Actions of tilidine and nortilidine on cloned opioid receptors

Tilidine, alone or combined with naloxone to prevent drug abuse, is used as an oral opioid analgesic. Although the analgesic action of tilidine and its active metabolite nortilidine is reversed by naloxone and therefore believed to involve the activation of the Mu opioid (MOP, OP3, mu) receptor, this has never been studied in recombinant systems. We have measured the selectivity of tilidine and nortilidine for human opioid and opioid-like receptors stably expressed in CHO-K1 cells, using the inhibition of the forskolin (FK)-induced accumulation of cAMP as endpoint. In cells expressing the MOP receptor, tilidine and nortilidine inhibited cAMP accumulation with IC50 of 11 microM and 110 nM, respectively. The agonist effects of nortilidine and [D-Ala2-MePhe4-Gly5-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO) on the MOP receptor were reversed by naloxone with very similar IC50 (1.2 versus 1.8 nM). At concentrations up to 100 microM, tilidine and nortilidine had no agonist effect on the DOP, KOP and NOP receptors. In conclusion, this study on cloned human receptors demonstrates that nortilidine is a selective agonist of the MOP receptor.     

Sequential first-pass metabolism of nortilidine: the active metabolite of the synthetic opioid drug tilidine

The disposition of nortildine, the active metabolite of the synthetic opioid drug tilidine, was investigated in healthy volunteers in a randomized, single-dose, three-way crossover design. Three different treatments were administered: tilidine 50 mg intravenously, tilidine 50 mg orally, and nortilidine 10 mg intravenously. The plasma concentrations of tilidine, nortilidine, and bisnortilidine were determined and subjected to pharmacokinetic analysis using noncompartmental methods. The systemic bioavailability of tilidine was low (7.6% +/- 5.3%) due to a pronounced first-pass metabolism. The areas under the plasma concentration versus time curves (A UC) of nortilidine were similar following either oral or intravenous administration of tilidine 50 mg (375 +/- 184 vs. 364 +/- 124 ng.h.ml(-1)). AUC of nortilidine was 229 +/- 42 ng.h.ml(-1) after IV infusion of nortilidine 10 mg and thus much greater than after IV tilidine corrected for differences in dose. Nortilidine had a much lower volume of distribution (275 +/- 79 vs. 1326 +/- 477 L) and a somewhat lower clearance (749 +/- 119 vs. 1198 +/- 228 ml/min) than tilidine. About two-thirds of the dose of tilidine was metabolized to nortilidine, although only half of the latter fraction was available in the peripheral circulation. Nortilidine was subsequently metabolized to bisnortilidine. The mean ratio of the AUC of bisnortilidine to nortilidine was 0.65 +/- 0.14 following IV administration of nortilidine but 1.69 +/- 0.38 and 1.40 +/- 0.27 following oral and intravenous administration of tilidine, respectively. The shapes of the plasma concentration-time curves of the metabolites and parent drug declined in parallel, indicating that the disposition of the metabolites is formation rate limited. Thus, although two-thirds of the dose of tilidine is metabolized to nortilidine, only one-third of the dose is available systemically as nortilidine for interaction with the opiate receptors after both intravenous and oral dosing of tilidine. The remaining part of nortilidine is retained in the liver and is subsequently metabolized to bisnortilidine and yet unknown compounds.     

The opiate-like action of tilidine is mediated by metabolites

Summary The analgesic effect of tilidine in rats is completely antagonized by the narcotic antagonist naloxone. Radioreceptor assays revealed, however, that the main metabolites of tilidine, nortilidine and bisnortilidine, rather than tilidine exhibit affinity to opiate receptors. These findings were confirmed in studies using the electrically stimulated guinea pig ileum and the mouse vas deferens. Chronic tilidine administration to rats caused a considerable degree of physical dependence, which was expected from the ability of the intact animal to metabolize tilidine. In the isolated ileum from chronically morphinized guinea pigs, both nortilidine and bisnortilidine fully substituted for morphine in preventing induction of withdrawal, indicating dependence liability of these metabolites.     

