Effects of GABA and various allosteric ligands on TBPS binding to cloned rat GABA(A) receptor subtypes.

1. [35S]t-butylbicyclophosphorothionate (TBPS) is a high affinity ligand for the picrotoxin site of GABA(A) receptors. Here we examined TBPS binding to the cloned receptors made of alpha 1, alpha 3 or alpha 6 in combination with beta 2 or beta 2 and gamma 2 subunits, in the presence of GABA and several allosteric ligands (diazepam, methyl 6,7-dimethoxy-4-methyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate (DMCM), 3 alpha,21-dihydroxy-5 alpha-pregnan-20-one (5 alpha-THDOC), pentobarbitone and Zn). The cloned receptors were transiently expressed in SF-9 insect cells by infecting with recombinant baculoviruses. 2. In alpha beta subtypes, GABA at nanomolar concentrations enhanced TBPS binding but inhibited binding at micromolar concentrations. Half maximal GABA concentrations for enhancement or inhibition of TBPS binding were correlated with high and low affinity GABA binding sites, respectively, in individual subtypes. The maximal enhancement of binding also varied according to the alpha isoform (alpha 3 beta 2 >> alpha 1 beta 2). In alpha beta gamma subtypes, TBPS binding was unaffected by GABA at nanomolar concentrations, but was inhibited by GABA at micromolar concentrations. Addition of gamma 2 thus appeared to abolish conformational coupling between high affinity GABA sites and TBPS sites, and also altered low affinity GABA sites; in particular, the half maximal GABA concentration for inhibition of TBPS binding changed from > 100 (alpha 6 beta 2) to 1 microM (alpha 6 beta 2 gamma 2). 3. Allosteric ligands also altered TBPS binding to sensitive GABA(A) receptor subtypes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Agonist binding and function at the human alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor: allosteric modulation by amilorides

It has been found previously that amilorides act via an allosteric site on the alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor to strongly inhibit antagonist binding. In this study, allosteric modulation of agonist binding and function at the alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor was explored. The dissociation rate of the agonist [(3)H]UK14304 from alpha(2A)-receptors was decreased by the amilorides in a concentration-dependent manner. This contrasts with the increases in (3)H-antagonist dissociation rate found previously. The agonist-amiloride analog interaction data could be fitted to equations derived from the ternary complex allosteric model. The calculated log affinities of the amilorides at the [(3)H]UK14304-occupied receptor increased with the size of the 5-N-alkyl side chain and ranged from 2.4 for amiloride to 4.2 for 5-(N,N-hexamethylene)-amiloride. The calculated negative cooperativities cover a narrow range, in sharp contrast to the broad range found for antagonist-amiloride analog interactions. The effects of the amilorides on the agonist actions of UK14304, epinephrine, and norepinephrine were explored using a [(35)S]GTPgammaS functional assay, and the parameters calculated for the cooperativities and affinities of the UK14304-amiloride analog interactions, using the equation derived from the ternary complex allosteric model, were in good agreement with those derived from the kinetic studies. Therefore both the binding and functional data provide further support for the existence of a well defined allosteric site on the human alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor. The binding mode of the amilorides at the agonist-occupied and antagonist-occupied receptor differs markedly but, within each group, the structure of either the agonist or the antagonist examined has only a slight effect on the allosteric interactions.     

The NK(1) receptor antagonist WIN51708 reduces sensitization after chronic cocaine

We tested the tachykinin NK(1) receptor antagonist WIN51708 (17betahydroxy17alphaethynyl5alphaandrostanol[3,2b]pyrimido[1,2-a]benzimidazole) in a behavioral sensitization model. Rats were given 7 days of cocaine then 7 days of withdrawal to induce sensitization. Thereafter, another 7 days of cocaine with WIN51708 (2 mg/kg i.p.) given 3.5 h after each cocaine injection was given. WIN51708 reversed sensitization but had no effect on controls. NK(1) receptor antagonists may have use in stimulant abuse and schizophrenia treatment.     

