Pyridorin in type 2 diabetic nephropathy

Pyridoxamine dihydrochloride (Pyridorin, NephroGenex) inhibits formation of advanced glycation end products and scavenges reactive oxygen species and toxic carbonyls, but whether these actions translate into renoprotective effects is unknown. In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 317 patients with proteinuric type 2 diabetic nephropathy to twice-daily placebo; Pyridorin, 150 mg twice daily; or Pyridorin, 300 mg twice daily, for 52 weeks. At baseline, the mean age ± SD was 63.9±9.5 years, and the mean duration of diabetes was 17.6±8.5 years; the mean serum creatinine level was 2.2±0.6 mg/dl, and the mean protein-to-creatinine ratio was 2973±1932 mg/g. Regarding the primary end point, a statistically significant change in serum creatinine from baseline to 52 weeks was not evident in either Pyridorin group compared with placebo. However, analysis of covariance suggested that the magnitude of the treatment effect differed by baseline renal function. Among patients in the lowest tertile of baseline serum creatinine concentration, treatment with Pyridorin associated with a lower average change in serum creatinine concentration at 52 weeks (0.28, 0.07, and 0.14 mg/dl for placebo, Pyridorin 150 mg, and Pyridorin 300 mg, respectively; P=0.05 for either Pyridorin dose versus placebo); there was no evidence of a significant treatment effect in the middle or upper tertiles. In conclusion, this trial failed to detect an effect of Pyridorin on the progression of serum creatinine at 1 year, although it suggests that patients with less renal impairment might benefit.     

Effects of sulodexide in patients with type 2 diabetes and persistent albuminuria.

BACKGROUND: Urinary albumin excretion frequently persists in diabetic patients who are treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). Sulodexide, a glycosaminoglycan mixture of 80% heparan sulfate and 20% dermatan sulfate, has been hypothesized to reduce persistent albuminuria. We have conducted a multi-center randomized double-blind pilot study in order to determine the effect of 6 months' therapy with sulodexide on urinary albumin excretion and to address logistical issues for a full-scale trial. METHODS: A total of 149 patients with type 2 diabetes and an albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR) between 20 and 300 mg/g were randomized with equal allocation to either placebo, 200 mg of sulodexide or 400 mg of sulodexide. The primary endpoint was the achievement, at 6 months, of either 3(1) return to normoalbuminuria (ACR < 20 mg/g with a decrease of at least 25%) or (2) a decrease in ACR of at least 50% from the baseline value. All patients used a maximum tolerated recommended FDA approved dose of an ACEI or ARB for at least 60 days and had stable blood pressure prior to randomization. RESULTS: The primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in 25.3% of the patients in the two sulodexide groups combined versus 15.4% of the placebo-treated patients (P = 0.26). The primary endpoint was achieved in 33.3% (P = 0.075 for the comparison to placebo) in the sulodexide 200 mg group and 18.4% (P = 0.781) in the sulodexide 400 mg group. (No consistent patterns of side effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Based on the experience gained in this pilot study, one full-scale trial is currently being conducted to evaluate the effects of sulodexide on change in ACR in patients with persistent microalbuminuria, and a longer-term trial is underway to evaluate the effects of sulodexide on long-term renal disease progression in patients with overt proteinuria.     

Proteinuria, a target for renoprotection in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy: lessons from RENAAL

