Abdominal aortic aneurysm: results of a family study

Data pertaining to abdominal aortic aneurysm among first-degree relatives of 91 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm are presented. The percentage of families with at least one affected first-degree relative of the proband (multiplex families) was 15.4%. In 21.4% of multiplex families parent-offspring transmission of abdominal aortic aneurysm was noted; in the remaining families only siblings were affected. The mean age at onset among probands was 67.3 years; that among all affected was 67.4 years. No statistically significant difference in the mean ages at onset between genders was noted. Among affected siblings of probands, the sex ratio, male:female, was 1.33:1, which is not significantly different from 1:1. The relative risk of developing an abdominal aortic aneurysm was 3.97 for fathers, 4.03 for mothers, 9.92 for brothers, and 22.93 for sisters.     

Are familial abdominal aortic aneurysms different?

A 9-year prospective study of 542 consecutive patients undergoing operation by one of the authors for abdominal aortic aneurysms was undertaken to define the incidence, clinical behavior, and anatomic characteristics of familial abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eighty-two (15.1%) patients having surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms were found to have a first-degree relative with an aneurysm, as compared to nine (1.8%) of a control group of 500 patients of similar age and sex without aneurysmal disease (p less than 0.001). Detailed analysis was next performed of the pedigree charts of patients with a positive family history of aneurysm who underwent repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms by all authors over the 9-year study period. This review identified a total study population of 86 families with 209 first-degree relatives with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Clinical and anatomic features of this familial group were compared to those of 460 patients operated on for abdominal aortic aneurysms who had no family history of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Patients with familial abdominal aortic aneurysms were more likely to be women (35% vs 14%), and men with familial abdominal aortic aneurysms tended to be about 5 years younger than the women. There was no significant difference between the patients with nonfamilial and familial abdominal aortic aneurysms in anatomic extent of aneurysmal disease, multiplicity of aneurysms, associated occlusive disease, or blood type. There was a history of aneurysm rupture in 35 of 86 (40.7%) families with familial abdominal aortic aneurysms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Peripheral aneurysms and arteriomegaly: Is there a familial pattern?

Purpose: Studies have shown that 11% to 18% of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) have a first-degree relative with an AAA. A familial pattern among patients with peripheral arterial aneurysms and arteriomegaly has not been reported. The objective of this study was to examine familial patterns among patients with peripheral arterial aneurysm and arteriomegaly and compare them with patterns among patients with AAA. Methods: Pedigrees were constructed for first-degree relatives of patients who received the diagnosis of peripheral arterial aneurysm, arteriomegaly, or AAA from 1988 through 1996. The presence of aneurysms and risk factors was confirmed for patients and relatives by means of telephone interviews and review of hospital and physician records. Results: Seven hundred three first-degree relatives older than 50 years were contacted for 140 probands with peripheral arterial aneurysm, AAA, or arteriomegaly. There were differences in risk factors for hernia and diabetes mellitus among the probands with peripheral arterial aneurysm, AAA, or arteriomegaly but none for relatives. Patients with peripheral arterial aneurysm (n = 40) had a 10% (4/40) familial incidence rate of an aneurysm, patients with AAA (n = 86) had a 22% (19/86) familial incidence rate, and patients with arteriomegaly (n = 14) had a 36% (5/14) familial incidence rate. AAA (24/28, or 86%) was the aneurysm diagnosed most commonly among first-degree relatives. Most aneurysms (85%) occurred among men. Conclusion: There appears to be a gradation of familial patterns from peripheral arterial aneurysm to AAA to arteriomegaly among patients with degenerative aneurysmal disease, and there appears to be a predominance among men. Relatives of patients with any of the 3 lesions—peripheral arterial aneurysm, AAA, arteriomegaly—most frequently have AAA. Relatives of patients with AAA, peripheral arterial aneurysm, or arteriomegaly may be screened by means of a physical examination for peripheral aneurysmal disease. Screening by means of ultrasound examination of the aorta should be limited to first-degree relatives of patients with aortic aneurysms or arteriomegaly. (J Vasc Surg 1998;28:599-605.)     

