Clip migration within 8 days of 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: case report

A 49-year-old woman underwent 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy of a cluster of indeterminate calcifications in the left breast. A clip was deployed accurately at the biopsy site as confirmed on mammograms obtained immediately after biopsy. The patient returned 8 days later for additional stereotactic biopsies of the left breast. Repeat mammograms revealed that the clip deployed at the original biopsy site had migrated 5 cm inferiorly.     

乳腺可疑微钙化灶金属标记夹放置的筛选条件及近期移位的影响因素

目的 探讨乳腺微钙化灶活检过程中放置金属标记夹的筛选条件和影响标记夹移位的因素.方法 108例患者中的114处乳腺微钙化灶做了11 G真空辅助立体定位活检.活检后在每一处病灶都放置了标记央,采用Gel Mark Ultra(82处)或MicroMark Ⅱ标记央(32处).所有钙化簇按照直径和(或)分布被划分成直径<10、10～20、>20 mm的单簇和多簇钙化,并判断金属夹放置的筛选条件.在乳腺X线片上直接测量标记夹和活检部位的距离,按照<10、10～20、>20 mm分成3组.结果 直径<10 mm(25例)和直径10～20 mm之间的单簇钙化(20例)中分别有88.0%(22例)和70.0%(14例)的病灶在活检后显示钙化被取净,直径>20 mm的单簇钙化(17例)没有病灶能被取净.65.8%(75/114)的标记夹准确定位,39个标记夹发生移位,其中34个(87.2%)是沿针道移位,即"手风琴效应"移位.4例患者在活检部位发生大血肿,其中只有1例标记夹能准确定位.结论 直径<20 mm的单簇钙化及多簇钙化灶在活检后都需要放置标记夹,只有直径>20 mm的单簇钙化不需要放置.影响标记夹近期移位的主要因素是"手风琴效应"和血肿.     

Comparison of rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11-gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-gauge needle and automatic gun

OBJECTIVE: The 11-gauge vacuum suction probe is an alternative to the 14-gauge needle and automatic gun for performing stereotactic core needle biopsies. This study compares rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsies that were performed with the two methods. The study also assesses the outcomes of those repeat biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred ninety-two stereotactic core needle biopsies using a 14-gauge needle and automatic gun and 354 using an 11-gauge vacuum suction probe were performed consecutively. Excluding malignancies, the number of cases requiring rebiopsy and the reasons for rebiopsy were determined for each group. The histologic diagnoses of the repeat biopsies were assessed. RESULTS: The rebiopsy rate was significantly lower with the 11-gauge vacuum suction probe (9.0%) than with the 14-gauge needle and automatic gun (14.9%) (p = .013). Significant reductions were found in cases of insufficient sampling (probe, 1.7%; needle, 4.4%; p = .042) and mammographic-pathologic discrepancy (probe, 0.8%; needle, 3.4%; p = .026). The rebiopsy rate for masses was 6.1% with the vacuum probe versus 10.7% with the 14-gauge needle (p = .12) and for calcifications was 11.6% with the vacuum probe versus 23.7% with the 14-gauge needle (p = .003). After rebiopsy, the percentage of cases in which malignancy was found was 18.5% with the vacuum probe versus 13.7% with the 14-gauge needle. On rebiopsy, the percentage of malignancies found in each category were atypical hyperplasia: probe 26.7%, needle 20.0%; insufficient sample: probe 0%, needle 9.5%; pathologist recommendation: probe 50.0%, needle 12.5%; and lobular carcinoma in situ: probe 0%, needle 100%. CONCLUSION: Use of the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device significantly decreases but does not eliminate the need for rebiopsy after stereotactic core needle biopsy. The rebiopsy rate for calcifications was significantly reduced by using the vacuum suction probe rather than the 14-gauge needle; however, the rate for masses was reduced only slightly. On rebiopsy, malignancies were found in both groups.     

Calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy: comparison of breast biopsy methods.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the usefulness of, and cost of diagnosing with, different breast biopsy methods for women with calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-nine women with calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy underwent diagnostic biopsy. Of these, 89 women had stereotactic biopsy with a 14-gauge automated needle (n = 25), 14-gauge vacuum-assisted probe (n = 17), or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted probe (n = 47); and 50 women had diagnostic surgical biopsy. Medical records were reviewed. Cost savings for stereotactic biopsy were calculated using Medicare data. RESULTS: The median number of operations was one for women who had stereotactic biopsy versus two for women who had diagnostic surgical biopsy. The likelihood of undergoing a single operation was significantly greater for women who had stereotactic rather than surgical biopsy, among all women (61/89 [68.5%] vs. 19/50 [38.0%], p < 0.001) and among women treated for breast cancer (55/77 [71.4%] vs. 6/37 [16.2%], p = 0.0000001). Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, as compared with 14-gauge automated core or 14-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, was significantly more likely to spare a surgical procedure (36/47 [76.6%] vs. 16/42 [38.1%], p = 0.0005). Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy resulted in the greatest cost reduction, yielding savings of $315 per case compared with diagnostic surgical biopsy; for women with solitary lesions, stereotactic 11-gauge biopsy decreased the cost of diagnosis by 22.2% ($334/$1502). CONCLUSION: For women with calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy, the use of stereotactic rather than surgical biopsy decreases the number of operations. Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, as compared with 14-gauge automated core or 14-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, is significantly more likely to spare a surgical procedure and has the highest cost savings.     

Metallic clip deployment during stereotactic breast biopsy: retrospective analysis

PURPOSE: To determine the visibility of presumably excised lesions on screen-film mammograms obtained after biopsy and to determine the accuracy of clip deployment on the basis of measurements obtained on routine pre- and postbiopsy mammograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred eleven cases of core-needle biopsy with clip deployment were reviewed. In each, the type of lesion, lesion location, and biopsy approach were recorded. Pre- and postbiopsy images were reviewed, and the distance between the clip and biopsy site was measured. Postbiopsy images were reviewed to determine whether the targeted lesion remained visible. RESULTS: In 62 (56%) cases, the clip was located within 5 mm of the target on postbiopsy images (craniocaudal and mediolateral), while in 18 (16%), the clip was within 6-10 mm on one projection. However, 31 (28%) clips were more than 1 cm from the target on at least one postbiopsy image. Of the 111 cases, 39 (35%) were malignant or atypical and required excision. Of these, 18 (46%) had clips at least 1 cm from the targeted lesion on at least one projection. CONCLUSION: Metallic clips placed during core-needle breast biopsy are intended to mark the biopsy site when the visible lesion is excised, in case additional biopsy is required. The data suggest that the position of metallic clips placed during stereotactic core-needle biopsy may differ substantially from the location of the biopsy site. Postbiopsy mammography should be performed in two orthogonal planes to document clip position relative to the biopsy site.     

Displacement of microcalcifications during stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy with marking clip placement: case report

A 53-year-old woman with right breast microcalcifications of intermediate concern underwent stereotactic directional vacuum-assisted biopsy with marking clip placement. Postbiopsy mammograms showed displacement of a few of the targeted microcalcifications adjacent to misplaced marker clips. Mammography following stereotactic breast biopsy is important to document the location and number of residual calcifications and to determine the adequacy and location of clip placement.     

Core needle breast biopsy in patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy: preliminary results

