The effect of low molecular weight heparin on experimental thrombosis and haemostasis--the influence of production method

Three low molecular weight heparins prepared by enzymatic depolymerization, chemical degradation, and fractionation, respectively were studied in experimental thrombosis and haemostasis models in vivo and in biological assays in vitro. The three low molecular weight heparins, which had comparable molecular weight distributions, showed very similar activities both in vitro and in vivo. All three showed dose dependent thromboprophylactic effect. The antithrombotic effects of the low molecular weight heparins and conventional heparin administered in the same dose (30 XaI u/kg b.w.) did not differ. Neither LMW heparin nor conventional heparin (60 or 90 XaI u/kg b.w.) showed significant effects on the haemostatic plug formation time in the rabbit mesenteric microcirculation.

These experiments confirm that low molecular weight heparins are potential antithrombotic drugs, which by intravenous administration have effects similar to those of standard heparin. The method of preparation seems to be of no or minor importance, at least if the molecular weight distributions of the products are similar.     

Optimal dosing of subcutaneous unfractionated heparin for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis

Twice-daily, inpatient, subcutaneous unfractionated heparin is at least as effective and safe as continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin for the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin therefore may be suitable for outpatient treatment of deep vein thrombosis. The purpose of this study was to develop a dosing nomogram for a dose each 12 hours (2 doses per day) 12-hourly subcutaneous unfractionated heparin that is suitable for outpatient treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis. A cohort study was performed in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis in two phases. In both phases, the first subcutaneous loading dose of unfractionated heparin was 317 U/kg, and the second dose was 231 U/kg. The activated partial thromboplastin time was measured daily, 6 hours after the morning injection, and subsequent doses of unfractionated heparin were adjusted according to a nomogram, which was modified for phase II. Warfarin was started with unfractionated heparin. In phase I (14 outpatients), activated partial thromboplastin time results were frequently subtherapeutic (9:14) the day after starting unfractionated heparin (day 1), and were frequently supratherapeutic (27:40) after the first 2 days of unfractionated heparin therapy. In phase II (21 patients), to explain the frequently subtherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time results that were obtained on day 1, the activated partial thromboplastin time results were measured after the initial loading dose. Mean activated partial thromboplastin time results of 86 and 61 seconds were obtained 6 and 12 hours after this dose, suggesting that 317 U/kg is a suitable subcutaneous loading dose. In contrast to phase I, in phase II, unfractionated heparin dose was not increased on day 1 in response to a low activated partial thromboplastin time result. This reduced the frequency of supratherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time results during the early days of therapy without increasing the frequency of subtherapeutic results. Warfarin therapy had a substantal effect on the activated partial thromboplastin time that appeared to account for a high frequency of supratherapeutic results during the later days of unfractionated heparin therapy; the activated partial thromboplastin time increased by 20 seconds (95% CI, 14–27 seconds) with each increase in the International Normalized Ratio of 1.0. We had limited success at developing a dosing nomogram for subcutaneous unfractionated heparin that reliably achieved activated partial thromboplastin time results within the therapeutic range. However, as oral anticoagulants directly increased activated partial thromboplastin time results, we suggest that adjusting unfractionated heparin dose to achieve prespecified activated partial thromboplastin time results may not be appropriate in patients who are receiving concomitant warfarin therapy.     

Correlation between anti-Xa and occurrence of thrombosis and haemorrhage in post-surgical patients treated with either Logiparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin. Post-surgery Logiparin Study Group.

A total of 1290 patients (Pts) undergoing general surgery were enrolled in a randomized, multicentre double-blind study in order to investigate the efficacy and safety of two different doses of a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (Logiparin) for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis. Patients were randomized to either 5,000 IU unfractionated heparin twice daily, 2,500 anti-Xa or 3,500 anti-Xa units of Logiparin once daily. Each treatment was given subcutaneously two hours before surgery and continued for seven to ten days. All coagulation tests were performed blindly in a core laboratory. Blood samples were collected before surgery and then 3 hours after injection on Day 3 and 5 after surgery. Anti-Xa amidolytic activities were significantly higher in the two LMW Heparin groups than in the unfractionated heparin group (mean peak levels +/- s.e.m. on Day 3: 0.097 +/- 0.004; 0.152 +/- 0.004 and 0.034 +/- 0.003 IU respectively). As expected a significant correlation was observed between anti-Xa activity and the dose of LMW Heparin injected. The correlation coefficient was higher when the doses were expressed in anti-Xa units/kg body weight. However, the body weight accounts for only 16% of the interindividual variability of anti-Xa activity. Therefore, there is no clear evidence to suggest that weight-adjusted doses should be recommended when this LMW Heparin is used as prophylactic treatment in general surgery. A weak negative correlation was found between anti-Xa activity and thrombosis as demonstrated by a positive radiolabelled fibrinogen uptake test and confirmed by positive phlebography. No significant correlation was demonstrated between anti-Xa activity and the occurrence of postoperative bleeding.     