Multifactorial inheritance of abdominal aortic aneurysm

The possible genetic predisposition to abdominal aortic aneurysm was investigated by recording the family history from 60 consecutive patients presenting for aneurysm repair. Twenty patients, age 63.2 +/- 9.3 years, had at least one first degree relative with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Thirty six patients, age 69.6 +/- 6.3 years, knew of no aortic aneurysm amongst first degree relatives and four patients could not give a full family history. A total of 25 among 320 first degree relatives (8%) or 14 amongst 192 siblings (7%) had an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Both the younger age of presentation (P less than 0.01) and the concentration of women amongst those with a positive family history argue for multifactorial inheritance of abdominal aortic aneurysm, with the genetic component calculated as approximately 70%. These same factors suggest that it might be worthwhile screening for aneurysmal disease the sibling smokers of female and younger male probands.     

An evaluation of new methods of expressing aortic aneurysm size: relationship to rupture.

The diameter of aortic aneurysms were standardized to measures of patient size and normal aortic size in an effort to define indexes that might be more predictive of aneurysm rupture than raw aneurysm diameter alone. Normal aortic diameters were measured in 100 patients undergoing abdominal CT scans for other reasons, and an average infrarenal aortic diameter of 2.10 +/- 0.05 cm was observed. Normal aortic diameter was dependent on both age and sex, ranging from 1.71 +/- 0.06 cm in women below age 40 years to 2.85 +/- 0.04 cm in men above age 70 years. Overall, 11 (5.1%) of the ruptures occurred in aneurysms less than 5 cm in diameter, and four (1.9%) occurred in aneurysms less than 4.0 cm in diameter. When the CT scans of 100 patients undergoing elective aneurysm resection were compared with those of 36 patients with ruptured aneurysms, no threshold diameter value accurately discriminated between the two groups. However, standardization of the aneurysm diameter to the transverse diameter of the third lumbar vertebral body as an index of patient body size produced an accurate predictor of rupture when a threshold ratio of 1.0 was used. No aneurysm ruptured below this ratio, but 29% of elective aneurysms were smaller than the vertebral body diameter. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis confirmed the superiority of the aneurysm to vertebral body diameter ratio as a discriminator of ruptured aneurysms. It appears that aneurysm diameter alone is not sufficiently predictive of rupture to be used as the sole indication for elective resection.     

The value of screening in siblings of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a large group of siblings of Australian AAA patients to determine if screening in this group is justified. METHODS: 1254 siblings of 400 index AAA patients were identified and offered aortic ultrasound screening. An age and sex matched control group was recruited from patients having abdominal CT scans for non-vascular indications. AAA was defined by an infrarenal aortic diameter of > or =3 cm or a ratio of the infrarenal to suprarenal aortic diameter of > or =2.0. A ratio of 1.0-1.5 was considered normal, and a ratio of >1.5 to <2.0 was considered ectatic. Aortic enlargement was defined as ectasia or aneurysm. RESULTS: 276 (22%) siblings could be contacted and agreed to screening or had previously been diagnosed with AAA. All 118 controls had normal diameter aortas. 55/276 siblings had previously been diagnosed with AAA. The remaining 221 siblings underwent ultrasound screening. Overall, 30% (84/276) had enlarged aortas (5% ectasia, 25% aneurysmal); 43% of male siblings (64/150) and 16% of females siblings (20/126). The incidence was 45% in brothers of female index patients, 42% in brothers of male patients, 23% in sisters of female patients, and 14% in sisters of male index patients. CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of aortic enlargement of 30% found in this study warrants a targeted screening approach with ultrasound for all siblings of patients with AAA. A similar targeted approach for screening of the children of AAA patients would also seem advisable.     

