The role of the VEGF-C/-D/flt-4 autocrine loop in the pathogenesis of salivary neoplasms

Salivary gland cells produce and secrete VEGF under normal conditions, but this property has not been studied in salivary gland neoplasms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of VEGF-C/VEGF-D/flt-4 in salivary gland tumors. Thirty-one salivary gland tumors (19 with and 12 without myoepithelial differentiation) were examined. Immunostaining for VEGF-C/VEGF-D/flt-4, p63 and SMA was carried out. The chi-square distribution and the Pearson correlation were applied. A statistically significant relationship (p<0.05) was found in the group of tumors with myoepithelial differentiation regarding simultaneous positive staining for VEGF-C/VEGF-D and flt-4. All pleomorphic adenomas (PA) exhibited a statistically significant coexpression of the three antibodies. p63 and SMA were strongly expressed in the same areas as VEGF-C, VEGF-D and flt-4. The cells responsible for the strong expression of VEGF-C, VEGF-D and flt-4 in PAs are myoepithelial cells. Coexpression of flt-4 and its ligands in all PAs suggests the presence of a dominant VEGF-C/VEGF-D/flt-4 axis in this tumor.     

VEGF-B expression in human primary breast cancers is associated with lymph node metastasis but not angiogenesis

Angiogenesis is essential for tumour growth and metastasis. It is regulated by numerous angiogenic factors, one of the most important being vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Recently VEGF-B, a new VEGF family member that binds to the tyrosine kinase receptor flt-1, has been identified. Although the importance of VEGF has been shown in many human tumour types, the contribution of VEGF-B to tumour neovascularization is unknown in any tumour type. This study therefore measured the mRNA level of VEGF-B and its receptor flt-1 by ribonuclease protection assay and the pattern of VEGF-B expression by immunohistochemistry in 13 normal breast samples and 68 invasive breast cancers. Flt-1 expression was significantly higher in tumours than in normal breast (p=0.02) but no significant difference was seen in VEGF-B between normal and neoplastic breast (p=0.3). There was a significant association between VEGF-B and node status (p=0.02) and the number of involved nodes (p=0.01), but not with age (p=0.7), size (p=0.6), oestrogen receptor (ER) (p=0.2), grade (p=0.5) or vascular invasion (p=0.16). No significant relationship was present between VEGF-B and flt-1 (p=0.2) or tumour vascularity (p=0.4). VEGF-B was expressed mostly in the cytoplasm of tumour cells, although occasional stromal components including fibroblasts and endothelial cells were also positive. No difference in VEGF-B expression was observed adjacent to regions of necrosis, in keeping with this VEGF family member not being hypoxically regulated. These findings suggest that VEGF-B may contribute to tumour progression by a non-angiogenic mechanism, possibly by increasing plasminogen activators and hence metastasis, as has been described in vitro. Measurement of VEGF-B together with other angiogenic factors may identify a poor prognostic patient group, which may benefit from anti-VEGF receptor therapy targeted to flt-1 (VEGFR1) as well as kdr (VEGFR2).     

血管内皮生长因子及其受体在子宫内膜癌中的表达

目的探讨血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)及其受体fms样酪氨酸受体-1 (flt-1)和含插入区的激酶受体(KDR)在子宫内膜癌血管生成中的作用及其与内膜癌分化程度的关系.方法采用免疫组织化学及原位杂交方法对23例子宫内膜癌及6例正常绝经期子宫内膜中VEGF、flt-1、KDR蛋白质及其mRNA进行检测,并对少数病例行Western印迹分析,以检测VEGF亚型在内膜癌组织的分布,用内皮细胞标志Ⅷ因子标记内膜癌组织中的微血管密度.结果 VEGF、flt-1、KDR蛋白质及其mRNA主要分布在子宫内膜癌组织血管内皮细胞及癌细胞胞质内.VEGF蛋白质在中分化(G2)、低分化(G3)内膜癌血管内皮细胞及癌细胞上的表达高于高分化内膜癌(G1)及正常绝经期子宫内膜(P<0.05), VEGF mRNA在不同分化程度内膜癌组织的表达差异无显著性意义(P>0.05),但均大于正常绝经期子宫内膜(P<0.05);flt-1蛋白质及flt-1mRNA在G3内膜癌血管内皮细胞的表达高于G1、G2及正常绝经期子宫内膜(P<0.05),在癌细胞的表达差异无显著性意义(P>0.05) ,但均高于正常绝经期子宫内膜(P<0.05);KDR蛋白质在子宫内膜癌组织血管内皮细胞及癌细胞上的表达较强,但不随分化程度发生变化,其mRNA在中分化(G2)、低分化(G3)内膜癌血管内皮细胞及癌细胞上的表达高于正常绝经期子宫内膜(P<0.05).G3子宫内膜癌组织的血管密度(48个±12个)高于G1(27个±14个)、G2(26个±16个)及正常绝经期子宫内膜(26个±11个,P<0.05).结论 VEGF、flt-1、KDR及mRNA在子宫内膜癌中的表达形式提示其与癌组织血管生成及血管通透性相关,VEGF及其受体是与子宫内膜癌旺盛生长相关的因子之一.     

