Can frailty predict complicated care needs and length of stay?

The Reported Edmonton Frail Scale was used to describe the prevalence of frailty in an acute general medical unit. The relationship between frailty, discharge destination, mortality and length of hospital stay was explored. We found that age was associated with frailty, and frailty correlated to an increasing length of hospital stay. Significantly, frailty was associated with complexity in discharge, and this process created a longer length of hospital stay.     

Covid-19 and the next outbreak: decreasing frailty by using mild stress?

The coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) has resulted in many deaths, particularly of very old or obese people. These people are at risk to die in the event of an outbreak, like under one-year old babies were at risk to die one century ago from various diseases. It is argued that mild stress could help people to resist new outbreaks. The people who are obese because of bad feeding habits (snacking, junk food, overfeeding) and inactivity should adopt more healthy behaviours. Because an inactive way of life at old age can increase frailty, physical and mental activities should be kept at the highest possible level in elderly people, particularly if they live in retirement homes. In the event of an outbreak, management staff of these homes should not confine residents in their room for weeks or months, as it can increase inactivity, under-nutrition, sarcopenia, and depressive symptoms. People with or without co-morbidities should be active and one could wonder whether other mild stresses such as sauna bathing could help to better resist infection.

     

Disability and co-morbidity in relation to frailty: how much do they overlap?

The purpose of this study was to examine the association of disability and co-morbidity with frailty in older adults. 2305 participants aged 65+ from the second wave of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA), a prospective population-based cohort study, comprised the study sample. Following a standard procedure, two different frailty index (FI) measures were constructed from 37 deficits by dividing the recorded deficits by the total number of measures. One version excluded disability and co-morbidity items, the other included them. Time to death was measured for up to five years. Frailty was defined using either the frailty phenotype or a cut-point applied to each FI. Of people defined as frail using the frailty phenotype, 15/416 (3.6%) experienced neither disability nor co-morbidity. Using 0.25 as the cut-point score for the FI (without disability/co-morbidity) resulted in 101/1176 (8.6%) frail participants that had neither disability nor co-morbidity. Activities of daily living (ADL) limitations and co-morbidities occurred more often among people with the highest levels of frailty. The first ADLs to become impaired with increasing frailty were bathing, managing medication, and cooking with more than 25% of older adults with a FI score (without disability/co-morbidity) >0.22 experiencing dependency on them. The hazard ratio (HR) per 0.1 increase in FI score was 1.25 (95% CI: 1.20-1.30) when disability and co-morbidity were included in the index and 1.21 (1.16-1.25) when they were not included. In conclusion, disability and co-morbidity greatly overlap with other deficits that might be used to define frailty and add to their ability to predict mortality.     

Do frailty and cognitive impairment affect dual-task cost during walking in the oldest old institutionalized patients?

The objective of this study was to investigate dual-task costs in several elderly populations, including robust oldest old, frail oldest old with MCI, frail oldest old without MCI, and frail elderly with dementia. Sixty-four elderly men and women categorized into frail without MCI (age 93.4 ± 3.2 years, n = 20), frail with MCI (age 92.4 ± 4.2 years, n = 13), robust (age 88.2 ± 4.1 years, n = 10), and patients with dementia (age 88.1 ± 5.1 years, n = 21). Five-meter gait ability and timed-up-and-go (TUG) tests with single and dual-task performance were assessed in the groups. Dual-task cost in both 5-m habitual gait velocity test and TUG test was calculated by the time differences between single and dual-task performance. The robust group exhibited better 5-m gait and TUG test performances in the single and dual-task conditions compared with the other three groups (P < 0.001), and the frail and frail + MCI groups exhibited better performances than the dementia group (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the frail and frail + MCI groups. However, all groups exhibited lower gait velocities in the verbal and arithmetic task conditions, but the dual-task cost of the groups were similar. Robust individuals exhibited superior single and dual-task walking performances than the other three groups, and the frail and frail + MCI individuals exhibited performances that were superior to those of the patients with dementia. However, the dual-task costs, i.e., the changes in gait performance when elderly participants switch from a single to a dual task, were similar among all four of the investigated groups. Therefore, these results demonstrated that the magnitude of the impairment in gait pattern is independent of frailty and cognitive impairment status.     

What would make a definition of frailty successful?

At present, frailty is defined variably. Some consensus on a definition is likely to emerge, but the basis for a successful definition needs to be explored. Here, a classic approach to validation is proposed: a successful definition of frailty should be multifactorial but must also manage the many factors in a way that takes their interactions into account. It is likely to be correlated with disability, co-morbidity and self-rated health, and should identify a group that is vulnerable to adverse outcomes. Ideally, it should also be susceptible to animal modelling. In that frailty and age are so bound together, it is also likely that there will be some age at which virtually all people will be frail, by any definition. Apart from being valid, the success of any definition of frailty will depend on it being useful to researchers and clinicians. The need for progress on our understanding of frailty is evident, but for now, there is insufficient evidence to accept a single definition of frailty.     

Is grip strength a useful single marker of frailty?

