Hepatic metastases from breast carcinoma: comparison of noncontrast, arterial-dominant, and portal-dominant phase spiral CT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to determine the relative value of noncontrast (NC), arterial-dominant (AD), and portal-dominant (PD) phase images in spiral CT of the liver for breast cancer metastases. METHOD: Forty-four spiral CT scans in 18 patients with hepatic metastases from breast cancer were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists. Subjective evaluations of overall lesion conspicuity and margination were graded on a 5 point scale for NC, AD, and PD phase images, and the three phases were also ranked for demonstration of overall tumor volume. Those scans with hypervascular lesions were separately analyzed, resulting in three groups (all, hypervascular, hypovascular). RESULTS: For lesion conspicuity and margination for the entire study group, AD phase images showed the lowest grades (1.97 and 1.83), whereas the PD phase showed the highest grade (3.34 and 3.14; p < 0.0001) followed by NC (2.36 and 2.42; p < 0.0001). For the hypervascular subgroup, the AD phase also showed the lowest grades (2.39 and 2.24). In no case did the AD phase show more lesions than the combination of NC and PD phases. For depiction of overall tumor volume, the AD phase had the lowest ranking (2.51) compared with the NC and PD phases (1.71 and 1.78; p < 0.001). For the hypervascular subgroup, the AD phase had the lowest ranking (2.33) compared with the NC and PD phases (1.39 and 2.27; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The AD phase is not required for lesion detection in spiral CT for hepatic metastases from breast carcinoma. The NC phase depicts the maximal tumor volume.     

Dual phase helical CT versus portal venous phase CT for the detection of colorectal liver metastases: correlation with intra-operative sonography, surgical and pathological findings

AIM: To assess whether dual phase helical computed tomography (DPCT) of the liver improves the detection of colorectal liver metastases compared with portal venous phase (PVP) imaging alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DPCT was performed in 33 consecutive patients before laparotomy for resection of colorectal liver metastases. CT comprised 8-mm slice collimation with a pitch of 1 to 1.25; imaging was commenced 20-25 and 65-70 s after the start of injection of 150 ml of contrast medium at 5 ml/s to coincide with hepatic arterial phase (HAP) and PVP contrast enhancement, respectively. Four blinded observers independently reviewed the HAP, PVP and DPCT images recording the site and size of all lesions. Alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic (AFROC) methodology was used to analyse the results, which were correlated with surgery, intra-operative ultrasound and histology. RESULTS: The mean observer sensitivities for malignant lesion detection were 75.3% for DPCT, 69.7% for PVP imaging and 66.7% for HAP imaging alone. There was a statistically significant improvement in malignant lesion detection using DPCT when compared with PVP imaging alone (P < 0.05). The mean areas under the AFROC curves were 0.84 for DPCT and 0.82 for PVP (P < 0.03) imaging alone. CONCLUSION: The detection of colorectal liver metastases was marginally better with DPCT than with PVP imaging alone, but the discovery of additional lesions did not affect the management of any of the patients in this study.     

Hepatic arterial and portal venous phase helical CT in patients treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: added value of unenhanced images

PURPOSE: To evaluate the additional diagnostic value of unenhanced computed tomographic (CT) images in the depiction of viable tumor in patients who were treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and followed up with biphasic helical CT that included the acquisition of unenhanced images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed helical CT (with unenhanced, arterial, and portal phases) in 54 patients who had been treated with TACE for HCC. Image analysis was first performed with only those images obtained in the arterial and portal venous phases of helical CT. A second analysis was then performed with unenhanced images, arterial images, and portal venous images that focused on the additional value of unenhanced images. The value of additional unenhanced images was evaluated by means of interobserver agreement (kappa statistic) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: The two readers detected 128 and 129 lesions. Unenhanced images were valuable for 32 of 129 lesions (23 patients) for reader 1 and for 29 of 128 lesions (21 patients) for reader 2. Although there was no significant difference between biphasic CT alone and biphasic CT with unenhanced images, results of ROC analysis showed higher diagnostic performance with biphasic CT with unenhanced images than with biphasic CT alone for detecting viable tumor. CONCLUSION: The study data demonstrate the diagnostic value of unenhanced images interpreted in conjunction with biphasic CT images for follow-up of patients who have previously been treated with TACE for HCC.     

