Localization of mouse Rad51 and Lim15 proteins on meiotic chromosomes at late stages of prophase 1

Background: In meiosis, eukaryotic chromosomes show a series of morphological changes, during which chromosomes synapse and recombine. To understand the mechanisms of the morphological changes and recombination of chromosomes, we examined stage-specific localization of the Rad51 and Lim15 proteins on the chromosomes in meiotic prophase 1. These proteins are homologous with the RecA protein and have general properties of searching and pairing of homologous DNA sequences. We used mouse chromosomes whose small sizes allow us to identify the locations of these proteins on the entire structures of the chromosomes.
Results: In the leptotene and zygotene stages, the Rad51 protein was present on chromatin loops of mouse testis chromosomes then the protein left the loops. In the pachytene stage, the Rad51 protein was present almost exclusively along the core of the synaptonemal complexes (SC). When the stage proceeded to diplotene, the protein was present in the synaptic regions of chromosomes, in particular, in the chiasma regions. The protein was not present on separated homologous SC cores. On the other hand, the Lim15 protein that was found on chromatin loops in early prophase 1, was present almost exclusively at both ends of the SC cores throughout the late stages of prophase 1.
Conclusion: The Rad51 and Lim15 proteins are present in chromatin loops when chromosomes form SC. The proteins may promote pairing of homologous DNA sequences that would lead formation of SC. The Rad51 protein in the SC cores may be involved in chiasma formation in late stages. The Lim15 protein, instead, may be involved in recombination in the telomeric region or in cohesion of sister chromatids for segregation.     

Cohesion by topology: sister chromatids interlocked by DNA

Sister chromatid cohesion is coupled with chromosome replication and influences chromosome segregation and intra-S repair. Specialized proteins, the cohesins, together with other pathways contribute to tether sister chromatids. In this issue of Genes & Development, Wang and colleagues (pp. 2426-2433 demonstrate that TopoIV, a type II DNA topoisomerase, modulates cohesion in Escherichia coli, by removing interlocked DNA junctions between sister chromatids. They propose that DNA precatenanes, arising during replication fork progression, hold sister chromatids together.     

The telochore: A telomeric differentiation of the chromosome axis

We have analysed by means of silver staining the structure of the chromosome axis at the telomeres of meiotic chromosomes in three different grasshopper species. At metaphase I the chromatid axes run the length of the chromatids although they do not reach the chromosome ends. The axes of sister chromatids are associated and show a round differentiation at their distal ends that we have named the telochore. Telochores never contact the chromosome ends: there is always some chromatin beyond them. In late metaphase I bivalents with a distal chiasma, anaphase I and metaphase II half-bivalents and anaphase II chromatids, the axes clearly possess one telochore in each chromosome end. These results seem to indicate that telochores are differentiations of the distal ends of chromatids. We discuss the possible structural significance of telochores according to the current scaffold/radial loop model of chromatin organization of eukaryotic metaphase chromosomes. Additionally, we suggest the possible functional role of the telochore as a nucleoprotein domain forming a protective cap for telomeric DNA.     

Cohesion proteins are present in centromere protein bodies associated with avian lampbrush chromosomes

Proteins of sister chromatid cohesion are important for maintenance of meiotic chromosome structure and retention of homologous chromosomes in bivalents during diplotene. Localization of the cohesion proteins within nuclei of growing oocytes merits special attention, particularly in avian oocytes, in which diplotene chromosomes assume the form of lampbrush chromosomes (LBCs). We performed indirect immunostaining using antibodies against cohesins SMC1α, SMC1β, SMC3, Rad21, and the SA/STAG family on chaffinch, pigeon and duck LBCs spreads, and frozen ovary sections. On LBCs spreads, antibodies to the majority of cohesins showed punctate staining on chromosome axes. LBC lateral loops, where sister chromatids are separated, did not show cohesin components. The spherical entities attached to the LBCs centromeres in avian germinal vesicles, the so-called protein bodies (PBs), were enriched in SMC1α, SMC3, Rad21, STAG1 and STAG2. The synaptonemal complex component SYCP3, which also participates in cohesion, was detected in the axes of avian lampbrush bivalents and, to a greater degree, in the PBs. In vitellogenic oocytes, cohesion proteins persist in the PBs associated with condensing bivalents when they concentrate into the karyosphere. These results indicate that cohesion proteins accumulate in centromere PBs in avian oocytes and are involved into structural maintenance of lampbrush chromosome axes.     

