An iterative EPID calibration procedure for dosimetric verification that considers the EPID scattering factor.

There has been an increasing interest in the application of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) to dosimetric verification, particularly for intensity modulated radiotherapy. Although not water equivalent, the phantom scatter factor of an EPID, Spe, is generally assumed to be that of a full phantom, Sp, a slab phantom, Sps, or a mini phantom. This assumption may introduce errors in absolute dosimetry using EPIDs. A calibration procedure that iteratively updates Spe and the calibration curve (pixel value to dose rate) is presented. The EPID (Varian Portal Vision) is irradiated using a 20 x 20 cm2 field with different beam intensities. The initial guess of dose rates in the EPID is calculated from ionization chamber measurements in air, multiplied by Sp or Sps. The calibration curve is obtained by fitting EPID readings from pixels near the beam central axis and dose rates in EPID to a quadratic equation. The Spe is obtained from EPID measurements in 10 X 10 cm2 and 20 x 20 cm2 field and from the calibration curve, and is in turn used to adjust the dose rate measurements and hence the calibration curve. The above procedure is repeated until it converges. The final calibration curve is used to convert portal dose to dose in the slab phantom, using the calibrated Spe, or assuming Spe = Sp or Spe=Sps . The converted doses are then compared with the dose measured using an ionization chamber. We also apply this procedure to off-axis points and study its dependence on the energy spectrum. The hypothesis testing results (on the 95% significance level) indicate that systematic errors are introduced when assuming Spe = Sp or Spe=Sps and the dose calculated using Spe is more consistent with ionization chamber measurements. Differences between Spe and Sps are as large as 2% for large field sizes. The measured relative dose profile at dmax using the EPID agrees well with the measured profile at dmax of the isocentric plane using film in a polystyrene phantom with full buildup and full backup, for open and wedged fields, and for a broad range of field sizes of interest. The dependence of the EPID response on the energy spectrum is removed once the calibration is performed under the same conditions as the actual measurements.     

Transit dosimetry in dynamic IMRT with an a-Si EPID

Using an amorphous silicon (a-Si) EPID for transit dosimetry requires detailed characterization of its dosimetric response in a variety of conditions. In this study, a measurement-based model was developed to calibrate an a-Si EPID response to dose for transit dosimetry by comparison with a reference ionization chamber. The ionization chamber reference depth and the required additional buildup thickness for electronic portal imaging devices (EPID) transit dosimetry were determined. The combined effects of changes in radiation field size, phantom thickness, and the off-axis distance on EPID transit dosimetry were characterized. The effect of scattered radiation on out-of-field response was investigated for different field sizes and phantom thicknesses by evaluation of the differences in image profiles and in-water measured profiles. An algorithm was developed to automatically apply these corrections to EPID images based on the user-specified field size and phantom thickness. The average phantom thickness and an effective field size were used for IMRT fields, and images were acquired in cine mode in the presence of an anthropomorphic phantom. The effective field size was defined as the percentage of the jaw-defined field that was involved during the delivery. Nine head and neck dynamic IMRT fields were tested by comparison with a MatriXX two-dimensional array dosimeter using the Gamma (3 %, 3 mm) evaluation. A depth of 1.5 cm was selected as the ionization chamber reference depth. An additional 2.2 mm of copper buildup was added to the EPID. Comparison of EPID and MatriXX dose images for the tested fields showed that using a 10 % threshold, the average number of points with Gamma index <1 was 96.5 %. The agreement in the out-of field area was shown by selection of a 2 % threshold which on average resulted in 94.8 % of points with a Gamma index <1. The suggested method is less complicated than previously reported techniques and can be used for all a-Si EPIDs regardless of the manufacturer.     

Pretreatment verification of IMRT absolute dose distributions using a commercial a-Si EPID