Comparison of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced spiral CT for assessing interval change in patients with colorectal liver metastases

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the interval change in hepatic colorectal metastases as assessed with serial computed tomographic (CT) scans without contrast material enhancement differs from that as assessed using serial, portal dominant phase, contrast-enhanced CT scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans were obtained in 28 patients. Three radiologists separately reviewed serial unenhanced and contrast-enhanced studies to assess the interval change in liver metastases. These radiologists recorded total number of lesions, bidimensional measurements of the largest lesions (as many as three), and overall impressions regarding the interval change (none, worse, or better). RESULTS: Among the 84 judgments (28 patients x 3 radiologists), comparisons of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT studies were concordant in 60 assessments (71%). Nineteen (23%) showed mild disagreement. Of these, contrast-enhanced CT studies demonstrated disease stability when unenhanced CT studies demonstrated otherwise in 11 judgments, whereas unenhanced CT studies demonstrated stability when contrast-enhanced CT studies demonstrated otherwise in eight assessments. Furthermore, of the five marked disagreements, two resulted from a conclusion of interval improvement on unenhanced CT studies and a conclusion of interval worsening on contrast-enhanced CT studies, whereas three demonstrated the opposite. Neither set of serial CT studies systematically resulted in under- or overestimation of disease progression (McNemar Q test, P < .25). CONCLUSION: The authors found no consistent pattern to demonstrate that serial unenhanced or contrast-enhanced CT studies resulted in over- or underestimation of disease progression.     

Hepatocellular carcinoma: role of unenhanced and delayed phase multi-detector row helical CT in patients with cirrhosis

PURPOSE: To determine, by using multi-detector row helical computed tomography (CT), the added value of obtaining unenhanced and delayed phase scans in addition to biphasic (hepatic arterial and portal venous phases) scans in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Local ethical committee approval and patient consent were obtained. One hundred ninety-five patients (129 men, 66 women; mean age, 61 years; age range, 39-78 years) with 250 HCCs underwent multi-detector row helical CT of the liver. A quadruple-phase protocol that included unenhanced, hepatic arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases was performed. Analysis of images from hepatic arterial and portal venous phases combined, hepatic arterial and portal venous phases with the unenhanced phase, hepatic arterial and portal venous phases with the delayed phase, and all phases combined was performed separately by three independent radiologists. Relative sensitivity, positive predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(z)) were calculated for each reading session. RESULTS: Mean sensitivity and positive predictive values, respectively, for HCC detection were 88.8% (666 of 750 readings) and 97.8% (666 of 681 readings) for the combined hepatic arterial and portal venous phases, 89.2% (669 of 750 readings) and 97.8% (669 of 684 readings) for hepatic arterial and portal venous phases with the unenhanced phase, 92.8% (696 of 750 readings) and 97.3% (696 of 715 readings) for hepatic arterial and portal venous phases with the delayed phase, and 92.8% (696 of 750 readings) and 97.3% (696 of 715 readings) for all four phases combined. The reading sessions in which delayed phase images were available for interpretation showed significantly (P < .05) superior sensitivity and A(z) values. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced phase images are not effective for HCC detection. Because of the significant increase in HCC detection, a delayed phase can be a useful adjunct to biphasic CT in patients at risk for developing HCC.     

