Cardiovascular risk assessment scores for people with diabetes: a systematic review

People with type 2 diabetes have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Multivariate cardiovascular risk scores have been used in many countries to identify individuals who are at high risk of CVD. These risk scores include those originally developed in individuals with diabetes and those developed in a general population. This article reviews the published evidence for the performance of CVD risk scores in diabetic patients by: (1) examining the overall rationale for using risk scores; (2) systematically reviewing the literature on available scores; and (3) exploring methodological issues surrounding the development, validation and comparison of risk scores. The predictive performance of cardiovascular risk scores varies substantially between different populations. There is little evidence to suggest that risk scores developed in individuals with diabetes estimate cardiovascular risk more accurately than those developed in the general population. The inconsistency in the methods used in evaluation studies makes it difficult to compare and summarise the predictive ability of risk scores. Overall, CVD risk scores rank individuals reasonably accurately and are therefore useful in the management of diabetes with regard to targeting therapy to patients at highest risk. However, due to the uncertainty in estimation of true risk, care is needed when using scores to communicate absolute CVD risk to individuals.     

Diabetes and cardiovascular disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most frequent and costly complication of type 2 diabetes. In this review, we examine the impact of diabetes on CVD. Shedding some light on the diabetes/CVD relationship are epidemiologic studies, which focused on Native Americans, who collectively experienced little or no diabetes or CVD in the past, but experience both conditions in epidemic proportions today. Almost half of the Native Americans studied had diabetes at baseline. When CVD events were stratified by diabetic status, the relative CVD risk among diabetic men was twice that of nondiabetic men, and the risk among diabetic women was threefold that of nondiabetic women. Among all CVD events, diabetes accounted for 56% in men and 78% in women; most CVD deaths occurred in those with diabetes. Recent attention has focused on defining the relative strength of CVD risk factors in diabetic populations. In many populations, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is lower in diabetic individuals. However, in American Indians, every 10-mg/dL increase in LDL cholesterol has been associated with a 12% increase in CVD risk and every 10-mg/dL decrease in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was associated with an 8% increase in CVD risk. Albuminuria is an important predictor of CVD in diabetic populations. Those with macroalbuminuria had a CVD risk that was four to five times that of diabetic individuals without albuminuria. Other CVD risk factors in diabetes that have come under recent scrutiny in other populations are increased levels of fibrinogin, and C-reactive protein, and leukocytosis. Angiogenic response may be lower in diabetic individuals, and the possible role of infection is being examined in diabetic patients. LDL cholesterol and albuminuria should be the targets of preventive strategies, and promising new areas such as cytokines, growth factor, and the role of infection should be further explored.     

Cardiovascular Disease Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

There is an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality and morbidity in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus compared with the general population as shown by epidemiologic studies measuring cardiovascular endpoints, as well as by autopsy, angiographic, and coronary calcification studies. Most of the excess CVD risk associated with type 1 diabetes is concentrated in the subset of approximately 35% of patients who develop diabetic nephropathy (after 20 years of diabetes duration), who also typically have dyslipidemias, elevated blood pressure, and hyperglycemia, factors contributing to CVD. For reasons that remain speculative, the relative risks from CVD are higher in women than in men with type 1 diabetes compared with the general population, which effectively eliminates the gender differences in CVD. As in the general population and in patients with type 2 diabetes, education and lifestyle changes, interventions to reduce hyperglycemia, blood pressure, micro-albuminuria, lipid control, and the use of aspirin are important management areas in order to reduce the increased risk of CVD. Whether management with aspirin and statins should be started in type 1 diabetic patients at a younger age or at a lower risk score than in the general population is still under investigation. There is a need for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of vascular complications in type 1 diabetes, more specific risk engines in type 1 diabetes, and accurate estimations of the absolute and relative risk for CVD in order to improve management of CVD in these high-risk patients.     