A commercial amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID) has been studied to investigate its potential in the field of pretreatment verifications of step and shoot, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 6 MV photon beams. The EPID was calibrated to measure absolute exit dose in a water-equivalent phantom at patient level, following an experimental approach, which does not require sophisticated calculation algorithms. The procedure presented was specifically intended to replace the time-consuming in-phantom film dosimetry. The dosimetric response was characterized on the central axis in terms of stability, linearity, and pulse repetition frequency dependence. The a-Si EPID demonstrated a good linearity with dose (within 2% from 1 monitor unit), which represent a prerequisite for the application in IMRT. A series of measurements, in which phantom thickness, air gap between the phantom and the EPID, field size and position of measurement of dose in the phantom (entrance or exit) varied, was performed to find the optimal calibration conditions, for which the field size dependence is minimized. In these conditions (20 cm phantom thickness, 56 cm air gap, exit dose measured at the isocenter), the introduction of a filter for the low-energy scattered radiation allowed us to define a universal calibration factor, independent of field size. The off-axis extension of the dose calibration was performed by applying a radial correction for the beam profile, distorted due to the standard flood field calibration of the device. For the acquisition of IMRT fields, it was necessary to employ home-made software and a specific procedure. This method was applied for the measurement of the dose distributions for 15 clinical IMRT fields. The agreement between the dose distributions, quantified by the gamma index, was found, on average, in 97.6% and 98.3% of the analyzed points for EPID versus TPS and for EPID versus FILM, respectively, thus suggesting a great potential of this EPID for IMRT dosimetric applications.     

Experimental investigation of the response of an amorphous silicon EPID to intensity modulated radiotherapy beams

The aim of this work was to experimentally determine the difference in response of an amorphous silicon (a-Si) electronic portal imaging device (EPID) to the open and multileaf collimator (MLC) transmitted beam components of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) beams. EPID dose response curves were measured for open and MLC transmitted (MLCtr) 10 x 10 cm2 beams at central axis and with off axis distance using a shifting field technique. The EPID signal was obtained by replacing the flood-field correction with a pixel sensitivity variation matrix correction. This signal, which includes energy-dependent response, was then compared to ion-chamber measurements. An EPID calibration method to remove the effect of beam energy variations on EPID response was developed for IMRT beams. This method uses the component of open and MLCtr fluence to an EPID pixel calculated from the MLC delivery file and applies separate radially dependent calibration factors for each component. The calibration procedure does not correct for scatter differences between ion chamber in water measurements and EPID response; these must be accounted for separately with a kernel-based approach or similar method. The EPID response at central axis for the open beam was found to be 1.28 +/- 0.03 of the response for the MLCtr beam, with the ratio increasing to 1.39 at 12.5 cm off axis. The EPID response to MLCtr radiation did not change with off-axis distance. Filtering the beam with copper plates to reduce the beam energy difference between open and MLCtr beams was investigated; however, these were not effective at reducing EPID response differences. The change in EPID response for uniform sliding window IMRT beams with MLCtr dose components from 0.3% to 69% was predicted to within 2.3% using the separate EPID response calibration factors for each dose component. A clinical IMRT image calibrated with this method differed by nearly 30% in high MLCtr regions from an image calibrated with an open beam calibration factor only. Accounting for the difference in EPID response to open and MLCtr radiation should improve IMRT dosimetry with a-Si EPIDs.     

Radiotherapy treatment verification using radiological thickness measured with an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device: Monte Carlo simulation and experiment

This work validates the use of an amorphous-silicon, flat-panel electronic portal imaging device (a-Si EPID) for use as a gauge of patient or phantom radiological thickness, as an alternative to dosimetry. The response of the a-Si EPID is calibrated by adapting a technique previously applied to scanning liquid ion chamber EPIDs, and the stability, accuracy and reliability of this calibration are explored in detail. We find that the stability of this calibration, between different linacs at the same centre, is sufficient to justify calibrating only one of the EPIDs every month and using the calibration data thus obtained to perform measurements on all of the other linacs. Radiological thickness is shown to provide a reliable means of relating experimental measurements to the results of BEAMnrc Monte Carlo simulations of the linac-phantom-EPID system. For these reasons we suggest that radiological thickness can be used to verify radiotherapy treatment delivery and identify changes in the treatment field, patient position and target location, as well as patient physical thickness.     

Clinical experience with EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT pre-treatment dose verification

