Resistance to the migration of microorganisms of a needle-free disinfectable connector

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a disinfectable needle-free connector in reducing the pass of micro-organisms to the lumen of the catheter. A prospective, controlled, experimental trial was performed in which a laboratory model simulated the insertion of a peripheral venous catheter. Catheters inserted in sterile conditions in a hemoculture bottle were closed with the disinfectable needle-free connector (study group) or with a cap (control group). After 9 days of contamination and manipulation of the connector and cap external surfaces, 100% of bottles in the control group were contaminated whereas 60% remained sterile in the study group. The disinfectable needle-free connector showed more resistance to the pass of microorganisms than the conventional cap according to our experimental model.     

Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections

PURPOSE: To review the literature on prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE database, conference proceedings, and bibliographies of review articles and book chapters were searched for relevant articles. Primary authors were contacted directly if data were incomplete. STUDY SELECTION: Studies met the following criteria unless otherwise stated: Trials were prospective and randomized; catheters were inserted into new sites, not into old sites over guidewires; catheter cultures were done by using semi-quantitative or quantitative methods; and, for prospective studies, catheter-related bloodstream infection was confirmed by microbial growth from percutaneously drawn blood cultures that matched catheter cultures. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on population, methods, preventive strategy, and outcome (measured as catheter-related bloodstream infections) were gathered. The quality of the data was graded by using preestablished criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: The recommended preventive strategies with the strongest supportive evidence are full barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; subcutaneous tunneling short-term catheters inserted in the internal jugular or femoral veins when catheters are not used for drawing blood; contamination shields for pulmonary artery catheters; povidone-iodine ointment applied to insertion sites of hemodialysis catheters; specialized nursing teams caring for patients with short-term peripheral venous catheters, especially at institutions with a high incidence of catheter-related infection; no routine replacement of central venous catheters; antiseptic chamberfilled hub or hub-protective antiseptic sponge for central venous catheters; and use of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated or minocycline-rifampin-impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies that do not incorporate antimicrobial agents (for example, maximal barrier precautions). CONCLUSIONS: Simple interventions can reduce the risk for serious catheter-related infection. Adequately powered randomized trials are needed.     

Incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection in a general hospital using two different detection methods

Introduction

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) in a general hospital, using two different assessment methods.

Methods

Method A: One observer prospectively followed up all patients with central venous catheters (CVCs) placed in our hospital over a period of 1 year, recording all CRBSI episodes. Incidence was calculated in two ways, in relation to the total number of catheter days, and in relation to the total number of hospital days of all patients hospitalized during this period. Method B: Another observer recorded all CRBSI episodes diagnosed during the same time period using microbiology data in which blood culture and catheter culture were positive for the same microorganism. Incidence was calculated in relation to the total number of hospital days of all hospitalized patients.The patient's demographic characteristics and the catheter-related variables were recorded and analysed. Based on clinical and microbiological criteria, catheters were classified as uninfected, colonized, or CRBSI.

Results

Over the study period, 878 central venous catheters were placed in 704 patients. The total number of catheter days was 7357, and the mean duration of catheter use was 8.15 days (1–86). The total number of hospital stays in this period was 92,167.Method A: 15 episodes of CRBSI were detected, yielding an overall incidence of 2.03 episodes/1000 catheter days or 0.16 episodes/1000 hospital days. Method B: 11 episodes of CRBSI, with an incidence of 0.12 episodes/1000 hospital days.

Conclusion

The two methods studied yielded different CRBSI rates, with a higher incidence reported by prospective follow-up (Method A). In addition, this method enabled a better assessment to be made of CRBSI risk as the calculation could be performed in relation to the days patients were catheterized.     