Pharmacokinetics of nortilidine and naloxone after administration of tilidine/naloxone solution or tilidine/naloxone sustained release tablets

Valoron N is a compound which consists of the prodrug tilidine (CAS 20380-58-9), from which the active metabolite nortilidine is formed by demethylation in the liver, and the opiate antagonist naloxone (CAS 465-65-6), which prevents the abuse of the analgesic by opiate dependents. The pharmacokinetics of nortilidine and naloxone were studied in 18 male healthy subjects after oral application of tilidine/naloxone solution or tilidine/naloxone retard tablets, respectively. The following report gives the results on investigations of a) dose linearity after application of 25 mg, 50 mg and 100 mg Valoron N solution, b) dose equivalence of Valoron N solution (4 x 50 mg tilidine) and Valoron N retard tablets (2 x 100 mg tilidine) under steady state conditions, and c) the equivalence of different dose strengths of Valoron N retard tablets (50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg tilidine/tablet). The results obtained in these studies demonstrate a dose linear kinetic for nortilidine after the application of 25 mg to 100 mg tilidine. Furthermore, there is dose equivalence between the tilidine/naloxone solution and tilidine/naloxone retard tablets, which permits the replacing of the solution with the retard tablets. Because of the equivalence of different dose strengths of Valoron N tablets, patients are able to exchange low dosed Valoron N retard tablets for higher-dosed ones (50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg tilidine/tablet), if necessary. With their constant release of tilidine and the possibility for individual dosage, the retard tablets are efficient analgesics that improve pain therapy considerably for patients with chronic pain.     

Pharmacokinetics of tilidine and naloxone in patients with severe hepatic impairment

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of tilidine (CAS 20380-58-9), naloxone (CAS 465-65-6) and tilidine metabolites after administration of a single oral dose of a solution containing 100 mg tilidine hydrochloride and 8 mg naloxone hydrochloride (equivalent to 1.44 ml Valoron N solution) to patients with severe hepatic impairment. The investigation was carried out as an open single-dose study in 8 patients suffering from liver cirrhosis. Patients qualified for study enrollment if they had a Child-Pugh score of > or = 7 and a mono-ethyl-glycine-xylidide (MEGX) 15-min test value < 50 ng/ ml. Blood samples were taken over a period of 28 h and analyzed for the prodrug tilidine, its active metabolite nortilidine, bisnortilidine, and naloxone (total and non-glucuronidated fraction). Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared with data from a previous study performed in healthy volunteers. Tilidine, nortilidine and unconjugated naloxone pharmacokinetic parameters showed a high variability between patients. Compared to previous results obtained in healthy volunteers, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of nortilidine was reduced by 44%, whereas elimination half-life (t1/2) was prolonged by factor 2. The area under the curve (AUC) showed a slight reduction of approximately 20%. For total naloxone, no relevant change was observed. However, in contrast to the results obtained in healthy subjects, unconjugated naloxone could be measured in plasma from patients with cirrhosis, possibly due to a reduced glucuronidation capacity of the liver in these patients. In conclusion, severe hepatic impairment has a relatively minor influence on the exposure (AUC) to the active metabolite of tilidine (i.e., nortilidine). However, a straightforward interpretation of the results was confounded by pronounced variability in nortilidine pharmacokinetics. In individual patients with severely affected liver function, satisfactory analgesia with tilidine/naloxone oral solution might not be achieved because of insufficient formation of nortilidine and insufficient inactivation of naloxone.     

Pre‐systemic Elimination of Tilidine: Localization and Consequences for the Formation of the Active Metabolite Nortilidine

The therapeutic activity of tilidine, an opioid analgesic, is mainly related to its active metabolite nortilidine. Nortilidine formation mainly occurs during the high intestinal first‐pass metabolism of tilidine by N‐demethylation. Elimination of the active nortilidine to the inactive bisnortilidine is also mediated by N‐demethylation and is supposed to take place in the liver, probably at a smaller rate. The aim of this study was the investigation of the pre‐systemic elimination of tilidine using grapefruit juice (GFJ) as an intestinal CYP3A4 inhibitor and efavirenz (EFV) as a CYP3A4 activator. A randomized, open, placebo‐controlled, cross‐over study was conducted in 12 healthy volunteers using 100 mg tilidine solution p.o., regular strength GFJ 250 mL (3 times at 12‐hr intervals) and EFV 400 mg (12 hr before tilidine administration). Tilidine, nortilidine and bisnortilidine in plasma and urine were quantified by a validated LC/MS/MS analysis. GFJ did not change any pharmacokinetic parameter of tilidine and its metabolites, which suggests that intestinal CYP3A4 does not contribute to the first‐pass metabolism of tilidine. No effect of EFV on the pharmacokinetics of the active nortilidine was observed except a significant reduction of the terminal elimination half‐life by 15%. Overall elimination (renal and metabolic clearances) was unaffected by every treatment. CYP3A4 does not seem to play a major role in tilidine first‐pass and overall metabolism. Other unknown metabolites and their enzymes responsible for their formation have to be investigated as they account for the majority of renally excreted metabolites.     