BACKGROUND: chronological age is widely used as a marker of frailty in clinical practice. However there can be wide variation in frailty between individuals of a similar age. Grip strength is a powerful predictor of disability, morbidity and mortality which has been used in a number of frailty scores but not as a single marker of frailty. OBJECTIVE: to investigate the potential of grip strength as a single marker of frailty in older people of similar chronological age. DESIGN: cross-sectional study with prospective collection of mortality data. SETTING: North Hertfordshire, UK. SUBJECTS: 717 men and women, aged 64-74, born and still living in North Hertfordshire, who took part in a previous study to investigate the relationship between size at birth and ageing processes in later life. METHODS: the number of significant associations between grip strength and the ageing markers was compared with numbers between chronological age and the ageing markers. RESULTS: in men, lower grip strength correlated significantly with ten ageing markers compared to chronological age which was significantly associated with seven. In women, there were six significant relationships for grip compared to three for age. The greater number of relationships between grip strength and ageing markers was not explained by the association between grip strength and age, and remained after adjustment for adult size. CONCLUSIONS: grip strength was associated with more markers of frailty than chronological age within the narrow age range studied. Grip strength may prove a more useful single marker of frailty for older people of similar age than chronological age alone. Its validity in a clinical setting needs to be tested.     

Protocol for the FACE study: frailty and comorbidity in elderly patients——a multicenter,Chinese observational cohort study

The present protocol describes an observational cohort study that was designed to propose a therapeutic scheme and formulate an individualized treatment strategy for frail elderly patients diagnosed with multiple diseases in a Chinese, multicenter setting. Over a 3-year period, we will recruit 30,000 patients from 10 hospitals and collect baseline data including patient demographic information, comorbidity characteristic, FRAIL scale, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index(aCCI), relevant blood...     

The interpretation of social comparison and its relation to life satisfaction among elderly people: does frailty make a difference?

We examined the interpretation of upward and downward social comparison and its effect on life satisfaction in a questionnaire study among 444 community-dwelling elderly persons with different levels of frailty. As we expected, elderly persons with higher levels of frailty were less inclined to contrast and more inclined to identify themselves with a downward comparison target. Furthermore, they were more inclined to contrast themselves with an upward comparison target, but contrary to our expectations, they were also more inclined to identify with this target. Upward identification and downward contrast related positively, whereas upward contrast and downward identification related negatively to life satisfaction. These effects existed independently of the negative effect of frailty on life satisfaction.     

How to assess frailty and the need for care? Report from the Study of Health and Drugs in the Elderly (SHADES) in community dwellings in Sweden

Knowledge about the need for care of elderly individuals in community dwellings and the factors affecting their needs and support is limited. The aim of this study was to characterize the frailty of a population of elderly individuals living in community dwellings in Sweden in relation to co-morbidity, use of drugs, and risk of severe conditions such as malnutrition, pressure ulcers, and falls. In 2008, 315 elderly individuals living in community dwellings were interviewed and examined as part of the SHADES-study. The elderly demonstrated co-morbidity (a mean of three diseases) and polypharmacy (an average of seven drugs). More than half the sample was at risk for malnutrition, one third was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, and nearly all (93%) had an increased risk of falling and a great majority had cognitive problems. Age, pulse pressure, body mass index, and specific items from the modified Norton scale (MNS), the Downton fall risk index (DFRI), and the mini nutritional assessment (MNA-SF) were related to different outcomes, defining the need for care and frailty. Based on the results of this study, we suggest a single set of items useful for understanding the need for care and to improve individual based care in community dwellings.     

Is frailty associated with short-term outcomes for elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome?

Background Frailty is a new prognostic factor in cardiovascular medicine due to the aging and increasingly complex nature of elderly patients. It is useful and meaningful to prospectively analyze the manner in which frailty predicts short-term outcomes for elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods Patients aged ? 65 years, with diagnosis of ACS from cardiology department and geriatrics department were included from single-center. Clinical data including geriatrics syndromes were collected using Comprehensive Geriatrics Assessment. Frailty was defined according to the Clinical Frailty Scale and the impact of the co-morbidities on risk was quantified by the coronary artery disease (CAD)—specific index. Patients were followed up by clinical visit or telephone consultation and the median follow-up time is 120 days. Following-up items included all-cause mortality, unscheduled return visit, in-hospital and recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events. Multivariable regression survival analysis was performed using Cox regression. Results Of the 352 patients, 152 (43.18%) were considered frail according to the study instrument (5?7 on the scale), and 93 (26.42%) were considered moderately or severely frail (6?7 on the scale). Geriatrics syndromes including incontinence, fall history, visual impairment, hearing impairment, constipation, chronic pain, sleeping disorder, dental problems, anxiety or depression, and delirium were more frequently in frail patients than in non-frail patients (P = 0.000, 0.031, 0.009, 0.014, 0.000, 0.003, 0.022, 0.000, 0.074, and 0.432, respectively). Adjusted for sex, age, severity of coronary artery diseases (left main coronary artery lesion or not) and co-morbidities (CAD specific index) by Cox survival analysis, frailty was found to be strongly and independently associated with risk for the primary composite outcomes: all-cause mortality [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 5.393; 95% CI: 1.477?19.692, P = 0.011] and unscheduled return visit (HR = 2.832; 95% CI: 1.140?7.037, P = 0.025). Conclusions Comprehensive Geriatrics Assessment and Clinical Frail Scale were useful in evaluation of elderly patients with ACS. Frailty was strongly and independently associated with short-term outcomes for elderly patients with ACS.     

Poor mobility independently predicts mortality in TAVI: Are we closer to a universal definition for frailty?

• Frailty assessment aids appropriate patient selection for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). An uncumbersome and easy to use evaluation tool is needed to facilitate wider uptake among TAVI teams.
• Mobility assessment by the euroSCORE definition can be utilized as a one‐point measure and may be indicative of short‐ and long‐term outcomes post TAVI.
• Frailty is an evolving concept and further data are warranted, with validation across regions to determine a gold standard.