Approaches to Decongestion in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Type 2 diabetes increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) from two- to four-fold. In our large Finnish population-based study published in 1998 subjects with medication for type 2 diabetes had as high a risk of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) during the 7- year follow-up as non-diabetic subjects with a prior MI, suggesting that type 2 diabetes is a CVD equivalent. In another large study, including all 3.3 million residents of Denmark, subjects requiring glucose-lowering therapy exhibited a CVD risk similar to that of non-diabetic subjects with a prior MI. Subsequent studies have not systematically replicated aforementioned results. Some studies have supported the concept that type 2 diabetes is a CVD equivalent only in some subgroups, and many studies have reported negative findings. This is likely to be due to many differences across the studies published, for example ethnicity, gender, age and other demographic factors of the populations involved, study design, validation of diabetes status and CVD events, statistical analyses (adjustments for confounding factors), duration of diabetes, and treatment of hyperglycemia among diabetic participants. Varying results reflect the fact that not all diabetic patients are at a similar risk for CVD. Therefore, CVD risk assessment and the tailoring of preventive measures should be done individually, taking into consideration each patient’s long-term risk of developing cardiovascular events.     

The Evolving Cardiovascular Disease Risk Scores for Persons with Diabetes Mellitus

Purpose of Review

We briefly introduce the concept and use of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk scores and review the methodology for CVD risk score development and validation in patients with diabetes. We also discuss CVD risk scores for diabetic patients that have been developed in different countries.

Recent Findings

Patients with diabetes have a gradient of CVD risk that needs to be accurately assessed. Numerous CVD risk scores for diabetic patients have been created in various settings. The methods to develop risk scores are highly diverse and each choice has its own pros and cons. A well-constructed risk score for diabetic patients may be advocated by guidelines and adopted by healthcare providers to help determine preventive strategies. New risk factors are being investigated in order to improve the predictive accuracy of current risk scores.

Summary

A suitable CVD risk score for the diabetes population should be accurate, low-cost, and beneficial to outcome. While the performance (accuracy) has all been internally validated, validation on external populations is still needed. Cost-effectiveness and clinical trials demonstrating improvement in outcomes are limited and should be the target of future research.

     

The effect of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon‐like peptide 1 agonists on cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes

Patients with type 2 diabetes have a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to the general population—with CVD accounting for two out of every three deaths in patients with diabetes. In 2008, the FDA suggested that CVD risk should be evaluated for any new antidiabetic therapy, leading to a multitude of large CVD outcome trials to assess CVD risk from these medications. Interestingly, several of these outcome trials with new novel antidiabetic therapies have demonstrated a clear and definite CVD advantage at mid‐term follow up in high‐risk patients with T2DM. In this review, we discuss two relatively new classes of diabetic drugs, sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon‐like peptide 1 agonists, and their efficacy in improving cardiovascular outcomes.     

Influence of cardiovascular diseases upon the results of the cardiovascular reflex tests in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects

Summary Cardiovascular reflex tests are used to assess cardiac autonomic neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are known to alter baroreflex mechanisms. Diabetic patients are at a high risk for cardiovascular complications. In order to prove whether cardiovascular diseases reduce the diagnostic value of the cardiovascular reflex tests in diabetic autonomic neuropathy unselected groups of 274 nondiabetic and 103 diabetic patients were studied: E/I, 30/15, and Valsalva ratios, sustained handgrip test and blood pressure response to standing. Both groups were subdivided into young (≤45 years) and older (>45 years) patients and into subjects with and without CVD. In young nondiabetic patients with CVD, E/I and Valsalva ratios were significantly lower than in those without CVD. In young diabetic patients with CVD, only E/I ratios were significantly reduced compared to those without CVD. The tests reflecting sympathetic nerve function did not differ between patients with and without CVD, neither in the nondiabetic nor in the diabetic subjects. In the older nondiabetic and diabetic patients, cardiovascular reflexes were generally impaired, but did not show any difference between subjects with and without CVD. In young diabetic patients suffering from CVD, the diagnostic value of cardiovascular reflex tests is reduced as far as cardiac autonomic neuropathy is concerned. In older patients, the tests are not suitable for the diagnosis of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. More specific methods are required.     

