The expression of an alcohol deprivation effect in the high-alcohol-drinking replicate rat lines is dependent on repeated deprivations

BACKGROUND: The alcohol deprivation effect (ADE) is a temporary increase in the ratio of alcohol/total fluid intake and voluntary intake of ethanol (EtOH) solutions over baseline drinking conditions when EtOH access is reinstated after a period of alcohol deprivation. The ADE has been posited to be an animal model for alcohol craving. In the current study, we examined the effects of initial deprivation length and number of deprivation exposures on the ADE in the replicate lines of the high-alcohol-drinking (HAD) rats. METHODS: Adult male HAD-1 and HAD-2 rats received 24 hr free-choice access to 10% (v/v) EtOH and water for 6 weeks. Rats were then assigned to groups deprived of EtOH for 0 (control), or 2 to 8 weeks. All deprived groups were then given 24 hr access to EtOH for 2 weeks before being deprived of EtOH for another 2 weeks. This cycle of 2 weeks of access and 2 weeks of deprivation was carried out for a total of four deprivations. RESULTS: After the initial EtOH deprivation period, EtOH consumption in HAD-1 and HAD-2 rats returned to baseline levels but failed to exhibit either an early onset ADE (initial 2 hr) or prolonged ADE (24 hr). An ADE was observed in two of the four deprived groups for the HAD-1 rats (2 week and 6 week groups) and in all deprived groups for the HAD-2 rats after a second deprivation, and in all deprived groups of both lines after a third deprivation. In the HAD-2 line, but not in the HAD-1 line, the duration of the ADE was prolonged into the second reinstatement day after the fourth deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: The expression of an ADE was observed only after repeated deprivation periods in the HAD lines. The duration of the ADE was prolonged in the HAD-2 line, but not in the HAD-1 line, with repeated deprivations, which suggests a dissociation between selection for alcohol preference and the effects of repeated deprivations on the duration of the ADE.     

Voluntary ethanol drinking during the first three postnatal weeks in lines of rats selectively bred for divergent ethanol preference

BACKGROUND: Using a procedure first developed by Hall (1979), we examined ethanol self-administration in preweanling pups from Wistar rats and in lines of rats selectively bred for divergent ethanol preference (alcohol-preferring P, alcohol-nonpreferring NP, high-alcohol-drinking HAD-1 and -2, and low-alcohol-drinking LAD-2) to determine if factors contributing to high and low alcohol intakes are present early in development. METHODS: From postnatal days 5 to 20, nondeprived male and female rat pups received 30 min daily access to either water or a 15% (v/v) ethanol solution. In each daily session, pups were placed in a heated chamber containing Kimwipes soaked with a water or ethanol solution. Pups were weighed before and after each session, and intake levels were calculated as a percentage of body weight change. RESULTS: Similar to previous reports, Wistar pups exhibited over a 2-fold higher level of ethanol ingestion than water on postnatal days 9 through 14, with ethanol intakes approaching 3 g/kg body weight. When the drinking patterns of the selected lines were examined, only the HAD replicate lines showed a comparable preference for ethanol versus water during the preweanling period. The ethanol consumption of P, NP, and LAD lines was not consistently distinguishable from water intake levels. To reveal whether early ethanol exposure would influence later ethanol drinking behavior, a subset of HAD and LAD rat pups received free-choice ethanol access upon weaning. Although the divergent ethanol preference between high- and low-alcohol-drinking lines was evident within the first 4 days of access (>4 g/kg/day for HAD; <2 g/kg/day for LAD), preweanling ethanol exposure did not alter the acquisition or maintenance of ethanol drinking in either line. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these results suggest that (a) the enhanced ethanol ingestion observed during the middle portion of the preweanling period is a robust phenomenon and generalizes across nonselected strains of rats, (b) selective breeding for divergent alcohol preference has arrested this age-specific effect in all but the HAD lines of rats, and (c) early ethanol exposure does not alter genetic dispositions for later high or low alcohol preference.     

A comparative study on alcohol-preferring rat lines: effects of deprivation and stress phases on voluntary alcohol intake

