Uric acid and transplantation

Hyperuricemia is a common complication in organ transplant recipients, and frequently is associated with chronic cyclosporine immunosuppressive therapy. Kidney and heart transplant recipients are prone to develop posttransplant hyperuricemia. Risk factors for hyperuricemia include decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR), diuretic use, and preexistent history of hyperuricemia. The influence of hyperuricemia in patient and graft survival is unclear because uric acid is not usually considered a common risk factor for cardiovascular disease that affects graft and patient survival. However, there have been small studies that have suggested that control of uric acid levels contributes to recovery of renal function (in heart and liver transplant recipients) and in an improvement in GFR in renal transplant recipients. Despite controversies in the need for hyperuricemia treatment in transplant patients, strategies to decrease uric acid levels includes a decrease or avoidance of cyclosporine treatment, adequacy of antihypertension treatment, avoidance of diuretics, nutritional management, and use of uric acid-decreasing agents. In this article we review the incidence and risk factors for the development of posttransplant hyperuricemia, discuss the influence of different immunosuppressive agents on uric acid metabolism, and suggest some alternative treatments for posttransplant hyperuricemia. We also consider that uric acid should be considered as a potential risk factor for renal allograft nephropathy or for renal dysfunction in nonrenal transplant recipients, as well as a comorbid factor for a decrease in patient and graft survival.     

Effect of Oral Fructose Load on Serum Uric Acid and Lipids in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated With Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus

Hyperuricemia, frequently observed following kidney transplantation, may adversely affect graft survival. Although hyperuricemia is a well-known adverse effect of cyclosporine (CsA), a similar effect of tacrolimus (Tac) remains debatable. Hyperuricemia is also seen after oral fructose intake in beverages and processed foods. This sugar is blamed for the epidemic of obesity and metabolic syndrome. The aim of our study was to compare the effects of CsA and Tac on an acute oral fructose load in terms of plasma uric acid, serum lipids, and blood pressure in kidney transplant patients. Thirty-two kidney transplant recipients treated with CsA- or Tac-based triple (calcineurin inhibitor + mycophenolate mofetil + prednisone) immunosuppressive therapy displaying stable allograft function (mean glomerular filtration rate = 53 mL/min/1.73m²) received an oral challenge with 70 g of fructose. Serum uric acid, lipids, and blood pressure were measured before as well as 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after fructose administration. A significant increase in serum uric acid was observed in both groups after oral fructose administration (P < .001). A peak increase in serum uric acid was recorded at 120 minutes after fructose intake. Serum total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol also significantly decreased and serum triglycerides increased to a similar extent in both CsA and Tac groups. No significant changes in blood pressure were observed after fructose consumption. Oral fructose intake induced an acute rise in serum uric acid and triglycerides and decrease in serum cholesterol among kidney transplant recipients. Those changes were similar among patients treated with CsA or Tac.     

Calcineurin nephrotoxicity

Calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, have improved allograft survival in solid organ transplantation. Indeed, they have reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes of cadaveric allograft recipients. Although marked progression has been made in initial survival rates, long-term kidney graft survival has yet to show such encouraging results. Chronic allograft dysfunction is the major hindrance to long-term graft survival and many components contribute to this entity, both immunologic and nonimmunologic. Chronic calcineurin nephrotoxicity is a major factor in chronic allograft dysfunction. This review will highlight the current understanding and management of calcineurin nephrotoxicity in kidney transplantation.     