New concepts in dyslipidemia in the metabolic syndrome and diabetes

Trials have revealed that cardiovascular risk is not uniform in the population, but is distributed in a "risk pyramid." Diabetic patients with prior cardiovascular disease (CVD) are at greatest risk. Nondiabetic patients with CVD, diabetic patients without CVD, and subjects with the metabolic syndrome form the next three risk categories. The presence of insulin resistance-related metabolic abnormalities is a common denominator in this risk pyramid. Insulin resistance is a core defect in type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. Because insulin resistance may cause the atherogenic dyslipidemia that is commonly associated with these conditions, therapeutic strategies that combat insulin resistance could substantially reduce cardiovascular risk. Evidence suggests that defects in mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (which may be inherited, age related, or lifestyle acquired) may play a critical role in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance. Reduced mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation can be partially reversed by improved diet, increased exercise, and administration of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha agonists (omega-3 fatty acids and fibrates). Statin therapy has demonstrated clinical benefits in insulin-resistant patients but residual cardiovascular risk remains elevated. Fibrates also improve the lipid profile and reduce cardiovascular risk in a variety of insulin-resistant populations. Affected individuals should be targeted for therapeutic lifestyle intervention. Patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia who have developed insulin resistance, the metabolic syndrome, or type 2 diabetes should receive more intensive interventions including, where appropriate, statin-fibrate combination therapy, to comprehensively modify the lipid profile together with aggressive control of blood pressure and glucose to minimize risk in this very high-risk population.     

Do people with diabetes need statins?

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus continues to increase rapidly. Persons with diabetes face a 2-fold greater absolute risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) than those without diabetes. Many diabetic patients die before reaching the hospital after a cardiovascular event. Use of statin therapy for intensive control of diabetic dyslipidemia has produced relative reductions in CVD risk of about 25% in randomized, controlled clinical trials. This is true even though low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, the primary target of statin therapy, might not be markedly elevated in diabetic patients. Most patients with diabetes or diabetes plus established CVD warrant intensive statin therapy. Statin therapy has the ability to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals recommended in treatment guidelines. Alone or in combination with an additional lipid-lowering drug, statins may also improve triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol abnormalities in patients with diabetes.     

Diabetic retinopathy is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus

Aims

We aimed to evaluate the association between diabetic microangiopathy and subclinical atherosclerosis as a marker of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

Methods

A total of 142 newly diagnosed type 2 diabetics who were free from CVD underwent evaluation of diabetic microangiopathy. Subclinical atherosclerosis was assessed by measuring carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), and the 10-year absolute risk of CVD was estimated using the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Risk Engine.

Results

Subclinical atherosclerosis was found in 27 subjects (19.0%). The rates of hypertension and diabetic retinopathy were significantly higher among patients with subclinical atherosclerosis. The UKPDS 10-year risk for CVD was significantly increased in subjects with subclinical atherosclerosis. Old age, hypertension and the presence of diabetic retinopathy showed a significant association to subclinical atherosclerosis after further adjustments for gender, body mass index, smoking status, HbA1c, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and the presence of diabetic nephropathy.

Conclusions

This study shows that diabetic retinopathy is an independent risk marker for subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. We suggest that a diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy may warrant a more careful cardiovascular assessment even in the early stages of diabetes.     

The economic consequences of diabetes and cardiovascular disease in the United States

Diabetes-related care and complications constitute a significant proportion of the United States’ (US) health care expenditure. Of these complications, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major component. Higher morbidity and mortality rates translate to higher costs of care in patients with diabetes compared to those who do not have the disease. Minorities bear a disproportionate burden of diabetes and CVD. We review this disparity and examine potential etiologies for it in Hispanics and African-Americans, the two largest minority groups in the US. We examine strategies in these populations that may improve outcomes in diabetes and CVD, potentially decreasing health care costs.     

Cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus: classical and non-classical risk factors

Cardiovascular disease, which includes coronary heart disease (CHD), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD), is the leading cause of mortality in populations, particularly in the diabetic one. Individuals with diabetes have at least a two-fold to four-fold increased risk of having cardiovascular events and a double risk of death compared with age-matched subjects without diabetes. A decline in mortality from CVD has been shown, but decline due to CHD is consistently lower in individuals with diabetes when compared with non-diabetics. The presence of several factors in diabetes leads to high occurrence of CVD such as hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, and classical and non-classical risk factors (systemic hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, proinflammatory condition and others). It is possible that the atherogenic role of obesity may be at least in part due to increased adipocyte production of cytokines. Considering the marked association of diabetes and CVD and unfavorable prognosis following an event, it is important to identify who is at high risk and how to screen. The American Heart Association and American Diabetes Association recommend risk stratification using diagnostic tests. However, the challenge is to accurately identify patients without a prior history of an event and those without symptoms strongly suggesting CVD, in whom additional testing would be indicated in order to achieve the most effective prevention. The benefits of glycemic control and the other risk factors have already been shown and justify optimization of the management of this high-risk population, aiming to reduce cardiovascular mortality disease and improve quality of life.     

Hypoglycemia, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death in people with diabetes, and the risk of CVD for adults with diabetes is at least two to four times the risk in adults without diabetes. Complications of diabetes, including not only CVD but also microvascular diseases such as retinopathy and nephropathy, are a major health and financial burden. Diabetes is a disease of glucose intolerance, and so much of the research on complications has focused on the role of hyperglycemia. Clinical trials have clearly demonstrated the role of hyperglycemia in microvascular complications of diabetes, but there appears to be less evidence for as strong of a relationship between hyperglycemia and CVD in people with diabetes. Hypoglycemia has become a more pressing health concern as intensive glycemic control has become the standard of care in diabetes. Clinical trials of intensive glucose lowering in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes populations has resulted in significantly increased hypoglycemia, with no decrease in CVD during the trial period, although several studies have shown a reduction in CVD with extended follow-up. There is evidence that hypoglycemia may adversely affect cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes, and this is one potential explanation for the lack of CVD prevention in trials of intensive glycemic control. Hypoglycemia causes a cascade of physiologic effects and may induce oxidative stress and cardiac arrhythmias, contribute to sudden cardiac death, and cause ischemic cerebral damage, presenting several potential mechanisms through which acute and chronic episodes of hypoglycemia may increase CVD risk. In this review, we examine the risk factors and prevalence of hypoglycemia in diabetes, review the evidence for an association of both acute and chronic hypoglycemia with CVD in adults with diabetes, and discuss potential mechanisms through which hypoglycemia may adversely affect cardiovascular risk.     

Insulin resistance and postprandial hyperglycemia the bad companions in natural history of diabetes: effects on health of vascular tree

In diabetic patients the incidence of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is higher compared with those without diabetes. This elevated incidence may be due to an increased prevalence of established risk factors, such as obesity, dyslipidemia and hypertension. However, several other determinants must be considered. Attention must be paid to the role that specific factors strictly related to diabetes, insulin-resistance and post-prandial hyperglycemia, play in the etiopathogenesis of CVD, as for example atherosclerosis. This review acknowledges the incidence of diabetes on cardiovascular diseases and atherosclerosis from endothelial dysfunction to plaque destabilization, suggesting that insulin resistance and postprandial hyperglycemia should be considered keys in the generation of these worst diabetic cardiovascular outcomes. It finds in hyperglycemia the primum movens that mediates the cascade of vascular damaging events from the beginning of ROS formation to plaque rupture, through increased inflammation. It also adds insights of why diverse therapeutic interventions, which have in common the ability to reduce oxidative stress and inflammation, can impede or delay the onset of complication of atherosclerosis in diabetic patients.     

Primary versus secondary cardiorenal prevention in type 2 diabetes: Which newer anti-hyperglycaemic drug matters?

We are observing a resurgence of major diabetic vascular complications after a period of dramatic decrease during the period 1990 to 2010. The classical division of cardiovascular prevention into primary (with an event) and secondary (without an event) is largely used to describe cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes (T2D); however, there is evidence that the cardiovascular risk in diabetes may range from highest in patients who experienced a previous cardiovascular event to mild in patients with the main risk factors at target. Herein, we present details of the 14 cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) published to date, including the total population investigated, and their separation into primary (T2D + multiple risk factors) and secondary prevention (T2D + established cardiovascular disease [CVD]) populations as detailed within the trials. We also summarize evidence for the effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) and sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) versus placebo on the risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE), heart failure (HF) and diabetic kidney disease (DKD). In primary prevention, SGLT-2i reduce both the risk of hospitalization for HF and progression of DKD; in secondary prevention, SGLT-2i are effective on the three endpoints, DPP-4i are neutral, while GLP1-RA show mixed results.     