BACKGROUND: Voluntary alcohol intake in rats can be influenced by alcohol deprivation phases and stress. We investigated the magnitude of the effects of both deprivation and stress (forced swimming in cold water and foot-shock had been chosen as stressors distinct in their physical and psychological features) on alcohol intake and the influence of these experiences on the time course of alcohol drinking behavior. For the alcohol drinking procedure, a long-term model of alcohol self-administration originally developed for heterogeneous Wistar rats was used and was compared with different alcohol-preferring rat lines. METHODS: Adult male Alko alcohol (AA), alcohol-preferring (P), high-alcohol-drinking (HAD), and unselected Wistar rats were given ad libitum access to water, 5%, and 20% alcohol solutions for 6 months. A deprivation phase of 14 days was performed after 8 weeks of access to alcohol. After 16 weeks and 22 weeks of alcohol access, all animals were subjected to forced swimming and foot-shock, respectively, for 3 consecutive days, while alcohol intake was still being measured. RESULTS: Alcohol deprivation led to a significant increase in alcohol intake in Wistar rats and P rats. No alcohol deprivation effect was observed in HAD and AA rats; after deprivation, however, their preference for the 20% alcohol solution increased, immediately in the HAD rats and gradually over time in the AA rats. Repeated swim stress caused an increase in alcohol intake in Wistar rats but no changes in the alcohol-preferring rat lines. Foot-shock stress increased alcohol consumption in all lines of rats, but the most pronounced effects were observed in HAD and P rats. CONCLUSIONS: Wistar, HAD, P, and AA rats differentially respond to alcohol deprivation and stress, showing that the genetic background of these different rat lines profoundly affects relapse-like drinking and stress-induced drinking.     

Increase of Rat Alcohol Drinking Behavior Depends on the Age of Drinking Onset

Background Although alcohol drinking onset in younger people is associated with an increased risk of alcohol-related injuries, other factors, such as habituation and susceptibility to alcohol, in the process of aging have not been adequately examined in animal models. In the present study, we determined whether age of drinking onset affected alcohol drinking behavior and led to alcohol tolerance in experimental animals, and extrapolated some of the findings to human alcohol drinking patterns.
Methods In the first experiment, 18 rats that were naive to alcohol were tested at the age of 1, 4, and 10 months with 4 hr of access to 10% (v/v) alcohol. After the time access tests, these animals (1, 4, and 10 months of age) were housed individually and given free access to 10% alcohol solution and tap water. At 3 and 6 months later, all rats that had experienced alcohol drinking were studied for the voluntary consumption of the alcohol solution, alcohol preference, under the two-bottle method in a second experiment.
Results In the 4-hr alcohol-access test, alcohol intake (g/kg/hr) was significantly increased at 0.5 and 1 hr in 1- and 4-month-old naive rats compared with 10-month-old naive rats. The daily alcohol intake (g/kg/day) of rats with drinking onset at 1 month of age was significantly increased at 3 and 6 months after the voluntary alcohol consumption. The daily alcohol intake in the rats with drinking onset at 4 months of age was significantly increased at 6 months only. However, the daily alcohol intake did not change in the rats with drinking onset at 10 months of age through the alcohol preference test.
Conclusions Alcohol drinking behavior in experimental animals depends on the age of alcohol drinking onset.     

Conditioned Taste Aversions Induced by Alcohol and Lithium in Rats Selectively Bred for Ethanol Neurosensitivity

Rats that were selectively bred for differences in alcohol-induced sleep time (alcohol neurosensitivity) were tested for differences in formation and extinction of alcohol- and LiCl-induced conditioned taste aversions. Male rats bred for high, control, or low alcohol sensitivity (HAS, CAS, and LAS rats, respectively) were deprived of water and given daily 30 min access to water for a baseline period of 7 days. Rats were then given a novel 0.125% sodium saccharin solution, followed by an intraperitoneal injection of either saline, 2 g/kg of ethanol (at 10% w/v), or 50.9 mg/kg of LiCl(0.15 M) on 3 conditioning days. Each saccharin exposure was followed by a recovery day of BCCBSS to water. The ethanol-induced saccharin aversion extinguished more rapidly in LAS rats than in CAS or HAS rats ( p < 0.05), but LiCl conditioned equivalent aversions in each group. Also, ethanol injection results in large differences in observed resting behavior in these rats (HAS > CAS > LAS), but LiCl injection produced no reliable group differences in resting. The weaker alcohol-Induced M e aversion in LAS rats accords with their previously measured higher oral consumption of alcohol (Kulkosky et al., Alcoholism 17: M-651, 1993) and the idea that alcohol intake is limited by an expectancy of postingestive consequences. The weaker ethanol induced aversion in LAS rats reflects selective breeding of an alcohol-specific trait and not a general difference In aversive conditioning or chemical neurosensitivity.     

