Endovascular approaches to ruptured infrarenal aorto-iliac aneurysms

BACKGROUND: Ruptured abdominal aortoiliac aneurysms (RAAAs) carry a high mortality when treated by open surgical repair. Since 1994, we have employed endovascular approaches to treat this entity. METHODS: Patients with presumed RAAAs were treated with restricted fluid resuscitation (hypotensive hemostasis), rapid transport to the operating room, placement of a transbrachial or transfemoral guidewire under local anesthesia, and urgent arteriography. In patients with suitable anatomy, endovascular graft repair was performed. If the anatomy was unsuitable, standard open repair was performed. If the patient had circulatory collapse, proximal balloon control was employed. RESULTS: Of 31 patients managed in this fashion, 25 underwent endovascular graft repair. Six required open repair. Total operative mortality was 9.7% (3 patients). Only 10 patients required proximal balloon aortic control. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular techniques (proximal balloon control and endografts) may improve treatment outcomes for RAAAs. Restricted resuscitation (hypotensive hemostasis) can be effective in the RAAA setting.     

Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: systematic literature review

Endovascular repair is increasingly used for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs). This study estimated the mortality rate for this approach. A review of 307 publications in English was performed. Thirty-four publications representing 1,200 patients with RAAA were deemed appropriate for analysis by weighted least squares regression. Of the 1,200 patients, 531 (44.3%) underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The average age was 74 years, and 13% were female. Aortouni-iliac grafts were used in 49.4% of patients, and 50.6% received bifurcated grafts. The technical success rate was 94.9%, with a mortality rate of 30.2%. The ratio of endovascular cases to the total number of cases strongly predicted the mortality rate (weighted coefficient -0.378, p< .0003). The mortality rate following EVAR of RAAA is 30%. A 3.8% reduction in mortality was found for each 10% increase in the percentage of ruptures repaired endovascularly at each center. These results are suggestive of a learning curve.     

Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: The perioperative mortality for people with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA) has not changed for two decades. Of patients who survive long enough to undergo open repair for ruptured aneurysms, half die (48%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 46 to 50). Randomized trials have shown that endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms decreases perioperative mortality compared with open repair. EVAR may similarly benefit patients with RAAA. We aimed to summarize studies of patients undergoing EVAR for ruptured aneurysms. METHODS: Two reviewers searched Medline and EMBASE databases from 1994 to July 2006, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Best Evidence 1994 to 2006, reference lists, clinical trial registries, and conference proceedings; we also contacted authors. All published and unpublished studies in which a group of people with ruptured aneurysms, assessed objectively by imaging, was treated with EVAR (REVAR) were eligible. We used the generic inverse variance function of the REVMAN software to pool results for death in hospital. Sensitivity analyses, using prespecified subgroups, explored heterogeneity between studies. RESULTS: Pooled mortality in 18 observational studies describing 436 people who underwent REVAR was 21% (95% CI 13 to 29); however, 90% of the heterogeneity between studies was not explained by chance alone. Surgical volume explained substantial heterogeneity. According to study-specific criteria, 47% (95% CI 39 to 55) of people with ruptured aneurysms were potentially eligible for REVAR. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality in people who underwent REVAR is lower than that in historical reports of unselected people undergoing open repair. Further investigation is needed to determine whether the difference in mortality is attributable to patient selection alone or to this new approach to treatment.     

