Admixture of propofol and alfentanil

An admixture of propofol and alfentanil provides adequate sedation and analgesia during transvaginal oocyte retrieval in the absence of a paracervical block. In 100 patients the technique provided haemodynamic stability, sedation which was easily controlled, rapid recovery and universal patient acceptance.     

The influence of alfentanil on the intubating conditions after priming with vecuronium

The ability of alfentanil 15 micrograms kg-1 or 30 micrograms kg-1 to improve intubating conditions was studied in four groups of 25 ASA class 1 patients. Induction of anaesthesia was with thiopentone 5 mg kg-1. Neuromuscular blockade was induced with vecuronium using the priming principle. The priming dose, priming interval and intubating dose were 0.01 mg kg-1, 4 min, and 0.1 mg kg-1, respectively. Intubation was attempted 1 min after the intubating dose. Intubating conditions were judged unacceptable in about 30% of the patients belonging to the control groups. Alfentanil 15 micrograms kg-1, when administered 65 s before intubation, reduced the incidence of coughing and diaphragmatic movement (P less than 0.05) but did not reduce the incidence of overall unacceptable intubating conditions. Alfentanil 30 micrograms kg-1, however, reduced the incidence of vocal cord movement (P less than 0.005) as well as coughing and diaphragmatic movement (P less than 0.002). Alfentanil 30 micrograms kg-1 reduced the incidence of unacceptable intubating conditions from about 30% to 4% (P less than 0.02).     

Facilitated tracheal intubation in infants: is propofol a safe alternative to atracurium?

The conditions for intubation were studied in 28 infants (age 1–14 months, ASA I/II) after intravenous administration of propofol or atracurium. Anaesthesia was induced via mask with halothane and N₂O/O₂. The study propofol group (GrP, n= 14) received a bolus of propofol 3.0 mg·kg^?1, whilst the control atracurium group (GrA, n= 14) received atracurium 0.4 mg·kg^?1. Intubation conditions were listed as excellent, moderate or impossible in GrP 79%–14%?7% and in GrA 72%–14%–14% respectively. A decrease of mean arterial pressure (GrP–9.17 ± 10.8 mmHg, ?13% GrA–9.67 ± 15.2 mmHg, ?12%) and heart rate (GrP–18 ± 21 bpm; GrA–14 ± 23 bpm) were seen after induction with halothane. After intubation the mean arterial pressure increased. The increase of heart rate observed after intubation was higher in GrA (GrP +6 ± 8 bpm; GrA +17 ± 19 bpm). The same intubation scores found with propofol in comparison with atracurium may be due to the reflex-suppressive and stress-inhibitory effect of propofol. Since excellent conditions for intubation were found with comparable smaller effects on measured haemodynamic parameters, propofol is regarded as a safe alternative to atracurium to facilitate intubation.     

The use of propofol and alfentanil by infusion in military anaesthesia

A total intravenous technique using propofol and alfentanil was used successfully in four battlefield casualties treated at a British Military Field Hospital during the recent Gulf conflict. All patients made a rapid recovery of adequate quality for prompt evacuation. We believe that the use of propofol and alfentanil as an induction and maintenance regimen for military anaesthesia merits further evaluation and comparison with established techniques.     

Injection pain, intubating conditions and cardiovascular changes following induction of anaesthesia with propofol alone or in combination with alfentanil

