Hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis: primary and secondary treatments are safe and effective

PURPOSE: To retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) treatment of eyes with primary hyperopia and consecutive hyperopia after initial myopic treatment. METHODS: Thirty-two eyes of 19 patients with primary hyperopia (group 1) and 37 eyes of 26 patients with consecutive hyperopia after initial myopic LASIK overcorrection (group 2) that had LASIK for hyperopia with the Hansatome microkeratome and VISX S2 Smoothscan excimer laser with 6 months' follow-up after surgery were analyzed. Uncorrected visual acuity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, fogged manifest refraction, and corneal topography with corneal irregularity measurement (CIM) were evaluated 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: In group 1, the mean preoperative cycloplegic spherical equivalent was +4.0 +/- 4.5 diopters (D) (range, +1.5 to + 8.75 D) and the 6-month postoperative cycloplegic spherical equivalent was +0.26 +/- 1.74 D (range, -3.00 to +2.75 D). Fifty-three percent of eyes (n= 17) in group 1 were within 1 D of emmetropia. Sixty-six percent of eyes (n= 21) had uncorrected visual acuity of at least 20/40. Three eyes (9%) lost two lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Changes in uncorrected visual acuity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, and the CIM topographic index 6 months after surgery were statistically significant compared with the preoperative values. In group 2, the mean preoperative cycloplegic spherical equivalent was +1.58 +/- 0.35 D (range, +0.125 to +2.75 D), and the mean postoperative cycloplegic spherical equivalent was -0.48 +/- 0.46 (range, -2.75 to +0.38 D). Eighty-six percent of eyes (n= 32) were within 1 D of emmetropia. Eighty-four percent of eyes (n= 31) in group 2 had uncorrected visual acuity of at least 20/40. One eye (2.7%) lost two lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Complications included an epithelial nest that resolved 3 months after surgery in one eye in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK is a relatively safe treatment of primary hyperopia and hyperopia resulting from overcorrection after initial LASIK treatment of myopia (consecutive hyperopia). Patients with high hyperopia (>5 D) are at risk for loss of two lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. A reduction in the level of attempted correction appears to be necessary in the treatment of consecutive hyperopia.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of -1.50 to -6.00 diopters

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of low and moderate myopia and astigmatism using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser with a modified algorithm. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-six eyes of 257 patients with myopia ranging from -1.50 to -6.00 D and astigmatism of no more than 4.00 D were included. Manifest spherical equivalent refraction, uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity were assessed at 1 month (357 eyes, 90%), 3 months (220 eyes, 56%), and 6 months (168 eyes, 42%) after LASIK. RESULTS: Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -3.60 +/- 1.27 D and mean cylinder was -1.01 +/- 1.08 D. Mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.12 +/- 0.31 D and mean cylinder was -0.19 +/- 0.33 D. At 6 months follow-up, 158 eyes (94%) had a mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia; 168 eyes (100%) were within +/- 1.00 D. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 81% (136 eyes) and 20/40 or better in 100%. Two eyes (1.2%) lost 1 line of spectacle-corrected visual acuity due to a decentered ablation. No eye lost 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. CONCLUSION: Our modified LASIK algorithm with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser resulted in safe and predictable outcomes for treatment of low and moderate amounts of myopia and astigmatism.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and hyperopia using the Lasersight 200 laser in 300 consecutive eyes

PURPOSE: To evaluate effectiveness, safety, predictability, and short-term stability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the LaserSight Compac-200 Mini excimer laser with software version 9.0, for all refractive errors. METHODS: One hundred fifty consecutive patients (300 eyes) that received bilateral LASIK for myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism were studied prospectively. A new 9.0 software version applying a modified nomogram that takes advantage of bilateral surgery was used. Follow-up at 6 months was available for 267 eyes (89%). RESULTS: Six months postoperatively, 131 eyes (96.32%) in the low to moderate myopia group (-1.00 to -5.99 D; n=136) had a spherical equivalent refraction within +/-1.00 D, and 123 eyes (90.44%) were within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia. In the high to extreme myopia group (-6.00 to -25.00 D; n=114), 97 eyes (87.08%) had a spherical equivalent refraction within +/-1.00 D and 78 eyes (68.42%) were within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia. In the hyperopia group (+1.00 to +6.00 D; n=50), 44 eyes (88%) had a postoperative spherical equivalent refraction within +/-1.00 D, and 31 eyes (62%) were within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia. Mean change in spherical equivalent refraction at 6 months was less than -0.50 D in the low to high myopia groups and -1.16 +/- 0.55 D in the extreme myopia group. At 6 months follow-up, uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 73 eyes (54%) in the low to moderate myopia groups and 21 eyes (18%) in the high to extreme myopia groups. In the hyperopia group at 6 months follow-up, uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 31 eyes (62%) and 20/40 or better in 41 eyes (82%). Only two eyes had a temporary loss of two or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity due to corneal folds that were surgically treated. Six months after LASIK, no eye had lost any lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Our modified LASIK nomogram with the 9.0 software of the LaserSight 200 excimer laser (with a larger and smoother ablation pattern) resulted in safe and effective outcomes for the treatment of low to high myopia, astigmatism, and hyperopia.     

