Adenosine receptor agonists or antagonists alter antinociception, but did not show an interaction with imipramine-induced antinociception in the formalin test in mice.

In this study, the antinociceptive effect of imipramine and adenosine agents, and interactions between imipramine with adenosine drugs in mice in the formalin test, have been investigated. Intraperitoneal administration of different doses of imipramine (10, 20, 30 and 40 mg/kg) induced a dose dependent antinociception in mice, in both the first and second phases of the formalin test. The adenosine A(1) receptor agonists, R-(N(6)-phenylisopropyl)-adenosine (0.015, 0.03 and 0.1 mg/kg) and 5'-N-ethylcarboxamide adenosine (0.001, 0.005, 0.01 mg/kg), but not 2-chloroadenosine (0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg), and the adenosine receptor antagonist, 8-phenyltheophylline (0.1, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg), but not 1,3-dipropyl-7-methyl-xanthine (0.5 and 5 mg/kg), also produced an antinociceptive response. Lower dose of the adenosine receptor antagonist theophylline induced antinociception, while a higher dose of the drug caused hyperalgesia. Theophylline reduced the response induced by imipramine. It is concluded that adenosine systems are not involved in imipramine responses in the formalin test.     

Effects of dopaminergic agents on antinociception in formalin test.

Morphine caused a dose-related antinociception in early phase and late phase of formalin test in mice. The D2 dopamine agonist quinpirole, but not the D1 dopamine agonist SKF 38393, increased the antinociceptive effect of morphine in both phases of the test. The antinociceptive effect of quinpirole also was decreased by sulpiride or domperidone pretreatment in the early phase of test. The D1 antagonist SCH23390, the D2 antagonist sulpiride, or the peripheral D2 dopamine antagonist domperidone, increased the morphine effect. Single administration of SKF38393, quinpirole, SCH23390, sulpiride, and domperidone also induce antinociception. The response of SCH23390, but not that of other dopamine agents, was antagonized with naloxone. The effects of the drugs alone and in combination with morphine have been discussed.     

Sildenafil produces antinociception and increases morphine antinociception in the formalin test

The antinociceptive activity of an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 5 alone or combined with morphine was assessed in the formalin test. Local administration of 1-[4-ethoxy-3-(6, 7-dihydro-1-methyl-7-oxo-3-propyl-1H-pyrazolo [3, 4-d]pyrimidin-5-yl)phenylsulfonyl]-4-methyl piperazine (sildenafil, inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 5) produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in the second phase of the formalin test in female Wistar rats. In contrast, morphine produced antinociception in both phases. Sildenafil significantly increased the morphine-induced antinociception. The antinociception produced by the drugs alone or combined was due to a local action, as its administration in the contralateral paw was ineffective. Pretreatment of the paws with N(G)-L-nitro-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, nitric oxide (NO) synthesis inhibitor), 1H-[1,2, 4]-oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ, guanylyl cyclase inhibitor) or naloxone blocked the effect of the combination. Results suggest that opioid receptors, NO and cyclic GMP are relevant in the combination-induced antinociception. In conclusion, sildenafil produced antinociception and increased that produced by morphine, probably through the inhibition of cyclic GMP degradation.     

Sildenafil increases diclofenac antinociception in the formalin test

The antinociceptive activity of an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 5, alone or combined with diclofenac, was assessed in the formalin test. Local administration of diclofenac produced a significant antinociception in both phases of the formalin test in female Wistar rats. In contrast, 1-[4-ethoxy-3-(6,7-dihydro-1-methyl-7-oxo-3-propyl-1H-pyrazolo [3,4-d]pyrimidin-5-yl)phenylsulfonyl]-4-methyl piperazine (sildenafil, an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 5) produced significant antinociception, only during the second phase of the formalin test. Non-effective doses of sildenafil (25-100 microg/paw) significantly increased the antinociceptive effect of an inactive dose of diclofenac (25 microg) in both phases of the test. The antinociception produced by the drugs alone or the combination was due to a local action, as its administration in the contralateral paw was ineffective. Since sildenafil is a potent and selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 5, our results suggest that this drug produced its antinociceptive activity, and increased that of diclofenac, probably through the inhibition of cyclic GMP degradation.     

Potentiation of imipramine-induced antinociception by nicotine in the formalin test.