Benzodiazepine modulation of partial agonist efficacy and spontaneously active GABA(A) receptors supports an allosteric model of modulation

Benzodiazepines (BZDs) have been used extensively for more than 40 years because of their high therapeutic index and low toxicity. Although BZDs are understood to act primarily as allosteric modulators of GABA(A) receptors, the mechanism of modulation is not well understood. The applicability of an allosteric model with two binding sites for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and one for a BZD-like modulator was investigated. This model predicts that BZDs should enhance the efficacy of partial agonists. Consistent with this prediction, diazepam increased the efficacy of the GABA(A) receptor partial agonist kojic amine in chick spinal cord neurons. To further test the validity of the model, the effects of diazepam, flurazepam, and zolpidem were examined using wild-type and spontaneously active mutant alpha1(L263S)beta3gamma2 GABA(A) receptors expressed in HEK-293 cells. In agreement with the predictions of the allosteric model, all three modulators acted as direct agonists for the spontaneously active receptors. The results indicate that BZD-like modulators enhance the amplitude of the GABA response by stabilizing the open channel active state relative to the inactive state by less than 1 kcal, which is similar to the energy of stabilization conferred by a single hydrogen bond.     

Mutation at the putative GABA(A) ion-channel gate reveals changes in allosteric modulation.

We have mutated a conserved leucine in the putative membrane-spanning domain to serine in human GABA(A) beta2 and investigated the actions of a number of GABA(A) agonists, antagonists and modulators on human alpha1beta2deltaL259Sgamma2s compared to wild type alpha1beta2gamma2s GABA(A) receptors, expressed in Xenopus oocytes. The mutation resulted in smaller maximum currents to gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) compared to alpha1beta2gamma2s receptors, and large leak currents resulting from spontaneous channel opening. As reported, this mutation significantly decreased the GABA EC50 (110 fold), and reduced desensitization. Muscimol and the partial agonists 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol (THIP) and piperidine-4-sulphonic acid (P4S) also displayed a decrease in EC50. In addition to competitively shifting GABA concentration response curves, the antagonists bicuculline and SR95531 both inhibited the spontaneous channel activity on alpha1beta2deltaL259Sgamma2s receptors, with different degrees of maximum inhibition. The effects of a range of allosteric modulators, including benzodiazepines and anaesthetics were examined on a submaximal GABA concentration (EC20). Compared to wild type, none of these modulators potentiated the EC20 response of alpha1beta2deltaL259Sgamma2s receptors, however they all directly activated the receptor in the absence of GABA. To conclude, the above mutation resulted in receptors which exhibit a degree of spontaneous activity, and are more sensitive to agonists. Benzodiazepines and other agents modulate constitutive activity, but positive modulation of GABA is lost. The competitive antagonists bicuculline and SR95531 can also act as allosteric channel modulators through the same GABA binding site.     

Differential effects of two major neurosteroids on cerebellar and cortical GABA(A) receptor binding and function

Cerebellar and cerebrocortical A-type γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA_A) receptors were examined in mice and rats. In wild-type mouse cerebellum, the agonists GABA and gaboxadol exerted heterogeneous displacement of [³H]ethynylbicycloorthobenzoate (EBOB) binding with nanomolar and submicromolar affinities. In mouse cerebella lacking α6 subunits (α6KO), nanomolar displacement by GABA agonists was absent, while micromolar displacement was potentiated to 12-fold by 0.3 μM 5α-tetrahydrodeoxycorticosterone (5α-THDOC). In α6KO cerebellum, 60% of [³H]EBOB binding was neurosteroid-insensitive, while 5α-THDOC elicited enhancement with EC₅₀ = 150 nM instead of nanomolar displacement. In conclusion, nanomolar displacement of cerebellar [³H]EBOB binding by GABA agonists and neurosteroids can be attributed to GABA_A receptors containing α6 and δ subunits. In contrast, [³H]EBOB binding to rat cerebral cortex was affected by allopregnanolone and 5α-THDOC in bidirectional manner with nanomolar enhancement (EC₅₀ ~ 80 nM) and micromolar displacement. Nonequilibrium binding conditions with decreased incubation time tripled the maximal enhancement of [³H]EBOB binding by 5α-THDOC. 5ß-THDOC enhanced the cortical [³H]EBOB binding with EC₅₀ ~ 0.5 μM and it attenuated bidirectional modulation by 5α-THDOC. Allopregnanolone and 5α-THDOC produced biphasic enhancements of chloride currents elicited by 1 μM GABA in cerebellar granule cells, for 5α-THDOC with EC_50,1 ~ 16 nM and EC_50,2 ~ 1.3 μM. Differences in peak current enhancements in the absence minus presence of 0.1 mM furosemide corresponding to α6ßδ GABA_A receptors were augmented only by micromolar 5α-THDOC while the difference curve for allopregnanolone was polyphasic as without furosemide. Consequently, these neurosteroids differentially affected the binding and function of various GABA_A receptor populations.     