BACKGROUND: Proteinuria or albuminuria is an established risk marker for progressive renal function loss. Albuminuria can be effectively lowered with antihypertensive drugs that interrupt the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). We investigated whether albuminuria could not only serve as a marker of renal disease, but also function as a monitor of the renoprotective efficacy of RAS intervention by the angiotensin II (Ang II) antagonist, losartan, in patients with diabetic nephropathy. METHODS: The data from the RENAAL (Reduction in End Points in Noninsulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) study, a double-blind, randomized trial, were used to examine the effects of losartan on the renal outcome [i.e., the primary composite end point of doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or death] in 1513 type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy. We examined the effect of the degree of albuminuria at baseline, initial antiproteinuric response to therapy, and the degree of remaining (residual) albuminuria on renal outcome (either the primary composite end point of RENAAL or ESRD). We also evaluated the contribution to renal protection of the antiproteinuric effect of losartan independently of changes in blood pressure. RESULTS: Baseline albuminuria is almost linearly related to renal outcome, and is the strongest predictor among all measured well-known baseline risk parameters. After adjusting for baseline risk markers of age, gender, race, weight, smoking, sitting diastolic blood pressure, sitting systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, serum creatinine, albuminuria, hemoglobin, and hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) patients with high baseline albuminuria (> or =3.0 g/g creatinine) showed a 5.2-fold (95% CI 4.3-6.3) increased risk for reaching a renal end point, and a 8.1-fold (95% CI 6.1-10.8) increased risk for progressing to ESRD, compared to the low albuminuria group (<1.5 g/g). The changes in albuminuria in the first 6 months of therapy are roughly linearly related to the degree of long-term renal protection: every 50% reduction in albuminuria in the first 6 months was associated with a reduction in risk of 36% for renal end point and 45% for ESRD during later follow-up. Albuminuria at month 6, designated residual albuminuria, showed a linear relationship with renal outcome, almost identical to the relationship between baseline albuminuria and renal risk. Losartan reduced albuminuria by 28% (95% CI -25% to -36%), while placebo increased albuminuria by 4% (95% CI +8% to -1%) in the first 6 months of therapy. The specific (beyond blood pressure lowering) renoprotective effect of the Ang II antagonist, losartan, in this study is for the major part explained by its antialbuminuric effect (approximately 100% for the renal end point, and 50% for ESRD end point). CONCLUSION: Albuminuria is the predominant renal risk marker in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy on conventional treatment; the higher the albuminuria, the greater the renal risk. Reduction in albuminuria is associated with a proportional effect on renal protection, the greater the reduction the greater the renal protection. The residual albuminuria on therapy (month 6) is as strong a marker of renal outcome as is baseline albuminuria. The antiproteinuric effect of losartan explains a major component of its specific renoprotective effect. In conclusion, albuminuria should be considered a risk marker for progressive loss of renal function in type 2 diabetes with nephropathy, as well as a target for therapy. Reduction of residual albuminuria to the lowest achievable level should be viewed as a goal for future renoprotective treatments.     

Treatment of diabetic nephropathy with angiotensin II receptor antagonist

Type 2 diabetes is an ever-growing problem worldwide. Approximately 40% of the patients with type 2 diabetes will develop diabetic kidney disease. In the United States, diabetes has become the most common single cause of endstage renal disease defined by the need for dialysis or transplantation. Patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy have a dramatically increased cardiovascular risk. The Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial was designed to determine whether the use of irbesartan or a calcium channel blocker would provide protection against the progression of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes beyond that attributable to the lowering of blood pressure. In that study, 1715 hypertensive patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to irbesartan 300 mg/day or amlodipine 10 mg/day, or placebo. All patients randomized in this trial had more than 900 mg of protein in their urine and serum creatinines between 1.0 mg/dl and 3.0 mg/dl. The target blood pressure was 135/85 mmHg or less in all groups. The primary outcome was time to a combined endpoint of doubling of their baseline serum creatinine concentration, the development of endstage renal disease, or death from any cause. The mean duration of follow-up was 2.6 years. Treatment with irbesartan was associated with a risk of the primary composite endpoint that was 20% lower than that in the placebo group (P = 0.02) and 23% lower than that in the amlodipine group (P = 0.006). The risk of doubling of the serum creatinine concentration was 33% lower in the irbesartan group than in the placebo group (P = 0.003) and 37% lower in the irbesartan group than in the amlodipine group (P < 0.001). Treatment with irbesartan was associated with a relative risk of endstage renal disease that was 23% lower than that in both other groups. These differences were not accounted for by differences in the blood pressures that were achieved. Proteinuria was reduced on average by 33% in the irbesartan group as compared with 6% in the amlodipine group and 10% in the placebo group. The angiotensin II receptor blocker irbesartan was shown to be effective in protecting against the progression of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. In a study done in patients with type 2 diabetes and early nephropathy as manifested by microalbuminuria, 590 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria were randomized to receive either irbesartan 150 mg/day or irbesartan 300 mg/day and followed for 2 years. The primary outcome in that trial was the time to the onset of diabetic nephropathy, defined by persistent albuminuria in overnight specimens, with a urinary albumin excretion rate that was more than 200 mg/min or at least 30% higher than the baseline level. The irbesartan 150 mg/day group demonstrated a 39% relative risk reduction versus the control group in the development of overt proteinuria. The irbesartan 300 mg/day group demonstrated a highly significant 70% risk reduction versus the control group (P < 0.001). The albumin excretion rate was reduced in the two irbesartan groups throughout the study (−11% and −38% at 24 months compared with baseline in the irbesartan 150-mg and 300-mg groups, respectively). The albumin excretion rate remained unchanged in the control group. Irbesartan was demonstrated in the above study to be renoprotective, independent of its blood pressure-lowering effect, in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Thus, irbesartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, was demonstrated to be significantly renoprotective in patients with type 2 diabetes with either early nephropathy (microalbuminuria) or late nephropathy (proteinuria). The renoprotective effects of irbesartan were above and beyond the effects irbesartan had on systemic blood pressure. Patients with type 2 diabetes and either early or late diabetic nephropathy should be treated with the angiotensin II receptor blocker irbesartan. Received: October 18, 2002 / Accepted: December 17, 2002 Correspondence to:E.J. Lewis     