In this study, the effect of cholinergic agents on imipramine antinociception in mice, in the formalin test, has been investigated. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of different doses of imipramine (2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 30 mg/kg) or nicotine (0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1 mg/kg) induced a dose dependent antinociception in both the first and second phases of the formalin test in mice. The combination of imipramine with doses of 0.5 and 0.75 mg/kg of nicotine showed a potentiated response, in both phases of the test. However, neither hexamethonium (5 and 10 mg/kg), atropine (0.25 mg/kg) or mecamylamine (0.25 mg/kg) altered the antinociception induced by imipramine. It is concluded that nicotinic receptor activation but not the cholinergic muscarinic mechanism is involved in the imipramine-induced antinociception.     

Saccharin effects on morphine-induced antinociception in the mouse formalin test.

This study was performed to investigate the role of sweetness and taste sensations of the non-caloric sweetener saccharin on pain and morphine antinociception by the formalin test in mice. The formalin test was chosen because it measures the response to a long-lasting nociceptive stimulus and thus may closely resemble clinical pain. The total time (seconds) spent licking and biting the injected paw (indices of nociception) during periods of 0-5 min (early phase) and 10-30 min (late phase) were measured as an indicator of pain and inflammatory responses. A 12 days pretreatment of animals with saccharin (0.04%, 0.08%, 0.16%) produced complex effects on the action of morphine. All doses significantly potentiated the low dose (1.5 mgkg(-1)) of morphine-induced analgesia in the early phase significantly but antagonized the effect of morphine (3 mgkg(-1)). The effect of high doses of morphine (6-9 mgkg(-1)) was antagonized by the low dose of saccharin (0.04%), but the effect of morphine (6 mgkg(-1)) was potentiated with high concentrations of saccharin (0.08% and 0.16%). All doses of saccharin decreased the analgesic effect of morphine at a dose of 9 mgkg(-1). Analgesic effects of low doses of morphine (1.5-3 mgkg(-1)) were decreased by all doses of saccharin in the late phase. Different concentrations of saccharin also affected the antagonistic effect of naloxone (0.4 mgkg(-1)) on morphine-induced analgesia in both phases of the formalin test. The high dose of saccharin (0.16%) potentiated the effect of naloxone in the late phase. The results obtained suggest that sweet sensation is an important factor in mediating morphine analgesic properties. It is therefore inappropriate to use different concentrations of sweet saccharin solutions interchangeably.     

Effect of intracerebroventricular injection of GABA receptor agents on morphine-induced antinociception in the formalin test

In the present study, the effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonists and antagonists on antinociception induced by morphine in the formalin test were investigated in rats. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of different doses of morphine (1, 3, 6 and 9 mg/kg) and intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of different doses of muscimol (0.5, 1 and 2 microg per rat) or baclofen (0.25, 0.5 and 1 microg per rat) induced a dose-related antinociception in the both first and second phases of the formalin test. The responses induced by muscimol or baclofen in both phases were reduced by bicuculline or CGP35348 [p-(3-aminopropyl)-p-diethoxymethyl-phosphinic acid], respectively. Bicuculline alone has produced antinociception in the second phase and CGP35348 alone has had antinociception in both phases of the formalin test. Morphine in combination with different doses of muscimol or baclofen did not elicit potentiation. The opioid receptor antagonist naloxone reduced the response induced by muscimol in the second phase and baclofen in both phases of the formalin test. It may be concluded that central GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptor stimulation induces antinociception in the formalin test. However, the antinociception induced by GABA receptor agonists may be mediated partly through supraspinal opioid receptor mechanisms and, for the GABA(B) receptor agonist, through spinal and supraspinal opioid receptor mechanisms.     

Characterization of socio-psychological stress-induced antinociception in the formalin test in mice

The antinociceptive effect induced by exposure to socio-psychological (PSY) stress using a communication box was assessed by the formalin test in mice, compared with those by exposure to footshock (FS) stress and forced swimming (SW) stress. After the termination of stress exposure, whereas exposure to FS- and SW-stress resulted in the attenuation of the formalin-induced biphasic pain response over 15 min, no appreciable antinociceptive effect was found in the case of PSY stress. When exposure to PSY stress was started during the period of early or late phase of pain after the formalin injection, the antinociceptive effect was maintained for 5-15 min; however, further exposure to PSY stress was not effective for producing antinociception. In the tail-pinch test, likewise, exposure to PSY stress longer than 5 min rather decreased the intensity of antinociception. We conclude that PSY stress in this tonic pain paradigm produces antinociception, but further continuous exposure to the emotional stress caused mice to become recuperative even in such a fear-inducing situation.     