Strong expression of kinase insert domain-containing receptor, a vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor in AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma and cutaneous angiosarcoma.

Vascular permeability factor (VPF), also known as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), plays an important role in the angiogenesis associated with the growth of many human and animal tumors. VPF/VEGF stimulates endothelial cell growth and increases microvascular permeability by interacting with two endothelial cell tyrosine kinase receptors, KDR and flt-1. We studied 16 cases of AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma (KS), 2 cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma, and 6 cases of capillary hemangioma by in situ hybridization for expression of VPF/VEGF, KDR, and flt-1 mRNAs. We also performed immunohistochemical staining for VPF/VEGF protein in 15 cases. Tumor cells in KS and angiosarcoma strongly expressed KDR but not flt-1 mRNA. Endothelial cells in small stromal vessels in and around these tumors strongly expressed both KDR and flt-1 mRNAs. Tumor cells expressed VPF/VEGF mRNA strongly in only one case of KS, adjacent to an area of necrosis. This was also the only case in which the tumor cells stained substantially for VPF/VEGF protein. VPF/VEGF mRNA and protein were, however, strongly expressed by squamous epithelium in areas of hyperplasia and near areas of ulceration overlying tumors. VPF/VEGF mRNA was also expressed focally at lower levels by infiltrating inflammatory cells, probably macrophages. The strong expression of both KDR and flt-1 in small stromal vessels in and around tumors suggests that VPF/VEGF may be an important regulator of the edema and angiogenesis seen in these tumors. The strong expression of KDR by tumor cells in KS and angiosarcoma implies that VPF/VEGF may also have a direct effect on tumor cells. Tumor cells in four of six capillary hemangiomas strongly expressed both KDR and flt-1 mRNAs in contrast to the high level expression of only KDR observed in the malignant vascular tumors studied. Neither VPF/VEGF mRNA or protein were strongly expressed in capillary hemangiomas. VPF/VEGF and its receptors may play an important but as yet incompletely understood role in the pathogenesis of both benign and malignant vascular tumors.     

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors VEGF-B and VEGF-C Are Expressed in Human Tumors

The growth of solid tumors is dependent on angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a secreted endothelial-cell-specific mitogen. We have recently characterized two novel endothelial growth factors with structural homology to VEGF and named them VEGF-B and VEGF-C. To further define the roles of VEGF-B and VEGF-C, we have studied their expression in a variety of human tumors, both malignant and benign. VEGF-B mRNA was detected in most of the tumor samples studied, and the mRNA and the protein product were localized to tumor cells. Endothelial cells of tumor vessels were also immunoreactive for VEGF-B, probably representing the binding sites of the VEGF-B polypeptide secreted by adjacent tumor cells. VEGF-C mRNA was detected in approximately one-half of the cancers analyzed. Via in situ hybridization, VEGF-C mRNA was also localized to tumor cells. All lymphomas studied contained low levels of VEGF-C mRNA, possibly reflecting the cell-specific pattern of expression of the VEGF-C gene in the corresponding normal cells. The expression of VEGF-C is associated with the development of lymphatic vessels, and VEGF-C could be an important factor regulating the mutual paracrine relationships between tumor cells and lymphatic endothelial cells. Furthermore, VEGF-C and VEGF-B can, similarly to VEGF, be involved in tumor angiogenesis.     