French women from multiplex abdominal aortic aneurysm families should be screened

BACKGROUND: Multiplex abdominal aortic aneurysm families (MAAAFs) (> or =1 subject plus the proband) represent 1% to 34% of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), but the percentage in France is unknown. METHOD: The MAAAF rate was retrospectively defined by analysis of 3 groups: 72 of 104 consecutive individuals undergoing AAA surgery during 1994, 24 of 53 women and 35 of 76 men with giant (> or =9 cm) AAA operated on during 1986 to 1994. MAAAF characteristics were determined based on 10 families issued from these 3 groups and 34 others identified nationwide. Data were obtained from a standardized questionnaire for probands and relatives, detailed pedigrees of each family, and computed tomography (CT) scans without contrast medium of the aorta and lower limb arteries for first-degree relatives > or =40-year-of age. RESULTS: The MAAAF rate was 4.2% for the consecutive-surgery patients (proband M/F ratio, 17:1; mean age at surgery, 68.5 +/- 8.5 years). CT detected no additional AAA among them (screened individuals M/F ratio, 0.63; mean age, 54.0 +/- 11.2 years). MAAAF rates were 8.3% and 14.3% for the women's and giant-AAA groups with CT screening, respectively. Characteristics were investigated in 104 affected subjects from 44 MAAAFs: female relatives were more often affected than probands (P < 0.025). Compared with men, affected female relatives were significantly older at diagnosis and surgery (P < 0.05 and P < 0.02, respectively), as were affected women (P < 0.02 and P < 0.01, respectively). CT scan screening identified significantly more AAA and abdominal aortic dilatations among the 44 MAAAFs than the consecutive-surgery group (5 and 4, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although the MAAAF rate seems low in France, women from MAAAF were affected more often and later, suggesting that they should be screened.     

The incidence of small abdominal aortic aneurysms and the change in normal infrarenal aortic diameter: implications for screening.

AIM: to study the incidence of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), and to investigate what proportion of normal infrarenal aortic diameters (IAD) expand with age. METHODS: longitudinal follow-up in a population-based aneurysm screening programme. The infrarenal aortic diameter (IAD) was measured by ultrasound. A second scan was performed in subjects with a normal aorta after an average of 5.5 years. RESULTS: data were analysed from 4072 subjects, 464 with a small AAA and 3608 with a normal aorta. The infrarenal aorta expanded in 15% of subjects, but significant growth (>5 mm) occurred in only 7%. Age and initial diameter were independent predictors for aortic dilatation. The effect of diameter at first screen was non-linear. The relative risk for expansion increased dramatically for IADs over 2.5 cm (test for departure of trend: chi2=52, p<0.0001). The effect of age was also non-linear, the risk of expansion was highest in the 60-69 year old age group; test for departure of trend (chi2=13, p=0.002). The incidence of new aneurysms was 3.5 per 1000 person-years (py) (95% CI: 2.8-4.4). The highest incidence of new aneurysms was found in the 60 to 69 year old age group. CONCLUSION: only a small proportion of the population is prone to aortic dilatation. Patients over 70 with an IAD <2.5 cm can be discharged from follow-up.     

Variation of infrarenal aortic diameter: A necropsy study

PURPOSE: To determine anatomicomorphological changes in the infrarenal portion of the abdominal aorta, we performed 645 dissections of the segment in corpses undergoing necropsy. METHODS: The aortas were removed from the corpses with a surgical technique; by means of a device that we designed, the external diameter of the artery was measured after luminal pressure was reestablished. This way, it was possible to avoid underestimation of the arterial diameter postmortem. The influence of age, sex, body size, arterial hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and coronary disease on the aortic diameter and the influence of different degrees of sclerosis on the infrarenal aorta wall were analyzed. Considering the diameters, aortas were regarded as "normal" when they did not present any ectasia, arteriomegaly, aneurysm, or hypoplasia. RESULTS: The sample involved 645 subjects whose ages ranged from 19 to 97 years (mean age, 55.8 years). Of the 645 subjects, 65.5% (423) were men, 34.5% (222) were women, 81% (523) were white, and 19% (122) were of another race. The diameters of arteries showing no anomalous dilatation (ectasis, arteriomegaly, or aneurysm) varied according to subject age, sex, body length, and the degree of atherosclerosis on the aorta wall (P <.01). Aortic diameters of those subjects with arterial hypertension, coronary disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were compared with the aortic diameters of control subjects, and significant differences were not shown (P >.05). Twenty-nine aneurysms were found (4.5% prevalence). Four were ruptured aneurysms, and all occurred in aortas with diameters larger than 5.0 cm. CONCLUSION: The infrarenal aortic diameter enlarges with aging, and this enlargement occurs earlier in men than in women. Those subjects who had a longer body length and advanced sclerosis on the aorta wall had larger aortic diameters. There was a high prevalence of infrarenal aneurysms (4.5%), with rupture found solely in aortas with diameters larger than 5.0 cm.     