Kidney transplantation with sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression: 5-year results of a randomized prospective trial compared to calcineurin inhibitor drugs

BACKGROUND: We report the 5-year outcomes from a randomized prospective trial in primary adult renal allograft recipients, designed to evaluate calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free immunosuppression on kidney transplant function. METHODS: Sixty-one patients were randomized to either sirolimus (n=31) or cyclosporine (n=30) after basiliximab induction and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with steroids. Sirolimus was concentration controlled at 10-12 ng/mL for at least 6 months. RESULTS: After 5 years, sirolimus-MMF-steroids compared to cyclosporine-MMF-steroids provides similar patient survival (87.1 vs. 90%, P=0.681), acute rejection rates (12.9 vs. 23.3%, P=0.22), total cholesterol (209.1 vs. 204.3 mg/dL, P=0.973), urine protein/creatinine ratios (0.398 vs. 0.478 mg/dL, P=0.72), and overall medical and surgical morbidity (P=NS). Although unadjusted patient survival was similar, sirolimus based CNI-free patients had longer death censored graft survival (96.4 vs. 76.7%, P=0.0265), higher glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the abbreviated Modified Diet in Renal Disease (66.7 vs. 50.7 cc/min, P=0.0075), and fewer graft losses from chronic allograft nephropathy. The Banff chronic scores at two years were strong predictors of 5-year GFR. At 5 years, there were six de novo (three solid organ, three skin) cancers in the CNI group and only two de novo (one skin, one leukemia, no solid organ) cancers in the sirolimus group (P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: This study of low to moderate risk patients demonstrates that excellent 5-year kidney transplant outcomes can be achieved without CNI drugs, when therapeutic drug monitoring of sirolimus is employed. The application of CNI drug avoidance protocols to high-risk recipients (retransplants, highly sensitized, etc.), extrarenal allograft recipients, or alternative drug regimens such as steroid or MMF elimination should be subjected to controlled trials.     

Hyperuricemia after renal transplantation

Hyperuricemia is common in cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients. An increased incidence of gout in patients receiving both diuretics and cyclosporine has been reported, but the effect of hyperuricemia on renal allograft function has not been studied. In a prospective, randomized trial of cyclosporine and prednisone versus azathioprine, prednisone, and antilymphocyte globulin for immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients, 105 of 131 cyclosporine and prednisone-treated patients (80 percent) experienced hyperuricemia (serum uric acid level above 8 mg/dl) and 13 of 131 (10 percent) were severely hyperuricemic (serum uric acid level above 14 mg/dl). In contrast, hyperuricemia developed in 63 of 115 patients (55 percent) treated with azathioprine, prednisone, and antilymphocyte globulin (p less than 0.002). Despite the frequent occurrence of hyperuricemia, gout was rare. Clinical gout developed in six patients in the cyclosporine and prednisone group and in 0 patients in the azathioprine, prednisone, and antilymphocyte globulin group between 1 and 43 months (median 22.5 months) after transplantation. Neither severe hyperuricemia nor diuretic therapy were associated with a significantly increased incidence of gout. The mean serum creatinine concentration of severely hyperuricemic patients (all on cyclosporine and prednisone) was similar to that of normouricemic cyclosporine and prednisone patients (1.8 mg/dl versus 1.6 mg/dl, p greater than 0.2), and the severely hyperuricemic patients had a 4-year graft survival rate of 90 percent. Asymptomatic hyperuricemia after renal transplantation does not adversely affect allograft function, requires no specific therapy, and is not a contraindication to use of diuretics.     

Recipient Uridine 5′-Diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase UGT1A9 c.98T>C Variant Determines Transplanted Kidney Filtration Rate

