Therapeutic heparin concentrations augment platelet reactivity: implications for the pharmacologic assessment of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist abciximab

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effect of heparin on the platelet reactivity and the pharmacodynamic profile of abciximab. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ex vivo studies were performed on patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 26) who were at moderate to high risk of ischemic complications. Patients received a 12,000-U bolus of heparin followed by a 0.25-mg/kg bolus of abciximab. Before abciximab treatment, platelet aggregation responses to a variety of stimuli were assessed immediately before and 10 minutes after the heparin bolus. Heparin increased platelet aggregation to 2 and 5 micromol/L adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and 5 microg/mL collagen by 36%, 25%, and 46%, respectively (P < or =.001), but did not influence platelet reactivity to thrombin receptor-activating peptide or 20 micromol/L ADP and had no appreciable effect on platelet surface glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor numbers. To assess the impact of heparin on the pharmacodynamic profile of abciximab, GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and platelet aggregation inhibition estimates obtained after abciximab administration were calculated relative to the basal levels observed both before and after the heparin bolus. At 2 and 24 hours after the abciximab bolus, GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade measurements normalized to either the preheparin or postheparin baseline determinations were equivalent. For all ADP concentrations tested, the 2-hour post-abciximab bolus platelet aggregation inhibition estimates based on the preheparin and postheparin baseline values were comparable. However, for 2 and 5 micromol/L ADP, the 24-hour post-abciximab platelet aggregation inhibition measurements based on preheparin baseline values were significantly lower than postheparin baseline determinations (both P < or =.003). In vitro studies revealed that therapeutic heparin doses induced a concentration-dependent reduction in the extent of platelet inhibition produced by amounts of abciximab that elicit partial inhibition of platelet aggregation. However, at abciximab concentrations that achieved platelet aggregation blockade of >80%, the levels of inhibition of platelet aggregation in the presence and absence of heparin were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative ex vivo and in vitro data indicate that for certain stimuli, heparin alters the platelet inhibitory profile of abciximab at concentrations of the agent that yield partial suppression of platelet function.     

Pharmacodynamic and clinical trials of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and potential relationship of results to dosing

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors have become the standard of care for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and for those presenting with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTE-ACS). Clinical effects of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in PCI and NSTE-ACS strongly correlate with potency, consistency, and durability of platelet aggregation inhibition. Under standardized conditions [light transmission aggregometry (LTA), 20 micromol adenosine diphosphate (ADP) as an agonist, and D-phenylalanyl-L-propyl-L-arginine chloromethyl ketone (PPACK) as an anticoagulant], we demand consistent platelet aggregation inhibition >80% during the time of PCI (initial balloon inflation), and during the entire duration of therapy in NSTE-ACS. The benefit of abciximab (bolus 0.25 mg/kg plus infusion 10 microg/kg/min) correlates with >80% inhibition of platelet aggregation during the intervention (PCI) and immediately thereafter (<6 hours). The absence of a benefit with abciximab in NSTE-ACS is most likely due to <80% inhibition during the major part of the infusion period (>6 hours). Tirofiban does not achieve >80% inhibition at the time of PCI at a dose of 10 microg/kg bolus plus 0.15 microg/kg/min infusion, and at a dose of 0.4 lg/kg/min loading infusion for 30 minutes plus 0.1 microg/kg/min maintenance infusion, the target value is only reached after 18 h. Eptifibatide (double-bolus 180 microg/kg 10 min apart, followed immediately by a 2.0 microg/kg/min infusion) provided an instant, consistent, and durable antiplatelet effect for the entire duration of infusion, and a significant clinical benefit in both PCI (non-ACS patients) and medically managed NSTE-ACS patients.     

Antiplatelet effects of abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide in patients undergoing coronary stenting