Increase in Alcohol Intake,Reduced Flexibility of Alcohol Drinking,and Evidence of Signs of Alcohol Intoxication in Sardinian Alcohol‐Preferring Rats Exposed to Intermittent Access to 20% Alcohol

Background: This study assessed in Sardinian alcohol‐preferring (sP) rats a procedure known to promote alcohol drinking and based on the intermittent (once every other day) access to 2 bottles containing alcohol (20%, v/v) and water, respectively (Wise, 1973). Methods: To this end, sP rats were exposed – under the 2‐bottle choice regimen – to: (i) 10% (v/v) alcohol with continuous access (CA10%; i.e., the procedure under which sP rats had been selectively bred); (ii) 10% (v/v) alcohol with intermittent access (IA10%); (iii) 20% (v/v) alcohol with continuous access (CA20%); (iv) 20% (v/v) alcohol with intermittent access (IA20%; the “Wise” condition) (Experiment 1). Additional experiments assessed the influence of (i) adulteration with quinine of the alcohol solution (Experiment 2) and (ii) concurrent presentation of a saccharin solution (Experiment 3) on alcohol drinking under the CA10% and IA20% conditions. Finally, it was assessed whether alcohol drinking under the CA10% and IA20% conditions resulted in motor incoordination at the Rota‐Rod task, as a possible sign of alcohol intoxication (Experiment 4). Results: Daily alcohol intake markedly escalated in rats exposed to the IA20% condition, averaging 9.0 g/kg (in comparison with the average intake of 6.5 g/kg in the CA10% rat group). CA20% and IA10% rats displayed intermediate values of daily alcohol intake between those of CA10% and IA20% rats. Alcohol intake was virtually abolished by addition of quinine or by concurrent presentation of the saccharin solution in CA10% rats; conversely, alcohol intake in IA20% rats was only partially affected by gustatory aversion or concurrent presentation of an alternative reinforcer. Finally, alcohol intake in IA20%, but not in CA10%, rats resulted in clear motor‐incoordinating effects. Conclusions: These data suggest that the “Wise” procedure is effective in inducing marked increases in alcohol intake in sP rats. These increases are associated with a reduced flexibility of alcohol drinking (suggesting the development of “behavioral” dependence) and produce signs of alcohol intoxication that are not detected when sP rats are exposed to the more conventional CA10% condition.     

Effects of long-term episodic access to ethanol on the expression of an alcohol deprivation effect in low alcohol-consuming rats

Background: The alcohol‐preferring (P) and ‐nonpreferring (NP) and high alcohol–drinking (HAD) and low alcohol–drinking (LAD) rats have been selectively bred for divergent preference for ethanol over water. In addition, both P and HAD rats display an alcohol deprivation effect (ADE). This study was undertaken to test whether the NP, LAD‐1, and LAD‐2 lines of rats could display an ADE as well. Method: Adult female NP, LAD‐1, and LAD‐2 rats were given concurrent access to multiple concentrations of ethanol [5, 10, 15% (v/v)] and water in an ADE paradigm involving an initial 6 weeks of 24‐hr access to ethanol, followed by four cycles of 2 weeks of deprivation from and 2 weeks of re‐exposure to ethanol (5, 10, and 15%). A control group had continuous access to the ethanol concentrations (5, 10, and 15%) and water through the end of the fourth re‐exposure period. Results: For NP rats, a preference for the highest ethanol concentration (15%) was evident by the end of the fifth week of access (～60% of total ethanol fluid intake). Contrarily, LAD rats did not display a marked preference for any one concentration of ethanol. All three lines displayed an ADE after repeated cycles of re‐exposure to ethanol, with the general ranking of intake being LAD‐1 > NP > LAD‐2 (e.g., for the first day of reinstatement of the third re‐exposure cycle, intakes were 6.5, 2.9, and 2.4 g/kg/day compared with baseline values of 3.1, 2.0, and 1.3 g/kg/day for each line, respectively). By the 13th week, rats from all three lines, with a ranking of LAD‐1 > NP > LAD‐2, were drinking more ethanol (3.3, 2.2, and 2.0 g/kg/day, respectively) compared with their consumption during the first week of access (～1.1 g/kg/day for all three lines). Conclusion: These data indicate that access to multiple concentrations of ethanol and exposure to multiple deprivation cycles can partially overcome a genetic predisposition of NP, LAD‐1, and LAD‐2 rats for low alcohol consumption. In addition, the findings suggest that genetic control of low alcohol consumption in rats is not associated with the inability to display an ADE.     

Additive Reduction of Alcohol Drinking by 5-HT1A Antagonist WAY 100635 and Serotonin Uptake Blocker Fluoxetine in Alcohol-Preferring P Rats