Cross-tolerance between antinociception induced by swim-stress and morphine in formalin test

The present study investigated cross-tolerance between antinociception induced by water swim-stress and morphine in the formalin test. Intraperitoneal administration of morphine (3, 6 and 9 mg/kg) induced dose-dependent antinociception in both phases of the formalin test. Mice treated with a lower dose of morphine (25 mg/kg), once daily for 3 days, showed tolerance to antinociception induced by a lower test dose of morphine (3 mg/kg). Similar repeated treatments with a higher dose of morphine (50 mg/kg) produced tolerance to antinociception induced by different test doses of morphine (3, 6 and 9 mg/kg). Exposure to water swim-stress, once daily for 2 or 3 days in order to induce tolerance, also decreased morphine-induced antinociception. Swim-stress exposure for 2 or 3 days also tends to potentiate tolerance induced by a lower dose of morphine. Acute swim-stress of different durations (0.5, 1 and 3 min) induced antinociception in both phases of the formalin test, which was not reduced by naloxone, but showed even more antinociception in the second phase. The response to swim stress was decreased in mice treated with higher doses of morphine, but not those animals that received swimming stress (3 min) once daily for 2-3 days, in order to induce habituation to swim-stress-induced antinociception. The results may indicate a possible cross-tolerance between antinociception induced by morphine and by swim stress.     

Dopamine receptor mechanism(s) and antinociception and tolerance induced by swim stress in formalin test

In the present study, involvement of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in the antinociception and tolerance induced by water swim stress in the formalin test has been investigated. Water swim stress at 20 degrees C temperature induced antinociception in both phases of the formalin test. Intraperitoneal administration of the D2 dopamine receptor antagonist, sulpiride (25 and 50 mg/kg) reduced swim stress-induced antinociception in the second phase of the formalin test. A higher dose of the D1 dopamine receptor antagonist, SCH23390 (0.1 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) also reduced swim stress-induced antinociception in both phases of the test. Exposure to 3 min water swimming stress, once daily for 3 days, induced tolerance to swim stress-induced antinociception in the second phase of the formalin test. Administration of sulpiride (12.5, 25 and 50 mg/kg), during exposure to water swimming stress (once daily for 3 days), decreased tolerance in the second phase, whereas the antagonist (12.5 and 50 mg/kg) increased pain scores in the first phase of the formalin test. Sulpiride (25 mg/kg) treatment however, once daily for 3 days with no water swimming stress, did not alter swim stress-induced antinociception (0.5, 1 and 3 min tests). Similarly, repeated treatment with SCH23390 (0.05 mg/kg) and water swimming stress did not alter tolerance induced by water swimming stress. Repeated administration of the antagonist in the absence of water swimming stress also did not change swim stress-induced antinociception. The results may indicate a possible involvement of both dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the antinociception induced by swim stress and D2 receptor mechanism in the tolerance induced by repeated swim stress.     

Dopamine receptor subtypes and formalin test analgesia.

The role played by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in formalin test analgesia was explored by challenging D-amphetamine- and morphine-induced analgesia with mixed and selective D1 and D2 antagonists, and by examining the relative analgesic activity of mixed and selective D1 and D2 agonists. The mixed D1/D2 dopamine antagonist cis-flupenthixol (0.5 mg/kg), the D2 antagonist pimozide (0.5 mg/kg), and the D1 antagonist SCH 23390 (0.1 mg/kg) attenuated both D-amphetamine and morphine analgesia. The mixed D1/D2 agonist apomorphine and the selective D2 agonist quinpirole produced dose-dependent analgesia while the selective D1 agonist SKF 38393 was without effect. These data suggest that D1 receptors play an "enabling" role in D2 receptor-mediated analgesia in the formalin test.     