Five-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia using the Technolas Keracor 117C excimer laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety, predictability, efficiency, and long-term stability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for spherical hyperopia. METHODS: This study was a retrospective 5-year analysis of 67 patients (125 eyes) who had LASIK for spherical hyperopia; preoperative mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction was +3.84+/-1.13 D (range +1.00 to +6.50 D) and mean astigmatism was 0.37+/-0.27 D (range 0 to 1.00 D). Preoperative spherical equivalent refraction for the low hyperopia group was +1.00 to +2.75 D; medium hyperopia group, +3.00 to +4.25 D, and high hyperopia group, +4.50 to +6.50 D. All surgeries were performed using the scanning Chiron Technolas Keracor 117C excimer laser. Uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, predictability, long-term stability of refraction, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: At 5 years after hyperopic LASIK, mean spherical equivalent refraction for the low hyperopia group was +0.48D+/-0.79 D; medium hyperopia group, +1.52+/-1.45 D; high hyperopia group C, +3.39+/-1.98 D. The percentage of eyes with a spherical equivalent refraction within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia for the low hyperopia group was 63% (37 eyes); medium hyperopia group, 42% (20 eyes); high hyperopia group, 22% (4 eyes). Eyes with chronic dry eye symptoms had a mean difference in spherical equivalent refraction from target refraction of +1.43 D compared with +0.84 D for eyes without dry eye symptoms. Five eyes (4%) lost 2 lines of BSCVA at 5 years. CONCLUSION: LASIK was safe, effective, and stable for primary hyperopia between +1.00 and +3.00 D. Higher amounts of hyperopia had poor long-term stability, especially eyes with more than +4.25 D. Chronic dry eye symptoms were associated with regression over time.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism using the Meditec MEL 70 spot scanner

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety, predictability, efficacy, and stability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for spherical hyperopia and hyperopia with astigmatism. METHODS: In this retrospective study we analyzed the results of 23 eyes of 23 patients who had LASIK for spherical hyperopia (preoperative cylinder < or = 0.75 D) and 44 eyes of 44 patients who had LASIK for hyperopia with astigmatism; (Bausch & Lomb Hansatome microkeratome with a 180-microm plate and a suction ring for a 9.5-mm flap diameter; Asclepion-Meditec MEL 70 G-scan flying spot laser with a 1.8-mm Gaussian beam). RESULTS: In Group 1 (spherical hyperopia), mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was +4.88 +/- 2.13 D (range +2.13 to +9.63 D); in Group 2 (hyperopic astigmatism), +4.33 +/- 2.15 D (range +0.50 to +9.50 D). One year after LASIK, mean spherical equivalent refraction was +0.30 +/- 0.90 D (range -0.75 to +2.50 D) in Group 1 and +0.29 +/- 1.27 D (range -3.25 to +3.25 D) in Group 2. In Group 1, 78%, and in Group 2, 42% were within +/- 0.50 D. In Group 1, no eyes lost two or more lines, and one eye (6%) lost one line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 1 year. In Group 2, one eye (4%) lost one line and one eye (4%) lost more than two lines at 1 year. Uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better was achieved in 83% (Group 1) vs. 62% (Group 2) at 1 year; these values improved to 100% vs. 71% for corrections up to +6.00 D. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK with the Meditec MEL 70 G-Scan flying spot laser seemed to be safe and effective for hyperopia and hyperopia with astigmatism for corrections up to +6.00 D. Large flap diameters are necessary to avoid epithelial ingrowth.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis after penetrating keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To determine the safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism in eyes with prior penetrating keratoplasty. METHODS: Eight eyes of 8 patients with penetrating keratoplasty had significant postoperative refractive error. Each eye received LASIK 1 year or more after penetrating keratoplasty. All were followed for 6 months or more. All patients were treated with the Chiron Technolas 217 excimer laser and the Automated Corneal Shaper microkeratome. RESULTS: Mean spherical equivalent refraction decreased from -4.50 D (range, -3.00 to -7.25 D) to -0.75 D (range, -1.50 to +0.50 D) and the mean preoperative astigmatism decreased from 3.50 D (range, 1.50 to 5.00 D) to 1.25 D (range, 0.75 to 2.00 D). Uncorrected visual acuity improved by at least two Snellen lines in all eyes. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity did not change in four eyes (50%) and improved in three eyes (37.5%). CONCLUSION: LASIK effectively reduced low and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism following penetrating keratoplasty.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism with the Technolas 117C