Evaluation of the effect of endovascular options on infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Endovascular devices designed to exclude flow to infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States in 1999. This action allowed widespread use of this technology for AAA exclusion. The purpose of this report is to examine trends for use of these modalities, rates of rupture of AAA, and to compare results of open AAA repair with endovascular repair. Results were collected for all hospitals, except for Veterans Administration hospitals, by a state-wide repository. Data for the years 1996 through 1998 and 2001 through 2002 were evaluated, and data from 1999 through 2000 were excluded because no separate codes were available to distinguish between open and endovascular repair. The information gathered is based on the All Patient Refined Diagnostic Related Group (APRDRG; 3M, St. Paul, MN). An average of 718 open, elective AAA was performed between 1996 and 1998. This dropped to 503 open repairs from 2001 to 2002 (P < 0.005). During that same interval, 308 endovascular elective AAA repairs were performed, therefore the total rate of elective repair increased by 100. The average rate of ruptured AAA repairs from 1996 to 1998 was 121 per year, and this dropped to 89 from 2001 to 2002 (P < 0.005). The mortality of open AAA repair during the 1996 to 1998 and 2001 to 2002 intervals was unchanged (4.7%). Mortality from endovascular AAA repair between 2001 and 2002 was 1.9 per cent (P = 0.003). Major morbidity was 14.5 per cent for open, elective AAA repair and 6.3 per cent for endovascular elective repair from 2001 to 2002 (P < 0.001). These data suggest that the advent of endovascular AAA repair has contributed to a reduction in the rate of ruptured AAA repairs, an increase in total procedures performed, and a significant decrease in perioperative deaths and major complications when compared with open AAA repair.     

Is there a selection bias in applying endovascular aneurysm repair for rupture?

Accumulating data suggest that endovascular repair (EVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs) leads to reduced mortality, but concern exists that this may reflect selection bias. We reviewed our overall rupture experience early after our protocol was instituted to explore this question. We instituted a defined protocol for RAAA with emphasis on EVAR in July 2002, which included device availability (consignment), preoperative training, 24-hr access to our surgical endosuite and ability to operate imaging in an emergency, and immediate availability of a transbrachial balloon cutdown cart for all cases. Charts of all RAAA patients who arrived in the operating room alive since institution of our protocol were reviewed. Computed tomographic (CT) scans were re-reviewed to assess potentially suitable anatomic candidates. From July 2002 to May 2006, a total of 52 RAAAs were treated at our institution: 15 pararenal RAAAs, all treated by open repair (PR-OPEN), and 37 infrarenal RAAAs, 20 treated by open repair (IR-OPEN) and 17 treated by EVAR (IR-EVAR, 32% of all ruptures). Mortality rates in the three groups were 47%, 75%, and 35% (p < 0.02 vs. IR-OPEN), respectively. Although mortality was significantly lower in the EVAR group, overall mortality was 53% (28/52). On re-review of the operative notes and CT scans, it is estimated that more than half of those cases repaired using open techniques could have been repaired using EVAR based on anatomic criteria alone. The most common reason for open repair was hemodynamic instability preoperatively; only a minority of cases were excluded from EVAR based on unfavorable anatomy after CT scan review in the emergency room. In conclusion, during our early experience EVAR for rupture was associated with significantly reduced mortality. However, our overall mortality was no different from historical values, and this fact along with the extremely high mortality seen in the IR-OPEN group suggest that we are simply selecting patients with the greatest chance of survival to undergo EVAR. It also appears that many patients who are anatomically suitable for EVAR are undergoing open operation because of hemodynamic instability. If EVAR for rupture truly decreases mortality in all patients, a much more aggressive attitude toward EVAR may be required to lower the overall mortality rate.     

Epidemiological study of the relationship between volume and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in the UK from 2000 to 2005

BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess the relationship between hospital volume and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery in the UK. METHODS: Hospital Episode Statistics (2000-2005) were classified as elective, urgent or ruptured AAA repair. Analysis was by modelling of mortality rate, complication rate and length of hospital stay with regard to the annual operative volume, after risk adjustment. RESULTS: There were 112,545 diagnoses, or repairs, of AAAs, of which 26,822 were infrarenal aneurysms. The mean mortality rate was 7.4, 23.6 and 41.8 per cent for elective, urgent and ruptured AAA repair respectively. Elective AAA repair undertaken at high-volume hospitals showed volume-related improvements in mortality (P < 0.001). Patients were discharged from hospital earlier (P < 0.001). The critical volume threshold was 32 elective AAA repairs per year. For urgent repair, patients at high-volume hospitals had a reduced mortality rate (P = 0.017) with an increased length of stay (P = 0.041). There was no relationship between volume and outcome for ruptured AAA repairs. CONCLUSION: Increased annual volumes were associated with significant reductions in mortality for elective and urgent AAA repair, but not for repair of ruptured AAAs.     

