Hormonal stress response and hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing endovascular vs. conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To investigate the effect of two different surgical techniques with different anesthetic modes on intraoperative and postoperative hormonal stress response, hemodynamic stability, fluid loading and renal function in patients scheduled for elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients scheduled for elective infrarenal AAA repair were allocated without randomizing into two groups: an endovascular (EVAR, n = 20) and a conventional (CAR, n = 20) aneurysm repair group according to aneurysm morphology as determined by preoperative computed tomography and angiography. The EVAR group were operated under spinal anesthesia and the CAR group using general anesthesia with epidural blockade. RESULTS: Patients undergoing CAR showed lower intraoperative mean arterial pressure and significantly higher plasma norepinephrine before aortic cross-clamping and significantly higher lactate after aortic declamping and postoperatively than patients in the EVAR group. Postoperatively, vasopressin and serum cortisol were also significantly higher in the CAR group. Fluid loading and estimated blood loss were more excessive in the CAR group. CONCLUSIONS: Stress response was lower and hemodynamic stability and lower body perfusion superior and renal function also better maintained in patients undergoing EVAR under spinal anesthesia as compared to those undergoing CAR using general anesthesia with epidural blockade.     

Anaesthesia and critical care for scheduled infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

OBJECTIVES: Patient scheduled for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery carries a high risk of cardiac or respiratory comorbidity. To outline the perioperative management for these patients. METHODS: Review of the literature using MesH Terms "abdominal aortic aneurysm", "anesthesia", "analgesia" "critical care" and/or "surgery" in Medline database. RESULTS: Cardiac preoperative evaluation and management have recently been reviewed. Intermediate and high-risk patients should undergo non-invasive cardiac testing to decide between a preoperative medical strategy (using betablocker+/-statin and aspirin) and an interventional strategy (coronary angioplasty or cardiac surgery). Perioperative myocardial ischaemia should also be investigated by clinical, electrocardiographic and biologic monitoring such as plasmatic troponin Ic dosage. Specific score could also assess the respiratory failure risk preoperatively. Epidural analgesia decreases this risk. There is no evidence that a pharmacological treatment decreases the incidence of acute renal failure after aortic surgery. Endovascular repair is actually recommended for older, higher-risk patients or patients with a hostile abdomen or other technical factors that may complicate standard open repair.     

Anesthetic management of a patient with severe combined pulmonary disease under epidural anesthesia with spontaneous respiration

A 74-year-old man with gastric cancer was complicated with abdominal aortic aneurysm. A two-stage operation was scheduled (repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm and subsequent gastrectomy). He also had severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We planned to maintain spontaneous breathing during operations under epidural anesthesia and light general anesthesia. For the first surgery, two epidural catheters were placed at T1-2 and T7-8 on the day before surgery. After establishing epidural anesthesia, general anesthesia was induced and maintained with midazolam, fentanyl and sevoflurane, but without muscle relaxants under BIS monitoring. Ropivacaine solution 0.375% was infused through an epidural catheter to provide analgesia, and spontaneous breathing was kept throughout the procedure. Surgery lasted 4 hours and 50 minutes, and patient recovered without complications. Forty days after the first surgery, the second operation was scheduled. Anesthetic management was almost the same as in the first one, except for the use of dexmedetomizine rather than sevoflurane. In both operations, sufficient analgesia was provided with epidural anesthesia, and the surgeons rated muscle relaxation as satisfactory. No respiratory complications developed postoperatively. Maintaining spontaneous breathing during abdominal surgery using epidural anesthesia and light general anesthesia is a good option for COPD patients.     

Accidental severance of epidural catheter used in a patient with postoperative delirium

A 79-year-old man with an abdominal aortic aneurysm had a lumbar epidural catheter inserted for postoperative pain control of bypass graft surgery with continuous epidural analgesia. Five days after the operation, we noticed that forced traction by the patient with delirium had led to the catheter tip being separated and left behind in his body. The remaining portion of the catheter was detected using a lateral lumbar roentgenogram and CT imaging, and it was later removed surgically. We conclude that it was necessary to change the method of analgesia in this patient, since it was difficult to maintain the epidural catheter.     