Familial abdominal aortic aneurysms: collection of 233 multiplex families

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated a large number of families in which at least two individuals were diagnosed with abdominal aortic aneurysms to identify the relationship of the affected relatives to the proband. Subjects and Methods: Families for the study were recruited through various vascular surgery centers in the United States, Finland, Belgium, Canada, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Kingdom and through our patient recruitment website (www.genetics.wayne.edu/ags). RESULTS: We identified 233 families with at least two individuals diagnosed with abdominal aortic aneurysms. The families originated from nine different nationalities, but all were white. There were 653 aneurysm patients in these families, with an average of 2.8 cases per family. Most of the families were small, with only two affected individuals. There were, however, six families with six, three with seven, and one with eight affected individuals. Most of the probands (82%) and the affected relatives (77%) were male, and the most common relationship to the proband was brother. Most of the families (72%) appeared to show autosomal recessive inheritance pattern, whereas in 58 families (25%), abdominal aortic aneurysms were inherited in autosomal dominant manner, and in eight families, the familial aggregation could be explained by autosomal dominant inheritance with incomplete penetrance. In the 66 families where abdominal aortic aneurysms were inherited in a dominant manner, 141 transmissions of the disease from one generation to another were identified, and the male-to-male, male-to-female, female-to-male, and female-to-female transmissions occurred in 46%, 11%, 32%, and 11%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study supports previous studies about familial aggregation of abdominal aortic aneurysms and suggests that first-degree family members, male relatives, in particular, are at increased risk. No single inheritance mode could explain the occurrence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the 233 families studied here, suggesting that abdominal aortic aneursyms are a multifactorial disorder with multiple genetic and environmental risk factors.     

The impact of walking impairment,cardiovascular risk factors,and comorbidity on quality of life in patients with intermittent claudication

PURPOSE: This study assessed the cardiovascular disease, perioperative results, and survival after surgical abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in young patients (< or = 50 years) compared with randomly selected older patients who also underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: We reviewed hospital records to identify young and randomly selected control patients (3 for each young patient, > or = 65 years, matched for year of operation) with degenerative (atherosclerotic) abdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing repair between Jan 1, 1988, and Mar 31, 2000. Patients with congenital aneurysms, pseudoaneurysms, aortic dissections, post-coarctation dilations, aortic infection, arteritis, or aneurysms isolated to the thoracic aorta were excluded. Mortality data and cause of death were obtained from medical records and the National Death Index RESULTS: Among 1168 patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs, 19 young patients (1.6%) and 57 control patients were identified. The mean age was 48.4 years in the young group and 72.2 years in the control group. There were no differences in sex or race between the two groups. When comparing existing cardiovascular disease between the groups, there were no differences in the incidence of earlier coronary revascularization (26% vs 16%) or non-cardiac vascular surgery (5% vs 9%), but aneurysms were more commonly symptomatic in young patients (53% vs 21%; P <.01). Aneurysmal disease was limited to the infrarenal aorta in similar proportions of patients (89% vs 88%). No statistically significant differences were seen in the incidence of perioperative deaths (16% young vs 9% control; P =.40) or postoperative complications (37% young vs 26% control; P =.38). The estimated survival rate of the young group was not different from that of the control group (3-year survival rate, 73% vs 69%; P =.32) or the entire cohort of patients (older than 50 years; n = 1101) who underwent repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms during the study period (3-year survival 73% vs 75%; P =.63) CONCLUSION: After abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, young patients had perioperative results and follow-up mortality rates similar to those of control patients. Cardiovascular disease was the predominant cause of death after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the young patients. When compared with an age older than 50 years at the time of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, young age alone was not associated with increased survival.     