Isolated iliac artery aneurysms: a contemporary comparison of endovascular and open repair

OBJECTIVE: Iliac artery aneurysms are rare but associated with significant morbidity and mortality when ruptured. This study compares recent open and endovascular repairs of iliac aneurysms at a single institution. METHODS: Patients were identified and charts reviewed using ICD-9 and CPT codes for iliac artery aneurysm and open or endovascular repair performed between January 2000 and January 2006. Baseline characteristics, procedure-related variables, and follow-up data were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were treated with isolated iliac artery aneurysms. There were 19 open and 52 endovascular repairs. Seven presented with acute ruptures and were treated by open (4) or endovascular (3) repair. Preoperative comorbidities were similar between the two groups. Major perioperative (30 day) complications included three deaths in the open group from cardiovascular complications, all after ruptured aneurysm repair, and one death in the endovascular group (after rupture; one additional perioperative death occurred after 30 days due to colonic infarction) (P = NS). Postoperative complications were less frequent in the endovascular group, although this did not reach statistical significance. The mortality was 50% in the open group and 33% in the endovascular group for patients presenting with a ruptured aneurysm (P = NS). Transfusion requirement was significantly higher in the open group (47%) than in the endovascular group (6%) (P = .03). The mean follow-up was 20 +/- 5 months in the open group and 17 +/- 2 months in the endovascular group (P = NS). Long-term complications included two limb thromboses following repair with a bifurcated stent graft that were treated with thrombolysis plus stenting or a fem-fem bypass. Three endoleaks were identified on postop CT scans, all of which were successfully managed with endovascular techniques. There were no postoperative ruptures or aneurysm-related death. The mean postoperative length of stay was 5.2 +/- 2.3 days (open) and 1.3 +/- 1.0 days (endovascular) (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large, case control study comparing open vs endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysms. Endovascular repair of iliac artery aneurysms is safe and results in decreased length of stay, lower requirement for perioperative blood transfusion, and similar intermediate term outcomes as open repair.     

A statewide experience with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: rapid diffusion with excellent early results

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare survival and outcomes of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in New York State (NYS). METHODS: We used the NYS discharge dataset Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) to analyze the outcomes of elective admission for nonruptured (International Classification of Diseases-9th revision [ICD-9] 441.4) open aneurysm repair (38.44) and endovascular aneurysm repair (39.71) during the years 2000-2002. The ICD-9 code for endovascular repair was introduced in late 2000, thus capturing 3 months of empiric data for 2000. RESULTS: There has been a significant increase in the number of AAA procedures performed in NYS (comparing before and after 2000: average, 1419 vs 1701; P =.0001), temporally coinciding with the implementation of training programs after US Food and Drug Administration approval of endovascular grafts and the new payment code. From 2000 to 2002 the number of NYS hospitals performing endovascular repairs increased from 24 to 60. By 2002 there were more endovascular repairs being performed than open repairs (871 vs 783). The target population for these surgical interventions showed interesting differences. In 2002, women had a 43% chance of receiving an endograft, whereas men had a 55% probability. The use of endovascular repair over the observation period was relatively constant in patients younger than 65 years. In patients older than 65 years, and especially those older than 75 years, endovascular use increased substantially, so that by 2002 older patients were more likely to undergo endovascular repair than open repair. Patients who underwent endovascular repair had significantly more hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia than did patients who underwent open repair. Yet the mean length of stay for endovascular procedures was approximately 3.6 days, and for open procedures was about 10.3 days, across all 3 years (P = <.0001). Moreover, patients who underwent endovascular repair had statistically fewer postoperative complications and significantly lower mortality. In-hospital mortality in 2001 was 3.55% for open repair and 1.14% for endovascular repair (P =.0018), and in 2002 these rates were 4.21% versus 0.8% (P <.0001), respectively. CONCLUSION: This dataset suggests that endovascular AAA repairs are being performed in a patient population with a higher frequency of comorbidities. However, endovascular repairs still are associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality, fewer postoperative complications, and a dramatically shorter length of stay. These results suggest that, despite the rapid diffusion of this new technique, early perioperative outcomes may be superior to those with conventional open repair. However, prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm these insights, and such studies may require the infrastructure of consortia of hospitals or society-based registries.     

