Risk of pregnancy-related venous thrombosis in carriers of severe inherited thrombophilia

Homozygous carriers of factor V Leiden have an approximately 80-fold increased risk of venous thrombosis. Also double heterozygous carriers of both the factor V Leiden and the prothrombin gene mutations are at high thrombotic risk. The magnitude of the risk of venous thrombosis in pregnant women with the two severe thrombophilic conditions has not been estimated so far. We performed a multicenter retrospective family study in women with homozygous factor V Leiden, double heterozygous factor V Leiden and the prothrombin gene mutation, and women with normal coagulation. Only relatives of index patients with thrombosis formed the study cohort. Fifteen homozygous and 39 double heterozygous women were compared to 182 women with normal coagulation. Venous thrombosis occurred in 3 of 19, 2 of 50 and 1 of 221 pregnancies, respectively. One thrombotic episode occurred in the third trimester, the remaining 5 in the postpartum. The prevalence of venous thrombosis was 15.8% (95% CI 3.4-39.6) for homozygotes. 4.0% (95% CI 0.5-13.7) for double heterozygotes and 0.5% for women with normal coagulation. The relative risk of pregnancy-related venous thrombosis was 41.3 (95% CI 4.1-419.7) for homozygous and 9.2 (95% CI 0.8-103.2) for double heterozygous carriers. In conclusion, homozygous carriers of factor V Leiden and, to a lesser extent, double heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden and of the prothrombin mutation have an increased risk of venous thrombosis during pregnancy, particularly high during the postpartum period. On the basis of these findings we recommend that these women receive anticoagulant prophylaxis at least in the postpartum, that should perhaps be extended to the whole pregnancy in homozygous carriers.     

Inherited thrombophilia and first venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and puerperium

Venous thromboembolism is a rare but threatening complication of pregnancy. Little conclusive information is available on the actual risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or puerperium in women with inherited thrombophilia, particularly in carriers of factor V Leiden and of the G20210A prothrombin gene mutation. To determine the pregnancy-related and puerperium-related risk of venous thromboembolism in women with inherited thrombophilia, we performed a case-control study on 119 women who had a first episode of deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism during pregnancy or puerperium and 232 healthy women who had at least one pregnancy without thrombosis. Inherited thrombophilia was diagnosed in 47 patients (39.5%) and 15 controls (6.5%). The relative risk of venous thromboembolism was 10.6 (95% CI, 5.6-20.4) for heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden, 2.9 (95% CI, 1.0-8.6) for heterozygous carriers of the prothrombin mutation and 13.1 (95% CI, 5.0-34.2) for those with antithrombin, protein C or protein S deficiency taken together. Sixty-eight of the 119 women (57%) had thrombosis after delivery, confirming the puerperium as a particularly high-risk period. When women were divided into two groups of those with antenatal or postnatal thrombosis. the relative risks associated with each type of inherited thrombophilia were of similar magnitude. In conclusion, women with inherited thrombophilia have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy. Among thrombophilic abnormalities, the prothrombin mutation was the weakest risk factor. Thrombosis occurred more frequently in puerperium than in pregnancy, whether or not thrombophilia was diagnosed.     

Combined effect of factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210A on the risk of venous thromboembolism--pooled analysis of 8 case-control studies including 2310 cases and 3204 controls. Study Group for Pooled-Analysis in Venous Thromboembolism

Factor V Leiden and factor II G20210A mutations are two frequent genetic risk factors involved in venous thromboembolism (VTE). The goal of this pooled analysis of 8 case-control studies, comprising a total of 2310 cases and 3204 controls, was to precisely estimate the risk of VTE in patients bearing both mutations (double heterozygotes). Odds ratios for VTE were 4.9 (95% CI; 4.1-5.9) for the factor V Leiden and 3.8 (3.0-4.9) for the factor II G20210A mutation. Fifty-one cases (2.2%) and none of the controls were double heterozygotes. The odds ratio for venous thrombosis in double heterozygotes was 20.0 (11.1-36.1). Twelve percent of patients heterozygous for factor V Leiden were also heterozygous for factor II G20210A and conversely 23% of patients heterozygous for factor II G20210A were also heterozygous for factor V Leiden. Furthermore, in this large population we analyzed the effect of oral contraceptive (OC) in women carrying one of these mutations. Odds ratio for VTE associated with OC was 2.29 (1.72-3.04). In factor V Leiden carriers using OC, the odds ratio for VTE was 10.25 (5.69-1 8.45). The odds ratio of the association of factor II mutation and OC use was 7.14 (3.39-15.04). Finally, we also confirmed that the frequency of factor V Leiden was lower in patients with pulmonary embolism than in patients with deep vein thrombosis without PE (odds ratio 0.69). Conversely, factor II G20210A mutation was equally balanced in both patient groups.     

