Multivessel off-pump revascularization in octogenarians: early and midterm outcomes

BACKGROUND: Octogenarians are increasingly being referred for coronary artery revascularization. However, the prevalence of comorbid events and the propensity for neurologic dysfunction place octogenarians at higher risk for cardiopulmonary bypass-induced morbidity and mortality. Therefore, octogenarian patients represent a particularly attractive target for application of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: From January 1999 to August 2001, 113 octogenarians had off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Their data were prospectively entered into the cardiac surgery database and analyzed retrospectively. Follow-up information was obtained through telephone survey. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 83 +/- 2.5 years, and the mean number of grafts per patient was 3.3 +/- 1. The most prevalent postoperative complication was atrial fibrillation (43%). Postoperative neurologic complications were seen in 5 patients (4%). There was one postoperative death (30-day mortality rate, 0.9%). The mean follow-up was 13.2 +/- 7 months and was complete for 90% of the patients. At the time of telephone survey, 85 (87%) of 98 patients were free from angina, and 91 (88%) were free from cardiac-related readmission. There were three late deaths. The majority of octogenarians (66%) reported that in retrospect, they would have the operation again. CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump multivessel revascularization in octogenarians is associated with excellent early and intermediate outcomes and provides a satisfactory quality of life.     

Multivessel off-pump revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of multivessel beating heart revascularization in a high-risk group of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction as well as to provide intermediate survival and quality of life data. METHODS: Our prospectively updated database was queried to extract all patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or =30% who underwent beating heart revascularization. Standard demographics, clinical profiles and outcomes were collected. Outcomes were compared with Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) benchmarks for all coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients. Telephone interviews were conducted and survival and quality of life data were tabulated. In addition, morbidity and mortality outcomes were compared with a concurrent cohort of patients with similarly impaired left ventricular function who underwent conventional coronary artery bypass. RESULTS: One hundred off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting patients were identified and follow-up was 93% complete in these patients. Mean age was 67+/-10.5 years and mean ejection fraction was 26+/-4%. Twenty-one percent were females. Balloon counterpulsation support was used liberally in the perioperative period. Patients received a mean of 3.5 grafts with 83% internal mammary artery use. Observed mortality was 3% with a predicted mortality of 5.3%. Observed to expected ratio was 0.56. Incidence of adverse events compared favorably with both that reported in the STS for all CABG patients regardless of left ventricular function, and also to a concurrent CABG cohort. One-year survival was 85%. Freedom from cardiac readmission was 88% and freedom from angina was 83%. No patient required repeat percutaneous or surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that multivessel off-pump revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction is a safe and effective alternative to conventional grafting. Long-term follow-up is mandatory to confirm these encouraging intermediate outcomes.     

Coronary revascularization using only arterial grafts in patients with left main coronary artery stenosis]

Although increasing use is being made of arterial grafts (internal thoracic arteries and right gastroepiploic artery) for coronary revascularization, application to left main coronary artery (LMT) patients is frequently not possible. During the period from December 1989 to July 1991, coronary revascularization was conducted on 9 LMT patients using only arterial grafts and no venous grafts. The bypass grafts were 6 left internal thoracic artery grafts, 9 right internal thoracic artery grafts and 9 right gastroepiploic artery grafts, a total of 24 grafts and an average of 2.7 bypasses per patient. There were no operated deaths, but five patients required IABP support after cardiopulmonary bypass. They had more than 90% stenotic lesions of left main coronary artery. In contrast, four patients with less than 90% stenotic lesion were uneventful. The cause of these catastrophic hemodynamics was considered reduced blood flow by graft spasm. All patients could be functionally placed in New York Heart Association Class I or II. Postoperative stress tests were made on eight patients and the results were normal in seven. Eight patients have had postoperative angiograms. Twenty-one of 22 grafts were patent. The present results demonstrate that an arterial bypass is possible even on LMT patients by IABP support.     