The aim of this study was to demonstrate how dosimetry with an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (a-Si EPID) replaced film and ionization chamber measurements for routine pre-treatment dosimetry in our clinic. Furthermore, we described how EPID dosimetry was used to solve a clinical problem. IMRT prostate plans were delivered to a homogeneous slab phantom. EPID transit images were acquired for each segment. A previously developed in-house back-projection algorithm was used to reconstruct the dose distribution in the phantom mid-plane (intersecting the isocenter). Segment dose images were summed to obtain an EPID mid-plane dose image for each field. Fields were compared using profiles and in two dimensions with the y evaluation (criteria: 3%/3 mm). To quantify results, the average gamma (gamma avg), maximum gamma (gamma max), and the percentage of points with gamma < 1(P gamma < 1) were calculated within the 20% isodose line of each field. For 10 patient plans, all fields were measured with EPID and film at gantry set to 0 degrees. The film was located in the phantom coronal mid-plane (10 cm depth), and compared with the back-projected EPID mid-plane absolute dose. EPID and film measurements agreed well for all 50 fields, with (gamma avg) =0.16, (gamma max)=1.00, and (P gamma < 1)= 100%. Based on these results, film measurements were discontinued for verification of prostate IMRT plans. For 20 patient plans, the dose distribution was re-calculated with the phantom CT scan and delivered to the phantom with the original gantry angles. The planned isocenter dose (plan(iso)) was verified with the EPID (EPID(iso)) and an ionization chamber (IC(iso)). The average ratio, (EPID(iso)/IC(iso)), was 1.00 (0.01 SD). Both measurements were systematically lower than planned, with (EPID(iso)/plan(iso)) and (IC(iso)/plan(iso))=0.99 (0.01 SD). EPID mid-plane dose images for each field were also compared with the corresponding plane derived from the three dimensional (3D) dose grid calculated with the phantom CT scan. Comparisons of 100 fields yielded (gamma avg)=0.39, gamma max=2.52, and (P gamma < 1)=98.7%. Seven plans revealed under-dosage in individual fields ranging from 5% to 16%, occurring at small regions of overlapping segments or along the junction of abutting segments (tongue-and-groove side). Test fields were designed to simulate errors and gave similar results. The agreement was improved after adjusting an incorrectly set tongue-and-groove width parameter in the treatment planning system (TPS), reducing (gamma max) from 2.19 to 0.80 for the test field. Mid-plane dose distributions determined with the EPID were consistent with film measurements in a slab phantom for all IMRT fields. Isocenter doses of the total plan measured with an EPID and an ionization chamber also agreed. The EPID can therefore replace these dosimetry devices for field-by-field and isocenter IMRT pre-treatment verification. Systematic errors were detected using EPID dosimetry, resulting in the adjustment of a TPS parameter and alteration of two clinical patient plans. One set of EPID measurements (i.e., one open and transit image acquired for each segment of the plan) is sufficient to check each IMRT plan field-by-field and at the isocenter, making it a useful, efficient, and accurate dosimetric tool.     

The impact of MLC transmitted radiation on EPID dosimetry for dynamic MLC beams

The purpose of this study was to experimentally quantify the change in response of an amorphous silicon (a-Si) electronic portal imaging device (EPID) to dynamic multileaf collimator (dMLC) beams with varying MLC-transmitted dose components and incorporate the response into a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) EPID prediction model. A combination of uniform intensity dMLC beams and static beams were designed to quantify the effect of MLC transmission on EPID response at the central axis of 10 x 10 cm2 beams, at off-axis positions using wide dMLC beam profiles, and at different field sizes. The EPID response to MLC transmitted radiation was 0.79 +/- 0.02 of the response to open beam radiation at the central axis of a 10 x 10 cm2 field. The EPID response to MLC transmitted radiation was further reduced relative to the open beam response with off-axis distance. The EPID response was more sensitive to field size changes for MLC transmitted radiation compared to open beam radiation by a factor of up to 1.17 at large field sizes. The results were used to create EPID response correction factors as a function of the fraction of MLC transmitted radiation, off-axis distance, and field size. Software was developed to apply the correction factors to each pixel in the TPS predicted EPID image. The corrected images agreed more closely with the measured EPID images in areas of intensity modulated fields with a large fraction of MLC transmission and, as a result the accuracy of portal dosimetry with a-Si EPIDs can be improved. Further investigation into the detector response function and the radiation source model are required to achieve improvements in accuracy for the general case.     