Venous thrombosis, oral contraceptives and high factor VIII levels.

Recently, it has been described that elevated plasma levels of factor VIII are a strong risk factor for venous thrombosis. We analysed the data of the Leiden Thrombophilia Study, a population based case-control study on the causes of venous thrombosis, to verify whether the risk due to oral contraceptive use was higher in women with higher factor VIII levels. Furthermore we investigated the joint risk of high factor VIII levels and oral contraceptive use. We selected 155 premenopausal women with deep-vein thrombosis and 169 control subjects, aged 15-49, who were at the time of their thrombosis (or similar date in control) not pregnant, nor in the puerperium, did not have a recent miscarriage, and were not using injectable progestogens. Of the patients, 109 (70%) women had used oral contraceptives during the month preceding their deep-vein thrombosis, in contrast to 65 (38%) of the control subjects (index date), yielding an odds ratio for oral contraceptive use of 3.8 (95% CI 2.4-6.0). Of the women who suffered a deep-vein thrombosis 56 (36%) had high factor VIII levels (> or =150 IU/dl) as compared with 29 (17%) of the control subjects, yielding an odds ratio for high factor VIII of 4.0 (95% CI 2.0-8.0), relative to factor VIII levels <100 IU/dl. The joint effect of oral contraceptive use and high factor VIII resulted in an odds ratio of 10.3 (95% CI 3.7-28.9), comparing women who had both with women who had neither. We conclude that there is an increase in risk due to oral contraceptive use in women with higher factor VIII levels and that both factors have additive effects.     

The factor VIII D1241E polymorphism is associated with decreased factor VIII activity and not with activated protein C resistance levels

Elevated factor VIII (FVIII) levels are a recognized risk factor for venous thrombosis. Recently, family studies suggested that the G allele of the 3951C/G (D1241E) FVIII polymorphism is associated to lower FVIII activity. We investigated in case-control studies both biological effects (FVIII levels and activated protein C sensitivity ratio) and clinical associations (venous thromboembolism) of the D1241E change. Among 145 healthy and 150 thrombotic women, not carriers of known thrombophilic defects, the 1241E allele was associated with 11% reduced (t-test, P<0.05) FVIII levels. The effect on activated protein C sensitivity ratio was not statistically significant. Carriership of the 1241E allele, potentially conferring protection from thrombosis, was found in 22.8% of controls and in 15.3% of cases. In an additional cohort of factor V Leiden carriers (n=283), carriership of the 1241E allele was 25.2% among 143 asymptomatic subjects and 17.1% among 140 thrombotic patients. Our data do not indicate a specific interaction with factor V Leiden. These genotype distributions suggest a mild protective effect from venous thrombosis conferred by 1241E FVIII, masked by other genetic and/or environmental components, and detectable only in very large population studies. Our findings point toward the presence of genetic determinant of coagulation factor levels with a biologically significant role, but with a poor predictive value to estimate thrombotic risk beyond established risk factors.     

Is the prevalence of the factor V Leiden mutation in patients with pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis really different?

INTRODUCTION: Previous investigations have suggested a lower prevalence of the factor V Leiden mutation in patients with pulmonary embolism, as compared to patients with deep leg vein thrombosis. METHODS: We studied unselected patients with pulmonary embolism, in whom we also assessed the presence of deep vein thrombosis by ultrasonography. We assessed the prevalence of heterozygosity for the factor V Leiden mutation and compared the outcome of patients with a normal ultrasound (primary pulmonary embolism) to those with an abnormal ultrasound (combined form of venous thromboembolism). Furthermore, we performed a literature search to identify all articles regarding the prevalence of heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation in patients with primary deep vein thrombosis, primary pulmonary embolism and a combined form of venous thromboembolism. We calculated a (common) odds ratio for these 3 manifestations of venous thromboembolism, including the current findings. RESULTS: In 92 patients with proven pulmonary embolism, 25 (27%) had also an abnormal ultrasound. In these patients, the prevalence of the factor V Leiden mutation was 24% (95% CI 9%-45%), whereas the mutation was present in 5 of 67 patients with primary pulmonary embolism (7%; 95% CI 2%-16%). The literature analysis indicated the common odds ratio for the presence of heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation in patients with primary deep vein thrombosis, primary pulmonary embolism and the combined form of venous thromboembolism to be 7.9 (95% CI 5-12), 3.5 (95% CI 2-6) and 6.8 (95% CI 3-14), respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with primary pulmonary embolism the prevalence of the factor V Leiden mutation appears to be half of that reported in patients with primary deep vein thrombosis. The mechanism remains unclear.     

The risk of fetal loss in family members of probands with factor V Leiden mutation.

In order to investigate the risk of fetal loss in carriers of factor V Leiden who are family members of probands with this mutation, we performed a retrospective cohort study including 109 women who had been pregnant at least once and were family members of 61 probands with venous thromboembolism and a single identified factor V Leiden mutation. The rate of pregnancies ending in unexplained fetal loss, early miscarriage, late miscarriage or stillbirth in women with the factor V Leiden was compared with that of women with normal genotype. In the 65 women who were carriers of factor V Leiden 31 of the 191 pregnancies (16.2% per pregnancy) resulted in unexplained fetal loss, as compared to 13 of the 121 pregnancies (10.7% per pregnancy) in the 44 non-carriers (relative risk, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.8-3.2). After the first trimester of pregnancy, 25 pregnancies (13.1% per pregnancy) among carriers of factor V Leiden ended in fetal loss, as compared to 7 (5.8% per pregnancy) among females with normal genotype (relative risk, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.01 to 5.1). We conclude that carriers of factor V Leiden who are family members of probands with this mutation have a statistically significant and clinically important risk of late miscarriage or stillbirth. Studies addressing the benefit-to-risk ratio of adopting routinary thromboprophylactic measures following the first trimester of pregnancy in these women are strongly indicated.     

Factor V Leiden mutation and pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism: what is the exact risk? Results from a meta-analysis

The magnitude of the association of factor V Leiden mutation with pregnancy-related venous thrombosis remains unclear. Our objective was to undertake a systematic review and a metaanalysis of the literature to estimate precisely the association of factorV Leiden mutation with the risk of first, or recurrent, pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism. Studies published before October 2005 were identified by Medline((R)). Using both fixed and random effect models, odds ratios (OR) with accompanying 95% confidential intervals (CI) were calculated for the factor V Leiden mutation and the clinical end-point (Yusuf-Peto adaptation of the Mantel-Haenszel, DerSimonian and Laird method). We identified 13 studies including 7 cohorts and 6 casecontrol studies relating to factor V Leiden and pregnancy-related venous thrombosis. The results from the cohorts showed a pooled OR of 4.46 (95% CI, 1.82-10.94; 7,879 pooled women), with no evidence of statistical heterogeneity (p = 0.36), for the risk of a first venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or the postpartum period associated with the factor V Leiden mutation. Case-control studies revealed a higher risk (OR 8.6, 95% CI, 5.85-12.63; 1,433 [corrected] pooled women) with significant heterogeneity (p < 0.005). Because of insufficient data, an analysis for the risk of recurrence could not be performed. Our findings emphasize the fact that limited data are available on this topic. This meta-analysis provides clinicians with an estimate of the average risk of a first thrombosis occurring during pregnancy in women carrying the factor V Leiden to assist the management of such women.     

Risk factors for venous thrombosis in the black population

Risk factors for venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) in the black population are poorly characterized. Of 142 black cases tested a genetic cause was identified in only 9.1%: 4.2% had protein C deficiency, 2.8% protein S deficiency, 0.7% antithrombin deficiency and 1.4% were heterozygous for FV Leiden. We hypothesised that elevated factor VIII levels constitute a candidate risk factor for venous thrombosis in the black population. Factor VIII (FVIII:C) levels were determined in 100 black patients with VTE and 100 black controls in a case-control study. Of the patients 34% had a FVIII:C above 228 IU/dL (the 90th centile value in normal blacks) compared to 10% controls. Relative to those with FVIII:C below this value, odds ratio (OR) for risk of VTE was 4.64 (95% CI 2.02-10.85). When FVIII:C below 150 IU/dL was used as a comparator, OR was 11.1 (95% CI 4.29-29.43). There was evidence for a dose-response relationship. We propose that raised FVIII:C is a major risk factor for VTE in black subjects with prevalence and odds ratio exceeding those reported for white subjects.     

Haplotypes encoding the factor VIII 1241 Glu variation, factor VIII levels and the risk of venous thrombosis

Levels of factor VIII (FVIII) are associated with the risk of venous thrombosis. The FVIII variation D1241E has been reported to be associated with decreased levels of FVIII. Our objective was to study whether D1241E is associated with levels of FVIII and the risk of venous thrombosis and whether this association is caused by D1241E or another linked variation. We analyzed the association of three FVIII gene haplotypes encoding 1241E (further denoted as HT1, HT3, and HT5) with FVIII levels and thrombosis risk. This analysis was performed in the Leiden Thrombophilia Study (LETS). The control populations of two case-controls studies on arterial thrombosis in men and women, respectively, were used to confirm the effects observed on FVIII:C in the LETS. In men, HT1 was associated with a 6% reduction in FVIII:C and with a reduced risk of venous thrombosis [odds ratio 0.4 (CI95 0.2-0.8)]. Logistic regression showed that the risk reduction was only partially dependent of the reduction in FVIII levels. HT1 showed no effects in women on either FVIII:C or risk of thrombosis. The number of carriers of HT3 and HT5 was too low to make an accurate estimate of the risk of venous thrombosis. Neither HT3 nor HT5 showed effects on levels of FVIII:C. When we consider that all three haplotypes encoding 1241E show different effects on FVIII:C and thrombosis risk, it is possible that D1241E is not the functional variation. However, FVIII gene variations do contribute to both levels of FVIII and the risk of thrombosis.     

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in families with inherited thrombophilia

The risk of spontaneous or risk-period related venous thromboembolism in family members of symptomatic carriers of antithrombin (AT), protein C (PC) or protein S (PS) defects, as well as of the Factor V Leiden mutation is still undefined. We performed a retrospective cohort study in family members (n = 793) of unselected patients with a documented venous thromboembolism and one of these deficiencies to make an estimate of this risk. The annual incidences of total and spontaneous venous thromboembolic events in carriers of AT, PC or PS defects (n = 181) were 1.01% and 0.40%, respectively, as compared to 0.10% and 0.04% in non-carriers, respectively (relative risks both 10.6). In carriers of Factor V Leiden (n = 224), the annual incidences of total and spontaneous venous thromboembolism were 0.28% and 0.11%, respectively, as compared to 0.09% and 0.04% in non-carriers, respectively (relative risks 2.8 and 2.5). Additional risk factors (immobilisation, surgery and trauma: oral contraceptive use; and pregnancy/ post-partum) increased the risk of thrombosis in carriers of AT, PC and PS defects as compared to non-carriers (relative risks 8.3, 6.4 and 8.2, respectively). Oral contraceptive use and pregnancy/ post-partum period increased the risk of thrombosis in carriers of Factor V Leiden to 3.3-fold and 4.2-fold, respectively, whereas other risk factors had only a minor effect. These data lend some support to the practice of screening family members of symptomatic carriers of a AT, PC and PS deficiency. For family members of symptomatic carriers of Factor V Leiden, screening does not seem to be justified except for women in fertile age.     

Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy is not associated with persistent elevated activated protein C (APC) sensitivity ratio based on the endogenous thrombin potential

Women who are using oral contraceptives can acquire APC resistance, measured by the effect of APC on the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP). The objective of our study was to examine whether persistentAPC resistance determined with an ETP-based normalized APC sensitivity ratio (nAPCsr) is a risk marker for venous thromboembolism in women with pregnancy-associated thromboembolism. We determined the activities of antithrombin, protein C, protein S, and performed a genetic analysis of factor V Leiden G1691A, prothrombin mutation G20210A, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutation (MTHFR C677T) in 65 women with venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or the puerperium and in 114 normal women. A significantly (p<0.05) higher nAPCsr was present in normal women using hormones, in younger women (相似文献   

Effect of prothrombin 19911 A>G polymorphism on the risk of cerebral sinus‐venous thrombosis

Background and Purpose: The A>G polymorphism at position 19911 of the prothrombin gene is associated with a mildly increased risk of venous thromboembolism, alone or in association with such common thrombophilia mutations as factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210 GA. Its role in cerebral sinus‐venous thrombosis (CSVT) is not known. Methods: The presence of prothrombin 19911 A>G was investigated in a case–control study of 107 patients with cerebral thrombosis and factor V Leiden (n = 25), prothrombin 20210 GA (n = 47), without known thrombophilia (n = 35) and 842 healthy individuals with the corresponding coagulation profile. Results: Prothrombin 19911 A>G did not increase the risk of CSVT in carriers of factor V Leiden (adjusted odds ratio 1.6, 95%CI 0.6–4.7), prothrombin 20210 GA (odds ratio 1.1, 95%CI 0.6–2.2), nor in patients without known thrombophilia (odds ratio 1.3, 95%CI 0.5–3.1). Conclusions: Prothrombin 19911 A>G polymorphism does not appear to be a risk factor for CSVT, alone or in association with factor V Leiden or prothrombin 20210GA.     

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) regulates factor X activation. Low TFPI is a risk factor for a first venous thrombosis. We evaluated whether low TFPI confers an increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). TFPI-free antigen was measured in 611 patients with a first spontaneous VTE, and who were prospectively followed after withdrawal of anticoagulation. The endpoint was symptomatic recurrent VTE. The relative risk (RR) of recurrence increased from 1.0 (95% CI 0.4-2.6) in patients with TFPI levels < or = 5th percentile to 2.7 (95% CI 1.0-7.4) in patients with levels < or = 2nd percentile as compared with higher levels. At five years, the probability of recurrence was 48.6% (95th CI 19.0-78.1) among patients with TFPI < or = 2nd percentile and 16.8% (95th CI 13.8-19.8) among those with higher levels (p=0.04). Compared to patients with wild type factor V and high TFPI, the RR of recurrence was 1.1 (95% CI 0.7-1.7) in patients with factor V Leiden and high TFPI, 2.3 (95% CI 0.6-9.5) in patients with wild type factor V and low TFPI and 3.5 (95% CI 0.9-14.3) in patients with factor V Leiden and low TFPI. In a multivariate analysis,the high risk of recurrence in carriers of factor V Leiden and low TFPI slightly decreased [RR 2.8 (95% CI 0.6-9.5)]. We conclude that thrombosis patients with low levels of free TFPI are at an increased risk of recurrent VTE.     

Increased activation of blood coagulation in pregnant women with the Factor V Leiden mutation

Background

The risk of venous thromboembolism is enhanced in pregnant carriers of the Factor V Leiden mutation. The primary aim of the study was to compare prothrombin fragments 1 + 2, soluble fibrin and D-dimer levels in pregnant Factor V Leiden mutation carriers with those in non-carriers. Secondary aims were to evaluate whether these biomarkers could predict placenta-mediated complications or venous thromboembolism, and to study blood coagulation after caesarean section with thromboprophylaxis and after vaginal delivery without thromboprophylaxis.

Material/Methods

Prothrombin fragments 1 + 2, soluble fibrin and D-dimer levels were studied longitudinally in 476 carriers with singleton pregnancies from gestational weeks 23–25 until 8–10 weeks postpartum.

Results

Prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 and D-dimer levels gradually increased during pregnancy. D-dimer levels were higher in carriers, both during pregnancy and puerperium, compared to non-carriers. D-dimer levels above 0.5 mg/l were found in about 30% and 20% of the heterozygous carriers at 4–5 and 8–10 weeks postpartum, respectively. Soluble fibrin levels were mainly unchanged during pregnancy, with no difference between carriers and non-carriers. Biomarker levels were similar in carriers with uncomplicated and complicated pregnancies.

Conclusion

Higher D-dimer levels indicate increased blood coagulation and fibrinolysis activity in carriers. The high proportion of carriers with D-dimer levels exceeding 0.5 mg/l postpartum must be considered when assessing the probability of venous thromboembolism. Large overlaps in biomarker levels in normal and complicated pregnancies suggest that these biomarkers cannot be used as predictors. Thromboprophylaxis following caesarean section may prevent increased activation of blood coagulation.     

The impact of dalteparin (Fragmin) on thrombin generation in pregnant women with venous thromboembolism: significance of the factor V Leiden mutation

Hypercoagulability is observed in patients with inherited thrombophilia, e.g. factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation. Pregnancy represents a hypercoagulable state as well. This study addresses the effects of the FVL mutation on haemostatic activation during pregnancy as indicated by prothrombin fragments (F1+2). 233 pregnant women with no history of venous thromboembolism were studied. Additionally, two patient groups (25 pregnant FVL carriers and 36 pregnant women without thrombophilic diathesis) in whom low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin) was used prophylactically against rethrombosis were investigated. None of the women developed clinical signs of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or after delivery. Untreated women exhibited substantial hypercoagulability. F1+2 levels were similar in FVL carriers and non-carriers (difference n. s.). After sufficient adjustment for anti-factor Xa activity (> or =0.15; < or =0.4 U/mL), heparinized women without any thrombophilic diathesis had significantly lower levels of F1+2 than untreated pregnant women. This was evident only in the first and second trimenon (p <0.001). F1+2 levels in heparinized FVL carriers were quite similar to the levels observed in untreated pregnant women, however. In conclusion, our data support the thesis that in comparison to asymptomatic patients, thrombin generation is exaggerated in symptomatic FVL carriers. Coagulation activation during pregnancy can be reduced by dalteparin.     

The ACE D/D genotype is protective against the development of idiopathic deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

The deletion/deletion (D/D) genotype of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) has been purported to be a risk for post-operative thrombosis.This D/D genotype has not been evaluated as a risk factor for idiopathic venous thromboembolism (VTE). The primary objective of the present study was to determine whether the D/D genotype of ACE is independently associated with the occurrence of idiopathic venous thromboembolic disease. We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with at least one objectively confirmed idiopathic VTE. Friends of cases were recruited as controls and matched to cases by sex, ethnicity, and age. Patients were tested for the ACE I/D polymorphism in addition to factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, and factor VIII levels. Three hundred cases and 300 controls were enrolled; 97% were Caucasian. There were 148 females and 152 males in each group with a mean age of 56.21 years (SD = 15.33). The ACE D/D genotype was present in 25.3% of cases and 32.4% of controls for an adjusted odds ratio of 0.66 (95% CI = 0.433 to 0.997). We can conclude that the ACE D/D genotype is protective against idiopathic venous thromboembolism.     

Procarboxypeptidase U (TAFI) contributes to the risk of thrombosis in patients with hereditary thrombophilia

IntroductionIt is considered that high plasma levels of procarboxypeptidase U (proCPU or TAFI) can promote the development of thrombosis, but data comparing proCPU levels in thrombophilia carriers and healthy subjects are rather scarce. Moreover, the results of previous studies on the risk of thrombosis related to high proCPU concentration in this population were not consistent. Although the 325 polymorphism of proCPU has a significant effect on the CPU half-life, it's influence on the risk of thrombosis or spontaneous pregnancy loss in carriers of hereditary thrombophilia is not clear.Materials and MethodsThe study population consisted of 144 thrombophilic patients (94 heterozygous and 10 homozygous carriers of FV Leiden, 26 heterozygous carriers of the prothrombin G20210A variation and 14 double carriers of FV Leiden and FII variation) and 69 healthy controls.ResultsThe results show that patients with inherited thrombophilia have a tendency toward lower mean proCPU plasma levels compared to healthy controls, however, this difference was only significant in carriers of FII G20210A (p = 0.014). A higher frequency of the most stable Ile325Ile proCPU was seen among carriers of FII G20210A mutation compared to the control group (19% vs 7%; p = 0.186).In the second part of the study proCPU as a risk factor for thrombosis was evaluated. In heterozygous carriers of FV Leiden or FII G20210A high levels of proCPU conferred to an almost 4-fold increased risk for spontaneous onset thrombosis. The more stable Ile325Ile proCPU seems to impose a higher risk for clinical manifestation of the thrombophilic condition. Finally, a significant positive correlation between F1+2 and proCPU concentration was seen.ConclusionThe increased risk of thrombosis in thrombophilia patients is not only ascribable to an increased thrombin generation, but also high levels of proCPU and the presence of the 325Ile genotype tip the balance towards thrombotic tendency even further.     

Factor V gene A4070G mutation and the risk of cerebral veno-sinus thrombosis occurring during puerperium

INTRODUCTION: Cerebral veno-sinus thrombosis (CVT) occurring during puerperium is a common form of stroke in young women in India, associated with high mortality and morbidity. Genetic polymorphisms involving coagulation factors are considered to be risk factors for thrombosis. A recently identified polymorphism in factor V gene, A4070G (R2 allele), has been reported as a risk factor for venous thrombosis in some studies. Moreover, the R2 allele has been reported to increase factor V Leiden-related thrombosis risk in doubly heterozygous individuals. The risk associated with the R2 allele has not yet been evaluated in CVT. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of factor V A4070G mutation in Indians and examine its role as a possible risk factor for CVT occurring during puerperium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated 50 patients with puerperal CVT and 100 healthy women with no post-partum complications for factor V A4070G and G1691A (factor V Leiden) polymorphisms using polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Among cases, 6 (12%) were heterozygous for the factor V A4070G mutation and none were homozygous. In the control group, 9 (9%) were heterozygous and 3 (3%) were homozygous. The odds ratio was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.31-3.13, p=1.000), suggesting that the risk for CVT was not increased in the presence of the R2 allele. There was no co-inheritance of factor V A4070G with factor V G1691A in any of the subjects. Our study shows that the A4070G mutation in factor V though highly prevalent in the Indian population is not associated with an increased risk of CVT occurring during puerperium in Indian women.     

Markers of activated coagulation in patients with factor V Leiden and/or G20210A prothrombin gene mutation

The activated protein C (APC) resistance phenotype associated with an abnormal factor V Leiden (FVL), and the G20210A prothrombin gene mutation are the most common findings in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). In a group of 210 patients, we compared the levels of markers of coagulation activation in carriers of FVL (71 heterozygous, 30 homozygous), G20210A prothrombin mutation (88 heterozygous) or both mutations combined (21 heterozygous), in order to assess whether these markers allow identification of a group of patients with a higher risk of thrombosis; they were also compared to normal values. A total of 143 patients had a personal history of VTE and 67 were asymptomatic. None of them had other hereditary causes of thrombophilia or an antiphospholipid syndrome. None were currently treated with either anticoagulant or hormonal treatment. Pregnant women were excluded.No significant difference between the four groups of patients could be found in the levels of F1+2, TAT and DDI. Levels were all significantly higher than the control values (p<0.05).The levels of F1+2 and TAT were similar in patients with or without a history of VTE, regardless of the type of mutation. DDI levels were significantly higher in patients with a history of VTE than in asymptomatic subjects (443+/-248 vs. 333+/-222 ng/ml, p=0.02) but with only 57% sensitivity and specificity. In conclusion, our study confirms the hypercoagulable state found in mutation carriers and points out the inability of F1+2 and TAT assays to identify a group of subjects at higher risk of thrombosis, within carriers of genetic risk factors. Although the sensitivity and specificity of DDI assay are low, high DDI concentrations tend to be associated with the risk of VTE.