Tip of the iceberg?

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients have risk factors for acquisition of antibiotic-resistant organisms such as MRSA. In a recent study, we have shown a rising prevalence of MRSA infection among hospitalized IBD patients. This population is at increased risk of infection and its associated mortality. These findings underscore the need for infection control measures in the hospital setting.     

Tip of the iceberg?: The emergence of antibiotic-resistant organisms in the IBD population

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients have risk factors for acquisition of antibiotic-resistant organisms such as MRSA. In a recent study, we have shown a rising prevalence of MRSA infection among hospitalized IBD patients. This population is at increased risk of infection and its associated mortality. These findings underscore the need for infection control measures in the hospital setting.     

A randomized controlled trial of tea tree oil (5%) body wash versus standard body wash to prevent colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in critically ill adults: research protocol

Background  

Over the past ten years MRSA has become endemic in hospitals and is associated with increased healthcare costs. Critically ill patients are most at risk, in part because of the number of invasive therapies that they require in the intensive care unit (ICU). Washing with 5% tea tree oil (TTO) has been shown to be effective in removing MRSA on the skin. However, to date, no trials have evaluated the potential of TTO body wash to prevent MRSA colonization or infection. In addition, detecting MRSA by usual culture methods is slow. A faster method using a PCR assay has been developed in the laboratory, but requires evaluation in a large number of patients.     

The emergence of infections with community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Recently there have been reports indicating an increased incidence of MRSA infections, afflicting individuals with no apparent risk factors for hospital acquisition. Patients with community-associated (CA) MRSA are significantly younger and had different distributions of clinical infections compared with HA-MRSA patients. CA-MRSA infections have mostly been associated with staphylococcal strains bearing the SCCmec type IV element and PVL genes. These strains are more frequently susceptible to a variety of non-beta-lactam antibiotics. Clinicians must be aware of the wide and, in some cases, unique spectrum of disease caused by CA-MRSA. Continued emergence of MRSA in the community is a public-health problem that warrants increased vigilance in the diagnosis and management of suspected and confirmed staphylococcal infections.     

A multistrain cluster of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus based in a native community

Since 1986 the authors' hospital has experienced increased numbers of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates linked to residents of a native Indian community infected or colonized on admission. A survey of 422 consecutive persons from that community admitted to hospital over a three year period identified 21 (4.9%) carrying MRSA. In a case control study of 34 carriers compared to noncarriers from the community, only prior hospitalization within the past 12 months was identified as being significantly associated with the carrier state, but a specific hospital associated with this risk was not identified. A study of subsets of MRSA isolates in these patients revealed multiple strains present, identified by antibiograms, phage typing profiles and plasmid analysis. Community-based clusters of MRSA have only rarely been previously identified.     

Bedeutung des Methicillin-resistenten S. aureus (MRSA) in der Geriatrie – Epidemiologie, Therapie und Management

Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) has become an important cause of severe infection in hospitalized patients all over the world. In Germany a significant increase of nosocomial infections due to MRSA has occurred during the last 10 years. Especially elderly patients with chronic illnesses are at increased risk of becoming colonized or infected with MRSA. This report focuses on epidemiology and therapy of MRSA, and on the recommendations concerning management and prevention of spread of MRSA in hospitals and nursing homes.     

Poor Functional Status Is an Independent Predictor of Surgical Site Infections Due to Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Older Adults