The effect of heparin fragments of different molecular weights on experimental thrombosis and haemostasis

The effect of heparin fragments of different molecular weights has been compared with that of conventional sodium heparin on experimental thrombosis in vivo and ex vivo and experimental haemostasis in vivo. In the first part of the study fragments of different molecular weights were given (4,900, 6,500, 9,500 and 22,200 dalton). All preparations including the control gave a significant prolongation of the haemostatic plug formation time in the rabbit mesenteric microcirculation, and all except the fragment with the lowest molecular weight reduced the frequency of jugular vein thrombosis (induced by a combination of endothelial denudation and stasis). There was a correlation between the XaI activity of the different heparin fragments and frequency of thrombosis. Using an ex vivo method (modification of Chandler's model) a dose dependent lag phase until start of thrombus formation was found. In the second part of the study a dose response investigation was made comparing different doses of a fragment (6,500 dalton) with conventional heparin in the same XaI doses (10, 30 and 60 units/kg). Sodium heparin in the highest dose prolonged the haemostatic plug formation time whereas none of the fragment doses did. The lowest dose both of the fragment and conventional heparin did not reduce the frequency of thrombosis, whereas the two higher doses did. Thus it may be possible to obtain preventive effect on thrombus formation with a heparin fragment.     

Effects of an enzymatically depolymerized heparin as compared with conventional heparin in healthy volunteers

A low molecular weight heparin (LMW-heparin) with a mean molecular weight of 4900 dalton was prepared by controlled enzymatic depolymerization of conventional porcine mucosal heparin. The effects of 2,500, 5,000 and 10,000 U (XaI; 29, 58 and 116 mg) on factor Xa inhibition (XaI), factor IIa inhibition (IIaI), APTT, AT III and platelet count were compared to those of 5,000 U (XaI; 26 mg) of conventional heparin given s.c. to 6 healthy volunteers. 5,000 U (XaI; 58 mg) of LMW-heparin was given i.v. A dose related response with regard to the XaI and the IIa-inhibitory activities with peak values at 4 hours after the s.c. injections was obtained. An increase of the XaI/IIaI ratio over the time after injection was seen only after i.v. administration of the LMW-heparin. The APTT was only slightly prolonged and remained within normal range after s.c. injection. AT III and platelet counts were unaffected. The biological half life of the LMW-heparin was 111 minutes if assayed by Xa inhibition, 76 minutes if assayed by IIa inhibition and 40 minutes if assayed by APTT. A strong correlation between the XaI activities obtained and body weight was seen, indicating that LMW-heparin should be administered individually according to body weight.     

Effects of immuno-potent drugs and their association with an unfractionated heparin on an experimental venous thrombosis.

Immuno-potent drugs are largely used in human medicine. The aim of this study was to determine the role of two immuno-modulators (sodium diethyl-dithiocarbamate, RU 41 740) and two immuno-suppressors (methylprednisolone, cyclosporin A) alone or in association with an unfractionated heparin (Calciparin), on an experimental venous thrombosis made by vena cava ligation in male Wistar rats. Each immuno-potent drug was administered for six days before the thrombus induction at the same dosage (10mg/kg b.w.), and the Calciparin, used as treatment of the thrombosis, was administered two hours after the thrombus induction at the dose of 1mg/kg b.w. Immuno-treatment potentiated thrombus formation: the increase in thrombus weight was greater with immuno-modulators (43% on average in comparison with placebo) than with immuno-suppressors (20%). In association with Calciparin the antithrombotic effect was also potentiated and more marked with the immuno-modulators than with immuno-suppressors. An increase in circulating monocytes was observed in all groups whether Calciparin was present or not. Coagulation tests were not affected by immuno-therapy. However, immuno-modulators led to an inhibition of platelet aggregation. In conclusion, this trial seems to show a probable effect of immunological cells in thrombosis and in the antithrombotic effect of heparin, but the mechanism involved is not yet determined.     