The Irbesartan type II diabetic nephropathy trial: study design and baseline patient characteristics. For the Collaborative Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic nephropathy is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease in the developed world. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been demonstrated to be renoprotective in type I diabetes and are now the standard of care for both hypertensive and non-hypertensive type I diabetic patients with any level of proteinuria. The role of blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in type II diabetic patients is not defined. The Collaborative Study Group has initiated the Irbesartan Type II Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT), studying the effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan on progression of renal disease and mortality in type II diabetic patients with overt nephropathy and hypertension. Here we report the study design and baseline patient characteristics. METHODS: To qualify, hypertensive type II patients, age 30-70 years, must have a 24 h urinary protein excretion of >900 mg and a serum creatinine 90-265 micromol/l (1.0-3. 0 mg/dl) in women and 110-265 micromol/l (1.2-3.0 mg/dl) in men. Three treatment arms include irbesartan, placebo and amlodipine, with every attempt made to achieve similar blood pressure levels in all treatment arms. A total of 1650 patients will be enrolled utilizing approximately 225 clinics worldwide. The primary outcome measure is time to event to the composite end-point of doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease or death. The secondary outcome measure is time to composite end-point of fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular events. The average length of patient follow-up is expected to be approximately 36 months. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the study subjects are: age 59+/-8 years, duration of diabetes 15+/-9 years, height 168+/-11 cm (5 ft 6 in), weight 87+/-19 kg (192 lb), body mass index 31+/-7 kg/m(2), blood pressure 156+/-18 mmHg/85+/-11 mmHg, serum creatinine 150+/-53 micromol/l (1.7+/-0.6 mg/dl), creatinine clearance 66+/-34 ml/min and 24 h urine protein 4.0+/-3.5 g/day.     

Oral sulodexide reduces albuminuria in microalbuminuric and macroalbuminuric type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients: the Di.N.A.S. randomized trial

Diabetic nephropathy may be effectively prevented and treated by controlling glycemia and administering angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. However, strict metabolic control can be difficult, and ACE inhibitors may be poorly tolerated and only partially effective, particularly in diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2), warranting the search for ancillary treatment. Sulodexide is a glycosaminoglycan, a new class of drug that has demonstrated nephroprotective activity in experimental investigations. The Di.N.A.S. study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, dose-range finding trial to evaluate the extent and duration of the hypoalbuminuric effect of oral sulodexide in diabetic patients. A total of 223 microalbuminuric and macroalbuminuric DM1 and DM2 patients with serum creatinine < or =150 micromol/L and stable BP and metabolic control were recruited. They were randomly allocated to one of four groups: 50 mg/d, 100 mg/d, or 200 mg/d sulodexide daily or placebo for 4 mo (T0 to T4), with 4 mo of follow-up after drug suspension (T4 to T8). Treatment with 200 mg/d sulodexide for 4 mo significantly reduced log albumin excretion rate (logAER) from 5.25 +/- 0.18 at T0 to 3.98 +/- 0.11 at T4 (P < 0.05), which was maintained till T8 (4.11 +/- 0.13; P < 0.05 versus T0). Moreover, the sulodexide-induced percent reductions in AER at T4 were significantly different from the placebo value at T4 and approximately linear to dose increments (30% [confidence limits, 4 to 49%], P = 0.03; 49% [30 to 63%], P = 0.0001; and 74% [64 to 81%], P = 0.0001 in the sulodexide 50, 100, and 200 mg/d groups, respectively. At T8, the sulodexide 200 mg/d group maintained a 62% (45 to 73%) AER significant reduction versus placebo (P = 0.0001). Subanalysis by type of diabetes (DM1 versus DM2, microalbuminuric versus macroalbuminuric, or on concomitant ACE inhibitors versus not on ACE inhibitors) demonstrated similar findings. These effects were obtained without any significant variation in metabolic control and BP or serum creatinine. Very few adverse events were reported; none were serious. In conclusion, a 4-mo course of high doses of sulodexide significantly and dose-dependently improves albuminuria in DM1 and DM2 patients and micro- or macroalbuminuric patients with or without concomitant ACE inhibition. The effect on albuminuria is long-lasting and seemingly additive to the ACE inhibitory effect.     