BACKGROUND: Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become a common surgical site infection (SSI) pathogen, particularly in older adults. Risk factors for MRSA SSI in elderly patients have not been described. METHODS: A nested case–control study was conducted. Patients were enrolled from seven study hospitals (one medical center and six community hospitals) between January 1, 1998, and April 1, 2003. Risk factors for MRSA SSI were identified by comparing cases with two reference groups: uninfected surgical patients and patients with SSI due to methicillin‐susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). Two separate multivariate models were created using logistic regression and then compared and contrasted. RESULTS: Eighty‐six patients with MRSA and 64 with MSSA SSI were identified. One hundred sixty‐seven uninfected surgical patients were selected. In multivariate analysis using uninfected surgical patients as controls, requiring assistance in three or more activities of daily living (ADLs) was an independent risk factor for MRSA SSI (odds ratio (OR)=2.73, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.16–6.46). Using patients with MSSA SSIs as a reference group, requiring assistance in three or more ADLs was also a significant predictor for MRSA SSI (OR=3.78, 95% CI=1.43–9.98) in multivariate analysis. Other independent predictors included Charlson score, wound class, and surgical duration. Lack of independence in ADLs was an independent risk factor for MRSA SSI in elderly patients in both models. CONCLUSION: Poor functional status (requiring assistance in ≥3 ADLs) was specifically associated with MRSA SSI. Functional status is an objective, readily available variable that can be used to stratify patients at risk for MRSA SSI.     

Prevalence and significance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in patients with cystic fibrosis

Recent reports indicate that methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) may be emerging as a significant pediatric nosocomial pathogen. Children with cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary disease are subject to many of the risk factors for MRSA colonization and/or infection. We retrospectively investigated the prevalence and significance of MRSA from sputum and throat cultures in 452 patients with CF followed during 1986. No MRSA had been isolated during 1984 or 1985. Although S. aureus was isolated from 212 patients (47%) in 1986, only 14 (3%) showed MRSA. The MRSA strains had 11 different antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. Neither age, clinical condition, nor recent prior hospitalization correlated with MRSA acquisition. Acquisition did not appear to directly affect the course of the pulmonary disease in these patients even though no patient received any treatment for their MRSA. The prevalence of MRSA is low, although patients with CF are subject to many risk factors. MRSA appears to be mainly community-acquired and to represent colonization rather than infection. However, the potential for nosocomial MRSA infection is present, and vigilance is required in monitoring any changes in frequency of isolation or infection with these organisms.     

Growth in cecal mucus facilitates colonization of the mouse intestinal tract by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Intestinal colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is common in some groups of hospitalized patients and has been associated with an increased risk of staphylococcal infection. We tested the hypothesis that growth of MRSA in the colonic mucus layer is required for establishment of intestinal colonization. Mice treated with oral streptomycin before oral administration of MRSA developed persistent intestinal colonization, and the cecal mucus layer contained high concentrations of MRSA. MRSA strains grew rapidly when inoculated into cecal mucus in vitro but were unable to replicate under anaerobic conditions in cecal contents of saline- or streptomycin-treated mice. Oral vancomycin treatment reduced the density of 1 MRSA strain in stool but had no effect on a second strain. These results suggest that the cecal mucus layer provides an important niche that facilitates intestinal colonization by MRSA. Oral nonabsorbed antibiotics may be ineffective in eradicating some MRSA strains from the intestinal tract.     

Risk of acquiring antibiotic-resistant bacteria from prior room occupants

BACKGROUND: Environmental contamination with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) occurs during the care of patients harboring these organisms and may increase the risk of transmission to subsequent room occupants. METHODS: Twenty-month retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to 8 intensive care units performing routine admission and weekly screening for MRSA and VRE. We assessed the relative odds of acquisition among patients admitted to rooms in which the most recent occupants were MRSA positive or VRE positive, compared with patients admitted to other rooms. RESULTS: Of 11 528 intensive care unit room stays, 10 151 occupants were eligible to acquire MRSA, and 10 349 were eligible to acquire VRE. Among patients whose prior room occupant was MRSA positive, 3.9% acquired MRSA, compared with 2.9% of patients whose prior room occupant was MRSA negative (adjusted odds ratio, 1.4; P = .04). VRE, Among patients whose prior room occupant was VRE positive, these values were 4.5% and 2.8% respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 1.4; P = .02). These excess risks accounted for 5.1% of all incident MRSA cases and 6.8% of all incident VRE cases, with a population attributable risk among exposed patients of less than 2% for either organism. Acquisition was significantly associated with longer post-intensive care unit length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Admission to a room previously occupied by an MRSA-positive patient or a VRE-positive patient significantly increased the odds of acquisition for MRSA and VRE. However, this route of transmission was a minor contributor to overall transmission. The effect of current cleaning practices in reducing the risk to the observed levels and the potential for further reduction are unknown.     

Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospitalized adults and children without known risk factors.

Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are not commonly recognized in healthy patients without predisposing risk. We performed a retrospective study of patients hospitalized with community-acquired MRSA infections from 1992 to 1996 in Honolulu to determine if community-acquired MRSA infections occurred in patients without known risk. Patients hospitalized within the previous 6 months or transferred from other hospitals or nursing homes were excluded. Epidemiological and clinical data were obtained from an inpatient chart review. Ten (71%) of 14 patients with community-acquired MRSA infection had no discernible characteristics of MRSA infections. Thirteen (93%) patients had skin or soft-tissue infections and one patient had MRSA pneumonia. Isolates from patients with MRSA infection were more likely to be susceptible to ciprofloxacin (P = .05), clindamycin (P = .03), and erythromycin (P = .01) than were those from MRSA-colonized patients. In our population, the majority of community-acquired MRSA infections occurred in previously healthy individuals without characteristics suggestive of MRSA transmission.     

Predicting methicillin resistance and the effect of inadequate empiric therapy on survival in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

BACKGROUND: The restriction of vancomycin hydrochloride use is recommended as a measure to decrease the emergence of vancomycin resistance in gram-positive organisms; however, vancomycin also is the treatment of choice for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. If vancomycin use is restricted to patients with documented infections due to methicillin-resistant organisms, then patients with MRSA infections may not initially receive vancomycin. This study was performed to determine factors that predict MRSA bacteremia and if ineffective empiric antibiotic therapy increased the risk of death in patients with S aureus bacteremia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients with clinically significant S aureus bacteremia (132 episodes in 128 patients) diagnosed between October 1, 1995, and January 1, 1998, at an urban acute care Veterans Affairs medical center (approximately 200 acute care beds) in Baltimore, Md. During the study period, vancomycin was a restricted antibiotic. Empiric use had to be approved by an attending physician specializing in infectious diseases. RESULTS: Compared with patients who had methicillin-sensitive S aureus bacteremia, patients with MRSA bacteremia were significantly older (70 vs 58 years; P<.01), more likely to have a history of MRSA (47% vs 6%; P<.01) and a nosocomial infection (76% vs 50%; P<.01), and less likely to use injection drugs (8% vs 32%; P<.01). In addition, compared with patients who had methicillin-sensitive S aureus bacteremia, patients with MRSA bacteremia were significantly less likely (45% vs 98%; P<.01) to receive effective antibiotic therapy during the first 48 hours of hospitalization. However, the risk of death due to ineffective empiric therapy was less than 1 (relative risk, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-1.88) and did not change significantly when adjusted for age, occurrence of sepsis, or nosocomial infection. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the safety of the restriction of vancomycin use in patients with clinically significant S aureus bacteremia. However, patients with a history of MRSA are more likely to have future MRSA infections and should receive empiric therapy using vancomycin for possible S aureus infections, particularly for nosocomial infections.     

Prevalence and prediction of previously unknown MRSA carriage on admission to a geriatric hospital

OBJECTIVES: to determine the prevalence and characteristics of previously unknown methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers at admission. DESIGN: two prospective case-control studies. SUBJECTS: 1,621 elderly patients were screened for MRSA carriage within 24 hours after admission to a geriatric hospital in Geneva, Switzerland. METHODS: risk factors associated with previously unknown MRSA carriage were determined in the derivation group, and the resulting risk score was evaluated in the validation cohort using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: prevalence of MRSA carriage at admission increased from 7.3% (53/724 patients) in 2001 to 8.7% (78/897 patients) in 2003, with a corresponding prevalence of unknown MRSA carriers of 4.6 and 5.8%, respectively. Three variables were independently associated with previously unknown MRSA carriage: recent antibiotic treatment (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.3; 95% CI 1.0-5.1), intra-hospital transfer (aOR 2.5; 95% CI 1.2-5.3), and hospitalization in the past 2 years (aOR 2.7; 95% CI 1.1-6.7). In the validation cohort, the probability of MRSA carriage increased across risk scores: 0 point, 4% prevalence (6/146); 1 point, 15% (21/136); and $2 points, 31% (21/68; P<0.001). The risk score showed good discrimination and calibration in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: our risk score, which used a simple additive point system to estimate the likelihood of unknown MRSA carriage, had good accuracy and generalised well in an independent sample of patients. Once validated in a clinical trial, our risk score may be used as a tool to optimise MRSA control.     