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate whether abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide achieve comparable antiplatelet effects with coronary stenting. BACKGROUND: The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide differ in chemical structure, binding site and pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing coronary stenting were randomly assigned to abciximab (bolus 0.25 mg/kg body weight, infusion 10 microg per min for 12 h), tirofiban (bolus 10 microg/kg, infusion 0.15 microg/kg per min for 72 h) or eptifibatide (bolus 180 microg/kg, infusion 2 microg/kg per min for 72 h). We took serial blood samples to analyze platelet function by using flow cytometry, turbidimetric aggregometry and the rapid platelet-function assay (RPFA). RESULTS: As assessed by RPFA, platelet aggregation after 2 h of infusion was reduced to 5.9 +/- 7.8% (mean +/- SD) of baseline by abciximab, to 5.0 +/- 5.4% by tirofiban and to 7.8 +/- 7.1% by eptifibatide (p = 0.42). Turbidimetric aggregometry with adenosine diphosphate stimulation yielded similar results, whereas percent inhibition of platelet aggregation after thrombin receptor stimulation was 45.8 +/- 16.8% with abciximab, 51.3 +/- 17.6% with tirofiban and 52.9 +/- 14.8% with eptifibatide (p = 0.37). Tirofiban and eptifibatide maintained their level of platelet inhibition during infusion. Flow cytometry revealed that the reduction in the monocyte-platelet interaction by abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide was not significantly different (20.0 +/- 21.9%, 23.8 +/- 18.2% and 21.0 +/- 19.8%, respectively; p = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide, at currently recommended doses, achieved similar levels of inhibition of platelet aggregation and a similar reduction in the platelet-monocyte interaction.     

Pharmacodynamics,safety, and clinical effects of a novel glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist framon during high risk coronary angioplasty

Preparation framon [F(ab')2 fragments of the anti-glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa monoclonal antibody (FRaMon)] blocks fibrinogen binding to GP IIb/IIIa and platelet aggregation. Dynamics of platelet aggregation inhibition, safety, and clinical effects of framon were studied in high-risk coronary angioplasty. Twenty seven patients underwent angioplasty with framon, 29 - with abciximab and 28 - with no GP IIb/IIIa antagonists. Framon at 0.2 mg/kg (n=16) and 0.25 mg/kg (n=11) bolus administration inhibited platelet aggregation induced by 20 mcM ADP by more than 90%, 80%, 60% and 30% in comparison with the predrug level 1, 12, 24 and 72 h after injection, respectively. Almost the same dynamics of aggregation inhibition was observed upon abciximab administration at 0.25 mg/kg bolus + 0.125 mcg/kg/min infusion for 12 h. No signs of individual intolerance and side effects including allergic reactions and bleedings were detected in patients treated with framon. Slight decrease of platelet count (15-20%) was observed on the first day after framon administration. Antibodies against framon were detected in 1 out of 22 tested patients. Free (nonbound to platelets) framon was completely removed from the circulation 12 h after injection. The number of endpoints (death, myocardial infarction and indications for repeat revascularization) within 1 year after angioplasty was approximately the same in the groups with framon and abciximab - 7 of 25 (28%) and 7 of 28 (25%), respectively, and more than 1.5 fold higher in the group without GP IIb/IIIa blockers - 12 of 27 (44,4%).     

Design and methodology of the ESPRIT trial: evaluating a novel dosing regimen of eptifibatide in percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors have shown that these potent antiplatelet agents are effective in reducing the ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary interventions. However, even though stents are now implanted in >75% of percutaneous interventional procedures, only one study, a trial of the monoclonal antibody abciximab, has formally evaluated adjunctive GP IIb/IIIa inhibition in this setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eptifibatide, a nonimmunogenic and rapidly reversible inhibitor of the platelet receptor integrin IIb/IIIa, has also undergone evaluation as an adjunct to coronary intervention. In clinical trials performed heretofore, however, it has appeared to have less relative clinical efficacy than the monoclonal antibody abciximab. Since the early seminal trials, it has been recognized that the doses of eptifibatide previously used achieved only 30% to 50% of maximal platelet GP IIb/IIIa integrin inhibition. This is considerably less than the 80% level of receptor inhibition that has been proposed to prevent coronary thrombus formation in animal models and that has been achieved in clinical trials with abciximab. CONCLUSIONS: The Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Therapy (ESPRIT) trial was designed to test the safety and efficacy of a high-dose, "180/2.0/180" double-bolus regimen of eptifibatide (a 180-microg/kg bolus followed 10 minutes later by a second 180-microg/kg bolus of eptifibatide combined with a 2.0-microg/kg per minute infusion) as an adjunct to nonacute percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation. In this report, we review the rationale, design, and methods of this clinical investigation.     

Long-term mortality benefit with abciximab in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to test: 1) if platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa) blockade with abciximab bolus plus 12-h infusion reduces mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); 2) if prevention of early myocardial infarction (MI) after PCI is a mechanism for reducing mortality; and 3) for risk factors for mortality after PCI.