Endovascular ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVRAR): a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: To review evidence supporting the use of endovascular ruptured aneurysm repair (EVRAR) for treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). METHODS: A systematic review of the medical literature was performed for relevant studies. We searched a number of electronic databases and hand-searched relevant journals until November 2006 to identify studies for inclusion. We considered studies in which patients with a confirmed ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm were treated with EVRAR, which reported endpoints of mortality and major complications. RESULTS: There was 1 randomised controlled trial (RCT), 33 non-randomised case series (24 retrospective and 9 prospective) reports were identified comparing EVRAR (n=891) with conventional open surgical repair for the treatment of RAAA. Whilst no benefit in the primary outcome of mortality was noted in the only RCT, evidence from non-randomised studies suggest that EVRAR is feasible in selected patients, where it may be associated with a trend towards reductions in blood loss, duration of intensive care treatment, early complications, and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of symptomatic or ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, emergency endovascular repair (EVRAR) is feasible in selected patients, with early outcomes comparable to best conventional open surgical repair for the treatment of RAAA.     

Clamp before you cut: Proximal control of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms using endovascular balloon occlusion--Case reports

While the mortality rate for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair has declined over the last several decades, the rate for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) has unfortunately remained disturbingly high. Undiagnosed aneurysms may present with little warning until abdominal pain, syncope, and hypotension signify rupture. Fifty percent of patients with ruptured aneurysms die before reaching a medical facility, and their survival is highly dependent on hemodynamic stability at presentation. The degree of rupture containment and comorbid status of the patient determine hemodynamic stability. Endovascular stent grafting has significantly improved perioperative morbidity and mortality rates for elective AAA repair, and some of the same endovascular techniques can be used to obtain proximal control in patients presenting with RAAA. We describe 3 consecutive cases of RAAA where proximal control was obtained using a percutaneously placed, transfemoral aortic occlusion balloon before induction of anesthesia.     

腹主动脉瘤破裂腔内治疗的荟萃分析

目的 系统评价血管腔内修复术(vascular edovascular repair,EVAR)治疗腹主动脉瘤破裂(ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms,RAAA)的有效性与安全性.方法 计算机检索PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、中国生物医学文献数据库、中文科技期刊全文数据库及中国期刊全文数据库等数据库,并辅以手工检索近年发表的中文期刊.对纳入文献采用RevMan 5.0.18软件进行Meta分析.结果 纳入9篇文献.1篇随机对照试验(RCT),8篇队列研究共2402例患者,Meta分析结果显示:与开放手术比较,血管腔内修复术可明显降低术后30 d死亡率[OR =0.47,95％ CI(0.39,0.57),P＜0.01]和并发症发生率OR=0.47,95％ CI(0.39,0.57),P＜0.01.血管腔内修复术与开放手术相比,在术后早期再手术率[ OR=0.86,95％ CI(0.55,1.33),P=0.5]及中期死亡率[OR=1.24,95％ CI(0.46,3.37),P＜0.67]方面差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 对于合适的腹主动脉瘤破裂的患者,腔内治疗是可行的,并且逐渐显现出相对传统开腹手术更大的优势,短期疗效较好,术后并发症相对较少.     

Open aneurysm repair at an endovascular center: value of a modified retroperitoneal approach in patients at high risk with difficult aneurysms