Signaling pathways induced by vascular endothelial growth factor (review)

Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis are the mechanisms responsible for the development of the blood vessels. Angiogenesis refers to the formation of capillaries from pre-existing vessels in the embryo and adult organism, while vasculogenesis is the development of new blood vessels from the differentiation of endothelial precursors (angioblasts) in situ. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family members are major mediators of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis both during development and in pathological conditions. VEGF has a variety of effects on vascular endothelium, including the ability to promote endothelial cell viability, mitogenesis, chemotaxis, and vascular permeability. It mediates its activity mainly via two tyrosine kinase receptors, VEGFR-1 (flt-1) and VEGFR-2 (flk-1/KDR), although other receptors, such as neuropilin-1 and -2, can also bind VEGF. Another tyrosine kinase receptor, VEGFR-3 (flt-4) binds VEGF-C and VEGF-D and is more important in the development of lymphatic vessels. While the functional effects of VEGF on endothelial cells has been well studied, not as much is known about VEGF signaling. This review summarizes the different pathways known to be involved in VEGF signal transduction and the biological responses triggered by the VEGF signaling cascade.     

Localisation of members of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family and their receptors in human atherosclerotic arteries

BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mediates endothelial cell mitogenesis and enhances vascular permeability. The existence of single or multiple VEGF isoforms and receptors suggests that these proteins may have overlapping but distinct functions, which may be reflected in their cell expression and distribution. METHODS: The localisation of VEGFs A-C and their receptors (VEGFRs 1-3, respectively) in 30 fresh human atherosclerotic arteries, 15 normal uterine arteries, and 15 saphenous veins using immunohistochemistry and western blotting. RESULTS: Saphenous veins showed no staining for VEGF-B or VEGFR-2. Smooth muscle cells (SMCs) showed the strongest staining for VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 in all specimens. Conversely, VEGFR-3 and VEGF-C were predominantly localised to the endothelial vasa vasorum in normal arteries, whereas medial SMCs showed the strongest staining in atherosclerotic arteries. Western blotting showed variations in VEGF protein localisation, with lower amounts of VEGF-B and VEGF-C in saphenous veins, compared with arterial tissue. Amounts of VEGF-C were lower than those of VEGF-A and VEGF-B in all specimens. CONCLUSION: This study provides direct evidence of the presence of VEGF proteins and receptors in human physiology and pathology, with variations in both the amounts of VEGF proteins expressed and their cellular distribution in normal arteries compared with atherosclerotic arteries. The presence of VEGFs A-C and their receptors in normal arterial tissue implies that VEGF functions may extend beyond endothelial cell proliferation. Reduced VEGFR-2 staining in atherosclerotic arteries may have implications for the atherosclerosis process and the development of vascular disease and its complications.     

Endoglin (CD105) and vascular endothelial growth factor as prognostic markers in prostatic adenocarcinoma

We studied endoglin and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression as prognostic markers in prostatic adenocarcinoma in 50 radical prostatectomy specimens. Cases were further categorized by Gleason score as follows: 8 to 10, 9 cases; 7(4 + 3), 9 cases; 7 (3 + 4), 14 cases; 6, 13 cases; and 4 or 5, 5 cases. All cases were immunostained for endoglin, CD31, and VEGF. Positively stained microvessels were counted in densely vascular foci in a x 400 field. VEGF staining intensity was scored on a 2-tiered scale. Results were correlated with survival and other parameters. Endoglin demonstrated significantly more microvessels than did CD31 (mean +/- SD, 37 +/- 15 vs 22 +/- 17; P < .001). VEGF expression was low in 21 cases (42%) and high in 29 (58%). Endoglin correlated positively with Gleason score, lymph node metastases, tumor stage, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen level (P < .05) but not with CD31. VEGF correlated significantly with angiolymphatic invasion and Gleason score (P < .05). A high endoglin microvessel count and VEGF expression correlated with shorter survival. Endoglin is a more specific and sensitive marker for tumor angiogenesis than CD31 and may serve as a prognostic marker for prostatic adenocarcinoma.     