Dual inhibition with losartan and aliskiren: a promising therapeutic option for type 2 diabetic nephropathy?

This Practice Point commentary discusses the findings and limitations of a randomized, double-blind study conducted by Parving and colleagues. The study evaluated the renoprotective effects of dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system by adding aliskiren (an oral, direct renin inhibitor) or placebo to treatment with 100 mg daily losartan in patients who had hypertension and type 2 diabetes with nephropathy. Addition of daily aliskiren for 6 months (150 mg/day for 3 months and 300 mg/day for 3 months) reduced the mean urinary albumin:creatinine ratio by 20% (P <0.001), with a reduction of 50% or more in 24.7% of the patients who received aliskiren versus only 12.5% of those who received placebo (P <0.001). At study end, mean blood pressure levels were only slightly lower in the aliskiren group than in the placebo group (2/1 mmHg lower). The authors concluded that aliskiren might have renoprotective effects that are independent of its blood-pressure-lowering effect in patients who have hypertension, type 2 diabetes and nephropathy and are receiving the recommended renoprotective treatment.     

舒洛地特对糖尿病肾病患者尿蛋白的影响

目的：观察舒洛地特对已应用ACEI/ARB类药物的2型糖尿病肾病患者尿蛋白的影响。方法：据尿白蛋白排泄率将92例2型糖尿病肾病患者分为微量白蛋白尿组和大量白蛋白尿组,患者在入组前至少服用一种ACEI或ARB类降压药6个月,入组后先接受10d舒洛地特注射剂60mg/d静脉滴注,再接受110d舒洛地特软胶囊100mg/d口服。用药前、用药4周、8周、12周及120d分别检测患者血压、空腹血糖、肝肾功能、凝血功能、24h尿蛋白定量等指标。结果：两组患者治疗12周后均出现尿蛋白显著降低（P0.05）。结论：对已应用ACEI/ARB的伴有微量白蛋白尿或大量白蛋白尿的2型DN患者,舒洛地特能有效降低其尿蛋白。     

The long-term outcome of patients with IgA nephropathy treated with fish oil in a controlled trial. Mayo Nephrology Collaborative Group.

It was reported previously that dietary fish oil supplementation retarded the progression of renal disease in patients with IgA nephropathy in a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, 2-yr clinical trial. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term influence of fish oil treatment on renal progression in observations on the study cohort of 106 patients extending beyond the 2-yr trial. Renal function was assessed by serial serum creatinine and 24-h urine protein measurements. Vital, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and BP status and treatment beyond completion of the 2-yr trial were determined. As in the trial, the primary end point was an increase of 50% or more in the serum creatinine, and the secondary end point was ESRD. After a mean follow-up of 6.4 yr, 46 patients-17 in the fish oil group versus 29 in the placebo group-reached the primary end point (P = 0.002), and 27 patients-eight in the fish oil group versus 19 in the placebo group-developed ESRD (P = 0.009). At the end of the 2-yr trial, 75 patients (45 fish oil, 30 placebo) remained at risk for the primary end point. This is also when the double-blind part of the trial ended, allowing physicians to stop supplements, switch original placebo-assigned patients to fish oil, and continue fish oil in original fish oil-assigned patients. A significantly greater number of nonsupplemented placebo patients developed the primary end point (P = 0.02) and ESRD (P = 0.003) compared with long-term supplemented fish oil patients. Conversely, more fish oil-supplemented patients had stable renal function than nonsupplemented patients (P = 0.02). By intention, BP control, primarily treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, was equal in the fish oil and placebo groups. Proteinuria was modestly reduced in both groups. It is concluded that early and prolonged treatment with fish oil slows renal progression for high-risk patients with IgA nephropathy.     