Consequences of the spectral response of an a-Si EPID and implications for dosimetric calibration

One of the attractive features of amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging devices (a-Si EPIDs) as dosimetric tools is that for open fields they are known to exhibit a generally linear relation between pixel value and incident energy fluence as measured by an ion chamber. It has also been established that a-Si EPIDs incorporating high atomic number phosphors such as Gd2O2S:Tb exhibit a disproportionately large response to low-energy (<1 MeV) photons. The present work examines the consequences of this hypersensitivity in a commercially available EPID, the Varian aS500, with respect to energy fluence calibration in a 6 MV radiotherapy beam. EPIDs may be deployed in situations where the spectrum of the incident beam is modified by passing through a compensator or through a patient or phantom. By examining the specific case of a beam hardened by passage through compensator material, we show that the discrepancy between open and attenuated beam calibration curves can be as high as 8%. A Monte Carlo study using a comprehensive model of the aS500 shows that this difference can be explained by spectral changes, and further suggests that it can be reduced by the addition of an external copper plate. We consider configurations with the plate placed directly on top of the EPID cassette and 15 cm above the cassette, supported by Styrofoam. In order to reduce the maximum discrepancy to <4%, it was found that a copper thickness of approximately 0.7 cm was required in the elevated configuration. Improvement was minimal with the copper in the contact configuration. Adding 0.7 cm of copper in the elevated configuration reduced the contrast-to-noise ratio by 19% and the modulation transfer for a given spatial frequency by 30%.     

Correction of pixel sensitivity variation and off-axis response for amorphous silicon EPID dosimetry

The aim of this work is to determine the pixel sensitivity variation and off-axis dose response of an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID), and develop a correction method to improve EPID dosimetry. The uncorrected or raw pixel response of the aS500 amorphous silicon EPID shows differences in response (sensitivity) of individual pixels as well as a large off-axis differential response with respect to an ion chamber in water. Both can be corrected by division of raw images by the flood-field (FF) image. However, this leads to two problems for dosimetry: (1) the beam profile is present in both the raw image and FF image, and hence is "washed out" of the corrected image, and (2) any mismatch of EPID position between dosimetry and FF calibration means that the beam profile and off-axis response in the raw image and FF are misaligned. This causes artifacts in FF division and dosimetric errors. A method was developed to measure the off-axis response and pixel sensitivity variation separately to allow correction of images at any EPID position while retaining beam profile information. The pixel sensitivity variation is applied to the imager plane and is independent of imager position. The off-axis response depends on the imager plane position relative to the beam central axis. The pixel sensitivities were derived from multiple images of the same symmetric field acquired with the detector displaced laterally between each image. The off-axis response was measured by acquiring off-axis raw images (FF correction removed) and dividing out the off-axis beam fluence and previously determined pixel sensitivity differences. The dosimetric errors due to lateral and vertical detector displacement with the conventional FF calibration method were measured and compared to the new method. Corrected EPID profiles were then compared to beam profiles measured with ion chamber in water for open fields. The EPID was found to have a large off-axis differential response with respect to an ion chamber in water, particularly for 6 MV. This increased to 13% at 15 cm off-axis for 6 MV, and 3.5% for 18 MV at the isocenter plane. The dosimetric errors introduced by detector displacement with conventional FF calibration were found to be approximately 1% per centimeter of lateral detector displacement and 0.1% per centimeter of vertical displacement. These were reduced to less than 1% for any position with the new correction method. Corrected EPID images agreed with ion-chamber measurements to within 2% (excluding penumbra and low-dose areas outside the field) for various field sizes. The new correction method gives consistent dosimetry for any EPID position and retains beam profile information in the image.     

An intercomparison of 11 amorphous silicon EPIDs of the same type: implications for portal dosimetry

The use of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) for portal dosimetry requires knowledge of their dosimetric properties. The pixel value response of amorphous silicon EPIDs of type Elekta iViewGT is known to be nonlinear with dose. However, it is not clear whether these nonlinearities vary with time and from one detector to another, respectively. In the present study, the dose-response characteristics of 11 iViewGT EPIDs were investigated with respect to dose rate, total dose and field size. It was found that each detector needs to be individually calibrated, not only in terms of absolute sensitivity but also with respect to its relative response variations with exposure parameters. Doubling the dose rate typically increased the EPID signal between 1.4% and 2.8%. Changing the number of monitor units from 30 to 500 was accompanied by an increase in detector sensitivity between 1.7% and 2.8%. The EPID scatter factors were always within +/-1%. It was observed that the dose-response behaviour was not stable with respect to time. Particularly within the first weeks of operation, detector ageing caused variations in both absolute sensitivity and relative response curves. It is recommended to establish a quality assurance programme if the amorphous silicon EPIDs are intended to be used for clinical portal dosimetry.     