Outcome and selection of revascularization strategy in left main coronary artery stenosis

Objectives. To investigate clinical outcome in unselected real-life patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis and determine factors associated with selection of revascularization strategy. Design. Consecutive patients with ULMCA stenosis at our institution in 2009–2013 (n?=?308) were retrospectively analyzed with propensity score adjusted Cox proportional hazards models for outcome. Baseline characteristics in relation to selection of revascularization strategy were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression. Results. Patients that underwent PCI (n?=?94) had a higher risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; adjusted HR 2.13 [95% CI 1.08–4.19]) than patients that had CABG surgery but there was no difference in the combination of death and MI (adjusted HR 1.17 [95% CI 0.50–2.75]). Later year of index angiography, age, Euroscore II and angiographer favoring PCI was associated with PCI as revascularization strategy. Higher SYNTAX score, higher systolic blood pressure and angiographer favoring CABG was associated with CABG. Conclusions. In consecutive patients with ULMCA stenosis PCI is associated with higher MACCE rates than CABG but there is no difference in death and MI. Later year of index angiography, higher age, lower systolic blood pressure, higher predicted per-procedural surgical risk, less complex coronary anatomy and angiographer favoring PCI increased the probability of revascularization with PCI instead of CABG.     

Left main coronary artery stenosis: early experience with surgical revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND: To determine the safety of surgical revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in left main stem (LMS) coronary stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between October 1996 and April 1998, 67 consecutive patients with a > or =50% LMS stenosis underwent coronary revascularization without bypass (BH) and were compared to a contemporary group of 160 patients revascularized with conventional bypass (CPB). Mean ages in both groups were similar: 63.1 and 64.5 years in BH and CPB groups respectively (p=0.91). Significant triple vessel disease occurred in 40 (80%) and 75 (47.5%) patients in BH and CPB groups respectively (p=NS). Average grafts per patient was numbered 3.1 in BH group and 2.9 in CPB group (p=NS). The perioperative infarction rate (defined arbitrarily as a CK-MB >100 U/l) was 4% (2 patients, excluding 1 preoperative infarct) and 3.1% (5 patients, excluding 2 preoperative infarcts) in groups BH and CPB respectively (p=0.28). Postoperative blood transfusion requirements were less in BH group (19 patients, 38%) compared to CPB group (103 patients, 64.4%), (p=0.04). Postoperative inotropic requirements were similar in both groups; BH group (15 patients, 30%) and CPB group (72 patients, 45%). Mean hospital stay was 6.4 and 7.6 days in BH and CPB groups respectively (p=0.49). The hospital mortality rate was 0% and 3.8% (6 patients) in BH and CPB groups respectively (p=NS). CONCLUSIONS: Our early experience suggests that non-CPB surgical revascularization in LMS stenosis is a feasible and safe alternative to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Early and midterm outcome after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with poor left ventricular function compared with patients with normal function

OBJECTIVE: As there are few reports on the clinical results of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) in patients with poor left ventricular (LV) function, the safety and efficacy of OPCAB surgery in such patients remains unclear. METHODS: From January 2002 to May 2007, a total of 519 consecutive patients underwent isolated myocardial revascularization via OPCAB. We compared the early and midterm results of 79 patients with poor LV function [ejection fraction (EF) < 40%] with those of 319 patients with normal LV function (EF >or= 50%). Follow-up was completed in 96.2% of the patients. RESULTS: There were no significant intergroup differences in the number of grafts per patient or the rate of achievement of complete revascularization. No patient in either group was converted from off-pump to on-pump. The overall 30-day mortality was 1.0%. The mean follow-up was 3.0 +/- 1.3 years. Five-year freedom from death from all causes was 57.7% in the low-EF group and 83.6% in the normal-EF group. The rates of freedom from cardiac death were 73.2% and 93.7%, respectively; and the rates of freedom from the combined endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, repeat coronary intervention, and heart failure requiring treatment were 65.7% and 77.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: OPCAB surgery in patients with poor LV function can be performed safely with the same quality in terms of the number of grafts and rate of complete revascularization as in patients with normal LV function. There are higher mortality and cardiac event rates in patients with poor LV function than those with normal LV function at the midterm evaluation after OPCAB.     