Proinflammatory cytokines are increased in type 2 diabetic women with cardiovascular disease

Diabetics have a much greater morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) than nondiabetics. Furthermore, diabetic women have a 3.8-fold greater risk for CVD compared to diabetic men. Inflammation is now considered a risk factor for CVD and it has been demonstrated that inflammation also plays a role in diabetes. One component of inflammation that has reported to be increased in patients with diabetes only and CVD only are proinflammatory cytokines, particularly interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-), and interleukin-1 (IL-1β). This study was performed to test the hypothesis that these proinflammatory cytokines were increased in women with CVD and further increased in diabetic women with CVD compared to nondiabetic women with CVD and healthy age-matched controls. We found that IL-6 was increased in diabetic women with CVD compared to healthy age-matched controls (1.41=0.48 to 0.33±0.06 pg/ml, P<.05). IL-6 was also increased in diabetic women without CVD compared to healthy age-matched controls, but not significantly (0.96±0.27 to 0.33±0.06 pg/ml). We found that TNF- was increased in diabetic women with and without CVD compared to healthy age-matched controls, but not significantly (4.53±1.38 to 3.93±0.53 to 2.33±0.89 pg/ml). IL-1β was not significantly different among any of the four groups of women. These results indicate that both IL-6 and TNF- are chronically increased in diabetic women with and without CVD compared to nondiabetic women. The additive concentration of cytokines in diabetes and CVD suggests a common inflammatory state in both diabetes and CVD.     

Non-insulin-dependent Diabetes and 11-Year Mortality in Asian Indian and Melanesian Fijians

This study reports 11-year all-cause and cause-specific mortality rates according to baseline glucose tolerance for a population-based sample of adult Melanesian and Indian Fijians (n = 2638), first surveyed in 1980. Risk factors for all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM) are also described. The baseline survey included 75 g oral glucose tolerance tests, measurements of blood pressure, body mass index, and triceps skinfold, assays of plasma cholesterol and triglycerides, electrocardiograms, and details of smoking habits and physical activity. Mortality status was ascertained for 2546 subjects through surveillance of death certificates, medical records and interview of subjects (or relatives). Mortality rates were increased in diabetic men and women of both ethnic groups: relative risks compared to subjects without diabetes at baseline were 1.7 (CI:0.9–3.1) and 2.0 (1.1–3.7) in Melanesian and 4.2 (2.7–6.5), 3.2 (1.9–5.7) in Indian men and women, respectively. A large proportion of mortality among diabetic subjects was attributed to CVD (62 %, 66 % in Melanesian and 54 %, 58 % in Indian men and women, respectively). Mortality rates tended to be higher in Melanesians than Indians, except for diabetic men where Indians had higher total and cardiovascular disease rates. In contrast to non-diabetic Fijians, diabetic women of both ethnic groups lost their relative protection from coronary heart disease (CHD). Cox regressions for diabetic subjects showed age and fasting plasma glucose to be independent predictors of all-cause mortality in men, and age, body mass index (inversely) and systolic blood pressure in women, but lipid concentrations, and cigarette smoking were not related. After accounting for conventional CVD risk factors, diabetes conferred significantly increased risk of total, CVD, and CHD mortality. The mortality experience of Melanesian and Indian Fijians with NIDDM is similar to that documented in developed populations, with excess mortality due to cardiovascular causes.     