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and the role of a modified retroperitoneal approach in a high-volume endovascular center. METHODS: We reviewed prospectively collected data for 175 elective infrarenal open AAA repairs performed over 6 years. A transperitoneal approach was used in 118 procedures, and a modified retroperitoneal approach was used in 57 procedures. The incisional modification, which facilitated repair in patients with massive obesity, scarring, or ventral hernia, included a higher, more posterolateral location in the ninth intercostal space. Risk factors that added to the difficulty of the repair included aneurysms with a short (<1 cm) or no aortic neck in 45 patients; large, angled or flared aortic neck in 32 patients;, tortuous and calcified iliac arteries in 6 patients; morbid obesity in 10 patients; low ejection fraction (15%-30%) in 14 patients; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with forced expiratory volume at 1 second less than 55% in 4 patients; previous laparotomy in 18 patients; previous left-sided colectomy in 11 patients; large right iliac aneurysm in 8 patients; large ventral hernia in 8 patients; pelvic irradiation in 4 patients; failed endovascular repair in 5 patients; and previous failed open repair attempt in 2 patients. Many of these factors occurred with significantly greater frequency (P =.04-.001) in the retroperitoneal group. All factors were correlated with outcome. RESULTS: Despite these risk factors, overall 30-day mortality was 3.5% (retroperitoneal group, 3.8%), and mean length of hospital stay was 9 days (retroperitoneal group, 8 days). There was no significant correlation between mortality or length of stay and any of the mentioned risk factors (P >.2). CONCLUSION: In the era of endovascular aneurysm exclusion, open AAA repair is generally used to treat anatomically complex or difficult aneurysms, many of which are present in patients at high risk. Despite this combination of anatomic and systemic risk factors, the modified retroperitoneal approach facilitates treatment in difficult circumstances and enables open AAA repair to be performed with acceptable mortality and morbidity.     

Endovascular repair of aortic rupture due to trauma and aneurysm.

OBJECTIVES: to report a single centre experience with endovascular repair of the ruptured descending thoracic and abdominal aorta. DESIGN: prospective non-randomised study in a university hospital. MATERIAL and METHODS: between 1995 and 2000, endovascular treatment was utilised for 231 aortic repairs; in 37 cases (16%) endografting was conducted on an emergency basis for 21 ruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysms, 15 ruptured descending thoracic aortic lesions, and 1 ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The feasibility of endovascular treatment and the prostheses' size were determined, based on preoperative spiral CT and intraoperative angiography, both obtained in each patient. RESULTS: endografting was successfully completed in 35 patients (95%). Primary conversion to open repair was necessary in 2 patients (5%). Postoperative 30-day mortality rate was 11% (4 deaths). No patient developed postoperative temporary or permanent paraplegia. In 2 patients (5%) primary endoleaks required overstenting and in 6 patients (16%) secondary surgical interventions were required. Mean follow-up was 19 months (1-70 months); three deaths occurred within three months postoperatively (1-year survival rate 81+/-6%). In one case, secondary conversion to open repair was necessary 14 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: the feasibility of endoluminal repair of the ruptured aorta has been demonstrated. Endoluminal treatment may reduce morbidity and mortality, and may in time become the procedure of choice in certain centres. However, further follow-up is required to determine the long-term efficacy.     

Endovascular management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: 6-year experience from a Greek center

OBJECTIVE: To report our early experience with endovascular treatment of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs). METHODS: Between March 1998 and October 2004, 40 consecutive patients with an RAAA presented to our unit; 38 underwent assessment by computed tomography, whereas 2 died on arrival before any assessment and treatment was possible. Twenty-three patients (61%) were suitable for stent grafting, and all proceeded to endovascular repair. Of these, 17 underwent operation with local anesthesia, 1 did so under general anesthesia, and a further 5 procedures were commenced under local anesthesia and converted to general anesthesia. A total of 14 bifurcated and 10 aortouni-iliac stent grafts were implanted; in 1 patient, the bifurcated graft was converted to an aortouni-iliac repair during surgery because of technical difficulties. RESULTS: Stent-graft deployment in the intended location without a type I or III endoleak was technically successful in 22 of the 23 patients. There were no conversions to open surgery. The 30-day mortality was 39%. Six patients died immediately or soon after the procedure because of severe hypovolemic shock, and three died within 30 days from cardiac causes. After surgery, 13 complications were encountered in 10 patients (3 cardiac, 4 respiratory, 5 renal, and 1 implant related). Two patients required reintervention--one for a type I endoleak and one for limb occlusion. There were 14 survivors. During a median follow-up of 410 days (range, 90-1650 days), 2 more patients died from myocardial infarction, and 9 remain well; 3 patients were lost to follow-up. There were three secondary interventions (two for type I endoleak and one for stent-graft thrombosis). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of RAAAs is feasible, and the early experience is promising. More experience and evidence from randomized trials are needed to determine whether such an approach is superior to open surgery.     