胰岛素对牛胸主动脉内皮细胞血管内皮生长因子及其受体表达的影响

目的:评价胰岛素对培养的牛胸主动脉内皮细胞血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)及其受体表达的影响。方法: 取新生的小牛胸主动脉,做血管内皮细胞原代及传代培养,取4-6代培养细胞分组,应用不同浓度的胰岛素(30 mU/L、300 mU/L、3 000 mU/L)干预培养过程,48 h后应用免疫组化法测定内皮细胞VEGF及其受体(flt-1、flk-1/KDR)的表达水平。结果: 低浓度胰岛素组(30 mU/L、300 mU/L)内皮细胞VEGF表达明显高于不用胰岛素组(P<0.01);高浓度组(3 000 mU/L)内皮细胞VEGF表达明显低于不用胰岛素组(P＜0.05);各组内皮细胞VEGF受体(flt-1及flk-1/KDR)的表达无明显差异(P＞0.05)。结论: 低浓度胰岛素促进小牛主动脉血管内皮细胞VEGF表达;高浓度胰岛素可抑制血管内皮细胞VEGF表达;胰岛素对小牛主动脉血管内皮细胞VEGF受体(flt-1、flk-1/KDR)的表达无直接影响。     

Smad4的表达与卵巢癌淋巴管生成及淋巴结转移之间的关系

目的观察Smad4和血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)-C在卵巢癌组织内的表达情况,分析Smad4和VEGF-C的表达与卵巢癌淋巴管生成及淋巴结转移之间的关系。方法取卵巢癌病例60例,其中,淋巴结转移组36例,无淋巴结转移组24例。应用免疫组化法和Westernblot技术观察Smad4和VEGF-C在卵巢癌组织内的表达。以D2-40作为淋巴管内皮特异性标记物,检测卵巢癌组织内淋巴管生成情况。结果 Smad4表达于卵巢癌细胞胞浆和胞核内,其在无淋巴结转移组的表达率明显高于其在有淋巴结转移组的表达率。Smad4表达阳性组的淋巴管数密度(LVD)明显低于Smad4表达阴性组的LVD。VEGF-C主要表达于卵巢癌细胞胞浆内,其在淋巴结转移组的表达率明显高于其在无淋巴结转移组的表达率。Smad4的表达与VEGF-C的表达呈显著的负相关性。Western blot检测结果表明,VEGF-C蛋白在有淋巴结转移卵巢癌组织中的表达量高于其在无淋巴结转移卵巢癌组织内的表达量,而Smad4在有淋巴结转移卵巢癌组织内的表达量明显低于其在无淋巴结转移组的表达量。结论 Smad4与VEGF-C的表达呈负相关,Smad4可能通过调节VEGF-C蛋白的表达而抑制卵巢癌淋巴管生成和淋巴道转移。     

乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌的病理学特征与淋巴结转移的关系

目的研究乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌(IMPC)的病理学特征与淋巴结转移的关系。方法观察51例乳腺IMPC的主要病理学特征及淋巴结转移情况,采用免疫组织化学方法(LSAB法)检测IMPC中血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)-C和VEGF受体(R)-3的表达并计数淋巴管密度,分析其与淋巴结转移的关系。结果(1)乳腺IMPC病理组织学分级Ⅱ、Ⅲ级组的淋巴结转移数平均12.5个,明显高于Ⅰ级组的4.0个;(2)间质淋巴细胞浸润(+)和(++)组的淋巴结转移率(27/28,96.4%)明显高于(-)和(±)组(14/23,60.9%),且其淋巴结转移数平均14.4个,也明显高于(-)和(±)组的4.6个;(3)IMPC肿瘤细胞的VEGF-C表达在病理组织学分级Ⅱ、Ⅲ级组显著高于Ⅰ级组(P=0.03),VEGF-C的表达与淋巴结转移呈正相关(P=0.006);淋巴管密度与VEGF-C表达(P=0.009)、淋巴结转移(P=0.007)呈正相关;(4)肿瘤组织中IMPC成分的多少与淋巴结转移无显著性关系,淋巴结转移灶为纯IMPC或以IMPC成分为主;(5)28例伴有导管原位癌的IMPC中,14例为微乳头状型导管原位癌(14/28,50%)。结论乳腺IMPC的病理组织学分级、淋巴管密度及间质淋巴细胞浸润可能是影响IMPC淋巴结转移的关键性因素。VEGF-C和VEGFR-3表达增高是促使IMPC发生淋巴结转移的重要原因。微乳头状型导管原位癌可能是IMPC的早期阶段。     