Receptor binding, analgesic and antitussive potency of tramadol and other selected opioids

The influence of replacing the phenolic hydroxyl by the methoxy group on opioid receptor binding, analgesic and antitussive action was investigated in the corresponding couples morphine-codeine, hydromorphone-hydrocodone and O-desmethyltramadol (L 235)-tramadol. Binding was studied on rat whole brain membranes (without cerebellum) with the radioligands dihydromorphine (mu-site), ethylketocyclazocine (k-site), D-Ala2-D-Leu5-enkephalin (delta-site) and naloxone (no selective binding). Analgesia (tail flick) and antitussive action (NH3-vapour induced cough) was investigated in rats and ED50 values 10 min after i.v. application were calculated to compare efficacy. All free hydroxyl compounds had higher opioid receptor affinities than the corresponding methoxy derivatives and were more active at the mu-site. The methoxy derivatives codeine and tramadol only had low affinities lacking selectivity towards mu-, kappa-, or delta-binding. Hydrocodone in contrast showed strong and mu-selective binding. The hydroxy compounds had higher analgesic activity than the methoxy congeners and analgesia appeared to correlate with mu-binding affinity. Codeine and hydrocodone were weaker antitussives than the corresponding hydroxy compounds, whereas no significant difference was found between O-desmethyltramadol and tramadol. Only in the tramadol group the methoxy substitution increased antitussive potency in relation to analgesic potency.     

A preclinical comparison between different opioids: antinociceptive versus adverse effects

Reduced side-effect liability of opioids may enhance the patient's quality of life and decrease the incidence of opioid-insensitive pain. Literature offers few comparative data between different opioids at equianalgesic doses. Therefore morphine, fentanyl, buprenorphine, codeine, hydrocodone and oxycodone were compared for analgesic properties and side-effect profiles in rats. Analgesic efficacy was analysed using a tail withdrawal test for acute thermal nociception, a formalin test for chemically induced inflammatory pain and a von Frey test for mechanical hypersensitivity. For side-effect profiling inhibition of gastrointestinal activity was evaluated in a charcoal and ricinus oil test, arterial PCO(2) was determined for measuring respiratory depression, the discriminative stimulus properties linked to the narcotic cue were assessed using a drug discrimination learning test, and motor coordination was tested through rotarod performance. ED(50)'s for the occurrence of side-effects were compared to ED(50)'s in behavioural pain tests. Fentanyl had a strong analgesic potency and, compared to other opioids, an acceptable side-effect profiling at analgesic ED(50)'s. Also consistent was the ceiling effect of buprenorphine implying an increased safety margin for side-effects, but a decreased analgesic efficacy. Differences between opioids as observed in this study can have important indications for their use in acute as well as in the onset of chronic treatments.     

Bioavailability investigation of a new tilidine/naloxone liquid formulation compared to a reference formulation.

An oral solution available as ethanol-free droplets of the fixed drug combination tilidine-HCl 50 mg/naloxone-HCl 4 mg (CAS 27107-79-5 and CAS 465-65-6, respectively; Tilidin-ratiopharm plus Tropfen) was investigated in 12 healthy volunteers together with an ethanol-containing reference preparation for comparable bioavailability. The study was conducted in an open, randomized, two-way cross-over design applying single doses of 20 droplets (equivalent to 50 mg tilidine-HCl/4 mg naloxone-HCl) of either formulation in the fasting state. The drug plasma profiles were monitored for a period of 48 h by means of LC-MS/MS for tilidine and its active metabolite nortilidine, whereas GC-MS was employed in order to determine naloxone and its phase I metabolite, 6-beta-naloxole. Maximum concentrations (Cmax) achieved were 22.28 ng/ml (tilidine) and 92.78 ng/ml (nortilidine) for the test preparation. Corresponding values for the reference preparation were 24.95 ng/ml (tilidine) and 100.73 ng/ml (nortilidine). The extent of drug absorption (AUC0-infinity) amounted to 38.83 ng h/ml and 467.63 ng h/ml for the prodrug tilidine and the metabolite nortilidine of the test preparation and corresponded well to 43.81 ng h/ml and 493.85 ng h/ml of the reference. Regarding the rate of drug absorption, essentially identical tmax and Rabs values for both tilidine and nortilidine of either preparation in addition pointed to well comparable liquid formulations and equipotent analgesia may be inferred from opioid pharmakokinetic profiles. Pharmacokinetics of the opioid antagonist naloxone and 6-beta-naloxole were also determined and resulted in well coinciding profiles for both preparations. Thus despite the fact that only minimum oral naloxone bioavailabilities were observed, plasma level monitoring of naloxone and 6-beta-naloxole allowed for demonstration of systemic exposure of opioid antagonistic compounds throughout a period of 2-3 h after oral drug administration. Due to the limited number of subjects involved, the primary aim of the study did not consist in demonstration of drug bioequivalence. Rather a comparable bioavailability between preparations was assumed if AUC and Cmax point estimators of 90% confidence intervals would be contained within a 0.80-1.20 range. The study outcome revealed that all four investigated analytes met this requirement, whilst nortilidine pharmacokinetic parameters even fulfilled commonly accepted bioequivalence criteria, i.e. inclusion of 90% confidence intervals of AUC- and Cmax-ratios within acceptance limits of 80% and 125%. Increased data variation observed with bioavailability parameters of tilidine, naloxone and 6-beta-naloxole prevented their bioequivalence demonstration based on only 12 study participants. In conclusion, single doses of two different tilidine/naloxone 50 mg/4 mg liquid formulations revealed well comparable bioavailability for all 4 analytes investigated. Both treatments were fairly well tolerated. Most frequently reported adverse events were dizziness, headache and nausea, which all recovered without sequelae and necessity of concomitant treatment.     

The animal pharmacology of buprenorphine, an oripavine analgesic agent.

1. The general pharmacology of buprenorphine, a potent analgesic agent derived from oripavine, is described. 2. After cute administration of buprenorphine, the spontaneous locomotor activity of mice was increased; rats displayed stereotyped licking and biting movements; behavioural depression was marked in guinea-pigs but mild in rhesus monkeys. The behaviour of cats was unchanged. 3. In general, buprenorphine reduced heart rate but had no significant effect on arterial blood pressure in conscious rats and dogs. 4. In anaesthetized, open-chest cats buprenorphine (0.10 and 1.0 mg/kg, i.v.) caused no major haemodynamic changes. 5. Buprenorphine (0.01-10 mg/kg i.a.) and morphine (0.30-30 mg/kg, i.a.) increased arterial PCO2 values and reduced PO2 values in conscious rats. With doses of buprenorphine greater than 0.10 mg/kg (a) the duration of respiratory depression became less, (b) ceiling effects occurred such that the maximum effects produced were less than those obtained with morphine. 6. Buprenorphine was a potent and long-lasting antagonist of citric acid-induced coughing in guinea-pigs. 7. At a dose level 20 times greater than the ED50 for antinociception (tail pressure), morphine suppressed urine output to a greater extent than the corresponding dose of buprenorphine in rats. 8. Over the range 0.01-1.0 mg/kg (s.c.), buprenorphine slowed the passage of a charcoal meal along the gastrointestinal tract in rats. After doses in excess of 1 mg/kg, the meal travelled increasingly further such that the distances measured at 10 and 30 mg/kg did not differ significantly from control values. In contrast, the morphine dose-response relationship was linear.     

Pharmacokinetics of opioids in liver disease.

The liver is the major site of biotransformation for most opioids. Thus, the disposition of these drugs may be affected in patients with liver insufficiency. The major metabolic pathway for most opioids is oxidation. The exceptions are morphine and buprenorphine, which primarily undergo glucuronidation, and remifentanil, which is cleared by ester hydrolysis. Oxidation of opioids is reduced in patients with hepatic cirrhosis, resulting in decreased drug clearance [for pethidine (meperidine), dextropropoxyphene, pentazocine, tramadol and alfentanil] and/or increased oral bioavailability caused by a reduced first-pass metabolism (for pethidine, dextropropoxyphene, pentazocine and dihydrocodeine). Although glucuronidation is thought to be less affected in liver cirrhosis, and clearance of morphine was found to be decreased and oral bioavailability increased. The consequence of reduced drug metabolism is the risk of accumulation in the body, especially with repeated administration. Lower doses or longer administration intervals should be used to remedy this risk. Special risks are known for pethidine, with the potential for the accumulation of norpethidine, a metabolite that can cause seizures, and for dextropropoxyphene, for which several cases of hepatotoxicity have been reported. On the other hand, the analgesic activity of codeine and tilidine depends on transformation into the active metabolites, morphine and nortilidine, respectively. If metabolism is decreased in patients with chronic liver disease, the analgesic action of these drugs may be compromised. Finally, the disposition of a few opioids, such as fentanyl, sufentanil and remifentanil, appears to be unaffected in liver disease.     

The effect of narcotic analgesics on the central nervous system as an index of their drug addiction potential]

The relationship between the average effective doses causing disturbances of the statokinetic reflex and the average effective doses of the analgesic and hyperthermic actions of morphine, fentanyl, codeine and tilidine was studied in the experiments on Wistar rats. The effective analgesic and hyperthermic doses of morphine (the agent with the highest drug-addiction properties) approach the dose inducing coordination disorders. In this respect fentanyl and codeine are close to morphine. The effective doses of tilidine (the agent with the lowest drug-addiction properties among the studied agents) possess significant differences. The importance of the relationship between the mentioned effective doses and the drug-addiction properties of the analgesics.     

Determination of opioid analgesics in hair samples using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry and application to patients under palliative care

Hair testing procedures allow a cumulative reflection of long-term drug abuse and are useful as a test for compliance in clinical toxicology. In the present study, liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine analgesic opioid drugs in hair samples. The procedure used a simple methanolic extraction, and the evaporated extract was analyzed directly. A selective and sensitive procedure for the simultaneous determination of bisnortilidine, nortilidine, tilidine, buprenorphine, codeine, oxycodone, fentanyl, norfentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, normorphine, oxymorphone, methadone, piritramide, and tramadol was developed and fully validated. The method fulfilled validation criteria and was shown to be sensitive, with limits of detection ranging from 0.008 to 0.017 ng/mg hair matrix, and precision ranging between 3.1% and 14.9 %. The applicability of the method was shown by analysis of authentic hair samples from patients receiving opioids for the treatment of cancer pain (eg, fentanyl was detected in concentrations up to 0.292 ng/mg, tramadol in concentrations up to 0.612 ng/mg of hair of 1 patient). Hair analysis was shown to be a complementary and useful tool in monitoring the drug-taking behavior of patients consuming opioid analgesics for the treatment of pain. In self-reports and medical records especially, the ingestion of tramadol and methadone was found to be dramatically underreported. In summary, hair analyses gave important additional information for the medical treatment of patients, the results often coming as a surprise to even the attending physicians.     

The analgesic effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on acetylcholine-induced writhing in mice

The experimental conditions of acetylcholine (ACh)-induced writhing were investigated, and the analgesic effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on ACh-induced writhing were investigated in comparison with those on other writhings. Mice injected (i.p.) with more than 5 mg/kg of ACh showed the writhing response, and the number of writhes were almost equal in all mice. Therefore, the analgesic effects were evaluated as follows: NSAIDs were administered orally 30 min before the ACh injection (5 mg/kg, i.p.), the number of writhes were counted in each mouse during a period of 10 min following the ACh injection, and mice that did not show any writhing responses were regarded as positive for the analgesic activity. The analgesic effects of NSAIDs showing the inhibitory effect on prostaglandins (PGs) biosynthesis were more potent than those in other writhing tests. The ED50 values in the ACh-induced writhing were highly correlated with the IC50 values in the inhibitory effects on PGs biosynthesis (r = 0.81, P less than 0.01) and with the ED50 values in the anti-castor oil diarrhoea (r = 0.93, P less than 0.01). Moreover, the ED50 values of acidic NSAIDs in ACh-induced writhing were also highly correlated with the clinical doses (r = 0.90, P less than 0.001). These results suggest that the ACh-induced writhing method should be useful for the evaluation of the analgesic effects of acidic NSAIDs, and the analgesic effects on the ACh-induced writhing are related to their inhibitory effects on PGs biosynthesis.     

Comparison of tilidine/naloxone, tramadol and bromfenac in experimental pain: a double-blind randomized crossover study in healthy human volunteers.

AIM: The analgesic efficacy and safety of single oral doses of two centrally acting compounds, the combination of 50 mg tilidine and 4 mg naloxone (Valoron N) and 50 mg tramadol (Tramal), were compared to 25, 50 and 75 mg of the non-steroidal antiinflammatory bromfenac in experimental pain. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: It was a placebo-controlled double-blind 6-way crossover study design with 12 human volunteers. Acute pain was generated by electrical tooth pulp stimulation. Treatment effects were determined by recording somatosensory-evoked potentials and by subjective pain rating. RESULTS: The tilidine/naloxone combination clearly was the most potent medication in this study, followed by bromfenac 75 mg, which produced an early pain relief. Tramadol produced poor analgesia, as did bromfenac 25 and 50 mg. There was no dose-response relationship for bromfenac. Control of plasma levels revealed pronounced interindividual differences in peak plasma concentrations for bromfenac, but not for tramadol. Tilidine/naloxone exerted adverse effects in 9, tramadol in 3 volunteers. Under medication with 25 and 50 mg bromfenac, respectively, only one subject reported adverse effects. No adverse effects were experienced with 75 mg bromfenac or placebo. CONCLUSION: The results support previous conclusions about the analgesic efficacy of tilidine/naloxone and tramadol in experimental pain. Moreover, the findings suggest that 75 mg bromfenac might be suitable for fast but short relief of pain of non-inflammatory genesis.     

In vitro metabolism of the opioid tilidine and interaction of tilidine and nortilidine with CYP3A4, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6

Tilidine is one of the most widely used narcotics in Germany and Belgium. The compound's active metabolite nortilidine easily penetrates the blood-brain barrier and activates the mu-opioid receptor. Thus far, the enzymes involved in tilidine metabolism are unknown. Therefore, the aim of our study was to identify the cytochrome P450 isozymes (CYPs) involved in N-demethylation of tilidine in vitro. We used human liver microsomes as well as recombinant CYPs to investigate the demethylation of tilidine to nortilidine and quantified nortilidine by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Inhibition of CYPs was quantified with commercial kits. Moreover, inhibition of ABCB1 and ABCG2 was investigated. Our results demonstrated that N-demethylation of tilidine to nortilidine followed a Michaelis-Menten kinetic with a K (m) value of 36 +/- 13 muM and a v (max) value of 85 +/- 18 nmol/mg/h. This metabolic step was inhibited by CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 inhibitors. Investigations with recombinant CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 confirmed that the demethylation of tilidine occurs via these two CYPs. Inhibition assays demonstrated that tilidine and nortilidine can also inhibit CYP3A4, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, ABCB1, but not ABCG2, whereas inhibition of CYP2D6 and possibly also of CYP3A4 might be clinically relevant. By calculating the metabolic clearance based on the in vitro and published in vivo data, CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 were identified as the main elimination routes of tilidine. In vivo, drug-drug interactions of tilidine with CYP3A4 or CYP2C19 inhibitors are to be anticipated, whereas substrates of CYP2C19, ABCB1, or ABCG2 will presumably not be influenced by tilidine or nortilidine.     

Broad analgesic profile of buprenorphine in rodent models of acute and chronic pain

Buprenorphine is a potent opioid analgesic clinically used to treat moderate to severe pain. The present study assessed its analgesic efficacy in a broad range of rodent models of acute and chronic pain. In the phenylquinone writhing, hot plate, and tail flick mouse models of acute pain, full analgesic efficacy was obtained (ED50 values: 0.0084-0.16 mg/kg i.v.). Full analgesic efficacy was also obtained in yeast- and formalin-induced inflammatory pain (ED50 values: 0.0024-0.025 mg/kg i.v., rats and mice) and in mustard-oil-induced spontaneous pain, referred allodynia, and referred hyperalgesia in mice (ED50 values: 0.018-0.025 mg/kg i.v.). Buprenorphine strongly inhibited mechanical and cold allodynia in mononeuropathic rats, as well as mechanical hyperalgesia and cold allodynia in polyneuropathic rats (ED50 values: 0.055 and 0.036 mg/kg i.v. and 0.129 and 0.038 mg/kg i.p., respectively). It is concluded that buprenorphine shows a broad analgesic profile and offers the opportunity to treat different pain conditions, including neuropathic pain.     