Multiphase contrast-enhanced helical CT of liver metastases from renal cell carcinoma

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) multiphase liver studies would improve detection of metastatic liver disease. Forty-six consecutive patients with known metastatic RCC underwent standardized non-contrast and triphasic contrast enhanced hepatic CT examinations as part of their routine imaging studies. Once a liver abnormality was detected, it was characterized as metastatic by a panel of three radiologists who followed pre-set criteria. These criteria included change in size, biopsy results and lack of benign features. Presence and conspicuity of liver metastases were graded using a five-point scale by consensus of a panel of three radiologists. The highest number of lesions evaluated per patient was limited to ten. Seventy-two liver metastases were detected in 16 patients. Of these, 54 were seen on unenhanced scans; 47 in the hepatic arterial (HA) phase, at 25 s; 65 in the portal-venous (PV) phase, at 60 s; and 49 in delayed images, at 90 s. Scanning only during the PV phase would have missed seven lesions (10%), six of which were seen on unenhanced images and six were seen in HA phase. All patients with metastatic liver disease would have been identified by combination of unenhanced and PV phase or by HA and PV phase scanning. Forty-two lesions were graded more conspicuous on the PV phase, whereas 18 (25%) were more conspicuous on the HA phase. The combination of unenhanced, HA and PV scanning should be considered in the initial evaluation of patients with metastatic RCC for improved lesion detection and characterization. Subsequently, the combination of unenhanced and PV phase imaging is preferred.     

原发性肝癌多层面CT双动脉期与门静脉期增强扫描分析

目的：探讨原发性肝癌多层面CT（multi-slices CT,MSCT）双动脉期与门静脉期增强扫描各期强化特征及癌灶的检出率。方法：104例原发性肝癌治疗前行MSCT的平扫与三期扫描（双动脉期与门静脉期扫描）,对比剂用量100 ml,以3 ml/s的速率肘静脉注射,采集时间动脉早期20～22 s,动脉晚期34～37 s,门静脉期60 s。测病灶平扫及各增强期CT值,分析病灶的强化情况及检出情况,以增强各期检出的肿瘤数目为肿瘤灶总数。结果：三期增强扫描共显示470个病灶,34个均匀强化;436个不均匀强化,〈3 cm病灶动脉早期检出117个（56.25%）,动脉晚期检出171个（82.21%）,门静脉期检出137个（65.86%）,≥3 cm的病灶动脉早期检出237个（90.45%）,动脉晚期检出250个（95.41%）,门静脉期检出244个（93.12%）。56个仅在三期增强扫描的一期显示,动脉早期5个,动脉晚期25个,门静脉期26个。结论：动脉晚期的检出率明显高于门静脉期与动脉早期。双动脉期与门静脉期增强扫描有利于提高肝癌检出效率。     

Dysplastic nodules in liver cirrhosis: detection with triple phase helical dynamic CT

The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity of triple phase helical dynamic CT for detecting dysplastic nodules in patients with liver cirrhosis. 76 dysplastic nodules were confirmed by histopathological examination of the liver specimens after surgical resection in 21 patients or after explantation of the whole liver in 20 patients. Triple phase helical dynamic CT including arterial, portal venous and delayed phases was performed as a pre-operative evaluation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Two readers retrospectively evaluated the images. The presence of dysplastic nodules was determined by one-to-one correlation of the CT images and the pathological results in terms of the anatomical location and size of each nodule. Helical dynamic triple phase CT depicted eight of 76 dysplastic nodules (10%): five of 35 high grade dysplastic nodules (14%) and three of 41 low grade dysplastic nodules (7%). Triple phase helical dynamic CT is insensitive for detection of dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic livers.     

Comparison of gadolinium-EOB-DTPA-enhanced and diffusion-weighted liver MRI for detection of small hepatic metastases

Objective

To compare the accuracy of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI with that of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the detection of small hepatic metastases (2 cm or smaller).

Methods

Forty-five patients underwent abdominal MRI at 3 T, including T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), heavily T2WI (HASTE), DWI with a b-value of 500 s/mm² and contrast-enhanced MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA. Two groups were assigned and compared: group A (T1WI, T2WI, HASTE and contrast-enhanced study with Gd-EOB-DTPA), and group B (T1WI, T2WI, HASTE and DWI). Two observers independently interpreted the images obtained in a random order. For all hepatic metastases, the diagnostic performance using each imaging set was evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

A total of 51 hepatic metastases were confirmed. The area under the ROC curve (Az) of group A was larger than that of group B, and the difference in the mean Az values between the two image sets was statistically significant, whereas, there were three metastases that lay near thin vessels or among multiple cysts and were better visualised in group B than in group A.