Compensator thickness verification using an a-Si EPID

Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) are being increasingly employed to make therapy verification and dose measurements in the clinic. In this work, we investigate the use of an amorphous silicon (a-Si) EPID to verify the accuracy of compensator fabrication and mounting. Compensator thickness estimates on a two-dimensional grid were calculated from the primary component of transmission obtained by subtracting a modeled scatter component from the total transmission measured with the EPID. The primary component was related to the thickness via an exponential relation that includes beam hardening. Implementation of the method involved determination of: (i) a calibration curve relating EPID pixel values to energy fluence for open and attenuated fields, which was found to be linear for open fields but to have a small quadratic component for attenuated beams; (ii) EPID scatter factors to account for field size effects, which exhibited a small dependence on compensator thickness and field size; (iii) the attenuation coefficient of the steel shot compensator material, which varied slightly with off-axis distance and field size, and (iv) an analytical model to predict scatter from the compensator, which was calculated to be <4% at the standard EPID imaging distance of 140 cm. Thickness distributions were then measured for several types of attenuators including flat, test, and clinical compensators. Although uncertainties associated with compensator manufacturing were non-negligible and made assessment of thickness measurement uncertainty difficult, we estimate the latter to be approximately 0.5 mm for steel shot compensators of thickness <4 cm.     

Transit dosimetry in IMRT with an a-Si EPID in direct detection configuration

In this study an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (a-Si EPID) converted to direct detection configuration was investigated as a transit dosimeter for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). After calibration to dose and correction for a background offset signal, the EPID-measured absolute IMRT transit doses for 29 fields were compared to a MatriXX two-dimensional array of ionization chambers (as reference) using Gamma evaluation (3%, 3 mm). The MatriXX was first evaluated as reference for transit dosimetry. The accuracy of EPID measurements was also investigated by comparison of point dose measurements by an ionization chamber on the central axis with slab and anthropomorphic phantoms in a range of simple to complex fields. The uncertainty in ionization chamber measurements in IMRT fields was also investigated by its displacement from the central axis and comparison with the central axis measurements. Comparison of the absolute doses measured by the EPID and MatriXX with slab phantoms in IMRT fields showed that on average 96.4% and 97.5% of points had a Gamma index<1 in head and neck and prostate fields, respectively. For absolute dose comparisons with anthropomorphic phantoms, the values changed to an average of 93.6%, 93.7% and 94.4% of points with Gamma index<1 in head and neck, brain and prostate fields, respectively. Point doses measured by the EPID and ionization chamber were within 3% difference for all conditions. The deviations introduced in the response of the ionization chamber in IMRT fields were<1%. The direct EPID performance for transit dosimetry showed that it has the potential to perform accurate, efficient and comprehensive in vivo dosimetry for IMRT.     

Leaf trajectory verification during dynamic intensity modulated radiotherapy using an amorphous silicon flat panel imager

An independent verification of the leaf trajectories during each treatment fraction improves the safety of IMRT delivery. In order to verify dynamic IMRT with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID), the EPID response should be accurate and fast such that the effect of motion blurring on the detected moving field edge position is limited. In the past, it was shown that the errors in the detected position of a moving field edge determined by a scanning liquid-filled ionization chamber (SLIC) EPID are negligible in clinical practice. Furthermore, a method for leaf trajectory verification during dynamic IMRT was successfully applied using such an EPID. EPIDs based on amorphous silicon (a-Si) arrays are now widely available. Such a-Si flat panel imagers (FPIs) produce portal images with superior image quality compared to other portal imaging systems, but they have not yet been used for leaf trajectory verification during dynamic IMRT. The aim of this study is to quantify the effect of motion distortion and motion blurring on the detection accuracy of a moving field edge for an Elekta iViewGT a-Si FPI and to investigate its applicability for the leaf trajectory verification during dynamic IMRT. We found that the detection error for a moving field edge to be smaller than 0.025 cm at a speed of 0.8 cm/s. Hence, the effect of motion blurring on the detection accuracy of a moving field edge is negligible in clinical practice. Furthermore, the a-Si FPI was successfully applied for the verification of dynamic IMRT. The verification method revealed a delay in the control system of the experimental DMLC that was also found using a SLIC EPID, resulting in leaf positional errors of 0.7 cm at a leaf speed of 0.8 cm/s.     