Left coronary ostial stenosis: comparison with left main coronary artery stenosis

We compared 147 consecutive patients who had left coronary ostial stenosis with 254 consecutive patients who had left main coronary artery stenosis treated with coronary artery bypass grafting. Mean age for the left main group was 61.6 years versus 59.7 years for the left ostial group (p = not significant [NS]). In the left ostial group, 43.5% were female and in the left main group, 12% (p less than 0.005). Prior myocardial infarction had occurred in 53% of patients with left main stenosis and 36% of patients with left ostial stenosis (p less than 0.005). There were 2.45 +/- 1.00 diseased vessels in the left main group and 1.96 +/- 1.09 in the left ostial group (p less than 0.0005). Seven (3%) of the patients with left main stenosis had no associated coronary disease (greater than 50%) versus 24 (16%) of the left ostial group (p less than 0.005). The degree of left main stenosis was 90% or more in 28.3% of patients versus 42.8% with equivalent ostial narrowing (p less than 0.01). Left ventricular function was better in the left ostial group than in the left main group (1.61 +/- 0.93 versus 2.02 +/- 1.11, respectively; p less than 0.0005). One-month mortality was 10 patients (3.9%) in the left main group and 8 (5.4%) in the left ostial group (p = NS). Perioperative infarction occurred in 8.6% of patients with left main stenosis and 4.7% of patients with left ostial stenosis (p = NS). Mean follow-up was 6.1 years for the left main group and 5.4 years for the left ostial group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术在左主干病变病人中的应用

目的 探讨不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术（0PCAB）在左主干病变病人中应用的可行性和特点。方法 2002年5月至2006年5月，97例伴有左主干病变的冠心病病人施行了OPCAB，同期为86例伴有左主干病变的冠心病病人行体外循环下的冠状动脉旁路移植术（CABG）。对两组病人术前、术后的临床资料进行对比分析。结果 OPCAB和CABG组术前平均年龄（68．1±4．9）岁对（64．3±6．5）岁，P〈0．05；术前慢性阻塞性肺疾病史10．3％对2．3％，P〈0．05；术前肌酐高于正常者5．2％对0，P〈0．05；术前脑梗塞病史12.4％对3．5％，P〈0．05。术后OPCAB和CABG组病死率为1．03％对1．16％，P：0．93；房颤发生率14．4％对27．9％，P=0．02。结论 对伴有左主干病变的冠心病病人行OPCAB临床效果良好。     

Multivessel coronary revascularization with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts

Sixteen patients underwent coronary revascularization with bilateral internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts between 1988 and 1989 at the Okayama University Hospital. A total 39 coronary grafts were performed, being an average of 2.4 grafts per patient. Each patient received bilateral ITA grafts, and in 5 patients an additional 7 grafts were constructed with 5 autologous veins and 2 gastroepiloic arteries. The right ITA was grafted as a free graft in 4 patients. The ITA graft patency rate was 96.8 per cent (31/32) at the time of hospital discharge. The postoperative morbidity included one reoperation for bleeding and one myocardial infarction. Coronary artery bypass grafting with bilateral ITA grafts can be safely performed and its application facilitates complete revascularization with arterial grafts.     

Total arterial off-pump versus on-pump coronary revascularization: comparison of early outcome