We found previously that alcohol-preferring (P) rats have fewer serotonin (5-HT) neurons and fibers in key brain regions than alcoholnonpreferring (NP) rats. Because 5-HT uptake blockers increase synaptic 5-HT content and 5-HT_1A receptor antagonists increase 5-HT release by disinhibiting 5-HT autoinnervation, in the present study, our intent was to determine whether increased synaptic 5-HT content and/or 5-HT release in P rats would effectively reduce alcohol consumption. In experiment 1, the 5-HT antagonist WAY 100635 (WAY) was tested on adult female P rats maintained on 24-hr free-choice access to ethanol (10% v/v) and water. Twice daily doses of WAY (0.05, 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg, subcutaneously) were administered to each rat in a counterbalanced order. Baseline ethanol intake, derived from the mean ethanol intakes of the three previous non-drug days, was approximately 8 g/kg/day. Results indicated that 0.05,0.1, and 0.5 mg/kg doses of WAY reduced 24-hr ethanol drinking by 25-30% ( p < 0.01) without affecting 24-hr water intake or body weight In the second experiment, the effects of WAY (0.5 mg/kg), fluoxetine (1.0 mg/kg), or a combination of both were tested in another group of female P rats. WAY and fluoxetine, each alone, reduced ethanol drinking by around 20% and, when combined, decreased ethanol intake by 50%, whereas the body weight and the total fluid intake were not significantly affected. Taken together, these results indicate that both fluoxetine and WAY preferentially reduce ethanol drinking in the P line of rats and, when administered together, reduce ethanol intake in an additive manner. It is proposed that coadministration of these two compounds with distinct mechanisms of action may be a new strategy for reducing alcohol intake.     

Differential responding for brain stimulation reward and sucrose in high-alcohol-drinking (HAD) and low-alcohol-drinking (LAD) rats

BACKGROUND: This study examined the associations among selective breeding for alcohol preference, intake of sweet solutions, and responding for brain stimulation reward (BSR), a nonoral reinforcer, in alcohol-preferring high-alcohol-drinking (HAD)-1 and nonpreferring low-alcohol-drinking (LAD)-1 rats. METHODS: Adult male HAD-1 and LAD-1 rats were trained to lever press for medial forebrain bundle stimulation. Current intensity was varied in separate sessions to generate a rate/intensity function. To further examine BSR responding, the animals responded for stimulation at 100 Hz and at a fixed current intensity on an FR1 schedule. In subsequent sessions, the schedule was increased to FR6 and then to FR12. To examine responding for the sucrose solution, we trained a separate group of HAD-1/LAD-1 rats to bar press for sucrose on an FR1 schedule. Similar to the BSR experiment, in following sessions, the schedule was increased to an FR6 and then to an FR12 schedule. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the two rat lines across a range of current intensities. As the reinforcement schedule increased, HAD-1 rats exhibited a dramatic decrease in BSR responding, whereas the LAD-1 rats displayed a more protracted reduction. In contrast to BSR, marked elevations in responding were observed for sucrose as the schedule increased. However, in HAD-1 rats, response rates were similar on the FR6 and FR12 schedules, whereas LAD-1 rats showed a reduction in response rates from the FR6 to FR12 schedule. Furthermore, HAD-1 rats exhibited significantly more responses compared with LAD-1 rats across the three reinforcement schedules. An analysis of the response profile for the three reinforcement schedules suggested that few if any postreinforcement pauses were exhibited when the reinforcer was BSR compared with sucrose in both lines. CONCLUSION: Medial forebrain bundle BSR is a powerful reinforcer in both HAD-1 and LAD-1 lines. However, BSR responding was not associated with selective breeding for alcohol preference. In contrast, selective breeding for alcohol preference was associated with sucrose consumption, especially as the amount of work increased. The lack of correspondence between BSR and sweet taste rewards in HAD-1 and LAD-1 lines may suggest important differences yet an overlapping brain reward mechanism in the control of motivated behaviors in these selected lines.     

Effect of Calcitonin on the Alcohol Drinking of Rats

Previous work has shown that calcitonin inhibits eating by rats and that it affects several neurotransmitter systems suspected to play a role in alcohol consumption. The present study was an initial test of whether calcitonin does affect voluntary alcohol consumption by male Wistar rats with prolonged alcohol experience. Calcitonin (20 IU/kg) or saline was injected subcutaneously on 10 consecutive days when the rats (n = 20) had continual access to 10% (v/v) ethanol solution, and to food and water. Using a cross-over design, the effects of 40 IU/kg calcitonin vs. saline were then examined in a second 10-day treatment period. Similar patterns of effects were obtained with both calcitonin doses, but the patterns differed with alcohol, food, and water intake. Alcohol drinking showed biphasic changes with both doses, producing highly significant Treatment x Day interactions (p < 1E-10 and p = 6E-7): it was significantly reduced on the first day of calcitonin treatment and significantly increased on the last few days. Food intake was reduced on all calcitonin days although most markedly on the first. Water drinking was not altered on the first calcitonin day, but was greatly increased on the second, then gradually returned toward the baseline. In a second experiment, the animals were switched to 1 hr of alcohol access per day, and calcitonin (20 IU/kg) was administered periodically to one group 4 hr before the alcohol access. Alcohol drinking was significantly reduced in all cases when the calcitonin injection was preceded by at least 1 day without calcitonin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Enhanced morphine-induced ethanol drinking in alcohol-preferring alko alcohol rats sensitized to morphine