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correction of hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism. METHODS: Fifty-four hyperopic eyes of 35 patients with a spherical equivalent refraction between +1.00 and +6.00 D were followed for at least 12 months following LASIK. All surgery was performed with the scanning Chiron Technolas Keracor 117C excimer laser. Data on uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity, predictability, stability of refraction, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: At 12 months, the average residual refraction was +0.29 +/- 0.78 D; 83.3% of eyes (45 eyes) were in the range of +/- 1.00 D and 61.1% of eyes (33 eyes) were within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia. Fifty eyes (92.6%) had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better and 34 (63.0%) eyes had 20/20 or better. One eye (1.9%) lost two lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and two eyes (3.7%) gained two or more lines. Two patients (two eyes, 3.7%) had complaints of halos and one patient (one eye, 1.9%) had glare at 12 months after LASIK for hyperopia. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK was used to treat hyperopia from +1.00 to +6.00 D with good predictability and safety. Primary and second hyperopia require different nomograms, according to our experience.     

Combined posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens and laser in situ keratomileusis: bioptics for extreme myopia.

PURPOSE: To examine the efficacy, predictability, stability, and safety of combined posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes with extreme myopia. METHODS: We analyzed the results of 67 eyes that received a posterior chamber hydrogel-collagen plate phakic IOL (STAAR Collamer Implantable Contact Lens) and also underwent secondary LASIK for the correction of extreme myopia. Mean follow-up was 3 months after the LASIK portion of the procedure (range, 1 day to 6 mo after LASIK). RESULTS: Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -23.00 +/- 3.60 D (range, -18.75 to -35.00 D), and mean refractive cylinder was 1.50 +/- 1.20 D (range, 0 to 5.00 D). Mean spherical equivalent refraction after IOL implantation and before LASIK was -6.00 +/- 2.80 D (range, -2.00 to -14.38 D) and mean refractive cylinder 1.50 +/- 1.10 D (range, 0 to 5.00 D). Mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction at last examination after the LASIK portion of the two-part phakic IOL-LASIK procedure was -0.20 +/- 0.90 D (range, +1.75 to -5.13 D), and mean refractive cylinder was 0.50 +/- 0.50 (range, 0 to 2.25 D). Eighty-five percent (57 eyes) were within +/- 1.00 D and 67% (45 eyes) were within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia at last examination. The refractions remained stable with a statistically insignificant change (P > .05 at each interval) during follow-up. Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity at last examination was 20/20 or better in 3% (2 eyes) and 20/40 or better in 69% (46 eyes). A gain of 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity was seen in 51 eyes (76%) and no eyes lost 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity at last examination. CONCLUSION: Combined posterior chamber phakic IOL implantation with the STAAR Collamer plate lens and LASIK (bioptics) is an effective and reasonably predictable method for correcting myopia from -18 to -35 D. Gains in spectacle-corrected visual acuity were common, and results demonstrated good short-term safety and refractive stability.     

Photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin C versus LASIK in custom surgeries for myopia: a bilateral prospective randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE: To compare photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with prophylactic use of mitomycin C (MMC) and LASIK in custom surgeries for myopic astigmatism. METHODS: Eighty-eight eyes of 44 patients with a minimum estimated ablation depth of 50 microm were randomized to receive PRK with MMC 0.002% for 1 minute in one eye and LASIK in the fellow eye. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), cycloplegic refraction, slit-lamp microscopy, contrast sensitivity, specular microscopy, aberrometry, and a subjective questionnaire were evaluated. Forty-two patients completed 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Mean spherical equivalent refraction error before surgery and mean ablation depth were -3.99+/-1.20 diopters (D) and 73.09+/-14.55 microm in LASIK eyes, and -3.85+/-1.12 D and 70.7+/-14.07 microm in PRK with MMC eyes, respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity was significantly better in PRK with MMC eyes 3 months (P=.04) and 6 months (P=.01) after surgery. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and spherical equivalent refraction did not differ significantly in the groups during follow-up (P>.05). Significant haze was not observed in any PRK with MMC eye. Mean higher order aberration was lower in PRK with MMC eyes postoperatively compared with LASIK eyes (P=.01). Better contrast sensitivity was observed in PRK with MMC eyes than LASIK eyes (P<.05). The endothelial cell count did not differ significantly between groups (P=.65). In terms of visual satisfaction, PRK with MMC eyes were better rated. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy with MMC appears to be more effective than LASIK in custom surgery for moderate myopia. During 6-month follow-up, no toxic effects of MMC were evident. Long-term follow-up is necessary to attest its safety.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic anisometropia in children.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in pediatric patients with myopic anisometropia and amblyopia, and to assess the predictability, safety, and efficacy of the procedure in children. METHODS: Fourteen patients aged 7 to 12 years with myopic anisometropia and amblyopia had LASIK in the more myopic eye (14 eyes) using the Chiron Automatic Corneal Shaper and the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser. Preoperative spherical equivalent manifest refraction ranged from -4.62 to -12.50 D (mean, -7.87 D) and spectacle-corrected visual acuity ranged from 20/40 to 20/100 (median, 20/50). All patients completed a minimum follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: One year after LASIK, spherical equivalent manifest refraction ranged from 0 to -1.50 D (mean, -0.55 D). Spectacle-corrected visual acuity improved in all eyes (range, 20/20 to 20/40; median, 20/25). Six eyes (42.9%) had a postoperative spectacle-corrected visual acuity of 20/20. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 10 eyes (71.4%) (range, 20/20 to 20/70; median, 20/30). Uncorrected visual acuity exceeded preoperative spectacle-corrected visual acuity in all eyes by an average of 2 lines. There were no significant complications. CONCLUSION: LASIK was effective for correction of myopic anisometropia in this small group of children and reversed refractive amblyopia. LASIK in these children was safe, predictable, and provided good visual results.     

Nine-year follow-up of a posterior chamber phakic IOL in one eye and LASIK in the fellow eye of the same patient

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term results (9 years) of LASIK in one eye and phakic intraocular lens (implantable contact lens [ICL]) implantation in the fellow eye of the same patient. METHODS: A patient with high myopia underwent LASIK with a MEL 60 excimer laser in one eye (spherical equivalent refraction -9.75 diopters [D], 5-mm optical zone with no transition zone) and phakic intraocular lens (STAAR Collamer implantable contact lens [ICL]) implantation (spherical equivalent refraction -9.50 D) in the fellow eye. RESULTS: At 9 years postoperatively, the mean spherical equivalent refraction was -1.00 in the eye with the ICL and -1.75 D in the eye that underwent LASIK. During the first 6 postoperative months in the LASIK eye, refraction regressed, but remained stable during the remainder of follow-up. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/25 in the eye with the ICL and 20/30 in the LASIK eye, whereas best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in both eyes. Less night vision problems (glare and halos) were experienced in the eye with the ICL compared to the LASIK eye. Although the patient initially preferred the LASIK procedure, at last follow-up 9 years postoperatively, increased overall satisfaction was reported for the eye with the ICL compared to the LASIK eye. CONCLUSIONS: Nine years after treatment of high myopia with the ICL and LASIK in the same patient, better quality of vision, stability, and satisfaction score were achieved in the eye with the ICL compared to the eye that had undergone LASIK. No long-term sight-threatening complications were found during followup.     