The Amsterdam Acute Aneurysm Trial: Suitability and Application Rate for Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

PURPOSE: To evaluate anatomical suitability and application rate for endovascular repair of patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). METHODS: The Amsterdam Acute Aneurysm trial is a multicenter randomised trial comparing open with endovascular treatment in patients with a RAAA (International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 66212637). Between April 2004 and January 2006, all consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of a RAAA at presentation were assessed prospectively. Anatomical suitability for endovascular repair was based on use of an aorto-uni-iliac endovascular graft and assessed in patients with a proven aortic rupture on CT angiography (CTA). RESULTS: In 128/256 patients, presenting with clinical suspicion of a ruptured aneurysm, RAAA was diagnosed. 105 patients were brought to a trial center and CTA confirmed RAAA in 83 patients. In 38 of 83 patients (45.8%) with positive CTA, the anatomy of the aorta and iliac arteries was considered suitable for endovascular repair. Exclusion from endovascular repair was due to unsuitable infrarenal neck or iliac anatomy (37 and 8 patients respectively). Overall, endovascular treatment was applicable in 38/128 patients (29.7%) with a RAAA in the Amsterdam region and in 38 out of 105 patients (35.5%) admitted to the trial centers. CONCLUSION: In this prospective cohort of all patients with a RAAA in the Amsterdam Acute Aneurysm Trial region, the suitability for endovascular repair in patients with a RAAA confirmed on CTA is 45.8%, but the application rate was lower.     

腔内修复完全替代开放手术治疗急性破裂性腹主动脉瘤可行性研究

目的 探讨应用腔内修复（EVAR）完全替代开放手术治疗急性腹主动脉瘤的可行性。方法 回顾性分析复旦大学附属中山医院血管外科2009年1月至2019年12月期间收治的121例真性破裂性腹主动脉瘤的病人资料。对比“选择性EVAR（EVAR/Open）”时期（2009年1月至2014年3月）与“完全EVAR（EVAR Only）”时期（2014年4月至2019年12月）的两种治疗策略的疗效。结果 121例真性破裂性腹主动脉瘤病人中,29例于术前放弃手术或死亡。其中,在“EVAR/Open”时期,40例（19例EVAR及21例开放手术）接受外科治疗,EVAR及开放手术后30 d病死率分别为26.3%及23.8%（P=0.94）;而在“EVAR Only”时期共52例全部接受EVAR治疗,术后30 d病死率为23.1%。两个时期病死率差异无统计学意义（P=0.83）。两个时期内均未观察到不同术式在不同术前血流动力学状态及不同瘤体解剖学条件中对病死率有明显的影响。结论 基于所在中心平诊手术经验的“完全EVAR”策略可有效用于几乎所有破裂性腹主动脉瘤的急诊救治,并获得与“选择性EVAR”策略一致的疗效。     

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: eligibility rate and impact on the rate of open repair

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of eligibility among patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) considered for endovascular repair and to examine the effect of an endovascular program on the institutional pattern of AAA repair. METHODS: All patients evaluated for endovascular AAA repair since the inception of an endovascular program were reviewed for determination of eligibility rates and eventual treatment. Open AAA repairs were categorized as simple (uncomplicated infrarenal), complex (juxtarenal, suprarenal, thoracoabdominal, infected), or ruptured, and their rates before and after initiation of an endovascular program were compared. RESULTS: Over 3 years, 324 patients were considered for endovascular AAA repair; 176 (54%) were candidates, 138 (43%) were not candidates, and 10 (3%) did not complete the evaluation. The rate of eligibility increased significantly from 45% (66/148 patients) during the first half of this period to 63% (110/176 patients) during the second half (P <. 001). Candidates were significantly younger (74.4 +/- 7.6 years) than noncandidates (78.3 +/- 6.7 years) (P <.01), and their aneurysm diameter tended to be smaller (57.6 +/- 9.2 mm compared with 60.8 +/- 12.3 mm; P =.06). The most common reason for ineligibility was an inadequate proximal aortic neck. Of 176 candidates, 78% underwent endovascular repair, and 6% underwent open repair. Of 138 noncandidates, 56% underwent surgical repair. Over a period of 6 years, 542 patients with AAAs (429 simple, 86 complex, 27 ruptured) underwent open repair. The total number and ratio of simple to complex open repairs for nonruptured aneurysms during the 3 years before the initiation of the endovascular program (213 simple, 44 complex) were not significantly different from the repairs over the subsequent 3-year period (216 simple, 42 complex). Similarly, no difference in the total number and the ratio of simple to complex open repairs was found between the first and the second 18-month periods since the initiation of the endovascular program. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of eligibility of patients with AAA for endovascular repair appears to be higher than previously reported. The presence of an active endovascular program has not decreased the number or shifted the distribution of open AAA repair.     