Renoprotection of Optimal Antiproteinuric Doses (ROAD) Study: a randomized controlled study of benazepril and losartan in chronic renal insufficiency

The Renoprotection of Optimal Antiproteinuric Doses (ROAD) study was performed to determine whether titration of benazepril or losartan to optimal antiproteinuric doses would safely improve the renal outcome in chronic renal insufficiency. A total of 360 patients who did not have diabetes and had proteinuria and chronic renal insufficiency were randomly assigned to four groups. Patients received open-label treatment with a conventional dosage of benazepril (10 mg/d), individual uptitration of benazepril (median 20 mg/d; range 10 to 40), a conventional dosage of losartan (50 mg/d), or individual uptitration of losartan (median 100 mg/d; range 50 to 200). Uptitration was performed to optimal antiproteinuric and tolerated dosages, and then these dosages were maintained. Median follow-up was 3.7 yr. The primary end point was time to the composite of a doubling of the serum creatinine, ESRD, or death. Secondary end points included changes in the level of proteinuria and the rate of progression of renal disease. Compared with the conventional dosages, optimal antiproteinuric dosages of benazepril and losartan that were achieved through uptitration were associated with a 51 and 53% reduction in the risk for the primary end point (P = 0.028 and 0.022, respectively). Optimal antiproteinuric dosages of benazepril and losartan, at comparable BP control, achieved a greater reduction in both proteinuria and the rate of decline in renal function compared with their conventional dosages. There was no significant difference for the overall incidence of major adverse events between groups that were given conventional and optimal dosages in both arms. It is concluded that uptitration of benazepril or losartan against proteinuria conferred further benefit on renal outcome in patients who did not have diabetes and had proteinuria and renal insufficiency.     

Randomized trial of an inhibitor of formation of advanced glycation end products in diabetic nephropathy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pimagedine inhibits the formation of advanced glycation end products and slows the progression of diabetic complications in experimental models. This study was undertaken to determine if pimagedine ameliorates nephropathy in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study performed in 690 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, nephropathy, and retinopathy. The patients received twice daily dosing with placebo, pimagedine 150 mg, or pimagedine 300 mg for 2-4 years. The primary end point was the time to doubling of serum creatinine; the secondary end points included evaluations of proteinuria, kidney function, and retinopathy. RESULTS: Serum creatinine doubled in 26% (61/236) of the placebo-treated patients and in 20% (91/454) of those who received pimagedine (p = 0.099). The estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased more slowly in the pimagedine-treated patients with a 36-month decrease from baseline of 6.26 ml/min/1.73 m(2) as compared with 9.80 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in the placebo-treated patients (p = 0.05), and pimagedine reduced the 24-hour total urinary proteinuria. (The mean reduction from baseline at month 36 was 732 mg/24 h at the low dose and 329 mg/24 h at the high dose as compared with 35 mg/24 h in the placebo group; p 相似文献   

Randomized Placebo-Controlled EPPIC Trials of AST-120 in CKD

Reduced GFR in patients with CKD causes systemic accumulation of uremic toxins, which has been correlated with disease progression and increased morbidity. The orally administered spherical carbon adsorbent AST-120 reduces systemic toxin absorption through gastrointestinal sequestration, which may slow disease progression in these patients. The multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Evaluating Prevention of Progression in CKD (EPPIC)-1 and EPPIC-2 trials evaluated the effects of AST-120 on the progression of CKD when added to standard therapy. We randomly assigned 2035 adults with moderate to severe disease (serum creatinine at screening, 2.0–5.0 mg/dl for men and 1.5–5.0 mg/dl for women) to receive either placebo or AST-120 (9 g/d). The primary end point was a composite of dialysis initiation, kidney transplantation, and serum creatinine doubling. Each trial continued until accrual of 291 primary end points. The time to primary end point was similar between the AST-120 and the placebo groups in both trials (EPPIC-1: hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.27; P=0.78) (EPPIC-2: hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.12; P=0.37); a pooled analysis of both trials showed similar results. The estimated median time to primary end points for the placebo groups was 124 weeks for power calculations, but actual times were 189.0 and 170.3 weeks for EPPIC-1 and EPPIC-2, respectively. Thus, disease progression was more gradual than expected in the trial populations. In conclusion, the benefit of adding AST-120 to standard therapy in patients with moderate to severe CKD is not supported by these data.     