Probability of rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm after an unrelated operative procedure: a prospective study

It has been assumed by some authors that patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms may be at increased risk of rupture after unrelated operations. From July 1986 to December 1989, 33 patients (29 men, 4 women) with a known abdominal aortic aneurysm underwent 45 operations. Twenty-eight patients had an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, and five patients had a thoracoabdominal aneurysm. The abdominal aortic aneurysm ranged in transverse diameter from 3.0 to 8.5 cm (average 5.6 cm). Twenty-seven patients underwent a single operation, and six patients had two or more (range of 1 to 6). Operations performed were abdominal (13); cardiothoracic (9); head/neck (2); other vascular (11); urologic (7); amputation (2); breast (1). General anesthesia was used in 29 procedures, spinal/epidural in 6, and regional/local in 10. One postoperative death occurred from cardiopulmonary failure. One patient died of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm at 20 days after coronary artery bypass (1/33 patients [3%]; 1/45 operations [2%]). Fourteen patients had repair of their abdominal aortic aneurysm at a later date, an average of 18 weeks after operation. Four patients had abdominal aortic aneurysm considered too small to warrant resection (average 3.6 cm). Four patients were considered at excessive risk for elective repair. The five thoracoabdominal aneurysm were not repaired. Four patients are awaiting repair. During this same 40-month period, two other patients, not known to have an abdominal aortic aneurysm, died of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after another operative procedure, at 21 days and 77 days. All three ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms were 5.0 cm or greater in transverse diameter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Abdominal aortic aneurysms in Western Australia: descriptive epidemiology and patterns of rupture

All abdominal aortic aneurysms presenting to hospitals and coroners in Western Australia over an 11-year period (January 1971 to December 1981) have been reviewed. A total of 1237 abdominal aortic aneurysms were found. After age and sex standardization it was apparent that the prevalence of diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms had increased from 74.8 per 100 000 to 117.2 per 100 000 for men over 55 years of age (increase of 56.7 per cent) and from 17.5 per 100 000 to 33.9 per 100 000 for women over 55 years of age (increase of 93.7 per cent) during this period. One hundred and twenty-three patients were identified by coroner's autopsy after sudden death from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in whom there had been no previous diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Between 1971 to 1981, 478 patients underwent surgery; 225 had elective resection of their aneurysm with a 4.0 per cent fatality rate, and 253 had emergency operations with a 31.2 per cent fatality rate. Seasonal variations contributing to the date of emergency presentation or death from rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms indicated a possible influence of colder weather upon rupture. It is hoped that the information provided in this paper will be of use to surgeons and physicians involved in health care planning for similar populations.     

Pathogenesis of acquired aneurysms of the abdominal aorta

The incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm has recently increased. There is still no accurate definition of abdominal aortic aneurysm. The diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysms is the only factor permitting evaluation of the risk of rupture of aneurysms whose growth remains unpredictable. Abdominal aortic aneurysm is a multi-factorial disease associated with aortic aging and atheroma. It differs from stenotic disease by the intensity of degenerative or destructive phenomena in the media. Particular hemodynamic conditions in the infrarenal abdominal aorta seem to enhance the development of aneurysm at this level. While certain constitutional anomalies of the extracellular matrix of proteins seem to enhance the development of abdominal aortic aneurysm, protease activity of as yet undetermined origin also seems to play a prominent role. Family cases of abdominal aortic aneurysms have been reported but the mechanisms responsible remain to be determined. Several genetic markers have been suggested. The most reliable marker of aortic aneurysm is arteriomegaly.     