Smad4和VEGF-C在喉癌中的表达及其与淋巴管生成之间的关系

目的观察Smad4与VEGF-C在喉癌组织内的表达情况,分析Smad4和VEGF-C的表达与喉癌组织内淋巴管生成及淋巴结转移之间的关系。方法取喉癌病例58例,其中淋巴结转移组34例,无淋巴结转移组24例。应用免疫组化法和Western blot技术观察Smad4和VEGF-C在喉癌组织内的表达。以D2-40特异性标检测喉癌组织内淋巴管生成情况。结果 Smad4在无淋巴结转移的喉癌组织内的表达率明显高于其在有淋巴结转移组的表达率。Smad4表达阳性组的淋巴管数密度(LVD)明显低于Smad4表达阴性组的LVD。VEGF-C在淋巴结转移组的表达率明显高于其在无淋巴结转移组的表达率。Smad4的表达与VEGF-C的表达呈显著的负相关性(r=-0.391)。结论 VEGF-C在喉癌淋巴管的发生及淋巴结转移中发挥重要作用。Smad4与VEGF-C的表达呈负相关,Smad4可能有抑制喉癌淋巴管生成和淋巴道转移的作用。     

血管内皮生长因子及其受体在卵巢癌中表达的免疫组化检测

目的： 检测血管内皮生长因子（ＶＥＧＦ） 及其受体（ＫＤＲ） 在卵巢癌中的表达, 并探讨其与卵巢癌发生的关系。方法： 采用ＳＡＢＣ免疫组化染色法, 对６６ 例卵巢肿瘤中, ＶＥＧＦ 和ＫＤＲ 的表达进行检测。结果： 恶性、交界性及良性卵巢肿瘤中, ＶＥＧＦ 和ＫＤＲ 的表达率分别为７２－９％ 、７５－００ ％ 、３８－４６ ％ 及５４－０５％ 、４３－７５％ 、７－６９ ％ ; 恶性肿瘤及交界性肿瘤ＶＥＧＦ和ＫＤＲ的表达, 明显高于良性肿瘤（Ｐ＜ ０－０５） 。ＫＤＲ 不仅表达于肿瘤血管内皮细胞, 在肿瘤细胞内也有强表达。有淋巴结转移的卵巢癌ＶＥＧＦ 的表达与无淋巴结转移者相比较, 有显著差异（Ｐ＜ ０－０５）; ＫＤＲ 的表达与卵巢癌淋巴结转移无关（Ｐ＞ ０－０５）; 卵巢癌的不同临床分期、病理类型及病理分级间ＶＥＧＦ和ＫＤＲ的表达, 无显著性差异（ Ｐ＞ ０－０５） 。结论： ＶＥＧＦ和ＫＤＲ 的表达可能与卵巢癌的发生有关。     

Angiogenic and lymphangiogenic microvessel density in breast carcinoma: correlation with clinicopathologic parameters and VEGF-family gene expression.

Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis are essential for breast cancer progression and are regulated by vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF). To determine clinical and molecular correlates of these processes, we measured blood and lymphatic vascular microvessel density in 29 invasive carcinomas (22 ductal, six lobular, one papillary), using the vascular marker CD31 and the novel lymphatic marker D2-40. Microvessel density was assessed microscopically and by image cytometry, and was compared with tumor histology, grade, stage, lymph node metastasis, hormone receptors, HER2/neu status, and expression of VEGF, VEGF-C and VEGF-D by immunohistochemistry or quantitative RT-PCR. Strong correlation was observed between visual and image cytometric microvessel density using D2-40 but not CD31 (P=0.016 and 0.1521, respectively). Image cytometric CD31 microvessel density correlated with tumor size, grade, stage and lymph node metastasis (P=0.0001, 0.0107, 0.0035 and 0.0395, respectively). D2-40 microvessel density correlated with tumor stage (P=0.0123 by image cytometry) and lymph node metastasis (P=0.0558 by microscopy). Immunohistochemical VEGF signal in peritumoral blood vessels correlated with image cytometric CD31 and D2-40 microvessel density (P=0.022 and 0.0012, respectively), consistent with the role of VEGF in blood and lymphatic vascular growth. Intratumoral VEGF-C and VEGF-D expression by quantitative RT-PCR correlated with D2-40 (P=0.0291 by image cytometry) but not with CD31 microvessel density, which could suggest a selective role of VEGF-C and VEGF-D in lymphangiogenesis. CD31 and D2-40 microvessel density correlated significantly with several prognostic factors, including lymph node metastasis. Thus, measurements of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis may have utility for breast cancer pathology, particularly for estimation of metastatic risk.     