Effects of a Quality Improvement Program to Reduce Central Venous Catheter-Related Infections in Hemodialysis Patients

BackgroundCentral catheter infections are of concern in patients on hemodialysis because of the high risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections, sepsis, and death. Adequate nursing is critical for the prevention of such infections. This study aimed to use the PDCA (plan-do-check-act) method to reduce the incidence of central venous catheter infection using management in the maintenance of central venous catheter in patients on hemodialysis, compared with routine care.MethodsThis pilot study recruited patients on hemodialysis via central venous catheterization at the Blood Purification Center of Ruijin Hospital between November 2017 and November 2018. The patients were randomized to the routine and PDCA groups. All participants received routine nursing. The PDCA group received central venous catheter management by PDCA. The incidence of central venous catheterization-related infections, nursing satisfaction, and quality of life were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 122 participants were enrolled in each group. The incidence of central catheter-related bloodstream infection, as the primary outcome, was 0.8 and 8.8 cases per 1000 catheter days in the PDCA and routine groups, respectively (P < 0.001). In addition, as the secondary outcomes, the scores of nursing satisfaction (health guidance, nursing technology, and therapeutic effects) score and quality of life (physiological, psychological, social, and environmental status) were better in the PDCA group than in the routine group (all P < 0.01).ConclusionsThis pilot study suggests that the PDCA cycle model can effectively reduce the incidence of central venous catheter-related infections and improve satisfaction and quality of life in patients on hemodialysis.     

Genotypic study documents divergence in the pathogenesis of bloodstream infection related central venous catheters in neonates

ObjectiveTo investigate the pathogenesis of bloodstream infection by Staphylococcus epidermidis, using the molecular epidemiology, in high-risk neonates.MethodsWe conducted a prospective study of a cohort of neonates with bloodstream infection using central venous catheters for more than 24 h. “National Healthcare Safety Network” surveillance was conducted. Genotyping was performed by DNA fingerprinting and mecA genes and icaAD were detected by multiplex-PCR.ResultsFrom April 2006 to April 2008, the incidence of bloodstream infection and central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection was 15.1 and 13.0/1000 catheter days, respectively, with S. epidermidis accounting for 42.9% of episodes. Molecular analysis was used to document the similarity among six isolates of bloodstream infection by S. epidermidis from cases with positive blood and central venous catheter tip cultures. Fifty percent of neonates had bloodstream infection not identified as definite or probable central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection. Only one case was considered as definite central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection and was extraluminally acquired; the remaining were considered probable central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections, with one probable extraluminally and another probable intraluminally acquired bloodstream infection. Additionally, among mecA+ and icaAD+ samples, one clone (A) was predominant (80%). A polyclonal profile was found among sensitive samples that were not carriers of the icaAD gene.ConclusionsThe majority of infections caused by S. epidermidis in neonates had an unknown origin, although 33.3% appeared to have been acquired intraluminally and extraluminally. We observed a polyclonal profile between sensitive samples and a prevalent clone (A) between resistant samples.     

Use of tunneled femoral catheters to prevent catheter-related infection. A randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The risk for catheter-related infection seems higher with femoral catheters than with catheters inserted at other sites. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of catheter tunneling on femoral catheter-related infection in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Three intensive care units at academic hospitals in Paris, France. PATIENTS: 345 adult patients requiring a femoral venous catheter for more than 48 hours. INTERVENTION: Tunneled or nontunneled femoral catheters. MEASUREMENTS: Time to occurrence of systemic catheter-related sepsis, catheter-related bloodstream infection, and quantitative catheter tip culture with a cutoff of 10(3) colony-forming units/mL. RESULTS: Of 345 randomly assigned patients, 336 were evaluable. Probable systemic catheter-related sepsis occurred in 15 of 168 patients who received a nontunneled femoral catheter (controls) and in 5 of 168 patients who received a tunneled femoral catheter (estimated absolute risk reduction, 6% [95% CI, 0.9% to 11%]). Time to occurrence of catheter-related bloodstream infection was not significantly modified (relative risk, 0.28 [CI, 0.03 to 1.92]; P = 0.18); 3 events occurred in the control group and 1 event occurred in the tunneled-catheter group. After stratification by treatment center and adjustment for variables that were prognostic (use of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents at catheter insertion) or imbalanced between both groups (mechanical ventilation at insertion), tunnelized catheterization reduced the proportion of patients who developed systemic catheter-related sepsis (relative risk, 0.25 [CI, 0.09 to 0.72]; P = 0.005) and positive quantitative culture of the catheter tip (relative risk, 0.48 [CI, 0.23 to 0.99]; P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: The incidence of femoral catheter-related infections in critically ill patients can be reduced by using subcutaneous tunneling.     