Randomized controlled study of heparin and low molecular weight heparin for prevention of deep-vein thrombosis in medical patients

166 patients aged 40-80 years were included in a controlled, randomized, double-blind study to determine the efficacy and safety of a single daily injection of a low molecular weight (LMW) heparin for prevention of deep-vein thrombosis compared to low dose conventional heparin. Patients received 1 x 1.500 aPTT units of a LMW heparin fraction (plus 2 x placebo injection) or 3 x 5.000 IU of an unfractionated heparin. During 10 days of treatment, patients underwent repeated clinical investigation, serial impedance plethysmography, and Doppler sonography for detection of thrombosis of the lower limbs. Combined application of these methods revealed evidence of thrombosis in 4.5% of patients on unfractionated heparin and 3.6% of patients on LMW heparin. Subcutaneous hematomas were significantly smaller in diameter upon treatment with LMW heparin (p less than 0.001). Antithrombin III levels were significantly higher at the end of the observation period in the LMW heparin group (p less than 0.005). Thrombocyte count, transaminases, creatinine, and haemoglobin did not change in either group. The results indicate that LMW heparin administered by a single s.c. dose daily may be as effective as low dose heparin in prevention of deep venous thrombosis in medical inpatients.     

Treatment of deep venous thrombosis with low-molecular-weight heparin during pregnancy

Low-molecular-weight (LMW) heparins have been shown to be at least as effective as unfractionated (UF) heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in nonpregnant subjects. LMW heparins have been shown to be safe when used during pregnancy as they do not cross the placenta. Up to now, they have been used mainly in thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and rarely in the treatment of acute DVT in pregnant women. In a prospective observational study, we compared the effectiveness and safety of the LMW heparin, dalteparin, with UF heparin in the initial treatment (first week) of DVT during pregnancy. After confirmation of DVT by ultrasonography, 10 women were treated with UF heparin (25,430 IU/day, mean) and 21 women with dalteparin (16,000 IU/day, mean) for 7 days and, thereafter, all women were given treatment doses of LMW heparin for another 2 weeks. The dose was then gradually decreased and kept at a high prophylactic dose until delivery. One patient in the dalteparin group had recurrence of DVT 2 weeks after starting the treatment. No differences were observed between the groups in symptoms or bleeding complications during pregnancy and delivery. Our results indicate that LMW heparin is as effective and safe as UF heparin for the first week of treatment, but LMW heparin has the advantage of being easily administered and few laboratory controls are required.     

Outpatient treatment of pulmonary embolism with dalteparin

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism is a common complication of deep vein thrombosis. It has been established that low molecular weight heparin may be used to treat deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism and randomized studies have established that outpatient management of deep vein thrombosis with low molecular weight heparin is at least as effective as in-hospital management with unfractionated heparin. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of eligible patients with pulmonary embolism managed as outpatients using dalteparin (200 U/kg s/c daily) for a minimum of five days and warfarin for 3 months. Outpatients included those managed exclusively out of hospital and those managed initially for 1-3 days as inpatients who then completed therapy out of hospital. Reasons for admission included hemodynamic instability; hypoxia requiring oxygen therapy; admission for another medical reason; severe pain requiring parenteral analgesia or high risk of major bleeding. Patients were followed for three months for clinically apparent recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding. RESULTS: Between three teaching hospitals, a total of 158 patients with pulmonary embolism were identified. Fifty patients were managed as inpatients and 108 as outpatients. Of the outpatients, 27 were managed for an average of 2.5 days as inpatients and then completed dalteparin therapy as outpatients. The remaining 81 patients were managed exclusively as outpatients with dalteparin. For all outpatients the overall symptomatic recurrence rate of venous thromboembolism was 5.6% (6/108) with only 1.9% (2/108) major bleeds. There were a total of four deaths with none due to pulmonary embolism or major bleed. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study suggests that outpatient management of pulmonary embolism is feasible and safe for the majority of patients.     