Melosis in holocentric chromosomes: Kinetic activity is randomly restricted to the chromatid ends of sex univalents inGraphosoma italicum (Heteroptera)

We have determined the number and location of the nucleolar organizing regions in spermatocytes ofGraphosoma italicum (2n=12A+ XY/XX) by means of silver impregnation, chromomycin A₃/distamycin A staining and fluorescencein situ hybridization. The identification of only one nucleolar organizing region located at one of the X chromosome ends has provided a suitable cytological marker to analyse the segregation of this univalent and that of the XY pseudobivalent during the first and second meiotic divisions respectively. Our results clearly show that at first meiotic metaphase the chromatids of the X chromosome are orientated with their long axes perpendicular to the polar axis. Although the kinetic activity is restricted to only one end in both X chromatids during the first meiotic division, both ends of the same chromatid have the same probability of showing such kinetic activity. In this sense, we also report that the chromatid segregation maybe initiated either at the same sister chromatid ends or at opposite ends in each chromatid. Thus, this indicates a sex chromatid independence as regards to the chromatid segregation during the first meiotic division. Throughout the second meiotic division both ends of the X chromatid are involved with the same probability in the end-to-end association to conform the XY pseudobivalent. This also implies a random localization of the kinetic activity at the ends opposite to those involved in the end-to-end association.accepted for publication by J. S. (Pat) Heslop-Harrison     

Cohesin component dynamics during meiotic prophase I in mammalian oocytes

Cohesins are chromosomal proteins that form complexes involved in the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion during division of somatic and germ cells. Three meiosis-specific cohesin subunits have been reported in mammals, REC8, STAG3 and SMC1 beta; their expression in mouse spermatocytes has also been described. Here we studied the localization of different meiotic and mitotic cohesin components during prophase I in human and murine female germ cells. In normal and atretic human fetal oocytes, from leptotene to diplotene stages, REC8 and STAG3 colocalize in fibers. In murine oocytes, SMC1beta, SMC3 and STAG3 are localized along fibers that correspond first to the chromosome axis and then to the synaptonemal complex in pachytene. Mitotic cohesin subunit RAD21 is also found in fibers that decorate the SC during prophase I in mouse oocytes, suggesting a role for this cohesin in mammalian sister chromatid cohesion in female meiosis. We observed that, unlike human oocytes, murine synaptonemal complex protein SYCP3 localizes to nucleoli throughout prophase I stages, and centromeres cluster in discrete locations from leptotene to dictyate. At difference from meiosis in male mice, the cohesin axis is progressively lost during the first week after birth in females with a parallel destruction of the axial elements at dictyate arrest, demonstrating sexual dimorphism in sister chromatid cohesion in meiosis.     

Cohesin release is required for sister chromatid resolution,but not for condensin-mediated compaction,at the onset of mitosis

The establishment of metaphase chromosomes is an essential prerequisite of sister chromatid separation in anaphase. It involves the coordinated action of cohesin and condensin, protein complexes that mediate cohesion and condensation, respectively. In metazoans, most cohesin dissociates from chromatin at prophase, coincident with association of condensin. Whether loosening of cohesion at the onset of mitosis facilitates the compaction process, resolution of the sister chromatids, or both, remains unknown. We have found that the prophase release of cohesin is completely blocked when two mitotic kinases, aurora B and polo-like kinase (Plx1), are simultaneously depleted from Xenopus egg extracts. Condensin loading onto chromatin is not affected under this condition, and rod-shaped chromosomes are produced that show an apparently normal level of compaction. However, the resolution of sister chromatids within these chromosomes is severely compromised. This is not because of inhibition of topoisomerase II activity that is also required for the resolution process. We propose that aurora B and Plx1 cooperate to destabilize the sister chromatid linkage through distinct mechanisms that may involve phosphorylation of histone H3 and cohesin, respectively. More importantly, our results strongly suggest that cohesin release at the onset of mitosis is essential for sister chromatid resolution but not for condensin-mediated compaction.     

Meiosis in Holocentric Chromosomes: Orientation and Segregation of an Autosome and Sex Chromosomes in Triatoma infestans (Heteroptera)

The meiotic behaviour of the X chromosome and one autosomal pair of the heteropteran Triatoma infestans was analysed by means of C-banding plus DAPI staining. At first metaphase, the X univalent is oriented with its long axis parallel to the equatorial plate, which suggests a holocentric interaction with the spindle fibres. After this initial orientation, kinetic activity is restricted to one of both chromatid ends. The election of the active chromatid end is random and it is independent of the end selected in the sister chromatid. At second metaphase, the X and Y chromatids associate side by side forming a pseudobivalent. After that, the kinetic activity is again restricted to either of both chromosomal ends in a random fashion. At first metaphase, the fourth autosomal bivalent shows two alternative random orientations depending on the chromosome end showing kinetic activity (DAPI positive or opposite). At second metaphase, half bivalents are oriented with their long axis parallel to the equatorial plate. Three different segregation patterns are observed. The kinetic activity can be localised: (i) in the end with the DAPI signal (46.9%), (ii) in the opposite end (44.6%) or (iii) in one DAPI-positive end in one chromatid and in the opposite end in the other one (8.5%). The existence of the last pattern indicates that the same end can show kinetic activity during both meiotic divisions. Our results provide new information on the comparative meiotic behaviour of autosomes and sex chromosomes in holocentric systems.     

Sororin is enriched at the central region of synapsed meiotic chromosomes

During meiotic prophase, cohesin complexes mediate cohesion between sister chromatids and promote pairing and synapsis of homologous chromosomes. Precisely how the activity of cohesin is controlled to promote these events is not fully understood. In metazoans, cohesion establishment between sister chromatids during mitotic divisions is accompanied by recruitment of the cohesion-stabilizing protein Sororin. During somatic cell division cycles, Sororin is recruited in response to DNA replication-dependent modification of the cohesin complex by ESCO acetyltransferases. How Sororin is recruited and acts in meiosis is less clear. Here, we have surveyed the chromosomal localization of Sororin and its relationship to the meiotic cohesins and other chromatin modifiers with the objective of determining how Sororin contributes to meiotic chromosome dynamics. We show that Sororin localizes to the cores of meiotic chromosomes in a manner that is dependent on synapsis and the synaptonemal complex protein SYCP1. In contrast, cohesin, with which Sororin interacts in mitotic cells, shows axial enrichment on meiotic chromosomes even in the absence of synapsis between homologs. Using high-resolution microscopy, we show that Sororin is localized to the central region of the synaptonemal complex. These results indicate that Sororin regulation during meiosis is distinct from its regulation in mitotic cells and may suggest that it interacts with a distinctly different partner to ensure proper chromosome dynamics in meiosis.     

The distribution of α-kleisin during meiosis in the holocentromeric plant <Emphasis Type="Italic">Luzula elegans</Emphasis>

Holocentric chromosomes occur in a number of independent eukaryotic lineages, and they form holokinetic kinetochores along the entire poleward chromatid surfaces. Due to this alternative chromosome structure, Luzula elegans sister chromatids segregate already in anaphase I followed by the segregation of the homologues in anaphase II. However, not yet known is the localization and dynamics of cohesin and the structure of the synaptonemal complex (SC) during meiosis. We show here that the α-kleisin subunit of cohesin localizes at the centromeres of both mitotic and meiotic metaphase chromosomes and that it, thus, may contribute to assemble the centromere in L. elegans. This localization and the formation of a tripartite SC structure indicate that the prophase I behaviour of L. elegans is similar as in monocentric species.     

Releasing cohesin from chromosome arms in early mitosis: opposing actions of Wapl–Pds5 and Sgo1

The cohesin complex establishes sister chromatid cohesion during S phase. In metazoan cells, most if not all cohesin dissociates from chromatin during mitotic prophase, leading to the formation of metaphase chromosomes with two cytologically discernible chromatids. This process, known as sister chromatid resolution, is believed to be a prerequisite for synchronous separation of sister chromatids in subsequent anaphase. To dissect this process at a mechanistic level, we set up an in vitro system. Sister chromatid resolution is severely impaired upon depletion of Wapl from Xenopus egg extracts. Exogenously added human Wapl can rescue these defects and, remarkably, it can do so in a very short time window of early mitosis. A similar set of observations is made for Pds5, a factor implicated previously in the stabilization of interphase cohesion. Characteristic amino acid motifs (the FGF motifs) in Wapl coordinate its physical and functional interactions with Pds5 and cohesin subunits. We propose that Wapl and Pds5 directly modulate conformational changes of cohesin to make it competent for dissociation from chromatin during prophase. Evidence is also presented that Sgo1 plays a hitherto underappreciated role in stabilizing cohesin along chromosome arms, which is antagonized by the mitotic kinases polo-like kinsase (Plk1) and aurora B.     

Unbiased segregation of fission yeast chromosome 2 strands to daughter cells

The base complementarity feature (Watson and Crick in Nature 171(4356):737–738, 1953) and the rule of semi-conservative mode of DNA replication (Messelson and Stahl in Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 44:671–682, 1958) dictate that two identical replicas of the parental chromosome are produced during replication. In principle, the inherent strand sequence differences could generate nonequivalent daughter chromosome replicas if one of the two strands were epigenetically imprinted during replication to effect silencing/expression of developmentally important genes. Indeed, inheritance of such a strand- and site-specific imprint confers developmental asymmetry to fission yeast sister cells by a phenomenon called mating/cell-type switching. Curiously, location of DNA strands with respect to each other at the centromere is fixed, and as a result, their selected segregation to specific sister chromatid copies occurs in eukaryotic cells. The yeast system provides a unique opportunity to determine the significance of such biased strand distribution to sister chromatids. We determined whether the cylindrical-shaped yeast cell distributes the specific chromosomal strand to the same cellular pole in successive cycles of cell division. By observing the pattern of recurrent mating-type switching in progenies of individual cells by microscopic analyses, we found that chromosome 2 strands are distributed by the random mode in successive cell divisions. We also exploited unusual “hotspot” recombination features of this system to investigate whether there is selective segregation of strands such that oldest Watson-containing strands co-segregate in the diploid cell at mitosis. Our data suggests that chromosome 2 strands are segregated independently to those of the homologous chromosome.     

Sister acts: coordinating DNA replication and cohesion establishment

The ring-shaped cohesin complex links sister chromatids and plays crucial roles in homologous recombination and mitotic chromosome segregation. In cycling cells, cohesin's ability to generate cohesive linkages is restricted to S phase and depends on loading and establishment factors that are intimately connected to DNA replication. Here we review how cohesin is regulated by the replication machinery, as well as recent evidence that cohesin itself influences how chromosomes are replicated.     

Cohesin proteins load sequentially during prophase I in tomato primary microsporocytes

Proteins of the cohesin complex are essential for sister chromatid cohesion and proper chromosome segregation during both mitosis and meiosis. Cohesin proteins are also components of axial elements/lateral elements (AE/LEs) of synaptonemal complexes (SCs) during meiosis, and cohesins are thought to play an important role in meiotic chromosome morphogenesis and recombination. Here, we have examined the cytological behavior of four cohesin proteins (SMC1, SMC3, SCC3, and REC8/SYN1) during early prophase I in tomato microsporocytes using immunolabeling. All four cohesins are discontinuously distributed along the length of AE/LEs from leptotene through early diplotene. Based on current models for the cohesin complex, the four cohesin proteins should be present at the same time and place in equivalent amounts. However, we observed that cohesins often do not colocalize at the same AE/LE positions, and cohesins differ in when they load onto and dissociate from AE/LEs of early prophase I chromosomes. Cohesin labeling of LEs from pachytene nuclei is similar through euchromatin, pericentric heterochromatin, and kinetochores but is distinctly reduced through the nucleolar organizer region of chromosome 2. These results indicate that the four cohesin proteins may form different complexes and/or perform additional functions during meiosis in plants, which are distinct from their essential function in sister chromatid cohesion.     

Localization of human SMC1 protein at kinetochores

Proper cohesion of sister chromatids is prerequisite for correct segregation of chromosomes during cell division. The cohesin multiprotein complex, conserved in eukaryotes, is required for sister chromatid cohesion. Human cohesin is composed of a stable heterodimer of the structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family proteins, hSMC1 and hSMC3, and non-SMC components, hRAD21 and SA1 (or SA2). In yeast, cohesin associates with chromosomes from late G1 to metaphase and is required for the establishment and maintenance of both chromosome arm and centromeric cohesion. However, in human cells, the majority of cohesin dissociates from chromosomes before mitosis. Although it was recently shown that a small amount of hRAD21 localizes to the centromeres during metaphase, the presence of other cohesin components at the centromere has not been demonstrated in human cells. Here we report the mitosis-specific localization of hSMC1 to the kinetochores. hSMC1 is targeted to the kinetochore region during prophase concomitant with kinetochore assembly and remains through anaphase. Importantly, hSMC1 is targeted only to the active centromere on dicentric chromosomes. These results suggest that hSMC1 is an integral component of the functional kinetochore structure during mitosis. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Nonrandom sister chromatid segregation of sex chromosomes in Drosophila male germline stem cells

Sister chromatids are the product of DNA replication, which is assumed to be a very precise process. Therefore, sister chromatids should be exact copies of each other. However, reports have indicated that sister chromatids are segregated nonrandomly during cell division, suggesting that sister chromatids are not the same, although their DNA sequences are the same. Researchers have speculated that stem cells may retain template strands to avoid replication-induced mutations. An alternative proposal is that cells may segregate distinct epigenetic information carried on sister chromatids. Recently, we found that Drosophila male germline stem cells segregate sister chromatids of X and Y chromosomes with a strong bias. We discuss this finding in relation to existing models for nonrandom sister chromatid segregation.     

Atomic force microscopy of human metaphase chromosomes after differential staining of sister chromatids

Human metaphase chromosomes, in which 5-bromo-deoxyuridine (BrdU) had been incorporated into the DNA, were treated with the fluorescent plus Giemsa (FPG) method. Use of this method distinctly stained one of the paired sister chromatids with the Giemsa solution due to the difference in content of BrdU in the two chromatids. These chromosomes with their differential staining of sister chromatids were observed by atomic force microscopy (AFM). In the air-dried specimens, one of the paired chromatids that was stained strongly with Giemsa solution was about two times higher than the counterpart that was stained faintly with Giemsa solution. In the critical point dried chromosomes, the height of the Giemsa positive chromatid roughly matched that of the Giemsa negative counterpart. These findings imply that the arrangement of the Giemsa negative chromatid after FPG staining is fragile and easily collapses due to the surface tension of water during air-drying. At higher magnifications, the surface structure differed between Giemsa positive and negative chromatids; the Giemsa positive chromatid (i.e., unifilarly BrdU-incorporated chromatid) was composed of fibrous structures while the Giemsa negative chromatid (i.e., bifilarly BrdU-incorporated chromatid) exhibited a fine granular appearance. These structural changes in the sister chromatids are thought to arise from the ultraviolet irradiation and heating of the chromosomes during FPG staining.     

A CO-FISH assay to assess sister chromatid segregation patterns in mitosis of mouse embryonic stem cells

Sister chromatids contain identical DNA sequence but are chiral with respect to both their helical handedness and their replication history. Emerging evidence from various model organisms suggests that certain stem cells segregate sister chromatids nonrandomly to either maintain genome integrity or to bias cellular differentiation in asymmetric cell divisions. Conventional methods for tracing of old vs. newly synthesized DNA strands generally lack resolution for individual chromosomes and employ halogenated thymidine analogs with profound cytotoxic effects on rapidly dividing cells. Here, we present a modified chromosome orientation fluorescence in situ hybridization (CO-FISH) assay, where identification of individual chromosomes and their replication history is achieved in subsequent hybridization steps with chromosome-specific DNA probes and PNA telomere probes. Importantly, we tackle the issue of BrdU cytotoxicity and show that our method is compatible with normal mouse ES cell biology, unlike a recently published related protocol. Results from our CO-FISH assay show that mitotic segregation of mouse chromosome 7 is random in ES cells, which contrasts previously published results from our laboratory and settles a controversy. Our straightforward protocol represents a useful resource for future studies on chromatid segregation patterns of in vitro-cultured cells from distinct model organisms.     

Atomic force microscopy for imaging human metaphase chromosomes

The present study introduces the principle of atomic force microscopy (AFM) and reviews our results of human metaphase chromosomes obtained by AFM. AFM imaging of the chromosomes revealed that the chromatid arm was not uniform in structure but had ridges and grooves along its length, which was most prominent in the late metaphase. The arrangement of these ridges and grooves was roughly symmetrical with the counterpart of the paired sister chromatids. AFM imaging of banded chromosomes also showed that the ridges and grooves were related to the G/Q-positive and G/Q-negative bands, respectively. At high magnification, the chromatid was seen to be produced by the compaction of highly twisted chromatin fiber loops, and its compaction tended to be stronger in the ridged regions of the chromosomes than in the grooved regions. Our AFM studies also showed the presence of catenation of chromatin fibers between the ridged portions of the chromatid in the late metaphase. Thus, AFM is useful for obtaining the three-dimensional surface topography not only in ambient conditions but also in physiological liquid conditions, and is expected to be an attractive tool for investigating the structure of chromosomes.