Comparison of intravenous or epidural patient-controlled analgesia in the elderly after major abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND: Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous morphine and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), using an opioid either alone or in combination with a local anesthetic, are two major advances in the management of pain after major surgery. However, these techniques have been evaluated poorly in elderly people. This prospective, randomized study compared the effectiveness on postoperative pain and safety of PCEA and PCA after major abdominal surgery in the elderly patient. METHODS: Seventy patients older than 70 yr of age and undergoing major abdominal surgery were assigned randomly to receive either combined epidural analgesia and general anesthesia followed by postoperative PCEA, using a mixture of 0.125% bupivacaine and sufentanil (PCEA group), or general anesthesia followed by PCA with intravenous morphine (PCA group). Pain intensity was tested three times daily using a visual analog scale. Postoperative evaluation included mental status, cardiorespiratory and gastrointestinal functions, and patient satisfaction scores. RESULTS: Pain relief was better at rest (P = 0.001) and after coughing (P = 0.002) in the PCEA group during the 5 postoperative days. Satisfaction scores were better in the PCEA group. Although incidence of delirium was comparable in the PCA and PCEA groups (24% vs. 26%, respectively), mental status was improved on the fourth and fifth postoperative days in the PCEA group. The PCEA group recovered bowel function more quickly than did the PCA group. Cardiopulmonary complications were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: After major abdominal surgery in the elderly patient, patient-controlled analgesia, regardless of the route (epidural or parenteral), is effective. The epidural route using local anesthetics and an opioid provides better pain relief and improves mental status and bowel activity.     

Durchgangssyndrome nach gefäßchirurgischen Operationen

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative delirium is a common psychic disturbance occurring acutely after various surgical procedures and typically presenting with a fluctuating course. These patients' recovery takes longer. In this study we analyze the incidence of postoperative delirium in patients undergoing vascular surgery and try to identify risk factors for its development. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective arterial operations were included. Their medical history, the specific vascular diagnosis and operation performed, the medication and laboratory data were monitored. Additionally the patients were preoperatively interviewed by a psychiatrist. Intraoperatively the drugs, infusions, possible transfusions, blood gases and pressures were monitored, as were the times of surgery and anesthesia. Postoperatively patients were seen daily by the psychiatrist and the surgeon for at least 7 days. Postoperative delirium was diagnosed according to DSM IV criteria, and mild, moderate and severe delirium were distinguished. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients entered the study. Twenty-one (38.9%) developed postoperative delirium (11 mild, 2 moderate, 8 severe). Patients with aortic operations developed delirium more frequently than those with non-aortic procedures(55.5 vs 22.2%, n = 27 each). Some preexisting diseases (hearing disturbance) increased the probability of postoperative delirium, while age was not identified as a risk factor. General psychopathological and depressive disturbances increased the likelihood of postoperative delirium. Patients who had a severe intraoperative course developed postoperative delirium more frequently. This was not seen in the absolute time of surgery or anesthesia nor in the intraoperative development of blood pressure or intraarterial gases, which did not differ between patients with and without postoperative delirium. More reliable parameters were an increased intraoperative need for crystalloid volume, intra- or postoperatively decreased hemoglobin values (Hb < 10 g/dl) and the development of acidosis that had to be treated. Patients with delirium had serious complications more often (8/21 = 38.1% vs 6/33 = 18.2%) and needed Intensive Care treatment longer (2.7 vs 2.1 days, only aortic surgery 3.2 vs 2.4 days). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative delirium after vascular surgery is frequent. Patients undergoing aortic surgery, with specific concomitant medical disease, psychopathological disturbances and a severe intraoperative course, are at risk of developing postoperative delirium.     

青年患者小手术后近期认知功能的变化

目的 探明青年患者小手术后近期认知功能的变化.方法 择期行脐部以下部位小手术(手术时间＜2 h)青年患者(18岁～39岁)60例,ASA Ⅰ～Ⅱ级,采用完全随机设计法分为全凭静脉麻醉组与硬膜外麻醉组各30例,对照组为青年健康志愿者30例.分别于术前1 d,术后3 d行6项认知功能测定.结果 完成全程测验60例,其中对照组21例,全麻组18例,硬膜外组21例.术后各项测验值普遍高于术前测验值(P＜0.05).全麻组和硬膜外组多项测验数值在术前和术后低于对照组(P＜0.05).按Z计分诊断术后第3天认知功能障碍(postoperative cognitive dysfunction,POCD)发生5例,其中对照组1例,全麻组3例,硬膜外组1例.组间差异无统计学意义(x2=2.338,P=0.31).结论 小手术青年患者在术前注意力已有所下降,术后注意力、记忆力和思维能力都有一定程度的受损.全身麻醉和硬膜外麻醉后近期各项认知功能的变化及POCD的发生率差异无统计学意义.     