Are antiseptic-coated central venous catheters effective in a real-world setting?

BACKGROUND: Catheter-related bloodstream infections are common, costly, and morbid. Randomized controlled trials indicate that antiseptic-coated central venous catheters reduce infection rates. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and economic effectiveness of antiseptic-coated catheters for critically ill patients in a real-world setting. METHODS: Central venous catheters coated with chlorhexidine/silver-sulfadiazene were introduced in all patients requiring central venous access in adult intensive care units at the University of Michigan Health System, a large, tertiary care teaching hospital. A pretest-posttest cohort design measured the primary outcome of catheter-related bloodstream infection rate, comparing the 2 years prior to the intervention with the 2 years following the intervention. We also evaluated cost-effectiveness and changes in vancomycin use. RESULTS: The intervention was associated with a 4% per month relative reduction in the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection, after controlling for the effects of time. Overall, a 35% relative risk reduction (P < .0003) in the catheter-related bloodstream infection rate occurred in the posttest phase. The use of antiseptic-coated catheters reduced costs more than $100,000 annually. Vancomycin use was less in units in which antiseptic catheters were used compared with wards in which these catheters were not used. CONCLUSION: Antiseptic-coated catheters appear to be clinically effective and economically efficient in a real-world setting.     

Antibiotic-coated hemodialysis catheters for the prevention of vascular catheter-related infections: a prospective, randomized study

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of minocycline-rifampin-coated hemodialysis catheters in reducing catheter-related infections in patients requiring hemodialysis for acute renal failure. METHODS: Between May 2000 and March 2002, 66 patients were randomly assigned to receive a minocycline-rifampin-impregnated central venous catheter and 64 were randomly assigned to receive an unimpregnated catheter. Patients were followed prospectively until the catheter was removed. Catheter-related infection was determined through quantitative catheter cultures, quantitative blood cultures, or both. RESULTS: Both groups of patients were similar in age, sex, underlying disease, type of dialysis (continuous vs. intermittent), neutropenia during catheterization and its duration, catheter insertion difficulties, and administration of blood products or medication. The mean (+/- SD) catheter dwell time was the same in both groups (8 +/- 6 days, P = 0.7). There were seven catheter-related infections (11%), all associated with the use of unimpregnated catheters. Kaplan-Meier estimates for the risk of catheter-related infection showed that coated catheters were less likely to be associated with infection (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The use of polyurethane hemodialysis catheters impregnated with minocycline and rifampin decreases the risk of catheter-related infection in patients with acute renal failure.     

Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections

BACKGROUND: Although many catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSIs) are preventable, measures to reduce these infections are not uniformly implemented. OBJECTIVE: To update an existing evidenced-based guideline that promotes strategies to prevent CR-BSIs.Data Sources: The MEDLINE database, conference proceedings, and bibliographies of review articles and book chapters were searched for relevant articles.Studies Included: Laboratory-based studies, controlled clinical trials, prospective interventional trials, and epidemiological investigations.Outcome Measures: Reduction in CR-BSI, catheter colonization, or catheter-related infection. SYNTHESIS: The recommended preventive strategies with the strongest supportive evidence are education and training of healthcare providers who insert and maintain catheters; maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; use of a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; no routine replacement of central venous catheters for prevention of infection; and use of antiseptic/antibiotic impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies (i.e. education and training, maximal sterile barrier precautions and 2% chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis). CONCLUSION: Successful implementation of these evidence-based interventions can reduce the risk for serious catheter-related infection.     