In a double-blind study, propofol (P) 2-2.5 mg.kg-1 preceded by saline (Sal) or alfentanil (A) 20-30 micrograms.kg-1 was used for anaesthetic induction in 59 young patients of ASA physical class I or II, premedicated with oxycodone 0.1 mg.kg-1 and atropine 0.01 mg.kg-1 i.m. The patients were randomly allocated to one of the four groups: Group 1 Sal + P2.5, Group 2 A20 + P2.5, Group 3 A30 + P2.5 and Group 4 A30 + P2. Pain on injection of propofol occurred in 67, 36 and 7% of the patients in the Sal + P2.5, A20 + P2.5 and A30 + P2 groups, respectively, but not at all in the A30 + P2.5 group. Intubating conditions were assessed as good, moderate, poor or impossible on the basis of jaw relaxation, ease of insertion of the tube and coughing on intubation, each on a three-point scale. In impossible cases, suxamethonium was used. In the Sal + P2.5 group, the frequencies of good, moderate, poor and impossible intubating conditions were 0, 38, 8 and 54%, respectively. The corresponding figures in the A30 + P2.5 group were 43, 46, 7 and 14% (P less than 0.05 between the groups). The other groups did not differ significantly from the Sal + P2.5 group. After injection of propofol, both systolic and diastolic arterial pressures decreased significantly in all other groups, with the exception of diastolic pressure in the Sal + P2.5 group, whereas heart rate did not differ from the control level. After intubation, systolic arterial pressure increased statistically significantly in the Sal + P2.5 and A30 + P2 groups and diastolic arterial pressure in all other groups with the exception of the A30 + P2.5 group when compared with the corresponding preceding values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Haemodynamic effects of intravenous clonidine on propofol or thiopental induction

The study evaluated the effects of premedication with intravenous clonidine on thiopental or propofol requirements for induction and haemodynamic changes associated with both induction and endotracheal intubation. Clonidine administered intravenously before induction of anaesthesia reduced propofol or thiopental requirements. The association of clonidine and propofol caused, after injection of the induction drug, a decrease in mean arterial pressure which was significantly greater than with thiopental. Moreover, a major haemodynamic stability was registered before and after laryngoscopy in the clonidine-thiopental group. These findings might contraindicate the clonidine-propofol combination in patients with cardiovascular disease.     

Recurrent respiratory depression after total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil

Since first commented upon by Lamarche in 1984, several cases of recurrent respiratory arrest after alfentanil infusions have been reported. In all these cases the alfentanil infusions have been used to supplement conventional anaesthetic techniques with nitrous oxide and/or inhalational agents and in most cases rather high total alfentanil doses have been administered. We have seen two cases of severe recurrent respiratory depression in healthy patients after relatively minor procedures performed under total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol–alfentanil infusions, air–oxygen ventilation and muscle relaxation, where the alfentanil doses administered were quite small. These cases are presented in detail and compared within a tabulated presentation with the earlier published cases of alfentanil-related recurrent respiratory depression.     

A cost-benefit evaluation of using propofol and alfentanil for a short gynecological procedure

It is well established that the immediate recovery after propofol or alfentanil anesthesia is short. Although the drugs themselves are more expensive than older drugs, a potential for saving costs arises. Concerning the benefits in terms of late recovery, less information is available. With vaginal termination of pregnancy (VTP), anesthesia is supposed to be the major cause of sick-leave. Does propofol and alfentanil anesthesia for VTP reduce sick-leave compared with thiopental and nitrous oxide anesthesia, and do the increased costs of the drugs outweigh the reduced costs of sick-leave? Data were obtained from 39 of 40 patients in ASA class I accepted for VTP and allocated to either propofol and alfentanil anesthesia (PA) or thiopental and nitrous oxide anesthesia (TN). A questionnaire was filled in by the patients at home after regaining full fitness. The number of patients with a sick-leave of 2 days or less in the groups was compared statistically with the number of patients with 3 days or more off work. The economic impact from the reported sick-leave was calculated for each study group, using data from national statistics. The figures were compared with the calculated costs of the drugs. The median number of days of sick-leave was 1 in the PA-group and 2 in the TN-group (range 0–3 and 0–5, respectively). Nineteen of the 20 patients in the PA-group and 13 of the 19 patients in the TN-group needed a short sick-leave period of 2 days or less (one-sided test of proportions, P<0.05). At the time of the study each patient was paid 210 SEK/day from the social insurance system and the mean cost of the drugs was 72 and 15 SEK/patient in the PA- and TN-groups, respectively. Using the mean difference in sick-leave between the groups of 0.8 days/patient (rather than the difference in median values of 1), a net gain of 111 SEK/patient was the result of changing from thiopental-nitrous oxide anesthesia to propofol-alfentanil anesthesia. Although the cost of drugs was higher, costs for the social insurance system and for the individuals themselves were reduced by almost 50%, when using the propofol and alfentanil combination, resulting in an overall benefit corresponding to almost twice the increase in the cost of anesthesia.     