Mycophenolic acid preparations are commonly used in prophylaxis of kidney allograft acute rejection. The medication is metabolized by uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases, mainly UGT1A9 present in liver, kidney, and intestine. The effect of UGT1A9 allelic variants on drug metabolism in healthy volunteers and transplant recipients has been previously evaluated; these studies included the UGT1A9 c.98T>C polymorphism (rs72551330, p.Met33Thr) causing methionine-to-threonine substitution in the polypeptide chain. The study objective was to evaluate the relationship between UGT1A9 c.98T>C polymorphism and kidney graft function and survival and the risk of acute allograft rejection. Kidney recipients who underwent transplantation between 2000 and 2007 at the Medical University of Warsaw were included. Clinical data originated from standard medical records, UGT1A9 c.98T>C was genotyped using a polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism method. A group of 243 kidney transplant recipients was enrolled in the study. The frequency of the c.98C allele was 2.4% (12 of 486). Most of the carriers of the allelic variant (10 of 12) received cyclosporine A at transplantation. In the c.98C allele carriers, worse function of the renal allograft, manifested by a significantly lower glomerular filtration rate, was found in the first posttransplantation month and persisted at a lower level for 8 years after the procedure (for comparison of the UGT1A9 c.98 TT vs the UGT1A9 c.98 TC groups, P = .03). No association was found between the presence of the UGT1A9 c.98C allele and the risk of delayed renal graft function, acute rejection, dysfunction of the renal graft, or dialysis treatment reintroduction. Significantly lower estimated glomerular filtration rate of the renal allograft in UGT1A9 c.98C carriers did not translate into decreased allograft survival.     

Hyperuricemia and gout following pediatric renal transplantation

Hyperuricemia and gout are common complications in adult renal transplant recipients. In pediatric recipients, however, hyperuricemia seems to be rare, but data are scarce. Thirty-two children (21 males, 11 females) were investigated for a median time of 4.8 years (range: 0.4–11.2 years) following renal transplantation. The median age of this pediatric study group was 13.9 years (range: 5.7–20.3 years), and the calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 61 ml/min per 1.73 m² (range:12–88 ml/min per 1.73 m²). All patients were given calcineurin inhibitors, with 22 and ten children receiving cyclosporine A (CSA) and tacrolimus (TAC), respectively. The median plasma uric acid was 385 μmol/l (range: 62–929 μmol/l); 15 children (47%) were above the age-related normal range. Only one patient experienced gouty arthritis. There was a significant correlation between plasma uric acid concentration and both time span after transplantation and plasma creatinine, and an inverse correlation to GFR (p<0.05). No significant correlation was found between plasma uric acid and body mass index (BMI). Plasma uric acid concentrations were neither different among CSA- and TAC-treated children, nor did they correlate with drug exposure or blood trough levels of CSA or TAC. Plasma uric acid concentration was not different when compared to children with chronic renal failure (CRF) of a similar degree in native kidneys. We conclude that hyperuricemia is common among pediatric renal transplant recipients and rather a consequence of chronic renal transplant dysfunction than the use of calcineurin inhibitors. Gout, however, is rare.     

Immunosuppressive Agents and Metabolic Factors of Cardiovascular Risk in Renal Transplant Recipients

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for 35% to 50% of deaths among renal transplant recipients. Beside the atherogenic risk factors related to hemodialysis, renal function, and use of immunosuppressive agents, other relevant risk factors for CVD include acute rejection episodes, microalbuminuria (μAlb), diabetes, arterial hypertension, lipid disorders, inflammatory triggers, hyperhomocysteinemia, anemia, erythrocytosis, obesity, and hyperuricemia. We studied the prevalence of risk factors and the impact of various drugs on CVD among 103 renal transplant recipients with measured glomerular filtration rates showing values >45 mL/min. We measured uric acid, triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL)/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) LDL/HDL ratio, homocysteine (HOMO), insulin resistance, μAlb, C-reactive protein (CRP), and fibrinogen. Subsequently, patients were divided into 8 groups based on the immunosuppressive protocol to evaluate its impact on CVD risk factors. Insulin resistance and hyperhomocysteinemia were present in >2/3 of patients. Considering the impact of protocols, the combination of cyclosporine (CsA) + everolimus (EVL) resulted in the most favorable profile in terms of reduction of hyperuricemia, hyperlipidemia, and hyperhomocysteinemia. Insulin resistance tended to be more frequent among patients treated with protocols including calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and steroids. The prevalence of hyperhomocyteinemia was similar among patients on CsA and on tacrolimus (Tac). Sirolimus (SRL) was associated with higher levels of HOMO. The combination of CNI and proliferative signal inhibitors (PSI) seemed to be the most promising one to reduce the impact of CVD risk factors. The reduction in CVD morbidity can improve expectancy and quality of life, as well as graft function and survival among renal transplant patients.     