Evaluation of the complexity of open abdominal aneurysm repair in the era of endovascular stent grafting

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular repair has proven to be an effective treatment for many abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Aneurysms that require open repair have usually been disqualified from an endovascular approach as a result of a variety of anatomic constraints, which may also make open repair more difficult. Our purpose was to review open AAA repair and assess the complexity of the operative procedure and associated morbidity and mortality data in the era of endovascular stent grafting. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 606 patients undergoing elective open AAA repair at a single tertiary care community hospital from January 1, 1996, to December 31, 2004. Patients with ruptured aneurysms and all endovascular repairs were excluded. Patients were grouped into two categories. Group 1 included 301 patients who underwent open repair before the initiation of an endovascular stent grafting program in November 1999. Group 2 included 305 patients who underwent open repair after the initiation of the stent graft program. Operative reports were reviewed to determine the location of the proximal aortic cross clamp, management of the renal vein, associated iliac aneurysmal or occlusive disease, and type of surgical reconstruction. Morbidity, mortality, and disposition data were compared for the two groups and subjected to chi2 analysis. RESULTS: Suprarenal aortic cross-clamp placement was required in 6% of group 1 patients and 20% of group 2 patients (P < .05). Division of the renal vein was necessary in 11% of group 1 patients and 18% of group 2 patients (P < .05). Iliac aneurysms were present in 25% of group 1 patients and 42% of group 2 patients (P < .05). The incidence of associated iliac occlusive disease was 12% in group 1 and 20% in group 2 (P < .05). The type of reconstruction required (aortoaorto, aortoiliac, aortofemoral) was not found to be statistically significant. All major sources of morbidity, including renal insufficiency, myocardial infarction, stroke, and intubation times, were similar between the two groups. The length of stay was 9.2 days in both groups, and 11.3% of group 1 patients and 26% of group 2 patients were discharged to an extended-care facility rather than directly home. The overall mortality rate was 2.0% for patients in group 1 and 3.8% for group 2 patients. This was not a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons performing open repair of AAA in the era of endovascular stent grafting are operating on patients who require more complex repairs, including a greater frequency of suprarenal cross clamping, renal vein division, and management of associated iliac aneurysmal and occlusive disease. Despite this, morbidity and mortality rates are similar to those in patients operated on before the initiation of an endovascular stent grafting program.     

Endovascular technology, hospital volume, and mortality with abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the introduction of endovascular technology changed the relationship of hospital volume to mortality with abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: Data from all hospitals in the United States that performed abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery on Medicare patients from 2001 to 2003 were obtained from the national Medicare database. The primary outcome variable was death 相似文献   

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: endovascular program development and results

Improvements in endovascular technology and techniques have allowed us to treat patients in ways we never thought possible. Today endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms is associated with markedly decreased morbidity and mortality when compared to the open surgical approach, yet there are several fundamental obstacles in our ability to offer these endovascular techniques to most patients with ruptured aneurysms. This article will focus on the technical aspects of endovascular aneurysm repair for rupture, with particular attention to developing a standardized multidisciplinary approach that will help ones ability to deal with not just the technical aspects of these procedures, but also address some of the challenges including: the availability of preoperative CT, the choice of anesthesia, percutaneous vs. femoral cut-down approach, use of aortic occlusion balloons, need for bifurcated vs. aorto-uniiliac stentgrafts, need for adjunctive procedures, diagnosis and treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome, and conversion to open surgical repair.