Risk of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection in Elderly Patients on Hemodialysis

Background and objectives

Elderly patients require tunneled central vein dialysis catheters more often than younger patients. Little is known about the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection in this population.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

This study identified 464 patients on hemodialysis with tunneled central vein dialysis catheters between 2005 and 2007 and excluded patients who accrued <21 catheter-days during this period. Outpatient and inpatient catheter-related bloodstream infection data were collected. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis adjusting for sex, ancestry, comorbidites, dialysis vintage, dialysis unit, immunosuppression, initial catheter site, and first antimicrobial catheter lock solution was performed for risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection between nonelderly (18–74 years) and elderly (≥75 years) patients.

Results

In total, 374 nonelderly and 90 elderly patients with mean (SD) ages of 54.8 (12.3) and 81.3 (4.9) years and dialysis vintages of 1.8 (3.3) and 1.5 (2.9) years (P=0.47), respectively, were identified. Mean at-risk catheter-days were 272 (243) in nonelderly and 318 (240) in elderly patients. Between age groups, there were no significant differences in initial catheter site, type of catheter lock solution, or microbiology results. A total of 208 catheter-related bloodstream infection events occurred (190 events in nonelderly and 18 events in elderly patients), with a catheter-related bloodstream infection incidence per 1000 catheter-days of 1.97 (4.6) in nonelderly and 0.55 (1.6) in elderly patients (P<0.001). Relative to nonelderly patients, the hazard ratio for catheter-related bloodstream infection in the elderly was 0.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.55; P<0.001) after multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Elderly patients on hemodialysis using tunneled central vein dialysis catheters are at lower risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection than their younger counterparts. For some elderly patients, tunneled central vein dialysis catheters may represent a suitable dialysis access option in the setting of nonmaturing arteriovenous fistulae or poorly functioning synthetic grafts.     

Reduction of central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in a neonatal intensive care unit after implementation of a multidisciplinary evidence-based quality improvement collaborative: A four-year surveillance

BACKGROUND:

The use of central venous catheters has permitted lifesaving treatment for critically ill neonates; however, the attributable mortality rate for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) has been estimated to be between 4% and 20%. In 2006/2007, the authors’ neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) had a CLABSI rate that was nearly twofold higher than that reported by other Canadian NICUs.

OBJECTIVE:

To implement a quality improvement collaborative to reduce the incidence of neonatal CLABSI.

METHODS:

A retrospective observational study was performed to compare CLABSI in neonates admitted to the authors’ level III NICU between August 2007 and March 2011. The entire study period was divided into four time periods to evaluate secular trends. A comprehensive catheter-related bloodstream infection prevention initiative was implemented in August 2007. The initiatives included staff education, standardization of skin preparation protocol, introduction of new antiseptic agents, implementation of central catheter insertion and maintenance checklists, reinforcement of the use of maximal sterile barrier precautions, and revision of the central catheter configuration and maintenance protocols.

RESULTS:

The median CLABSI rate of 7.9 per 1000 catheter days at the beginning of the study (period 1 [August 2007 to June 2008]) gradually decreased over the entire study period (P=0.034): period 2 (July 2008 to May 2009), 3.3 per 1000 catheter days; period 3 (June 2009 to April 2010), 2.6 per 1000 catheter days; and period 4 (May 2010 to March 2011), 2.2 per 1000 catheter days.

CONCLUSION:

A multidisciplinary evidence-based quality improvement collaborative resulted in a significant reduction in the CLABSI rate. Continuous quality improvement measures are required to reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections among low-birth-weight infants.     