Morphologic changes and outcome following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair as a function of aneurysm size

HYPOTHESIS: Small infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms have a more favorable clinical and morphologic outcome compared with medium and large abdominal aortic aneurysms following endovascular aneurysm repair(EVAR). DESIGN: A prospective clinical series of 206 patients undergoing elective EVAR between 1996 and 2001. SETTING: A tertiary care academic health center. PATIENTS: Patients were grouped according to aneurysm size: small (<50 mm), medium (50-60 mm), and large (>60 mm). INTERVENTIONS: Primary EVAR and secondary procedures to secure fixation of the stent graft and surgical conversions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Aneurysm diameter, endoleaks, and long-term morphologic changes were analyzed postoperatively with 3-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomographic angiograms. RESULTS: Groups were similar in age, comorbidities, and follow-up (mean +/- SD, 32.1 +/- 11.8 months). There were 30 small aneurysms, 92 medium aneurysms, and 84 large aneurysms, with a mean size of 45.1 +/- 3.7 mm, 53.8 +/- 3.1 mm, and 66.1 +/- 6.8 mm, respectively (P<.01). There was no significant difference in proximal neck or iliac artery diameter among the 3 groups. The proximal aortic neck length (28.1 +/- 11.6 mm [small]; 23.9 +/- 11.3 mm [medium]; and 22.1 +/- 11.6 mm [large]; P<.05) was significantly shorter in large aneurysms. Furthermore, there was a significant increase (6% [small]; 15% [medium]; and 21% [large]; P<.05) in angulated necks in large aneurysms. Following treatment, aneurysm diameter remained stable in most patients (83% [small]; 82% [medium]; and 83% [large]), with a mean decrease of 2.0 +/- 6.5 mm, 2.1 +/- 6.1 mm, and 3.7 +/- 7.7 mm in each group, respectively (P =.45). There was no difference in the incidence of endoleaks, aneurysm contraction, or aneurysm expansion based on preoperative aneurysm diameter. Secondary procedures were performed in 5 (20%) of 25, 9 (5.2%) of 170, and 5 (36%) of 11 aneurysms that contracted, remained stable, or expanded, respectively, following EVAR (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is a 15% increase in neck angulation and a 27% decrease in neck length in large compared with small infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms, with no difference in outcome. Aneurysms that are stable following EVAR have a significantly lower incidence of requiring secondary procedures.     

Aneurysmal change at or above the proximal anastomosis after infrarenal aortic grafting.

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients undergoing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm at or above the proximal anastomosis of a previous infrarenal aortic graft between 1986 and 1991. Infected grafts and patients with suprarenal aneurysms present at the time of the original graft were excluded. Twenty-one patients, 19 men and two women, were included. The original indication for surgery was aneurysm in 14 patients and occlusive disease in seven; the mean interval from initial surgery to presentation was 10 years (range, 3 to 23 years). Twelve lesions were anastomotic false aneurysms, and nine were true aneurysms beginning in the proximal juxta-anastomotic aorta. Fourteen patients had an asymptomatic abdominal mass. Seven patients had symptoms of acute expansion (three), rupture (three), or thrombosis (one). True aneurysm and symptomatic presentation were correlated with aneurysm as the original indication for surgery. Repair was accomplished by an interpositional graft in 13 and graft replacement in eight. Seven patients required suprarenal anastomosis or renal and visceral reconstruction. Five operative deaths (24%) occurred, including two of three patients with rupture (67%) and two of seven patients (28%) in the suprarenal group. The mortality rate for elective repair with an infrarenal anastomosis was 11%. Two additional late deaths occurred during the follow-up period.     

Der retroperitoneale Zugang beim infrarenalen Aortenaneurysma – perioperative Komplikationen und Langzeitergebnisse

The retroperitoneal approach to the infrarenal aortic aneurysm is an alternative to the traditional transperitoneal approach and has been claimed to have a lower early mortality and perioperative morbidity. We retrospectively analyzed 81 infrarenal aneurysms of 215 aortoiliac reconstructions that had been operated between 1993 and 2000 using a retroperitoneal approach. Elective surgery was done in 56 (69%) patients, a symptomatic aneurysm was operated in 18 (22%), and a ruptured aneurysm in 7 patients (9%). Bifurcated grafts were implanted in 72 (89%) and tube grafts in 9 patients (11%). The median follow-up was 4.3 years (0.5–7 years). The 30-day mortality was 1.2%. There was one intraoperative complication (1.2%) related to the retroperitoneal approach. Immediate postoperative extubation was possible in 44 patients (54%); all remaining patients were extubated within 24 h. The median intensive care stay was 3 days; patients without perioperative complications were all discharged home within 1 week. For abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery, a routine retroperitoneal approach is an attractive alternative to the median laparotomy. In this series, the retroperitoneal incision was associated with a low mortality and morbidity rate and an uneventful postoperative recovery. This incision was successfully used even for symptomatic and ruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysms.     