Conclusion

Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI showed higher accuracy in the detection of small metastases than DWI.     

比较Gd-EOB-DTPA增强MRI与扩散加权成像对肝内小转移灶的检出

目的比较Gd-EOB-DTPA增强MRI与扩散加权成像(DWI)检出肝内小转移灶(2cm或更小)的准确性。方法 45例病人行腹部3TMRI检查,所用序列包括T1加权     

Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with double arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT

PURPOSE: To assess whether double arterial phase imaging with multi-detector row helical computed tomography improves detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients with 96 hypervascular HCCs underwent double arterial phase imaging of the entire liver. At measured delay after intravenous administration of 2 mL/kg of contrast medium at a rate of 5 mL/sec, the early and late arterial phase images were obtained serially during a single breath hold with interscan delay of 5.0 seconds. Detector row configuration of 2.5 x 4 mm, pitch of 6, and scanning time of 10.5 seconds for each phase were used. Forty 5-mm-thick reconstruction images were obtained for each phase. Each image set was interpreted separately by three observers, who were unaware of tumor burden in the liver, to detect hypervascular HCC. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and area below the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(z)) for early and late arterial phases separately and together were calculated. RESULTS: Mean sensitivity and positive predictive value for hypervascular HCC were 54% and 85% for the early arterial phase, 78% and 83% for the late arterial phase, and 86% and 92% for the double arterial phase, respectively. Double arterial phase imaging showed significantly superior sensitivity compared with early or late arterial phase imaging alone for detecting HCC (P <.05). The mean A(z) value for double arterial phase was significantly higher than that for early or late arterial phase imaging alone (P <.05). Double arterial phase imaging showed the lowest number of false-positive lesions. CONCLUSION: Double arterial phase imaging is recommended to improve detection of hypervascular HCCs and reduce false-positive lesions.     

Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma by Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI: Comparison with triple phase 64 detector row helical CT

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic performance of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI with that of triple phase 64-MDCT in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Patients and methods

Thirty-four patients with 52 surgically proven lesions underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and triple phase 64-MDCT. Two observers independently evaluated MR and CT imaging on a lesion-by-lesion basis. Sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values and reproducibility were evaluated. The diagnostic accuracy of each modality was assessed with alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results

Both observers showed higher sensitivity in detecting lesions with MRI compared to CT, however, only the difference between the two imaging techniques for observer 2 was significant (P = 0.034). For lesions 1 cm or smaller, MRI and CT showed equal sensitivity (both 62.5%) with one observer, and MRI proved superior to CT with the other observer (MRI 75% vs. CT 56.3%), but the latter difference was not significant (P = 0.083). The difference in positive and negative predictive value between the two imaging techniques for each observer was not significant (P > 0.05). The areas under the ROC curve for each observer were 0.843 and 0.861 for MRI vs. 0.800 and 0.833 for CT and the differences were not significant. Reproducibility was higher using MRI for both observers, but the result was not significant (MRI 32/33 vs. CT 29/33, P = 0.083).

Conclusion

Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI tended to show higher diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and reproducibility compared to triple phase 64-MDCT in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma, however statistical significance was not achieved.     

螺旋CT肝双期扫描在外生性肝癌诊断中的临床应用

目的：探讨螺旋CT肝双期扫描对外生性肝癌的诊断价值。方法：回顾性分析了7例外生性肝癌螺旋CT肝双期扫描的CT表现。结果：7例外生性肝癌与肝脏相连，3例有明显蒂部，2例肝右叶外生性肝癌向下至右侧盆腔内，6例其内可见CT“密度更低区”，3例压迫胃体及胃窦。螺旋CT肝动脉期6例肿瘤内可见不规则纡曲强化血管影。5例门静脉期肿瘤呈低密度；2例门静脉期部分肿瘤组织强化，密度增高。结论：螺旋CT肝双期扫描对外生性肝癌诊断有较高的临床价值。     