Ultrasound screening for internal jugular vein thrombosis aids the detection of central venous catheter-related infections in patients with haemato-oncological diseases: a prospective observational study

To prove the hypothesis that central venous catheter-related thrombosis and infection are associated, 43 haemato-oncological patients with an internal jugular vein catheter underwent ultrasound screening for thrombosis every 4 d. Catheter-related thrombosis was detected in 13/43 patients (30%). Catheter-related infection, as defined by the U.S. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, was found in 14/43 patients (33%) with colonization of the catheter in two patients, exit site infection in eight patients and catheter-related bloodstream infection in four patients. Catheter-related thrombosis and catheter-related infection coincided in 12 patients and were significantly correlated (Fisher's exact test, P < 0.0001). Detection of thrombosis indicated a catheter-related infection with a superior sensitivity (86% vs 57%) and an equivalent specificity (97%) compared with the presence of clinical signs (erythema, tenderness, warmth or swelling). Neutropenia, which occurred in 32 patients, was found in 13/14 patients (93%) with a catheter-related infection and, therefore, seemed to be an important covariate for the development of a catheter-related infection. This study showed a close correlation between catheter-related thrombosis and infection. Ultrasound screening for thrombosis was helpful for detecting catheter-related infection. These findings could be clinically useful for the handling of central venous catheters in patients with an elevated risk of infectious complications.     

Single- versus triple-lumen central catheter-related sepsis: a prospective randomized study in a critically ill population.

PURPOSE: A prospective randomized study was conducted over a 23-month period in an adult medical-surgical intensive care unit to determine whether triple-lumen catheters reduce the need for peripheral vascular access and whether they are associated with a higher rate of infection than single-lumen catheters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After the insertion route, internal jugular or subclavian, was selected by the physician, patients were randomized either to single-lumen or triple-lumen catheter groups. Complementary peripheral vascular access was allowed in both groups. Catheters were removed according to preestablished defined reasons: suspicion of catheter-related sepsis, uselessness of central venous access, duration of catheterization of more than 21 days, discharge from the intensive care unit, or death. RESULTS: Data on 129 central venous catheters were collected from 91 consecutive patients. Twenty-five of 68 patients from the single-lumen group and 1 of 61 patients from the triple-lumen group needed peripheral vascular access (p less than 0.001). Catheter-related sepsis rates, defined either by clinical signs and positive qualitative tip cultures (8.9% versus 11.5%) or by quantitative tip cultures (16.2% versus 11.5%), were identical in the single-lumen and triple-lumen groups (type II error: 8%). CONCLUSION: In intensive care units, the use of triple-lumen catheters is associated with a dramatic decrease in the need for peripheral vascular access. The incidence of central venous catheter-related sepsis appears identical for single- and triple-lumen catheters.     

Prospective evaluation of risk factors for bloodstream infection in patients receiving home infusion therapy.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous therapy in the outpatient and home settings is commonplace for many diseases and nutritional disorders. Few data are available on the rate of and risk factors for bloodstream infection among patients receiving such therapy. OBJECTIVE: To determine rates of and risk factors for bloodstream infection among patients receiving home infusion therapy. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: Cleveland, Ohio, and Toronto, Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS: Patients receiving home infusion therapy through a central or midline catheter. MEASUREMENTS: Primary laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection. RESULTS: Among 827 patients (988 catheters), the most common diagnoses were infections other than HIV (67%), cancer (24%), nutritional and digestive disease (17%), heart disease (14%), receipt of bone marrow or solid organ transplants (11%), and HIV infection (7%). Sixty-nine bloodstream infections occurred during 69,532 catheter-days (0.99 infections per 1000 days). In a Cox regression model with time-dependent covariates, independent risk factors for bloodstream infection were recent receipt of a bone marrow transplant (hazard ratio, 5.8 [95% CI, 3.0 to 11.3]), receipt of total parenteral nutrition (hazard ratio, 4.1 [CI, 2.3 to 7.2]), receipt of therapy outside the home (for example, in an outpatient clinic or physician's office) (hazard ratio, 3.6 [CI, 2.2 to 5.9]), use of a multilumen catheter (hazard ratio, 2.8 [CI, 1.7 to 4.7]), and previous bloodstream infection (hazard ratio, 2.5 [CI, 1.5 to 4.2]). Rates of bloodstream infection per 1000 catheter-days varied from 0.16 for patients with none of these 5 risk factors to 6.77 for patients with 3 or more risk factors. Centrally inserted venous catheters were associated with a higher risk than implanted ports were, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Bloodstream infections seem to be infrequent among outpatients receiving infusions through central and midline catheters. However, the rate of infection increases with bone marrow transplantation, parenteral nutrition, infusion therapy in a hospital clinic or physician's office, and use of multilumen catheters. Compared with implanted ports or peripherally inserted catheters, centrally inserted venous catheters may confer greater risk for bloodstream infection.     