Hemostatic activation under anticoagulant treatment: a comparison of unfractionated heparin vs. nadroparin in the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple clinical trials have been performed to compare standard heparin with low molecular weight heparin in the therapy of deep vein thrombosis, but little is known about the time course of the markers of hemostatic system during the treatment with these two heparin regimens. METHODS: Twenty patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis confirmed by duplex ultrasound and phlebography were randomly assigned to either unfractionated heparin (UH) given as an intravenous bolus of 80 U/kg followed by a constant infusion of 18 U/kg/h, or nadroparin 185 AXa IU/kg once daily subcutaneously. Oral anticoagulants were started at day 4. Markers of hemostatic activation (F1+2, FPA, TAT, D-dimer) were measured daily for 4 days. Primary endpoints were the time course of these markers; secondary endpoints consisted in the evaluation of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications by clinical outcome and Marder score. RESULTS: Treatment with UH resulted in a rapid achievement of therapeutic heparin levels. UH reduced markers of fibrin formation and fibrinolysis more rapidly than nadroparin (p < 0.05). Within the nadroparin group activation of prothrombotic markers four hours after the subcutaneous injection (peak level) was significantly lower when compared with the time prior to injection (trough level). Secondary endpoints showed no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Continuous intravenous perfusion of UH administered on a basis of a weight-adjusted nomogram controlled markers of the hemostatic system more rapidly than once-daily subcutaneously administered weight-adjusted nadroparin.     

The influence of low molecular weight heparin in combination with dihydroergotamine on experimental thrombosis and haemostasis

The influence of low molecular weight heparin in combination with dihydroergotamine (DHE) on thrombus formation and primary haemostasis was investigated in rabbit models. Conventional heparin in the dose of 60 units anti Xa activity/kg b. w. effectively prevented thrombus formation but the same dose of a low molecular weight fragment only gave a marginal decrease of the frequency of thrombosis. The thrombus weight was, however, significantly reduced. Doubling the dose of the heparin fragment totally abolished thrombus formation as did the combination of 60 units with DHE. With DHE it was also possible to diminish the low molecular weight heparin dose to 30 units with a good prophylactic effect. There was a small but significant increase of haemostatic plug formation time in all treatment groups except the one with low molecular weight heparin fragment 30 units anti Xa activity combined with DHE. Thus, by combining low molecular weight heparin in a low dose with DHE it is possible to prevent thrombus formation without influencing primary haemostasis in rabbits.     

A comparison between low molecular weight heparin (KABI 2165) and standard heparin in the intravenous treatment of deep venous thrombosis

In order to study whether a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) of mw 4000 D is effective in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), patients with DVT verified by phlebography were randomized to treatment by continuous intravenous infusion of either unfractionated heparin (UFH) or LMWH. The initial dose was 240 U (anti F Xa)/kg/12 h. This study (study I) was stopped because of major bleeding in 2 newly operated patients in the LMWH group after 27 patients had been treated. The heparin activity measured as F Xa inhibition assayed in retrospect, was found to be much higher in the LMWH group (mean 1.6-2.0 anti F Xa U/ml) than in the UFH group (mean 0.5-0.8 anti F Xa U/ml). A second study was therefore initiated in which the DVT patients were randomly given UFH (240 U/kg/12 h) or LMWH only 120 U (anti F Xa)/kg/12 h, as initial doses (study II). In this study 27 patients could be evaluated, the mean heparin activity still being higher in the LMWH group (0.9-1.2 anti F Xa U/ml) than in the UFH group (0.5-0.7 anti F Xa U/ml). A second phlebographic investigation showed progression of thrombus size in 3 (11%) of the UFH patients of studies I and II (n = 29) and improvement in 14 (48%). There was no progression in any LMWH patient, 6 (50%) had improved in study I and 10 (77%) in study II. The mean decrease of thrombus size score (according to Marder) during treatment did not differ between the 3 groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Subcutaneous administration of heparin a randomised comparison with intravenous administration of heparin to patients with deep-vein thrombosis

One-hundred and forty-one patients with clinical signs of acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in the legs were randomly allocated to recieve heparin either as two daily subcutaneous injections (s.c.) or as continuous intravenous infusion (i.v.). The thrombi extended into the popliteal or femoral veins in 83% of the patients. Verification of diagnosis and evaluation of therapy was performed by phlebography, plethysmography and thermography.

The results showed that heparin administered s.c. twice daily was as efficient as continuous i.v. infusion in preventing extension of the thrombus. In two patients the s.c. administration was stopped due to local haematomas at the injection sites. Retroperitoneal or intramuscular bleedings occurred in four patients, two in each group. Two major, non-fatal pulmonary emboli occurred, one in each group.     

Low-molecular-weight heparin in the acute and long-term treatment of deep vein thrombosis

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are frequently used during acute treatment of deep vein thrombosis, but their utility for long-term treatment needs to be defined. In this multi-centre trial, 378 patients with acute deep vein thrombosis were randomised to intravenous unfractionated heparin (group A), once daily subcutaneous LMWH (bemiparin) for one week (group B) or once daily bemiparin in a therapeutic dose for one week followed by a maintenance dose for 12 weeks (group C). Fifty-two per cent of patients in group A, 72% of group B and 72% of group C showed venographic reduction in thrombus size assessed objectively on day 14; 20% greater improvement in group B and C indicates not only non-inferiority of bemiparin (p = 0.00003) but also superiority (p = 0.004) compared to UFH. Day 84 venographic or Doppler sonographic recanalisation of the affected veins was demonstrated in 75.3%, 79.8% and 81.5% in groups A, B and C respectively. Mortality, recurrent thromboembolic events and bleeding were similar in the three groups. Both bemiparin regimens were more effective than UFH in reducing thrombus size during the acute phase of treatment. The efficacy in terms of recurrence of venous thromboembolism and safety of Bemiparin is similar to UFH. Bemiparin is also an effective alternative to warfarin for long-term treatment.     

Two daily subcutaneous injections of fragmin as compared with intravenous standard heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT)

In a prospective, randomized, open study 119 consecutive patients with phlebographically verified deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the leg (36% distal and 64% proximal) were treated either with a low molecular weight heparin (Fragmin, Kabi-Vitrum) subcutaneously (120 anti-FXa U/kg) twice daily or standard heparin (SH) as continuous intravenous infusion (480 IU kg-1 day-1). The Fragmin doses were adjusted to achieve an anti-FXa activity of 0.2-0.4 U/ml before injection and not greater than 1.5 U/ml 4 h after the morning injection. The SH dose was modified to prolong the APTT 2-3 times. Repeat phlebography after 5-7 days showed improvement in 34/45 patients (76%) in the Fragmin group and in 30/49 patients (61%) in the SH group and progress in 2/45 (4%) and 3/49 (6%), respectively. The mean Marder scores decreased from 18.7 +/- 12.1 to 15.7 +/- 12.7 in the Fragmin group and from 16.9 +/- 12.0 to 14.4 +/- 11.8 in the SH group (ns). Two patients in the SH group and none in the Fragmin group had major bleedings. After 22 +/- 7 months follow up 6 rethromboses had occurred in the SH group and 4 in the Fragmin group. Postthrombotic signs and symptoms were similar in both groups. We conclude that two daily sc Fragmin doses seem as effective and safe as continuous SH in the treatment of DVT of the leg.     

Prevention of postoperative venous thrombosis: a randomized trial comparing unfractionated heparin with low molecular weight heparin in patients undergoing total hip replacement

A double blind randomized trial comparing subcutaneous enoxaparin (40 mg once daily) with standard unfractionated calcium heparin administered at a dose of 5,000 units every 8 hours in patients undergoing elective hip replacement has been performed. Treatment regimens began 12 hours preoperatively with enoxaparin, 2 hours preoperatively with standard unfractionated calcium heparin, and were continued for 15 days or until discharge. Venography was performed in all patients. Two hundred thirty-seven patients were included in the study: 113 received unfractionated heparin and 124 received enoxaparin. The incidence of proximal deep vein thrombosis was reduced from 18.5% in the unfractionated heparin group to 7.5% in the enoxaparin group (p = 0.014), and the incidence of total deep vein thrombosis was similarly reduced from 25% to 12.5% (p = 0.03). There were two major bleeding episodes and one minor bleed in the enoxaparin group compared to two minor bleeds in the unfractionated heparin group. Patients who received enoxaparin required fewer red blood cell transfusions and had a significantly higher hemoglobin on postoperative days 3 and 4. Thus prophylaxis with enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily, is simple, safe and more effective than standard low dose unfractionated heparin in preventing deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing elective hip replacement.     

Controlled multicenter pilot study of urokinase- heparin and streptokinase in deep vein thrombosis

Thirty-three patients with acute iliofemoral thrombosis were randomly assigned to three treatment groups in a pilot dose-ranging study of thrombolytic therapy in deep vein thrombosis. One group received tissue culture urokinase in a dose of 2,200 I.U./kg/hr, and a second group in a dose of 1,100 I.U./kg/hr following a loading dose of 4,400 I.U./kg given in ten min. Urokinase was administered for 12 hr periods, alternating with 12 hr periods of heparin. A third group received an initial dose of 250,000 I.U. of streptokinase in 20 min, followed by 100,000 I.U./hr. Treatment of all patients continued for three days. At the end of this period little improvement, evaluated by "blinded" interpretation of pre- and post-treatment phlebograms, was found in five out of ten of the higher-dose urokinase patients, seven out of eleven of lower-dosage urokinase patients, and six out of ten of streptokinase patients. Optional treatment for another three days showed little further improvement of urokinase-patients and moderate further improvement in the streptokinase-patients. Neither of the 2 dosage schemes at intermittent application of urokinase appeared to be advantageous. Urokinase treated patients experienced fewer adverse reactions.     

Anticoagulant efficacy and immunogenicity of the selective factor Xa inhibitor antistasin following subcutaneous administration in the rhesus monkey.

The antithrombotic efficacy and duration of action of a single subcutaneous administration of the selective factor Xa inhibitor recombinant antistasin (rATS) was evaluated in a rhesus monkey model of mild disseminated intravascular coagulation. rATS (1 mg/kg) was shown to be fully effective and comparable to standard heparin (1,000 U/kg) in the suppression of thromboplastin-induced fibrinopeptide A generation for at least 5 h following a single subcutaneous administration. The absorption rate of rATS, as measured by ex vivo activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTT), mirrored that of standard heparin exhibiting peak anticoagulant activity between 1 and 2 h post administration. The anticoagulant effects of a single rATS dose lasted for longer than 30 h maintaining an aPTT value at least 2-fold higher than baseline. Repeated subcutaneous administrations of rATS resulted in the generation of fully neutralizing antibodies. These results suggest that specific factor Xa inhibition may be as effective as standard heparin in the treatment of venous thrombosis. Due to its antigenicity however, rATS is probably not suitable for chronic subcutaneous anticoagulant therapy.     

Anticoagulant effects of two types of low molecular weight heparin administered subcutaneously

Two types of LMW heparin were prepared by gel filtration of standard heparin (LMW fraction) and by degradation of heparin by nitrous acid (LMW fragment), respectively. The effects on factor Xa inhibition (XaI), APTT, platelet aggregation and AT III level of these preparations were studied after subcutaneous administration to humans and compared with those of standard heparin. At a dose of 5000 IU (XaI) the LMW fraction and LMW fragment induced peak plasma XaI activity of 0.32 IU/ml and 0.41 IU/ml respectively, compared to 0.07 IU/ml for heparin. Still 11.5 h after administration both LMW preparations gave higher activities than heparin ever induced. Following administration of 10,000 IU (XaI) of the LMW fragment the plasma peak XaI activity was 0.81 IU/ml. This prolonged the APTT from 36 sec to 46 sec only. The half-lives of the XaI activity in plasma were between 3 and 4 hours. No effect on platelet aggregation or AT-III level was demonstrated.     

Heparin in der Akutphase des ischämischen Schlaganfalls

Therapy with low- or high-dose heparin in acute stroke is changing. Despite several clinical studies (>20), some with quite large numbers of patients, no statistically significant benefit was found for the clinical endpoints of death and functional outcome. This negative result remains even when considering the preventive effect of high-dose heparin on secondary acute embolic events (e.g., cardiac emboli-arrhythmia) and low-dose heparin on venous thrombosis. Based on study results, most reviews and therapy recommendations for the treatment of acute stroke generally decline the use of high-dose heparins and heparinoids with full anticoagulation for improving outcome or preventing secondary embolic events as well as low-dose applications for venous thrombosis prophylaxis. This paper reviews the literature and presents the data of a standardised survey on coagulation therapy in acute stroke patients from all university and major stroke units in Germany (n=33). Contrary to the restrictive recommendations, therapy with heparin is firmly established in most stroke units. Full anticoagulation with heparin ("full dose") is performed on selected patients in 32/33 stroke units (97%). The selection criteria and thus the frequency of high-dose heparin use varies widely among the different centers. Almost all German stroke units (97%) routinely use low-dose heparin to prevent venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.The heparin agents and dosage, however, vary. These data correspond to those from the USA and Canada,where daily routine also departs from evidence-based treatment recommendations. That may be due to individual pathophysiological and aetiological considerations and of course the low acceptance of treatment recommendations based on classic, randomised trials. This underlines the need for new concepts (e.g.observational trials, continuous registers, etc.) addressing the adaptation of study-related conditions to the much more complex situation of daily routine (with risk/benefit, safety, and economic variables).