BACKGROUND: Alcohol-preferring alko alcohol (AA) rats are more susceptible to morphine-induced behavioral and neurochemical sensitization than alcohol nonpreferring alko nonalcohol (ANA) rats. Alko alcohol rats sensitized to morphine, however, do not show enhanced acquisition of ethanol drinking. The purpose of the present study was to clarify further interactions between morphine-induced behavioral sensitization and voluntary ethanol drinking in the AA rats. METHODS: Alko alcohol rats drinking ethanol in a limited 6-hour access paradigm were sensitized to morphine with repeated injections of morphine (5-15 mg/kg). Injection days alternated with days of ethanol access. Controls had access only to water and/or were given injections of saline. After a 5-day washout period from ethanol and morphine, the rats were challenged with morphine or saline and subsequent ethanol drinking or locomotor activity was recorded. RESULTS: Ethanol intake was suppressed during the repeated treatment with morphine, and the morphine-treated rats did not differ in ethanol intake from the controls when given access to ethanol after the washout. Intake of ethanol was, however, increased when the rats were challenged with morphine [1 or 10 mg/kg, subcutaneously (s.c.)], while in the controls an increase in ethanol intake was seen only after 1 mg/kg morphine. Sensitization to the locomotor stimulating effects of morphine was revealed in the morphine-treated rats after a challenge with morphine (3 or 10 mg/kg, s.c.). The controls that had been drinking ethanol also showed a sensitized response after morphine (3 mg/kg). CONCLUSIONS: Ethanol did not interfere with the development of sensitization to morphine. Furthermore, the neuroadaptations induced by repeated exposure to ethanol were sufficient to cause behavioral cross-sensitization to morphine. Sensitization to the behavioral effects of morphine alone, however, neither enhances the reinforcing properties of voluntarily consumed ethanol nor contributes to increase in its intake. The increase in ethanol intake found after an acute dose of morphine was augmented in rats withdrawn from repeated treatment with morphine. The data suggest that the neuronal mechanisms underlying behavioral sensitization to morphine probably are distinct from those mediating reinforcement from ethanol and that the morphine-induced neuroadaptations contribute to the enhancement of increase in ethanol intake by morphine.     

Taste Reactivity in High Alcohol Drinking and Low Alcohol Drinking Rats

High alcohol drinking (HAD) and low alcohol drinking (LAD) rats were tested, in three exposures, for taste reactivity to five concentrations of alcohol (5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%, v/v), water, and one concentration each of sucrose and quinine. Of the three reactivity exposures, one was done before a 3-week period of continuous access to water and 10% alcohol, the second test was done immediately after the consumption period, and the final reactivity test was done after 1 month of alcohol abstinence. The results showed that the groups did not differ in reactivity on the initial test. After the consumption tests (when the HAD rats consumed significantly more alcohol than the LAD rats), differences in reactivity were found: HAD rats produced significantly more ingestive responses (which promote consumption) and significantly fewer aversive responses (which facilitate fluid rejection) than LAD rats. These differences were maintained even after 1 month of alcohol abstinence. The present data replicate an earlier experiment with alcohol-preferring (P) rats and alcohol-non-preferring (NP) rats, and indicate that the selective breeding process does not produce differences in the innate perception of the taste of alcohol. However, after experience with drinking alcohol, rats selectively bred for high alcohol consumption exhibit a palatability shift reflected by high ingestive responding and little or no aversive responding. Such a shift would clearly contribute to the maintenance of high levels of alcohol consumption.     

Development of Alcohol Drinking Behavior in Rat Lines Selectively Bred for Divergent Alcohol Preference

A characteristic of heritable alcoholism is an early onset of alcohol abuse, which may begin at or before the age of adolescence. The objective of the present study was to determine the ontogeny of alcohol drinking behavior before and during puberty in the selectively bred alcohol-preferring (P), alcohol-nonpreferring (NP), high alcohol drinking (HAD), and low alcohol drinking (LAD) lines of rats. In addition, the effects of postweaning housing conditions (single- or pair-housed) and initiation procedure (4 days forced ethanol or free-choice) were evaluated in male and female P rats. Results indicate that high alcohol drinking in P and HAD (replicate line 2) rats, as well as low alcohol drinking behavior in NP and LAD (replicate line 2) rats, is present as early as 3 to 4 weeks of age. Ethanol intakes in juvenile P and HAD rats reached levels of ∼4 to 5 g/kg/day by 38 to 41 days of age and were comparable with levels observed in adults. Neither housing conditions nor ethanol initiation procedure significantly altered the acquisition or magnitude of alcohol intake levels in juvenile male and female P rats. These results suggest that the neural substrates underlying divergent ethanol drinking behavior in P/NP and HAD/LAD lines of rats are present early in life.     