Ligation and extraanatomic arterial reconstruction for the treatment of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta

Purpose: Since Blaisdell et al. first described axillobifemoral bypass and aortic exclusion to treat patients at high risk with abdominal aortic aneurysms in 1965, this approach has been controversial. To help define the appropriate application of this procedure, the recent experience of the authors was reviewed. Methods: Twenty-six patients underwent operation between March 1980 and August 1992. Mean age was 71 ± 7 years. Average aneurysm diameter was 7.0 ± 1.5 cm. Sixty-nine percent of the aneurysms were symptomatic; 21% were suprarenal. All patients had serious comorbid factors. All underwent axillobifemoral bypass with iliac artery ligation; the infrarenal aorta was also ligated in 62%. Results: There were two postoperative deaths (7.7%). One- and two-year survival rates were 59% and 38%, respectively. Three patients died of aneurysm rupture (11.5%); the aorta had not been ligated in two of these patients. The remaining late deaths were due to comorbid conditions. Extraanatomic bypass grafts thrombosed in five patients; no limbs were lost. Conclusions: Axillobifemoral bypass without aortic ligation does not effectively reduce the risk of aneurysm rupture. However, axillobifemoral bypass with aortic ligation is an acceptable treatment for patients with severe medical problems and symptomatic, anatomically complicated, or large abdominal aortic aneurysms. Because the risk of aneurysm rupture is not completely eliminated, this procedure should be reserved for patients with high-risk aneurysms who would not tolerate direct aortic replacement. (J VASC SURG 1994;20:629-36.)     

The natural history of abdominal aortic aneurysms

This study examines the rate of expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms and the risk of rupture in relation to their size. To assess these variables, we conducted a prospective study of 300 consecutive patients who presented over a 6-year interval with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) that were initially managed nonoperatively. The mean age of the patients was 70.4 years, and 211 (70%) were men. The mean initial aneurysm diameter was 4.1 cm. Among the 208 patients who underwent more than one ultrasound or computed tomographic (CT) scan, the diameter of the aneurysm increased by a median of 0.3 cm per year. The 6-year cumulative incidence of rupture was 1% and 2% among patients with aneurysms less than 4.0 cm and 4.0 to 4.9 cm in diameter, respectively (p greater than 0.05). In comparison, the 6-year cumulative incidence of rupture was 20% among patients with aneurysms greater than 5.0 cm in diameter (p less than 0.004). We conclude that (1) abdominal aortic aneurysms expand at a median rate of 0.3 cm per year; and (2) the risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms less than 5.0 cm is substantially lower than the risk of rupture of aneurysms 5.0 cm or more in diameter.     

Technik des offenen Bauchaortenersatzes

Abdominal aortic aneurysms have a prevalence of up to 9% in the subgroup of elderly (>?65 years) men and are responsible for approximately 2% of deaths in this group due to aneurysm rupture. Abdominal aortic aneurysms are most frequently confined to the infrarenal aorta; however, in 5% of cases they may extend proximally to the renal arteries (juxtarenal aneurysms). Open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms is indicated at a diameter over 5.5?cm in asymptomatic patients and is accompanied by mortality between 1 and 2% in specialized centres and 4.3% in randomized multicentre studies. The principle of surgical therapy is replacement of the diseased aorta by implantation of a prosthetic graft. Depending on the extent of the aneurysm, tube grafts or bifurcated grafts can be utilized. In this article operative details of the implantation of tube and bifurcated grafts as well as additional techniques for the treatment of juxtarenal, inflammatory and ruptured aneurysms will be presented.