多层螺旋CT肝脏多期扫描对肝细胞癌检出的初步评价

目的　应用多层螺旋CT(MDCT)行肝脏增强后多期扫描 ,评价对肝细胞癌 (HCC)的检出。方法　回顾性分析明确诊断为HCC的患者 40例 ,共 61个HCC病灶 ;其中男 3 4例 ,女 6例 ;年龄3 3～ 76岁 ,平均 49岁。采用MarconiMX80 0 0CT扫描机行增强后多期扫描 ,动脉早期的延迟时间为 2 0s ,动脉晚期延迟时间为 3 4s左右 ,门脉期为 80s ,统计各期的病灶检出数 ,并对瘤径≥ 1cm的病灶行肿瘤及其邻近肝实质的密度值测量 ,计算其差值并行统计学分析。结果　本组 61个病灶中 ,瘤径≥ 1cm的病灶 47个 ,在增强后的动脉早期、动脉晚期及门脉期 ,肿瘤与肝脏密度差值各期间差异有显著性意义 (秩和检验 :χ2 =12 .0 7,P <0 .0 5)。在病灶检出率方面 ,61个病灶动脉早期检出率为 3 2 % ,动脉晚期检出率为 87% ,双动脉期检出率为 94% ,门脉期检出率为 82 %。经统计学分析 ,动脉早、晚期之间差异有非常显著性意义 (P <0 .0 0 1) ;动脉晚期加门脉期与动脉早期加门脉期之间对病灶检出的差异有显著性意义 (P <0 .0 5) ,双动脉期加门脉期与动脉晚期加门脉期的差异无显著性意义 (P >0 .0 5)。结论　采用MDCT行肝脏扫描 ,优化了动脉期的扫描方案 ,使全肝扫描落在真正的动脉期内 ,提高了HCC病灶检出的机会     

Trends in the use of unenhanced helical CT for acute urinary colic

OBJECTIVE: Unenhanced helical CT for urolithiasis detection is a limited CT examination that was designed specifically for the detection of urolithiasis. The purpose of this study was to repeat a prior study to assess whether clinicians had broadened the indications and changed the yield and findings of unenhanced helical CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients with suspected renal colic or flank pain referred for unenhanced helical CT were selected for this study. We reviewed the original radiographic reports for each patient and recorded the presence of ureteral calculi. Other urinary abnormalities and extraurinary lesions were also recorded and compared with the results of the previous study. RESULTS: In this study, 56% of the patients who underwent unenhanced helical CT had symptoms of urinary colic, and 44% of patients had unspecified flank pain, compared with 100% of patients with symptoms of urinary colic 1 year earlier. The sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced helical CT in detecting ureteral calculi were 96% and 99%, respectively. Ureteral calculi were identified in only 28% of the patients versus 49% of patients (p < .01) 1 year earlier. Extraurinary lesions were identified in 45% of the patients versus 16% (p < .01) 1 year before. CONCLUSION: As clinicians developed familiarity with this technique, the indications for performance of unenhanced helical CT were expanded with a consequent reduction in the rate of detection of stone disease and identification of an increased number of extraurinary lesions, which suggests a demand for emergency abdominal CT studies.     

Multidetector helical CT of the liver for tumor detection and characterization

Multidetector-row CT (MDCT) scanners have been recently introduced into clinical practice. Major attributes that are improved are the z-axis coverage speed and the longitudinal resolution. These improvements translate into rapid hepatic imaging and allow new imaging protocols. Thin sections can now be used on a routine basis in single-breath-hold technique. This results in improved lesion detection and the nearly isotropic image acquisition provides high-resolution multiplanar reformations. Furthermore, the ability to scan through the entire liver in 10 s or less allows acquisition of two separate sets of CT images of the liver within the time generally regarded as the hepatic arterial dominant phase in monoslice CT; thus, MDCT may demonstrate three clear separate distinct hepatic circulatory phases with a triple-pass technique. Multidetector-row CT with the improvements in morphological and functional information compared with single-slice CT enables a comprehensive approach to hepatic imaging within a single examination.