Clozapine''s Effects on Ethanol''s Motivational Properties

BACKGROUND: Although dopamine D1 and D2 receptors have been implicated in ethanol's motivational effects, little is known about the contribution of dopamine D4 receptors. The present experiments examined the effects of clozapine, a dopamine D4 receptor antagonist, on ethanol's aversive, rewarding, stimulant, and reinforcing properties. METHODS: For taste conditioning, adult male Swiss-Webster mice received five conditioning trials consisting of 1-hr access to 0.2 M NaCl. After NaCl access on trials 1-4, subjects received clozapine (0, 1, or 2 mg/kg) followed 30 min later by 0, 2, or 4 g/kg ethanol. For place conditioning, Swiss-Webster mice received six pairings of a tactile stimulus with ethanol (2 g/kg, intraperitoneally), clozapine (1 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) + ethanol, or clozapine alone. Locomotor activity in a 30-min test was determined in Swiss-Webster mice receiving 0, 0.5, or 1.0 mg/kg clozapine and 0, 1, or 2 g/kg ethanol. In a drinking study, separate groups of adult male C57BL/6J mice were allowed 30-min access to either 10% v/v ethanol mixed in 10% w/v sucrose or 10% sucrose without ethanol. During testing, both groups were given 0 or 1 mg/kg clozapine 30 min before fluid access. RESULTS: Ethanol flavor pairings during taste conditioning reduced subsequent flavor intakes, indicating the development of conditioned taste aversion. Clozapine reduced the magnitude of 4 g/kg ethanol-conditioned aversion only on trial 4 at the 2 mg/kg dose. Conditioned place preference for the ethanol-paired stimulus was not altered by clozapine. Clozapine alone did not produce either conditioned preference or aversion. Ethanol-stimulated activity was reduced by clozapine treatment. However, clozapine alone did not alter locomotor activity levels. Clozapine reduced sucrose consumption but did not alter ethanol/sucrose intake. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that clozapine influences a limited range of ethanol-motivated behaviors. Specifically, dopamine D4 receptors appear important for ethanol's stimulant effect and possibly ethanol aversion, but not ethanol reward and reinforcement.     

Low-dose stimulatory effects of ethanol during adolescence in rat lines selectively bred for high alcohol intake

Abstract : Background: The low‐dose stimulatory effect of ethanol (EtOH) in rats has been hypothesized to reflect its hedonic effects and to be associated with a genetic predisposition toward high alcohol preference. To test the hypothesis that phenotypes associated with high alcohol preference in adulthood are also present in adolescent rats at the time of onset of alcohol drinking, the current study examined the effects of EtOH on locomotor activity (LMA) during adolescence in lines of rats selectively bred for divergent alcohol intakes. Methods: Subjects were adolescent (31–40 days of age) rats from the alcohol‐preferring (P) and ‐nonpreferring (NP) lines and from the high–alcohol‐drinking (HAD) and low–alcohol‐drinking (LAD) replicate lines. On day 1, all subjects (n= 8–10/line/gender/dose) received intraperitoneal saline injections and were placed in the activity monitor for 30 min. On day 2, subjects received intraperitoneal saline or 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, or 1.5 g EtOH/kg. Results: The LMA of male and female P rats was increased with low doses (0.25–0.75 g/kg) and decreased at the highest dose (1.5 g/kg) of EtOH. Similar effects were observed with low doses of EtOH on the LMA of HAD‐1 and HAD‐2 rats. None of the EtOH doses stimulated LMA in the NP, LAD‐1, or LAD‐2 rats, although all of the low–alcohol‐intake lines of rats showed decreased LMA at the highest dose of EtOH. Only the P rats among the high–alcohol‐consuming lines of rats showed decreased LMA at the highest dose of EtOH. Conclusion: Selective breeding for high alcohol consumption seems to be associated with increased sensitivity to the low‐dose stimulating effects of EtOH and reduced sensitivity to the high‐dose motor‐impairing effects of ethanol. The expression of these phenotypes emerges during adolescence by the age of onset of alcohol‐drinking behavior.     

Effects of Naloxone on Limited-Access Ethanol Drinking in Rats

The hypothesis that naloxone (NAL) decreases oral ethanol intake in rats by inducing a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) to ethanol was investigated. Rats were trained to drink 8% ethanol (v/v) on a 1-hr limited-access schedule. They received 4 days of intraperitoneal injections of 10 mg/kg of NAL, 10 min before limited-access (–10MIN group), immediately after limited-access (1HR group), or 3 hr after limited-access (3HR). Ethanol intake decreased in the -10MIN and 1HR groups during the injection period and on the postinjection day. In experiment 2, rats received 4 days of NAL injections when ethanol was not available (pre-exposure), and then the paradigm was repeated. In this experiment, there was no suppression of ethanol intake for any group on the postinjection day. The decrease in ethanol intake during injections observed for the 1HR in experiment 1 and the sustained suppression postinjection was interpreted as a CTA. Pre-exposure in experiment 2 abolished the CTA. Differences in the pattern ethanol intake for the -10MIN and 3HR groups during the experiments, however, suggest that a CTA is not the sole mechanism underlying NAL's suppressant effects on ethanol intake. In conclusion, in rats both the dose of NAL and the relative timing of NAL injections and ethanol drinking effect subsequent NAL suppression of ethanol intake.     