Comparison between LASEK with mitomycin C and LASIK for the correction of myopia of -7.00 to -13.75 D

PURPOSE: To compare laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and LASIK for the correction of high myopia. METHODS: A prospective, single-masked study was conducted. Patients treated with LASEK to correct myopia > or = -7.00 diopters (D) (spherical equivalent manifest refraction) with a cylinder < or = -3.50 D (LASEK group) were compared to patients treated with LASIK (LASIK group) using the same excimer laser (Technolas 217C). Mitomycin C (MMC) 0.02% was applied for 1 minute in all LASEK-treated eyes. RESULTS: A total of 228 consecutive eyes were included in the study (114 in each group, matched for preoperative refraction). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent manifest refraction was -8.72 +/- 1.20 D in the LASEK group and -8.74 +/- 1.20 D in the LASIK group (range: -7.00 to -13.75 D) (P = .9). Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was significantly lower in LASEK eyes 1, 7, and 30 days postoperatively (P = .0001 for each comparison). No significant differences were found at 3 months postoperatively in UCVA (P = .3), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) (P = .2), or in the safety (P = .6) and efficacy (P = .8) indices. Uncorrected visual acuity was 1.0 or better in 34.2% of LASEK eyes and 44.7% of LASIK eyes. Spherical refraction was +0.25 +/- 0.6 D after LASEK and -0.06 +/- 0.5 D after LASIK (P = .0001). Sixty-eight percent of LASEK eyes and 79% of LASIK eyes were within +/- 0.50 D of intended refraction. No LASEK eye versus 7 LASIK eyes lost 2 lines of BSCVA. Eight LASEK eyes gained 2 or more lines of BSCVA versus 1 LASIK eye. CONCLUSIONS: Visual improvement after LASEK with intraoperative MMC was significantly slower than after LASIK. Visual outcomes (UCVA, BSCVA, and safety and efficacy indices) 3 months after surgery were similar with both techniques for the correction of high myopia. Ten percent more eyes after LASIK were within +/- 0.50 D of intended refraction.     

Excimer laser assisted in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia

Purpose:To evaluate hyperopic surgical correction with 6.0 mm optical zonehyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) after various refractive procedures.Setting:Buzard Eye Institute, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.Methods:This study followed 14 eyes of 14 patients who had hyperopic LASIK with a VISX Star laser. Mean follow-up was 8 months. The patients represented a variety of preoperative situations, including primary radial keratotomy (RK) (5 eyes), primary automated lamellar keratectomy (ALK) (2 eyes), primary LASIK (3 eyes), congenital hyperopia (1 eye), and combinations of ALK, RK, and LASIK. In all patients, a toroidal or “doughnut-shaped” ablation was constructed with the use of a 3.5 mm diameter soft contact lens as a blocking agent centrally with a 6.0 mm outside beam diameter.Results:Mean preoperative spherical equivalent was +1.33 diopters (D) ± 0.5 (SD)(range +0.50 to +1.88 D). The mean spherical equivalent was −0.32 ± 1.20 D (range −1.25 to +2.63 D) at 1 month postoperatively and −0.15 ± 0.60 D (range −1.13 to +1.25 D) at the last follow-up. Uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 was obtained by 13 eyes (93%). No eye lost 2 or more lines of best corrected visual acuity at last follow-up. Four eyes required a postoperative LASIK enhancement procedure to correct induced myopia. No significant complications were seen.Conclusion:Hyperopic LASIK with the technique used in this study appeared safe, predictable, and stable. It represents a simple way to add hyperopic correction to existing laser systems.     

Two-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia

PURPOSE: To evaluate excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for hyperopia and its predictability. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 100 eyes that had LASIK for hyperopia to assess predictability and long-term stability of refractive results. The Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper was used to create the flap and the Keracor 117CT Chiron-Technolas excimer laser with the plano-scan program was used to ablate all corneas. RESULTS: Mean baseline spherical equivalent manifest refraction was +4.50 +/- 1.73 D (range, +1.25 to +8.50 D). Six months after LASIK, mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction was +0.72 +/- 1.87 D (range, -1.75 to +2.50 D), at 1 year, +0.88 +/- 1.73 D (range, -1.25 to +2.50 D), and at 2 years, +0.85 +/- 1.74 D (range, -0.50 to +2.75 D). Two years after LASIK, 45 eyes (74%) were within +/-1.00 D of intended correction and within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 50 eyes (82%) at 2 years; 29 eyes (37%) saw 20/20 or better. Undercorrection occurred more frequently in eyes with preoperative keratometric power of more than 45.00 D, when ablation zones less than 6 mm were used and when higher amounts of hyperopic correction were required. CONCLUSION: LASIK with the Keracor 117CT excimer laser appears to be an effective and safe procedure to correct hyperopia. Preoperative keratometric power, amount of hyperopia, and ablation zone diameter affect the efficacy and long-term stability of the procedure.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of hyperopia from +1.25 to +5.00 diopters with the Technolas Keracor 117C laser