A Phase III Study of Belatacept Versus Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplants from Extended Criteria Donors (BENEFIT‐EXT Study)

Recipients of extended criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are at increased risk for graft dysfunction/loss, and may benefit from immunosuppression that avoids calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. Belatacept, a selective costimulation blocker, may preserve renal function and improve long‐term outcomes versus CNIs. BENEFIT‐EXT (Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First‐line Immunosuppression Trial—EXTended criteria donors) is a 3‐year, Phase III study that assessed a more (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept versus cyclosporine in adult ECD kidney transplant recipients. The coprimary endpoints at 12 months were composite patient/graft survival and a composite renal impairment endpoint. Patient/graft survival with belatacept was similar to cyclosporine (86% MI, 89% LI, 85% cyclosporine) at 12 months. Fewer belatacept patients reached the composite renal impairment endpoint versus cyclosporine (71% MI, 77% LI, 85% cyclosporine; p = 0.002 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.06 LI vs. cyclosporine). The mean measured glomerular filtration rate was 4–7 mL/min higher on belatacept versus cyclosporine (p = 0.008 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.1039 LI vs. cyclosporine), and the overall cardiovascular/metabolic profile was better on belatacept versus cyclosporine. The incidence of acute rejection was similar across groups (18% MI; 18% LI; 14% cyclosporine). Overall rates of infection and malignancy were similar between groups; however, more cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurred in the CNS on belatacept. ECD kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept‐based immunosuppression achieved similar patient/graft survival, better renal function, had an increased incidence of PTLD, and exhibited improvement in the cardiovascular/metabolic risk profile versus cyclosporine‐treated patients.     

肾移植术后血脂的变化对移植肾功能的影响

目的:探讨肾移植患者血脂代谢情况及其对移植肾功能的影响。方法:检测89例肾移植患者肾移植前、后的血脂水平,并与移植后1年内发生急性排斥反应及移植后1年时发生慢性移植肾功能不全的患者进行血清肌酐水平相关性分析。结果:与正常对照组比较,肾移植前、后的血清总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的水平显著升高(P<0.01),甘油三酯、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、极低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平无显著差异。血载脂蛋白A1水平显著低于正常对照组(P<0.01)。移植前、后上述血脂水平无显著差异。移植前高胆固醇血症与急性排斥反应的发生存在相关性,高胆固醇血症对慢性移植肾功能不全患者血清肌酐水平升高存在影响。结论:肾移植患者血脂代谢紊乱明显不同于正常人群,高脂血症对急性排斥反应及慢性移植肾功能不全的发生具有不良影响。     

Serum uric acid levels in kidney transplant recipients: A cause for concern? A review of recent literature

The impact of elevated serum uric acid levels i.e., hyperuricemia, on native and transplant chronic kidney disease progression has been debated. This literature review presents an analysis of multiple studies exploring the relationship between serum uric acid levels and kidney transplant outcomes. The review includes a summary of the pathophysiology of hyperuricemia and gout, a review of urate-lowering therapies, and an appraisal of multiple studies examining the association or lack thereof between serum uric acid level and kidney transplant outcomes. Based on these studies, elevated serum uric acid levels may contribute to CKD progression in kidney transplant recipients. In this review, we also summarize current literature to highlight risk factors associated with hyperuricemia as well as the need for further investigation to monitor and manage hyperuricemia in kidney transplant recipients.     