Physiological modulation of GABA(A) receptor plasticity by progesterone metabolites.

The possible functional relation between changes in brain and plasma concentrations of neurosteroids and the plasticity of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptors in the brain during pregnancy and after delivery was investigated in rats. The concentrations in the cerebral cortex and plasma of pregnenolone as well as of progesterone and its neuroactive derivatives allopregnanolone (3alpha-hydroxy-5alpha-pregnan-20-one) and allotetrahydrodeoxycorticosterone (5alpha-hydroxy-3alpha,21-diol-20-one) increased during pregnancy, peaking around day 19, before returning to control (estrus) values immediately before delivery (day 21). In the postpartum period, steroid concentrations in plasma and brain did not differ from control values. The densities of [3H]GABA, [3H]flunitrazepam, and t-[35S]butylbicyclophosphorotionate (TBPS) binding sites in the cerebral cortex also increased during pregnancy, again peaking on day 19 and returning to control values on day 21; receptor density was decreased further 2 days after delivery and again returned to control values within 7 days. These changes were accompanied by a decrease in the apparent affinity of the binding sites for the corresponding ligand on day 19 of pregnancy. The amount of the gamma2L subunit mRNA decreased progressively during pregnancy, in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus, returned to control value around the time of delivery and did not change in the postpartum period. On the contrary, the amount of alpha4 subunit mRNA was not modified during pregnancy both in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus whereas significantly increased 7 days after delivery only in the hippocampus. No significant changes were apparent for alpha1, alpha2, alpha3, beta1, beta2, beta3 and gamma2S subunit mRNAs. Administration of finasteride, a specific 5alpha-reductase inhibitor, to pregnant rats from days 12 to 18 markedly reduced the increases in the plasma and brain concentrations of allopregnanolone and allotetrahydrodeoxycorticosterone as well as prevented both the increase in the densities of [3H]flunitrazepam and [35S]TBPS binding sites and the decrease of gamma2L mRNA normally observed during pregnancy. The results demonstrate that the changes in the plasticity of GABA(A) receptors that occur in rat brain during pregnancy and after delivery are related to the physiological changes in plasma and brain concentrations of neurosteroids.     

Flavonoid modulation of GABA(A) receptors

There has been a resurgence of interest in synthetic and plant-derived flavonoids as modulators of γ-amino butyric acid-A (GABA(A) ) receptor function influencing inhibition mediated by the major inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA in the brain. Areas of interest include (i) flavonoids that show subtype selectivity in recombinant receptor studies in vitro consistent with their behavioural effects in vivo, (ii) flumazenil-insensitive modulation of GABA(A) receptor function by flavonoids, (iii) the ability of some flavonoids to act as second-order modulators of first-order modulation by benzodiazepines and (iv) the identification of the different sites of action of flavonoids on GABA(A) receptor complexes. An emerging area of interest is the activation of GABA(A) receptors by flavonoids in the absence of GABA. The relatively rigid shape of flavonoids means that they are useful scaffolds for the design of new therapeutic agents. Like steroids, flavonoids have wide-ranging effects on numerous biological targets. The challenge is to understand the structural determinants of flavonoid effects on particular targets and to develop agents specific for these targets.     

Fishing for allosteric sites on GABA(A) receptors

GABA(A) receptors have structural and functional homology with a super-family of cys-loop ligand-gated ion channel receptors including the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Amino acid residues involved in ligand-binding pockets are homologous among super-family members, leading to the multiple-loop model of binding sites situated at subunit interfaces, validated by structural studies on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and water-soluble snail acetylcholine binding protein. This article will briefly review the literature on the agonist binding sites on the receptor super-family, and then describe the current situation for attempts to identify sites for allosteric modulators on the GABA(A) receptors. A combination of mutagenesis and photoaffinity labeling with anesthetic ligands has given some leads in this endeavor. Current work by others and ourselves focuses on three putative sites for modulators: (1) within the ion channel domain TM2, near the extracellular end; (2) the agonist binding sites and homologous pockets at other subunit interfaces of the pentameric receptor; and (3) on the linker region stretching from the agonist site loop C to the top of the TM1 region. It is likely that concrete structural information will be forthcoming soon.     

