Updated metaanalysis of steroid withdrawal in renal transplant patients on calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil

During the 1990s two metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials of steroid withdrawal after renal transplantation showed significant increases in acute rejection episodes and graft failure rates. A recently published metaanalysis of steroid withdrawal in patients on a calcineurin inhibitor and MMF included randomized clinical trials. We have updated this study, searching more publications during the last 2 years. Finally, the same six trials were included, four in patients receiving cyclosporine and two tacrolimus. Risk ratio (RR) for acute rejection was 2.28 [95%CI 1.65-3.16, P < .00001], and pooled risk difference (RD) was 0.08 [0.05-0.11, P < .001], indicating that the proportion of patients with acute rejection episodes after prednisone withdrawal was significantly higher compared with controls. RR for graft failure was 0.73 [0.42-1.28, P = .27], and RD was -0.01 [-0.03-0.01, P = .28], indicating that the proportion of patients with graft failure after withdrawal was not significantly different from that of controls. Total cholesterol was significantly lower after steroid withdrawal (weighted mean difference -0.53 mumol/L [-0.70--0.36, P < .0001]). Renal allograft recipients on triple therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor, MMF, and steroids are at low but significant risk of acute rejection after steroid withdrawal, but do not suffer an increased risk of early graft failure. It is necessary to extend controlled follow-up to confirm graft function stabilization.     

A meta-analysis of immunosuppression withdrawal trials in renal transplantation

Since the publication of previous meta-analyses of cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone withdrawal in renal transplant recipients, several additional randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up have been reported. Currently, in nine prednisone withdrawal trials (n = 1461), the proportion of patients with acute rejection was increased by 0.14 (95% confidence interval = 0.10 to 0. 17, P < 0.001). In nine prednisone withdrawal trials (n = 1899), the relative risk (RR; RR = 1.0 indicates no risk) of graft failure after withdrawal was also increased (RR = 1.40; range, 1.09 to 1.70, P = 0.012). There was no evidence of between-study heterogeneity for either acute rejection or graft failure in the prednisone withdrawal trials by a chi(2) test (P > 0.05). In 10 CsA withdrawal trials (n = 1049), the proportion of patients with acute rejection was increased by 0.11 (0.07 to 0.15, P < 0.001). In 12 trials (n = 1151), the RR of graft failure after CsA withdrawal was 1.06 (95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.29, P = 0.646), but a chi(2) test indicated that there was study heterogeneity. However, there was no evidence of heterogeneity in the six studies (n = 632) with at least 4.0 yr (5.8 +/- 1.7) of follow-up (RR = 0.92; range, 0.64 to 1.20, P = 0.569) or in the seven trials (n = 962) published in peer-reviewed journals (RR = 0.95; range, 0.70 to 1.20 P = 0.682). Finally, in three trials (n = 259) that compared CsA and prednisone withdrawal, there was a nonsignificant trend for less graft failure with CsA withdrawal (RR = 0.63; range, 0.08 to 1.16, P = 0.190). Thus, unlike prednisone withdrawal, CsA withdrawal in select patients seems to impart little risk of long-term graft failure.     

Steroid withdrawal increases risk of acute rejection but reduces infection: a meta-analysis of 1681 cases in renal transplantation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of steroid withdrawal in renal transplantation recipients. METHODS: These following databases were searched: Medline (1966 to September 2005), OVID (1966 to 2004), Embase (1984 to 2004), Cochrane library (issue 4, 2005), Highwire (1849 to September 2005), American Transplant Congress (2005), Chinese Biomedicine database (CBM 1994 to 2005). The safety was measured by the following factors: patient and graft survival, acute rejection, chronic rejection, infection, serum creatinine. We performed meta-analysis by using Revman 4.2.7. RESULTS: Nine randomized clinical trials were identified to have a steroid withdrawal and a steroid continuing group. They included 1681 patients: 845 with steroid withdrawal and 836 with continuing steroid. The risk of acute rejection after steroid withdrawal was two times higher than steroid-continuing group (RR 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.54, 2.72; P < .00001), while the incidence of opportunistic infection and urinary tract infection of steroid withdrawal group were lower than the control group (RR 0.80; 95%CI 0.64, 1.00; P = .05 vs RR 0.74; 95%CI, 0.60, 0.92; P = .004, respectively). The graft and patient survivals, chronic rejection, and serum creatinine were similar to the steroid continuing group. CONCLUSION: Steroid withdrawal can significantly increase the risk of acute rejection episodes, but reduces the incidence of infection to a certain extent. To prophylaxis against serious infection, steroid withdrawal is worth considering using a sufficient immunosuppressive regimen. The key point is to balance the benefit and harm for the individual recipient.     

Meta-analysis of calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimens in kidney transplantation

Calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing strategies in kidney transplantation may spare patients the adverse effects of these drugs, but the efficacy of these strategies is unknown. Here, we conduct a meta-analysis to assess outcomes associated with reducing calcineurin inhibitor exposure from the time of transplantation. We search Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2010 that compared de novo calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimens to calcineurin-inhibitor-based regimens. In this analysis, we include 56 studies comprising data from 11337 renal transplant recipients. Use of the contemporary agents belatacept or tofacitinib, in combination with mycophenolate, decreased the odds of overall graft failure (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.39-0.96; P = 0.03). Similarly, minimization of calcineurin inhibitors in combination with various induction and adjunctive agents reduces the odds of graft failure (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.58-0.92; P = 0.009). Conversely, the use of inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), in combination with mycophenolate, increases the odds of graft failure (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.08-1.90; P = 0.01). Calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing strategies are associated with less delayed graft function (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.80-0.98; P = 0.02), improved graft function, and less new-onset diabetes. The more contemporary protocols did not seem to increase rates of acute rejection. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that reducing exposure to calcineurin inhibitors immediately after kidney transplantation may improve clinical outcomes.     

Renal transplantation with early steroid withdrawal

Steroids are effective immunosuppressants in renal transplantation but are associated with significant adverse effects. As a result, there has been increased interest in protocols utilizing steroid minimization. Initial trials stopped steroids at approximately 3 months, when the highest risk phase for acute rejection was over. As two randomized trials using cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil without induction therapy showed an unacceptably high acute rejection rate, more recent interest has focused on the cessation of steroids very early, usually within the first week after transplantation. Most protocols have used antibody induction combined with calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolic acid derivatives. Uncontrolled studies have shown a low rate of acute rejection, but the most recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated an increased risk of acute rejection. These trials have not shown any consistent difference in short-term patient or graft survival. Cardiovascular risk factors do not appear to be consistently improved by early steroid withdrawal. Most trials lack sufficient follow-up (5 years or more) to assess the impact of the increased acute rejection rate seen with early steroid withdrawal on long-term outcomes. Thus, the use of such protocols remains investigational.     

Steroid withdrawal or steroid avoidance in renal transplant recipients: focus on tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens

Steroid-induced adverse effects after transplantation include cosmetic, metabolic, and cardiovascular complications. Steroid withdrawal or avoidance with cyclosporine-based regimens have been hampered by an unacceptably high rate of acute rejections and increased rates of graft loss. Recently the results of several large, randomized trials of steroid withdrawal/avoidance with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients became available. A review of these trials appeared to be of clinical interest. Data from the THOMAS trial clearly indicate that steroid withdrawal from a regimen of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), steroids after 3 months after transplantation is safe with regard to acute rejection rate and graft survival. If an induction therapy with daclizumab is used in combination with tacrolimus and MMF (CARMEN trial), even steroid avoidance is safe with regard to acute rejection rate and graft survival. Finally, in the ATLAS trial, steroid avoidance with basiliximab in combination with tacrolimus (resulting in tacrolimus monotherapy) or alternatively with tacrolimus and MMF both resulted in similar graft survival, but higher rates of acute rejection. In conclusion, steroid withdrawal is safe from a triple-drug regimen of tacrolimus, MMF, and steroids after 3 months after transplantation, and steroid use may completely be avoided with tacrolimus, and MMF combined with daclizumab induction. Tacrolimus monotherapy may be achieved using basiliximab induction at the price of higher rates of acute rejection, but with unaffected graft survival. Thus tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with or without interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction has made steroid withdrawal or avoidance a realistic option in renal transplantation.     

Predictive factors of acute rejection after early cyclosporine withdrawal in renal transplant recipients who receive mycophenolate mofetil: results from a prospective, randomized trial

The aim of this randomized, open-labeled trial was to compare the incidence of acute rejection after an early (3 mo posttransplantation) withdrawal of cyclosporine (CsA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in renal transplantation. Among 218 eligible recipients, 108 nonsensitized, rejection-free patients who were under a triple drug regimen (CsA-MMF-prednisone) and had received a first kidney from a deceased donor were enrolled. At 3 mo after graft, they were gradually withdrawn from CsA (MMF group, n = 54) or MMF (CsA group, n = 54). A graft biopsy and a pharmacokinetic study of CsA and mycophenolic acid were systematically performed before the randomization. At 1 yr, graft and patient survival rates were 100% in each group. Renal function was improved in the MMF group compared with the CsA group (Cockcroft calculated clearance 64.7 +/- 18.7 versus 56.5 +/- 18.0 ml/min; P = 0.023). However, the probability of acute rejection was higher in the MMF group (18.5 versus 5.6%; P = 0.045). The 10 patients who developed acute rejection after CsA withdrawal had a significantly higher incidence of borderline changes on the randomization biopsy than the 44 rejection-free patients (five of 10 versus eight of 44; P = 0.034), and they displayed a lower area under the curve of mycophenolic acid (43 +/- 9 versus 58 +/- 22 mg/h per L; P = 0.045). Multivariate analysis confirmed that borderline changes and area under the curve of mycophenolic acid were significant risk factors of acute rejection after CsA discontinuation. It is concluded that a systematic graft biopsy and a pharmacokinetic study of mycophenolic acid are needed to reduce the risk for acute rejection after CsA withdrawal.     

Calcineurin Inhibitors in Renal Transplantation Still Needed but in Reduced Doses: A Review

Despite their contribution in the success of organ transplantation, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) may be responsible for frequent and severe side effects that can affect graft survival and life expectancy. In this article, we have reviewed registry studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that seek to avoid, withdraw, or minimize CNIs in renal transplant recipients. Attempts to completely avoid CNIs by administering mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and/or sirolimus (SRL) have resulted in increased risks of rejection and side effects, with small advantage to improve renal graft function. Early withdrawal of CNIs after transplantation using administration of MMF can improve graft function but may be associated with a greater risk of acute or chronic rejection and graft failure. RCTs in which CNIs were replaced a few months after transplantation by SRL reported improved graft function among SRL-treated patients, but such a treatment was complicated by iatrogenic toxicity. Late replacement of CNIs with SRL did not produce a particular advantage and again was complicated by more frequent side effects. On the basis of these trials, it seems that CNI elimination can trigger rejection or side effects. Recent RCTs showed that minimization of CNI doses in association with everolimus does not increase the risk of rejection, allows one to obtain good graft function, and is well tolerated. Such an approach seems therefore preferable to complete elimination of CNIs with substitution of the current immunosuppressive drugs.     

Steroids can be safely withdrawn from cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil-treated renal allograft recipients: long-term results

BACKGROUND: Discontinuation of steroids has long been a goal of transplant teams. However, whether this strategy is associated or not with a higher risk of long-term graft loss has not been resolved. METHODS: The authors analyzed a cohort of 91 renal allograft recipients who underwent transplantation between 1993 and 1997. They were treated with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and then had steroids withdrawn. Inclusion criteria were as follows: serum creatinine lower than 133 microM, first or second renal transplants, no or only one acute rejection episode (borderline or Ia grade), and a peak of panel reactive antibodies under 50%. Prednisone was gradually tapered off and then discontinued over a period of 2 to 4 months. RESULTS: There were no episodes of acute rejection after steroid withdrawal. Whether steroids were withdrawn before (early) or after (late) 6 months of renal transplantation did not influence outcome. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, patient survival was 93.6% and 100% at 5 years and 93.6% and 97.6% at 10 years in the early and late steroid withdrawal groups, respectively. Graft survival was 94.3% and 98.1% at 5 years and 87.6% and 82.4% at 10 years in the early and late steroid-withdrawal groups, respectively. Risk factors for graft loss in multivariate analysis were peak of panel reactive antibodies (relative risk, 1.074; 95% confidence interval, 1.017-1.134; P=0.01) and acute rejection (relative risk, 16.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-147; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Early and late steroid withdrawal in low-immunologic-risk renal allografts treated with cyclosporine and MMF can be achieved without risk of acute rejection and with excellent long-term results.     

A Randomized Trial to Assess the Impact of Early Steroid Withdrawal on Growth in Pediatric Renal Transplantation: The TWIST Study

Minimizing steroid exposure in pediatric renal transplant recipients can improve linear growth and reduce metabolic disorders. This randomized multicenter study investigated the impact of early steroid withdrawal on mean change in height standard deviation score (SDS) and the safety and efficacy of two immunosuppressive regimens during the first 6 months after transplantation. Children received tacrolimus, MMF, two doses of daclizumab and steroids until day 4 (TAC/MMF/DAC, n = 98) or tacrolimus, MMF and standard‐dose steroids (TAC/MMF/STR, n = 98). Mean change in height SDS was 0.16 ± 0.32 with TAC/MMF/DAC and 0.03 ± 0.32 with TAC/MMF/STR. The mean treatment group difference was 0.13 (p < 0.005 [95% CI 0.04–0.22]), 0.21 in prepubertal (p = 0.009 [95% CI 0.05–0.36]) and 0.05 in pubertal children (p = ns). Frequency of biopsy‐proven acute rejection was 10.2%, TAC/MMF/DAC, and 7.1%, TAC/MMF/STR. Patient and graft survival and renal function were similar. Significantly greater reductions in total cholesterol and triglycerides but significantly higher incidences of infection and anemia were found with TAC/MMF/DAC (p < 0.05 all comparisons). Early steroid withdrawal significantly aided growth at 6 months more so in prepubertal than pubertal children. This was accompanied by significantly better lipid and glucose metabolism profiles without increases in graft rejection or loss.     

Recipient age and mycophenolate mofetil as the main determinants of outcome after steroid withdrawal: analysis of long-term follow-up in renal transplantation

The long-term benefit of steroid withdrawal on patient and graft survival is unproven. Steroids were stopped within the first year after kidney transplantation in 223 consecutive low-risk patients initially treated with thymoglobulin and triple-drug therapy. The 15-year actuarial graft survival rate was 83.9%. Risk factors for graft loss were: proteinuria (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.96, P = 0.0003), creatinine >130 micromol/L (HR: 3.37, P = 0.01), recipient age <35 years (HR: 5.31, P = 0.001), and no mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment (HR: 8.83, P = 0.04). Interestingly, recipient age and no MMF treatment were not risk factors in higher-risk patients in whom steroids were continued. The 2-year incidence of acute rejection following steroid withdrawal was 12.1%; the graft survival rate was lower in this group (71.1%). Our findings indicate that late steroid withdrawal results in excellent long-term outcome in most low-risk patients, but it should be attempted with caution in younger patients and when MMF is not used.     

Randomized trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in steroid withdrawal in living donor renal transplant recipients

The introduction of new immunosuppressants has prompted trials of steroid withdrawal. However, several groups have reported a higher incidence of rejection. We conducted a randomized two-arm, parallel-group, open-label, prospective study to compare steroid withdrawal (at 6 months posttransplant) from the regimens of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (FK group) versus cyclosporine + MMF (CSA group). The entry criteria were recipients of first living donor transplants with no diabetes mellitus (DM), congestive heart failure, chronic liver disease, or acute rejection within 6 months posttransplant. The primary endpoint was a biopsy-proven acute rejection episode or treatment failure within 1 year posttransplant. While 87 recipients were assigned to FK (n = 43) and CSA groups (n = 44) before transplantation, 76 recipients (FK 39, CSA 37) could be tapered off steroids at 6 months posttransplant, since 11 were excluded due to acute rejection within 6 months posttransplant (FK two, CSA three) or protocol violations (FK two, CSA four). After steroid withdrawal, the incidence of acute rejection episodes was 0% in the FK group and 13.5% in the CSA group (P < .05). Other results at 12 months posttransplantation were comparable: the incidences of DM 7.8% versus 0% (FK group vs CSA group), hypercholesterolemia 41.0% versus 59.5%, hypertensives 48.7% versus 59.6% as well as the levels of plasma creatinine 1.21 +/- 0.24 versus 1.31 +/- 0.50 mg/dL (P > .05 in every variable). These data suggest that steroid withdrawal is successful in first living donor renal transplant recipients. Tacrolimus may be significantly more effective than cyclosporine to prevent acute rejection after steroid withdrawal.     

Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal from Sirolimus-Based Therapy in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal has been used as a strategy to improve renal allograft function, however, it also carries risk of acute rejection. We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials that involved CNI withdrawal from a sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen. The search strategy yielded six trials (n = 1047 patients) reported in eight publications. CNI withdrawal from sirolimus-based therapy, was associated with an increased risk of acute rejection (risk difference, 6%; 95% CI 2-10%, p = 0.002) but a higher creatinine clearance (mean difference, 7.49 mL/min; 95% CI 5.08-9.89 mL/min, p < 0.00001) at 1 year compared to continued CNI and sirolimus therapy. Graft loss (relative risk, 0.87; 95% CI 0.46-1.64, p = 0.66) and death (relative risk, 0.88; CI 0.40-1.96, p = 0.76) were similar in both groups at 1 year. Hypertension was significantly reduced in the CNI withdrawal group (relative risk, 0.56; 95% CI 0.40-0.78, p = 0.0006). CNI withdrawal from sirolimus-based therapy is associated with an increased risk of acute rejection in the short term with a significant improvement in renal function and a reduction in hypertension. Longer follow-up is needed to determine if these changes will result in a significant improvement in patient and graft survival.     

Steroid withdrawal in living donor renal transplant recipients using tacrolimus and cyclosporine: a randomized prospective study.

Steroids have been a mainstay of immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation despite their adverse effects. The introduction of new immunosuppressant has improved the survival rates and prompted trials of steroid withdrawal. We conducted a randomized prospective study to compare steroid withdrawal at 6 months post-transplant between tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (FK group) versus cyclosporine A + MMF (CsA group). Steroid was withdrawn at 6 months post-transplant under the condition of no rejection episode proven by biopsy and maintenance of serum creatinine level <2.0 mg/dl. Fourteen recipients were excluded because of acute rejection within 6 months or protocol violation. Steroid could be tapered off in 62 in FK group and 55 in CsA. Three cases in FK group and five in CsA had acute rejection within another 6 months after steroid withdrawal (P > 0.05). At 12 months, the incidence of post-transplant diabetes was 18.6% vs. 8.0% in FK and CsA group. And hypercholesterolemia was presented in 8.5% vs. 2.0%, hypertension in 47.5% vs. 56.0%, and serum creatinine level 1.18 +/- 0.24 mg/dl vs. 1.18 +/- 0.20 mg/dl, respectively (P > 0.05). Steroid withdrawal may be carried out successfully using both FK and CsA with MMF, but long-term follow-up is necessary.     

Three-year observational follow-up of a multicenter, randomized trial on tacrolimus-based therapy with withdrawal of steroids or mycophenolate mofetil after renal transplant

BACKGROUND: The challenge in renal transplantation is to improve long-term patient and graft survival without increasing early acute rejection by minimizing immunosuppression. METHODS: This multicenter, observational study investigated the effects of withdrawal of steroids or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) from a tacrolimus-based triple regimen (tac/MMF/steroids) 3 months posttransplant at 3 years; no additional interventions or assessments were undertaken. Adult patients, included in the intent-to-treat population of the THOMAS study, participated. Patient and graft survival, adverse events, rejection episodes, and immunosuppressive and concomitant medications were assessed. RESULTS: Data at Year 3 was available for 718 patients (triple therapy, n=237; steroid stop, n=235; MMF stop, n=246). The original randomized regimen was maintained in 45.6% of patients in the triple, 62.6% in the steroid stop, and 53.9% in the MMF stop groups. Graft survival rates were 88.1% (triple), 86.4% (steroid stop), and 85.8% (MMF stop); patient survival was 96.1%, 95.9%, and 95.7%, respectively. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was similar in all groups between Month 7 and Year 3: 1.2% (triple), 2.0% (steroid stop) and 2.0% (MMF stop). Patients in the steroid stop group had less hypertension and significantly lower mean total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol at Year 3 compared with Month 3 (P=0.02). Median serum creatinine levels remained stable throughout the follow-up and were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Immunosuppression minimization initiated at Month 3 was maintained at Year 3 in over half of the patients. Steroid withdrawal was advantageous in reducing the cardiovascular risk factors hyperlipidemia, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Renal function was stable in all groups.     

Clinical Significance of Mycophenolate Mofetil Withdrawal in Kidney Transplant Recipients

IntroductionThe most effective immunosuppressant protocol in kidney transplantation (KT) is the combination of a calcineurin inhibitor, steroid, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) until now. However, MMF withdrawal (MW) is performed for many reasons, and the clinical course of the KT recipients after MW is not clearly known. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of KT after MW.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 626 KT recipients between 2000 and 2016. We evaluated the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft and patient survival rates, and risk factors related with graft failure.ResultsThe proportion of MW was 33.2% (208 of 626 patients). The median time between KT and MW was 6.4 months (range, 3.2–32.1 months). The common causes of MW were infection (70.7%), hematologic abnormalities (9.1%), and gastrointestinal trouble (7.7%). The incidence of BPAR was significantly higher in the MW group compared with the MMF continuation group (27.4% vs 8.9%, respectively, P < .001). Death-censored graft survival and patient survival rates were significantly lower in the MW group compared with the MMF continuation group (P < .001; P < .001, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, BPAR after MW was an independent risk factor for graft failure (hazard ratio 6.058, 95% confidence interval, 3.172–11.569, P < .001).ConclusionsThe incidence of rejection, graft failure, and patient mortality in KT were high after MW. Therefore, MW should be considered carefully.     

Immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors with respect to the outcome of HCV recurrence after liver transplantation: results of a meta-analysis.

A controversy exists over whether the outcome of a hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infection-related liver transplant differs based on the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) used. We have performed a systematic review and a subsequent meta-analysis evaluating tacrolimus (Tac)-based vs. cyclosporine A-based immunosuppression in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients. Searches were conducted to locate randomized controlled trials comparing Tac vs. cyclosporine A. Data on HCV liver transplant recipients were obtained, independently of whether the study was specifically designed for patients with this disease or not. A fixed effects model was used for statistical pooling of the relative risks (RR) for the different outcomes. A total of 5 articles (366 patients) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Statistically significant differences between Tac-based vs. cyclosporine A-based therapies were not found for mortality (P = 0.11; RR = 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-1.08), graft survival (P = 0.37; RR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.61-1.21), biopsy-proven acute rejection (P = 0.65; RR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.61-1.36), corticoresistant acute rejection (P = 0.26; RR = 2.25; 95% CI, 0.55-9.29), and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (P = 0.92; RR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.41-2.26). In 1 study, no differences were detected regarding severe fibrosis at 1 yr. In conclusion, patient and graft survivals in HCV-positive liver transplant patients are similar independently of the CNI selected as basic immunosuppressant. Unfortunately, data on the severity of recurrence and effect on viremia are scarce. Well-designed randomized prospective studies are needed to determine whether there are differences between the 2 CNIs regarding these specific variables.     

Steroid withdrawal at 3 months after kidney transplantation: a comparison of two tacrolimus-based regimens

The 6 month prospective, randomized study compared the steroid-sparing potential of two tacrolimus-based regimens after renal transplantation. A total of 489 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/steroids (n = 243; group Tac/MMF/S) or tacrolimus/azathioprine/steroids (n = 246; group Tac/Aza/S). At 3 months, steroids were tapered off in 267 (54.6%) patients free from steroid-resistant acute rejection and with serum creatinine concentrations <160 micromol/l. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at month 3 was lower in group Tac/MMF/S compared with group Tac/Aza/S (18.1% vs. 26.0%,P = 0.035). Moreover, more patients in the Tac/MMF/S group met the criteria for steroid withdrawal than in the Tac/Aza/S group (60.5% vs. 48.8%; P < 0.01). The incidence of acute rejection during months 4-6 was low in all groups, both for patients on steroid-free dual therapy (Tac/MMF: 2.7%, Tac/Aza: 0.8%) and for patients who continued steroid maintenance therapy (Tac/MMF/S: 3.5%, Tac/Aza/S: 7.1%). Moreover, kidney function was well preserved in steroid-free patients with month 6 median serum creatinine levels of 119.5 micromol/l (Tac/MMF), and 115.1 micromol/l (Tac/Aza). For patients who continued to receive steroids, month 6 median creatinine levels were 130.5 micromol/l (Tac/MMF/S) and 132.8 micromol/l (Tac/Aza/S). The criteria for the selection of patients to discontinue steroids were adequate. Both tacrolimus-based regimens allowed the safe discontinuation of steroids in low-risk patients at month 3. The Tac/MMF combination was superior in the prevention of acute rejections and more patients met the chosen criteria for steroid withdrawal.     

Cyclosporine withdrawal from a mycophenolate mofetil-containing immunosuppressive regimen: results of a five-year, prospective, randomized study

Maintenance immunosuppression with cyclosporine (CsA) is associated with nephrotoxicity, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. This long-term study (core study + 4 yr of follow-up) investigated the long-term efficacy and safety of CsA withdrawal from a mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based regimen. Seventy-seven patients were maintained on CsA, MMF, and steroids (CsA-MMF group), and 74 were given a CsA-free regimen of MMF and steroids (MMF group). Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance were measured at 6-month intervals. Patient and graft survival, acute rejection episodes, malignancies, BP, and lipid profile were also recorded. At 5 yr, patient and graft survival was 93 and 88%, respectively, for the MMF group and 95 and 92%, respectively, for the CsA-MMF group. During follow-up, seven MMF patients experienced acute rejection episodes compared with one CsA-MMF patient (P = 0.0283). Nine grafts were lost to chronic rejection in the MMF group versus three in the CsA-MMF group. No demographic or immunologic characteristics were associated with acute or chronic rejection in the MMF group, but the doses of both MMF and steroids decreased significantly between 1 and 5 yr. The MMF group showed a trend toward improved creatinine clearance (67.4 versus 61.7 ml/min; P = 0.0500). Withdrawal of CsA from an MMF-containing immunosuppressive regimen resulted in an increased risk for acute rejection episodes and graft loss as a result of rejection throughout the 5-yr study period. The creatinine clearance-confirmed improvement in renal function observed at year 1 was maintained at 5 yr BP and cholesterol levels were well controlled in both groups.     

Ten‐year observational follow‐up of a randomized trial comparing cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy combined with steroid withdrawal in living‐donor renal transplantation

Although various strategies for steroid withdrawal after transplantation have been attempted, there are few reports of the long‐term results of steroid withdrawal regimens in kidney transplantation. Earlier, we reported on a 5‐year prospective, randomized, single‐center trial comparing the safety and efficacy of cyclosporine (CsA) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with that of tacrolimus (TAC) plus MMF, when steroids were withdrawn 6 months after kidney transplantation in low‐risk patients. We now report the 10‐year observational data on the study population. We collected data from the database of the Organ Transplantation Center, Samsung Medical Center for 5 years after completion of the original study (TAC group n = 62; CsA group n = 55). The 10‐year patient survival, death‐censored graft survival, and acute rejection‐free survival did not differ between groups (98% vs 96%; P = 0.49, 78% vs 85%; P = 0.75 and 84% vs 76%; P = 0.14 in the TAC group vs CsA group, respectively). In low‐risk patients, there was no difference in long‐term patient and graft survival between TAC‐ and CsA‐based late steroid withdrawal regimens that included MMF treatment. More long‐term randomized clinical trials are needed to clarify the benefits of late steroid withdrawal in kidney transplantation.