Synergistic antinociception of intrathecal sildenafil with clonidine in the rat formalin test

Spinal sildenafil (phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor) and clonidine (alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist) have shown antinociception. The author examined the properties of drug interaction after concurrent administration of intrathecal sildenafil-clonidine, and further clarified the reciprocity of sildenafil and clonidine. Catheters were inserted into the intrathecal space of male Sprague-Dawley rats. The formalin test was used as a nociceptive test, which was induced by subcutaneous injection of 50 µl of 5% formalin solution into the hindpaw. The pharmacological interaction was characterized using an isobolographic analysis. Intrathecal sildenafil and clonidine dose-dependently suppressed the flinching response observed during phase 1 and phase 2 in the formalin test. Isobolographic analysis revealed a synergistic interaction after intrathecal delivery of sildenafil-clonidine in both phases. Intrathecal yohimbine antagonized the antinociceptive action of intrathecal sildenafil during both phases in the formalin test. However, intrathecal ODQ failed to antagonize the antinociceptive action of intrathecal clonidine. These results suggest that sildenafil and clonidine, and the mixture of the two are effective against acute pain and facilitated pain state at the spinal level. Furthermore, synergism was noted after delivery of sildenafil-clonidine mixture. The antinociception of sildenafil can be modulated by spinal alpha-2 adrenoceptor, while the effect of clonidine is independent on the guanyly cyclase.     

Effect of imipramine on tolerance to morphine antinociception in the formalin test

In this study, the effect of imipramine on morphine antinociception in tolerant and non-tolerant mice in the formalin test, was investigated. Subcutaneous administration of different test doses of morphine (3, 6 and 9 mg/kg) and intraperitoneal injection of test doses of imipramine (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) induced a dose-dependent antinociception in non-tolerant mice, both in the first and second phases of the formalin test. The combination of morphine (1 mg/kg) with imipramine (10 mg/kg) showed a potentiated response in the second phase of the test. Combination of a single dose of morphine (1.5 mg/kg) with lower doses of imipramine (2, 4 and 8 mg/kg) did not show potentiation. The antinociceptive response of either morphine or morphine plus imipramine was reduced by the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (2 mg/ kg). In order to induce tolerance, mice were treated subcutaneously with morphine (50 mg/kg) once daily for 3 days. On day 4, the antinociceptive effect of test doses of morphine or imipramine were assessed. Tolerance to the responses of test doses of morphine (3, 6 and 9 mg/kg), but not imipramine (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) in both phases of the test was observed. Administration of lower dose of imipramine (4 mg/kg) before the test doses of morphine (3, 6 and 9 mg/kg) was not able to alter the expression of morphine tolerance. When imipramine was used during development of tolerance, either on days 1 and 2 or on days 2 and 3, the morphine tolerance in the second phase of the test was reduced. It is concluded that opioid receptor mechanism(s) may mediate the antidepressant-induced antinociception, however, imipramine may be useful in inhibiting morphine tolerance.     

Imipramine-induced antinociception in the formalin test. Receptor mechanisms involved and effect of swim stress

This study concerned the effect of swim stress on imipramine-induced antinociception in mice. The data showed that intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of different doses of imipramine (10-40 mg/kg) and 0.5-3 min of swim stress (17 degrees C) induced antinociception in the first and second phases of the formalin test. Low period of swim stress (10 s) with low doses of imipramine (2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg i.p.), which did not have any effect by themselves, in combination showed antinociception in the second phase of the test. Either yohimbine (0.5 mg/kg i.p.) or naloxone (1 mg/kg i.p.) reversed the response induced by the combination of low doses of imipramine plus swim stress. Yohimbine (1 mg/kg i.p.) decreased the response of imipramine (20 mg/kg i.p.) but not that of 30 s swim stress in the second phase. However, naloxone (1 mg/kg i.p.) reduced the antinociception induced by imipramine (20 mg/kg i.p.) or 30 s swim stress in the second phase of the test, the combination of imipramine with swim stress was not altered by yohimbine or naloxone. Prazosin induced antinociception by itself in the first phase of the test and increased swim-stress-induced antinociception with no interaction. It is concluded that antinociception induced by imipramine in the second phase of formalin test may be mediated through alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonists. The results indicate that the responses of swim stress and imipramine may be mediated by an opioid mechanism, but the combination of both drugs induced higher antinociceptive effects.     