P rats develop physical dependence on alcohol via voluntary drinking: changes in seizure thresholds, anxiety, and patterns of alcohol drinking

BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that the alcohol-preferring P rat meets many of the criteria for an animal model of alcoholism. However, the development of alcohol dependence has not been explored in rats that self-administer ethanol for less than 15-20 weeks. The present study investigated the development of physical dependence upon alcohol after 2-6 weeks of voluntary alcohol intake. Changes in bicuculline-induced seizure thresholds, microstructure of alcohol drinking, and anxiety-related behavior were used as indices of alcohol dependence. In addition, we evaluated the microstructure of alcohol drinking associated with the development of physical dependence upon alcohol. METHODS: Alcohol (10% ethanol solution) was measured in graduated drinking tubes with both alcohol and water available continuously. Microstructure of alcohol intake was monitored by a computerized drinkometer. Physical dependence upon alcohol was determined by measuring bicuculline-induced seizure thresholds after alcohol withdrawal. Anxiety-related behavior of P rats after alcohol withdrawal was determined by the social interaction and elevated plus maze tests. RESULTS: Initial alcohol intake in the alcohol-preferring P rat was relatively modest (3.9 +/- 0.4 g/kg/day). Four days of forced alcohol exposure (initiation) followed by 6 weeks of voluntary drinking resulted in an increase of alcohol intake to 5.5 +/- 0.2 g/kg/day. Ethanol self-administration for 6 weeks, but not for 2 or 4 weeks, produced a significant reduction (30%; p < 0.05) in bicuculline-induced seizure thresholds during alcohol withdrawal. Alterations in the microstructure of alcohol intake (i.e., 90% increase in the size of alcohol drinking bouts compared to the baseline [p < 0.001] with no change in bout frequency) were associated with the development of alcohol dependence. Termination of alcohol intake after 6 weeks of voluntary alcohol consumption resulted in increased anxiety according to both the social interaction and elevated plus maze tests. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that 6 weeks of voluntary alcohol intake are sufficient for the development of physical dependence upon alcohol in the alcohol-preferring P rats as measured by susceptibility to bicuculline-induced seizures. This time is much shorter than the 15-20 weeks reported earlier. Development of physical dependence to alcohol was associated with an increase in daily alcohol intake (40% over the baseline), an increase in alcohol intake during each drinking bout (90% over the baseline), and elevated anxiety during alcohol withdrawal.     

The effects of neuropeptide S on ethanol drinking and other related behaviors in alcohol-preferring and -nonpreferring rats

Background.  Neuropeptide S (NPS) is a 20-amino-acid peptide, identified in the brain and periphery, that is reported to regulate arousal, anxiety, and feeding behavior. Studies were conducted to determine whether this peptide would alter ethanol intake, sucrose intake, anxiety, and general motor activity in alcohol-preferring (P) and -nonpreferring (NP) rats.
Methods.  Experiment 1 : P and NP rats were given 8 weeks of continuous access to ethanol (15% w/v) and water. All rats were implanted with a cannula aimed at either the left or right lateral ventricle and 1 week later were infused with NPS (0.075, 0.3, 1.2 nmol) or artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) and tested for ethanol, food, and water intake. Experiment 2 : The same doses of NPS were administered to a group of P rats and intake of 2.5% (w/v) sucrose was measured. Experiment 3 : Infusions of NPS (1.2 nmol) or aCSF were administered to P rats prior to a 5-minute test on an elevated plus maze. Experiment 4 : Ethanol naive P and NP rats were infused with NPS (0.075, 0.15, 0.3, 0.6, and 1.2 nmol) or aCSF prior to a 20-minute test in activity monitors.
Results.  NPS reduced ethanol intake in P, but not in NP rats. It did not influence sucrose solution intake in P rats. However, an increase in food intake was seen in both rat lines following lower doses of the peptide. NPS did neither alter anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze test nor was there an effect on general motor activity; however, there was an increase in the amount of time spent in the center of the activity monitors following infusions of 0.6 nmol of NPS in P, but not in NP rats, indicating anxioltyic actions of the peptide.
Conclusions.  These data suggest a role for NPS in the modulation of ethanol drinking and possibly anxiety-like behavior in rats selectively bred for high alcohol drinking.     