GABA(A) receptor function and pharmacology in epilepsy and status epilepticus

GABA(A) (gamma-n-aminobutyric acid) receptor dysfunction has long been implicated in the development of epilepsy and status epilepticus. Recent advances have been made in understanding the cellular, pharmacological and genetic involvement of GABA(A) receptors in seizure disorders. In particular, genetic mutations found in GABA(A) receptor subunits strongly implicate the GABA(A) receptor in idiopathic generalised epilepsies.     

Subunit composition,distribution and function of GABA(A) receptor subtypes

GABA(A) receptors are the major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in the brain and are the site of action of many clinically important drugs. These receptors are composed of five subunits that can belong to eight different subunit classes. Depending on their subunit composition, these receptors exhibit distinct pharmacological and electrophysiological properties. Recent studies on recombinant and native GABA(A) receptors suggest the existence of far more receptor subtypes than previously assumed. Thus, receptors composed of one, two, three, four, or five different subunits might exist in the brain. Studies on the regional, cellular and subcellular distribution of GABA(A) receptor subunits, and on the co-localization of these subunits at the light and electron microscopic level for the first time provide information on the distribution of GABA(A) receptor subtypes in the brain. These studies will have to be complemented by electrophysiological and pharmacological studies on the respective recombinant and native receptors to finally identify the receptor subtypes present in the brain. The distinct cellular and subcellular location of individual receptor subtypes suggests that they exhibit specific functions in the brain that can be selectively modulated by subtype specific drugs. This conclusion is supported by the recent demonstration that different GABA(A) receptor subtypes mediate different effects of benzodiazepines. Together, these results should cause a revival of GABA(A) receptor research and strongly stimulate the development of drugs with a higher selectivity for alpha2-, alpha3-, or alpha5-subunit-containing receptor subtypes. Such drugs might exhibit quite selective clinical effects.     

Principles of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor allosteric modulation

N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are glutamate-gated ion channels with complex participation in synaptic transmission, integration, and plasticity. They are highly permeable to Ca(2+), activate with characteristic kinetics, and generate currents with distinct amplitudes according to stimulation frequency. Multiple endogenous and pharmacological agents bind at distinct locations throughout the protein and modulate NMDA receptor responses with allosteric mechanisms. The NMDA receptor activation pathway consists of a series of consecutive, stepwise structural rearrangements rather than a binary, closed-open reaction. This high-resolution multistate gating reaction is used here to investigate the effects of ideal, state-specific modulators on physiologically relevant parameters of the macroscopic responses to single-pulse and high-frequency repetitive stimulation. The simulations suggest three significant aspects of NMDA receptor modulation: 1) modest, 1 kcal/mol bidirectional perturbations in receptor free energy cause up to a 50-fold change in the total charge transferred; 2) activators modulate primarily the response time course, whereas inhibitors are more effectively modulating current peak amplitude; and 3) state-specific modulators have opposite effects on charge transfer and current potentiation by high-frequency stimulation. The results imply that the magnitude of the NMDA receptor-mediated Ca(2+) influx and the receptor's ability to discriminate stimulation frequency can be controlled separately. Thus, a detailed mechanistic characterization of NMDA receptor allosteric effectors may identify function-specific modulators and provides a road map for the development of combinatorial strategies for local, transient tuning of specific receptor functions.     

Abuse and dependence liability of benzodiazepine-type drugs: GABA(A) receptor modulation and beyond

Over the past several decades, benzodiazepines and the newer non-benzodiazepines have become the anxiolytic/hypnotics of choice over the more readily abused barbiturates. While all drugs from this class act at the GABA(A) receptor, benzodiazepine-type drugs offer the clear advantage of being safer and better tolerated. However, there is still potential for these drugs to be abused, and significant evidence exists to suggest that this is a growing problem. This review examines the behavioral determinants of the abuse and dependence liability of benzodiazepine-type drugs. Moreover, the pharmacological and putative biochemical basis of the abuse-related behavior is discussed.     

Receptor subtype-dependent positive and negative modulation of GABA(A) receptor function by niflumic acid,a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug

In addition to blocking cyclooxygenases, members of the fenamate group of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been proposed to affect brain GABAA receptors. Using quantitative autoradiography with GABAA receptor-associated ionophore ligand [35S]t-butylbicyclophosphorothionate (TBPS) on rat brain sections, one of the fenamates, niflumate, at micromolar concentration was found to potentiate GABA actions in most brain areas, whereas being in the cerebellar granule cell layer an efficient antagonist similar to furosemide. With recombinant GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, we found that niflumate potentiated 3 microM GABA responses up to 160% and shifted the GABA concentration-response curve to the left in alpha1beta2gamma2 receptors, the predominant GABAA receptor subtype in the brain. This effect needed the gamma2 subunit, because on alpha1beta2 receptors, niflumate exhibited solely an antagonistic effect at high concentrations. The potentiation was not abolished by the specific benzodiazepine site antagonist flumazenil. Niflumate acted as a potent antagonist of alpha6beta2 receptors (with or without gamma2 subunit) and of alphaXbeta2gamma2 receptors containing a chimeric alpha1 to alpha6 subunit, which suggests that niflumate antagonism is dependent on the same transmembrane domain 1- and 2-including fragment of the alpha6 subunit as furosemide antagonism. This antagonism was noncompetitive because the maximal GABA response, but not the potency, was reduced by niflumate. These data show receptor subtype-dependent positive and negative modulatory actions of niflumate on GABAA receptors at clinically relevant concentrations, and they suggest the existence of a novel positive modulatory site on alpha1beta2gamma2 receptors that is dependent on the gamma2 subunit but not associated with the benzodiazepine binding site.     

Anxioselective compounds acting at the GABA(A) receptor benzodiazepine binding site

With the exception of obsessive compulsive disorder, benzodiazepines (BZs) remain a major first line treatment for anxiety disorders. However, as well as being anxiolytic, BZs also cause sedation acutely, related to the fact that BZs are also used as hypnotics, and chronically may have abuse potential as well as cause physical dependence which manifests itself as the demonstration of a number of adverse events upon discontinuation. The molecular mechanisms of BZs are now well defined in that they enhance the actions of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA by binding to a specific recognition site on GABA(A) receptors containing alpha1, alpha2, alpha3 and alpha5 subunits. Compounds that bind at this modulatory site and enhance the inhibitory actions of GABA are classified as agonists, those that decrease the actions of GABA are termed inverse agonists whereas compounds which bind but have no effect on GABA inhibition are termed antagonists. The clinically used BZs are full agonists and between the opposite ends of the spectrum, i.e. full agonist and full inverse agonist, are a range of compounds with differing degrees of efficacy, such as partial agonists and partial inverse agonists. Attempts have been made to develop compounds which are anxioselective in that they retain the anxiolytic properties of the full agonist BZs but have reduced sedation and dependence (withdrawal) liabilities. Such compounds may interact with all four (i.e. alpha1-, alpha2-, alpha3- and alpha5-containing) GABA(A) receptor subtypes and have partial rather than full agonist efficacies. Examples of nonselective partial agonists include bretazenil, imidazenil, FG 8205, abecarnil, NS 2710, pagoclone, RWJ-51204 and (S)-desmethylzopiclone. Alternatively, a compound might have comparable binding affinity but different efficacies at the various subtypes, thereby preferentially exerting its effects at subtypes thought to be associated with anxiety (alpha2- and/or alpha3-containing receptors) rather than the subtype associated with sedation (alpha1-containing receptors). Examples of efficacy selective compounds include L-838417, NGD 91-3 and SL651498. For each compound, preclinical and where available clinical data will be reviewed. Emerging themes include the lack of definitive intrinsic efficacy data for certain compounds (e.g. abecarnil, ocinaplon, pagoclone) and the difficulty in translating robust anxiolysis and a separation between anxiolytic and sedative doses of non-selective partial agonists in preclinical species into consistent clinical benefit in man (e.g. bretazenil, abecarnil, pagoclone). With respect to efficacy selective compounds, NGD 91-3 was not anxiolytic in man but in the absence of efficacy data, these results are difficult to interpret. Nevertheless, efficacy selective compounds represent a novel approach to targeting specific subtypes of the GABA(A) receptor, the ultimate test of which will be evaluation in the clinic.     

Neuroprotective agent riluzole potentiates postsynaptic GABA(A) receptor function.