Decreasing catheter colonization through the use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter: a continuous quality improvement project.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of an antiseptic-impregnated (chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine) catheter for the prevention of catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI). Then, based on these findings, to implement changes in hospital policy and to assess their effect on a hospital service. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled (phase I); prospective, concurrent data collection (phase II). SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital with level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Patients > 12 years of age with central venous catheters placed while they were in the emergency room, neurotrauma ICU, or medical/surgical ICU from May through December, 1995 (phase I). All patients > 12 years of age on the trauma service admitted from November 16, 1996, through November 15, 1997 (phase II). INTERVENTIONS: Randomization table determined whether the patient would receive an antiseptic-impregnated catheter (AIC) or nonimpregnated catheter (NIC) (phase I). All removed or exchanged catheters were sent for semiquantitative culture. In phase II, only AICs were used; "length of time" and "fever" were discouraged as reasons for catheter exchange or removal; and only the tip was sent for culture. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: In phase I, there were 139 catheters placed in 60 patients in the NIC group and 98 catheters placed in 55 patients in the AIC group. Two catheters (2.0/100 catheters) in the AIC group were found to be colonized, compared with 25 (18.0/100 catheters) in the NIC group (p = 0.001). The catheter colonization rates were 2.27/1,000 catheter days (AIC) and 24.68/1,000 catheter days (NIC) (p < 0.001), while the CR-BSI rates were 1.14/1,000 catheter days (AIC) and 3.9.5/1,000 catheter days (NIC) (p = 0.31). The reason for each catheter removal/exchange was noted, and only "positive blood culture" was statistically significant overall. The tip segment was found to be positive more often than the intracutaneous segment. In phase II, there were 213 AICs placed in 101 patients. The colonization rate was 3.8/100 catheters (4.52/1,000 catheter days), and CR-BSI rate was 1.0/100 catheters (0.6/1,000 catheter days). The colonization rate for catheters left in place remained low for catheters left in place < 14 days (1.6/100 catheters). Only 11% of catheters were exchanged/removed for reason of "fever," as compared with 23% in phase I. CONCLUSIONS: AICs significantly reduce the rate of central venous catheter colonization. In addition, the apparent protective effects of the catheter over time permit less frequent exchanges or removals of the catheters, decreasing both patient risk and hospital cost.     

Prevention of infections associated with vascular catheters

Summary Catheter-related bloodstream infection is the most common life threatening complication of intravascular catheters. Most cases of catheter-related infection are caused by skin organisms that originate either from the skin of the patient and migrate along the external surface of the catheter or from the skin of the medical personnel causing hub contamination and subsequent bacterial migration along the internal surface of the catheter. A number of measures have been reported in clinical trials to protect against vascular catheter-related infection. Preventive measures that utilize antimicrobial agents include application of topical disinfectants, flushing catheters with the combination of antimicrobial and antithrombotic agents, use of silver-impregnated subcutaneous cuffs for short-term central venous catheters, antimicrobial coating of catheters either with antiseptics or with antibiotics, and use of an antiseptic catheter hub. Protective measures that do not utilize antimicrobial agents include placement and maintenance of vascular catheters by a skilled infusion therapy team and institution of maximal sterile barriers. Received: 16 November 1998 Akzeptiert: 8 December 1998     