OBJECTIVE: We compared complication rates of core needle breast biopsy in patients with and without concurrent anticoagulation therapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Experience with 501 14-gauge and 179 11-gauge core needle breast biopsies was recorded prospectively. We performed 18 (3%) of 680 procedures on patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy. Eleven biopsies were performed in eight women treated with warfarin, one in a patient treated with heparin, and six in six women treated with aspirin. Ten biopsies were performed with sonographic guidance and a 14-gauge automated biopsy gun. Eight biopsies were performed with an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted probe and stereotactic guidance. RESULTS: Hematomas occurred in three (38%) of eight anticoagulated patients undergoing 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy, measuring 13 mm, 17 mm, and 40 mm. In patients not known to be anticoagulated, small hematomas were mammographically evident in 77 (45%) of 171 biopsies performed with an 11-gauge probe, averaging 8 mm (range, 2-17 mm); only 13 (8%) of 171 had hematomas larger than 10 mm. Small hematomas, averaging 6 mm (range, 2-12 mm) were evident mammographically in 45 (45%) of 100 stereotactic biopsies using a 14-gauge automated biopsy gun; three (3%) experienced hematomas larger than 10 mm. A 10-mm hematoma was evident during one (10%) of the 10 biopsies performed in patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy under sonographic guidance using a 14-gauge automated biopsy gun; small hematomas (mean, 10 mm) were noted during seven (2%) of 391 corresponding sonographically guided biopsies in patients not undergoing anticoagulation therapy. CONCLUSION: No patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy experienced clinically important complications; preliminary results suggest rates of hematoma formation similar to those in the control group. As such, discontinuing anticoagulation medication before core needle breast biopsy may be unnecessary when the need for biopsy is urgent.     

Scar formation after stereotactic vacuum-assisted core biopsy of benign breast lesions

AIM: To evaluate scar formation of impalpable breast lesions with benign histological outcome using stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted core biopsy (VACB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and ten lesions with benign histology for which follow-up mammograms were available, were assessed for scar formation at the biopsy site. All biopsies were performed using stereotactic VACB with 11-gauge needle. The incidence of post-biopsy scar formation and the number of specimens removed were determined. RESULTS: In 4.3% (9/210) of the lesions for which a biopsy was performed with 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted technique, the follow-up mammogram revealed a scar formation. Of these, six were minimal scars, two were moderate scars and one was a marked scar. Minimal and moderate scars were diagnosed on imaging only. However, the case with marked scar formation required tissue diagnosis to rule out malignancy. CONCLUSION: Although uncommon, scar formation can be seen in the follow-up mammograms after percutaneous breast biopsies. It is important that the radiologist interpreting follow-up mammograms is aware of the features of this lesion and its relationship to the biopsy procedure.     

Clip or marker migration 5-10 weeks after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: report of two cases

Two women, aged 50 and 51 years, underwent stereotactic, 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy from the cranial approach of small lesions in the upper outer quadrant of the right breast with removal of lesions that were detected with mammography. Postbiopsy mammograms showed the metal clip or marker at the biopsy sites in both patients. Histologic analysis of both lesions indicated atypical hyperplasia. Mammograms obtained prior to surgical excision showed caudal z-axis migration of the clip or marker to be 6.5 cm at 5 weeks and 4.5 cm at 10 weeks, respectively. By ignoring the clip or marker that had migrated to an inaccurate location and by using internal and external breast landmarks to guide presurgical excision needle localization, the biopsy sites were successfully excised in both patients.     

11-gauge vacuum assisted directional biopsy of breast calcifications, using upright stereotactic guidance

To assess the use of a prototype vacuum assisted biopsy device on a standard upright mammography unit, using a slightly modified digital stereotactic add-on component. A group comprised of 42 sequential patients, who had been recalled from an asymptomatic mammographic screening programme, were studied. All 42 were recalled for assessment of small clusters of microcalcification, graded as indeterminate. Group 1 (21 patients) were biopsied using 14-gauge automated large core needle biopsy. Group 2 (21 patients) were biopsied using 11-gauge vacuum assisted biopsy. Both groups had mammographic guidance on the same upright mammographic unit (Siemens 3000), with Opdima Digital Stereotactic add-on. A total of 86% of specimen radiographs in Group 2 patients (vacuum assisted biopsy) showed successful sampling of the calcifications, compared to 62% of Group 1 patients (14-gauge automated large core biopsies). This study shows that vacuum assisted biopsy is possible using upright stereotactic mammography units. The technique shows promise as a biopsy tool, offering larger cores compared to 14-gauge automated large core biopsy, while requiring less space and lower purchase price compared to dedicated prone biopsy tables. The technique also offers access to biopsy in patients with posterior lesions and for patients who cannot tolerate prone positioning.     

Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with stereotactic core needle biopsy: can invasion be predicted?

PURPOSE: To determine whether mammographic or histologic features can be used to predict which cases diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) without invasion by means of stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) will have invasive disease at surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1992 to March 1999, DCIS without invasion was diagnosed by means of SCNB in 59 patients. Seventeen (29%) were found to have invasive disease after surgery. The underestimation rate for SCNB was compared with that obtained by means of open surgical biopsy. Mammographic and histologic features of cases with and those without invasion were compared. RESULTS: All patients had calcifications on mammograms. There was no significant difference (P: =.26) between the underestimation rate for SCNB with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device and that for open surgical biopsy. No statistically significant differences between cases with and those without invasion were seen in patient age, mean number of core specimens, level of suspicion, size of lesion, distribution and morphology of the calcifications, presence of an associated mass or density, subtype of DCIS, nuclear grade, or presence of necrosis or desmoplasia. CONCLUSION: Mammographic and histologic features cannot be used reliably to predict cases that are underestimated with SCNB. However, SCNB with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device was as reliable as open surgical biopsy for diagnosing DCIS without invasion.     

Clip migration after 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: case report

A 68-year-old woman underwent stereotactic biopsy of a small cluster of calcifications. The post-biopsy mammograms showed the biopsy-marking clip to be located correctly at the biopsy site. Follow-up mammograms 1 year later showed that the clip migrated to another quadrant of the breast. Findings in this case demonstrate that at long-term follow-up a biopsy-marking clip may not be accurately marking the biopsy site.     

Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies.

One hundred two patients with mammographically suspicious, nonpalpable lesions underwent stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun and an automated 14-gauge cutting needle. After biopsy, a localization wire was placed and surgical biopsy performed. There was agreement of the histologic results from the gun biopsy and the surgical biopsy specimens in 98 cases (96%), including 22 of 23 carcinomas (96%) (kappa = 0.936). The gun biopsy yielded findings that led to the correct diagnosis in two cases involving lesions that were missed at surgical biopsy; two lesions found at surgery were missed at gun biopsy. The results of this study suggest that the use of 14-gauge needles improves agreement between surgical and needle core biopsy findings and that stereotactic biopsy with an automated needle and gun can be an acceptable alternative to surgical biopsy in women with mammographically suspicious breast lesions.     

Digital imaging improves upright stereotactic core biopsy of mammographic microcalcifications

AIM: This comparative study was carried out to assess the effect of using digital images compared to conventional film-screen mammography on the accuracy of core biopsy of microcalcifications using upright stereotactic equipment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The biopsy results from a consecutive series of 104 upright stereotactic 14-gauge core biopsies performed with conventional X-ray (Group A) were compared with 40 biopsies carried out using stereotaxis with digital imaging (Group B). In all cases specimen radiography was performed and analysed for the presence of calcifications. Pathological correlation was then carried out with needle and surgical histology. RESULTS: The use of digital add-on equipment increased the radiographic calcification retrieval rate from 55 to 85% (P < 0.005). The absolute sensitivity of core biopsy in pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) cases rose from 34 to 69% (P < 0.03), with the complete sensitivity increasing from 52 to 94% (P < 0.005). For DCIS with or without an invasive component the absolute sensitivity rose from 41 to 67% (P = 0.052), while the complete sensitivity was 59% before and 86% after the introduction of digital imaging (P < 0.04). CONCLUSION: Digital equipment improves the performance of upright stereotactic core biopsy of microcalcifications, giving a significantly increased success rate in accurately obtaining calcifications. This leads to an improvement in absolute and complete sensitivity of core biopsy when diagnosing DCIS.     

Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun

One hundred three patients underwent stereotactic breast biopsy with an 18-, 16-, or 14-gauge cutting needle and a biopsy gun. After biopsy, a localization wire was placed and surgical biopsy performed. There was agreement of the histologic results in 89 cases (87%) including 14 of 16 cancers (87%) (kappa = 0.806). The gun biopsy yielded the correct diagnosis in four cases involving a lesion (including one cancer) that was missed at the surgical biopsy. Nine cases in which the lesion was missed at gun biopsy can be related to insufficient needle size, the greater difficulty in using one of the two stereotactic devices, and early inexperience with the technique. A 14-gauge needle was used in the last 29 biopsies, the results of which agreed with the surgical pathologic findings in 28 cases (97%). With greater experience, stereotactic-guided large-gauge automated percutaneous biopsy may prove to be an acceptable alternative to surgical biopsy in women with breast masses suspected at mammography.     

Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a validation study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to determine the false-negative rate of stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy in a validation study of lesions that had subsequent surgical excision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of 318 lesions that underwent stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy and subsequent surgical excision. A false-negative case was defined as a pathologically proven cancer in which stereotactic biopsy yielded benign results without atypia. Medical records, imaging studies, and histologic findings were reviewed. RESULTS: False-negative findings were encountered at stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy in 3.3% (7/214) of pathologically proven cancers. False-negative findings occurred in 3.5% (4/115) of malignant calcification lesions versus 3.0% (3/99) of malignant masses (p = 1.0). The seven false-negative findings included five Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 5 lesions that yielded benign results at biopsy, one BI-RADS category 4 mass that benign breast tissue, and one BI-RADS category 4 cluster of calcifications in which no calcifications were retrieved. The false-negative rate was 10.0% (6/60) for radiologists who performed 15 or fewer previous stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy procedures versus 0.6% (1/154) for radiologists who performed more than 15 previous stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy procedures (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy had a false-negative rate of 3.3% that diminished to 0.6% with experience. All false-negative findings could be prospectively identified because of failure to sample calcifications or imaging-histologic discordance.     

Stereotactic breast biopsy with an 8-gauge,directional, vacuum-assisted probe: initial experience

This study was prospectively conducted to assess the feasibility, safety and accuracy of an 8-G directional vacuum-assisted biopsy (DVAB) probe in the diagnostic management of nonpalpable breast lesions (NPBL). Of 170 planned procedures which were indicated for investigation of BI-RADS category-3 to category-5 lesions, 153 were performed in 138 consecutive patients. The probe was targeted by the stereotactic unit of a prone table (United States Surgical Corporation, Norwalk, Conn.; and Lorad, Danbury, Conn.). Four to 18 (mean 8) core specimens were obtained for each lesion. In case of complete removal of the lesion, a localizing clip was deployed at the biopsy site. Adequate material for histopathologic examination was obtained in all cases (100%). Four of 138 (3%) patients experienced mild hematomas. We observed 15 of 39 failures (38%) to place the localizing clips. Thirteen of 153 (8%) procedures were inconclusive and required reintervention. Following DVAB, 42 of 138 (30%) patients underwent surgery. Subject to incomplete follow-up of the entire cohort, we observed no false-positive and one false-negative diagnosis. These preliminary results suggest that DVAB using an 8-G probe are feasible, safe and accurate. In our experience, clip placement was problematic. It is probable that increasing the dimensions of DVAB will only be relevant in a limited number of clinical situations, primarily the desire to obtain complete radiologic resections of the target abnormality.     

Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to determine the frequency with which stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy obviated a surgical procedure and to calculate cost savings attributable to that biopsy method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 200 consecutive solitary nonpalpable lesions on which stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy was performed. Cost savings were calculated using Medicare reimbursements. Mammograms, histologic findings, and medical records were reviewed. RESULTS: Stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy obviated a surgical procedure in 151 (76%) of 200 lesions, including 112 (73%) of 154 calcific lesions and 39 (85%) of 46 masses. Reasons for not obviating a surgical procedure in 49 lesions (25%) included recommendation for surgical biopsy in 35 lesions (18%), small carcinomas treated by excision in 10 lesions (5%), and histologic underestimation in four lesions (2%). Stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy decreased the cost of diagnosis by S264 per case, a 20% ($264/$1289) decrease in the cost of diagnosis compared with surgical biopsy. Of 200 lesions that had stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy, 106 (53%) would not have been amenable to 14-gauge automated core biopsy because of their small size, their superficial location, or inadequate breast thickness. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy obviated a surgical procedure in 76% of lesions, yielding a 20% decrease in cost of diagnosis compared with surgical biopsy. Although savings per case are modest, 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy expands the spectrum of lesions amenable to stereotactic biopsy, increasing cost savings in the population.     