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy, predictability, stability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in patients with hyperopia and to evaluate the visual and refractive results of the procedure. METHODS: LASIK was performed on 85 eyes of 53 patients for correction of hyperopia, with a preoperative mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction of +3.31 +/- 0.69 D (range, +1.25 to +5.00 D) and mean refractive astigmatism of +0.91 +/- 1.06 D (range, 0 to +3.00 D). The Carriazo-Barraquer (Moria) manual microkeratome was used to create the corneal flap, and laser ablation was performed using the Technolas Keracor 117C excimer laser with an ablation zone diameter of 6.0 mm and a transition zone diameter to 9.0 mm. Follow-up was 12 months for all patients. RESULTS: Refraction was stable by 3 months after surgery. At 1 year after LASIK, the mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction was +0.43 +/- 0.57 D (range, -1.25 to +2.00 D) and refractive astigmatism was reduced to a mean of 0.36 +/- 0.30 D (range, 0 to 1.00 D). Fifty-two eyes (61.2%) had a manifest spherical equivalent refraction within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia, and 76 eyes (89.4%) were within +/- 1.00 D. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 in 21 eyes (24.7%) and 20/40 or better in 79 eyes (92.9%). Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was reduced by two lines in one eye (1.2%) and improved by two lines in five eyes (5.9%). There were no significant complications. CONCLUSION: LASIK was an effective, safe, and predictable procedure for the correction of hyperopia up to +5.00 D and hyperopic astigmatism up to +3.00 D with the Technolas Keracor 117C excimer laser. The large size of the corneal flap obtained by the Carriazo-Barraquer (Moria) manual microkeratome facilitated laser ablation entirely in the exposed corneal stromal bed.     

Confocal microscopy of corneas with an intracorneal lens for hyperopia

PURPOSE: We evaluated short-term results and confocal microscopic corneal changes following intracorneal lens implantation. METHODS: In six eyes of three patients with hyperopia between +3.00 and +6.00 diopters (D), an intrastromal hydrogel lens (Permavision, Anamed, Anaheim, Calif) was implanted. Mean baseline hyperopia was +3.90 D. Manifest refraction, uncorrected visual acuity, and spectacle-corrected visual acuity were evaluated. We also performed confocal real-time microscopy with a water immersion objective. Corneal optical sections were recorded and reviewed frame by frame. Examinations were done at months 3, 6, and 12 after intracorneal lens implantation. RESULTS: After surgery, the spherical equivalent refraction was within +/- 0.50 D in 83% (five of six eyes) at 3 months and 100% (six eyes) at 6 and 12 months. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) at 3 months was within 20/40 or better in 67% (four eyes) and in 100% (six eyes) at 6 and 12 months; no eyes had 20/20 or better UCVA at 3 and 6 months. One eye (17%) had 20/20 or better UCVA at 12 months. On confocal microscopy, one eye had an amorphous deposit adjacent to the lens and presumed fibroblastic activity in the same stromal area at 6 months, which was non-progressive up to 12 months. CONCLUSION: Intracorneal lenses may be a treatment option for correction of spherical hyperopia. Predictability must be improved but results in these six eyes were stable up to 1 year. Confocal miscroscopy confirmed biocompatibility and showed no abnormal changes, except two spots of hypercellularity in one eye.     

Clear lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for hyperopia.

PURPOSE: Current surgical options for the correction of moderate to severe hyperopia include hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), phakic intraocular lens implantation and clear lens extraction with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. We investigate the safety and efficacy of clear lens extraction with IOL implantation to correct hyperopia. METHODS: Phacoemulsification and IOL implantation was performed on 18 eyes of 10 patients. In 16 eyes, the Hoffer-Q formula was used for IOL power calculation and a single IOL was inserted; in the remaining 2 nanophthalmic eyes, the Holladay-II formula was used and two piggy-back IOLs were inserted. RESULTS: Mean preoperative spherical equivalent for distance was +6.17 D (range, +4.25 to +9.62 D). Patients were followed postoperatively for a mean of 10.5 months (range, 4 to 27 mo). Uncorrected visual acuity in all eyes was 20/50 or better with a median uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 (range, 20/30 to 20/50). Two patients lost 2 lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity; both of these patients achieved spectacle-corrected visual acuity of 20/30. CONCLUSIONS: Clear lens extraction with IOL implantation is a safe and effective procedure for the correction of moderate to severe hyperopia in the presbyopic age range.     