Inhibitors of advanced glycation end products (AGEs): potential utility for the treatment of cardiovascular disease

Accelerated atherosclerosis and microvascular complications are the leading causes of coronary heart disease, stroke, blindness, and end-stage renal failure, which could account for disabilities and high mortality rates in patients with diabetes. Recent clinical studies have substantiated the concept of "hyperglycemic memory" in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in diabetes. Indeed, the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial-Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT-EDIC) Research, has revealed that intensive therapy during the DCCT reduces the risk of cardiovascular events by about 50% in type 1 diabetic patients 11 years after the end of the trial. Among various biochemical pathways activated under diabetic conditions, the process of formation and accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and their mode of action are most compatible with the theory "hyperglycemic memory." Further, there is a growing body of evidence that AGEs play an important role in CVD in diabetes. These observations suggest that the inhibition of AGEs formation may be a promising target for therapeutic intervention in diabetic vascular complications. Therefore, in this article, we review several agents with inhibitory effects on AGEs formation and their therapeutic implications in CVD in diabetes.     

LDL cholesterol as a strong predictor of coronary heart disease in diabetic individuals with insulin resistance and low LDL: The Strong Heart Study

Diabetes has been shown to increase the risk of coronary heart disease in all populations studied. However, there is a lack of information on the relative importance of diabetes-associated risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), especially the role of lipid levels, because low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol often is not elevated in diabetic individuals. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate CVD risk factors in a large cohort of diabetic individuals and to compare the importance of dyslipidemia (ie, elevated triglycerides and low levels of high density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol) and LDL cholesterol in determining CVD risk in diabetic individuals. The Strong Heart Study assesses coronary heart disease and its risk factors in American Indians in Arizona, Oklahoma, and South/North Dakota. The baseline clinical examinations (July 1989 to January 1992) consisted of a personal interview, physical examination, and drawing of blood samples for 4549 study participants (2034 with diabetes), 45 to 74 years of age. Follow-up averaged 4.8 years. Fatal and nonfatal CVD events were confirmed by standardized record review. Participants with diabetes, compared with those with normal glucose tolerance, had lower LDL cholesterol levels but significantly elevated triglyceride levels, lower HDL cholesterol levels, and smaller LDL particle size. Significant independent predictors of CVD in those with diabetes included age, albuminuria, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol (inverse), fibrinogen, and percent body fat (inverse). A 10-mg/dL increase in LDL cholesterol was associated with a 12% increase in CVD risk. Thus, even at concentrations well below the National Cholesterol Education Program target of 130 mg/dL, LDL cholesterol is a strong independent predictor of coronary heart disease in individuals with diabetes, even when components of diabetic dyslipidemia are present. These results support recent recommendations for aggressive control of LDL cholesterol in diabetic individuals, with a target level of <100 mg/dL.     

Physician attitudes and practices and patient awareness of the cardiovascular complications of diabetes

OBJECTIVES: Studies were conducted to: 1) assess physicians' attitudes and practices in managing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks in diabetes; and 2) determine the awareness of CVD risks among diabetic patients. BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of premature death among diabetic patients. As diabetes is often seen as a "glucose-centric" disease, it is unclear whether diabetic patients are talking with their doctors about CVD and other key clinical parameters of diabetes care such as blood pressure and cholesterol. METHODS: An online survey was completed by a nationally representative sample of 900 physicians. The 95% confidence interval is approximately +/-2.5%. Before this study, a telephone survey of 2,008 people with diabetes was conducted using random, direct-dial screenings of U.S. households. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of physicians believe that their patients with diabetes are "very" or "extremely" likely to have a cardiovascular event. Although physicians report discussing CVD risk factors with 88% of their diabetic patients, they perceive their diabetic patients as being only moderately knowledgeable about their increased CVD risks. Sixty-eight percent of the people with diabetes do not consider CVD to be a serious complication of diabetes; they are more likely to be aware of complications such as blindness (65%) or amputation (36%) rather than heart disease (17%), heart attack (14%), or stroke (5%). Physicians perceive "poor compliance" with behavioral modifications and medication regimens as the greatest barriers to the management of CVD risks in diabetic patients. CONCLUSION: Materials should be made available to help facilitate communication about CVD risks, and strategies for improving compliance with life-style modifications and multiple drug therapies should be explored. Efforts should continue to promote a comprehensive approach to the management of diabetes to include aggressive control of blood glucose and other CVD risk factors.