BACKGROUND

Studies of PCI suggest that MI after intervention is predictive of mortality. Abciximab, a platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, has consistently reduced the incidence of MI among PCI patients in several trials. The presumed mechanism is prevention of platelet thrombus associated with vessel wall injury and downstream embolization into the microcirculation.

METHODS

In eight trials, 5,154 patients were randomized to a regimen comprising conventional therapy plus a bolus of abciximab within 1 h before PCI followed by a 12-h infusion; 4,136 controls were randomized to conventional therapy alone. Patient follow-up from six months to three years was available. Survival differences are examined using proportional hazards regression and survival curves.

RESULTS

A hazard ratio of 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.89; P = 0.003) suggests a mortality benefit with abciximab. The absolute reduction in mortality was estimated to be 0.5% through 30 days, 0.7% through six months, 0.9% through one year and 1.8% through three years. Early MI explained 18% of the observed mortality benefit at one year. Multivariate regression suggests that patients with advanced cardiovascular disease may derive the greatest mortality benefit from abciximab.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence from 9,290 randomized PCI patients shows a mortality benefit provided by abciximab bolus plus 12-h infusion.     

Bivalirudin with planned or provisional abciximab versus low-dose heparin and abciximab during percutaneous coronary revascularization: results of the Comparison of Abciximab Complications with Hirulog for Ischemic Events Trial (CACHET)

Background The direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin has previously been associated with better efficacy and lower hemorrhage risk than heparin during balloon angioplasty. This agent has not yet been tested with stenting or in combination with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists. Methods and Results In a pilot trial, 268 patients who underwent coronary intervention were randomized in 3 sequential phases to treatment with bivalirudin (with or without abciximab) or the control regimen of low-dose weight-adjusted heparin with abciximab. Patients in the bivalirudin arms received bivalirudin (1.0 mg/kg bolus, infusion of 2.5 mg/kg/h for 4 hours) plus abciximab in phase A, bivalirudin (0.5 mg/kg bolus, infusion of 1.75 mg/kg/h for the procedure duration) plus provisional (“rescue”) abciximab in phase B, or bivalirudin (0.75 mg/kg bolus, infusion of 1.75 mg/kg/h for the procedure duration) plus provisional abciximab in phase C. Abciximab was necessitated on a provisional basis in 24% of the patients in the bivalirudin arms of phases B and C. A composite clinical endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, or major bleeding by 7 days occurred in 3.3%, 5.9%, 0, and 10.6% of the patients in the bivalirudin phase A, bivalirudin phase B, bivalirudin phase C, and heparin plus planned abciximab arms, respectively (P = .018 for the pooled bivalirudin groups versus the heparin group). Conclusion Bivalirudin with planned or provisional abciximab may be at least as safe and effective as low-dose heparin plus abciximab during percutaneous coronary intervention. (Am Heart J 2002;143:847-53.)     

Quantification of abciximab-induced platelet inhibition is assay dependent: a comparative study in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Background The best method for measuring the degree of platelet inhibition with glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa antagonists during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and the optimal degree of periprocedural inhibition is uncertain. Low molecular weight heparins have been reported to cause less platelet activation than unfractionated heparin. Therefore, compared with unfractionated heparin (UHF), a low molecular weight heparin could enhance measured platelet inhibition. In this study, we compared 3 methods of measuring platelet inhibition and investigated the effects of half doses of abciximab in combination with either UFH or the low molecular weight heparin dalteparin in patients undergoing PCI with planned abciximab administration. Methods Abciximab-induced platelet inhibition was measured serially by means of 3 assays: 1) GP IIb-IIIa receptor occupancy, 2) binding of the activated GP IIb—IIIa-specific monoclonal antibody PAC1, and 3) agglutination of platelets with fibrinogen-coated beads (RPFA). Forty patients were randomly allocated to receive either UFH (70 U/kg) or dalteparin (60 IU/kg), followed by a half dose of abciximab (0.125 mg/kg) administered twice at 10-minute intervals. Assays were obtained 10 minutes after each half dose of abciximab and 8 to 10 and 24 hours after abciximab administration. Results No differences between UFH and dalteparin were observed. At each time-point measured, the mean percent platelet inhibition as determined by means of the receptor occupancy assay and PAC1 binding assay was less than the degree of inhibition determined by means of the RPFA. Conclusions The results of targeted levels of platelet inhibition cannot be extrapolated between different clinical trials of GP IIb-IIIa antagonists unless the same assay is used. Dalteparin, compared with UFH, does not enhance platelet inhibition or receptor occupancy by abciximab, as demonstrated by means of 3 separate assays. (Am Heart J 2003;145:e6.)     

Comparison of bivalirudin versus heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (the Randomized Evaluation of PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events [REPLACE]-1 trial)

To assess the efficacy of the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin relative to heparin during contemporary coronary intervention, 1,056 patients who underwent elective or urgent revascularization were randomized in a large-scale pilot study to receive heparin (70 U/kg initial bolus) or bivalirudin (0.75 mg/kg bolus, 1.75 mg/kg/hour infusion during the procedure). All patients received aspirin; pretreatment with clopidogrel was encouraged, and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockade was at the physician's discretion. Stents were placed in 85% of patients; 72% received a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, and 56% were pretreated with clopidogrel. Activated clotting times were higher among patients randomized to bivalirudin than among those given heparin before device activation (median 359 vs 293 seconds, p <0.001). The composite efficacy end point of death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization before hospital discharge or within 48 hours occurred in 5.6% and 6.9% of patients in the bivalirudin and heparin groups, respectively (p = 0.40). Major bleeding occurred in 2.1% versus 2.7% of patients randomized to bivalirudin or heparin, respectively (p = 0.52). This trial represents the largest prospective dataset of bivalirudin administered concomitantly with planned GP IIb/IIIa blockade and provides evidence of the safety and efficacy of this combined antithrombotic approach.     

Effects of Different Thrombolytic Treatment Regimen with Abciximab and Tirofiban on Platelet Aggregation and Platelet-Leukocyte Interactions: A Subgroup Analysis from the GUSTO V and FASTER Trials

Background: Due to considerably high rates of reocclusion under standard thrombolytic therapy GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been combined with thrombolytics to improve therapeutic outcomes. Potential reasons for arterial reocclusion may be increased platelet activation, interaction of platelets with other cell types such as leukocytes and inadequate drug dosing due to lack of ideal platelet monitoring. We compared combination therapy regimens consisting of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and thrombolytics with respect to platelet inhibition and platelet-leukocyte interactions. Methods and results: From the GUSTO V trial (standard rPA vs. reduced dose rPA and abciximab) and the FASTER trial (standard TNK-tPA vs. reduced dose TNK-tPA and tirofiban) 15 patients were monitored by platelet aggregometry, rapid platelet function assay (RPFA) and flow cytometry (FC). rPA alone (n = 5) caused initial increases in platelet aggregation. However, platelet aggregation was significantly (p < 0.05) and sufficiently (>80%) inhibited by abciximab/rPA (n = 5) and tirofiban/TNK-tPA (n = 5). The platelet inhibitory effect of tirofiban/TNK-tPA was more pronounced compared to abciximab/rPA with a significant difference after 2 h (p < 0.05). Tirofiban/TNK-tPA and abciximab/rPA caused decreases in platelet-leukocyte aggregates as well as in binding of specific antibodies to the platelet vitronectin receptor and P-selectin (p < 0.05, respect.). No differences among the treatment groups were seen with respect to antibody binding to MAC-1 and CD154/CD40 ligand. Conclusions: Taken together, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors overcome the platelet activating effect of thrombolytics resulting in sufficient platelet inhibition. RPFA is a suitable monitoring tool to accurately assess platelet inhibition. Within the given combination treatment regimen tirofiban appears to be more effective compared to abciximab and to exert effects beyond the inhibition of GP IIb/IIIa.     

Time course, magnitude, and consistency of platelet inhibition by abciximab, tirofiban, or eptifibatide in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Adjunctive platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces platelet-mediated adverse ischemic outcomes. Although abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban have received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for use, these agents differ in their pharmacodynamic profiles. Each of these agents has been compared in randomized trials with placebo for patients undergoing PCI, but no randomized comparative studies of these agents have been performed. We compared ex vivo platelet function by both standard light transmission aggregometry and rapid platelet function assay during and after administration of abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban in approved dose regimens on a randomized basis at the time of PCI in patients with unstable angina pectoris. A reduced intensity of platelet inhibition by light transmission aggregometry was observed for tirofiban compared with either eptifibatide or abciximab. In addition, the 30-minute bolus strategy used for tirofiban was associated with delayed onset of maximal platelet inhibition relative to the initiation of bolus infusion. Whether the trends in platelet function observed in this study will be translated into differences in clinical outcomes awaits definition by larger scale randomized clinical trials comparing these platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.     

Variability in extent of platelet function inhibition after administration of optimal dose of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers in patients undergoing a high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

The Ultegra Rapid Platelet Function Assay was used to measure the inhibition of platelet aggregation at baseline and 10 minutes and 8 hours after starting therapy in 114 patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the planned use of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. The abciximab-treated patients received a 0.25 mg/kg bolus, followed by a 0.125 microg/kg/min infusion for 12 hours; the eptifibatide-treated patients received 2 boluses of 180 microg/kg administered 10 minutes apart, followed by a 2 microg/kg/min infusion for 24 hours; the tirofiban-treated patients received a 25 microg/kg bolus, followed by a 0.15 microg/kg/min infusion for 18 hours. Ten minutes after starting therapy, the mean level of platelet inhibition was 86 +/- 9% for abciximab, 92 +/- 6% for eptifibatide, and 95 +/- 5% for tirofiban (p <0.001); > or =95% platelet inhibition was achieved in 29% of the patients treated with abciximab, 44% of those receiving eptifibatide, and 68% of the those receiving tirofiban (p = 0.02). In conclusion, at the evaluated doses, tirofiban seemed to be the most effective drug in achieving "optimal" platelet inhibition very early after percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Synthetic inhibitors of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in clinical development

Activation of the platelet glycoprotein (GP IIb/IIIa) receptor on the platelet surface is the final pathway of platelet aggregation, regardless of the initiating stimulus. Inhibitors of GP IIb/IIIa receptors include monoclonal antibodies (abciximab) against this receptor and peptidic and nonpeptidic synthetic specific receptor blockers. Abciximab exchanges between and binds to platelets for as long as 2 weeks, whereas synthetic GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors inhibit ex vivo platelet aggregation for only a few hours after the end of infusion, but some have the advantage of also being orally active. In the secondary prevention of atherothrombosis, large-scale trials were successfully conducted with aspirin, dipyridamole, ticlopidine, and clopidogrel. In the first large-scale trials with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, abciximab was investigated. In aggregate, synthetic GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, combined with aspirin and heparin, were shown to reduce ischemic events in patients with high- and low-risk coronary intervention, stents, unstable angina, and non-Q-wave infarction. With short-term use of synthetic GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, there is no suppression of clinical evident restenosis 6 months after the end of treatment. With the doses currently used, bleeding occurs more often with the synthetic GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (used for 3 days) than with abciximab (used for 12 hours), but there are no direct comparisons between these drugs.     

The Ultegra rapid platelet-function assay: comparison to standard platelet function assays in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with abciximab therapy

Background Despite the proven benefit of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention, significant interpatient variability exists in antiplatelet response. Furthermore, a diminished degree of platelet inhibition is an independent predictor of adverse cardiac events, highlighting the need for accurate and precise monitoring of platelet function. Methods Patients (n = 192) who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention at 4 centers were enrolled. The following 3 time points were studied: 1, baseline, before abciximab bolus administration; 2, during, within 1 hour of abciximab bolus administration; and 3, post, 24 hours after abciximab bolus administration or at the time of patient discharge, whichever occurred first. The following 3 assays were compared at all time points: Ultegra rapid platelet-function assay (Ultegra RPFA), conventional turbidometric platelet aggregometry, and receptor binding assay with [¹²⁵I]-abciximab. Variability in Ultegra RPFA measurements between operators was determined with performance of the assays at the point of care and in the laboratory. A sub-study of 22 patients at 1 center was performed in which the laboratory scientist performed all 3 assays in duplicate at each time point. Results Comparison with the receptor binding assay and conventional platelet aggregometry in 120 patients showed that the Ultegra RPFA correlated with aggregometry (r = 0.89) and with the receptor binding assay (r = 0.89). There was good agreement (r = 0.80) between values obtained by intended users and those obtained by laboratory scientists. Furthermore, Ultegra RPFA values had equivalent precision to the standard assays. Conclusion The Ultegra RPFA has equivalent accuracy and precision when compared with the 2 reference assays studied. Ultegra RPFA measurements are not operator-dependent and are not influenced by concomitant medications, hematologic parameters, or demographics. (Am Heart J 2002;143:602-11.)     

