Human pancreas procurement for pancreas and islet transplantation

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is a disease characterized by a deficiency of insulin secretion by beta islet cells. Integral pancreatic transplantation and islet cell transplantation represent two possibilities of replacing the beta islet cells. The aim of this paper is to analyze the main aspects of selection criteria of the pancreas donor and surgical methods of preservation for integral pancreas or islet cell transplantation. There are described the pancreas procurements realized by the Center of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation team from Fundeni Clinical Institute between December 2005-December 2006 and correlation between the donor's and pancreas features and the quality of islet cell isolation. The selection of pancreas donor and the accomplishment of pancreas procurement represent important factors in the post-transplantation course of the graft. The data from pancreas/islet cell transplantation centers suggest that the factors that influence positively the course of graft are: the donor's age, body mass index, cold ischemia time.     

Technique of pancreatic procurement for pancreatic islet isolation

AIM OF THE STUDY: The allograft of pancreatic islets represents a potential alternative to insulin therapy in patients suffering from the most severe forms of Type 1 diabetes. Here we report our experience of pancreatic procurement for isolation and islet allograft. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pancreata were procured in brain-dead donors. The islets were isolated using techniques developed and validated in pigs and men. Injection of a given preparation was decided after quantitative and qualitative controls. Islets were transplanted in Type 1 diabetic patients already grafted with a kidney or suffering from severe and/or unstable diabetes, after percutaneous or surgical settlement of an intra-portal catheter. Patients received an "Edmonton-like" immunosuppressive protocol. Grafts were repeated once or twice until a total quantity of 10,000 transplanted islet-equivalents was obtained. RESULTS: Twenty-nine pancreata were procured and 14 preparations were grafted to 7 patients. Eleven graftings were done percutaneously and three were surgical. The initial function of the 14 transplants was confirmed by secretion of C-peptide and decrease of insulin doses. Insulin therapy was completely interrupted in the 5 patients having received at least two grafts. CONCLUSION: These preliminary clinical results confirmed that the isolation technique of human islets and the technique of pancreas procurement are mastered by our team. If the results of this assay (assessment one year after graft) confirm our hopes, we will be able to offer islet allografts to an increasing number of patients with severe Type 1 diabetes.     

Microbial surveillance during human pancreatic islet isolation

OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to investigate the microbiological safety of islet isolation and transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2002, prospective microbiological screening was performed on all pancreata procured for islet transplantation. Pancreas transport media and postpurification preparations were screened for microbiological contamination. Prior to isolation, pancreata were washed with either Hanks solution (group I, n = 170) or decontaminated with antiseptic and antimicrobial drugs (group II, n = 45). RESULTS: Microbiological contamination of the pancreas preservation media was shown in 62%. Analysis of the contaminants showed 74% gram-positive, 21% gram-negative organisms, and 5% fungi. The donor condition or procurement center did not influence the contamination rate. Longer pancreas transport duration was significantly associated with bacterial contamination (P <.05). In group I, 16 (9.4%) of 170 islet preparations presented microbial contamination at the end of the isolation procedures. Gram-positive organisms were present in 10 (6%), gram-negative organisms in 4 (2.4%), and fungi in 2 (1.2%) preparations. Four islet preparations (2.4%) from pancreata with noninfected transport medium were positive on postpurification cultures, all with gram-positive organisms. In group II, only 2 of 45 islet preparations (4.4%) presented microbial contamination at the end of the isolation process. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of microbial contamination during pancreas procurement and transport is high. Significant contaminants present when beginning islet isolation become undetectable by the conclusion of isolation. Diminishing the bio-burden by pancreas decontamination reduces the risk of contamination of the final islet preparation.     

Microbial surveillance during human pancreatic islet isolation

The aim of the study was to investigate microbiological contamination rate during human pancreatic islet isolation. Between 1996 and 2002, pancreas preservation media and post-purification islet preparations were screened for microbiological contamination. After arrival in the laboratory, pancreata were washed prior to enzyme perfusion with either Hank's balanced salt solution (Group I, n = 170, 1996 to 2001) or decontaminated with polyvidonum-iodine, cefazoline, and amphotericine B (Group II, n = 45, 2001 to 2002). Microbiological contamination of preservation media was observed in 56% and 84% for Groups I and II, respectively. Analysis of contaminants revealed 74% Gram-positive, 21% Gram-negative bacteria and 5% fungi. Duration of transport had an influence on the rate of contamination (P < 0.05). After islet isolation, Group I presented microbial contamination of 16 islet preparations (9.4%) [i.e. Gram-positive bacteria (n = 10), Gram-negative bacteria (n = 4), and fungi (n = 2)]. In Group II, only 2 islet preparations (4.4%) presented microbial contamination. Microbial contamination during pancreas procurement occurs frequently. Most microorganisms are eliminated during islet isolation, and de novo contaminations during islet isolation are rare. Pancreas decontamination reduces the risk of infection of the final islet preparation.     

Analysis on donor and isolation-related factors of successful isolation of human islet of Langerhans from human cadaveric donors

We analyzed the preexisting donor factors and isolation variables that affected isolation of human islets of Langerhans. Sixty-nine pancreata from cadaveric donors were analyzed for donor factors of age, gender, body mass index, cause of death as well as graft factors of cold ischemia time, pancreas status, distensibility during intraductal collagenase distension and time of collagenase expansion and digestion. Islet isolations that recovered >100,000 IEQ (n = 53) were compared to those generating less than 100,000 IEQ (n = 16) to analyze the factors affecting islet yield during donor harvest and isolation procedures. The mean islet recovery was 216.0 x 10(3) (IEQ) or 2840 (IEQ) per gram of pancreas. Mean purity was 54%. The success rate of islet isolation was 76%. Mean age was 31 years, and mean cold ischemia time was 6.9 hours. In univariate analysis, the status of the pancreas was the only significant factor for successful isolation, and gender, time of collagenase expansion and digestion were marginal factors. In stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis of donor and isolation-related factors, donor gender, pancreas status and digestion time were significant factors. During the same period we performed three cases of clinical islet allotransplantation and one autotransplantation. This study confirmed that the same donor factors and variables in the isolation process can affect the ability to obtain successful human islet isolation. Enough experience and pertinent review of donor and isolation factors can make islet isolation consistent, supporting clinical islet transplantation without unnecessary cost.     

Detection of microbial contamination during human islet isolation

Current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) islet processing facilities provide an ultraclean environment for the safe production of clinical grade islets for transplantation into immunosuppressed diabetic recipients. The objective of this study was to monitor the rate of microbial contamination in islet products after implementation of good manufacturing practice conditions. Fluid samples for microbial contamination were collected at the following steps: from the pancreas transport solution upon arrival of the organ (n=157), after surface decontamination of the pancreas with antiseptic agents (n=89), from islet supernatant at the end of the isolation (n=104), and from islet supernatant as a final transplantable product after culture (n=53). Bacterial, fungal, and mycoplasma cultures were conducted for 2, 2, and 3 weeks, respectively. Microbial contamination was detected in 31% of transport solution. The contamination was not associated with the presence of the duodenum during the preservation, cold ischemia time, or procurement team (local vs. distant). Surface decontamination of the pancreas resulted in clearance of 92% of the microbial contamination. Six preparations at the end of the isolation revealed microbial growth. All were de novo contamination during the processing. Fifty-three preparations that met our release criteria in terms of product sterility were transplanted into type 1 diabetic patients. In two instances, positive culture of the islet preparation was reported after transplantation had occurred. No patient showed any clinical findings suggestive of infection or any radiological abnormalities suggestive of abscess; a single dose of antibiotic coverage was given routinely to recipients prior to islet infusion. Although transport solution carries a high risk of microbial contamination, most contaminants become undetectable during islet processing. Microbial contamination in final products is rare, but de novo contamination still occurs during processing even under cGMP conditions.     

Effect of human islet rescue gradient purification on islet yield and fractional Beta cell viability

It is difficult to consistently obtain sufficient postpurification islet numbers from younger donors because of the higher proportion of trapped islets after pancreas digestion. Continuous gradient purification (CGP), which is currently used in several islet processing centers, sometimes is not efficient in the purification of trapped islets. Rescue gradient purification (RGP) could improve postpurification islet yields, resulting in an increased number of islet cell products that could be transplanted. Sixty-eight human islet isolations, in which CGP was followed by RGP were analyzed. The quality of islets from CGP and RGP was assessed by beta-cell fractional viability (betaFV) and ADP/ATP ratio. Donor age negatively correlated with the proportion of the islets rescued by RGP (R = -0.52; P < .01) and to the percentage of trapped islets (R = -0.46; P < .01). Age-related differences were observed in pancreas weight, digestion time, and islet yields from CGP, respectively. Importantly, islets from RGP had an 11% higher betaFV compared with islets from CGP. ADP/ATP ratio was also lower in RGP islets versus CGP islets. RGP improved the efficiency of islet purification from younger pancreata and did not affect islet cell viability, which was actually higher in RGP fractions, indicating that rescued trapped islets from the pellet and lower purity layers are not damaged by the extra purification step and may actually be more viable. RGP could be used to rescue high-quality islets from less than 30% pure islet fractions, which are often discarded in the clinical setting.     

Effect of JNK inhibitor during islet isolation and transplantation

Although islet transplantation has been remarkably improved by the Edmonton protocol, the insulin independence rate after islet transplantation from one donor pancreas has remained low. The c-Jun NH2-terminal kinases (JNKs) are classic stress-activated protein kinases; many cellular stresses have been shown to stimulate JNK activation. JNK in the pancreas is activated during brain death, pancreas procurement, and organ preservation, and its activity is progressively increased during the isolation procedure. Moreover, JNK activity in the transplanted liver after islet transplantation increases markedly within 24 hours. In this study, we show the effect of a JNK inhibitor during islet isolation and transplantation. Use of the JNK inhibitor in pancreas preservation, islet culture, and/or islet transplantation prevents islet cell apoptosis and improves islet graft function. These findings suggest that inhibition of JNK could prevent the impairment of islet cells and improve outcomes after pancreatic islet transplantation.     

Influence of pancreas preservation on human islet isolation outcomes: impact of the two-layer method

BACKGROUND: Human pancreas preservation for islet transplantation holds additional challenges and considerations compared with whole pancreas transplantation. The purpose of this study was to clarify the limitations of the University of Wisconsin (UW) solution and the potentials of the two-layer method (TLM) for pancreas preservation before human islet isolation. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated human islet isolation records between January 2001 and February 2003. One hundred forty-two human pancreata were procured from cadaveric donors and preserved by means of the UW solution (n=112) or TLM (n=30). Human islet isolations were performed using a standard protocol and assessed by islet recovery and in vitro function of islets. RESULTS: Eight to ten hours of cold ischemia in the UW solution is a critical point for successful islet isolations. It is difficult to recover a sufficient number of viable islets for transplantation from human pancreata with more than 10 hours of cold storage in the UW solution. The overall islet recovery in the TLM group was significantly higher than in the UW group. With 10 to 16 hours of cold storage, the success rates of islet isolations remained at 62% in the TLM group but decreased to 22% in the UW group. Transplanted islets in the TLM group worked well in the recipients. CONCLUSIONS: There are time limitations for using the UW solution for pancreas preservation before human islet isolation. The TLM is a potential method to prolong the optimal cold storage time for successful islet isolations.     

Comparison of modified Celsior solution and M-kyoto solution for pancreas preservation in human islet isolation

Since the successful demonstration of the Edmonton protocol, islet transplantation has advanced significantly on several fronts, including improved pancreas preservation systems. In this study, we evaluated two different types of organ preservation solutions for human islet isolation. Modified Celsior (Celsior solution with hydroxyethyl starch and nafamostat mesilate; HNC) solution and modified Kyoto (MK) solution were compared for pancreas preservation prior to islet isolation. Islet yield after purification was significantly higher in the MK group than in the HNC group (MK = 6186 ± 985 IE/g; HNC = 3091 ± 344 IE/g). The HNC group had a longer phase I period (digestion time), a higher volume of undigested tissue, and a higher percentage of embedded islets, suggesting that the solution may inhibit collagenase. However, there was no significant difference in ATP content in the pancreata or in the attainability of posttransplant normoglycemia in diabetic nude mice between the two groups, suggesting that the quality of islets was similar among the two groups. In conclusion, MK solution is better for pancreas preservation before islet isolation than HNC solution due to the higher percentage of islets that can be isolated from the donor pancreas. MK solution should be the solution of choice among the commercially available solutions for pancreatic islet isolation leading to transplantation.     

Impact of adverse pancreatic injury at surgical procurement upon islet isolation outcome

The consequence of a pancreas injury during the procurement for islet isolation purpose is unknown. The goal of this work was to assess the injuries of the pancreata procured for islet isolation, and to determine their effect on the islet yield. Between January 2007 and October 2013, we prospectively documented every injury of the pancreata processed in our centre for islet isolation. Injuries involving the main duct were classified as major, the others as minor. Donors’ characteristics and islet yields were compared between the groups of injuries. A pancreas injury was identified in 42 of 452 pancreata received for islet isolation (9.3%). In 15 cases, the injury was major (3.3% of all pancreata). Although a minor injury did not affect the islet yield, a major injury was significantly associated with unfavourable outcomes (postpurification mean islet equivalent of 364 ± 181, 405 ± 190 and 230 ± 115 × 10³ for absence of injury, minor injury and major injury, respectively). A major injury was significantly more prevalent in lean and short donors. We recommend assessing the quality of the pancreas in the islet isolation centre before starting the isolation procedure. Each centre should determine its own policy based on its financial resources and on the wait list.     

Donor and isolation variables predicting human islet isolation success

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in the fields of islet transplantation and in vitro islet cell expansion place a renewed emphasis on the optimization of islet isolation from cadaveric human donor organs. We retrospectively analyzed 171 islet isolations to identify variables that predict islet yield and isolation success. METHODS: Cadaveric human donor pancreata were procured and processed according to established protocols. Donor-, procurement-, and isolation-related variables were analyzed for correlation with islet yield and isolation success (> or =250,000 islet equivalents). RESULTS: Univariate analysis suggested correlations between islet yield and donor age (P<0.005), body surface area (P<0.005), duration of enzymatic digestion (P<0.001), and pancreatic beta-cell volume (P<0.05). Donor sex (P<0.01), procurement team (P<0.05), and peridigestion serine protease inhibition (P<0.05) affected islet yield, whereas enzyme lot (P<0.01) and pancreatic fatty infiltration (P<0.05) influenced isolation success. By logistic regression, donor sex and age, and duration of enzymatic digestion could predict a successful isolation with 72% accuracy. The use of Liberase CI improved islet yield (P<0.05) in young donors (< or =25 years). CONCLUSIONS: While donor-related variables are useful in predicting islet yield, these are likely surrogates for pancreatic beta-cell volume. Enzyme lot, and the associated duration of enzymatic digestion (P<0.05), appears to be key determinants of isolation success.