Exacerbation of radiocontrast nephrotoxicity by endothelin receptor antagonism

BACKGROUND: Endothelin is a potent vasoconstrictor that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of radiocontrast nephrotoxicity. Endothelin antagonists may reduce the renal hemodynamic abnormalities following radiocontrast administration. METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight patients with chronic renal insufficiency [mean serum creatinine +/- SD = 2.7 +/- 1.0 mg/dL (242. 3 to +/- 92.8 micromol/L)] and undergoing cardiac angiography were randomized to receive either a mixed endothelin A and B receptor antagonist, SB 290670, or placebo. All patients received intravenous hydration with 0.45% saline before and after radiocontrast administration. Serum creatinine concentrations were measured at baseline, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 3 to 5 days after radiocontrast administration. The primary end point was the mean change in serum creatinine concentration from baseline at 48 hours; the secondary end point was the incidence of radiocontrast nephrotoxicity, defined as an increase in serum creatinine of > or =0.5 mg/dL (44 micromol/L) or > or = 25% from baseline within 48 hours of radiocontrast administration. RESULTS: The mean increase in serum creatinine 48 hours after angiography was higher in the SB 209670 group [0.7 +/- 0. 7 mg/dL (63.5 +/- 58.6 micromol/L)] than in the placebo group [0.4 +/- 0.6 mg/dL (33.6 +/- 55.1 micromol/L), P = 0.002]. The incidence of radiocontrast nephrotoxicity was also higher in the SB 209670 group (56%) compared with placebo (29%, P = 0.002). This negative effect of SB 209670 was apparent in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Adverse effects, especially hypotension or decreased blood pressure, were more common in the SB 209670 group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic renal insufficiency who were undergoing cardiac angiography, endothelin receptor antagonism with SB 209670 and intravenous hydration exacerbate radiocontrast nephrotoxicity compared with hydration alone.     

Treating anemia early in renal failure patients slows the decline of renal function: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin is known to improve outcomes in patients with anemia from chronic renal disease. However, there is uncertainty about the optimal timing of initiation of erythropoietin treatment in predialysis patients with non-severe anemia. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of early versus deferred initiation of erythropoietin in nondiabetic predialysis patients with serum creatinine 2 to 6 mg/dL and hemoglobin 9 to 11.6 g/dL. The early treatment arm was immediately started on 50 U/kg/wk of erythropoietin alpha with appropriate titration aiming for hemoglobin of > or =13 g/dL. The deferred treatment arm would start erythropoietin only when hemoglobin decreased to <9 g/dL. The primary end point was a composite of doubling of creatinine, renal replacement, or death. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were randomized (early treatment N= 45, deferred treatment N= 43) and followed for a median of 22.5 months. During follow-up, 13 versus 23 patients reached the primary end point in the two arms, respectively (log-rank P= 0.0078). The relative hazard for reaching an end point was 0.42 (P= 0.012). Adjusting for baseline serum creatinine, the adjusted relative hazard was 0.37 (P= 0.004), while the risk increased 2.23-fold (P < 0.001) per 1 mg/dL higher creatinine at baseline. The benefit was similar regardless of the baseline hemoglobin and proteinuria. No patients had any severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: Early initiation of erythropoietin in predialysis patients with non-severe anemia significantly slows the progression of renal disease and delays the initiation of renal replacement therapy.     

Renin angiotensin aldosterone system blockade and renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: a subanalysis of Japanese patients from the RENAAL study

Background The Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study has previously shown losartan to confer significant benefits to patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. The original study of 1513 patients included 96 Japanese patients; the present study is a post-hoc analysis of the effects of losartan in this Japanese subpopulation. Methods This double-blind, randomized study compared losartan (50 to 100 mg once daily) with placebo. The study medication was taken in addition to conventional antihypertensive treatment, and the mean follow-up period for the Japanese patients was 2.8 years. The primary endpoint was the composite of doubling of serum creatinine, endstage renal disease, or death. Secondary endpoints included changes in proteinuria levels. Safety was also evaluated. Results The primary composite endpoint was reached in fewer Japanese patients receiving losartan than placebo (50.0% versus 65.4%, respectively). The treatment effects of losartan were more robust when data were corrected for differences in proteinuria at baseline – a significant relative risk reduction of 45% with losartan (P = 0.0397) was apparent. Treatment benefit exceeded that attributable to blood pressure changes alone. Levels of proteinuria were reduced with losartan compared with placebo, with an overall losartan treatment effect of 37.8% (P < 0.001). Overall, losartan was similarly well tolerated in both the Japanese patients and the total population. Conclusions In Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy, losartan offers renal protection and is generally well tolerated.     