The retroperitoneal approach combined with epidural anesthesia reduces morbidity in elective infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair

In elective open infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair the surgical approach and the use of epidural anesthesia (EDA) may determine patients' outcome. Hence we analyzed our results after elective open aneurysm repair in the light of the surgical approach and the use of EDA. Retrospective analysis of a prospective data base. From December 2005 to April 2008, 125 patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysm underwent elective open repair. Patients were divided into four groups: retro- and transperitoneal approach with and without epidural anesthesia (RP+/-EDA and TP+/-EDA). In terms of age, sex, aneurysm diameter, ASA score and clamping time all groups were comparable. In the retroperitoneal groups significantly more tube grafts were implanted (63 vs. 27; P=0.001). The rate of surgical complications did not differ between the groups. The RP+EDA group had the lowest rate of postoperative assisted mechanical ventilation (5.1% vs. 35.7%; P=0.002) and medical complications (17.9% vs. 42.8%; P=0.032). Concerning frequency of surgical complications, the retroperitoneal incision was comparable to the transperitoneal approach in infrarenal aortic reconstruction. Supplementation with EDA resulted in a decreased rate of postoperative assisted mechanical ventilation and in lower morbidity rates.     

Comparison of Intravenous or Epidural Patient-controlled Analgesia in the Elderly after Major Abdominal Surgery

Background: Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous morphine and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), using an opioid either alone or in combination with a local anesthetic, are two major advances in the management of pain after major surgery. However, these techniques have been evaluated poorly in elderly people. This prospective, randomized study compared the effectiveness on postoperative pain and safety of PCEA and PCA after major abdominal surgery in the elderly patient.

Methods: Seventy patients older than 70 yr of age and undergoing major abdominal surgery were assigned randomly to receive either combined epidural analgesia and general anesthesia followed by postoperative PCEA, using a mixture of 0.125% bupivacaine and sufentanil (PCEA group), or general anesthesia followed by PCA with intravenous morphine (PCA group). Pain intensity was tested three times daily using a visual analog scale. Postoperative evaluation included mental status, cardiorespiratory and gastrointestinal functions, and patient satisfaction scores.

Results: Pain relief was better at rest (P = 0.001) and after coughing (P = 0.002) in the PCEA group during the 5 postoperative days. Satisfaction scores were better in the PCEA group. Although incidence of delirium was comparable in the PCA and PCEA groups (24%vs. 26%, respectively), mental status was improved on the fourth and fifth postoperative days in the PCEA group. The PCEA group recovered bowel function more quickly than did the PCA group. Cardiopulmonary complications were similar in the two groups.     

Durchgangssyndrome nach gefäßchirurgischen Operationen Zwischenergebnisse einer prospektiven Untersuchung

Introduction: Postoperative delirium is a common psychic disturbance occurring acutely after various surgical procedures and typically presenting with a fluctuating course. These patients' recovery takes longer. In this study we analyze the incidence of postoperative delirium in patients undergoing vascular surgery and try to identify risk factors for its development. Methods: Patients undergoing elective arterial operations were included. Their medical history, the specific vascular diagnosis and operation performed, the medication and laboratory data were monitored. Additionally the patients were preoperatively interviewed by a psychiatrist. Intraoperatively the drugs, infusions, possible transfusions, blood gases and pressures were monitored, as were the times of surgery and anesthesia. Postoperatively patients were seen daily by the psychiatrist and the surgeon for at least 7 days. Postoperative delirium was diagnosed according to DSM IV criteria, and mild, moderate and severe delirium were distinguished. Results: Fifty-four patients entered the study. Twenty-one (38.9%) developed postoperative delirium (11 mild, 2 moderate, 8 severe). Patients with aortic operations developed delirium more frequently than those with non-aortic procedures(55.5 vs 22.2%, n=27 each). Some preexisting diseases (hearing disturbance) increased the probability of postoperative delirium, while age was not identified as a risk factor. General psychopathological and depressive disturbances increased the likelihood of postoperative delirium. Patients who had a severe intraoperative course developed postoperative delirium more frequently. This was not seen in the absolute time of surgery or anesthesia nor in the intraoperative development of blood pressure or intraarterial gases, which did not differ between patients with and without postoperative delirium. More reliable parameters were an increased intraoperative need for crystalloid volume, intra – or postoperatively decreased hemoglobin values (Hb <10 g/dl) and the development of acidosis that had to be treated. Patients with delirium had serious complications more often (8/21=38.1% vs 6/33=18.2%) and needed Intensive Care treatment longer (2.7 vs 2.1 days, only aortic surgery 3.2 vs 2.4 days). Conclusions: Postoperative delirium after vascular surgery is frequent. Patients undergoing aortic surgery, with specific concomittant medical disease, psychopathological disturbances and a severe intraoperative course, are at risk of developing postoperative delirium.     

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction in adult and elderly patients--general anesthesia vs subarachnoid or epidural analgesia

This study compared the effect of general anesthesia or regional vertebral analgesia (subarachnoid or epidural) on postoperative cognitive function in 60 young adult (group A) and 60 elderly (group E) patients undergoing orthopedic and urologic surgery. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised for cognitive functions assessment was done preoperatively, and postoperatively; one day and three days after surgery. Variations in heart rate, blood pressure, arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide tensions, and pH as well as serum bicarbonate, sodium and potassium levels, were assessed at the same time intervals. They did not show any significant change from the preoperative levels. Cognitive functions, one and three days after surgery, did not change significantly in young adult patients after either general or regional vertebral nor in elderly patients who received regional regional vertebral, as compared with the preoperative levels. Only elderly patients who received general anesthesia had significant decline in cognitive function one day after surgery. It significantly improved on the third postoperative day but still was significantly less than the preoperative level. Moreover, significantly better WAIS-R Scores were found in the elderly group one and three days after spinal anesthesia than after general anesthesia. The results indicate that general anesthesia poses a significant risk for the occurrence of early postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients that can persist for 3 day after surgery. Regional vertebral analgesia is advantageous over general anesthesia for elderly patients in terms of a better postoperative neuropsychological functioning.     

Postoperative cognitive disorders in the elderly

TWO DISTINCT CATEGORIES: Postoperative cognitive disorders include delirium and long-term cognitive dysfunction. DELERIUM: Delirium is an acute state occurring early during the postoperative period. It may be considered as an acute cerebral insufficiency which may be consecutive both to the negative effects of aging and chronic illness on cognitive function, and to the cerebral impact of operative stress. In addition, precipitating postoperative medical factors may facilitate cerebral failure. Only a few studies have been devoted to prevention programs aimed at reducing the risk of postoperative delirium. Nevertheless, we can hypothesize that a preoperative gerontology assessment would be effective in determining risk factors of delirium in old patients and thus enable proposing individual postoperative management. LONG-TERM COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION: The definition of this clinical picture is less precise than delirium. Long-term cognitive dysfunction corresponds to a loss of cognitive performance in the weeks and months after anesthesia. The IPOCD1 study conducted in a large cohort of elderly patients has shown that postoperative cognitive dysfunction was present in 25.8% of patients 1 week after surgery and in 9.9% 3 months after surgery. One to two years after surgery, cognitive dysfunction was observed in 10.4% of patients compared with 10.6% in a control population of non-operated patients. We would suggest that in many cases, postoperative cognitive dysfunction may result from preoperative dementia unmasked by surgery.     

Effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome: a randomized, controlled Veterans Affairs cooperative study

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that epidural anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia decrease the incidence of death and major complications during and after four types of intraabdominal surgical procedures. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Even though many beneficial aspects of epidural anesthesia have been reported, clinical trials of epidural anesthesia for outcome of surgical patients have shown conflicting results. METHODS: The authors studied 1,021 patients who required anesthesia for one of the intraabdominal aortic, gastric, biliary, or colon operations. They were assigned randomly to receive either general anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with parenteral opioids (group 1) or epidural plus light general anesthesia and postoperative epidural morphine (group 2). The patients were monitored for death and major complications during and for 30 days after surgery, as well as for postoperative pain, time of ambulation, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Overall, there was no significant difference in the incidence of death and major complications between the two groups. For abdominal aortic surgical patients, unlike the other three types of surgical patients, the overall incidence of death and major complications was significantly lower in group 2 patients (22%) than in group 1 patients (37%), stemming from differences in the incidence of new myocardial infarction, stroke, and respiratory failure between the two groups. Overall, group 2 patients received significantly less analgesic medication but had better pain relief than group 1 patients. In group 2 aortic patients, endotracheal intubation time was 13 hours shorter and surgical intensive care stay was 3.5 hours shorter. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of anesthetic and postoperative analgesic techniques on perioperative outcome varies with the type of operation performed. Overall, epidural analgesia provides better postoperative pain relief. Epidural anesthesia and epidural analgesia improve the overall outcome and shorten the intubation time and intensive care stay in patients undergoing abdominal aortic operations.     

Continuous epidural chloroprocaine after abdominal surgery is associated with lower postoperative opioid exposure in NICU infants

Background: Epidural anesthesia in infants undergoing open abdominal surgery has the potential to reduce opioid consumption, lower pain scores, and expedite tracheal extubation. We evaluated associations between use of continuous epidural chloroprocaine and improved intra- and post-operative outcomes.Methods: This matched retrospective cohort study first identified 24 patients who between April 2018 through December 2019 were treated with a caudal catheter and epidural chloroprocaine infusion for a laparotomy at postnatal age of 6 months or less. A matched comparator group of 24 patients was derived based on age and type of surgery. Exclusion criteria were the presence of a preoperative opioid infusion, comorbidities that would preclude appropriate pain assessment, or a recent surgical procedure. Primary outcomes included opioid consumption and pain scores; we secondarily analyzed intraoperative anesthetic requirements, other systemic analgesic use, vital signs, tracheal extubation time, and procedural times.Results: Treatment with epidural anesthesia was associated with lower 5-day total postoperative opioid consumption (3.2 mg/kg vs. 19.7 mg/kg in the respective epidural vs. systemic groups, p = 0.001) and time to tracheal extubation (1.3 days vs. 3.2 days, p = 0.005). Any statistically significant differences in pain scores were not clinically meaningful. There were no differences in mean arterial pressure or intraoperative inhaled anesthetic doses.Conclusion: Continuous infusion of epidural chloroprocaine in infants following open abdominal surgery may limit exposure to systemic opioid medications while providing adequate postoperative analgesia and shortening time to tracheal extubation.     

Cardiopulmonary complications after major surgery: a role for epidural analgesia?

Improvement in postoperative pulmonary mechanics with epidural analgesia has been described. Data on the hemodynamic effects of this technique are absent from the surgical literature. To provide such data we have evaluated two groups of patients undergoing aortic reconstruction: group I (n = 25), general anesthesia and group II (n = 6), general anesthesia with adjunctive epidural analgesia. The groups were comparable preoperatively as judged by the incidence of cardiac history, preoperative ejection fraction, and measured hemodynamic parameters. Postoperatively there were no significant differences in the pressure-related parameters; however, rate-related factors including heart rate and double product were significantly decreased in group II with no reduction in cardiac index. Postoperative increases in total body oxygen consumption were also markedly attenuated by epidural analgesia. Epidural analgesia reduces the hemodynamic demands on the heart after major surgery and is a useful adjunct, especially in patients with coronary artery disease.     

'Shared spinal cord' scenario: paraplegia following abdominal aortic surgery under combined general and epidural anaesthesia.

Serious neurological complications of abdominal aortic vascular surgery are rare but devastating for all involved. When epidural blockade is part of the anaesthetic technique such complications may be attributed to needles, catheters or drugs. We present a patient who developed paraplegia following an elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Continuous epidural blockade was part of the anaesthetic technique and postoperative analgesia. In this case the spinal cord damage was explained by ischaemia caused by the aortic surgery. This event has made us aware of a rare complication associated with abdominal aortic surgery and highlighted safety aspects of epidural anaesthesia in such patients.     

Recovery characteristics and post-operative delirium after long-duration laparoscope-assisted surgery in elderly patients: propofol-based vs. sevoflurane-based anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Post-operative mental dysfunction may be an important problem in elderly patients. This study was designed to compare the effects of propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia on recovery characteristics and the incidence of post-operative delirium (POD) in long-duration laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients. METHODS: Fifty ASA physical status I-II patients over the age of 65 scheduled for laparoscopic surgery lasting 3 h or more randomly received propofol (group P, n = 25) or sevoflurane (group S, n = 25) for both induction and maintenance of general anesthesia. Both groups were combined with continuous perioperative epidural analgesia. The level of primary anesthetics was adjusted to maintain changes in mean arterial pressure within 20% of the pre-anesthetic values. The emergence times from anesthesia (eye opening, extubation, response to command, and orientation) were recorded, and the occurrence of POD was assessed by the delirium rating scale (DRS) during the first 3 days after surgery. All patients received oxygen and continuous epidural analgesia postoperatively. RESULTS: Immediate emergence, i.e. eye opening and extubation was significantly faster after sevoflurane (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the incidences of POD in the two groups during the first 3 days after surgery. The scores for DRS on day 2 and 3 after surgery, however, were significantly higher in group P than in group S (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane may be preferable to propofol for general anesthesia in combination with epidural analgesia with respect to less effect on mental function during the early postoperative period for long-duration laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients.     

Prospective Evaluation of the Defecatory Functional Results in Patients Following Aorto-Aortic Reconstruction Surgery for an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Purpose Anterior rectal resections have been associated with postoperative bowel function abnormalities, a condition defined as anterior resection syndrome. Autonomic denervation could be one of the possible mechanisms underlying this complication. Damage to the preaortic tissue containing autonomic nervous plexus during abdominal aortic reconstruction surgery may affect the anorectal defecation function. Methods The anorectal function was prospectively studied in 22 patients undergoing abdominal aortic reconstruction surgery. The patients were examined preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively by symptom-specific questionnaires. Results Postoperatively, the patients showed no significant impairment of the anorectal functions in both constipation- and fecal incontinence-specific questionnaires. Self-estimation of the defecatory function was slightly lower compared with preoperative scores. Conclusion An injury to the intermesenteric, inferior mesenteric, and superior hypogastric plexuses does not significantly influence the defecatory functions in patients following abdominal reconstruction surgery for an abdominal aortic aneurysm.     

Cardiac risk stratification in patients undergoing endoluminal graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a single-institution experience with 365 patients

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair have a high incidence of coexisting cardiac disease. The traditional cardiac risk stratification for open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery may not apply to patients undergoing endoluminal graft exclusion. The purpose of this study was to examine predictive risk factors for perioperative cardiac events. METHODS: As part of multiple prospective endograft trials approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, data for 365 patients who underwent endoluminal graft repair from 1996 to 2001 were collected. Variables included for analysis were age and sex; history of smoking; presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or renal insufficiency; Eagle clinical cardiac risk factors; American Society of Anesthesiologists index; type of anesthesia administered; estimated blood loss; preoperative hemoglobin level; preoperative use of beta-blocker therapy; duration of surgery; need for iliac artery conduit; and concomitant other vascular procedures. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine which variables were predictive of an adverse perioperative cardiac event, eg, Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), severe arrhythmia, and unstable angina. RESULTS: The study cohort included 322 men and 43 women (mean age, 74.2 years). Fifty-two (14.2%) postoperative cardiac events occurred: severe dysrhythmia in 15 patients (4.1%), MI in 14 patients (3.8%), non-Q wave MI in 8 patients (2.2%), CHF in 8 patients (2.2%), and unstable angina in 7 patients (1.9%). Univariate analysis demonstrated that age 70 years or older (P =.034), history of MI (P =.018), angina (P =.004), history of CHF (P <.001), two or more Eagle risk factors (P <.001), and lack of use of preoperative beta-blocker therapy (P =.005) were predictors of perioperative cardiac events. Multivariate analysis identified only age 70 years or older (P =.026), history of MI (P =.024) or CHF (P =.001), and lack of use of preoperative beta-blocker therapy (P =.007) as independent risk factors for an adverse cardiac event. CONCLUSIONS: Age 70 years or older, history of MI or CHF, and lack of use of preoperative beta-blocker therapy are independent risk factors for perioperative cardiac events in patients undergoing endoluminal graft repair.     

Endovascular stent grafts as a safe secondary option for para-anastomotic abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience of endovascular repair of para-anastomotic aortic aneurysm. METHODS AND RESULTS: From March 2001 to December 2004 we identified 6 patients with a para-anastomotic aortic aneurysms following previous open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. All patients were treated with endovascular surgery under epidural anaesthesia. There were no major complications, surgical conversions or deaths. Four patients received a bifurcated aortic stent-graft, and two an aorto-uniliac stent-graft followed by a femoro-femoral bypass. At follow-up (mean 26.1+/-10.2 months) there were no deaths, endoleaks or graft migrations observed. CONCLUSION: Endovascular surgery, avoiding general anesthesia and re-laparotomy, is the ideal technique for treatment of this complication resulting from failed primary conventional AAA repair.