Benign breast lesions: minimally invasive vacuum-assisted biopsy with 11-gauge needles patient acceptance and effect on follow-up imaging findings

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient acceptance of stereotactic or ultrasonographically (US) guided directional vacuum-assisted 11-gauge needle biopsy of breast lesions and short- and long-term changes at mammography and US resulting from the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 91 benign lesions that had been sampled at either stereotactic or US-guided directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy performed with 11-gauge needles, clinical, mammographic, and US changes were evaluated 1 week after biopsy; 6-month follow-up findings were available for 74 lesions. The subjective outcome of the procedure and patient satisfaction were assessed on the basis of a patient-completed questionnaire that incorporated a multistage scoring system. Statistical analysis of scores for condition for both biopsy methods was performed with the chi2 test. RESULTS: Adverse events occurred during the procedure in four patients. Clinically visible hematomas were observed at 1-week follow-up in 79% of patients. Densities were observed on mammograms in 46% of patients 1 week after biopsy; hematomas with a maximum diameter of 2 cm were seen on sonograms in 74%. Six months after biopsy, mammography revealed discrete architectural changes in one case. No abnormalities were found at 6-month follow-up US. Fifteen patients had various complaints during the procedure; six reported feeling constrained during the first few days after biopsy, and one patient was not satisfied with the cosmetic result. No patient reported a retrospective preference for surgical biopsy instead of directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. Analysis of scores for the stereotactic and US-guided methods revealed a significant difference (P <.001) in favor of the stereotactic method for condition during biopsy, while scores for condition in the first days after biopsy were more equally distributed between the two methods (P =.386). CONCLUSION: Directional vacuum-assisted 11-gauge needle biopsy of the breast is well accepted by patients and rarely produces changes that may alter the mammographic or sonographic appearance of the breast at 6-month follow-up.     

Stereotactic core breast biopsy of malignant calcifications: diagnostic yield of cores with and cores without calcifications on specimen radiographs

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare core biopsy diagnosis with final diagnosis at surgical excision in cores with and cores without calcification on specimen radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred thirteen consecutive patients underwent vacuum-assisted 11- or 14-gauge needle stereotactic core biopsy for calcifications with malignant histologic results in core samples from 116 lesions. For each lesion, calcification was identified in at least one core at specimen radiography. Cores with and those without calcification seen on magnified specimen radiographs were separately submitted to and reported on by pathologists, who obtained additional levels in cores with calcification. All patients underwent surgical excision of the lesion area within 7 weeks. The pathologic diagnosis in core samples with and those without calcification on specimen radiographs was compared with final diagnosis at surgical excision. Fisher exact test was used for all chi(2) determinations of statistical significance. RESULTS: Cores with calcification on specimen radiographs were more likely to enable a final diagnosis of malignancy than were cores without calcification (98 [84%] vs 82 [71%] of 116; P =.02). Cores without calcification were significantly more likely to cause a diagnosis of cancer to be missed than were those with calcification on specimen radiographs (13 [11%] vs one [1%] of 116; P <.001). Underestimates of malignancy were more frequent in 14- than in 11-gauge specimens (11 [18%] of 60 vs six [10%] of 56; P =.30). Regardless of needle size, there was no significant difference in underestimation of malignancy between cores with and without radiographically evident calcification (17 [15%] vs 21 [18%] of 116; P =.60). CONCLUSION: Specimen radiography is essential to document calcification retrieval. Cores without radiographically demonstrated calcification may fail to show a malignant lesion. Separate identification of calcium-containing cores may assist the pathologist, who can more thoroughly evaluate these cores with additional levels of section.