Effects of vitamin E on cardiovascular outcomes in people with mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency: results of the HOPE study

BACKGROUND: A controlled trial reported cardiovascular benefits of vitamin E in terminal renal insufficiency. There are no data for renal insufficiency before the stage of terminal renal failure. We evaluated effects of vitamin E supplementation on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in 993 people with a serum creatinine > or =1.4 to 2.3 mg/dL. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of a randomized trial that compared treatment with natural source vitamin E (400 IU/day) to placebo in 9541 people, 993 of which had renal insufficiency. Participants had either known cardiovascular disease or diabetes and at least one additional coronary risk factor. Exclusion criteria included a serum creatinine > 2.3 mg/dL and dipstick-positive proteinuria. The primary study outcome after an average of 4.5 years was the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death. Secondary outcomes included revascularizations, total mortality, and clinical proteinuria. RESULTS: In renal insufficiency, vitamin E supplementation had a neutral effect on the primary study outcome, on each component of the composite primary outcome, and on all secondary outcomes. Two hundred twenty-four primary outcomes, 23% of the vitamin E group and 22.1% of the placebo group, relative risk 1.03 (95% CI, 0.79-1.34; P= 0.82), were observed, and 585 secondary outcomes, including death in 17% and 18.8% of the vitamin E and placebo groups, respectively (RR 0.88, 95% CI, 0.66-1.18; P= 0.40). There was no effect of vitamin E on progression of proteinuria. CONCLUSION: In people with mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency at high cardiovascular risk, vitamin E at a dose of 400 IU/day had no apparent effect on cardiovascular outcomes.     

Risk factors for reaching renal endpoints in the assessment of Lescol in renal transplantation (ALERT) trial

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to identity risk factors for long-term renal transplant function and development of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in renal transplant recipients included in the Assessment of Lescol in Renal Transplantation (ALERT) trial. METHODS: The ALERT trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effect of fluvastatin, 40 and 80 mg/day, in renal transplant recipients who were randomized to receive fluvastatin (Lescol) (n = 1,050) or placebo (n = 1,052) over 5 to 6 years of follow-up. Renal endpoints including graft loss or doubling of serum creatinine or death were analyzed by univariate and multivariate regression analysis in the placebo group. RESULTS: There were 137 graft losses (13.5%) in the placebo group, mainly caused by CAN (82%). Univariate risk factors for graft loss or doubling of serum creatinine were as follows: serum creatinine, proteinuria, hypertension, pulse pressure, time since transplantation, donor age, human leukocyte antigen-DR mismatches, treatment for rejection, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and smoking. Multivariate analysis revealed independent risk factors for graft loss as follows: serum creatinine (relative risk [RR], 3.12 per 100-microM increase), proteinuria (RR, 1.64 per 1-g/24 hr increase), and pulse pressure (RR, 1.12 per 10 mm Hg), whereas age was a protective factor. With patient death in the composite endpoint, diabetes mellitus, smoking, age, and number of transplantations were also risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Independent risk factors for graft loss or doubling of serum creatinine or patient death are mainly related to renal transplant function, proteinuria, and blood pressure, which emphasizes the importance of renoprotective treatment regimens in this population.     

Comparison between valsartan and valsartan plus cilnidipine in type II diabetics with normo- and microalbuminuria

Cilnidipine, an L-/N-type calcium channel blocker, dilates the efferent glomerular arterioles in an experimental model and shows a renoprotective effect, but its clinical benefits and safety have not yet been assessed in type II diabetics with albuminuria. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the effect of reducing albuminuria in type II diabetic patients with a combination therapy consisting of valsartan plus cilnidipine versus monotherapy with valsartan. An open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted from April 2002 to October 2003 in 87 Japanese patients aged 31-90 years with type II diabetes showing albuminuria (urinary albumin/creatinine ratio: 10-300 mg/g). The patients were randomized to receive either valsartan (n=41) or valsartan plus cilnidipine (n=46) once daily for 1 year. The primary end point was the percent change in the albumin/creatinine ratio. The secondary end points were the progression/regression of albuminuria, blood pressure (BP), renal function, and safety. After 1 year, the albumin/creatinine ratio was found to have decreased more markedly in the valsartan plus cilnidipine group than in the valsartan group (reduction rate -44+/-11% (s.e.) versus -9+/-7% (s.e.); P=0.014 by analysis of covariance). Although a significant reduction was observed in the systolic and diastolic BP of both groups from baseline to 1 year (P<0.0001, respectively), there was no significant difference in the change in the BP between the two groups (systolic BP, P=0.066; diastolic BP, P=0.391). There were also no significant differences in the side effects between the two groups. Cilnidipine was thus found to show an additive effect with valsartan and thereby caused a reduction in albuminuria in type II diabetics.     