Compensator quality control with an amorphous silicon EPID

The calibration and quality control of compensators is conventionally performed with an ion chamber in a water-equivalent phantom. In our center, the compensator factor and four off-axis fluence ratios are measured to verify the central axis beam modulation and orientation of the compensator. Here we report the investigation of an alternative technique for compensator quality control using an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (a-Si EPID). Preliminary experiments were performed to identify appropriate EPID operating parameters for this relative dosimetric study and also to quantify EPID operation. The pixel value versus energy fluence response of the EPID for both open and compensated fields was then determined, and expressed via calibration curves. For open fields the response was seen to be linear, whereas for compensated fields it exhibited a small quadratic component. To account for field size effects, we measured EPID scatter factors. These exhibited small but non-negligible dependencies on compensator thickness and source-detector distance. Finally, a number of test and clinical compensators were evaluated to assess the suitability of the EPID for compensator quality control. Our results indicate that the a-Si EPID can measure clinical compensator factors and off-axis energy fluence ratios to within 2% of values measured by a Farmer chamber on average, and so is a suitable ion chamber replacement.     

Initial evaluation of a commercial EPID modified to a novel direct-detection configuration for radiotherapy dosimetry

Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) integrated with medical linear accelerators utilize an indirect-detection EPID configuration (ID-EPID). Amorphous silicon ID-EPIDs provide high quality low dose images for verification of radiotherapy treatments but they have limitations as dosimeters. The standard ID-EPID configuration includes a high atomic number phosphor scintillator screen, a 1 mm copper layer, and other nonwater equivalent materials covering the detector. This configuration leads to marked differences in the response of an ID-EPID compared to standard radiotherapy dosimeters such as ion chambers in water. In this study the phosphor and copper were removed from a standard commercial EPID to modify the configuration to a direct-detection EPID (DD-EPID). Using solid water as the buildup and backscatter for the detector, dosimetric measurements were performed on the DD-EPID and compared to standard dose-in-water data for 6 and 18 MV photons. The sensitivity of the DD-EPID was approximately eight times less than the ID-EPID but the signal was sufficient to produce accurate and reproducible beam profile measurements for open beams and an intensity-modulated beam. Due to the lower signal levels it was found necessary to ensure that the dark field correction (no radiation) DD-EPID signal was stable or updated frequently. The linearity of dose response was comparable to the ID-EPID but with a greater under-response at low doses. DD-EPID measurements of field size output factors and beam profiles at the depth of maximum dose (dmax), and tissue-maximum ratios between the depths of 0.5 and 10 cm, were in close agreement with dose in water measurements. At depths beyond dmax the DD-EPID showed a greater change in response to field size than ionisation chamber measurements and the beam penumbrae were broader compared to diode scans. The modified DD-EPID configuration studied here has the potential to improve the performance of EPIDs for dose verification of radiotherapy treatments.     

Verification of treatment parameter transfer by means of electronic portal dosimetry

Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) are mainly used for patient setup verification during treatment but other geometric properties like block shape and leaf positions are also determined. Electronic portal dosimetry allows dosimetric treatment verification. By combining geometric and dosimetric information, the data transfer between treatment planning system (TPS) and linear accelerator can be verified which in particular is important when this transfer is not carried out electronically. We have developed a pretreatment verification procedure of geometric and dosimetric treatment parameters of a 10 MV photon beam using an EPID. Measurements were performed with a CCD camera-based iView EPID, calibrated to convert a greyscale EPID image into a two-dimensional absolute dose distribution. Central field dose calculations, independent of the TPS, are made to predict dose values at a focus-EPID distance of 157.5 cm. In the same EPID image, the presence of a wedge, its direction, and the field size defined by the collimating jaws were determined. The accuracy of the procedure was determined for open and wedged fields for various field sizes. Ionization chamber measurements were performed to determine the accuracy of the dose values measured with the EPID and calculated by the central field dose calculation. The mean difference between ionization chamber and EPID dose at the center of the fields was 0.8 +/- 1.2% (1 s.d.). Deviations larger than 2.5% were found for half fields and fields with a jaw in overtravel. The mean difference between ionization chamber results and the independent dose calculation was -0.21 +/- 0.6% (1 s.d.). For all wedged fields, the presence of the wedge was detected and the mean difference in actual and measured wedge direction was 0 +/- 3 degrees (1 s.d.). The mean field size differences in X and Y directions were 0.1 +/- 0.1 cm and 0.0 +/- 0.1 cm (1 s.d.), respectively. Pretreatment monitor unit verification is possible with high accuracy and also geometric parameters can be verified using the same EPID image.     

