Nitrobenzylthioinosine (NBMPR) binding and nucleoside transporter ENT1 mRNA expression after prolonged wakefulness and recovery sleep in the cortex and basal forebrain of rat

We have previously shown that extracellular adenosine levels increase locally in the basal forebrain (BF) during prolonged wakefulness, yet the cellular mechanisms of this local accumulation have remained unknown. The extracellular adenosine levels are strictly regulated by adenosine metabolism and its transport through cell membrane by the nucleoside transporters. As we previously showed that the key adenosine metabolizing enzymes were not affected by prolonged wakefulness, we now focussed on potential changes in the nucleoside transporters. In the present study, we measured the binding of nitrobenzylthioinosine (NBMPR), an ENT1 transporter inhibitor, and the ENT1 transporter mRNA after prolonged wakefulness and recovery sleep. Rats were sleep-deprived for 3 or 6 h using gentle handling. After 6 h one group was allowed to sleep for 2 h. NBMPR binding was determined from BF and cortex by incubating tissue extracts with [3H] NBMPR. The in situ hybridization was carried out on 20 microm cryosections using [35S]dATP-labelled oligonucleotide probe for ENT1 mRNA. The NBMPR binding was significantly decreased in the BF, but not in the cortex, after 6 h sleep deprivation when compared with the time-matched controls, suggesting a decline in adenosine transport. The expression of ENT1 mRNA did not change during prolonged wakefulness or recovery sleep in either cortex or the BF, although circadian variations were measured in both areas. We conclude that the regional decrease in adenosine transport could contribute to the gradual accumulation of extracellular adenosine in the basal forebrain during prolonged wakefulness.     

Differential increase in the expression of heat shock protein family members during sleep deprivation and during sleep

Although sleep is thought to be restorative from prior wakeful activities, it is not clear what is being restored. To determine whether the synthesis of macromolecules is increased in the cerebral cortex during sleep, we subjected C57BL/6 mice to 6 hours of sleep deprivation and then screened the expression of 1176 genes of known function by using cDNA arrays. The expression of the heat shock proteins (HSP), endoplasmic reticulum protein (ERp72) and glucose-regulated protein (GRp78), was among the genes whose expression was significantly elevated in the cortex during sleep deprivation, whereas GRp78 and GRp94 mRNAs were elevated in the cortex during recovery sleep after sleep deprivation, as confirmed by conventional and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and/or Northern analyses. A systematic evaluation of the expression of six heat shock protein family members (ERP72, GRp78, GRp94, HSP27, HSP70-1, and HSP84) in seven brain regions revealed increased mRNA levels in cortex, basal forebrain, hypothalamus, cerebellum and medulla during sleep deprivation, whereas increased mRNA levels during recovery sleep were limited to the cortex and medulla. Immunohistochemical studies identified increased numbers of GRp78-, GRp94-, and ERp72-immunoreactive cells in the dorsal and lateral cortex during sleep deprivation but, during recovery sleep, elevated numbers of these cells were found only in the lateral cortex. In the medulla, increased numbers of GRp94-immunoreactive cells were observed in nucleus tractus solitarius, dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus and the rostroventrolateral medulla during recovery sleep. The widespread increase of heat shock protein family mRNAs in brain during sleep deprivation may be a neuroprotective response to prolonged wakefulness. In contrast, the relatively limited heat shock protein family mRNA expression during recovery sleep may be related to the role of heat shock proteins in protein biogenesis and thus to the restorative function of sleep.     

Adenosinergic inhibition of basal forebrain wakefulness-active neurons: a simultaneous unit recording and microdialysis study in freely behaving cats

The majority of neurons in the magnocellular basal forebrain are wakefulness-active with highest discharge activity during wakefulness and a marked reduction in activity just before and during the entry to non-rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. We have hypothesized that the reduction of discharge activity of wakefulness-active neurons and a consequent facilitation of the transition from wakefulness to sleep is due to an increase in the extracellular concentration of adenosine during wakefulness. To test the hypothesis, the present study employed microdialysis perfusion of adenosinergic pharmacological agents combined with single unit recording in freely moving cats, so as to determine: 1). if there were dose-dependent effects on behaviorally identified wakefulness-active neurons; 2). whether effects were mediated by the A1 receptor, as contrasted to the A2a receptor; and 3). if effects were specific to wakefulness-active neurons, and not present in sleep-active neurons, those preferentially discharging in nonREM sleep.Both adenosine and the A1 receptor-specific agonist N6-cyclo-hexyl-adenosine reduced the discharge activity of wakefulness-active neurons (n=16) in a dose-dependent manner but had no effect on sleep-active neurons (n=4). The A1 receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1-3-dimethylxanthine increased the discharge of wakefulness-active neurons (n=5), but the A2a receptor agonist, CGS-16284, had no effect (n=3). Recording sites were histologically localized to the cholinergic basal forebrain. These data support our hypothesis that adenosine acts via the A1 receptor to reduce the activity of wakefulness-promoting neurons, thus providing a cellular mechanism explaining why the increased adenosine concentrations observed in the basal forebrain following prolonged wakefulness act to induce sleep.     

Gene expression in the rat brain during sleep deprivation and recovery sleep: an Affymetrix GeneChip study

Previous studies have demonstrated that macromolecular synthesis in the brain is modulated in association with the occurrence of sleep and wakefulness. Similarly, the spectral composition of electroencephalographic activity that occurs during sleep is dependent on the duration of prior wakefulness. Since this homeostatic relationship between wake and sleep is highly conserved across mammalian species, genes that are truly involved in the electroencephalographic response to sleep deprivation might be expected to be conserved across mammalian species. Therefore, in the rat cerebral cortex, we have studied the effects of sleep deprivation on the expression of immediate early gene and heat shock protein mRNAs previously shown to be upregulated in the mouse brain in sleep deprivation and in recovery sleep after sleep deprivation. We find that the molecular response to sleep deprivation and recovery sleep in the brain is highly conserved between these two mammalian species, at least in terms of expression of immediate early gene and heat shock protein family members. Using Affymetrix Neurobiology U34 GeneChips , we also screened the rat cerebral cortex, basal forebrain, and hypothalamus for other genes whose expression may be modulated by sleep deprivation or recovery sleep. We find that the response of the basal forebrain to sleep deprivation is more similar to that of the cerebral cortex than to the hypothalamus. Together, these results suggest that sleep-dependent changes in gene expression in the cerebral cortex are similar across rodent species and therefore may underlie sleep history-dependent changes in sleep electroencephalographic activity.     

Extracellular adenosine in the human brain during sleep and sleep deprivation: an in vivo microdialysis study

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine the pattern of extracellular adenosine in the human brain during sleep deprivation, sleep, and normal wake. DESIGN: Following recovery from implantation of clinical depth electrodes, epilepsy patients remained awake for 40 continuous hours, followed by a recovery sleep episode. SETTING: Neurology ward at UCLA Medical Center. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Seven male epilepsy patients undergoing depth electrode localization of pharmacologically refractory seizures. INTERVENTIONS: All subjects were implanted with depth electrodes, a subset of which were customized to contain microdialysis probes. Microdialysis samples were collected during normal sleep, sleep deprivation, and recovery sleep from human amygdalae (n = 8), hippocampus (n = 1), and cortex (n = 1). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: In none of the probes did we observe an increase in extracellular adenosine during the sleep deprivation. There was a significant, though very small, diurnal oscillation (2.5%) in 5 of the 8 amygdalae. There was no effect of epileptogenicity on the pattern of extracellular adenosine. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations, along with those in animal studies, indicate that the role of extracellular adenosine in regulating sleep pressure is not a global brain phenomenon but is likely limited to specific basal forebrain areas. Thus, if energy homeostasis is a function of sleep, an increased rate of adenosine release into the extracellular milieu of the amygdala, cortex, or hippocampus is unlikely to be a marker of such a process.     

Extracellular histamine levels in the feline preoptic/anterior hypothalamic area during natural sleep-wakefulness and prolonged wakefulness: an in vivo microdialysis study

Increased activity of the histaminergic neurons of the posterior hypothalamus has been implicated in the facilitation of behavioral wakefulness. Recent evidence of reciprocal projections between the sleep-active neurons of the preoptic/anterior hypothalamus and the histaminergic neurons of the tuberomammillary nucleus suggests that histaminergic innervation of the preoptic/anterior hypothalamic area may be of particular importance in the wakefulness-promoting properties of histamine. To test this possibility, we used microdialysis sample collection in the preoptic/anterior hypothalamic area of cats during natural sleep-wakefulness cycles, 6 h of sleep deprivation induced by gentle handling/playing, and recovery sleep. Samples were analyzed by a sensitive radioenzymatic assay. Mean basal levels of histamine in microdialysate during periods of wakefulness (1.155+/-0.225 pg/microl) did not vary during the 6 h of sleep deprivation. However, during the different sleep states, dramatic changes were observed in the extracellular histamine levels of preoptic/anterior hypothalamic area: wakefulness>non-rapid eye movement sleep>rapid eye movement sleep. Levels of histamine during rapid eye movement sleep were lowest (0.245+/-0.032 pg/microl), being significantly lower than levels during non-rapid eye movement sleep (0.395+/-0.081 pg/microl) and being only 21% of wakefulness levels.This pattern of preoptic/anterior hypothalamic area extracellular histamine levels across the sleep-wakefulness cycle closely resembles the reported single unit activity of histaminergic neurons. However, the invariance of histamine levels during sleep deprivation suggests that changes in histamine level do not relay information about sleep drive to the sleep-promoting neurons of the preoptic/anterior hypothalamic area.     

The disconnected brain stem does not support rapid eye movement sleep rebound following selective deprivation

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the brain stem can independently support the processes of rapid eye movement sleep rebound and pressure that follow deprivation. DESIGN: Cats with a brain-stem separation from the forebrain were compared to intact subjects on their response to rapid eye movement sleep deprivation. PARTICIPANTS: Eight adult mongrel cats of both sexes. INTERVENTIONS: All cats had electrodes implanted for polygraphic recordings, and 4 subjects sustained a mesencephalic transection. Weeks later, a 24-hour undisturbed sleep-wakefulness recording session was performed, and the next day, a similar session started with a 6-hour deprivation period, which was followed by 18 hours of undisturbed sleep. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Deprivation produced 90.1% and 87.8 % losses of rapid eye movement sleep time in intact and decerebrate cats, respectively. However, no significant changes in non-rapid eye movement sleep, drowsiness, or waking time percentages were seen in either group of animals when comparing the 6-hour time blocks of the deprivation and baseline sessions, indicating selective rapid eye movement sleep deprivation. During the 6-hour block following deprivation, rapid eye movement sleep time increased a significant 34.6% in intact cats while, in contrast, there was no rapid eye movement sleep rebound in decerebrate animals. The number of aborted episodes of rapid eye movement sleep during deprivation exceeded the number of episodes during the same period of the baseline day by 3 and 5 folds in intact and decerebrate cats, respectively, indicating an increase in rapid eye movement sleep pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Rebound in rapid eye movement sleep after deprivation cannot be sustained by the brain stem alone; in contrast, rapid eye movement sleep pressure persisted in the decerebrate cat, demonstrating that this process does not depend on descending forebrain influences. This indicates that rebound and pressure are 2 different components of the recovery process after rapid eye movement sleep deprivation and that, as such, are likely controlled by different mechanisms.     

Control of sleep and wakefulness

This review summarizes the brain mechanisms controlling sleep and wakefulness. Wakefulness promoting systems cause low-voltage, fast activity in the electroencephalogram (EEG). Multiple interacting neurotransmitter systems in the brain stem, hypothalamus, and basal forebrain converge onto common effector systems in the thalamus and cortex. Sleep results from the inhibition of wake-promoting systems by homeostatic sleep factors such as adenosine and nitric oxide and GABAergic neurons in the preoptic area of the hypothalamus, resulting in large-amplitude, slow EEG oscillations. Local, activity-dependent factors modulate the amplitude and frequency of cortical slow oscillations. Non-rapid-eye-movement (NREM) sleep results in conservation of brain energy and facilitates memory consolidation through the modulation of synaptic weights. Rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep results from the interaction of brain stem cholinergic, aminergic, and GABAergic neurons which control the activity of glutamatergic reticular formation neurons leading to REM sleep phenomena such as muscle atonia, REMs, dreaming, and cortical activation. Strong activation of limbic regions during REM sleep suggests a role in regulation of emotion. Genetic studies suggest that brain mechanisms controlling waking and NREM sleep are strongly conserved throughout evolution, underscoring their enormous importance for brain function. Sleep disruption interferes with the normal restorative functions of NREM and REM sleep, resulting in disruptions of breathing and cardiovascular function, changes in emotional reactivity, and cognitive impairments in attention, memory, and decision making.     

A quartet neural system model orchestrating sleep and wakefulness mechanisms

Physiological knowledge of the neural mechanisms regulating sleep and wakefulness has been advanced by the recent findings concerning sleep/wakefulness-related preoptic/anterior hypothalamic and perifornical (orexin-containing)/posterior hypothalamic neurons. In this paper, we propose a mathematical model of the mechanisms orchestrating a quartet neural system of sleep and wakefulness composed of the following: 1) sleep-active preoptic/anterior hypothalamic neurons (N-R group); 2) wake-active hypothalamic and brain stem neurons exhibiting the highest rate of discharge during wakefulness and the lowest rate of discharge during paradoxical or rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (WA group); 3) brain stem neurons exhibiting the highest rate of discharge during REM sleep (REM group); and 4) basal forebrain, hypothalamic, and brain stem neurons exhibiting a higher rate of discharge during both wakefulness and REM sleep than during nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep (W-R group). The WA neurons have mutual inhibitory couplings with the REM and N-R neurons. The W-R neurons have mutual excitatory couplings with the WA and REM neurons. The REM neurons receive unidirectional inhibition from the N-R neurons. In addition, the N-R neurons are activated by two types of sleep-promoting substances (SPS), which play different roles in the homeostatic regulation of sleep and wakefulness. The model well reproduces the actual sleep and wakefulness patterns of rats in addition to the sleep-related neuronal activities across state transitions. In addition, human sleep-wakefulness rhythms can be simulated by manipulating only a few model parameters: inhibitions from the N-R neurons to the REM and WA neurons are enhanced, and circadian regulation of the N-R and WA neurons is exaggerated. Our model could provide a novel framework for the quantitative understanding of the mechanisms regulating sleep and wakefulness.     

Sleep fragmentation elevates behavioral, electrographic and neurochemical measures of sleepiness

Sleep fragmentation, a feature of sleep apnea as well as other sleep and medical/psychiatric disorders, is thought to lead to excessive daytime sleepiness. A rodent model of sleep fragmentation was developed (termed sleep interruption, SI), where rats were awakened every 2 min by the movement of an automated treadmill for either 6 or 24 h of exposure. The sleep pattern of rats exposed to 24 h of SI resembled sleep of the apneic patient in the following ways: sleep was fragmented (up to 30 awakening/h), total rapid eye movement (REM) sleep time was greatly reduced, non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep episode duration was reduced (from 2 min, 5 s baseline to 58 s during SI), whereas the total amount of NREM sleep time per 24 h approached basal levels. Both 6 and 24 h of SI made rats more sleepy, as indicated by a reduced latency to fall asleep upon SI termination. Electrographic measures in the recovery sleep period following either 6 or 24 h of SI also indicated an elevation of homeostatic sleep drive; specifically, the average NREM episode duration increased (e.g. for 24 h SI, from 2 min, 5 s baseline to 3 min, 19 s following SI), as did the NREM delta power during recovery sleep. Basal forebrain (BF) levels of extracellular adenosine (AD) were also measured with microdialysis sample collection and high performance liquid chromatography detection, as previous work suggests that increasing concentrations of BF AD are related to sleepiness. BF AD levels were significantly elevated during SI, peaking at 220% of baseline during 30 h of SI exposure. These combined findings imply an elevation of the homeostatic sleep drive following either 6 or 24 h of SI, and BF AD levels appear to correlate more with sleepiness than with the cumulative amount of prior wakefulness, since total NREM sleep time declined only slightly. SI may be partially responsible for the symptom of daytime sleepiness observed in a number of clinical disorders, and this may be mediated by mechanisms involving BF AD.     

Sleep and its homeostatic regulation in mice lacking the adenosine A1 receptor

Sleep deprivation (SD) increases extracellular adenosine levels in the basal forebrain, and pharmacological manipulations that increase extracellular adenosine in the same area promote sleep. As pharmacological evidence indicates that the effect is mediated through adenosine A1 receptors (A1R), we expected A1R knockout (KO) mice to have reduced rebound sleep after SD. Male homozygous A1R KO mice, wild-type (WT) mice, and heterozygotes (HET) from a mixed 129/C57BL background were implanted during anesthesia with electrodes for electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG). After 1 week of recovery, they were allowed to adapt to recording leads for 2 weeks. EEG and EMG were recorded continuously. All genotypes had a pronounced diurnal sleep/wake rhythm after 2 weeks of adaptation. We then analyzed 24 h of baseline recording, 6 h of SD starting at light onset, and 42 h of recovery recording. Neither rapid eye movement sleep (REM sleep) nor non-REM sleep (NREMS) amounts differed significantly between the groups. SD for 6 h induced a strong NREMS rebound in all three groups. NREMS time and accumulated EEG delta power were equal in WT, HET and KO. Systemic administration of the selective A1R antagonist 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (8-CPT) inhibited sleep for 30 min in WT, whereas saline and 8-CPT both inhibited sleep in KO. We conclude that constitutional lack of adenosine A1R does not prevent the homeostatic regulation of sleep.     

The suprachiasmatic nucleus regulates sleep timing and amount in mice

CONTEXT: Sleep is regulated by circadian and homeostatic processes. The circadian pacemaker, located in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), regulates the timing and consolidation of the sleep-wake cycle, while a homeostatic mechanism governs the accumulation of sleep debt and sleep recovery. Recent studies using mice with deletions or mutations of circadian genes show that components of the circadian pacemaker can influence the total amount of baseline sleep and recovery from sleep deprivation, indicating a broader role for the SCN in sleep regulation. OBJECTIVE: To further investigate the role of the circadian pacemaker in sleep regulation in mice, we recorded sleep in sham and SCN-lesioned mice under baseline conditions and following sleep deprivation. RESULTS: Compared to sham controls, SCN-lesioned mice exhibited a decrease in sleep consolidation and a decrease in wakefulness during the dark phase. Following sleep deprivation, SCN-lesioned mice exhibited an attenuated increase in non-rapid eye movement sleep time but an increase in non-rapid eye movement sleep electroencephalographic delta power that was similar to that of the sham controls. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the hypothesis that the SCN consolidate the sleep-wake cycle by generating a signal of arousal during the subjective night (ie. the active period), thereby having the capacity to alter baseline sleep amount. Although the SCN are not involved in sleep homeostasis as defined by the increase in electroencephalographic delta power after sleep deprivation, the SCN does play a central role in the regulation of sleep and wakefulness beyond just the timing of vigilance states.     

The effect of sleep deprivation on cerebral glucose metabolic rate in normal humans assessed with positron emission tomography.

This study is the first report on the effects of total sleep deprivation (about 32 h) on regional cerebral glucose metabolism during wakefulness in man, using positron emission tomography (PET) with F-18 deoxyglucose (FDG). Sleep deprivation leads to a significant reorganization of regional cerebral metabolic activity, with relative decreases in the temporal lobes and increases in visual cortex. Absolute glucose metabolic measurements indicate a decrease in thalamus, basal ganglia, white matter, and cerebellum. No overall decrease in whole brain metabolism was noted after sleep deprivation. As expected, sleep deprivation significantly reduced visual vigilance as assessed by the continuous performance test and this decrease was correlated significantly with reduced metabolic rate in thalamic, basal ganglia, and limbic regions.     

Immediate-early genes in spontaneous wakefulness and sleep: expression of c-fos and NGFI-A mRNA and protein

SUMMARY  We have recently shown that the expression of two immediate-early genes, c-fos and NGFI-A, is strongly affected by sleep deprivation. In this work, we investigated c-fos and NGFI-A expression after periods of spontaneous wakefulness or sleep. We used in situ hybridization and immunocytochemistry to detect the corresponding mRNA and protein levels, respectively. A first group of rats (S-L) was sacrificed during the light hours at the end of a long period of sleep. A second group (W-L) was sacrificed under similar conditions, except that during the last half hour the animals had been spontaneously awake. A third group (W-D) was sacrificed during the dark hours after a long period of continuous wakefulness. We found that c-fos and NGFI-A expression in several brain areas was increased in W-L and W-D rats with respect to S-L rats. Some of these areas, including the cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, and colliculi, may have been activated by the increased sensory and motor activity associated with waking. The activation of other areas, such as the medial preoptic area of the hypothalamus and some brainstem nuclei, may be more directly related to sleep regulation. These results indicate that many regions showing an increased expression of immediate early genes after wakefulness induced by sleep deprivation are also activated by periods of spontaneous wakefulness.     

Adenosine inhibits glutamatergic input to basal forebrain cholinergic neurons

Adenosine has been proposed as an endogenous homeostatic sleep factor that accumulates during waking and inhibits wake-active neurons to promote sleep. It has been specifically hypothesized that adenosine decreases wakefulness and promotes sleep recovery by directly inhibiting wake-active neurons of the basal forebrain (BF), particularly BF cholinergic neurons. We previously showed that adenosine directly inhibits BF cholinergic neurons. Here, we investigated 1) how adenosine modulates glutamatergic input to BF cholinergic neurons and 2) how adenosine uptake and adenosine metabolism are involved in regulating extracellular levels of adenosine. Our experiments were conducted using whole cell patch-clamp recordings in mouse brain slices. We found that in BF cholinergic neurons, adenosine reduced the amplitude of AMPA-mediated evoked glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) and decreased the frequency of spontaneous and miniature EPSCs through presynaptic A(1) receptors. Thus we have demonstrated that in addition to directly inhibiting BF cholinergic neurons, adenosine depresses excitatory inputs to these neurons. It is therefore possible that both direct and indirect inhibition may synergistically contribute to the sleep-promoting effects of adenosine in the BF. We also found that blocking the influx of adenosine through the equilibrative nucleoside transporters or inhibiting adenosine kinase and adenosine deaminase increased endogenous adenosine inhibitory tone, suggesting a possible mechanism through which adenosine extracellular levels in the basal forebrain are regulated.