Risk factors for renal dysfunction in type 2 diabetes: U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study 74

Not all patients with type 2 diabetes develop renal dysfunction. Identifying those at risk is problematic because even microalbuminuria, often used clinically as an indicator of future renal dysfunction, does not always precede worsening renal function. We sought to identify clinical risk factors at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes associated with later development of renal dysfunction. Of 5,102 U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) participants, prospective analyses were undertaken in those without albuminuria (n = 4,031) or with normal plasma creatinine (n=5,032) at diagnosis. Stepwise proportional hazards multivariate regression was used to assess association of putative baseline risk factors with subsequent development of albuminuria (microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria) or renal impairment (Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance <60 ml/min or doubling of plasma creatinine). Over a median of 15 years of follow-up 1,544 (38%) of 4,031 patients developed albuminuria and 1,449 (29%) of 5,032 developed renal impairment. Of 4,006 patients with the requisite data for both outcomes, 1,534 (38%) developed albuminuria and 1,132 (28%) developed renal impairment. Of the latter, 575 (51%) did not have preceding albuminuria. Development of albuminuria or renal impairment was independently associated with increased baseline systolic blood pressure, urinary albumin, plasma creatinine, and Indian-Asian ethnicity. Additional independent risk factors for albuminuria were male sex, increased waist circumference, plasma triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, HbA(1c) (A1C), increased white cell count, ever having smoked, and previous retinopathy. Additional independent risk factors for renal impairment were female sex, decreased waist circumference, age, increased insulin sensitivity, and previous sensory neuropathy. Over a median of 15 years from diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, nearly 40% of UKPDS patients developed albuminuria and nearly 30% developed renal impairment. Distinct sets of risk factors are associated with the development of these two outcomes, consistent with the concept that they are not linked inexorably in type 2 diabetes.     

Safety and efficacy of risedronate in patients with age-related reduced renal function as estimated by the Cockcroft and Gault method: a pooled analysis of nine clinical trials.

The incidences of osteoporosis and renal insufficiency increase with age. We studied the influence of renal function on the safety and efficacy of risedronate 5 mg daily in osteoporotic women. Risedronate was safe and effective in osteoporotic women with mild, moderate, or severe age-related renal impairment. INTRODUCTION: The incidences of both osteoporosis and renal insufficiency increase with age; thus, the effect of renal impairment on the safety and efficacy of osteoporosis treatments is a clinical concern. Risedronate is a pyridinyl bisphosphonate well established as safe and effective in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Currently, there is little available information about the effect of bisphosphonate treatment in patients with renal insufficiency. This retrospective analysis was conducted to study the influence of renal function on the safety and efficacy of risedronate in a population of osteoporotic women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Combined data from nine randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III risedronate trials were analyzed. The patients in these studies had no markedly abnormal laboratory parameters that were considered clinically significant and no evidence of significant disease. This analysis included patients who received placebo (n = 4,500) or risedronate 5 mg (n = 4,496) for up to 3 years (average duration of exposure, 2 years) and who had renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CrCl] < 80 ml/min). CrCl was estimated by the Cockcroft and Gault method, based on age, weight, and serum creatinine. Patients were categorized as having mild (CrCl >or=50 to <80 ml/min), moderate (CrCl >or=30 to <50 ml/min), or severe (CrCl < 30 ml/min) renal impairment. RESULTS: Of the patients studied, renal impairment at baseline was mild in 48% (mean [range] serum creatinine, 0.9 [0.4-1.6] mg/dl), moderate in 45% (1.1 [0.6-1.9] mg/dl), and severe in 7% (1.3 [0.7-2.7] mg/dl). In both the placebo and risedronate treatment groups, the patients with the most severe renal impairment were older and had more severe osteoporosis. The incidences of overall adverse events and of renal function-related adverse events were similar in the placebo and risedronate 5 mg groups regardless of renal function. Furthermore, evaluation of changes from baseline in serum creatinine revealed no difference in renal function between the placebo and risedronate 5 mg groups in any of the renal impairment subgroups at any time-point. In all three subgroups, risedronate effectively preserved BMD and reduced the incidence of vertebral fractures. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that risedronate is safe and effective in osteoporotic women with age-related mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment.