-up of patients with vessel enlargement after DES placement is recommended.     

The Stenting Coronary Arteries in Non-stress/benestent Disease (SCANDSTENT) trial.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the SCANDSTENT study was to evaluate the use of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in complex coronary lesions. BACKGROUND: The use of SES improves angiographic and clinical outcomes compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) in simple coronary artery lesions, but there is limited evidence of their safety and efficacy when implanted in complex lesions. METHODS: We randomly assigned 322 patients with symptomatic complex coronary artery disease to receive either SES or BMS. The lesions were occluded (36%), bifurcational (34%), ostial (22%), or angulated (8%) in morphology. The primary end point was the difference in minimal lumen diameter six months after stent implantation. RESULTS: The patients were well matched in terms of demographic and angiographic baseline characteristics; 18% had diabetes. The reference vessel diameter was 2.86 mm in mean, and the lesion length 18.0 mm. At follow-up, patients who received SES had a minimal lumen diameter of 2.48 mm compared with 1.65 mm in those who received BMS (p < 0.001), a diameter stenosis of 19.3% versus 43.8% (p < 0.001), and 2.0% versus 31.9% developed restenosis (p < 0.001). The rate of major adverse cardiac events was 4.3% with SES versus 29.3% with BMS (p < 0.001), and stent thrombosis was observed in 0.6% in the SES group versus 3.1% in the BMS group (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: The use of SES markedly reduced restenosis and the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events in patients with complex coronary artery lesions without increasing the risk of stent thrombosis.