Glomerulonephritis is the major cause of proteinuria in renal transplant recipients: histopathologic findings of renal allografts with proteinuria

The proteinuria in renal allograft recipients has been regarded as a sign of poor prognosis. The causes of post-transplant proteinuria include chronic rejection, chronic transplant glomerulopathy, glomerulonephritis (GN), acute rejection, and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. Among them, chronic rejection is known to be most frequent. We analyzed the histopathologic findings of renal allograft biopsies in 197 Korean recipients with proteinuria. Among them, 26 patients developed proteinuria over 500 mg/d. All patients received baseline immunosuppression with cyclosporine. From 26 patients with post-transplant proteinuria, 29 biopsies were performed and their histologic diagnoses were immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) in 17, IgAN combined with chronic allograft nephropathy in 1, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in 2, crescentic GN in 1, membranous GN in 1, diabetic nephropathy in 1, acute tubulointerstitial nephritis in 1, and chronic rejection in 3 biopsies. The remaining two biopsies showed nonspecific findings. The most common cause of post-transplant proteinuria was IgAN (62% of biopsies). The incidence of chronic rejection was relatively low and predominant cyclosporine-associated changes were not observed. In conclusion, our data suggest that the main causes of post-transplant proteinuria in Korea are primary glomerulonephritides rather than chronic rejection or cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, and the kidney allograft biopsies from patients with proteinuria should be handled as native kidney.     

Clinical Significance of MHC-Reactive Alloantibodies that Develop after Kidney or Kidney–pancreas Transplantation

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationships between acute rejection, anti-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and/or class II-reactive alloantibody production, and chronic rejection of renal allografts following kidney or simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. Sera from 277 recipients were obtained pretransplant and between 1 month and 9.5 years post-transplant (mean 2.6years). The presence of anti-MHC class I and class II alloantibodies was determined by flow cytometry using beads coated with purified MHC molecules. Eighteen percent of recipients had MHC-reactive alloantibodies detected only after transplantation by this method. The majority of these patients produced alloantibodies directed at MHC class II only (68%). The incidence of anti-MHC class II, but not anti-MHC class I, alloantibodies detected post-transplant increased as the number of previous acute rejection episodes increased (p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that detection of MHC class II-reactive, but not MHC class I-reactive, alloantibodies post-transplant was a significant risk factor for chronic allograft rejection, independent of acute allograft rejection. We conclude that post-transplant detectable MHC class II-reactive alloantibodies and previous acute rejection episodes are independent risk factors for chronic allograft rejection. Implementing new therapeutic strategies to curtail post-transplant alloantibody production, and avoidance of acute rejection episodes, may improve long-term graft survival by reducing the incidence of chronic allograft rejection.     

Steroid-sparing strategies

Corticosteroids have represented the mainstay for immunosuppression since the beginning of organ transplantation. However, these agents may be responsible of a number of invalidating and even life-threatening side effects. After the introduction of cyclosporine, some randomized trials have been attempted to avoid or withdraw corticosteroids. Meta-analyses of these studies showed that acute rejection was more frequent in patients who eliminated steroids than in patients who continued steroids. However, although graft survival was not affected by steroid avoidance, an increased risk of graft failure was reported in patients with late withdrawal of steroids. Only one multicenter trial provided a long-term follow-up of patients treated with the old formulation of cyclosporine. That study showed that, in spite of a higher incidence of rejection, in patients with an early avoidance of steroids, the 9-year graft survival rate was similar to that observed in patients given cyclosporine and steroids but with reduced risks of cardiovascular, ocular, and bone complications. A more recent study with everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine showed that the 3-year patient and graft survival rates were similar in patients who stopped steroids within 1 week after transplantation and in patients who continued low doses of prednisone. The available data indicate that an early elimination of corticosteroids is feasible today in many renal transplant recipients. A steroid-sparing strategy may reduce the side effects and improve the compliance of transplant recipients.     

Current thinking on chronic renal allograft rejection: issues, concerns, and recommendations from a 1997 roundtable discussion

Chronic rejection accounts for most renal allograft losses after the first year posttransplantation. On March 24 and 25, 1997, a roundtable of five transplant surgeons, two nephrologists, and one pathologist assembled in Dallas, Texas, to review critical issues surrounding chronic renal allograft rejection. This article summarizes the presentations and relevant discussions of this meeting regarding the cause of chronic rejection, clinical diagnoses, risk factors, future prospects for intervention strategies, and general recommendations for the transplant community. Growing evidence indicates that chronic rejection is the aggregate sum of irreversible immunologic and nonimmunologic injuries to the renal graft over time. A history of acute rejection episodes and inadequate immunosuppression, likely attributable to inconsistent cyclosporine exposure or poor patient compliance, are among the most recognizable immunologic risk factors for chronic rejection. Donor organ quality, delayed graft function, and other donor and recipient variables leading to reduced nephron mass are nonimmunologic factors that contribute to the progressive deterioration of renal graft function. Clinical management of renal transplant recipients should incorporate both immunologic- and nonimmunologic-based intervention strategies aimed at minimizing risk factors to thwart the progression of chronic rejection and improve long-term allograft and patient survival.     

Transplanting kidneys from CMV-seropositive donors to CMV-seronegative recipients is not associated with poorer renal allograft function or survival.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative recipients of renal allografts from CMV-seropositive donors (D+/R-) have a higher rate of acute rejection than other renal transplant recipients. A relationship between CMV infection/disease and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) has been proposed from animal studies, although human studies have been inconclusive. The objective of this study was to determine if CMV seromatching has an effect on renal allograft function and allograft survival. METHODS: A retrospective single centre study was carried out in 333 first cadaveric transplant recipients from January 1, 1991 to December 31, 1997. The primary end-point was creatinine clearance at 3 years post-transplant in groups based on CMV seromatching. The secondary end-point was renal allograft survival. RESULTS: Mean creatinine clearance 3 years post-transplant was 53.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 of body surface area. There was no significant difference in the mean creatinine clearance for groups formed on the basis of CMV seromatching. Delayed graft function and acute rejection were associated with a lower creatinine clearance at 3 years and reduced overall graft survival [hazard ratios 2.35 (1.56-3.54) (P<0.001) and 1.57 (1.0-2.46) (P = 0.046), respectively]. Considering the end-point of graft loss due to acute rejection (censoring for death with a functioning graft) identified the D+/R- group as having an increased hazard of graft loss due to acute rejection [hazard ratio 3.12 (1.16-8.57) (P = 0.024)]. CONCLUSIONS: The D+/R- group does not appear to have poorer renal allograft function 3 years post-transplant. This group does, however, have an increased risk of early allograft loss due to acute rejection.     

Kidney Allograft Fibrosis and Atrophy Early After Living Donor Transplantation

Kidney allograft failure is most often caused by chronic allograft nephropathy, a process of interstitial fibrosis (GIF) and tubular atrophy (TA). We assessed the pathology of living donor (LD) grafts compared to deceased donor (DD). Included are 321 recipients (245 LD; 76 DD) with protocol biopsies the first 2 years of transplant. In LD, GIF was present in 7%, 31%, 61% and 71% of grafts at 0, 4, 12 and 24 months. TA progressed in parallel to GIF. Compared to LD, more DD grafts had GIF at time 0 (29%, p = 0.002); thereafter the incidence of GIF was similar. In LD, GIF was associated with lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR)(1 year) (no GIF, 62 +/- 16; GIF, 49 +/- 15 mL/min/m(2) iothalamate clearance, p = 0.001) and reduced graft survival (HR = 2.2, p = 0.009). GIF in LD related to acute rejection (HR = 2.6, p = 0.01), polyoma nephropathy (OR = 4.4, p = 0.02) and lower levels of GFR 3 weeks post-transplant (HR = 0.961; p = 0.03, multivariate). However, GIF also developed in 53% of recipients lacking these covariates. Thus, GIF/TA develops in the majority of LD grafts, it is often mild but is associated with reduced function and survival. GIF frequently develops in the absence of risk factors. Lower GFR post-transplant identify patients at highest risk of GIF.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in solid organ transplantation

Solid organ transplant recipients are at an increased risk for hypertension and cardiovascular disease. To assist in their management, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has become increasingly used in both clinical research settings and practice. ABPM has been used to better define post-transplant hypertension incidence and prevalence in different solid organ transplantation populations. ABPM provides additional information on cardiovascular risk beyond that obtained by clinic-based readings, based on its ability to assess 24-h blood pressure (BP) load, detect nocturnal non-dipping, and predict target organ damage. It has provided some assurance about the safety of living kidney donation. Information from ABPM can be used to guide living kidney donor selection, and because ABPM-related data has been correlated with clinically important kidney and heart transplant recipient outcomes, it may be a valuable adjunct in their management. Despite these advantages, barriers to wider use of ABPM include expense, clinical inertia in hypertension management, lack of prospective clinical trial data, and clinical problems that compete with hypertension for attention such as acute or chronic allograft dysfunction. The increasing amount of research and clinical use for ABPM may allow for closer assessment and intervention to help address the increased cardiovascular risk faced by many solid organ transplant recipients.     

Metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, and chronic allograft dysfunction

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is a cluster of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors (hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, and glucose homeostasis alterations), and insulin resistance (IR) is suggested to be a common pathogenic background. In the general population, MS and IR have been proven to be risk factors for diabetes, CV disease, and chronic kidney disease. In the renal transplant setting, few studies have analyzed the relevance of MS and IR. According to the few data available, the prevalence of MS in renal transplant patients has been described as 22.6% at 12 months, 37.7% at 36 months, and 64% at 6 years after transplantation. Importantly, MS has been shown to be an independent risk factor for chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD), graft failure, new-onset diabetes, and CV disease. Also, persistent hyperinsulinemia during the first posttransplant year has been related to an increase in glomerular filtration rate, probably reflecting glomerular hyperfiltration as observed in prediabetes and early type 2 diabetes. Importantly, prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance), a state hallmarked by IR, proved to be highly frequent among stable renal transplant recipients (30%), which is nearly three times its incidence in the general population. Posttransplant IR has been associated with subclinical atheromatosis as assessed by carotid intima-media thickness, and with chronic subclinical inflammation. In conclusion, MS and IR are important modifiable risk factors in renal transplant recipients, and prompt interventions to avoid its deleterious effects at the metabolic, CV, and graft function levels are needed.     

Hyperuricemia Is a Mediator of Endothelial Dysfunction and Inflammation in Renal Allograft Recipients

Background

Hyperuricemia is common in renal transplant recipients treated with calcineurin inhibitors. Uric acid induces glomerular hypertension, microvascular disease, and renal interstitial fibrosis and is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular complications. The mechanisms by which uric acid injures renal allografts and the cardiovascular system remain unclear.

Objective

To assess the influence of uric acid on biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation in renal allograft recipients.

Patients and Methods

The study included 78 allograft recipients with normal allograft function. Exclusion criteria were abnormal renal function, proteinuria, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and inflammation. Participants were divided into 2 groups: 48 patients with hyperuricemia (mean [SD] uric acid concentration, 7.72 [1.33] mg/dL) and 30 patients with normouricemia (5.48 [0.92] mg/dL; control group). Concentrations of plasma resistin, CD146, and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), which are markers of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation, were assessed in both groups. No significant differences were noted for patient demographic data including age, sex, cause of renal failure, number of HLA mismatches, delayed graft function, and number of acute rejection episodes.

Results

Concentrations of the examined biomarkers were increased in the group with hyperuricemia compared with the control group: plasma resistin, 7.15 (2.42) ng/mL vs 6.29 (2.76) ng/mL; CD146, 389.7 (150.0) μg/mL vs 330 (117) μg/mL; and sVCAM-1, 1126 (371) ng/mL vs 955 (269) ng/mL (P < .03). In addition, resistin correlated significantly with sVCAM-1 (P < .01).

Conclusions

Hyperuricemia mediates endothelial dysfunction and inflammation and via this pathway, possibly contributes to chronic allograft injury and cardiovascular events in renal allograft recipients.