Uniform assessment and ranking of opioid μ receptor binding constants for selected opioid drugs

The safe disposal of unused opioid drugs is an area of regulatory concern. While toilet flushing is recommended for some drugs to prevent accidental exposure, there is a need for data that can support a more consistent disposal policy based on an assessment of relative risk. For drugs acting at the Mu-opioid receptor (MOR), published measurements of binding affinity (K(i)) are incomplete and inconsistent due to differences in methodology and assay system, leading to a wide range of values for the same drug thus precluding a simple and meaningful relative ranking of drug potency. Experiments were conducted to obtain K(i)'s for 19 approved opioid drugs using a single binding assay in a cell membrane preparation expressing recombinant human MOR. The K(i) values obtained ranged from 0.1380 nM (sufentanil) to 12.486 μM (tramadol). The drugs were separated into three categories based upon their K(i) values: K(i) > 100 nM (tramadol, codeine, meperidine, propoxyphene and pentazocine), K(i)=1-100 nM (hydrocodone, oxycodone, diphenoxylate, alfentanil, methadone, nalbuphine, fentanyl and morphine) and K(i) < 1 nM (butorphanol, levorphanol, oxymorphone, hydromorphone, buprenorphine and sufentanil). These data add to the understanding of the pharmacology of opioid drugs and support the development of a more consistent labeling policies regarding safe disposal.     

Acetylcodeine, an impurity of illicitly manufactured heroin, elicits convulsions, antinociception, and locomotor stimulation in mice.

Acetylcodeine is one of the major impurities present in illicitly manufactured heroin (diacetylmorphine). Data on its pharmacology and toxicology are limited and its ability to alter the toxic effects of diacetylmorphine is not known. The first objective of the present study was to compare the acute pharmacological and toxicological effects of acetylcodeine to those of codeine and diacetylmorphine in mice by assessing nociception in the tail-flick test, locomotor stimulation, and convulsive behavior. The second goal of this study was to determine whether acetylcodeine would alter the convulsant effects of diacetylmorphine. The antinociceptive potencies of acetylcodeine and codeine were similar, as reflected by their ED50 (95% confidence limits) values of 35 (29-44) and 51 (40-65) micromol/kg, respectively. Acetylcodeine was somewhat less potent than codeine in stimulating locomotor behavior, with ED50 values of 28 (22-37) and 12 (6-24) micromol/kg, respectively. Diacetylmorphine was considerably more potent than the other two drugs, producing antinociception and locomotor stimulation at ED50 values of 2.4 (1.4-4.1) and 0.65 (0.36-1.2) micromol/kg, respectively. On the other hand, the convulsant effects of acetylcodeine (ED50=138 (121-157) micromol/kg) and diacetylmorphine (ED50=115 (81-163) micromol/kg) were similar in potency and both were more potent than codeine (ED50=231 (188-283) micromol/kg). Finally, a subthreshold dose of acetylcodeine (72 micromol/kg) decreased the convulsant ED50 dose of diacetylmorphine to 40 (32-49). These findings suggest that the convulsant effects of acetylcodeine are more potent than predicted by its effects on locomotor activity and antinociception. The observation that acetylcodeine potentiated the convulsant effects of diacetylmorphine suggests a mechanism for some of the heroin-related deaths reported in human addicts.     

Buprenorphine 5, 10 and 20 μg/h transdermal patch: a guide to its use in chronic non-malignant pain

Buprenorphine lower-dose (5, 10 and 20?μg/h) transdermal patches, which are administered once every 7 days, are indicated in the management of chronic non-malignant pain. This review focuses on the labelling of this formulation (BuTrans?) in the EU. The analgesic efficacy of transdermal buprenorphine in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee has been demonstrated to be equivalent to sublingual buprenorphine, noninferior to prolonged-release tramadol and generally superior to a matching transdermal placebo patch. When used together with regularly scheduled oral paracetamol (acetaminophen), transdermal buprenorphine was noninferior to codeine plus paracetamol. Transdermal buprenorphine has also shown analgesic efficacy in patients with chronic non-malignant pain of various causes.