重症监护室老年患者中心静脉导管相关血流感染的危险因素

目的探讨重症监护室（ICU）老年患者导管相关血流感染（CRBSI）的危险因素。方法ICU90例老年住院患者接受中心静脉置管,分为导管相关性血流感染（CRBSI）组和无感染（对照）组。CRBSI组患者为ICU住院的行深静脉置管伴CRBSI的病例（n=45）,而对照组为同期ICU住院的行深静脉置管但无CRBSI的病例（17=45）,采用回顾性和病例对照的研究方法,对两组患者进行风险困素分析。结果两组患者基础疾病构成、年龄、性别、感染前导管留鼍时间、机械通气、完全肠外营养、尿管留置等的差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。与对照组比较,CRBSI组使用碳青霉烯类抗生素、操作熟练程度、置管部位、低白蛋白血症、贫血、APACHEII评分差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01、P〈0．05）。使用碳青霉烯类抗生素、操作者、低A蛋白血症、APACHEII评分是CRBSI独立危险因素。结论碳青霉烯类抗生素使用、操作者人员熟练程度、低白蛋A血症及APACHEII评分是ICU老年患者CRBSI的独立危险因素。     

Difference in time to positivity is useful for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Catheter-related bloodstream infections are associated with recognized morbidity and mortality. Accurate diagnosis of such infections results in proper management of patients and in reducing unnecessary removal of catheters. We carried out a prospective study in a bone marrow transplant unit to assess the validity of a test based on the earlier positivity of central venous blood cultures in comparison with peripheral blood cultures for predicting catheter-related bacteremia. Between May 2002 and June 2004, 38 bloodstream infections with positive simultaneous central venous catheter and peripheral vein blood cultures were included. A total of 22 patients had catheter-related bacteremias and 16 had noncatheter-related bacteremias, using the catheter-tip culture/clinical criteria as the criterion standard to define catheter-related bacteremia. Differential time to positivity of 120 min or more was associated with 86% sensitivity and 87% specificity. In conclusion, differential time to positivity of 120 min or more is sensitive and specific for catheter-related bacteremia in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients who have nontunnelled short-term catheters.     

Chlorhexidine-based antiseptic solution vs alcohol-based povidone-iodine for central venous catheter care

BACKGROUND: Although chlorhexidine-based solutions and alcohol-based povidone-iodine have been shown to be more efficient than aqueous povidone-iodine for skin disinfection at catheter insertion sites, their abilities to reduce catheter-related infection have never been compared. METHODS: Consecutively scheduled central venous catheters inserted into jugular or subclavian veins were randomly assigned to be disinfected with 5% povidone-iodine in 70% ethanol or with a combination of 0.25% chlorhexidine gluconate, 0.025% benzalkonium chloride, and 4% benzylic alcohol. Solutions were used for skin disinfection before catheter insertion (2 consecutive 30-second applications separated by a period sufficiently long to allow for dryness) and then as single applications during subsequent dressing changes (every 72 hours, or earlier if soiled or wet). RESULTS: Of 538 catheters randomized, 481 (89.4%) produced evaluable culture results. Compared with povidone-iodine, the chlorhexidine-based solution was associated with a 50% decrease in the incidence of catheter colonization (11.6% vs 22.2% [P = .002]; incidence density, 9.7 vs 18.3 per 1000 catheter-days) and with a trend toward lower rates of catheter-related bloodstream infection (1.7% vs 4.2% [P = .09]; incidence density, 1.4 vs 3.4 per 1000 catheter-days). Independent risk factors for catheter colonization were catheter insertion into the jugular vein (adjusted relative risk, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-3.24) and use of povidone-iodine (adjusted relative risk, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.96). CONCLUSION: Chlorhexidine-based solutions should be considered as a replacement for povidone-iodine (including alcohol-based) formulations in efforts to prevent catheter-related infection.