Use of Abciximab in threatening vascular occlusion after PTCA

The administration of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists has been shown to be effective in reducing myocardial infarction and cardial death when given before PTCA. This prospective study was performed to determine the efficacy of abciximab in a bail-out situation to manage threatened or acute vessel closure. METHODS: Acute or threatened vessel closure was observed in 104 (5.5%) out of 1903 consecutive patients treated with PTCA in our institution. Of the 104 patients 46 (44%) were treated for unstable angina (CCS IV). Abciximab was administered in bail-out situations in a dosage of 0.25 mg/kg given as a bolus, which was followed by an intravenous infusion of 10 micrograms/min over 12 hours. Repeat PTCA was performed shortly after the administration of the abciximab bolus. After the procedure, the sheath was left in place and control angiography was carried out 24 h later. RESULTS: In 100 of the 104 patients TIMI flow III could be restored by abciximab therapy and RePTCA. In 4 patients an additional stent implantation was necessary due to persistent flow limitation. One day post PTCA, early follow-up angiography demonstrated patency of all vessels except two. In-hospital events occurred in 4 patients. Three of these patients underwent emergency CABG due to subacute vessel closure a few hours after PTCA and died during or directly after surgery. Follow-up after one year included clinical status and control angiography of the target vessel. During long-term follow-up, MACE occurred in 15 patients (2 MI, 8 CABG and 5 RePTCA). CONCLUSION: The results of this prospective trial demonstrate the efficacy of abciximab therapy in bail-out situations occurring during or early after PTCA. The use of abciximab in bail-out situations appears clinically beneficial. Further studies have to compare the efficacy of this approach with prophylactic abciximab treatment.     

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade with coronary stent placement.

GP IIb/IIIa blockade for stenting offers almost complete inhibition of platelet aggregation and can bridge the delayed onset of action of ticlopidine. In the EPISTENT trial, GP IIb/IIIa blockade with abciximab reduced the 30-day cardiac event rate after stenting by more than 50% compared to placebo. Economic constraints may demand to restrict the use of GP IIb/IIIa blockade to subgroups that benefit most. Bail-out stenting constitutes one of these subgroups. Another group are patients with acute myocardial infarction. Moreover, the exquisitely high risk of residual dissection after stenting suggests to always employ GP IIb/IIIa blockade in this instance.     

Safety and efficacy of low-dose intravenous enoxaparin and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy during PCI

The use of intravenous enoxaparin, a glyco-protein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor, during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to be safe and to possibly reduce in-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiac events(MACE). NICE-4, a recent PCI observational study, evaluated a reduced dose of intravenous (IV) enoxaparin (0.75 mg/kg) with abciximab. However, prior PCI studies evaluating IV enoxaparin have not used percutaneous closure devices. The purpose of this study was to observe the safety and efficacy of a lower dose of IV enoxaparin (0.5 mg/kg) in conjunction with any GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. The Angio-Seal femoral closure device was also employed as part of the treatment strategy. We administered 0.5 mg/kg IV enoxaparin and a GP IIIb/IIIa inhibitor to 75 eligible PCI patients. None received anticoagulation 24 hours prior to PCI; all received pre-procedural aspirin, post-procedural deployment of the Angio-Seal and clopidogrel therapy, and were discharged home within 36 hours. TIMI minor bleeding was 1.3%; there were no TIMI major bleeding events or major adverse cardiac events during in-hospital stay or at 30-day follow-up. Our small observational study shows that IV enoxaparin is safe and efficacious during PCI when given at a dose 33% lower than previously reported in conjunction with any GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor and Angio-Seal. However, large, randomized PCI trials are needed to confirm the clinical efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of lower doses of enoxaparin with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors and vascular closure devices.     

Blockade of the human platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor by a murine monoclonal antibody Fab fragment (7E3): Potent dose-dependent inhibition of platelet function

Summary The platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor can bind fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor, and other adhesive ligands; this binding is the final common pathway mediating platelet aggregation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and platelet inhibitory characteristics of the Fab fragment of the murine monoclonal anti-GPIIb/IIIa 7E3 antibody (m7E3 Fab) when administered intravenously as a single bolus dose, as a single and repeat bolus dose, and as a single bolus dose followed by continuous infusions of varying duration. Various dosage regimens of m7E3 Fab were studied in 74 patients with stable angina. Dosage regimens included single doses of m7E3 Fab from 0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg, a single dose of 0.20–0.30 mg/kg, and a repeat dose of 0.05 mg/kg, or a loading dose followed by a continuous infusion of m7E3 Fab for up to 36 hours. To assess the effect of m7E3 Fab on platelet function, quantitative blockade of GPIIb/IIIa receptors, inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation, and template bleeding time were measured in all patients. Dose-dependent inhibition of platelet function was evident in response to escalating bolus doses of m7E3 Fab, with maximum inhibition observed at 0.25–0.30 mg/kg body weight; at the 0.30 mg/kg dose, mean (±SE) GPIIb/IIIa receptor blockade was 81±3%, ex vivo platelet aggregation in response to 20 µM ADP was 14±6% of baseline, and the median bleeding time was >20 minutes. Although platelet function gradually recovered following a single bolus injection, platelet inhibition could be sustained by continuous, low-dose infusion of the antibody. Platelet inhibition occurred within minutes, but m7E3 Fab that did not bind to platelets cleared rapidly from circulation. Sixteen percent of the m7E3 Fab-injected subjects exhibited low titer, human anti-murine antibody responses. No significant bleeding or allergic reactions were observed in any patients. One of the 74 patients developed transient thrombocytopenia soon after receiving m7E3 Fab. These studies establish that m7E3 Fab can be administered safely at doses that cause profound inhibition of platelet function.     

A comparative study of light transmission aggregometry and automated bedside platelet function assays in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and receiving abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban.

Platelet inhibition is central to the efficacy of glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa antagonist therapy, but is not routinely measured during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data directly comparing the antiplatelet effects of these agents are also limited. Therefore, we compared ex vivo platelet function by standard light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and two automated bedside platelet function assays in 36 patients undergoing PCI with GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors. At baseline and 10 min following clinically recommended bolus and infusion of abciximab (0.25 mg/kg, 0.125 microg/kg/min), eptifibatide (180 microg/kg, 2 microg/kg/min), or tirofiban (10 microg/kg, 0.1 microg/kg/min), we measured 20 microM ADP- and 1.9 mg/mL collagen-induced platelet aggregation using LTA. Platelet function was also assessed using the bedside Accumetrics Ultegra-Rapid Platelet Function Assay (RPFA) and the Xylum Clot Signature Analyzer (CSA). The degree of platelet inhibition, as assessed by LTA, varied significantly between the clinically recommended doses of these GP IIb-IIIa antagonists. RPFA measurements agreed closely with LTA for abciximab, but tended to overestimate the degree of platelet inhibition for small molecules. CSA demonstrated profoundly inhibited shear-induced platelet function, but lacked sensitivity to discriminate between agents. These findings may have implications for the results of trials comparing the efficacy of these agents in patients undergoing PCI.     

Effect of abciximab versus tirofiban on activated clotting time during percutaneous intervention and its relation to clinical outcomes--observations from the TARGET trial

Previous evidence suggests that the monoclonal antibody abciximab may have a more potent anticoagulant effect than small-molecule glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors. We prospectively reviewed collected heparin dose, activated clotting time (ACT), and corresponding clinical outcome data from The Do Tirofiban and ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcome Trial (TARGET), a direct comparison of tirofiban versus abciximab in patients who underwent percutaneous intervention. Of the 4,809 patients enrolled in the trial, 3,739 patients (78%) had an ACT measured after the administration of GP IIb/IIIa and heparin (peak procedural ACT); this formed the population for the present study. Mean total heparin dose was 75 +/- 32 and 76 +/- 31 U/kg in the tirofiban and abciximab groups, respectively. The resultant mean peak ACTs were 296 +/- 91 and 299 +/- 89 seconds (p = 0.09). In a subset of patients with both baseline ACT (before any heparin or GP IIb/IIIa therapy) and peak procedural ACT measurements, the difference in ACT between these time points was 80 +/- 97 vs 82 +/- 101 seconds (p = 0.44) for the tirofiban and abciximab groups, respectively. After adjusting for patients' weight, weight-adjusted heparin dose, and method of ACT measurement in a multiple linear regression analysis, the type of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor was not predictive of the peak ACT (p = 0.24). When stratified by ACT quartile, no statistically significant difference in bleeding or ischemic end points between the tirofiban and abciximab cohorts was observed. In this large contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention trial, there was no observed difference in the anticoagulant effect of tirofiban and abciximab, as measured by the ACT, or in the incidence of bleeding or ischemic complications in each ACT quartile.