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To assess differences in the early outcome after complete arterial myocardial revascularization with (ONCAB) or without cardiopulmonary bypass (OPCAB). METHODS: Out of 870 consecutive CABG procedures 58 OPCAB and 91 ONCAB patients receiving exclusive arterial grafts were analyzed. OPCAB patients had more single-vessel (p < 0.0001), less triple-vessel (p < 0.0001) or left main disease (p = 0.0021), higher angina class (p = 0.003), unstable angina (p < 0.0001) or previous PTCAs (p < 0.0001). RESULTS: ONCAB was associated with longer operations (182.5 +/- 38 vs. 147 +/- 56 min; p = 0.0001) and more anastomoses/patient (3.2 +/- 1 vs. 2 +/- 0.9; p < 0.0001), but incomplete revascularization was similar in both groups (11% vs. 17%; p = ns). ITA use was identical, whereas single left internal thoracic artery (LITA) use (25.9% vs.1%; p < 0.0001) and LITA jump anastomoses (10.3% vs. 7.7%; p < 0.0001) were more frequent in OPCAB. Radial artery (RA) use (89% vs. 46.6%; p < 0.0001) and RA jump anastomoses (57.1% vs. 12.1%; p < 0.0001) were more frequent in ONCAB. Mortality, arrhythmias, cerebro-vascular accidents (CVA), and renal failure were similar, but ventilatory support shorter (8.8 +/- 11.8 vs. 15.6 +/- 9.4 h; p < 0.0001) and cardiac enzyme release smaller (p < 0.0001) after OPCAB with a trend toward less myocardial infarction (1.7% vs. 7.7%; p = 0.12) and low output (1.7% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.089), and more respiratory complications (10.3% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Arterial OPCAB patients have less extensive CAD, but more severe symptoms. Early outcome is similar concerning mortality, arrhythmias, CVA, renal failure, or ICU and hospital stay, but with shorter ventilatory support and lower cardiac enzymes with a trend toward lower myocardial infarction and low output, but higher respiratory complication rates after OPCAB.     

Early and midterm clinical outcome in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery surgery

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction undergoing coronary artery surgery are at increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. The present study investigated early and midterm outcomes in a consecutive series of patients with severe LV dysfunction undergoing coronary surgery at our institution. METHODS: Data on 5,195 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone (in-hospital mortality 1.35%) from April 1996 to August 2002 were prospectively recorded in the Patient Analysis and Tracking System. Two hundred and fifty patients (median age 65 years [interquartile range, 57 to 70]) with preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30% (74 off pump; 29.6%) were identified and early and midterm clinical outcomes analyzed. Propensity scores were used to take account of the imbalance in the distribution of prognostic factors between the on-pump and off-pump groups. RESULTS: Patients undergoing on-pump surgery were less likely to have current congestive heart failure, insulin-dependent diabetes, a history of hypertension, have had gastrointestinal tract surgery or an ulcer, or unstable angina. They had on average lower Parsonnet scores and New York Heart Association and Canadian Cardiovascular Score ratings. However they were more likely to have more extensive coronary artery heart disease and to require more grafts than those undergoing off-pump surgery. After adjustment for consultant team and propensity scores no differences between groups with regard to in-hospital mortality and morbidity were found. The only in-hospital outcome to show a significant difference after adjustment was the need for intraoperative inotropic support, which was higher in the on-pump group (odds ratio 5.1; 95% confidence interval 2.55 to 10.2; p < 0.001)). The median follow-up times for the on- and off-pump groups were 3.4 years and 1.4 years respectively. Three-year survival was higher with on-pump surgery (87% on-pump versus 73% off-pump) but this difference did not reach statistical significance after adjustment for prognostic variables (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 1.26, p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality and morbidity in patients presenting with severe LV dysfunction is low with comparable results with both on- and off-pump coronary artery surgery. Midterm clinical outcome is encouraging and seems to justify surgical revascularization for this high-risk group of patients.     

High mortality after coronary bypass surgery in patients with high-grade left main coronary artery stenosis

OBJECTIVE: To determine mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in relation to degree of left main coronary artery (LMCA) obstruction. DESIGN: All patients without LMCA stenosis (n=3370), with low-grade stenosis (n = 261), high-grade stenosis (n = 224) or total occlusion of the LMCA (n = 15) were followed for ten years after CABG performed during 1970-1989. RESULTS: Early mortality was 1.9% and 2.3%, respectively, if there was no or a low-grade LMCA stenosis vs. 6.3% if the stenosis was high-grade. Ten-year survival was 76% if no LMCA obstruction, 74% if low-grade stenosis and 64% if the stenosis was high-grade. Risk of early death (odds ratio 2.6, 95% CI 1.4-4.8) and mortality at ten years (relative risk 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.0) was higher in patients with high-grade stenosis than in those without LMCA stenosis. There was no increased long-term mortality in patients with low-grade stenosis or among the few patients with occlusion of the LMCA. CONCLUSIONS: High-grade LMCA stenosis was associated with a three-fold increased risk of early and fifty percent higher risk of late death than in patients without LMCA stenosis.