Motivation for Alcohol Becomes Resistant to Quinine Adulteration After 3 to 4 Months of Intermittent Alcohol Self‐Administration

Background: Continued consumption of alcohol despite deleterious consequences is a hallmark of alcoholism and represents a critical challenge to therapeutic intervention. Previous rat studies showed that enduring alcohol self‐administration despite pairing alcohol with normally aversive stimuli was only observed after very long‐term intake (>8 months). Aversion‐resistant alcohol intake has been previously interpreted to indicate pathological or compulsive motivation to consume alcohol. However, given the time required to model compulsive alcohol seeking in previous studies, there is considerable interest in developing more efficient and quantitative rodent models of aversion‐resistant alcohol self‐administration. Methods: Outbred Wistar rats underwent 3 to 4 months or approximately 1.5 months of intermittent, home‐cage, two‐bottle access (IAA) to 20% alcohol (v/v) or water. Then, after brief operant training, the effect of the bitter‐tasting quinine (0.1 g/l) on the motivation to seek alcohol was quantified via progressive ratio (PR). Motivation for quinine‐adulterated 2% sucrose under PR was assayed in a separate cohort of 3 to 4 months IAA rats. The effects of quinine on home‐cage alcohol consumption in IAA rats and rats with continuous access to alcohol were also examined. Finally, a dose–response for quinine taste preference in IAA and continuous‐access animals was determined. Results: Motivation for alcohol after 3 to 4 months IAA, measured using an operant PR procedure, was not altered by adulteration of alcohol with 0.1 g/l quinine. In contrast, after 3 to 4 months of IAA, motivation for sucrose under PR was significantly reduced by adulteration of sucrose with 0.1 g/l quinine. In addition, motivation for alcohol after only approximately 1.5 months IAA was significantly reduced by adulteration of alcohol with 0.1 g/l quinine. Furthermore, home‐cage alcohol intake by IAA rats was insensitive to quinine at concentrations (0.01, 0.03 g/l) that significantly reduced alcohol drinking in animals with continuous access to alcohol. Finally, no changes in quinine taste preference after 3 to 4 months IAA or continuous access to alcohol were observed. Conclusions: We have developed a novel and technically simple hybrid operant/IAA model in which quinine‐resistant motivation for alcohol is evident after an experimentally tractable period of time (3 to 4 months vs. 8 months). Quinine dramatically reduced sucrose and water intake by IAA rats, indicating that continued responding for alcohol in IAA rats despite adulteration with the normally aversive quinine might reflect maladaptive or compulsive motivation for alcohol. This model could facilitate identification of novel therapeutic interventions for pathological alcohol seeking in humans.     

Effect of ethanol on hypothalamic opioid peptides, enkephalin, and dynorphin: relationship with circulating triglycerides

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence has demonstrated that ethanol intake can stimulate the expression and production of the feeding-stimulatory peptide, galanin (GAL), in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN), and that PVN injection of this peptide, in turn, can increase the consumption of ethanol. To test the hypothesis that other feeding-related systems are involved in ethanol intake, this study examined the effect of ethanol on the hypothalamic opioid peptides, enkephalin (ENK), and dynorphin (DYN). METHOD: Adult, male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to voluntarily drink increasing concentrations of ethanol, up to 9% v/v, on a 12-hour access schedule or were given a single injection of ethanol (10% v/v) versus saline vehicle. The effect of ethanol on GAL, ENK, and DYN mRNA was measured using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and radiolabeled in situ hybridization, while radioimmunoassay was used to measure peptide levels. In addition to blood alcohol, circulating levels of triglycerides (TG), leptin, and insulin were also measured. RESULTS: The data demonstrated that: (1) rats voluntarily drinking 9% v/v ethanol (approximately 2.0 g/kg/d) show a significant increase in GAL, ENK, and DYN mRNA in the PVN compared with water-drinking rats; (2) voluntary consumption of ethanol also increases peptide levels of ENK and DYN in the PVN; (3) acute injection of 10% ethanol (1.0 g/kg of 10% v/v) similarly increases the expression of GAL, ENK, and DYN in the PVN; and (4) ethanol consumption and injection, while having little effect on leptin and insulin, consistently increase circulating levels of TG as well as alcohol, both of which are strongly, positively correlated with peptide expression in the PVN. CONCLUSIONS: These findings, together with published studies, suggest a possible role for hypothalamic opioid peptides in the drinking of ethanol. Based on evidence that dietary fat and lipid injections stimulate the PVN peptides and injection of the opiates and GAL increase ethanol intake, it is proposed that both TG and alcohol in the circulation, which are elevated by the ingestion or injection of ethanol, are involved in stimulating these peptides in the PVN, which in turn promote further consumption of ethanol.