Film dosimetry calibration method for pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy with an 192Ir source

192Ir sources have been widely used in clinical brachytherapy. An important challenge is to perform dosimetric measurements close to the source despite the steep dose gradient. The common, inexpensive silver halide film is a classic two-dimensional integrator dosimeter and would be an attractive solution for these dose measurements. The main disadvantage of film dosimetry is the film response to the low-energy photon. Since the photon energy spectrum is known to vary with depth, the sensitometric curves are expected to be dependent on depth. The purpose of this study is to suggest a correction method for silver halide film dosimetry that overcomes the response changes at different depths. Sensitometric curves have been obtained at different depths with verification film near a 1 Ci 192Ir pulsed-dose-rate source. The depth dependence of the film response was observed and a correction function was established. The suitability of the method was tested through measurement of the radial dose profile and radial dose function. The results were compared to Monte Carlo-simulated values according to the TG43 formalism. Monte Carlo simulations were performed separately for the beta and gamma source emissions, using the EGS4 code system, including the low-energy photon and electron transport optimization procedures. The beta source emission simulation showed that the beta dose contribution could be neglected and therefore the film-depth dependence could not be attributed to this part of the source radioactivity. The gamma source emission simulations included photon-spectra collection at several depths. The results showed a depth-dependent softening of the photon spectrum that can explain the film-energy dependence.     

Dose-response characteristics of an amorphous silicon EPID

Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) were originally developed for the purpose of patient setup verification. Nowadays, they are increasingly used as dosimeters (e.g., for IMRT verification and linac-specific QA). A prerequisite for any clinical dosimetric application is a detailed understanding of the detector's dose-response behavior. The aim of this study is to investigate the dosimetric properties of an amorphous silicon EPID (Elekta IVIEWGT) with respect to three photon beam qualities: 6, 10, and 25 MV. The EPID showed an excellent temporal stability on short term as well as on long term scales. The stability throughout the day was strongly influenced by warming up, which took several hours and affected EPID response by 2.5%. Ghosting effects increased the sensitivity of the EPID. They became more pronounced with decreasing time intervals between two exposures as well as with increasing dose. Due to ghosting, changes in pixel sensitivity amounted up to 16% (locally) for the 25 MV photon beam. It was observed that the response characteristics of our EPID depended on dose as well as on dose rate. Doubling the dose rate increased the EPID sensitivity by 1.5%. This behavior was successfully attributed to a dose per frame effect, i.e., a nonlinear relationship between the EPID signal and the dose which was delivered to the panel between two successive readouts. The sensitivity was found to vary up to 10% in the range of 1 to 1000 monitor units. This variation was governed by two independent effects. For low doses, the EPID signal was reduced due to the linac's changing dose rate during startup. Furthermore, the detector reading was influenced by intrabeam variations of EPID sensitivity, namely, an increase of detector response during uniform exposure. For the beam qualities which were used, the response characteristics of the EPID did not depend on energy. Differences in relative dose-response curves resulted from energy dependent temporal output characteristics of the accelerator. If ghosting is prevented from affecting the results and all dose-response effects are properly corrected for, the EPID signal becomes independent of dose rate, dose, and exposure time.     

Implementation and validation of portal dosimetry with an amorphous silicon EPID in the energy range from 6 to 25 MV

The purpose of this study was to develop, implement and validate a method for portal dosimetry with an amorphous silicon EPID for a wide energy range. Analytic functions were applied in order to correct for nonlinearities in detector response with dose rate, irradiation time and total dose. EPID scattering processes were corrected for by means of empirically determined convolution kernels. For a variety of rectangular and irregularly shaped fields, head scatter factors determined from central axis portal dose values and those measured with an ionization chamber showed a maximum deviation of 0.5%. The accuracy of our method was further investigated for pretreatment IMRT verification (i.e. without absorbers in the beam). The agreement between EPID and film dosimetry was quantified using gamma (gamma) evaluation, with 2% dose and 2 mm distance-to-agreement criteria. All gamma-distributions showed a gamma(mean) < 0.5, a 99th percentile <1.5 and a fraction of pixels with gamma > 1 smaller than 7%. The number of monitor units delivered by single segments of the IMRT fields could be extracted from the portal images with high accuracy. Measured and delivered doses were within +/-3% for more than 98% of data points. Ghosting effects were found to have limited effects on dosimetric IMRT verification.