甲状腺癌组织中VEGF和VEGF-C的表达及意义

目的　探讨血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、VEGF- C在甲状腺癌中的表达及其意义。方法　应用免疫组化S P法检测44例甲状腺癌中VEGF、VEGF C的表达情况,并以17例癌旁正常甲状腺组织作对照。结果　VEGF、VEGF- C在甲状腺癌中呈高水平表达(88. 6%、81. 8% )。VEGF表达随癌组织分化程度的减低而增高, 9例死亡病例均为阳性表达;VEGF- C表达随癌组织分化程度的减低而减低,乳头状癌阳性表达(88 .9% )高于其它类型,VEGF- C阳性率在有淋巴结转移组(92. 0% )明显高于无淋巴结转移组(68. 4% ) (P<0. 05)。9例死亡病例中7例为阳性表达,且7例同时VEGF呈阳性表达。结论　VEGF、VEGF- C表达与甲状腺癌病理分型及预后可能有一定关系,VEGF- C与甲状腺癌淋巴结转移密切相关。     

基质金属蛋白酶2和9及血管内皮生长因子C在乳腺癌淋巴结转移中的作用

目的 研究血管内皮生长因子C(VEGF-C)与基质金属蛋白酶(MMP)-2、MMP-9在乳腺癌组织中的表达及三者在乳腺癌淋巴结转移中的作用.方法 应用免疫组织化学SP法对84例乳腺癌(有腋淋巴结转移者52例,无腋淋巴结转移者32例)的VEGF-C、MMP-2和-9以及血管内皮透明质酸受体-1(LYVE-1)的表达进行检测,统计分析VEGF-C、MMP-2和-9与乳腺癌淋巴管生成的关系.利用重组质粒表达载体介导的短发夹式干扰RNA(shRNA)靶向沉默乳腺癌MCF-7细胞株中VEGF-C基因,PCR检测VEGF-C、MMP-2和-9的表达.结果 VEGF-C与MMP-2和-9在乳腺癌组织中均呈过表达,分别为83.3%(70/84)、89.3%(75/84)和75.0%(63/84),且在腋淋巴结转移组[94.2%(49/52)、98.1%(51/52)和88.5%(46/52)]比无淋巴结转移组[65.6%(21/32)、75.0%(24/32)和53.1%(17/32)]明显高表达(P＜0.05);淋巴管密度在腋淋巴结转移组及无转移组的表达有统计学意义(P＜0.05),随着VEGF-C与MMP-2和-9表达强度增加,淋巴管数量也增加(P＜0.05);转染重组质粒后MCF-7细胞株的VEGF-C及MMP-2和-9的mRNA表达水平下调,抑制率分别为95.0%、53.0%和77.0%(P＜0.05).结论 VEGF-C与MMP-2和-9协同促进乳腺癌组织的淋巴管新生和乳腺癌淋巴结转移.     

早中期食管鳞状细胞癌中Notch1与血管内皮生长因子C的表达及其意义

目的 研究Notch1与血管内皮生长因子C(VEGF-C)在早中期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)中的表达及其与临床病理特征的关系.方法 收集2007年5月至12月在本院行食管癌根治术的40例早中期ESCC和8例正常食管组织病理标本,免疫组化方法检测Notch1和VEGF-C的表达,并探讨其与临床病理特征的关系,分析Notch1和VEGF-C表达的相关性.结果 与正常食管组织比较,早中期ESCC组织Notch1表达阳性率下降[47.5%(19/40)比100.0%(8/8),P=0.006)],而VEGF-C表达升高[67.5%(27/40)比0.0%(0/8),P=0.000].高、中、低分化ESCC组织中Notch1表达阳性率分别为80.0%(8/10)、50.0%(7/14)、25.0%(4/16),Notch1表达阳性率随肿瘤分化程度降低而降低(P=0.023),但在肿瘤浸润程度和淋巴结转移中差异无统计学意义(均P＞0.05).高、中、低分化ESCC组织中VEGF-C表达阳性率分别为30.0%(3/10)、71.4%(10/14)、81.3%(13/16),VEGF-C表达阳性率随分化程度的降低而升高(P=0.024).淋巴结转移阳性组VEGF-C表达阳性率高于淋巴结转移阴性组[100.0%(16/16)比45.8%(11/24),P=0.000].与T2分期组比较,T3～T4分期组ESCC组织VEGF-C表达阳性率升高[82.1%(23/28)比33.3%(4/12),P=0.000].Notch1与VEGF-C表达呈负相关(r=-0.486,P=0.003).结论 Notch1在早中期ESCC中表现为抑癌基因,其异常低表达可能是引起VEGF-C异常高表达的因素之一.