Reversal of rocuronium with edrophonium during propofol versus sevoflurane anesthesia

BACKGROUND: The use of volatile anesthetics for maintenance of anesthesia can enhance the action of non-depolarizing muscle relaxants and interfere with the reversal of neuromuscular blockade. In this study, we studied the antagonism of rocuronium with edrophonium-atropine during propofol- versus sevoflurane-based anesthesia. METHODS: Following induction of anesthesia with propofol (2-2.5 mg kg(-1), i.v.) and fentanyl (1-2 microg kg(-1) i.v.), rocuronium 0.6 mg kg(-1) i.v. was administered to facilitate tracheal intubation. Patients were then randomized to receive either a propofol infusion (100 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) or sevoflurane (1.0%, end-tidal) in combination with nitrous oxide 66% for maintenance of anesthesia. Neuromuscular blockade was monitored using electromyography at the wrist, and reversed with edrophonium 1.0 mg kg(-1) and atropine 0.015 mg kg(-1) when the first twitch hight (T1) of the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation recovered to 25% of the baseline value. Anesthetic maintenance with propofol or sevoflurane was continued following reversal until a TOF ratio of 0.7 was attained. RESULTS: The clinical duration of action (i.e., time to 25% T1 recovery) was similar during both propofol- (39.3+/-14.6 min) and sevoflurane-based (48.1+/-19.7 min) anesthesia. However, the reversal time from 25% T1 to TOF ratio of 0.7 was significantly longer with sevoflurane [Median 2.8 (range 0.5-18.8) min] compared with propofol [1.5 (0.75-3) min] (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the clinical duration of action after a single dose of rocuronium, 0.6 mg kg(-1) i.v., was similar during both propofol- and sevoflurane-based anesthesia. However, the reversal of rocuronium-induced residual blockade was slower and more variable in the presence of sevoflurane.     

Tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blockade in children: a comparison of propofol combined either with alfentanil or remifentanil

Forty healthy children, aged between two and 12 years of age undergoing elective surgery where the anaesthetic technique involved tracheal intubation followed by spontaneous ventilation were studied. Induction of anaesthesia was with either alfentanil 15 μg·kg^?1 or remifentanil 1 μg·kg^?1 followed by propofol 4 mg·kg^?1 to which lignocaine 0.2 mg·kg^?1 had been added. Intubating conditions were graded on a four point scale for ease of laryngoscopy, vocal cord position, degree of coughing, jaw relaxation and limb movement. All children were successfully intubated at the first attempt. There were no significant differences in the assessments of intubating conditions between the two groups. Arterial blood pressure and heart changes were similar in the two groups with both alfentanil and remifentanil attenuating the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. The time taken to resumption of spontaneous ventilation was similar in both groups.     

Tracheal intubation after induction of anaesthesia with propofol,alfentanil and lidocaine without neuromuscular blocking drugs in children

In a double-blind study, intubating conditions and haemodynamic responses were assessed in two age-groups of 45 ASA I-II children, with mean ages of 2.4 and 6.3 years, premedicated with oral midazolam and atropine. The children were randomly allocated to one of three groups: aifentanil 20 μg · kg^-1 + lidocaine 1 mg · kg^-1 (AIRO + Lign); alfentanil 20 μg μ kg^-1 (Alf20); or alfentanil 40 μg · kg^-1 (Alf40), followed by propofol 3.5 mg · kg^-1 in the children aged 1–3 years and 3.0 mg · kg^-1 in the older children. Intubating conditions, 40 s after the administration of propofol, were assessed as good, moderate or impossible on the basis of jaw relaxation, ease of insertion of the endotracheal tube and coughing during intubation. In the younger age group the frequencies of good, moderate or impossible intubating conditions were 87, 13 and 0% in the Alf40, 40, 60 and 0% in the Alf20 (P < 0.05 compared to the Alf40 group) and 53, 47 and 0% in the Alf20 + Lign group. In the older age group the corresponding frequencies were 60, 33 and 7% in the Alf20 + Lign, 47, 53 and 0% in the Alf20 and 47, 40 and 13% in the Alf40 group. All the drugs prevented any increase in arterial pressure and heart rate after tracheal intubation. The QTc interval of the EGG was always in the normal range. Clinically important bradycardia did not occur. In conclusion, the best intubating conditions occurred after propofol 3.5 mg · kg^-1 and alfentanil 40 μg · kg^-1 in the younger age group. In the other children good or moderate intubating conditions occurred in 87–100% after all the drugs used in the present study.     

The haemodynamic effects of bronchoscopy Comparison of propofol and thiopentone with and without alfentanil pretreatment

The haemodynamic response to bronchoscopy under general anaesthesia was investigated. Forty patients were allocated at random to receive either thiopentone or propofol; half the patients in each group received in addition 18 micrograms/kg of alfentanil one minute before induction of anaesthesia. The heart rate, noninvasive blood pressure and Holter ECG was monitored in all patients. Significant increases in heart rate (p less than 0.05), systolic and diastolic arterial pressures (p less than 0.01) occurred in the thiopentone only group, following bronchoscopy. Systolic and diastolic arterial pressure decreased in patients receiving thiopentone plus alfentanil, following induction of anaesthesia and laryngoscopy (p less than 0.05). No significant haemodynamic changes were seen in either of the groups which received propofol. ST segment changes on subsequent Holter analysis were seen in four patients, but there were no significant differences between the groups. Anaesthesia with propofol alone provides adequate haemodynamic stability for bronchoscopy and the addition is superfluous.     

Midazolam/propofol but not propofol alone reversibly depress the swallowing reflex

General anaesthetics depress swallowing and this is a reason to delay oral intake after general anaesthesia. The swallowing reflex was studied 2 h after general anaesthesia for patients undergoing colonoscopy. Forty–one patients were anaesthetized with midazolam 75 μgkg^-1 followed by a continuous infusion of propofol and 39 patients with propofol 1.5 mgkg^-1 bolus followed by an infusion. Swallowing reflex was measured by electromyography 2 h after induction of anaesthesia, before and 5 min after the administration of flumazenil (0.2 mg) or placebo. Two h after anaesthesia, the state of consciousness was almost normal in all patients and did not change after flumazenil. At two hours, the latency times for the swallowing reflex in patients treated with propofol alone were of 1.4 ± 0.4 s and were significantly shorter ( P < 0.05) than the value of 1.9 ± 0.8 s observed in patients who received midazolam with propofol. In the latter group the latency time of the swallowing reflex was significantly reduced following the administration of flumazenil but not placebo. In patients who received propofol without midazolam, the administration of flumazenil or placebo was not associated with significant changes in the latency times. There were also no significant differences in the latency times in the subgroup that received midazolam followed by flumazenil and the propofol alone groups that did or did not receive flumazenil. These results suggest that midazolam still exerts a depressive effect on the swallowing reflex 2 h after its administration despite the recovery of normal consciousness.     

Tracheal intubating conditions using propofol and remifentanil target-controlled infusions

Using target-controlled infusions (TCI) we aimed to determine the most appropriate dose of remifentanil required for intubation, using a steady effect-site concentration of propofol and without the use of neuromuscular blocking drugs. Sixty ASA III patients presenting for elective surgery were randomly allocated to one of three groups. Anaesthesia was induced in all patients using a target-controlled infusion of propofol 6.5 microg x ml(-1). This was reduced to 3 microg x ml(-1) after 1 min. Each group received a different TCI of remifentanil, 19, 15 or 11 ng x ml(-1), which was reduced to 10, 8 or 6 ng x ml(-1), respectively, after 1 min. Laryngoscopy and intubation were attempted at 4 min. Laryngoscopy and ease of intubation were assessed using a standard scoring system. Intubation was considered satisfactory in 75% of patients in groups 1 and 2 and 35% of patients in group 3. Intubation was successful in 20/20, 19/20 and 15/20 patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Pulse oximetry, heart rate and noninvasive arterial pressure were measured pre-induction, and at intervals until after laryngoscopy and intubation. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate decreased following induction of anaesthesia in all groups, which was statistically significant. Following laryngoscopy, MAP and heart rate increased, but were significantly less than the corresponding baseline values.     

Growth of Escherichia coli in propofol, lidocaine, and mixtures of propofol and lidocaine

BACKGROUND: Microorganisms grow rapidly in propofol. Extrinsic contamination of propofol is thought to be a source of postoperative sepsis and wound infection. We studied growth of a strain of Escherichia coli in thiopental, propofol, lidocaine, and mixtures of propofol and lidocaine. METHODS: The pathogen was exposed to 2.5% thiopental; 1.0% propofol; 1.0%, 2.0% and 4.0% preservative-free lidocaine; and propofol solutions containing 0.25%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0%, or 4.0% lidocaine for 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24 h at room temperature, respectively. The inocula from these suspensions were cultured for 48 h at 37 degrees C after the antimicrobial activity of the local anesthetics in the inocula was inactivated by a 1:1000 dilution with distilled water. RESULTS: No organisms grew after exposure to 2.5% thiopental. The exposure of E. coli to propofol increased the colony count to approximately 90 times the control count. The colony counts of E. coli after exposure to 1.0%, 2.0% and 4.0% lidocaine and 0.25%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0% and 4.0% lidocaine in 1.0% propofol were lower than the counts after exposure to 1.0% propofol (P = 0.0048, 0.0027, 0.0003, 0.0503, 0.0188, 0.0080, 0.0044, and 0.0001, respectively). The growth rate of the microorganism was significantly higher in cultures exposed to 1.0% propofol than that in cultures exposed to lidocaine alone or lidocaine-propofol mixtures (P < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Lidocaine possesses bacteriostatic activity against E. coli. Addition of lidocaine to propofol confers its bacteriostatic activity to the mixture and may decrease the hazard of infection associated with the extrinsic contamination of propofol.     

Opioid supplementation to propofol anaesthesia for outpatient abortion: a comparison between alfentanil, fentanyl and placebo

One hundred and sixty-four patients scheduled for elective termination of pregnancy under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to receive one of three different supplements to propofol and oxygen in nitrous oxide anaesthesia: 0.1 mg fentanyl, 0.5 mg alfentanil or placebo. Postoperative pain and nausea, as well as complications during anaesthesia were studied. There were no differences in complications or complaints by surgeons during anaesthesia, and no patient in any group reacted unsatisfactorily to surgery. The patients in the placebo group consumed significantly more propofol during the procedure (P less than 0.001). No differences were seen in time until hospital discharge between the three groups. Complaints about postoperative pain were significantly less frequent among patients receiving fentanyl (P less than 0.01). The number of patients requesting postoperative analgetics, however, did not differ. There was no difference in the frequency of nausea or vomiting, but postoperative pain was found significantly to increase complaints of nausea (P less than 0.01) and also time until hospital discharge (P less than 0.01). In conclusion, opioid supplementation lowered the amount of propofol needed for anaesthesia. Alfentanil 0.5 mg did not improve the postoperative course. Fentanyl 0.1 mg decreased the frequency of postoperative pain without increasing the time to hospital discharge.     

Influence of anaesthesia and muscle relaxation on intubating conditions and sympathoadrenal response to tracheal intubation

Background : The study aimed to assess the relative influence of anaesthesia and muscle relaxation on intubating conditions and the haemodynamic and catecholamine responses to tracheal intubation.
Methods : Sixty ASA 1 or 2 patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups (15 patients each) that differed in the depth of anaesthesia (thiopentone plus fentanyl 2.5 μg kg^-1 or thiopentone alone) and the degree of vecuronium–induced neuromuscular block (100% or _>: 65%) at intubation. Muscle relaxation was measured at 0.1 Hz by means of mechanomyography. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were measured before and after induction of anaesthesia, and 1 min and 5 min following intubation, while adrenaline (A) and noradrenaline concentrations (NA) were determined from arterial blood samples.
Results : Intubating conditions were improved primarily by providing complete muscle relaxation at the adductor pollicis muscle (P<0.001) and to a lesser extent by adding fentanyl to thiopentone (P=0.04). The response of HR and MAP to tracheal intubation was attenuated mainly by fentanyl (P<0.001). Complete muscle relaxation further diminished the response of MAP to intubation (P=0.03). Changes in A and NA were dependent on the depth of anaesthesia only (P =>0.01).
Conclusion : The results of the study demonstrate that the sympathoadrenal response to intubation is attenuated by adding fentanyl (2.5 kg^-1) to an induction regimen with thiopentone, whereas provision of complete muscle relaxation at the adductor pollicis muscle is necessary to attain smooth intubating conditions.     

Effective time to satisfactory intubation conditions after administration of rocuronium in adults. Comparison of propofol and thiopentone for rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia

We determined the effective time to satisfactory intubation conditions after the administration of rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1 to 120 unpremedicated adult patients anaesthetised with propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 or thiopentone 5 mg.kg-1. Intubation conditions were assessed in 10 subgroups of 12 patients at 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70 s. The effective times to satisfactory intubation conditions in 50 and 90% of patients were obtained by the method of maximum likelihood after log time-probit response transformations. Intubation conditions after induction of anaesthesia with propofol were satisfactory in 5/12 patients at 30 s, 7/12 at 40 s, 10/12 at 50 s, 11/12 at 60 s and 11/12 at 70 s compared with 1/12 patients at 30 s, 2/12 at 40 s, 5/12 at 50 s, 7/12 at 60 s and 8/12 at 70 s after induction with thiopentone. The effective times to satisfactory intubation conditions in 50% and 90% (95% confidence intervals) of patients after rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1 were 34 (26-40) s and 61 (50-81) s in patients given propofol compared with 57 (48-69) s and 101 (79-167) s in patients given thiopentone. We conclude that rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1 may be a suitable alternative to suxamethonium during rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia with propofol in situations where suxamethonium is contraindicated.     

Tracheal intubating conditions after induction with sevoflurane 8% in children. A comparison with two intravenous techniques

We studied tracheal intubating conditions in 120 healthy children, aged 3-12 years, in a blinded, randomised clinical trial. Children were randomly allocated to one of three groups: group PS, propofol 3 mg.kg-1 and succinylcholine 1 mg.kg-1 (n = 40); group PA, propofol 3 mg.kg-1 and alfentanil 10 microg.kg-1 (n = 40); group SF, sevoflurane 8% in 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen for 3 min (n = 40). Tracheal intubating conditions were graded according to ease of laryngoscopy, position of vocal cords, coughing, jaw relaxation and movement of limbs. Overall intubating conditions were acceptable in 39 of 40 children in the propofol/succinylcholine group, 21 of 40 children in the propofol/alfentanil group and 35 of 40 children in the sevoflurane group. Children receiving propofol and succinylcholine or sevoflurane had better intubating conditions overall than those given propofol and alfentanil (p < 0.01). In conclusion, anaesthetic induction and tracheal intubation using sevoflurane 8% for 3 min is a satisfactory alternative to propofol with succinylcholine in children.