Selective potentiation of gabapentin-mediated antinociception in the rat formalin test by the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist ABT-594

The treatment of chronic pain is hampered by various issues including multiple underlying mechanisms contributing to disease pathology and treatment-related toxicity concerns. These can be partially circumvented by combining mechanistically distinct drugs with the aim of selectively potentiating analgesia as opposed to side-effects. This approach has been used to assess the antinociceptive efficacy of the nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptor agonist ABT-594 when combined with the antiepileptic drug gabapentin, the μ-opioid receptor agonist morphine or the antidepressant drug duloxetine in the rat formalin test. Alone, ABT-594 (0.01-0.3 mg/kg) dose-dependently attenuated spontaneous flinching behaviour during first (P1) and second (P2) phase. Similarly, P1, interphase and P2 flinching were variously attenuated by gabapentin (25-200 mg/kg), morphine (0.3-3 mg/kg) and duloxetine (3-60 mg/kg). Remarkably, a completely inactive dose of ABT-594 reduced the dose of gabapentin required to produce antinociception during P1 by 4-8 fold and during P2 by 8-16 fold. This striking potentiation was blocked by mecamylamine and indicative of analgesic synergy. Similar, albeit less consistent results (3-10 fold potency increase) were obtained with morphine/ABT-594. Although a 3 fold increase in P2 antinociceptive potency was obtained with duloxetine in the presence of ABT-594, a corresponding increase in efficacy was lacking. Indeed, a mechanistically relevant reduction in antinociceptive efficacy and potency of duloxetine/ABT-594 occurred during interphase. Thus, activation of the nicotinic cholinergic system differentially modulates the antinociceptive actions of distinct mechanism of action compounds, and provides a novel framework for nACh receptor modulators mediating analgesia in the putative absence of adverse events associated with this mechanism of action.     

Involvement of GABAB receptors in the antinociception induced by baclofen in the formalin test

• 1.1. The effect of GABA receptor antagonists on baclofen-induced antinociception was examined in rats using the formalin test. Intraperitoneal (IP) administration of different doses of baclofen (2.5–10 mg kg⁻¹) to rats induced antinociception in both phases of the test.
• 2.2. The response was dose-dependent and the maximum response was observed with 10 mg kg⁻¹ of the drug. Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of baclofen (0.5−20μg/rat) also induced dose-dependent antinociception in the second phase of the formalin test.
• 3.3. The GABA_B antagonist, phaclofen (1 mg kg⁻¹, IP) but not the GABA_A antagonists picrotoxin (1 mg kg⁻¹, IP) and bicuculline (1.5 mg kg⁻¹, IP), decreased the antinociception induced by both ICV and IP administration of baclofen.
• 4.4. It is concluded that baclofen antinociception in the formalin test is mediated through GABA_B receptor activation.

     

Effect of alpha-adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists on imipramine-induced antinociception in the rat formalin test

In this study, the effect of central administration of the alpha-adrenoceptor agents on the antinociception induced by imipramine in the formalin test has been investigated. Intraperitoneal (IP) administration of different doses of imipramine (10-80 mg/kg) and intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine (0.05-0.8 microg/rat) elicited a dose-dependent antinociception in the both phases of the test. Furthermore, different doses of clonidine (0.05-0.2 microg/rat) increased the antinociception induced by imipramine (10 and 20 mg/kg). The alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine (2 microg/rat, ICV) reduced the response of a low dose imipramine (10 mg/kg, IP) plus different doses of clonidine (0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 microg/rat, ICV), but did not alter the response induced by higher doses of imipramine (20 and 40 mg/kg) alone or in combination with clonidine. Yohimbine by itself elicited no effect. The alpha(1)-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine (0.07-1.5 microg/rat) induced antinociception in both phases of the formalin test, but did not alter the imipramine-induced antinociception. The alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin neither elicited antinociception nor altered the imipramine response. Yohimbine (2 microg/ rat, ICV) in combination with prazosin (0.5 microg/rat, ICV) caused more inhibition of the response of imipramine or imipramine plus clonidine. Therefore, it is concluded that alpha(2)-adrenoceptor mechanism may be involved in the imipramine-induced antinociception.     

Microinjection of histamine into the dentate gyrus produces antinociception in the formalin test in rats

The present study was aimed to investigate the effects of microinjection of histamine, chlorpheniramine (a histamine H₁ receptor antagonist), ranitidine (a histamine H₂ receptor antagonist) and thioperamide (a histamine H₃ receptor antagonist) into the dentate gyrus on the formalin-induced pain. A biphasic pattern (first phase: 0-5 min and second phase: 15-60 min) in nociceptive responses was induced after subcutaneous injection of formalin (50 μl, 2.5%) into the ventral surface of the right hind paw. Microinjection of histamine (1 and 2 μg) into the dentate gyrus decreased the intensity of nociceptive responses. Intra-dentate gyrus microinjection of chlorpheniramine and ranitidine at the same doses of 1 and 4 μg had no effects, whereas thioperamide at a dose of 4 μg suppressed both phases of formalin-induced pain. Pretreatments with chlorpheniramine and ranitidine at the same dose of 4 μg prevented histamine (2 μg)-induced antinociception, while thioperamide (4 μg) increased histamine (2 μg)-induced antinociception. These results indicated that activation of brain neuronal histamine at the levels of dentate gyrus produced antinociception. The post-synaptic H₁, H₂ receptors and pre-synaptic H₃ receptors of histamine may be involved in the histamine-induced antinociception at the level of the dentate gyrus.     

The role of dopamine receptors in ventrolateral orbital cortex-evoked antinociception in a rat formalin test model

The present study examined the roles of dopamine and D(1)- and D(2)-like dopamine receptors in ventrolateral orbital cortex (VLO)-evoked antinociception in rats with persistent inflammatory pain. Following formalin injection into the rat unilateral hindpaw pad, the effects of dopamine receptor agonist and antagonist microinjections into the VLO on nociceptive behavior were observed. Results demonstrated that VLO microinjection of the non-selective dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine (R(-)-apomorphine hydrochloride, 1.0, 2.5 and 5.0μg) depressed later-phase nociceptive behavior induced by formalin injection; this effect was attenuated by the D(2)-like dopamine receptor antagonist S(-)-raclopride(+)-tartrate salt (raclopride, 3.0μg), but not by the D(1)-like dopamine receptor antagonist R(+)-SCH-23390 hydrochloride (SCH-23390, 1.0μg). Apomorphine-induced antinociception was mimicked by microinjection of the D(2)-like dopamine receptor agonist (-)-quinpirole hydrochloride (2.0 and 5.0μg) into the same VLO site, and this effect was antagonized by raclopride (3.0μg). In addition, microinjection of the D(1)-like dopamine receptor agonist R(+)-SKF-38393 hydrochloride (5.0μg) had no effect on formalin-induced nociceptive behavior during the later phase. However, the D(1)-like dopamine receptor antagonist SCH-23390 (2.5, 5.0 and 10μg) depressed nociceptive behavior in a dose-dependent manner. These results suggested that dopamine mediated VLO-induced antinociception via different mechanisms in the persistent inflammatory pain model; D(2)-like receptors mediated dopamine-induced antinociception, while D(1)-like dopamine receptors exhibited tonic facilitatory action on nociceptive behavior, thereby blocking D(1)-like dopamine receptors could induce antinociception.     

Yohimbine produces antinociception in the formalin test in rats: involvement of serotonin1A receptors

Rationale: Previous studies have suggested that the α₂-adrenergic receptor antagonist yohimbine produced antinociceptive effects in the formalin test in rats. However, yohimbine is also an agonist at serotonin (5-HT)_1A receptors, suggesting the possibility that the antinociceptive effects of yohimbine might be mediated via these receptors. Objective: The purpose of the present studies was to evaluate the potential role of 5-HT_1A receptors in mediating the antinociceptive effects of yohimbine. Methods: The antinociceptive effects of yohimbine were evaluated using the formalin test in rats. Results: Yohimbine (2.5–10 mg/kg s.c.) produced dose-related antinociception during both phase I and phase II of the formalin test, and was approximately equipotent and equiefficacious to morphine. The selective 5-HT_1A receptor antagonist WAY 100,635 (0.03–3.0 mg/kg s.c.) produced a partial reversal of yohimbine. In comparison, the selective 5-HT_1A receptor agonist (±)8-hydroxy- dipropylaminotetralin HBr (8OH-DPAT; 1.0 mg/kg s.c.) also produced a dose-related antinociception in the formalin test, although 8OH-DPAT was completely reversed by WAY 100,635 (3.0 mg/kg s.c.). The antinociceptive effects of yohimbine were not antagonized by the 5-HT_1B/1D antagonist GR 127935 (1.0 mg/kg and 3.0 mg/kg s.c.), the 5-HT₂ antagonist LY53857 (1.0 mg/kg s.c.), or the 5-HT₃ antagonist zatosetron (3.0 mg/kg s.c.). Conclusions: The present results demonstrate that yohimbine produces a dose-related antinociception in the formalin test in rats which is mediated in part by the agonistic actions at 5-HT_1A receptors. Received: 10 September 1999 / Final version: 5 November 1999