Wavefront-guided custom ablation for myopia using the NIDEK NAVEX laser system

PURPOSE: To determine the predictability, efficacy, safety, and stability of LASIK using custom ablation with the NIDEK Advanced Vision Excimer Laser System (NAVEX). METHODS: One hundred twenty eyes underwent LASIK for myopia using the OPDCAT algorithm. Refractive outcomes and the change in higher order aberrations, coma, and spherical aberrations were analyzed. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 6 to 18 months. RESULTS: Mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.05 diopters (D) (range: -0.92 to +0.88 D). Uncorrected visual acuity was 1 or better in 109 (91%) eyes and 1.2 or better in 47 (39%) eyes. Postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was within +/- 0.50 D of intended correction in 110 (92%) eyes. Fifty-two (43%) eyes gained 1 or more lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and no eyes lost more than 1 line of BSCVA. Higher order aberrations root-mean-square increased by 0.053 microm postoperatively. Patients with preoperative higher order aberrations > or = 0.3 microm were less likely to have induced higher order aberrations. CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront-guided OPDCAT treatments with the NIDEK NAVEX system for myopia are safe and effective with excellent visual acuity and refractive outcomes. Eyes with > or = 0.3 microm of higher order aberrations preoperatively will benefit more from OPDCAT treatment than eyes with a smaller amount of higher order aberrations.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for undercorrection after radial keratotomy.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in treating residual myopia and/or astigmatism following refractive keratotomy. METHODS: Fourteen eyes that had previously undergone radial and/or arcuate keratotomy were included. The surgeries were performed using the Chiron Automated Microkeratome and the VISX 20/20B excimer laser. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 12.64+/-5.02 months. Mean spherical equivalent refraction was reduced from -3.48+/-3.52 D preoperatively to -0.04+/-0.87 D postoperatively. At the last follow-up examination there were 8 eyes (57.1%) with a refraction within+/-0.50 D, and 10 eyes (71.4%) within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 4 eyes (28.6%) and 20/40 or better in 10 eyes (71.4%). Vector analysis of the astigmatic correction showed an index of success of 80%. There was no significant loss (> or = or =2 lines) of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. We observed interface epithelial ingrowth in one eye. CONCLUSIONS: The correction of residual myopia and/or astigmatism with LASIK in eyes with prior refractive keratotomy proved to be safe and effective. Careful preoperative evaluation may help to avoid complications such as reopening of incisions during surgery or postoperative ingrowth of epithelium beneath the corneal flap.     

Customized LASIK treatment for myopia: relationship between preoperative higher order aberrations and refractive outcome

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of preoperative higher order aberrations on postoperative sphere and cylinder outcome. METHODS: Three hundred thirty myopic eyes (mean: -3.32 +/- 1.54 diopters [D], range: -1.0 to -7.0 D) treated with customized ablation using the Technolas 217z laser (Bausch & Lomb) were followed through 6 months after LASIK. Pre- and postoperative visual acuity, higher order root mean square (RMS), third order RMS, and spherical aberration were compared to study the safety and efficacy of the treatment. The relationship between preoperative higher order aberrations and manifest refraction after LASIK was analyzed. RESULTS: Following LASIK, 91.5% of eyes obtained an uncorrected visual acuity of > or = 20/20 and 70.3% of eyes obtained 20/16 without retreatment; 99% had a best spectacle-corrected visual acuity of > or = 20/20 (75.9% of eyes were within +/- 0.50 D). Mean value of significant increase in postoperative higher order aberrations was 0.12 +/- 0.18 microm (P<.0001). Increased spherical aberration was associated with increased myopia treatment (P<.0001). Greater positive spherical aberration after LASIK was significantly correlated to postoperative hyperopia (overcorrection). Change in third order RMS was significantly correlated to change in spherical equivalent refraction among eyes with postoperative astigmatism (P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: With the Bausch & Lomb Technolas 217z Zyoptix software, treatment of higher order aberrations, especially third order (coma and trefoil) and spherical aberration, significantly improved postoperative refractive status.