The antiepileptic drug riluzole is a use-dependent blocker of voltage-gated Na(+) channels and selectively depresses action potential-driven glutamate over gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) release. Here we report that in addition to its presynaptic effect, riluzole at higher concentrations also strongly potentiates postsynaptic GABA(A) responses both in cultured hippocampal neurons and in Xenopus oocytes expressing recombinant receptors. Although peak inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) of autaptic hippocampal neurons were inhibited, 20-100 microM riluzole significantly prolonged the decay of IPSCs, resulting in little change in total charge transfer. The effect was dose-dependent and reversible. Riluzole selectively increased miniature IPSC fast and slow decay time constants, without affecting their relative proportions. Miniature IPSC peak amplitude, rise time and frequency were unaffected, indicating a postsynaptic mechanism. In the Xenopus oocyte expression system, riluzole potentiated GABA responses by lowering the EC(50) for GABA activation. Riluzole directly gated a GABA(A) current that was partially blocked by bicuculline and gabazine. Pharmacological experiments suggest that the action of riluzole did not involve a benzodiazepine, barbiturate, or neurosteroid site. Instead, riluzole-induced potentiation was inhibited by the lactone antagonist alpha-isopropyl-alpha-methyl-gamma-butyrolatone (alpha-IMGBL). While most anticonvulsants either block voltage-gated Na(+) channels or potentiate GABA(A) receptors, our results suggest that riluzole may define an advantageous class of anticonvulsants with both effects.     

Differential allosteric modulation by amiloride analogues of agonist and antagonist binding at A(1) and A(3) adenosine receptors

The diuretic drug amiloride and its analogues were found previously to be allosteric modulators of antagonist binding to A(2A) adenosine receptors. In this study, the possibility of the allosteric modulation by amiloride analogues of antagonist binding at A(1) and A(3) receptors, as well as agonist binding at A(1), A(2A), and A(3) receptors, was explored. Amiloride analogues increased the dissociation rates of two antagonist radioligands, [3H]8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine ([3H]DPCPX) and [3H]8-ethyl-4-methyl-2-phenyl-(8R)-4,5,7,8-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo[2,1-i]purin-5-one ([3H]PSB-11), from A(1) and A(3) receptors, respectively. Amiloride and 5-(N,N-dimethyl)amiloride (DMA) were more potent at A(1) receptors than at A(3) receptors, while 5-(N,N-hexamethylene)amiloride (HMA) was more potent at A(3) receptors. Thus, amiloride analogues are allosteric inhibitors of antagonist binding at A(1), A(2A), and A(3) adenosine receptor subtypes. In contrast to their effects on antagonist-occupied receptors, amiloride analogues did not affect the dissociation rates of the A(1) agonist [3H]N(6)-[(R)-phenylisopropyl]adenosine ([3H]R-PIA) from A(1) receptors or the A(2A) agonist [3H]2-[p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenyl-ethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine ([3H]CGS21680) from A(2A) receptors. The dissociation rate of the A(3) agonist radioligand [125I]N(6)-(4-amino-3-iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide ([125I]I-AB-MECA) from A(3) receptors was decreased significantly by amiloride analogues. The binding modes of amiloride analogues at agonist-occupied and antagonist-occupied receptors differed markedly, which was demonstrated in all three subtypes of adenosine receptors tested in this study. The effects of the amiloride analogues on the action of the A(3) receptor agonist were explored further using a cyclic AMP functional assay in intact CHO cells expressing the human A(3) receptor. Both binding and functional assays support the allosteric interactions of amiloride analogues with A(3) receptors.     

G protein-coupled receptor heteromerization: a role in allosteric modulation of ligand binding

It is becoming increasingly recognized that G protein-coupled receptors physically interact. These interactions may provide a mechanism for allosteric modulation of receptor function. In this study, we examined this possibility by using an established model system of a receptor heteromer consisting of μ and δ opioid receptors. We examined the effect of a number of μ receptor ligands on the binding equilibrium and association and dissociation kinetics of a radiolabeled δ receptor agonist, [(3)H]deltorphin II. We also examined the effect of δ receptor ligands on the binding equilibrium and association and dissociation kinetics of a radiolabeled μ receptor agonist, [(3)H][d-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin ([(3)H]DAMGO). We show that μ receptor ligands are capable of allosterically enhancing δ receptor radioligand binding and vice versa. Thus, there is strong positive cooperativity between the two receptor units with remarkable consequences for ligand pharmacology. We find that the data can be simulated by adapting an allosteric receptor model previously developed for small molecules, suggesting that the ligand-occupied protomers function as allosteric modulators of the partner receptor's activity.