Development and validation of a bedside risk score for MRSA among patients hospitalized with complicated skin and skin structure infections

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a frequent cause of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI). Patients with MRSA require different empiric treatment that those with non-MRSA infections, yet no accurate tools exist to aid in stratifying the risk for a MRSA cSSSI. Objectives. To develop a simple bedside decision rule to tailor empiric coverage more accurately. METHODS: We conducted a large multicenter (N=62 hospitals) retrospective cohort study in a US-based database between April 2005 and March 2009. All adult initial admissions with ICD-9-CM codes specific to cSSSI were included. Patients admitted with MRSA vs. non-MRSA were compared with regard to baseline demographic, clinical and hospital characteristics. We developed and validated a model to predict the risk of MRSA, and compared its performance via sensitivity, specificity and other classification statistics to the healthcare-associated (HCA) infection risk factors. RESULTS: Of the 7,183 patients with cSSSI, 2,387 (33.2%) had MRSA. Factors discriminating MRSA from non-MRSA were age, African-American race, no evidence of diabetes mellitus, cancer or renal dysfunction, and prior history of cardiac dysrhythmia. The score ranging from 0 to 8 points exhibited a consistent dose-response relationship. A MRSA score of 5 or higher was superior to the HCA classification in all characteristics, while that of 4 or higher was superior on all metrics except specificity. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA is present in 1/3 of all hospitalized cSSSI. A simple bedside risk score can help discriminate the risk for MRSA vs. other pathogens with improved accuracy compared to the HCA definition.     

Evaluating the probability of previously unknown carriage of MRSA at hospital admission

Purpose

We determined the prevalence and risk profile of patients with previously unknown carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at hospital admission.

Subjects and methods

We conducted a 7-month, prospective case-controlled study in adult inpatients admitted to a university hospital with endemic MRSA. Multivariate conditional logistic regression for data sets matched 1:4 was performed to identify the risk profile of newly identified MRSA carriers.

Results

Overall, 399 of 12 072 screened admissions (prevalence, 3.3%) were found colonized (n = 368, 92%) or infected (n = 31, 8%) with MRSA. In 204 cases (prevalence, 1.7%), MRSA carriage was newly identified. Without screening on admission, 49% (196/399) of MRSA carriers would have been missed. We identified nine independent risk factors for newly identified MRSA carriage at admission (adjusted odds ratio): male sex (1.9); age greater than 75 years (2.0); receipt of fluoroquinolones (2.7), cephalosporins (2.1), and carbapenems (3.2) in the last 6 months; previous hospitalization (1.9) or intravenous therapy (1.7) during the last 12 months; urinary catheter at admission (2.0); and intrahospital transfer (2.4). A risk score (range, 0-13) was calculated by adding points assigned to these variables. On the basis of analysis of 1006 patients included in the case-controlled study, the probability of MRSA carriage was 8% (28/342) in patients with a low score (≤1), 19% (92/482) in patients with an intermediate score (2-4), and 46% (84/182) in patients with a high score (≥5). The risk score had good discrimination (c-statistic, 0.73) and showed excellent calibration (P = .88).

Conclusions

On-admission prevalence of previously unknown MRSA carriers was high. Applying the risk score to newly admitted patients with an intermediate or high probability of MRSA carriage could allow a more effective MRSA control strategy.     

Screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage on admission to a geriatric hospital

Our objective is to identify risk factors for carriage of MRSA on admission to a geriatric hospital where MRSA is endemic. A prospective screening for MRSA carriage was conducted by swabbing anterior nares and anal skin for 6 weeks. One hundred and thirty-eight patients aged over 65 were enrolled after obtaining their informed consent. Swabs of anterior nares and anal skin of patients were submitted for culture for MRSA. The demographic, administrative, and clinical data for each participant were recorded, and their association with MRSA carriage was determined by stepwise regression analysis. MRSA was recovered from 11 patients (11/138 patients, 8.0%), and from anal skin in 8 of them. Without screening of anal skin, 5 out of 11 carriers had been missed. Multivariate analysis revealed that hypoalbuminemia (adjusted risk ratio, RR = 6.39, 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.08–37.84) and bedridden status (RR = 8.26, CI = 1.04–65.31) were independent risk factors. Screening of elderly patients for gastrointestinal colonization on admission had implications for early detection of the reservoir of MRSA. Systematic selective screening for MRSA carriage targeting high-risk patients with hypoalbuminemia or bedridden status would be useful for infection control of this resistant organism.     

Community-acquired methicillin-resistant <Emphasis Type="Italic">Staphylococcus aureus</Emphasis>: Epidemiology and potential virulence factors

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been isolated from patients in the community. Some of these strains may have origins in the hospital, but others appear to be novel and unrelated to known hospital strains. Community MRSA strains have several distinguishing characteristics that may enable them to more readily colonize and infect otherwise healthy individuals. This article reviews recent publications addressing the epidemiology of MRSA in the community, risk factors associated with carriage, potentially associated virulence factors, and concepts of strain fitness as they pertain to MRSA. MRSA likely will be an increasingly important pathogen in the community.     

Aerosolized vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA after lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is the only life-prolonging therapy available for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients with end-stage lung disease. The presence of pathogens in the airways of CF patients prior to transplantation is the major risk factor for infection in the post-transplantation period, with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) having a growing impact. Aerosolized vancomycin has been used successfully in the treatment of MRSA in the CF population but its use after lung transplantation has not been previously reported. We report the case of a lung transplant recipient who was successfully treated for MRSA infection with aerosolized vancomycin.     

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the other emerging resistant gram-positive coccus among liver transplant recipients.

We undertook a study of the characteristics and clinical impact of infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) after liver transplantation. Of 165 patients who received liver transplants at our institution from 1990 through 1998, 38 (23%) developed MRSA infections. The predominant sources of infection were vascular catheters (39%; n=15), wound (18%; n=7), abdomen (18%; n=7), and lung (13%; n=5). A significant increase in MRSA infections (as a percentage of transplant patients infected per year) occurred over time (P=.0001). This increase was greater among intensive care unit patients (P=.001) than among nonintensive care unit hospital patients (P=.17). Cytomegalovirus seronegativity (P=.01) and primary cytomegalovirus infection were significantly associated with MRSA infections (P=.005). Thirty-day mortality among patients with MRSA infections was 21% (8/38). Mortality was 86% in patients with bacteremic MRSA pneumonia or abdominal infection and 6% in those with catheter-related bacteremia (P=.004). Thus the incidence of MRSA infection has increased exponentially among our liver transplant recipients since 1990. These infections have unique risk factors, time of onset, and a significant difference in site-specific mortality; deep-seated bacteremic infections, in particular, portend a grave outcome.     

The risk of persistent carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The clinical course of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients was retrospectively analyzed to determine whether carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a risk factor for MRSA infection during the neutropenic period. We studied four patients in whom MRSA colonies developed before HSCT. Two patients were previously diagnosed as having MRSA infection and two were carriers of MRSA. We tried to eliminate MRSA before HSCT and succeeded in eradication in two patients. MRSA infection did not develop in one patient who received prophylactic administration of vancomycin (VCM), but MRSA-induced phlegmon developed during neutropenia in one patient who did not receive prophylaxis. Of the other two patients who had been persistently positive for MRSA, MRSA did not develop in one patient who received prophylaxis, but the another patient who did not receive prophylaxis died from MRSA-induced sepsis in the early post-transplant period. We therefore recommend that MRSA be eliminated by prophylactic administration of anti-MRSA drugs such as VCM before HSCT when patients have persistent MRSA.